National Dems to help target Texas House seats

Good. Keep it up.

National Democrats on Wednesday unveiled their most ambitious list of targets in the Texas House in years, adding a dozen districts, on top of three previously announced seats, to their battleground docket for the fall midterms.

Twelve of the Texas districts targeted by the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, an arm of the national party that focuses on state legislatures, are currently held by Republicans. If Democrats were to flip all 12 — the same number they netted in 2018 — and hold onto all their current districts, they would be one seat shy of an even split in the lower chamber, which has been under GOP control since 2003.

Republicans currently hold 88 seats to Democrats’ 62 in the Texas House; 76 seats make a majority.

“As the Texas GOP rallies around Ken Paxton and an extreme slate of MAGA candidates up and down the ballot, we are ready to make big gains for Democrats in the Texas Legislature,” DLCC President Heather Williams said in a statement. “The DLCC is proud to partner with these target race candidates who are laser-focused on bringing down costs for Texans and gradually changing the face of power in Texas.”

The target list, first reported by The Texas Tribune, includes South Texas districts that were recently held by Democrats and perennial targets in the suburbs. It also includes a handful of dark horse seats that broke decisively for President Donald Trump and the Republican House candidate in 2024.

Beyond the dozen GOP districts they are targeting, Democrats also put three of their own seats on the battleground map: those held by Reps. Mihaela Plesa in Dallas and Eddie Morales Jr. in Eagle Pass, and retiring Rep. Bobby Guerra’s district in Mission.

Of the 15 districts, all but one voted for Trump in 2024 over Vice President Kamala Harris, with the narrowest margin for Trump coming in at 1.4 percentage points and the widest at 14.7 points. The top-of-the-ticket margins were more favorable for Democrats in 2018 across nearly every district, however, had the current lines been in place for Beto O’Rourke’s near-upset of U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz.

The effort marks the first time national Democrats are investing resources in Texas legislative races since 2020, when Democrats vastly underperformed despite a well-financed effort to flip the Texas House. The party has lost ground since then, hampered by Republicans fortifying their majority during decennial redistricting in 2021, along with defeats in South Texas amid Latino voters’ shift to the right.

But after three straight cycles in the wilderness, Democrats are optimistic that 2026 might resemble the last Trump midterm election in 2018, due to factors like Trump’s falling approval ratings over rising everyday costs, backlash to the war in Iran and the baggage carried by Attorney General Ken Paxton atop the GOP ticket as the U.S. Senate nominee. Democratic state Sen. Taylor Rehmet’s special election upset in a dark red seat this year has also bolstered the party’s hopes.

“The DLCC has the strategy and Target Map to capitalize on the once-in-a-generation opportunity to build greater Democratic state legislative power in Texas and across the country,” the DLCC said in its announcement.

[…]

Among the races on the DLCC’s target list are several that Democrats have sought to flip for years, including House Districts 108 and 112, suburban North Texas seats occupied by Reps. Morgan Meyer of University Park and Angie Chen Button of Garland, respectively, who have held off Democrats dating back to the 2018 wave.

Democrats also set their sights on a pair of San Antonio-based seats: District 121, where hard-right Rep. Marc LaHood defeated a more moderate Republican incumbent in the 2024 primary, and District 118, where Rep. John Lujan ceded reelection to run for Congress this cycle and the Democratic nominee from 2024, Kristian Carranza, is running again.

Trump carried each of those districts in 2024 by less than 6 percentage points, but each of the Republican lawmakers, aside from Lujan, outperformed the top of the ticket that year. In 2018, Cruz would have defeated O’Rourke by 5 points or less in the Meyer, Button and LaHood districts had they existed under the current lines; O’Rourke, meanwhile, would have carried Lujan’s district by 5 points that year.

In South Texas, discontent among Hispanic voters over the economy and the Trump administration’s deportation crackdown could help Democrats bring that bloc back to the party. There, Democrats are looking to topple Rep. Denise Villalobos, whose heavily Latino Corpus Christi-based district broke for Trump by just 1.4 percentage points in 2024 and would have elected O’Rourke by a whopping 16.5 points in 2018. Still, Villalobos won House District 34 by almost 11 points in 2024, running well ahead of Trump and flipping what had previously been a Democratic seat.

San Benito Rep. Janie Lopez, who flipped her district at the southern tip of Texas in 2022, is also in the DLCC’s sights, having run slightly behind Trump in 2024 while still winning by 10 points. Her majority-Latino seat, House District 37, would have gone for O’Rourke by 8 points in 2018.

And then there are the districts where a Democratic victory would mark a significant upset. Five of the seats targeted by the DLCC are ones where, in 2024, Trump won by 8 points or more and the Republican incumbent won reelection by over 11 points. Those include North Texas-based House Districts 61, 67 and 94 — respectively represented now by Reps. Keresa Richardson, Jeff Leach and retiring Tony Tinderholt — in addition to Round Rock’s District 52 and Houston’s District 138, represented by Reps. Caroline Harris Davila and Lacey Hull, respectively.

The original target list had only five seats on it, so it’s nice to see more aggression as the political climate has gotten more favorable. I’d say this is the year to go for broke, bearing in mind that if we don’t make major gains, including statewide, whatever we do this year is going to be wiped out by a hyper-aggressive partisan re-redistricting for 2028. Winning the House isn’t enough, we really have to win the Governor’s race, and probably more than that as well. If that feel daunting, I get it. It’s asking a lot from a party that hasn’t won anything statewide in thirty years. I’m just saying what the stakes are.

And the universe of potential flips is larger than what is presented here. Lone Star Left did a good job of rounding up some Republican intel, to identify even more seats that could be in range of the November wave. You still have to take into account things like candidate quality and fundraising, but just being a successful incumbent is not enough to avoid being swept under.

In 2018, there was a lot more focus on Congress, as there were multiple Democratic contenders who raised tons of money and made seemingly impregnable districts highly competitive. I feel like the State House was more under the radar that year, and I think the magnitude of the shift in that chamber – along with two State Senate seats, one SBOE seat, and dozens of judges – was big enough to make the Republicans less radical and dangerous, for one session. I think they’re more prepared for it this time, and there are fewer Congressional districts in play (not to mention only one competitive State Senate seat, and that one was already flipped in January), so after the Senate race this is where the action is. Against that, the conditions are worse for Republicans and better for Democrats.

In the short term, what I want to see is better fundraising from a wide range of Democratic candidates, more evidence of campaign coordination across locations and candidates, and as much visible energy as we can muster. We all want to catch the wave, but we all have a part in making it, too.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Here come the screwworms

In case you missed it.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Wednesday confirmed the country’s first case of New World screwworm — the parasitic fly poised to harm the state’s $15 billion cattle industry — in South Texas.

The USDA tested a sample from La Pryor in Zavala County at the USDA’s National Veterinary Services Laboratories in Ames, lowa, confirming the infestation, Secretary Brooke Rollins said during a press conference about the case. The infested animal is a three-week old calf, and there have been no other detections so far.

The USDA said in a social media post earlier Wednesday that it was testing a suspected screwworm sample and that it had already activated personnel on the ground and were working with local partners.

The confirmation comes one day after Rollins debunked the claims of a state lawmaker that the screwworm was less than 1 mile from the U.S.-Mexico border.

State and federal officials had been bracing for the arrival of screwworm for months, fearing its potential impact to livestock and the agriculture industry at-large.

The parasitic fly targets the live flesh of warm mammals including cattle, pets, wildlife and humans. Screwworm infects them by embedding their larvae in open wounds. The larvae feed off the flesh, causing severe wounds or death.

Rollins said residents near affected areas should check their pets for signs of screwworm infection, which include infected wounds and screwworm eggs or larvae. She also said that issues with screwworms should not cause food supply chain issues, as screwworms do not infest meat, fruits or vegetables.

Screwworm had been eradicated in the U.S. since the 1960s when the pest was pushed back into Central America. However, cases began springing up in Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Honduras. In 2024, Mexico reported its first case.

Since early 2025, the U.S. has deployed more than 8,000 traps capable of detecting screwworm, Rollins said, resulting in 58,000 samples and 19,000 wildlife tested — all of which tested negative, until today’s case.

Rollins blamed the spread of screwworm toward the U.S.-Mexico border on “the open-border policies of the last administration and the resulting illicit cattle movement” in a separate social media post an hour before Wednesday’s press conference. She also said that she met virtually with Texas’ Animal Health Commission and about 50 cattle ranchers, and has been in contact with Gov Greg Abbott and Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows.

[…]

On Monday, state Rep. Don McLaughlin, a Uvalde Republican, claimed the fly was just one mile away from Texas. Rollins dismissed those claims Tuesday at a news conference, calling McLaughlin “well-intentioned” but wrong.

“Well … maybe we should listen to our state representatives,” McLaughlin tweeted after the USDA announced the suspected case Wednesday.

We’ve already established that Brooke Rollins is an unqualified hack, but we always appreciate another illustration of it. Even Sid Miller is critical of the USDA’s response to the screwworm threat. This background story on the New World screwworm adds a bit of context.

The spread of New World screwworms across Central America has been very rapid, seemingly traveling hundreds of miles within weeks.

Animal experts believe the movement is too quick to be done by the fly itself, meaning people were clearly shipping infested livestock around Central America.

Screwworms usually don’t stray too far from their natural tropical and subtropical climates on their own. The parasitic flies do not tolerate prolonged periods of very dry, hot, or very cold weather. Rapid spread in a country is mainly due to humans moving infested animals over large distances.

After Mexican officials confirmed a case of screwworm in November 2024, the USDA, under former President Joe Biden, closed southern ports of entry to live cattle imports to prevent the spread of screwworm into the U.S. However, the move also strained the supply of cattle in the state, hitting some in the cattle industry hard.

The USDA reversed course in February 2025, after President Donald Trump took office, announcing the opening of the ports, only to close them again in May 2025.

In an effort to prevent its spread, the USDA shut down the southern border to live animal imports in May 2025, preventing cattle from Mexico from entering the U.S. and limiting the supply of cattle in Texas.

It’s currently unknown how the screwworm infestation reached South Texas.

Now we get to try to make it go away again. The “sterile fly” technique, which was used before with success, will be used again. Today I Learned that the facility that generates these sterile flies, which is in Panama, had its production disturbed by the COVID pandemic. Who knew? More from the Trib here, and NBC News and the Associated Press have more.

UPDATE: And now there’s two.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hill County undoes its data center moratorium

Nothing like a big lawsuit to force the issue.

A rural North Texas county that appears to be the first in the state to pass a data center moratorium has rescinded the measure after being sued by a developer for $100 million in damages.

The Hill County Commissioners on Thursday voted unanimously to end the moratorium and adopt a checklist it will require of data center developers, just two weeks after initially instating the temporary pause of up to one year.

County Judge Shane Brassell said he still considers the moratorium a success and said he believes the checklist is on firmer legal ground.

“Ultimately, we would have loved to have just been able to stop every project and everything, and that’s not what the moratorium did,” Brassell said. “But what it did do was — some projects that were less desirable, as far as maybe not the most honest — they left the county.”

He added that it bought them extra time to put together the checklist and learn more about other projects that they didn’t previously know about.

[…]

RCM Hill, LLC, filed a lawsuit against the county last week in which it said it has existing contracts to buy more than 800 acres of land for more than $80 million of development on a data center project. Attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Their suit, filed May 27 in federal court in Austin, argues that the county “exceeded its lawful powers” in passing the moratorium, which threatened their ability to meet standards set by state electricity regulators needed to petition for interconnection.

See here for the background. I applaud the effort, and I totally understand why they backed down. A small county like that has no hope against that kind of money. And that’s a big part of the overall story of why people really dislike these things – they suck up a ton of resources, have no real checks on them, and have their hands out for tax cuts in the process. At least Hill County tried.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Of course they’ve lined up behind Bo French

What did you expect?

Gov. Greg Abbott said Bo French would “wreck” Texas oil and gas production as he urged voters to support Railroad Commissioner Jim Wright.

Wright’s fellow commissioners, Christi Craddick and Wayne Christian, also endorsed Wright over the hardline French, who has drawn widespread criticism for his social media remarks on Jews. So did Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham.

Despite that, they all lined up behind French in the hours after his runoff victory Tuesday, one of the tightest races of the night.

“Republicans are UNITED and ready to win in November to keep Texas, TEXAS!” Abbott’s campaign wrote in a post on X. A spokesman added in a statement: “Unity drives victory, and with this united front, Republicans will crush the socialist Democrats’ dream of turning Texas blue.”

French faces state Rep. Jon Rosenthal, a Houston Democrat, in November.

Just one notable Republican has so far not gotten behind French. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who was among his harshest critics, has so far remained silent on his victory.

The lieutenant governor called for voters to come together as a “unified Republican Party” on Wednesday, but he did not mention French by name. Patrick did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday.

In June, Patrick called for French’s resignation as chair of the Tarrant County GOP after French posted a poll on X asking followers whether Jews or Muslims were a bigger threat.

“Bo French’s words do not reflect my values nor the values of the Republican Party,” Patrick wrote. “Antisemitism and religious bigotry have no place in Texas.”

After his runoff victory, French said he had received messages of support from every other candidate on Republicans’ statewide slate, which also includes Mayes Middleton and Nate Sheets, the GOP nominees for attorney general and agriculture commissioner.

“They have all reached out or endorsed since our victory and made it clear we are running together as a ticket to defeat the radical left in November,” French wrote.

The quick turn from critics to backers comes as Abbott and other state leaders are pushing hard for a united GOP front ahead of what many expect to be a bruising midterm for the party.

Patrick has since come around. I suspect when he made that statement about Bo French’s words not “reflecting his values”, he never thought he’d have to put those values of his to a real test. Oops. Again I say, what did you expect?

Perhaps this means we’ll get more stories about who the candidates are for Railroad Commissioner, and not just the usual boilerplate about how the Commission has nothing to do with trains.

In 2022, Sarah Stogner ran an insurgent Republican primary campaign for a seat on the Railroad Commission of Texas.

Despite its name, the commission is the powerful agency that regulates oil and gas in the state. Riding a wave of discontent over abandoned oil wells and groundwater contamination, Stogner surprised many when she forced incumbent Republican Commissioner Wayne Christian into a primary runoff.

She said it was only then that her campaign hired political consultants.

“They told me: ‘OK, you need to be talking about the [border] wall. You need to be talking about abortion. You need be talking hot button topics,” Stogner remembered. “I said, ‘Absolutely not.'”

Instead, she kept hammering Christian on toxic air emissions, oilfield earthquakes and other issues related to oil and gas.

She lost the primary runoff by 30 percentage points.

“If I’d talked about abortion and the wall, I might have had a better shot,” Stogner, who now serves as district attorney for Texas’ 143rd Judicial District, speculated with no apparent regret.

She shared that story to explain the upset victory of Bo French, former chair of the Tarrant County GOP, over incumbent Railroad Commissioner Jim Wright. It was a primary that divided Republicans and the state’s powerful oil and gas industry.

