December 26, 2008
Statewide smoking ban proposed

I've been saying that a statewide smoking ban would be on the legislative agenda next spring. Well, here it comes.


State Sen. Rodney Ellis , D-Houston , and state Rep. Myra Crownover, R-Denton, said they plan to file a bill in the legislative session beginning Jan. 13 that would ban smoking in indoor workplaces, including bars and restaurants. Though opponents say a ban would violate personal liberties and hurt their livelihoods, 24 states have passed a similar measure.

"You shouldn't have to choose between your job and your health," Crownover said.

Crownover and Ellis filed the same proposal in 2007; a watered-down version passed the House, and the Senate proposal stalled in committee. Since then, Dallas and Corpus Christi have strengthened smoke-free laws, and the Lance Armstrong Foundation has made a statewide ban its top priority in Texas.

Dallas joined cities including Austin, El Paso and Houston in passing bans that advocates for smoke-free workplaces consider comprehensive. Dallas' expanded policy -- which bans smoking in bars and other indoor workplaces but exempts outdoor patios and some existing tobacco shops -- will go into effect April 10; Corpus Christi has a ban starting April 15.

With some major Texas cities becoming smoke-free, the time is right for a statewide measure, Ellis said. "All of those doomsday prophets have been proven wrong. There has not been a mass exodus of clubs and bars to the suburbs," he said.

[...]

Though Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, who presides over the Senate, has supported a statewide smoking ban -- in an unusual move, he testified in favor of the proposal during the 2007 Senate committee hearing -- Ellis said trying to pass his proposal will be an uphill battle.

One thing that could help him is that since the 2007 legislative session, a powerful ally -- the Lance Armstrong Foundation -- joined Smoke-Free Texas, a coalition that includes the American Cancer Society, the American Heart Association and the American Lung Association.

Armstrong and his Austin-based foundation were instrumental in getting support for a $3 billion cancer research measure that Texas voters approved in 2007. And in 2008, the cyclist and cancer survivor supported the ban in Dallas by sending letters to City Council members and writing a newspaper column, said foundation President Doug Ulman.


Having Lance Armstrong on board certainly couldn't hurt. I think the experience of the big cities that have passed their own bans will be more persuasive, but you can't have too many things working in your favor with the Lege. I won't predict success, because it's always easier to stop a bill than to pass one, but I'd say Ellis and Crownover's odds are better than they were in 2007.

Posted by Charles Kuffner on December 26, 2008 to That's our Lege
Comments

I would have more respect for Rodney Ellis' attempts to force me to live healthily if he lost about 60 pounds. He needs to eat less and exercise more.

Posted by: Dale on December 26, 2008 9:18 AM

Obesity is demonstrably more harmful than second hand smoke. It's causal relationship to Type II diabetes and heart disease is well established. And there is clearly a public purpose to be achieved by reducing public health care expenditures. Can mandatory public exercise be far behind? What about limiting carb intake by official state-wide nutritional rules?

'scuse me while I go out back for a stogie. And pray that our Legislature has better things to worry about. Not to mention wondering how it is that a Legislature dominated by small government Republicans can find an exception to their principles when it comes to regulating smoking.

Posted by: Dennis on December 26, 2008 9:50 AM

Sorry fellows, but someone else's obesity doesn't make anyone else ill. Secondhand smoke does. Even the big tobacco companies now acknowledge this as fact.

Posted by: Pete on December 26, 2008 3:55 PM

I'd like to see a statewide smoking ban be followed up with a crackdown on alcohol consumption in bars. Studies show that an increase in taxes will lead to a decrease in public drinking. A beer consumed in a bar should be about $15. Patrons could choose non-alcoholic drinks for a much lower charge, or drink alcohol at home at today's prices. Also, let's get the TABC back into the bars with undercover agents and eliminate Public Intoxication in bars once and for all. This will help eliminate the horrible second hand effects of alcohol and help Sen. Ellis lose weight as well, since alcohol is a major factor in obesity. Also, we need a strict sound law so that workers and customers are not forced to damage their hearing in live music venues.

Posted by: Sam on December 26, 2008 9:03 PM

And we need to pass a strict law banning employees of Dunkin Donuts from consuming what they bake while on the job. A kind and compassionate society, expressing its will through its elected officials, would never permit such blatant abuse. Also on the legislative agenda: new rules for day care centers, prohibiting under penalty of law, any childish behavior that will irritate under-paid day care workers. Makes every bit as much sense as banning second hand smoking.

Posted by: Dennis on December 27, 2008 3:33 AM
Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)