While the City of Houston is $67 million in the hole, the County of Harris has $172 million in cash under its mattress. This, not surprisingly, has led people to grumble that the County takes in too much tax money for its needs:
"The county is so flush with money, it's unreal. They have way too much money," says Bob Lemer, the chairman of Citizens for Public Accountability, a local government watchdog and research group of retired accountants. "They're very flush because they budget like crazy, but then don't spend it by huge amounts."
As an example, he cites the county's fiscal 2002 financial report. According to the report, the county budgeted $114 million for road and bridge work, but spent only $44 million.
"I don't buy into the idea that Harris County is efficient," Lemer says. "They've got a revenue stream that is grossly more than they need."
Not surprisingly, county officials disagree. Budget Officer Dick Raycraft and County Judge Robert Eckels point out that Harris County began including a 15 percent reserve in its annual budget in 1998, a goal borne of dismal experience.
"If we were not to budget those reserves, we could do more things, but the reserves are an important part of the fiscal health of the county," Eckels said.
Oh, and by the way: It was a bitch finding this thing in the first place. A Google search on +"harris county" +"commissioner's court" takes you to this totally useless page. There are pages for each individual Commissioner linked on the Harris County home page (and am I the only one who finds it amusing that Robert Eckels' page looks more like a campaign site than a government site?), but to find this report I had to find the County Auditor first.
As for the city, it's just all confusing:
Although the city's revenue over the next 17 months is expected to be $67 million less than projected, the city is not actually in the red. City officials still expect to end this fiscal year June 30 with a balance of about $81 million, slightly exceeding the required reserve of 5 percent of its operating expenses.
But almost all of that $81 million exists only on paper, in the form of revenue expected later in the year.
To city Councilwoman Annise Parker, the difference between the two governments is largely one of philosophy: The city sees its responsibility as providing the best services it can, while the county provides only those services it can afford under its budget.
"I think there is more long-term thinking at the county," she says.
Parker is not alone. Almost everyone interviewed for this article cited the county's long-term outlook as the key to its current fiscal success. Such a philosophy is easier at the county because, without term limits, county elected officials tend to enjoy more stability. Until Sylvia Garcia took office as Precinct 2 commissioner last month, for example, there had been no change in the makeup of Commissioners Court for eight years.
Moreover, Harris County government is less bureaucratic, with elected commissioners having far more control over projects in their districts than do City Council members.
Because of term limits, city budget planners, mayors and council members come and go at least every six years.
Critics say term limits -- combined with the city's "strong mayor" form of government, which all but guarantees an adversarial relationship with council members -- result in short-term thinking on long-range issues.
"In the city of Houston, everything is political," said George Scott, president of the Tax Research Association of Harris County. "If it's good for politics tomorrow, then it's good. If it makes sense today, we'll worry whether it makes sense next month or next year."