[…]

State Rep. Jon Rosenthal is the Democratic nominee. He entered the race expecting to run against Wright in the general election, and he had a plan for how to do that.

“I was going to hit him on self-dealing and having conflicts of interest,” Rosenthal said recently.

French’s upset victory has changed all that.

The oil and gas industry has a long and controversial history of helping pick winners in Railroad Commission elections, and Rosenthal hopes the new campaign landscape may help him.

“Normally, the lobby and big business will line up with an incumbent,” he said. “It’s become an open seat race and I can vie for that support.”

To do that, Rosenthal said he has been talking with people in the oil and gas industries.

His message: Bo French is a “chaos candidate” who — echoing the words of Texas’ Republican governor — “really does pose a threat to the health of our energy production in Texas.”

“I think I’ll be good for business,” Rosenthal said. “For someone to run on an Islamophobic platform where they’re going after companies just because part of their ownership is from the Middle East, that’s bad for business.”

Rosenthal, who expects there will be a lot of money pouring into both campaigns, said he is beginning those conversations with oil and gas stakeholders.

But, he concedes, he is starting from behind.

Yes, it would be nice for Rep. Rosenthal to raise enough money to make himself a bit more visible in this election. My belief that there will be more articles like these just means “more than zero”, not “enough to truly educate a significant number of voters”. That’s still going to be a function of campaigns and PACs. Whether the affected industry wants a chaos monkey as a regulator or not is another question.

Finally, the DMN has a nice feature story on Rep. Rosenthal.

Rep. Jon Rosenthal

When Bo French launched his campaign for the Texas Railroad Commission, Jon Rosenthal thought it was a joke.

Rosenthal, a Democratic state representative from Houston, had expected he’d face Republican Jim Wright, chairman of the three-member commission that regulates the state’s oil and gas industry.

[…]

Rosenthal, the Democratic nominee and a mechanical engineer who spent his career in the oil and gas industry, described French as a “chaos candidate” more interested in cultural fights than the commission’s work.

In an interview with The Dallas Morning News, Rosenthal said French is an agitator “hurling personal insults or cultural mischaracterizations” that have “nothing to do with the commission.”

“The case that I’ll make is I’m the industry expert,” he said.

[…]

In an interview Wednesday on Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast, French said his message reflects Republican voter priorities. “They want people who will fight the Islamification of Texas, they don’t want our government agencies to be politicized,” he said.

French also has begun portraying Rosenthal as a liberal threat. He recently posted a photo of Rosenthal wearing a face mask that read, “Protect Trans Children.”

“This is my opponent,” French posted. “Do you think he is going to make the oil and gas industry stronger or protect the Texas miracle?”

Rosenthal brushed aside the attacks, saying he intends to focus on energy policy. But he also vowed to force French to answer for his “grotesque racist, anti-Semitic, and Islamophobic rhetoric” through Election Day.

After French’s victory, Abbott’s campaign pivoted to party unity. A statement declaring Republicans “UNITED and ready to win in November” did not mention French by name. Patrick issued a similar statement that did not mention French but said the lieutenant governor endorsed all GOP nominees.

Rosenthal said the reversal was telling. “They have clearly shown their partisan politics outweigh their values,” he said.

Rosenthal said he plans to draw contrasts with French but doesn’t believe personal insults will decide the race. He said that approach could alienate independents and moderate voters.

“People are tired of the politics of division,” Rosenthal said. “The primary focus needs to be on the issues of the railroad commission.”

He plans to travel the state to explain that the commission no longer oversees railroads but serves as the state’s regulator of oil and gas production, pipeline safety and other energy matters.

He said he supports strengthening weatherization requirements for natural gas facilities after the deadly 2021 freeze exposed vulnerabilities in the system.

And he wants the commission to do more to manage oilfield wastewater and plug thousands of abandoned wells across the state.

“They’re faced with a physical impossibility that, clearly, we need to go after in a more focused way,” Rosenthal said.

It’s been awhile since the Republicans ran an RRC candidate who had any experience with the energy industry that wasn’t about connections and insider-ness, while Dems have run credible candidates like Rosenthal in most elections. Hasn’t made any difference yet, but this is an opportune year and you would be hard-pressed to find a worse person or candidate than Bo French. Will that be enough? Here’s one more thing, from that TPR story:

Stogner, who ran as a Republican four years ago, said she will vote for the Democrat this election.

“I personally know a lot of lifelong Republicans that are just not gonna cast a ballot,” she said. “They are over the current Republican party.”

Tell your friends to tell their friends, Sarah Stogner, and for them to tell theirs, and so on. If they want to see Bo French not get elected, that is.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A followup on Mike Miles’ moneymaker

I appreciate the Chron looking into the potential consequences of Mike Miles’ earning outside consultant money while serving as HISD Superintendent, in violation of a recent state law. I’m skipping over the part of the story where they recapped the earlier reporting done by the Texas Observer – click that link for those details – and jumping in where it picks up.

The state law barring outside education consulting does not name who is responsible for enforcement. But, generally, the Texas Attorney General has the default authority to enforce civil penalties and could pursue legal action after the office received a complaint, said Thomas Hogan, an assistant professor at South Texas College of Law Houston.

He said a citizen or entity could bring concerns of a violation to the Texas Attorney General’s Office, or the TEA could refer it to the attorney general if the agency was aware of a violation. From there, the attorney general’s office would decide whether to pursue it in the courts.

Hogan said when he was an advisor to government agencies and a prosecutor, he and others he worked with always made it clear who the enforcing agency was. He said that state lawmakers sometimes draft a law to curb certain behavior, but leave enforcement vague and assume agencies will figure it out.

“You want to specify it so that people don’t end up playing political hot potato with it,” Hogan said.

If a district administrator pays back any financial benefit, that does not change whether a violation occurred under the law, said Hogan, who was commenting about the law in general and not about Miles’ records of payment.

“It might affect the enforcing agency’s discretion as to whether or not they wanted to pursue the violation, but it’s still a violation,” Hogan said.

A school district or board could still take employment action, such as discipline or termination, if an administrator sought financial benefit for outside work in violation of the law, said Keith Butcher, a professor of educational leadership at the University of Houston.

“It’s interesting that this particular law creates a civil penalty, meaning liable to the state, but it doesn’t assign the enforcement authority,” Butcher said.

[…]

State Rep. Lauren Ashley Simmons, a Democrat for southwest Houston, said Miles’ consulting payments raise questions about how to enforce the law in districts under a state takeover, where the TEA appoints the superintendent instead of an elected board.

“This may have to be something that we have to take another look at to say: OK, in special cases … does there need to be a third party involved in this aspect of it?” said Simmons, a former teachers union organizer.

[…]

State Board of Education member Staci Childs, a Democrat representing Harris and Galveston counties, said she hoped officials are “willing to pursue this to the fullest extent” and that, her constituents want an elected board and a new superintendent to run HISD.

“He should have just stayed at Third Future Schools, if that’s what he wanted to do,” she said.

Again, read the earlier reporting done by the Texas Observer for the background. My contribution was to look up the text of the law in question to find that “An administrator who violates this section is liable to the state for a civil penalty in the amount of $10,000 for each violation” and note, as this story does, that who enforces the law is not mentioned.

I would say, for those who might be interested in seeing some accountability here, that the first thing to do is to ask Nathan Johnson, the Democratic nominee for Attorney General, what he thinks about this. I hope that he would at least be willing to take a look at this once in office. You might also contact your State Rep and State Senator and ask them what their plans are. File a bill to clarify? File a complaint with the AG? Something else? And finally, ask your elected HISD Board member what they would like to do, both now – again, perhaps file a complaint with the AG, which should at least provoke some action – and later, when they have power. It may well be that in the end there’s little to nothing that can be done. But the more you talk about it now, the more options will be open later.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Corpus Christi kicks the can

I dunno, man.

A bitterly divided Corpus Christi City Council voted early Wednesday morning to delay a decision on reviving an almost billion-dollar water plant it had rejected nine months earlier.

The 7-2 vote came at 2:20 a.m., almost 15 hours into a meeting that drew extensive interest from residents who argued for and against building a desalination plant that council members voted down last year over environmental and cost concerns.

The proposed plant is not expected to begin delivering water until late 2029, but supporters fear that without long-term supplies, the city’s economy will freeze, driving away residents and businesses and crippling the important tourism industry.

Opponents expressed deep concern about the proposed plant’s impact on Corpus Christi Bay, and some doubted the fairness of an environmental study that concluded the plant’s salty discharge would not affect sea life.

The coastal city, Texas’ eighth largest city, is staring down a persistent drought that has placed it on course to being the first U.S. city to run short of water sometime next year. Desalination — the process of turning seawater drinkable — has been seen by some as the cure to get the city through future dry spells.

Wednesday morning’s vote delayed action until Sept. 1, about a year after the council abandoned the initial effort to build the Inner Harbor plant.

“You’re asking us to go out on a limb and I’m not comfortable with it,” said Council Member Gil Hernandez, who first suggested delaying the vote. Hernandez was among the five council members who voted last year to pull the plug on the project.

Several council members were also troubled by the water department’s inability to secure contracts with industrial companies to purchase water from the proposed plant.

[…]

The city’s water department, the mayor and some City Council members view the Inner Harbor Desalination Project as the key to a long-term, steady water supply capable of producing up to 30 million gallons of drinking water a day, even in a drought.

Last year, the same council members voted 5-4 to pull the plug on the Inner Harbor project after nearly decade of planning amid fierce criticism over potential harm to the Corpus Christi Bay’s ecosystem and the ballooning price tag — from $160 million when it was first approved in 2019 to $1.2 billion when the plant was abandoned in September.

Time and the heightening crisis have not changed the minds of project opponents, including many who voiced concerns about the impact on Corpus Christi Bay’s ecosystem.

“The question is: Do we want to be known as the city sucked up by Exxon, or the city that stood up to the people killing the planet?” Corpus Christi resident Guillermo Gallegos told the City Council.

Well, at least all the recent rain has pushed back the beginning of the crisis by a couple of months. Maybe another year or two of more of that might help. I think desalinization is the sort of thing you do when you don’t have other viable options. I’d want to see Corpus Christi make the industrial users pay for their fair share of the water first, but I’m not a voter there. Beyond that, I have no idea what they should do. Good luck, y’all. Here’s an earlier Trib story with more.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Checking in on HISD’s status

What have we gained and lost after three school years of the TEA takeover of HISD? The Chron did a deep dive.

Houston ISD’s state takeover began three years ago, when the Texas Education Agency ousted the elected leadership and appointed Superintendent Mike Miles and a nine-member board of managers to oversee the state’s largest school district.

Miles almost immediately launched the controversial New Education System reform model, which has since expanded to about 130 campuses. The NES model includes a standardized curriculum, less autonomy, higher pay for educators and additional support staff for teachers. Given the extra resources, it costs more per student than other HISD schools.

Under the takeover, HISD’s NES schools have seen dramatic improvement on the state’s A-F accountability ratings and growth on multiple state exams, including the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.

Some campuses have lost several academic and extracurricular programs as the district has rolled out other initiatives, like Sunrise Centers with free resources for families.

Bob Sanborn, president and CEO of the advocacy group Children at Risk, said the data shows students are performing better in a lot of schools, but recognizes that the changes have been difficult.

“I think the messenger and the way the message is delivered isn’t always the best way, and I think that obviously we would much rather have an elected school board who chooses a superintendent of their own choosing, not one of the state’s, but I think that you’ve seen really nice results,” Sanborn said.

[…]

Miles said on Houston Matters in May that enrollment declines are a national phenomenon, and he attributed losses in NES schools to several reasons, including economic mobility and immigration declines. In the Houston area, Miles said Aldine and Pasadena ISDs had larger percentage enrollment declines compared to HISD.

“NES has been a huge success, and the achievement is undeniable,” Miles said. “(At) the end of the day, parents want their kids to read, write, and do math more. … Kids and families are celebrating what is happening in those schools.”

Multiple parents, however, have told the Chronicle that they’ve pulled their child out of HISD largely due to dissatisfaction with Miles’ changes, including NES, the district’s standardized curriculum, and rising staff turnover.

Jessica Flores, a former HISD parent, said her daughter would regularly come home crying from third grade in Tijerina Elementary School due to stress. Even though it was not a designated NES campus, she said the school followed much of the NES model.

“They had no recreational time,” Flores said. “They were forced to do schoolwork from the moment the bell rang (in the morning) to the moment the bell rang at the end of the day. It was schoolwork, schoolwork, schoolwork, with no break. Just straight working out of packets.”

After watching her daughter’s mental health suffer, Flores hit her “breaking point.” She pulled her out of the classroom at the end of the 2024-25 school year and enrolled her in Pasadena ISD, where she’s thrived. Despite their new 30-minute drive from the East End to Pasadena, Flores said she doesn’t see a circumstance in which she would re-enroll in HISD.

That latter bit is from the section headlined “Student enrollment losses”; the other sections are “Academic improvements”, “Program gains, losses”, and “Teacher turnover”. This is a gift link so I encourage you to read the rest. There have been academic gains, which is both a good thing on its own and a good thing in that it’s necessary to get rid of Mike Miles, but there’s definitely a cost and there’s no guarantee these improvements will be persistent. I certainly have a hard time believing that the NES model will work long-term, and that’s before we talk about introducing a bunch of AI crap into the mix.

I will also note, once again, that a key ingredient to all this is right there in the second paragraph, where it reminds us that the NES model “costs more per student”. I am always amused and annoyed by the seldom-acknowledged fact that the ultimate solution here was to throw more money at the schools that needed it the most. Like, who would have ever thought of that? Especially now, as even the richest school districts across the state are being forced to cut back due to insufficient funding, which is only going to get worse thanks to voucher mania. But at least we’ll still have all the LLM-generated PowerPoint slides we can eat.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jane Nelson stepping down as Secretary of State

She was pretty mid at the job, and yet she was almost certainly the best we could have hoped for as long as Greg Abbott gets to pick.

Jane Nelson

Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson announced Tuesday she will resign effective July 17, capping off three and a half years as the state’s top election official.

“It has been my goal to ensure that voting in Texas is secure, accessible and fair,” Nelson said in a press release. “We have worked extensively to ensure accurate voter rolls and to educate voters about what they need to know to vote with confidence.”

The press release did not say why Nelson is resigning from her role. Her office did not respond to a request for comment.

By law, Gov. Greg Abbott is required to nominate someone to fill the vacant position “without delay.” It’s unclear how quickly Abbott will move to fill Nelson’s role or whom he is considering for the job.

[…]

During her time as the state’s top election official, Nelson’s office complied with the U.S. Department of Justice’s request for access to the state’s full voter roll, one of 15 states to do so. The data Nelson’s office handed over included identifiable information about the state’s 18 million registered voters, including dates of birth, driver’s license numbers, and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers. Election security experts and voting rights groups criticized the move,  saying it was a violation of voters’ privacy.

