When I first glanced at the headline of this Chron op-ed piece, which reads "Why should hospital district cover illegals?", I figured it would be the standard-issue ignorant nativist rant, and I started to prepare some responses as I read through it. About midway through, I realized there was no point in arguing with it, because it was such a poorly written muddle that I had no idea what author Eric Yollick was actually talking about.
Then I got to this paragraph, which stopped me dead in my tracks:
The real beneficiaries of illegal immigration are the businesses that employ them illegally. You and I pay approximately 72 percent of our disposable income to taxes -- local, state and federal -- in many different forms -- income, ad valorem, sales and use. Illegal immigrants do not pay nearly those amounts. Employers get the benefit of these employees. Why, then, should they not bear the burden instead of spreading that burden across all taxpayers, rich and poor alike (which is what we do through the ad valorem taxes that MCHD assesses)?
I've seen statistics pulled out of the air before, but this one takes the cake. Eric Yollick, if you're reading this, I officially triple-dog dare you to document that 72% figure. Feel free to drop me a note or leave me a comment. In return, I'll recommend a few good accountants for you so you can bring that burden down a tad. It's the least I can do for you.Posted by Charles Kuffner on December 26, 2003 to Skepticism | TrackBack