January 30, 2005
It's in Hartnett's hands

The next step in the Heflin challenge will be taken by Discovery Master Will Hartnett, who will issue his recommendations on Wednesday. Along the way, he rejected some bogus evidence presented by Team Heflin.


Hartnett, R-Dallas, ruled as irrelevant testimony by a Republican pollster who used calculations to project Heflin's margin of victory.

Michael Baselice, an Austin-based pollster, testified Friday as an expert witness for Heflin.

Heflin's lawyers said he would win by five votes, based on their analysis of 91 ballots cast by allegedly ineligible voters who have been willing to reveal their votes.

Baselice used a mathematical analysis, known as extrapolation, to determine that Heflin's margin of votes would increase when applied to the remaining 250 potentially illegal ballots that were cast and counted.

"It's a projection of a known quantity," Baselice said. "It gives us an idea about how these may end up."

Under cross-examination, Baselice acknowledged that what he did was "nothing more than middle school math." He also said that he knew nothing about the votes, other than the percentage breakdown Heflin's lawyers gave him.


Of course, we could have taken the evidence that three out of four illegal voters interviewed by the Chron had voted for Heflin, and extrapolated a much larger margin of victory for Vo. It would have been as scientific. Even if you could somehow claim this was a representative sample, the margin of error for a sample of 91 with a population of 40,000 is 10.26% (it's 8.61% for a sample of 129; see below), which would make it a useless predictor for anything else. Why Team Heflin thought this was relevant evidence is beyond me.

For some odd reason, this story gives a different total in Baselice's sample:


Taylor got sworn statements from 129 of the 250 people who cast what he says were illegal votes. Of those, 86 said they voted for Vo and 43 for Heflin.

Taylor argued that meant Heflin won the election by 10 votes.

Larry Veselka, one of Vo's attorneys, said Taylor's numbers show Vo winning by 37 votes.

As each vote was scrutinized over the past two days, attorneys argued over its legality. Hartnett made occasional comments, sometimes agreeing with one side and sometimes the other. He often said he would have to return to a specific vote.

At one point he told attorneys that "you're asking me to assume an awful lot here."

"No one knows for sure what he's thinking," said Rick Gray, one of Vo's attorneys. "He's giving everyone a fair shake."


I don't understand the reason for the discrepancy, but whatever - it was baloney either way. I'm just glad to hear that Team Vo has faith in Hartnett.

Finally, a quick hit from the Morning News.


Defeated GOP Rep. Talmadge Heflin continued his vanity bid Thursday, telling the Texas House why representatives should invalidate his loss to Democrat Hubert Vo. We remind you that this election has been through a few recounts already. And even some Republicans think Mr. Heflin has no business asking the House to throw out his loss. Most of all, we think the last thing the House needs is a partisan sideshow. The redistricting battles of 2003 split the place up enough. It's time to heal and move on.

Amen.

Posted by Charles Kuffner on January 30, 2005 to Election 2004 | TrackBack
Comments

Your coverage of this absurd assault on the democratic process has been commendable. Surprisingly, so was Republican Will Hartnett's demeanor during the two days of hearing.

Now it's mathematically impossible for Heflin to win the race he lost at the ballot box. The only thing that will put him over the top would be a political decision by the GOP-controlled House to seat him regardless of the evidence.

Even a new election -- still a distinct possibility -- isn't likely to get Talmadge his old job back. But is IS likely to galvanize Asian American and other HD 149 voters to the Democrats for a generation to come.

Let's hope the ideological extremists who run the State Capitol follow their partisan instincts and order a new election. It will only hasten their demise.

Posted by: Zangwell Arrow on January 30, 2005 11:07 AM

Baselice? This is the same joker who tried to get the GOP primary in Bexar County tossed in 2002 because of alleged underparticipation by Hispanics. His methods have no credible foundation . . . he's all smoke and mirrors.

Posted by: Keith on January 30, 2005 9:30 PM