Nelson’s office also began using a federal database called Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, last year to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The state said the review identified 2,724 potential noncitizens on the voter roll, but county election officials later determined some of the flagged voters were actually citizens after all. In addition, they found that hundreds of the flagged voters had registered through the Texas Department of Public Safety, which requires proof of citizenship, such as a passport, and keeps copies of such documents on file.

Nelson’s use of SAVE has led to at least two lawsuits by voting rights groups who claim the database is inaccurate and could lead to the disenfranchisement of eligible voters. They also argued the state should have checked DPS records before sending the list of potential noncitizens to county election officials for investigation. Last month, Nelson’s office asked DPS to check the entire list of potential noncitizens against its driver’s license records.

The lawsuits are still pending in federal court.

In the past year, Nelson’s office has also come under scrutiny from county election officials following the overhaul of the state’s election management and voter registration system, known as TEAM.

Since its release a year ago, election officials have repeatedly asked Nelson’s office to fix the system’s functionality problems, which they say make completing already time-consuming voter registration tasks less efficient.

It’s like I said when she was first nominated. Jane Nelson was a serious legislator with strong policy chops, and at least didn’t give off wingnut Christian nationalist vibes. She had as noted above a mediocre tenure as SOS, some of which may be attributable to pressure from Greg Abbott and the overall election-denying fanaticism of too much of the modern Republican Party. And she’s likely the best we could have hoped for – just look at who’s being rumored to replace her for all the evidence you’ll need. We’re not going to do any better than Jane Nelson as SOS until we get a better Governor, that’s all there is to it.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

One million toad eggs

I love stories like this.

Houston Toad (Anaxyrus houstonensis)

More than 1 million Houston toad eggs have been released at Bastrop State Park this spring as part of efforts to reintroduce the endangered species after it disappeared from the park more than a decade ago.

Several organizations, including the Texas Parks and Wildlife and the Houston Zoo, have made efforts to reintroduce the Houston toad to the park outside Austin since 2015, four years after the Bastrop County Complex Wildfire, according to a TPWD news release. Attempts in 2015 and 2019 were deemed unsuccessful.

“We got close in 2019,” said Paul Crump, TPWD herpetologist, in a written statement. “But this is the most eggs released in a single year to date in the state park.”

Conservation partners got together last fall, pairing toads up strategically for 11 weeks, waiting till the eggs were ready, and then collecting and sorting them into bags to be transported to the release sites. Over several weeks, the eggs were taken to release sites, where they were released into a shallow pond to hatch and turn into toadlets.

“It was really remarkable to see how quickly the toadlets (from earlier releases) developed and moved into the surrounding habitat,” said Zach Truelock, a biologist with the Amphibian and Reptile Conservancy, in a written statement. “During a light rain, we saw them dispersing away from the pond into the savannah.”

“Pairing toads up strategically for 11 weeks”. I hope someone took very good notes in the planning meetings, because I would love to know more about the general toad-pairing strategy. I’m sure it has to do with genetic traits, but I think we’re all allowed to speculate a bit. The press release in question is here, and it notes that these toads have been listed as endangered since 1970, the year after the Endangered Species Conservation Act was passed, and that in addition to the usual suspects of over-development and climate change, feral hogs and red ants have played a role in the toads’ decline. There’s often a link between invasive species and endangered species. There are to be three toad egg drops, two in Bastrop County and one in Milam County. I’m rooting for them.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

As goes Hood County

So goes the battle to have some control over data centers.

This is just the beginning of the data center revolution in Hood County, a rural community of 62,000 people about an hour southwest of Fort Worth. Developers have proposed eight data centers spanning over 7,600 acres, or 12 square miles. While it’s unclear how much power all of the facilities would require, the Comanche Circle data center, plus two other smaller projects from the same developer, could use up to 3 gigawatts of electricity at full capacity, according to its developer — enough to power about 3 million homes. Some of the power could be generated by a new on-site gas plant, and some will likely come from the state’s power grid, according to the project’s concept plan.

Comanche Circle will need an initial one-time “flush and fill” starting next year of 95 million gallons of water for its seven-year buildout, and then 150,000 gallons per day — equivalent to the average use of 500 U.S. households, according to the minutes of the local water district board meeting where the developer made its request. In an email to The Texas Tribune, the developer said that the number submitted to the district board was incorrect and his three data centers combined would use “less than 50,000 gallons per day of groundwater” at full build out.

Hood County locals are relentless in their fight against the data centers, packing county meetings and town halls and voicing their fierce opposition to the facilities threatening to transform their charming, small-town community.

But, county officials say their hands are tied in their ability to stop or slow development. Two efforts by Hood County commissioners to pass a moratorium on data centers failed, as a state lawmaker warned they were acting outside of their authority. And the county has been sued twice by developers — after the commission rejected one data center’s concept plan, citing a lack of information about critical considerations like where they’d get their water from, and then tabled a vote on another.

“I was elected by the people to represent their opinion,” Kevin Andrews, a Hood County commissioner who has lived in the county for two decades, said in an interview. “But I also have to follow the law … and not get the county sued.”

Data center developers are more frequently choosing rural, unincorporated areas like Hood County because it’s an easier path to build, experts say. In Texas, counties typically don’t have the power to block development — unlike city officials who wield zoning authority.

“Texas has always viewed counties as rural toddlers that can’t be trusted with full powers,” said Robert Paterson, a professor at UT-Austin who specializes in land use and environmental planning.

Nearly half of the planned data centers in Texas are set to be built in unincorporated areas, free of city regulations, according to an analysis by the Tribune. This marks a shift as most existing data centers are clustered in cities and only 12% are currently in unincorporated areas.

At least one county, which appears to be the first in Texas, recently placed a one-year pause on data center construction, moving ahead despite the legal risks. The action has already prompted a lawsuit against Hill County and its three commissioners by a data center developer seeking $100 million in damages.

Today, Hood County has the sixth most planned data centers among Texas counties; per square mile, it ranks third. It’s been a magnet for developers because of the cheap land, available power, fiber lines and, importantly, its lack of local business restrictions.

“We love liberty and love a lack of regulation,” said Greg Harrell, chair of the Hood County GOP, at a town hall earlier this year. “Data centers are taking advantage of it… They saw an opportunity.”

[…]

The explosion of development is driven by the newest wave of data centers, known as “hyperscalers,” designed to support artificial intelligence computing facilities with thousands of servers, which are much bigger than current data centers that were largely built for cloud storage. Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Open AI are behind planned projects in West Texas and Central Texas.

“Texas is a great state to do business. All of that really has come together to help make Texas, again, one of the national leaders in digital infrastructure,” said Dan Diorio, vice president of state policy with the Data Center Coalition.

Data center developers say their projects will bring billions of dollars of new property on the tax rolls, work training opportunities, job creation and private investment in communities. One company told Hood County commissioners it could potentially increase the county’s tax base anywhere from $5 billion to $20 billion.

However, some commissioners and residents remain skeptical, saying the benefits are uneven, and data centers create few permanent jobs after their labor-intensive construction is finished. For example, one Hood County data center proposal shows a peak construction workforce of 2,000 dropping to a permanent workforce of 220, according to the project’s concept plan.

Hood County Commissioner Dave Eagle said there are “too many unanswered questions” about data centers, and they’re being asked to greenlight plans with incomplete information about their impact on the community.

The Tribune reviewed hundreds of pages of concept plans, lawsuits and reviewed hours of testimony from commissioners court meetings to piece together information about the projects. All but one of the seven data center proposals submitted to Hood County omitted estimates for power use; only four noted a potential power source. Just five of the concept plans included projections for water consumption and six listed options for where they would get their water. The eighth project was annexed into the City of Granbury, which had not received any development plans, according to a spokesperson.

Despite the backlash from residents, some Hood County commissioners are increasingly convinced there’s little they can do to stop data centers as more proposals roll in.

“[Data centers] snuck up on us,” Eagle said at a town hall meeting in February. “We don’t understand it and we need more information.”

There’s a lot more, so read the rest. I’ve been writing about data centers for awhile and the various ways their construction has caused disruption and discontent. A lot of this is happening in red rural counties, which is an obvious political problem for Republicans. It’s worse for counties than for cities, which have more legal leeway, at least for now. It’s also happening in the same places where cryptomining has been causing more problems. The residents in these places have a very legitimate complaint about not being heard.

I continue to see this as an issue for Democrats to run on. In this story, some of the resistance is coming from the local Republican Party Chair and from the Republican candidate for County Judge, who is aiming to succeed the retiring incumbent. But it’s the Legislature and its uncaring outsiders like the ubiquitous Paul Bettencourt that are putting the boot on them – while providing big tax breaks to the rapacious data center owners – and the best they can get from the likes of Greg Abbott and Dan Patrick is some vague talk about looking into the issue. I really want to see the big three of Talarico, Hinojosa, and Goodwin showing up in places like Hood County to say “the current crew isn’t listening to you and only cares about the big money interests that want to bulldoze all your land, but we hear you and we will work with you”. It’s an opportunity that we can’t afford to miss.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Paxton divorce trial canceled

Bummer, at least for those of us who would have enjoyed a spectacle.

Still a crook any way you look

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and his wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, have canceled their scheduled divorce trial just weeks before it was set to begin.

According to Collin County court records, the trial was scheduled to start on June 24. Court records now show the trial has been canceled by the judge, though no reason for the move was immediately provided.

After nearly four decades of marriage, Angela Paxton originally announced she had filed for divorce in July 2025. In a statement on social media, she cited “recent discoveries” and said she was seeking divorce “on biblical grounds.”

Ken Paxton later acknowledged the filing and asked for privacy.

The divorce proceedings were initially sealed, but the couple agreed last December to unseal the records after media organizations, including The Texas Newsroom, challenged the decision. Limited personal information remained redacted.

Laura Roach and Jared Julian, attorneys for Ken Paxton, said in a statement on Tuesday that the couple has made progress toward resolving the case without the need of a public trial.

“The parties have made substantial progress toward an amicable resolution of all issues and remain engaged in productive discussions,” the statement read. “We are optimistic that a final agreement will be reached in the near future.”

See here for the background. It turned out that the records that both sides had originally fought for months to keep sealed were a big ol’ nothingburger, so it may well have been that the trial would have been a dud as well. But come on, the universe owed us all some Falcon Crest-level messiness and drama, and now it seems like we won’t get it. You’ll forgive me if my first instinct is to pout about it. The Chron has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Hollywood monument of Rockwall County

From The Slacktivist:

Whenever you see a “Ten Commandments” monument, the first thing to check is whether it comes from the Bible or if, instead, it comes from the Fraternal Order of Eagles and Hollywood director Cecil B. DeMille.The two telltale signs are: 1) The Eagles/DeMille version is not enumerated and usually offers a decalog of 11 or 12 commandments; and 2) The Eagles/DeMille version uses a King James Version pastiche that garbles the “graven images” bit as “Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven images.”

The newly installed Ten Commandments monument at the Rockwall County Courthouse in Texas is not the biblical Ten Commandments. It is the Fraternal Order of Eagles version.

You would think that it might matter to devout Christians intent on “bringing back the Bible” that this monument is something other than and different from the Bible. But it does not seem to matter to them. That is, at the very least, odd.

Given that Rockwall County is more than 60% Baptist, you might also think that people there would revere the central tenet of Baptists, which is the separation of church and state. But no. These are Southern Baptists and Texas Southern “Baptists” at that, and if they even slightly came to understand the implications of voluntary believers’ baptism they would reject it in a heartbeat and start practicing infant baptism the next day.

If you’re going to put up a monument with words from the Eagles then it’d be better to just go with the lyrics to “Desperado.” Or maybe just “Go Birds.” (I’d love to see that outside of a Texas courthouse.)

Rockwall County is in the greater Dallas area, so that would definitely be A Thing. You should click on that Friendly Atheist link for more details, but just knowing that they used a fake version of the Ten Commandments without being aware of it is pretty damn funny. Everyone involved deserves to be roundly mocked for it.

Note that this is separate from the force feeding of the Ten Commandments to the schools, but they do have one thing in common, and that’s authenticity. See, the official state version of the Ten Commandments that are being foisted into classrooms around the state are not the Ten Commandments that I as a Catholic school boy was taught in the 70s. We only had three commandments pertaining to The Lord Thy God – the “honor your father and mother” one was Commandment #4, “don’t kill” was #5, and so on – and two commandments at the end about coveting, one for your neighbor’s wife and one for your neighbor’s possessions. (*) I once tried to explain this to a conservative type who was not a Catholic, and she had no earthly idea what I was talking about. I couldn’t have made my point about why the Ten Commandments are not some neutral, universal thing that we can all relate to any better, if only she had been able to understand it.

(*) Specifically, the Tenth Commandment as I learned it was “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s ass”, which somehow didn’t cause us all to giggle in the classroom. Later on, as we got closer to the age where we would receive the sacrament of Confirmation (seventh grade), there would be jokes about not coveting thy neighbor’s wife’s ass. CCD teachers were not amused by these jokes.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Fighting back on multiple fronts

I approve.

Still a crook any way you look

The top Democrats on three U.S. House committees are going after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, accusing him of ignoring consumer complaints about the Republican organization WinRed’s online fundraising tactics, while filing a lawsuit against the site’s Democratic counterpart ActBlue.

The lawmakers — U.S. Reps. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, Robert Garcia of California and Joseph Morelle of New York — have demanded his office turn over any documents related to complaints about WinRed’s use of a pre-checked box to draw repeated campaign donations from donors without their knowledge.

“While you have done nothing to investigate dozens of such complaints from Texans about being defrauded by WinRed, the platform used to process campaign contributions to Republican candidates and political committees, your office has opened an investigation into an unrelated entity, ActBlue, which processes donations to Democratic candidates and causes,” the lawmakers said in a letter to Paxton, who on Tuesday became the Texas Republican nominee for U.S. Senate.

The letter cites a May 12 report by Hearst Newspapers that 27 complaints had been filed with Paxton’s office against WinRed, a platform he and other Texas Republicans use to raise campaign funds. Several complainants told Hearst that they had received no acknowledgement from the attorney general’s office, despite some saying that the fundraising platform had siphoned much of their life savings from their bank accounts.

The letter, signed by Raskin of the House Judiciary Committee, Garcia of the Oversight and Government Reform and Morelle of the Administration Committee, asks Paxton to turn over complaints and related internal communications by June 8. However, because Democrats are in the minority in the House, they have no formal power to force compliance by Paxton or his office.

[…]

Hearst Newspapers found that Paxton’s office had received dozens of complaints over recent years about WinRed from Texans, or family members on their behalf, who suspected the pre-checked box had allowed the platform to continue charging them for months, or even years. One donor said $15,000 had been taken from her account without her knowledge; another said nearly $11,000 had been taken from his account before he had noticed the missing funds.

“Didn’t realize they were sucking my life savings out of my bank account,” Charlene Allmon, 87, said in her complaint.

Paxton’s office received similar complaints about ActBlue, although there were fewer. One disabled, 83-year-old Vietnam War veteran told Paxton’s office that he had racked up $4,600 in costs and hundreds of dollars in overdraft fees from unnoticed monthly donations.

