This story just boggles my mind.
Think traffic congestion is bad now? Wait until 2012.
That's when Texas' highway fund -- which relies on a motor fuels tax that hasn't been raised since 1991 -- will be out of money for new construction contracts, according to state senators and transportation officials urging action now on new funding options.
"The course we're on will result in no new roads in Texas in the very near future," Sen. John Carona, Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee chairman, said Wednesday.
To try to address the problem, the Texas Senate on Wednesday gave preliminary approval 23-8 to a bill by Carona, R-Dallas, to allow local-option elections in regions around the state to raise fees or taxes for local projects.
While lawmakers consider the issue, Texas Transportation Commission member Ned Holmes of Houston said the state motor fuels tax has dipped even as the population increased.
Not only will funding for new construction contracts be gone in 2012, money for maintenance of existing roads will be insufficient, leaders said.
"There will be no new capacity money after about 2012," Holmes said. "None. ... So we have this growing population, we have an increasing average mile per gallon in the fleet (motor vehicles) and we have a fixed gasoline tax. There is no way that we can fund the needs that we have with this formula."
The state also gets federal money and uses bonds to fund roads, but several senators said continued reliance on debt isn't sustainable.
The 20-cent-a-gallon state gasoline tax that fuels the highway fund, meanwhile, hasn't been raised since 1991, and there appears little appetite to do so this session.
And yet the idea that the government may need more money to do something as basic and necessary as build and maintain roads is enough to get the usual crowd of taxophobes into a lather.
Opponents included Sen. Dan Patrick, R-Houston, who voiced concern that county officials would have the opportunity "to tax their citizens and tax their citizens and tax their citizens."
GOP Gov. Rick Perry, who will have the opportunity to sign or veto the bill if it passes the House, is committed to working with Carona on transit issues but "has strong concerns about the host of significant tax increases," said his spokeswoman, Allison Castle.
The bill, which will need a state constitutional amendment as well to go into effect, would allow county commissioners in the Metroplex, Central Texas, Bexar County and a few other spots to call elections asking voters for permission to raise one or more of six fees or taxes. This includes up to a 10-cent-a-gallon local gasoline tax.
The Texas Public Policy Foundation and some other conservatives oppose the bill. Although it doesn't raise taxes, instead allowing others (well, voters really) to make that decision, an aspiring politician could argue in a future Republican primary that the Legislature was part of a multi-part scheme to raise taxes. Convoluted perhaps, but enough to have spooked Dewhurst and some other Republicans.
The mindset just confounds me. I mean, either you think there's no legitimate way to impose a tax, or you think there's some magic alternate way to fund this need that somehow won't be borne by the citizens. I suppose you could favor toll roads for all new construction, financed by bonds to be paid off by toll revenues, but what about existing roads? Do the Dan Patricks and the Rick Perrys have an alternate plan, or do they think none is necessary because it'll all take care of itself? Burka and Eye on Williamson have more.
UPDATE: You may have noticed that Harris County is not part of SB855, which is a curious omission. Burka notes the reason for that:
What [Harris County officials] didn't want was to give Senator Dan Patrick a platform for opposing the bill on the Senate floor. So the decision was made that the Houston region will be included when the bill reaches the House floor, by an amendment, probably authored by Wayne Smith.