Off the Kuff Rotating Header Image

Rural school districts prepare for the worst

I have very mixed emotions reading a story like this.

For the residents of [the] tiny West Texas farming community [of Miles], the school district is central to their identity, history and way of life.

“There’s a wonderful feel about a small community,” said Glenda Lacy, the keeper of Miles’ history. “I wouldn’t want to be anywhere else.”

Miles, however, faces a serious threat to its survival from the school budget cuts being mulled in the Texas Capitol.

Lawmakers are considering a two-year budget proposal that does not cover $10 billion owed to school districts under current law, which would amount to a 14 percent reduction in total state and local education spending.

The possibility of such a loss of state aid has superintendents across Texas fretting about school closures, layoffs and fewer programs for students.

But for [Miles’ school superintendent Robert] Gibson, the worst-case scenario could mean the end of his town.

Miles will receive about $2.5 million this year in direct state aid while local taxpayers chip in another $710,000 by paying the maximum property tax rate allowed by state law.

Under the proposals floating around the Capitol, the district could be out as much as $508,000 — about 15 percent of its total budget — for each year of the 2012-13 budget. And Gibson can’t ask voters to authorize any more local tax money to make up the difference.

“Everything we have asked of them, they have done,” Gibson said. “If we ask them to dig a little deeper, I’m sure they would. But I don’t think it’s fair.”

[…]

Bill Grusendorf, executive director of the Texas Association of Rural Schools , said that if state education money must be cut, it should come from the school districts that get the most in per-student funding, not the small districts struggling at the bottom.

“The danger there, politically, is that we’re outnumbered,” said state Rep. Harvey Hilderbran , R-Kerrville, whose district includes Miles.

If representatives from urban and suburban districts team up, Hilderbran said, the rural districts are doomed.

On the one hand, I feel terrible for these small, rural districts. As Warren Chisum pointed out, they are the largest employers in many West Texas towns. The cuts outlined in the Pitts and Ogden budgets really would be their death knell. On the other hand, let’s be honest: They’re getting exactly what they voted for. By my calculation, Rep. Hilderbran’s district gave Rick Perry 75% of the vote last year. Perhaps some of them were as misled about the state of the state’s finances as Jim Keffer’s constituents apparently were, but it’s not like they haven’t been voting for self-professed small-government budget-cutting Republicans all along. They wanted smaller government and budget cuts, now they’re going to get them. How much sympathy am I supposed to muster?

Which isn’t to say that they don’t have some legitimacy to their complaint. Though again, it all stems from something I’m sure the residents out there largely support, the 2006 property tax cuts:

So that no school district suffered as the balance of state and local money changed, lawmakers essentially froze the level of per-student revenue at what each school district was getting in 2005-06.

That snapshot captured some districts at an ideal moment because of what was happening on the ground locally. Others were not so lucky.

One district near Miles has $6,700 per student in combined state and local money while Miles’ take is $5,065. Though it has 100 fewer students than Miles, the neighboring district has $1 million more to spend because of that difference.

“Every student ought to be worth the same amount of money, but they’re not, and that’s not fair to the students,” said Elaine Baca , a school board member in Miles.

And that inequity will surely be a key component to the next school finance lawsuit. At the end of the day, though, if you want public schools to get what they need you have to vote for politicians who make them a priority, not property tax cuts. Maybe now that message will start to get through.

Related Posts:

13 Comments

  1. mark says:

    if you want public schools to get what they need you have to vote for politicians who make them a priority, not property tax cuts. Maybe now that message will start to get through.

    I hope you’re right, but I doubt it. The disconnect between wanting services and actually paying for services seems huge here in Texas.

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by offthekuff, republicancuts. republicancuts said: RT @offthekuff Rural school districts prepare for the worst: I have very mixed emotions reading a story like this…. http://bit.ly/eEsFBE […]

  3. Sean says:

    This is typical of the America of today. We all want something for nothing. Want schools, want roads… there are so many people who seriously think a teacher should be making about $15,000 a year, live with their parents, never marry, never have kids, never retire, never take a sick day, go to the “right” church on Sunday, have at least an Ed.S., work 18 hour days…..you think I’m kidding? Ask around and see what they REALLY think.

  4. Ross says:

    Kuff, your tax bill would go up $1700 if the rates reverted to pre cut numbers. Are you willing to pay that much more in property taxes? I’m not, as the $800 mine would go up isn’t in my budget right now. I honestly don’t know where I would get that money.

  5. Ross, I’m not saying the Lege has to roll back the entire 2006 property tax cut. I’m saying they need to fix the structural deficit, which begins with revisiting the Business Margins Tax to ensure it is bringing in all the revenue it should be. If they can fix this without touching property taxes, great! Go for it! Just close the gap, in whatever reasonable fashion makes the most sense. That’s all I’m saying.

  6. texaschick says:

    http://eyeonwilliamson.org/?p=7118

    Perry/GOP don’t want to fix the structural tax deficit according to the article above.

  7. texaschick says:

    BTW, most of the teachers I know voted GOP and most of them watch Fox News so they don’t have a clue about what is really going on. I just don’t get it.

  8. […] small towns lose a piece of their identities, but again this would be entirely consistent with what they have been voting for, so I won’t lose too much sleep over […]

  9. […] What these folks are potentially facing is catastrophic, and yes, life-threatening. But as with the rural school districts, one cannot escape the conclusion that this is what they have voted for themselves. Here are […]

  10. […] Texas region, which will have a lot more of those opportunities than, say, rural areas, where job losses in school districts are unlikely to be offset. It also doesn’t take into account losses in county and municipal […]

  11. […] exist because it became practically impossible to live there? The school districts out there are heavily threatened by the budget cuts. What happens if some of them fall apart as a […]

  12. […] as may be, but as I’ve said before, these people are getting exactly what they voted for. If it turns out that’s not […]

  13. […] by their legislators. The good news, if you want to look at it that way, is that that’s precisely what happened this past session, so if there’s ever a time to try a persuasion campaign, this […]