In 2021, following a New York Times investigation into political organizations using pre-checked boxes for recurring donations, the Federal Election Commission urged Congress to outlaw the practice. So far, Congress has not acted on the recommendation.

ActBlue has since forbidden candidates from pre-checking recurring donation boxes unless donors already agreed to set up repeated contributions. WinRed has not.

It’s a gift link, so read the rest. This isn’t about whether Reps. Raskin, Morelle, and Garcia are able to drag Ken Paxton before a committee to testify. In the world we are hoping for, while they will be in the majority, Paxton will be out of office, and there will be higher priorities. This is about fighting against vermin like Paxton on as many fronts as possible. Bring every aspect of his lawless behavior to light, and make sure the people who might not know much about him as well as the people who should know better are fully informed. Just making the effort is worth it, because the rest of us want to see elected Dems engage in these battles. Now don’t let this be a one-and-done. Keep up the pressure, and get your friends involved, too.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Three Flock stories

From Bandera:

After months of discussion and outrage from residents, the city council of the tiny town of Bandera, Texas voted 3-2 to immediately end its contract with the surveillance company Flock. In the aftermath of the vote, one of the dissenting council members crashed out and said he would be introducing measures to ban cell phones, the internet, cameras, and nearly all technology in the town of roughly 900 people.

Bandera had a state grant to install eight Flock Safety AI license plate reader cameras in the tiny town. The technology proved to be incredibly controversial, with residents repeatedly turning out to city council meetings to say that they did not want government surveillance in the town; the poles that the cameras were installed on were repeatedly destroyed by vandals in protest, leading the town to have to replace them at their own expense. Last week, the town formally decided to abandon its contract with Flock entirely.

After the vote, Councilmember Jeff Flowers, a staunch Flock supporter, said that if people in the town wanted privacy then the city council should basically ban all technology, essentially calling people who did not want government surveillance hypocrites. Flowers said he would propose a series of new regulations at an upcoming city council meeting, which he is calling the “Bandera Declaration of Digital Independence.” In a letter posted by the local newspaper, the Bandera Bulletin, Flowers said that in the name of preserving privacy he would suggest the city go back to the days of 1880.

“For months, I have listened to the outcry regarding License Plate Recognition (LPR) technology. I have seen the eyerolls, and I’ve even been met with ‘Nazi rhetoric,’ the dangerous claim that believing in accountability and community safety is somehow equivalent to totalitarianism,” Flowers wrote. “Comparing a neighbor’s desire for a safe street to a dark chapter of history is a classic case of comparing apples to oranges; it is a distraction used to avoid the reality of the threats our town faces today.”

Flowers said that at the next city council meeting he will propose “a total ban on all cellular and GPS-capable devices for all operations within city limits. If we are to be truly ‘private,’ we must leave our smartphones at the city line.” He will also propose “a total ban on outward facing cameras,” and “a total termination of all internet services and electronic record-keeping. We are going back to 1880, paper ledgers and cash only.”

[…]

Bandera had eight Flock cameras installed. At the meeting last week where the town voted to end the Flock contract, residents noted that Bandera has one of the lowest crime rates in the state. Other residents noted that people in the town kept cutting down the poles the Flock cameras are installed on, leading the town to continually spend money and time to replace them. Residents said they felt like they made it clear that they do not want the cameras in the town, but that the town had dragged its feet on actually ending the contract.

“This is the fifth meeting [about Flock]. How many more meetings are we going to have to have before we get to the idea that we don’t need the Flock system?” one resident said in the meeting last week. “How many more meetings is it going to take before we understand the community didn’t vote for this? They don’t want it. How many more times are the cameras going to have to get cut down before somebody realizes it’s not worth the money? It’s coming to a point where we’re going to have to have meetings until we’re all dead […] By putting the cameras back up [after they’ve been cut down], you’re basically baiting someone else to come cut them down or shoot them down, you’re basically causing an issue because we didn’t vote for it.”

Another resident said Flock “doesn’t pass the vibe check. Bandera is the cowboy capital of the world. We don’t need to implement mass government surveillance in our town.”

See here for previous blogging on Flock. A tad bit defensive is CM Flowers, I’d say. I don’t condone cutting down the cameras – that could be dangerous to yourself and to others, and however justifiably mad one may be at the foot-dragging in this case, it’s a terrible precedent to set. I’m glad the residents of this tiny town northwest of San Antonio finally got what they were demanding.

From Troy, New York:

The civic uproar began quietly, when a mom walking her newborn spotted a strange black contraption at the end of her block: a camera topped with a solar panel.

Dierdre Shea researched the camera and learned that it was an artificial-intelligence-assisted license plate reader — the type that have caused privacy concerns across the country in recent months, leading to laws limiting their use in more than a dozen states.

She emailed her neighbors, sparking fierce debate in this town of 52,000 overlooking the Hudson River. Residents called for the devices to be taken off the streets, and the Republican mayor, who supports the cameras, clashed with the Democratic city council, which tried to halt funding for them.

Last month, Mayor Carmella Mantello, flanked by officers in blue, accused the city council of “defunding” the police and declared a state of emergency to keep the cameras running, a designation usually reserved for floods and blizzards.

“I will not put our city in jeopardy and take these cameras away,” she said.

Sounds like Council Member Flowers has a kindred spirit in upstate New York. The article is behind a paywall and the excerpt above is from the email newsletter I get from the WaPo, so that’s all I have on that. A bit of googling shows that a compromise has been reached on Flock’s data collection, so that’s something. It’s wild to me how much some public officials – as well as members of the public – seem to think these things will make a meaningful dent in crime. Putting aside all of the extremely amoral and despotic things that Flock’s cameras have been used to do to non-criminals, what evidence is there that the use of these cameras has a significant effect on the crime rate? I don’t see it.

Not everyone is under the spell. Here’s San Marcos City Council Member Amanda Rodriguez on how that town turned around on Flock.

ALPRs are cameras that capture and store license plate information in a database, which can then be accessed by law enforcement. With coverage in 49 states across a network of over 90,000 cameras, Flock Safety is one of the most prolific ALPR companies in the country. Flock not only provides the equipment but also the software and database that law enforcement agencies can run license plates against. Each time a law enforcement agency runs a search, it should be logged and tagged with the reason for the search, but the company’s lax policies mean that doesn’t always happen.

Recent investigative reporting has found all kinds of dubious justifications unrelated to crime prevention, from No Kings protest attendance to out-of-state travel by a Texas woman seeking abortion care and immigration enforcement. Here in Texas, our state police were early adopters of Flock and other surveillance technology for immigration enforcement purposes as part of Texas’s abusive and deadly mass deportation apparatus, Operation Lone Star.

Recent reporting has also revealed troubling lapses in data security after a number of police departments revealed their logs, publicly identifying millions of surveillance targets. You can check to see if you are one of them at HaveIBeenFlocked.com, a website Flock has fervently tried to take down. After months of bad publicity, many Flock customers decided they’d had enough. Even Ring chose to end its Flock partnership after the disastrous, out-of-touch Super Bowl ad.

Last June, my colleagues and I on the San Marcos City Council did the same, voting to let our Flock contract lapse in December 2025. So why did we make that decision, and how were we able to overcome the pushback in the name of public safety?

While the world witnessed mass immigration sweeps and blatant law enforcement collaboration with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in large cities throughout 2025, the situation in San Marcos was different but still not entirely insulated from the national landscape of horror. My community was afraid that the violence we saw on our screens could soon be replicated here. The council decided to be proactive and look for tangible ways to deprive the mass deportation machine of the local infrastructure on which it so heavily relies.

Nothing happens on our city council without first hearing from the community. When we started probing the contract renewal, we heard from both sides. We heard from those who shared concerns about the indiscriminate collection of personal data that could be accessed by law enforcement nationwide, Flock’s shoddy business practices, the erosion of probable cause and due process, and, of course, Flock’s collaboration with ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

We also heard from our local police department with concerns about how they would keep residents and businesses safe without Flock. Flock was viewed as just one tool in the department’s toolbox, and they asked us to trust that they would protect our data, when even the company could not provide those guarantees. However, the community’s concern was not just with the local departments’ use of the Flock system but more broadly with Flock’s historically poor management of the data with which it is entrusted.

It should go without saying that everyone wants our community to be a safe place to build a life. We carefully considered all of this feedback on the council and ultimately decided to end the contract. Critically, Flock had been in the news for months, receiving almost exclusively bad press thanks to the dogged efforts of investigative journalists across the country. That coverage and other communities’ persistent fight against Flock showed what our critics falsely called hyperbole as reality. Responding to the horrors already taking place with this software allowed us to reframe the issue around our residents’ due process and privacy rights, speaking to concerns beyond Flock’s collaboration with ICE or the potential misuse of the system.

In short, our motivations may have varied, but the council ultimately coalesced around a belief that renewing the Flock contract was not in our city’s best interest.

Good for them. Maybe there’s a case for these things, with proper safeguards in place for civil liberties and data privacy. That’s not how they’ve been presented, and that’s not been the experience. There’s no reason to trust as a result. Keep on pushing back.

Posted in Technology, science, and math, The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

MLB takes another swing at India

Interesting.

Photo courtesy of MLB India

At India’s first MLB Cup in 2021 — an under-11 competition — only 12 teams took part. In a country obsessed with cricket and soccer, it was difficult to find the necessary coaches and ballplayers ready to come out and hit the field.

Just a few years later and the tournament has exploded. At last year’s MLB Cup, 150 teams took part with hopes for an additional 30-plus clubs to enter the competition this year. Not only that, the tourney has expanded to now include an under-13 age group, allowing those kids who played in the first tournaments a chance to continue playing baseball.

That grassroots growth and commitment to baseball across the country helped lead to Wednesday’s announcement that MLB has partnered with RISE Worldwide (Reliance Initiative for Sports and Entertainment) to deliver fan experiences, digital content, and a live event in Mumbai this October.

“This partnership is a key milestone in MLB’s international growth strategy,” said Noah Garden, Deputy Commissioner, Business & Media. “Working with RISE will allow us to introduce the excitement of baseball to even wider audiences while strengthening cultural connections through sport.”

“India is one of the most dynamic sports markets in the world, and baseball’s global rise makes this a natural moment to bring the sport closer to Indian fans,” a spokesperson from RISE Worldwide said. “RISE Worldwide is happy to partner with MLB to create experiences, on the ground and beyond, that make baseball accessible and exciting for audiences across the country.”

As the World Baseball Classic has shown, baseball is fast becoming a truly global sport and India is one of the countries that could one day lead the way. Since MLB first opened an office in India in 2019, they’ve introduced the MLB Cup, brought MLB’s First Pitch program to schools in Delhi, Mumbai, and Bengaluru – the three biggest cities in India – and have helped produce a pair of documentaries: “Indian Baseball Dreams,” about Blue Jays prospect Arjun Nimmala’s Indian heritage and “Hot Shots,” which featured cricket icon Shikhar Dhawan and MLB All-Star Adam Jones in the search for the country’s best amateur cricket and baseball players. MLB postseason games have been broadcast on Indian channels — and with Indian broadcasters.

There’s more, so read the rest. It’s a press release so it’s not the most compelling thing, but I am interested to see if something comes of this. I found the link via Craig Calcaterra’s Cup of Coffee News, which tells me what RISE Worldwide is (spoiler alert: a gigantic Indian petrochemical conglomerate) and speculates a bit about MLB’s interest in this partnership.

As for baseball in India: I don’t know much about it outside of the story of Rinku Singh and Dinesh Patel who, back in 2008, won a pitching contest on a reality show that resulted in them signing minor league contracts with the Pittsburgh Pirates and having their story turned into the 2014 Jon Hamm vehicle “Million Dollar Arm.” There has been some form of amateur baseball in India since the 1980s but it doesn’t seem to be particularly developed. MLB has been sniffing around there since the late teens, though this initiative is by far the most serious thing they’ve done there.

Maybe MLB is assuming that because cricket is so huge there that there is an appetite for another bat-and-ball sport. Maybe it’s just a “well, they have a billion people, and even if this gets no bigger than a niche of a niche of a niche there’s a few million bucks in it for us” sort of deal. Maybe they’re looking for a way to go into business with Reliance Industries Limited and this seemed to be the best way to get them to return their emails. Maybe they’re just looking to sell caps and jerseys. I don’t know and I don’t think MLB would ever really say even if you asked them.

I lean towards the second choice, that this is a big enough market that even a small bump in interest there could mean a lot of new eyeballs and customers. If this does stick around, it might be a decade or so before you see a payoff in the form of Indian prospects in the minor leagues, but if it does get to that then at least from the teams’ perspective that will have been worthwhile.

Posted in Around the world, Baseball | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of June 1

The TPA would like to congratulate the Republicans’ eight-year-old strategist who came up with “Talafreako” as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Off the Kuff shares some post-runoff thoughts.

SocraticGadfly had two post-runoff takes, one on The Art of No Deal and the other on Strangeabbott’s shrinking coattails.

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project reported the John Cornyn Houston Office Protest will continue despite Cornyn’s runoff defeat. The purpose has always been for people to see others like themselves standing openly & confidently for democracy no matter aggression of the right. Cornyn’s loss does nothing to change the mission.

===========================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

The Current rounds up the Republican website purge of anti-Paxton attacks.

City of Yes reminds us that no one is ever given the opportunity to vote on highway projects.

The Barbed Wire reports on the harassment and vandalization of Black-owned bookstores in Texas.

Law Dork notes the SPLC’s attempt to get the bogus charges against it dismissed.

G. Elliott Morris deems the Texas Senate election a tossup.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TPOR: Talarico 47, Paxton 44

This is a slightly weird one.

Rep. James Talarico

Texas Public Opinion Research (TPOR) today released a new poll of likely Texas general election voters, surveying their attitudes on the 2026 races for U.S. Senate, Governor, and Attorney General.

The survey of 1,670 likely voters was conducted from May 27 to May 28, 2026, and has a margin of error of ±2.8 percentage points. The full topline is available here, and crosstabs are available upon request.

[…]

James Talarico (47%) leads Ken Paxton (44%) by 3 points in the race for U.S. Senate. Seven percent of voters remain undecided. Among those undecided voters pushed to choose today, 19% lean toward Paxton and 17% toward Talarico with 13% leaning toward Libertarian Ted Brown and 50% still not sure.

Almost a third of Cornyn runoff voters say that they would vote for Talarico over Paxton in November. Among voters who supported John Cornyn in the Republican Senate runoff, only 44% say that they now plan to vote for Ken Paxton in the general election. 30% say they would vote for Talarico and 23% are either undecided or would not vote in the race.

Black voters opt for Talarico, white and Latino voters are split. Talarico leads Paxton with Black voters by a 38-point margin (64% to 26%). When it comes to Latino voters however, the race is currently within the margin of error—42% say they would support Talarico, while 46% say they would support Paxton. 10% of Latino voters are still undecided. Among white voters, the race is a dead heat. 46% say they plan to vote for Paxton compared to 45% for Talarico.

