March 06, 2005
Bedford rollback passes

By ten votes.

In a record 33 percent turnout, residents voted 4,929 to 4,919 for the measure, according to unofficial results.

"I feel it's a big win when you consider the odds that were against us," rollback supporter Bob Stewart said.

Members of the anti-rollback efforts were devastated by the results, standing in stunned silence as the numbers were announced at the Pat May Center and hugging each other in despair or frustration.

"Ten stinking votes," resident David Moon said. "Maybe we need a recount."

Mayor Rick Hurt said rollback opponents were contemplating asking for a recount, but he advised caution.

Although part of him wants to consider it, he said, "This city must heal."

If the tax rollback stands, the city's property tax rate will drop from 49.5 cents per $100 of assessed property value to 40 cents. Property owners can expect to receive rebates. The owner of a $150,000 house -- about the average price of a house in Bedford -- would save $142.50 a year.

All that for a lousy hundred forty bucks a year? Geez.

City officials say they will have to cut $2.6 million out of the $24.8 million general fund budget.

Election results will be canvassed March 14. City manager Chuck Barnett said he would make recommendations for cuts at council work sessions scheduled for March 18 and 19. The council would then have to amend the budget, possibly at a special meeting March 29.

Officials have said threatened items include Bedford Splash, the library and senior citizens center.

Hurt said he didn't know which services would go first, but he said he would try to protect public safety.

More than 100 employees may be laid off, officials have said. Jeanne Green, who works at the library, stood still in shock after the results were announced.

"This is awful," she said. "The city is going to die."

Rollback supporters disagreed. Throughout the campaign, they said the city was using scare tactics to stop a rollback.

"Nobody's going to lose their job," resident Ralph Good predicted. "There may be some adjustments."

They can't both be right. Someone's going to be pleasantly or unpleasantly surprised later this month.

Ten votes. There's a reason people keep insisting that every vote counts.

Posted by Charles Kuffner on March 06, 2005 to Election 2005 | TrackBack

I got it right, but it was a lot closer than I'd have predicted. But as with Prop. 12, a loss for our side is still a loss. Damn.

Posted by: Mathwiz on March 11, 2005 3:55 PM

The waterpark, library and countless other services that made the town stand out from the others are now closed. The 4,929 idiots that made this all happen should all be proud of the fact that they distroyed what made the town great. Good job assclowns. You should make your kids proud. Those of you dumbasses that have kids will waste that $150 saved in 2 weekends at the waterpark in richland hills.

Posted by: sam on April 11, 2005 1:06 AM

Well, we have a reprieve. An anomymous donor gave $300,000 to open the library, BRAC and Splash.

More importantly are the city council elections coming up in May. We have the pro-rollback group supporting two candidates that would like to see the tax rate go even lower. What services would we see permanently gone then?

The sound bites they offer sound good but do people always believe what they're told without checking it out? Apparently, in Bedford they do.

Posted by: reader on April 25, 2005 10:23 AM