Moderate voters in Texas break decisively for Talarico. Talarico leads Paxton among voters who identify as moderate by a 57-point margin (72% to 15%). Among voters who identify as “somewhat conservative” 66% intend to vote for Paxton while 18% plan to vote for Talarico. When asked which candidate is closer to their own political views, voters pick Talarico 43% to 41%. Talarico leads on this measure with moderates (64% to 13%) and independents (57% to 19%), and pulls 11% of somewhat conservative voters. 24% of voters describe Talarico as a “moderate” while 75% of voters view Paxton as very or somewhat conservative.

Talarico leads Paxton by 43 points with independents. Among independent voters in Texas, Talarico leads Paxton 64% to 21% with 11% undecided.

Affordability and cost of living ranks as the top issue voters want elected officials to prioritize, and they trust Talarico to help. With 23% of voters citing it as their first priority, more than double any other issue, affordability is the defining concern in the state. Voters say Talarico better understands the economic challenges facing working Texans than Paxton (45% to 40%), and that he will do more to lower costs and improve the financial situation of everyday Texans than Paxton (44% to 40%).

The educational divide is one of the sharpest splits in the race. Talarico leads college-educated voters by 30 points while Paxton holds a 21-point advantage among non-college voters in Texas.

Paxton is the second most unpopular major political figure tested… after John Cornyn. Paxton’s net favorability stands at -19 (38% favorable, 57% unfavorable). He trails Donald Trump (-3 net), Greg Abbott (-6 net), and even a generic “Republican candidate running for office” (+6 net) by wide margins. Talarico holds the second highest net favorability rating of all figures tested at net +7 (47% favorable, 40% unfavorable). Notably, Gina Hinojosa leads all figures tested at +16 net favorability, though 38% of voters remain unfamiliar with her.

The poll also finds Greg Abbott leading Gina Hinojosa 46-41, and Mayes Middleton leading Nathan Johnson for AG by 44-39. I appreciate the inclusion of other statewide races and hope other polls do that going forward. The insights highlighted above are mostly about the Talarico-Paxton matchup, with the exception of noting that Abbott leads Hinojosa among Latinos by 2, and Hinojosa leads Abbott among Black voters by 32.

The numbers among the different racial groups are hard to understand. The finding that Paxton and Abbott are leading among Latino voters flies in the face of other polls and pretty much everything we know about the state of the electorate today. Black voters going nearly thirty percent for a Republican candidate would be a five-alarm fire nationwide for Democrats – we would be talking about a massive red wave this November if that were a true reflection of how things are. I assume this is a small sample matter, perhaps for both subsamples but surely for the Black subsample, and we are highly unlikely to see anything like it in other polls.

By the same token, for white voters to support Dems at the same level as Republicans would be a massive catastrophe for the GOP, and would also be in stark contrast with national polling. In my writeup of the previous TPOR poll, I talked about how Talarico trailing by 12-15 points among white voters was already an improvement worth noting. (Note how Talarico was leading by over 50 points among Black voters against both Paxton and Cornyn in that poll, too.) Democrats are doing better among white voters these days in part because of gains among college-educated voters and in part because of overall Trump revulsion, but an even split is a lot more than I’d expect. I have to wonder what the Governor and AG results would look like if the crosstabs were less wonky.

It’s wild to end up with a result that’s in line with others when the subsamples are that out of whack, but over the course of many years and however many dozens of polls, I’ve seen it before. As we say, it’s one data point and we try to see the bigger picture where we can. This is the first poll to be done entirely after May 26, and I expect there to be more of those rolling in. I’ll be looking for the numbers among Cornyn primary voters, among other things, to get a sense of the direction we’re going. At some point we’ll see if all of the unhinged ranting about Talarico’s gender and sexuality and girlfriend and diet preferences take a toll or are seen as weird and a desperate attempt to avoid talking about issues, not to mention Paxton’s many sins. I’m sure we’ll have plenty more polls to talk about.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Fifth Circuit keeps on doing its thing

Item one: Texas’ app age verification law allowed to go into effect for now.

Texas’ law requiring app marketplace operators like Google and Apple to verify all users’ ages and seek parental permission before minors can download apps or make in-app purchases can go into effect for now, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked a temporary injunction issued by a federal district judge in Austin, who wrote in December that the restrictions in Texas’ law likely violated the First Amendment. The 5th Circuit panel did not explain its reasoning for issuing the decision, which can still be reversed by the appeals court in the future.

Senate Bill 2420, which was supposed to activate on Jan. 1, establishes age verification requirements and mandates parental consent before a person under the age of 18 is allowed to download or make purchases within apps. The law also requires app developers to say whether their apps are appropriate for people in four categories: children under 13, teens aged 13-15, older teens aged 16-17 or adults 18 or older.

Its supporters say the law is needed to protect children as they navigate social media and online spaces, while critics say it would violate free speech rights. Louisiana and Utah have passed similar laws that have not yet gone into effect.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association, a tech trade group, and Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, an advocacy group, filed separate lawsuits in October challenging the law, both arguing it violates the First Amendment.

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman sided with the plaintiffs in December, finding the law likely violates the First Amendment and issuing the temporary injunction blocking the law while the full case plays out in the district court.

“The Act is akin to a law that would require every bookstore to verify the age of every customer at the door and, for minors, require parental consent before the child or teen could enter and again when they try to purchase a book,” Pitman wrote in a 20-page ruling at the time.

See here for the previous update. This is an administrative stay, not a ruling on the merits, so things could get restored. It’s still the Fifth Circuit giving concierge service to Ken Paxton and that’s always annoying.

Item two: Federal court allows Texas immigration law to take effect, continuing legal seesaw:

A sweeping 2023 Texas immigration law that lets state authorities arrest and deport people suspected of having illegally crossed the U.S.-Mexico border can go into effect after a federal appeals court on Friday lifted a lower court’s stoppage of certain provisions.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an unpublished order after Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office appealed the lower court’s May 14 injunction, which had blocked most of the law a day before it was set to take effect.

Friday’s ruling, which clears the law to take effect in its entirety, is the latest in a dizzying series of seesaw rulings over the fate of the measure known as Senate Bill 4. It comes as part of a lawsuit filed by civil rights groups contending parts of the landmark immigration law are unconstitutional.

The organizations brought the current lawsuit earlier this month to stop four key sections of Senate Bill 4: the creation of a crime for re-entering the country without authorization, even if a person has since gained legal status; the establishment of magistrates’ authority to order a person’s deportation; the creation of a crime for not complying with a magistrate’s order; and the requirement that magistrates continue a prosecution even if a person has an asylum claim or other pending immigration cases.

In a joint statement, the groups called the court’s decision “disappointing and out of step with the Constitution and the unbroken practice of other courts.”

“S.B. 4 will devastate our communities and families by turning our state’s legal system into an unconstitutional weapon to surveil, harass, and harm Texans based on their perceived immigration status,” the statement read, coming from the ACLU, the ACLU’s Texas chapter and the Texas Civil Rights Project.

[…]

U.S. District Judge David Alan Ezra previously granted the preliminary injunction against these sections of the law. The Reagan appointee had signaled during a Wednesday hearing that he considered them unconstitutional.

“Indeed, it is implausible to imagine each of the fifty United States having their own state immigration policy superseding the powers inherent in the United States as a Nation,” Ezra reiterated in his written ruling.

At the time, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Texas and the Texas Civil Rights Project said his decision reaffirmed that immigration laws are not up to the states, while adding that SB 4 would cause widespread racial profiling.

“Texas cannot override the U.S. Constitution and should stop wasting time attempting to do so,” the groups said in a joint statement to The Texas Tribune.

This lawsuit came after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals tossed a previous legal challenge against SB 4, which was brought by immigrants and organizations that work with migrants. But instead of ruling on the constitutionality of the law, the appeals court dismissed that case last month after finding that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue.

See here and here for previous updates. This one is by far the worse of the two rulings, but perhaps the one more likely to be halted by SCOTUS before it gets out of hand. I know, that’s always a fraught thing to hope for. I say again, “court reform” that doesn’t include dealing with the lawlessness of this circuit is insufficient.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Endorsement watch: For Talarico, obviously

The Chron wastes no time in making their Senate preference known.

Rep. James Talarico

The contest is set. The storyline, straight out of Hollywood. It’s as if, as President Donald Trump likes to say, the candidates came from central casting.

An avowed lout versus a man who doesn’t just resemble a Sunday school teacher, but who practices politics like the seminarian he is.

Ask Ken Paxton’s own supporters about his infidelities and indictments. Ask about that stolen $1,000 pen. Or how he fired his employees after they reported him to the FBI for corruption, prompting a whistleblower lawsuit that stuck taxpayers with a $6.6 million bill. Oh, and ask about that impeachment that, though it did not end in conviction, was led by members of his own party.

Paxton voters know their guy reeks of moral rot. That he somehow earned millions while in public office. That his office delivered sweetheart deals in cases of child sexual abuse. His supporters know all that because his runoff opponent, Sen. John Cornyn, just spent tens of millions of dollars making sure that they know.

Paxton won anyway. As one man at a Paxton rally told a reporter, “We’ve got bigger fish to fry.”

The fish to be fried aren’t just Democrats but anyone who shows the slightest disloyalty to Trump. Or even a hint of bipartisan pragmatism.

This one’s an easy call. The Houston Chronicle editorial board rejects Paxton’s self-serving depravity and his loyalty to Washington politics at the expense of everyday Texans. And we enthusiastically endorse his Democratic opponent, James Talarico.

The rest of this goes into a lot of detail about Paxton’s corruption, sleaziness, and self-dealing. It’s a gift link, so read the rest and show it to the still-hopefully-redeemable MAGAnut in your life. Check in with the Cornyn supporters you know, see where they are. I like that the Chron got on this right away, because it was so obvious that there was no point in waiting but very much a reason to get this all on the record now. Let’s get on with it as well.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekend link dump for May 31

A Project 2029 should be mostly a blueprint for how to use trifecta power to the maximum extent possible by law and constitution to make thoroughgoing structural changes to the federal government to buttress against authoritarian fascist attack. Reinforcing the structures of civic democracy is a central part of that. To use a sports analogy, that doesn’t mean running good plays. It means reshaping the entire playing field. They’re not the same thing. That means starting as the sine qua non with things like ending the Senate filibuster and reforming the Supreme Court. But those are only the start. Those are the ones that make all the other reform and structural changes possible. They are also the talismans of seriousness. Because if you’re not willing to tackle those, you’re not any kind of player or even on the field.”

“I do think there’s potentially an interesting parallel in that Bohr and company were looking in the wrong place for a solution because of essentially aesthetic concerns (it would be much cooler if this required a radical revision of physics) in the same way that a bunch of mathematicians went down blind alleys on Erdős 1196 because they were drawn to shiny cool techniques. And then I wonder about the difference in approaches to the First Proof problem— does the “repulsive” but successful computer-generated proof suggest that the solution to this problem was delayed by the human need for elegance and narrative logic? Are we getting trapped and passing up potential proofs for essentially aesthetic reasons?”

“For the first time ever, solar is set to generate more electricity than coal in the power market managed by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.”

“Since the virus took off in mid-March, [Bangladesh] has tallied more than 60,000 suspected cases and 528 suspected measles-related deaths. The vast majority of the sick and dead are children under age 5.

Great story about the effort to identify unknown soldiers and the debate about how to use modern methods to maybe do it more quickly.

“Republicans Sound Like They’re Getting Nervous About Supreme Court Expansion”.

“I’ve seen people voice a lot of frustration with imperfect strategies and tactics that “won’t get us out of this.” I understand the desire for a simple, publicly stated, all-encompassing strategy that is so bold, and so complete in its aims, that we need only adhere to its outline. I desperately want someone to bust out a marker board and draw me a map, so I can organize my life and my community around that sure-footed path. But we are mid-tumble. The impacts are underway, and will continue to unfold. We don’t know what all those impacts will be.”

RIP, Dick Parry, saxophonist who played with Pink Floyd.

“The creator of the iconic soap opera “Dallas” knew next to nothing about the Texas city — and to anyone familiar with Dallas itself, it definitely showed.

“Three Judges Just Dared SCOTUS to Say What It Really Thinks About Black Voting Rights”.

RIP, Sonny Rollins, legendary jazz saxophonist, the Saxophone Colossus.

“But the tax rate of the middle-class barely changes. No matter how one looks at it, billionaires pay much less tax than the average American.”

“This scandal has layers, and each one is more rotten than the one beneath. The multiple legal violations have been well-catalogued. The fundamental illegal core is that the purported settlement was of a collusive lawsuit that couldn’t be brought in federal courts and couldn’t lawfully be the basis of an expenditure from the congressional Judgment Fund. But cataloguing the legal violations risks becoming a fog that obscures something simpler and more fundamental.”

“What litmus tests do is create clarity, truth in advertising. When you vote for candidate X, you know what you’re getting. They’ve given a clear promise that they support a particular thing and will do, if given the opportunity, a particular thing. If they don’t come through, they can be voted out of office.”

“No, Sharon: We Don’t Want a Digital Version of Ozzy Osbourne“.

“Inside the effort to save one of America’s most imperiled salamanders”.

RIP, Bob Horner, former third baseman for the Atlanta Braves, who once hit four home runs in a game.

“After months and months and months, the Trump Mobile T1 phone is finally out.”

“6-Year-Old Boy Finds 1,300-Year-Old Sword During School Trip”.

So-called artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean.”

This is the proper response to the Trump slush fund.

“I want to also acknowledge how the recent direction of [CBS News] stains the legacy of Mike Wallace, the namesake of this scholarship.”

RIP, Howard Storm, stand-up comic who became a TV director of such shows as Rhoda, Mork & Mindy, and Laverne & Shirley.

RIP, Claude Lemieux, longtime NHL player who won four Stanley Cups, with the New Jersey Devils, Colorado Avalanche, and Montreal Canadiens.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 3 Comments

Another case for Talarico’s chances

From Nate Cohn in the NYT:

Rep. James Talarico

After a decade of big talk from Democrats about Texas, it’s understandable that people could harbor some doubt about flipping the nation’s largest red state. Judging by presidential election results, Democrats barely made any progress at all: President Trump won Texas by almost 14 percentage points in 2024.

But beneath the state’s stable Republican voting record, extraordinary demographic shifts have put Texas Republicans in a much more vulnerable position. To an extent few would have imagined a decade ago, Texas’ status as a reliably Republican state now depends on elevated levels of support among Hispanic voters.

In the latest national polls, Mr. Trump’s gains among Hispanic voters have vanished — and the Republican grip on Texas is in danger as a result. The latest New York Times/Siena poll is representative: It shows Democrats ahead by 30 points, 54 percent to 24 percent, among Hispanic registered voters nationwide. That’s better than Joe Biden’s margin in 2020 and getting close to Hillary Clinton’s margin in 2016.

The signs of Democratic strength aren’t limited to the polls. Since 2024, Democrats have run well ahead of Kamala Harris’s showing in heavily Hispanic areas in special elections — including in Texas — and in the regularly scheduled elections in Virginia and New Jersey.

Alone, major Democratic gains among Hispanic voters would be enough to make Texas a plausible battleground in November. Now consider the party’s expected gains among other demographic groups — including white voters — in this national political environment, and suddenly the conditions would seem to be in place for a Democratic breakthrough.

To illustrate, consider this hypothetical: What would have happened in 2024 if Ms. Harris had fared as well as Mrs. Clinton did among Hispanic voters in 2016?

If she had, Texas would have been about tied. That’s right, tied. There are more sophisticated ways to reach this conclusion, but you can see for yourself just by plugging the results by race from the 2016 exit poll into the 2024 exit poll. You get a contest within one point.

How could this be? It’s been easy to overlook, but Democrats have made significant gains among Texas’ white voters during the Trump era. For comparison, the gains are basically equivalent to those Democrats made among white voters in Georgia, which drove that state toward the left over the same period.

The Democratic gains among white Texas voters would have been enough to make Texas competitive in 2024, if everything else had stayed constant.

[…]

While Texas Republicans have occasionally had a few close calls, this year’s contest is already different, at least by the measure of the polls. Back in 2018, Beto O’Rourke never led a poll collected by RealClearPolitics against Ted Cruz.

This time, Mr. Paxton hasn’t led a general election poll against Mr. Talarico since January.

Couple of things here. First, I did not realize that the 2024 election would have been that different had Kamala Harris achieved Hillary Clinton-levels of Latino support. That kind of blew my mind. Latinos, including those who voted for Trump in 2024, have massively soured on him, and the polls reflect that. I don’t expect to bounce back quite that far with them, but seeing that statistic did a lot to bolster the belief that big things are possible this year. And maybe not just for James Talarico. Remember how the big re-redistricting effort was built on 2024 election data, and the assumption that Latino voters were now really Republicans? Not looking so hot for them now, is it?

I see this analysis as a companion to both the Talarico almost-post-runoff poll and also the UnidoUS poll, which stressed the opportunities Democrats have now with Latino voters but which (for obvious reasons in the latter case) didn’t talk about other folks. I’ve said on many occasions that you can’t explain what happened in 2018 in Texas without understanding that a ton of former Mitt Romney voters had flipped to Democrats, which not only turned over two Congressional and multiple State House seats, but also almost put Beto O’Rourke in the Senate. We grew turnout by a lot in 2018 over previous non-Presidential years, but we also won a lot of experienced voters. I believe in the potential to do even more of that this year.

Finally, I’m glad to see Nate Cohn acknowledge another thing I’ve been saying lately, which is that Talarico has consistently led or been tied in the general election polls, which is something Beto did not do in 2018. Indeed, going by the numbers I still have on my sidebar, Beto trailed by an average of about 5.3 points over a fifteen-poll span from April to mid-September. (I stopped tracking them on the sidebar after that, I don’t remember exactly why.) I’d have to go and add it all up now, but that sounds like about the average margin that Gina Hinojosa is trailing Greg Abbott by in the current batch of polls. Beto outperformed those numbers then. Maybe Gina and others can do that now.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

How Fort Worth ISD parents are responding to the takeover

I wish them all the best. It’s going to be a long ride.

Zach Leonard, a parent to three Fort Worth Independent School District students, wants his children to be able to walk to a high-quality public school in their own neighborhood.

“That’s kind of an old school value, but I believe it to be an extremely important facet of our society,” he told Courier Texas.

But that value is under threat after the Texas Education Agency took control of Fort Worth ISD last October.

Under state law, TEA Commissioner Mike Morath was required to take action after one of Fort Worth’s campuses—Leadership Academy at Forest Oak Sixth Grade Center—received a failing accountability rating for five consecutive school years. In March, Morath replaced the previous superintendent, Karen Molinar, who served as Fort Worth ISD’s interim superintendent since October 2024 and worked for the district for over 30 years, with Peter Licata.

Morath also appointed nine new members of its appointed board of education, replacing the locally elected school board.

The new leadership has already drastically changed campuses across Fort Worth ISD.

“We want to restore local elected control, and I say elect—that’s important—because the control we have is local technically, but they’re not elected,” Leonard said. “These  nine people are business leaders primarily—lawyers, architects, and folks like that—business leaders in the community. And now they are doing the role of the trustees.”

Leonard founded the group FORT, or Families Organized and Responding to Takeover in 2025. The coalition of parents, educators, and concerned community members is working to improve student outcomes, build community, and restore local control amid the state takeover.

Leonard said teaching has become “rigid” under the takeover, and curriculum is scripted and derived from artificial intelligence. He also said there aren’t a lot of real books left on campuses.

“The rollout of new curriculum was really poor. They didn’t leverage curriculum writers, in fact, they let many of them go, and now use AI to create scripts for curriculum, and they had many mistakes. That disengaged a lot of teachers.”

The district has also faced cuts to several programs, departments, and staff positions, including directors of emergent bilingual programs, dual language coordinators, special education analysts, speech therapists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and psychologists.

Licata claims the district is starting fresh and will rehire for all the positions, but Leonard said it won’t be that easy.

“They got rid of all the part-time speech language pathologists,” he said. “Speech therapists and other special education teachers in things like dyslexia intervention are already stretched thin, they’re going from campus to campus. There’s rarely someone dedicated to a campus, and might have a sick day or they may have maternity leave, and so who fills in now that the part time employees are all gone?”

“They couldn’t even fill all the roles they had last year,” he added. “They’re not going to be able to quickly fill all these vacancies they’ve created.

Boy, do we feel your pain. I don’t have anything to add, so read the rest. And if you know someone in the Fort Worth area who’d like to get involved, have them check FORT out.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Good luck getting a Tesla ride

The wait times are terrible.

When Tesla announced an expansion of its robotaxis to Dallas and Houston last month, some investors touted momentum for CEO Elon Musk’s mission to transform the electric-vehicle maker into an AI-powered, driverless-tech giant.

Reuters reporters who recently tested Tesla’s robotaxis in those cities, however, found them to be still in a beta-testing ​phase. The service was plagued by long wait times and sometimes no availability at all. Drop-off spots on some rides were far away from the rider’s destination.

Tesla did not respond to requests for comment for this ‌story.

A reporter using the service in Dallas on a recent Monday afternoon spent nearly two hours to take what typically would be a 20-minute drive from the campus of Southern Methodist University to Dallas City Hall, about 5 miles (8.05 km) south on a major freeway.

At 4:55 p.m., the reporter requested a ride on the Tesla Robotaxi app, which works much like Uber, but was notified of “high service demand.” Around the same time, Uber showed an 8-minute wait for a 22-minute ride to city hall.

For the next half hour, the reporter tried booking a ride but continued to see either that high-demand ​message or one showing “no rides available nearby.” After 36 minutes of searching, a car showed up as available. The wait time was 19 minutes.

[…]

After the reporter ​trying to travel to Dallas City Hall finally got picked up, the car opted not to take North Central Expressway, the main artery to downtown, and instead took nearly 35 minutes to travel on surface streets. The car dropped him at a parking lot a 15-minute walk from City Hall.

After the rider pushed a button for “support” inside the car, an agent responded that the area was “restricted,” even though it was inside the Dallas service area map that Tesla posted on social media last month. “We’re still in the beta version,” the agent said.

The reporter booked rides to two other locations ​downtown. Each time, the app showed that the car would drop off the passenger in an area that would require a walk of about 15 minutes to reach the destination. On a ride to a downtown farmers’ market, the robotaxi dropped off the ​reporter on the opposite side of a freeway and suggested he walk under overpasses strewn with trash and smelling of urine.

On another ride, the robotaxi failed to make a left turn four times. The turn was in front of a freeway off-ramp with “do not enter” signs — an ‌unusual intersection that ⁠seemed to have confused the car. It instead continued straight and made right turns to double back around the block, but repeatedly missed the left turn.

The reporter described the situation to a remote attendant. Soon after, the car finally made the turn.

In Houston, Tesla is operating robotaxis in a small suburban area on the northwest side. Another Reuters reporter who recently tested the service on a weeknight was able to obtain one ride. When she tried a second time, the same car showed up as being 13 minutes away, but the app later canceled the ride.

She tried to find another car for the next 30 minutes but none were available. She ordered an Uber to her destination.

As a reminder, Tesla’s service only covers a tiny piece of Houston, up in the northwest part of Harris County, nowhere near most major destinations. The issue here, as is usually the case with Elon Musk, is overpromising and underdelivering. Remember when he said there’d be a million Tesla robotaxis on the streets by 2025? Yeah, we’re still waiting. Or at least Tesla investors still are, but they’re so far down the Muskian rabbit hole that it doesn’t matter. I personally think this is all a bunch of hype whose promises are mostly speculative, but what do I know. In the meantime, if you really want a ride in a Tesla robotaxi, better start booking it now. The Street has more.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

UnidosUS poll of Latino voters as we head to the midterms

Lots here to think about.

One in five Latino Texans who voted for President Donald Trump in 2024 would not support him again if given a redo, according to a new poll released Wednesday.

In a survey of 500 registered Latino voters, the Latino civil rights organization UnidosUS found that two-thirds disapprove of Trump’s job performance, the same share that said they did not feel Trump and congressional Republicans were “focusing enough on improving the economy for people like you.” Nearly half of voters cited cost of living and inflation as a top issue shaping their view of Trump — more than any other issue, with immigration enforcement in cities also ranking high in the list.

“The economic priorities dominate,” said Clarissa Martínez De Castro, vice president of the group’s Latino Vote Initiative. “Some people call it ‘buyer’s remorse,’ other people ‘do over.’”

The poll is the latest to cast doubt on the durability of Latino support for Trump and the Republican Party in a state he won by a wide margin two years ago, in large part due to Latino voters who swung to the right. Trump captured an estimated 55% of the voter bloc, which set a new high-water mark for Texas Republicans who had spent years losing Hispanic voters by double digits.

Democrats have found hope they might win a statewide election for the first time since 1994 thanks to other surveys that have also measured Latino voters’ eroding support for the GOP. Additionally, a Democratic union machinist rode a surge in Latino support to flip a Texas Senate seat in a January special election for a district that Trump carried by more than 17 points two years ago.

Pollsters conducted the UnidosUS survey between April 27 and May 14 over the phone, text invites and online panels in English and Spanish, depending on the participant’s preference. Roughly 40% of the state’s population is Hispanic.

Of the 500 voters surveyed, 300 live across five of the state’s top battleground congressional districts, each of which are Hispanic-majority seats: the 15th and 23rd Districts, which Democrats hope to flip from GOP control, and the Democratic-controlled 28th, 34th and 35th Districts, which Republicans are targeting after redrawing their boundaries to make it easier for a GOP candidate to win.

In those districts, a slight majority of respondents — 54% — said they planned to vote for the Democratic candidate for Congress; 27% said they’d support the Republican, while the rest were undecided, according to the poll.

U.S. Senate Democratic nominee James Talarico led his recently cemented GOP opponent, Attorney General Ken Paxton, by a more than 2-to-1 margin among Latino voters, as did Democratic gubernatorial nominee Gina Hinojosa over Gov. Greg Abbott.

Election after election, Texas Democrats won the Latino vote by wide margins. Former President Barack Obama and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton each won Latino voters by nearly 30 points in 2008 and 2016, respectively, according to exit polls. But the domination began to erode by 2020, when former President Joe Biden won the bloc by 17 points — foreshadowing Trump’s striking gains four years later.

Even in the years with stronger support from Latino Texans, Obama and Clinton lost the state overall by more than 800,000 votes.

The UnidosUS poll found Talarico and Hinojosa leading among Latino voters by the same margins as those former Democratic standard-bearers, with 21% to 25% of voters undecided.

That’s why, De Castro said, Democrats should not “rest on their laurels” just yet.

“The reality is that Democrats are still underperforming the levels of support that they would need from Latinos to be successful,” she said.

UnidosUS did a similar poll around this time last year, when the doubts and regrets were beginning to form. You can see the poll memo for this year here. They show Talarico and Hinojosa leading Paxton (51-24) and Abbott (53-26) by 27 points each, which as noted is in the range of what Dems at the top of the ticket used to win Latinos by. For sure, there are still a lot of “undecideds” in there, which as this poll notes includes a lot of younger voters. There’s a lot we can do to get them on board. I feel like Talarico is well-positioned to do that and will work at it. We should expect to see it in future numbers if he’s successful. The poll memo has a lot of interesting bits in it, so go check it all out.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How cities can help mitigate floods

Fascinating.

A new study on rain events in Texas could help reduce urban flood risks and improve planning for extreme weather.

The Texas A&M Urban Flood Study found that cities can actually change the weather, depending on the type of weather event.

Researchers looked at over 40,000 warm‑season individual storm events in Dallas-Ft. Worth, Austin, Houston and San Antonio between 1995 and 2017.

The study looked at individual storms instead of long-term rainfall totals and sorted storms into distinct categories, tracking their three‑dimensional structure using weather radar.

Researchers found that cityscapes and urban areas strengthen some storms while weakening others.

Dr. John Nielsen‑Gammon is a Texas A&M University atmospheric scientist and a co-author of the study. Nielsen-Gammon is also the Texas State Climatologist.

He said the most dangerous types of urban storms are ones that are similar to the June 2025 San Antonio flood which killed 13 people.

“That sort of rainfall runs off quickly and can potentially overwhelm sewer systems and urban creeks and streams and culverts.”

According to an overview of the study, the strongest and most consistent urban effect appeared in small‑scale thunderstorms, the kind that can pop up quickly on hot summer days.

Across all four cities, these local storms occurred 7% to 31% more often over urban areas than over nearby rural land. Radar data also showed that these storms tended to grow taller and more intense over cities, a sign of stronger upward motion in the atmosphere.

Cities can create what are referred to as “urban heat islands” which can cause storms to be more intense.

Nielsen-Gammon said many people incorrectly think that cities “repel” storms, or make storms go around them.

“People tend to perceive that cities inhibit rainfall, and actually that’s true of people just about everywhere. They often ask me why do storms seem to go around them rather than hitting them,” he said.

A copy of the study is here. I’ve not had a chance to look at it, but I hope the Mayors of those cities has someone reading it over carefully. We know about heat islands and how temperatures can vary greatly within a city, both of which will be getting worse in the absence of action. We also know that the costs of flooding affect us all one way or another. There’s no escaping the expanding flood map. Whatever cities can do to lessen those effects will have far-reaching consequences.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Austin ISD is on takeover watch

Ugh.

Austin ISD’s effort to stave off a possible state takeover suffered a major setback Thursday after the Texas Education Agency rejected the district’s plan to hand three struggling middle schools to an external nonprofit operator.

In a letter sent Thursday to Superintendent Matias Segura, TEA officials said Texas Council for International Studies failed to demonstrate a record of turning around campuses with repeated failing accountability ratings and, in some cases, partnerships with the nonprofit had produced worse academic outcomes.

District leaders applied for the partnership in March under the state’s SB 1882 program, which can shield campuses from certain state sanctions when districts turn over operations to outside organizations. But without the partnership protections, Dobie, Webb and Burnet middle schools remain on a collision course with state intervention if accountability scores do not improve this year. Under state law, Education Commissioner Mike Morath must either close campuses or replace the elected school board with an appointed board of managers when a campus receives five consecutive failing accountability ratings.

According to the letter, the district is still free to pursue the partnership, but would not receive a reprieve from accountability ratings that is offered under the SB 1882 program.

[…]

Public information records previously obtained by Austin Current showed Texas Council for International Studies was the only organization to submit a bid to operate the three schools. Board members approved the sole bidder just days before the March 31 deadline to submit an application for SB 1882 benefits in a high-stakes move to skirt state intervention. According to Thursday’s letter, district leaders submitted additional information to the state in May before the application was ultimately denied.

Texas Council for International Studies has led 16 SB 1882 partnerships since 2019 across San Antonio, Edgewood and Longview ISDs with mixed results. The nonprofit, which was founded as a partner organization focused on supporting students and schools implementing the International Baccalaureate programs in Texas, meets only two of three criteria for SB 1882 partnerships added by state education leaders as of March 2020, according to TEA’s letter.

While it has been in existence for at least three years and managed multiple campuses, Texas Council for International Studies does not have a track record of managing campuses to academic success or significantly improving academic performance, TEA’s letter said.

Only five of the 16 campuses led by Texas Council for International Studies under SB 1882 partnerships since 2019 faced “D” or “F” ratings at the time the partnerships were approved and three of those schools have either received worse ratings or failed to improve since, according to TEA.

That Austin ISD has been at risk of takeover is in itself not news, it’s been on the radar for at least the past school year. This failed attempt to avert the possibility of takeover via charter partnership was news to me, and it’s a bit of a puzzler. Like, why was this apparently questionable outfit the only bidder? Was Austin ISD’s money not green enough for Third Future Schools? Austin ISD parents and teachers ought to demand some answers about that. What happens next is up to how the students at those schools did on the STAAR tests, and what Mike Morath chooses to do if one or more of those schools failed to measure up. As I’ve had to say quite a bit these days, I wish Austin ISD well. I very much hope they don’t have to walk this path that we’ve been going down.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Talarico’s path to victory

Here’s the pitch.

Rep. James Talarico

In the end, James Talarico and Democrats got the matchup they had been salivating over for months.

Within two hours of Ken Paxton’s GOP primary win on Tuesday, Talarico had hauled in $600,000 — the strongest two hours of his entire campaign. Recent internal polling from a pro-Talarico PAC shows the Democrat has a 7-point lead against Paxton. Both figures were shared first with POLITICO.

In an interview, Talarico said he’s confident about his chances.

But Talarico faces a Texas-sized challenge to finally deliver on Democrats’ long-held fantasy of flipping the state, just two years after Trump won it by 14 points.

It’s an open question whether the state representative, who participated in Paxton’s impeachment trial, can successfully capitalize on the general-election candidacy of the scandal-plagued GOP nominee.

Talarico said Tuesday night that to win in November, he must convert supporters of Sen. John Cornyn — a conservative by almost any metric, except Trump’s. After Cornyn conceded, Talarico thanked the four-term incumbent for his service and told his supporters “you have a place in our campaign.”

It’s all part of his general election pitch, which Talarico outlined in the interview following Paxton’s primary win.

“I have a legislative record that I think has a lot to offer supporters of Senator Cornyn. Ken Paxton has a criminal record. I have a legislative record,” Talarico told POLITICO (Paxton struck a deal in 2024 where he paid restitution and securities fraud felony charges were dropped). He emphasized his history reaching across the aisle “to cut property taxes and raise teacher pay and lower the cost of housing and child care and prescription drugs,” and touted his willingness to break with Democrats on issues including energy and the border that are important in Texas.

“I’ve called out the extremes in both parties, on the right and left, and as you know, called out President Biden for failing to secure our southern border,” he said. “I’ve pushed back against national Democrats who want to hurt the Texas oil and gas industry and so I think that Texans are looking for a senator who is going to be independent, who’s not going to serve a political party, not going to serve any special interests or megadonors, but who’s going to serve people of Texas.”

Here’s the memo they provided to sum up their case. I’m more interested in the poll that accompanied the story, which contains the following numbers:

Senate race: Talarico 45, Paxton 38, Ted Brown 3, not sure 14

Governor’s race: Gina Hinojosa 44, Greg Abbott 48, not sure 8

Trump approval: 40-52

Abbott favorable: 41-52

Paxton favorable: 30-56

2024 recalled vote: Trump 56, Harris 42

The poll was conducted on Friday and Saturday, so just before the runoff concluded. That suggests that the same questions I’ve had about how voters who are still in the thick of that race might feel – and I wonder if Team Talarico also had a poll result against Cornyn lined up, along with a different memo and message statement, just in case. Be that as it may, there are a couple of caveats to mull.

Caveat #1: While the recalled 2024 vote numbers are dead on, the approval/favorability numbers are the worst I’ve seen anywhere for those three, at least from the Texas Politics Project. G. Elliott Morris has estimated Trump’s approval rating in Texas at around 40, but seeing Abbott and Paxton at those shockingly low numbers is a first. I’m not saying they’re wrong – Team Cornyn just spent several months and almost $100 million beating up Paxton on the airwaves, that has to take some kind of toll. I’m just saying that I’d like to see some further evidence of their low standing before I buy into it.

Caveat #2: Talarico does one point better than Gina Hinojosa, but Abbott does ten points better than Paxton. This doesn’t suggest crossover voters to me, as there’s basically no separation between Talarico and Hinojosa. The Abbott number suggests a lot of those “Ted Brown” and “Not sure” respondents to the Senate question are Abbott voters, and that brings us back once again to the question of how many of them are just slow to come around to voting for Paxton, and how many of them really won’t vote for him. If you know the answer to that, go buy yourself a lottery ticket.

I don’t want to dump the whole bucket of cold water on this, just enough to get your attention. The hesitation by some Republicans over Paxton is real, and it will have an effect. He won’t lag behind Abbott by ten points in November, but he could lag him by three or four. In a “Beto in 2018” environment – or better, which I think we will inhabit – that’s enough to win. A lot of words have been written about how Talarico has needed to court and win over Jasmine Crockett’s supporters. Well, Paxton will have to do the same to Cornyn’s supporters, and he was a hell of a lot uglier to Cornyn in their race.

Anyway. The one thing I am totally confident about is that we will see a lot more poll data going forward – TPOR has one coming out today, which I will write about for tomorrow – so as always, remember this is one data point. Remember also that there were almost no polls showing Beto ahead of Ted Cruz by any margin in 2018, so Talarico has that going for him, too. Now go do your part to help him and the rest of the ticket out.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Michelle Williams sues HISD for wrongful termination

Good.

Michelle Williams

teachers union leader filed a federal civil rights lawsuit Tuesday against Houston ISD’s state-appointed board and superintendent, as well as several district administrators and Lake Worth ISD’s new superintendent, after the district terminated her.

The Houston Education Association president, Michelle Williams, filed a civil rights action under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Texas Whistleblower Act after what the filing described as “institutional retaliation against a veteran educator and union president who reported violations of state and federal law to appropriate authorities beginning in August 2024”.

Williams is asking for reinstatement, back pay, and compensatory and punitive damages, among other requests.

The 26-year teaching veteran — who is running for the Texas Legislature — is also fighting for her job with the Texas Education Agency, where she’s petitioned the commissioner to reverse the board’s April decision to terminate her.

The board rejected an independent hearing examiner’s recommendation to reinstate Williams and instead adopted HISD’s proposal to reverse the hearing examiner’s findings, according to the petition to the commissioner.

It was the second time HISD sought to remove Williams. She was dismissed in March 2024 from her role as a third-grade math teacher, in part, over her social media activity. Williams was reinstated after a two-day virtual hearing.

See here for the background. Federal lawsuits take a long time to get through the system, and I don’t know how much faith I have in the TEA’s appeals process, so it may be awhile before there’s a resolution. That said, given that the independent examiner appointed by the TEA sided with her, maybe the TEA will listen to that. She deserved better from the appointed Board, that’s for sure. Oh, and the connection to Lake Worth ISD is that its newly-appointed Superintendent is a former Mike Miles lieutenant who testified against Williams during the Board’s hearing. Best of luck to you, Michelle Williams.

Posted in Legal matters, School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Another “below average” forecast

Good.

Forecasters at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are predicting a below-normal Atlantic hurricane season, officials said Thursday, citing the expected El Niño weather pattern which tends to suppress hurricane formation.

The agency forecasts eight to 14 named storms, with up to three potentially becoming Category 3 or higher hurricanes — which have wind speeds of at least 111 miles per hour.

Hurricane season starts June 1 and ends Nov. 30.

Last year was particularly quiet in the Gulf of Mexico — no named tropical storms or hurricanes made landfall in Texas. In 2024, Texas was struck by Tropical Storm Alberto and Hurricane Beryl — a Category 1 that left millions of Texans without electricity for days.

NOAA defines an average season as one with 14 named tropical storms and seven hurricanes, including three major hurricanes. The agency’s forecast predicts the formation of storms, not whether they will make landfall.

“Even though we’re expecting a below average season in the Atlantic, it’s very important to understand that it only takes one,” said NOAA Administrator Neil Jacobs. “We have had category fives make landfall in the past during below average seasons.”

The agency’s National Weather Service Director Ken Graham said one of the lessons from last year’s above-normal season was continuing their messaging on early preparedness.

“Don’t let words like below-average change the way you’re prepared,” Graham said.

The last time forecasters predicted a below-normal season was 2015, according to Matthew Rosencrans, NWS lead hurricane season forecaster. That year, no hurricanes made landfall and just two named tropical storms did, including Tropical Storm Bill that hit Texas in June.

NOAA has a 70% confidence level in these predictions and warns that the most active stretch will occur from mid‑August through late September.

See here for the Colorado State forecast, which was similar. Last year was definitely preferable to 2024, and the more that this year will be like last year, the better. But as Director Graham says, it just takes one. And storms have been intensifying more quickly these days. So be prepared.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Some early thoughts about the 2026 primary runoffs

A few of my thoughts and a few from other people…

– There were 114,059 votes cast in the Democratic runoff in Harris County, with 552,678 in the Lite Guv race. (There’s no way I can see to get the actual total number of ballots cast, so this is the best approximation I have.) Thus, 20.6% of Dem runoff votes were cast in Harris County. And as noted before, this was the second-highest turnout Democratic primary runoff of the century. I’m not going to do a full historical review of statewide runoff turnout, but there were 486,912 votes cast in 2022 (in the AG race) and 434,889 in 2018.

– There were 146,190 votes cast in the Republican runoff in Harris County, with 1,387,674 in the Senate race. Thus, 10.5% of GOP runoff votes were cast in Harris County. I don’t think that means anything, I just thought it was interesting.

– Once again we see how tricky it is to poll in these races. Annise Parker had an 18-point lead in the UH/Hobby poll, and lost by two. Christian Menefee has a seven-point lead in the UH/Hobby poll, and won by 39. Alex Mealer had a nine-point lead in that same poll and won by 36. It’s hard out here on a pollster.

– A couple of other Harris County results of interest that I didn’t mention yesterday: Judge Brian Warren held onto his bench with a 60-40 victory, while Melanie Miles ousted incumbent Justice of the Peace Sharon Burney. In re: Judge Warren, the HCDP sent out an email to precinct chairs last week confirming that we will be picking nominees for two judicial races, not just one, at the next CEC meeting. Judge Warren likely would have been an attractive candidate for one of those spots if he had fallen in the runoff, but that didn’t happen. I’m aware of three other potential candidates for the District Court bench at this time.

– Thoughts From Other People #1, from G. Elliott Morris:

Attorney General Ken Paxton defeated incumbent U.S. Senator John Cornyn in the Republican Senate runoff today, giving Democrats their preferred and weaker opponent. That’s not because Paxton is all that much more “conservative” than John Cornyn (whatever that means these days), but because he’s just generally a bad dude who has earned a lot of bad press over the last year. Paxton has what we call in political science a “negative candidate residual.”

The general impression that Paxton is a worse general election candidate than Cornyn would have been is not misguided. Empirically, hypothetical general election polling showed Talarico doing about 1-2 points better against Paxton than Cornyn across many polls. That is not an earth-shattering difference — but it might be enough in a close race.

And this race is looking really, really close.

[…]

Texas is not all crimson red all of the time. Back in 2018, Beto O’Rourke lost to Ted Cruz by 2.6 points. That was the closest a Democrat had come to a statewide Texas win in decades. Importantly for our benchmarking purposes, it happened in a year with a roughly D+7 to D+8 national environment. In other words: Democrats came within striking distance of Texas in a very good year for their party — about 9-10 points to the right of the national vote.

Now look at where things stand for 2026. The national generic ballot today is roughly D+6 to D+7 — not quite 2018, but close. In fact, Democrats seem to be running even with Democrats at this point in that last “wave” election — the generic ballot at this point in 2018, per my historical average, was also D+6. If Democrats gain another 1-2 points in the next 6 months (which is extremely doable in a midterm), that puts them in line with 2018 or better.

And there’s a real argument that the D+6 national number understates Democrats’ actual position in non-presidential electorates today. I’ve made this case in detail at this blog already: the people who turn out in midterms and specials have been disproportionately Democratic this cycle, and special election results have been running well to the left of 2024 presidential numbers. This alone means we should expect Democrats to do better in 2026 than in 2018, all else being equal.

Zoom in to Texas specifically, and the picture gets even more interesting. My state-level generic ballot estimates now have Democrats at 50.7% of the two-party vote for House candidates in the Lone Star state — essentially even with, or slightly ahead of, Republicans on the generic ballot in a state Trump won by 14 points just 18 months ago.

Morris applies all the usual caveats, but go read the rest anyway, because there’s a lot more to see.

– Thoughts From Other People #2, from Suzanne Bellsnyder:

A word to my fellow Republicans

I want to talk to the people reading this who feel the same knot in their stomach I do this morning.

You know who you are. You voted in the primary. Maybe you voted for Cornyn. Maybe you voted for Hunt. Maybe you held your nose and voted for Paxton because you’d been told he was the more “conservative” Republican. Either way, you are looking at this November ballot and something in you is recoiling.

And then a quieter voice in your head says: But I’m a Republican. I have to vote the ticket.

I want to take that voice seriously for a minute, because it isn’t a stupid voice. It’s the voice of every family Thanksgiving, every Sunday school class, every business relationship, every community board you’ve ever served on. It’s the voice that tells you who your people are. It is doing real work for you, and I’m not going to pretend otherwise.

But I want to ask you a harder question. What are you actually being loyal to?

You are not being loyal to the candidate. You don’t know him. He’s never visited your part of the world. You probably don’t like him. I might even argue he didn’t earn your vote and the votes he did manage to get were few and far between in the great scheme of things.

And frankly, the Republican party as you understood it — the party of Reagan, of limited government, of personal integrity, of character mattering — is not what’s on the ballot this November. The brand is the same. The candidates have changed.

I am asking you to think long and hard about this.

If your values are integrity, character, and showing up to do the job, then a vote for a candidate who fails those tests is a vote against your values, not for them.

So if you don’t align with these candidates on the values that matter most to you, what are you pledging your loyalty to?

Is it habit? The muscle memory of forty years of pulling the same lever?

Is it the discomfort of doing something different — the strangeness of standing in that booth and making a choice you’ve never made before?

Or is it the quiet fear that the alternative — voting independent, splitting your ticket, skipping a race — would feel worse than swallowing hard and pulling the lever one more time?

I am here to tell you it doesn’t.

Bellsnyder, who writes (and also podcasts) Texas Rural Reporter and is a big public school supporter and voucher opponent, has previously written about her disapproval of Greg Abbott and Dan Patrick as well; I daresay she’s not a Bo French fan, either. I’m putting this here mostly to show that there are Republicans who are not happy with at least some of their choices on the ballot this November. How many of them there are I couldn’t say, nor what they ultimately decide to do. But they’re there, and they’ll be a factor.

– Thoughts From Other People #3, from Tim Murphy at Mother Jones:

Cornyn’s trajectory is instructive, although there are vanishingly few pre-MAGA Republicans left to take note of it. He was a less partisan attorney general than Paxton, in his previous life in Austin. In his current one in Washington, Cornyn passed a modest, bipartisan gun control law after the massacre in Uvalde, and called Trump “reckless” after January 6th. A lot of people in the chamber seemed to respect him. There is not even a billow of smoke about a messy personal life. But there has also probably never been a point in the last two years of Trump’s rule where anyone has thought, Well, John Cornyn will put a stop to this. He, too, told a story about what MAGA does to Republican officeholders, about how people who might know better simply find a different version of themselves. When Democrats in the state escaped to Illinois last summer to deny quorum, it was Cornyn who suggested the FBI be used to track them down. This was the fallacy of his campaign—that in order to stop Paxton, he must essentially become him. But there was no substitute for the real thing.

As I explained in a profile of Paxton several years ago, the newly minted Republican nominee embodies something essential about the GOP in the age of Trump. He is remarkable not for his smarts or charisma, but for his willingness to do what is asked regardless of what might be proper. Shame can only hold you back. Under Paxton, the AG’s office has been a fully weaponized agency, that has launched frivolous but harassing investigations of voting rights groups and immigrant aid organizations; targeted Trump critics and Democrats; and built the legal foundation for overturning a presidential election. He has been elected over and over again by running against the enemies of Donald Trump and Christian nationalists—a Jewish Republican speaker; business-minded Republicans in the state legislature; a Bush scion; and now a white-haired elder statesmen who looked like someone who might broker a grand bargain even if he never really did.

It’s fitting that when Paxton was impeached in 2023, it was for allegedly using his office to benefit the interests of a single donor. While he was acquitted by the state senate and has denied wrongdoing, that kind of concierge service is the secret to his staying power. Increasingly, it’s just how you get ahead in Republican politics—not by blocking and tackling, or constituent services, or quietly building a reputation, but doing what is asked by the big guy.

Trump is who they want to be—saying and doing what he wants, making deals, getting rich. But Ken Paxton is all that most of them are: A bad lawyer looking to get ahead, background music in someone else’s story. After all, the Senate Republican caucus already includes two other former state attorneys general who signed the Texas AG’s shoddy brief seeking to throw out the results of the 2020 election. Graham and the rest will welcome him, even if it costs $100 million to get him there, because whoever was left of the old guard has retired or been forced out. There’s no more delusion about what a Republican senator is or needs to be in Trump’s second term: They’re all Ken Paxton now.

Murphy added this observation: “Of the state’s 254 counties, all but one went for the AG. The exception was tiny Kennedy County—Cornyn carried it 6 votes to 2.” The level to which Cornyn utterly debased and degraded himself in this campaign, all to get his ass absolutely demolished, is the sort of thing that deserves to have ba textbook be written about it.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Colony Ridge developers sue Alex Jones

Noted for the record.

The developers of a Houston-area residential community are suing far-right radio host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones for defamation, after comments he made in a February video in which he called the community a “mortgage scam” that was “occupied” by immigrants without legal status, according to a new lawsuit.

The community, called Colony Ridge, filed the lawsuit this week in Liberty County, accusing Jones and Pete Chambers, who also spoke in the video, of disparaging their business and defaming them.

The allegations stem from a Feb. 6 video shared on X, which was titled “TEXAS TREASON ALERT,” according to the lawsuit. The video was also shared on Infowars and Banned.Video, websites Jones operated until they were bought by The Onion and shut down earlier this month, as well as on TikTok.

In the video, Chambers stated Colony Ridge was known as “la Colonia” and that it was “occupied” by thousands of immigrants without legal status, according to the lawsuit. Jones and Chambers also allegedly called the development “a mortgage scam.”

“Colony Ridge is about the people. We take seriously our responsibility to stand up for our residents and our community,” Colony Ridge CEO John Harris said in a statement provided to Houston Public Media. “When powerful media figures knowingly spread lies about a community, there must be accountability. We will not sit by while Alex Jones, Pete Chambers, and Infowars use our residents as props in a disinformation campaign. The record must be corrected, and those responsible must answer for the real harm they have caused.”

See here for past Colony Ridge blogging. Pete Chambers was a candidate in the GOP primary for Governor, and finished in second place with 11% of the vote. I don’t have anything to add here, I just approve of there being more lawsuits against Alex Jones. May he never go another day without having to deal with litigation against him. The Chron and the NYT has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Going old school

Fascinating.

After years of classrooms adopting more tech, a small but growing number of Houston-area private and charter schools are dialing back screens.

The pandemic saw many students move to online instruction, and afterward schools began to quickly adopt technology, allowing students to use Chromebooks for worksheets, homework and tests. In the 2021 school year, 96% of public schools reported providing digital devices to students who needed them.

Now, some schools are encouraging paper-and-pen learning and limiting devices to help students learn better and develop social skills amid national and statewide concerns about screen time.

“The way that we’ve looked at technology is tied right into that we want these girls to have the greatest degree of freedom possible,” said Margaret Cronin, director of admissions and communications at the Magnolia School. “We feel like that in these early years, educating them without that distraction, in a lot of ways really will lead to that greater degree of freedom.”

Some public school districts have also scaled back screen time for students. At Los Angeles Unified School District, board members voted in April to limit screen time and transition away from one-to-one device policies. In Richardson ISD near Dallas, district leaders are introducing new rules that put a cap on how long students can use devices in class.

[…]

Many educators and parents pushing for less screen time say the shift is backed by a growing body of research on how students learn.

Meredith Austin, associate director at Rice University’s Center for Education, said studies have shown that heavy screen use in classrooms is linked to weaker academic outcomes.

2023 study analyzing National Assessment of Educational Progress data found that the more time students spent on digital devices in English class, the lower their reading comprehension scores.

Still, Austin said other factors have contributed to student learning declines over the past few years as well, including social media, reading instruction, COVID shutdowns and teacher shortages. It’s unclear to what extent screens have affected recent learning outcomes, especially because some research shows technology paired with good teaching instruction can benefit students.

Jill Filipovic has been on this bandwagon, and there’s certainly a lot of research at this time to back up that position. I agree with Prof. Austin that it’s not completely “tech” versus “not tech” – kids do need to learn about this stuff, after all – but I’m all in favor of taking several steps back, thoroughly reviewing the research, and cordially inviting a whole bunch of school tech vendors to go jump in the lake. Meanwhile, here in HISD, Mike Miles is converting a bunch of schools into AI-focused “Future 2” schools. If I still had kids in HISD, I would move heaven and earth to ensure they were not enrolled in any of those schools. I will very much take the bet that after a few years, when there’s been some quality research done on the usage of AI in school curricula, any successes there will be the exception. Until then, he’s giving parents here another reason to go elsewhere.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Primary runoff results: Statewide

This was a total anti-climax.

Still a crook any way you look

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton defeated veteran U.S. Sen. John Cornyn in the GOP runoff Tuesday, toppling the four-term incumbent in a fierce duel that centered on who was more loyal to President Donald Trump.

Early results show Paxton led Cornyn in almost every major county in a race that saw high participation, with early voting returns more than tripling the early ballots cast in 2024. The Associated Press called the contest at 8 p.m.

Paxton will now face off against Democratic state Rep. James Talarico in the November election, setting up what is expected to be one of the most competitive general elections in Texas since the 1990s.

The outcome also marks what could be the end of a long political career for the 74-year-old Cornyn, who was seeking his fifth term in the U.S. Senate.

Speaking in Austin on Tuesday night, Cornyn said while his campaign “came up short,” he would support Paxton in the general election in November.

“I’ve said throughout this race I trust the voters of Texas,” he said. “They’ve made their decision and I must respect it.”

Well, the voters sure as heck didn’t respect you, John. You didn’t seem to exhibit much in the way of self-respect in running this campaign, either. Paxton was winning 63-37 early on, so it’s hard to say that the Trump endorsement made any difference. The whole thing was humiliating from the get go. If he ran a campaign that reflected who he’s always been over the past thirty or so years, I’d feel some sympathy for John Cornyn, who certainly did a lot of things while in public office. But he didn’t, he debased himself constantly trying to get Trump’s endorsement, and in the end this is what he got. He earned it. The Trib, the NYT, and TPM have more.

Elsewhere on the Republican side, Mayes Middleton was leading to be the next fascist Attorney General, while the even more fascist Bo French had an early but perhaps not insurmountable lead for Railroad Commissioner. Even GregAbbott thinks he’s terrible, but only because he’s worried French might lose. Don’t worry, the billionaires will tell Abbott what he really thinks.

On the Democratic side, Vikki Goodwin cruised to victory in the Lite Guv runoff, while Nathan Johnson was leading for AG. You better be ready to spend some money to beat Mayes Middleton, Nathan.

Oh, and while Ken Paxton will soon be out of state government, his stench will linger.

UPDATE: Speaking of stenches:

Bo French declared victory over Railroad Commissioner Jim Wright in the primary runoff Tuesday night, in a campaign where French prioritized issues like fighting DEI and Sharia Law over traditional regulatory issues.

French is poised to face Democrat state Rep. Jon Rosenthal in the November general election. A Democrat has not held a seat on the railroad commission in decades.

[…]

A former Tarrant County GOP chairman, French espouses some of the most extreme views among Texas Republican officials, even as the party has pivoted further to the right in recent years. Earlier this year, French called on his party to more openly embrace Islamophobia and said the U.S. should deport 100 million people, nearly a third of the country’s population and a number that suggests he wants to deport U.S. citizens.

He has drawn the ire of members of his own party for his unapologetically offensive posts on social media often using slurs to refer to people with mental disabilities and LGBTQ+ people. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick called on him to resign from his county chairmanship after French posted a social media poll asking whether Jews or Muslims were a bigger threat to America.

Patrick, Gov. Greg Abbott and House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, all endorsed his opponent.

We all know how much that will mean now.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Primary runoff results: Statewide

Primary runoff results: Congress

Rep. Christian Menefee won big.

Rep. Christian Menefee

U.S. Rep. Christian Menefee defeated longtime U.S. Rep. Al Green in Houston’s closely watched Democratic runoff for Texas’ newly redrawn Congressional District 18, positioning Menefee to hold the heavily Democratic seat in November.

The race capped more than a year of political upheaval surrounding the district following the deaths of longtime U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee and former Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner, who succeeded Jackson Lee in Congress but died just two months into his term. Some Houston-area voters were forced to cast ballots in the race four times in less than a year.

Menefee already represents the district, having won a January 2026 special election under the previous boundaries to complete Turner’s unfinished term. He will now advance to the November general election as the favorite to secure a full two-year term beginning in January 2027.

Tuesday’s matchup was created after Texas Republican lawmakers approved new congressional maps that merged much of Green’s longtime 9th Congressional District into the reconfigured 18th District, setting up an unusual race between two incumbent Democrats.

Throughout the campaign, both candidates repeatedly emphasized that the matchup was fabricated by Texas Republicans and President Donald Trump.

“I didn’t ask for these new maps, Congressman Green didn’t ask for this, and the voters of this district certainly didn’t ask for this,” Menefee recently told the Houston Chronicle. “But we are not going to let Donald Trump and (Gov.) Greg Abbott use this gerrymandering scheme as a distraction from the real issues.”

That was the first called race, basically right after early voting was reported. Rep. Menefee not only had a big lead in Harris County, he also led big in Fort Bend County, where Rep. Green had performed strongly in March. Of course, Fort Bend had some problems during the day.

Some Fort Bend County voters experienced significant delays at polling locations Tuesday afternoon after a clerical error caused check-in systems to malfunction across the county.

Check-In System Goes Down Across Fort Bend County Polling Locations
Fort Bend County Election Administrator Chase Wilson said the problem was traced to an incorrect file being uploaded to the poll book system. A voter file from the May 2 city and school election was mistakenly loaded into the primary runoff database, rendering check-in tablets non-functional at polling locations countywide.

Provisional Ballots Offered as County Works to Restore System
Wilson said the issue was discovered around 2:30 p.m. and the county immediately contacted its vendor, which provided a fix. Voters who were unable to check in during the outage were offered provisional ballots, and paper combination forms were provided on the advice of the Texas Secretary of State’s office. Wilson said the glitch did not affect the integrity of the election or the accuracy of ballot totals — only the check-in process.

All Polling Locations Back Online Before Press Conference
Wilson said all affected polling locations were back online before a press conference held Tuesday afternoon.
“One hundred percent of all issues have been resolved at the polling locations,” Wilson said.

Judge Wong Says He Would Have Extended Hours — But the Decision Wasn’t His
Fort Bend County Judge Daniel Wong said he would have acted if he could, but the authority to request extended hours during a primary rests with the party chairs, not the judge.

“If this were a November election, I would request an extended voting time,” Wong said. “During a primary election, the two party chairs have the authority to ask for an extension of voting time. I do not have that authority.”

The Fort Bend GOP Chair wanted hours extended, the Democratic chair, for reasons unknown to me, did not. I don’t know what’s up with that. Rep. Menefee sent out a statement while this was happening requesting that Fort Bend extend their hours. I dunno, man. Houston Public Media and the Press have more.

Elsewhere, Colin Allred had about a ten point lead over Rep. Julie Johnson for the redrawn CD33. Johnny Garcia had a decent lead in CD35, with 60% of the early vote in Bexar County. It appears he has been declared the winner, so that’s a relief. On the Republican side, Alex Mealer won the twerp-off in CD09, while some dude named Jon Bonck won in CD38.

UPDATE: In the end, Johnny Garcia got over 63% of the vote, so good job everyone. He’ll face Carlos de la Cruz in November, another beneficiary of a late Trump endorsement. To add insult to injury, John Lujan, for whom his buddies in the Lege drew this seat, saw his anointed successor in HD118 also lose in the primary. Hilarious. Colin Allred defeated Julie Johnson 54-46 in CD33.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Primary runoff results: Congress