Whitmire waffles on ICE ordinance

Pathetic. And predictable.

Mayor John Whitmire

Mayor John Whitmire last week joined his City Council colleagues in voting to limit Houston police officers’ interactions with federal immigration agents, but now says the city must “correct” its policy after Gov. Greg Abbott threatened to pull $110 million in public safety grants.

“We’ve got to correct that policy,” Whitmire said after a Tuesday press conference about the FIFA World Cup. “And it does not matter what a council member’s legal opinion is. There’s only one opinion that matters, and that’s the governor’s … We can’t survive in a city that does not have public safety funding to the tune of losing 110. Public safety is my highest priority.”

Abbott’s public safety director told Whitmire in a Monday letter that Houston was out of compliance with its agreement for state grant funds and must revoke the policy by April 20 or repay the funds — though Whitmire said “they closed our accounts” Monday afternoon. Whitmire said cash for World Cup security, cadet classes, equipment and police vehicles was at risk.

The mayor has called a special Houston City Council meeting Friday to vote on whether to repeal the policy, which was approved by a 12-5 vote last week. The measure eliminated the city’s prior requirement that officers wait 30 minutes for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to pick up someone with a civil immigration warrant.

“We had a reasonable immigration ICE policy that was working well but three council members that are running for office decided to make this a higher-profile issue,” Whitmire said at the Tuesday press conference.

The proposal was brought forward by Council Members Alejandra Salinas, Abbie Kamin and Edward Pollard under Proposition A, which allows any three council members to add an item to a council agenda as long as it is legal. Typically only the mayor has that power.

Whitmire for months fought attempts to limit HPD’s ICE cooperation, repeatedly saying the city was following state and federal laws. He then voted in favor of the proposal last week, saying he felt it codified existing policy and that “it makes a statement that we listen.”

The mayor backed the proposal after the city’s legal department, which reports to him, struck a section that would have given officers discretion on whether to call ICE.

See here for the previous update, and here for the Chron story on Abbott’s threat. Just a reminder, the City Attorney reviewed and approved the ordinance that was passed, assuring that it was in compliance with state law. Mayor Whitmire voted for it, based I’m sure in part on that assurance. But now that Abbott is throwing a toddler tantrum, he wants to blame the three Council members who put the ordinance forward. That’s the sort of thing they just don’t teach in leadership classes, I’ll tell you.

Here’s a brief quote from the Chron op-ed on this debacle:

Houston isn’t a sanctuary city. It never has been. This new policy doesn’t change that. In fact, it doesn’t even go as far as policies recently adopted by Dallas or Austin. The Harris County Jail has been and still is a hub of ICE activity. Immigrants arrested for serious crimes are routinely handed over to the feds. We’re nothing like Minneapolis or Los Angeles. Heck, more people are arrested on immigration-related charges in the Houston area than in any other region in the country and that’s still not enough for Abbott?

It’s pretty clear who’s concerned with public safety here and it isn’t a governor who threatens to withhold funding for it. His office sent a letter saying it would withhold unspecified public safety dollars, which presumably could include the police. Going after Houston is just part of the partisan playbook in Austin. Whitmire promised when he ran for office that his longstanding ties to Austin and respect among Republicans as a smart-on-crime Democrat would spare us from such political games. Apparently not.

Yes, please tell me again how having his phone number in Abbott’s Hotmail contacts has been beneficial to the rest of us, because I sure as hell can’t see it. Grow a pair and tell Abbott we’ll see him in court. And that if he thinks he can do so great a job as Houston’s Mayor, get his ass on down to City Hall, log off of Twitter, and give it a try. The reason why Abbott attacked Houston while leaving Dallas and Austin alone is because he expected Whitmire to roll over and show his belly. Give him a reason to think differently next time and maybe he’ll think twice about it. The Trib has more.

UPDATE: CM Salinas has sent a letter to Mayor Whitmire urging him to have the city file for a temporary restraining order against the retraction of the funds, which she says could be heard today. I’ll post a link to the letter later today.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fifth Circuit upholds ruling overturning federal home distilling ban

Good for the home distillers.

A U.S. appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for ​Congress to exercise its power to tax.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of ‌Appeals in New Orleans ruled in favor of the nonprofit Hobby Distillers Association and four of its 1,300 members.

They argued that people should be free to distill spirits at home, whether as ​a hobby or for personal consumption including, in one instance, to create ​an apple-pie-vodka recipe.

The ban was part of a law passed during ⁠Reconstruction in July 1868, in part to thwart liquor tax evasion, and subjected violators ​to up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Writing for a three-judge panel, ​Circuit Judge Edith Hollan Jones said the ban actually reduced tax revenue by preventing distilling in the first place, unlike laws that regulated the manufacture and labeling of distilled spirits on which ​the government could collect taxes.

She also said that under the government’s logic, Congress could ​criminalize virtually any in-home activity that might escape notice from tax collectors, including remote work and ‌home-based ⁠businesses.

“Without any limiting principle, the government’s theory would violate this court’s obligation to read the Constitution carefully to avoid creating a general federal authority akin to the police power,” Jones wrote.

See here and here for the background, and this Courthouse News story for coverage of the hearing. As I said before, I’m in favor of this ruling in principle, though I have some concerns about its legal underpinnings. I kind of get the impression that this is more limited in scope than I had first feared, so if that’s true then I’m more unabashedly happy about the result. Let the people distill. The Chron has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AI and prediction markets need to be kept out of elections

Ain’t gonna happen this year, though.

Artificial intelligence and prediction markets have opened new frontiers in Texas politics, but one expert said the growth of platforms like ChatGPT and Polymarket is far outpacing legislative efforts to limit their impact on elections.

It’s a trend that’s emerging in Texas’ Republican primary for U.S. Senate, as Sen. John Cornyn and Attorney General Ken Paxton trade AI-generated attack ads, including a recent video published by Paxton that featured a smiling Cornyn enjoying “spring break” while President Donald Trump’s agenda stalled in the Senate.

The race has also seen significant interest from traders on prediction markets, which allow users to bet on the outcome of everything from elections to wars and sports. More than $15 million in trades have been placed on the outcome of the primary through Polymarket, according to the website’s market page for the Senate primary.

Texas was the first state to pass a law limiting the use of deepfakes in political advertising, but experts said the technology has evolved well beyond the scope of the 2019 bill, which applies only to state races. Further state and federal efforts to regulate the impact prediction markets and other AI tools can have on elections have largely floundered, leaving the door open for political actors to use the technologies in everything from the 2024 presidential primary to a 2025 election for Dallas City Council.

Andrew Cates, a campaign ethics attorney who’s written nine editions of a legal practice guide on the subject, said, without guardrails, both technologies can have dire consequences for elections in Texas.

“We’re cooked for sure,” Cates said. “Nobody knows anything about AI (at the Capitol). Nobody knows anything about computers. And that’s beyond the fact that the absolute truism is that government will never keep up with technology. It moves way too fast.”

The information ecosystem of elections — already burdened by disinformation on social media — could collapse as candidates adopt increasingly advanced tools that make it near-impossible for voters to distinguish fact from fiction, Cates said.

Voices can be spoofed, videos and images fabricated. Trend lines on prediction markets can be driven up or down by deep-pocketed candidates and donors, potentially impacting voters’ perceptions of candidates’ popular support, Cates said.

“You can just have somebody be a straw man and dump money into a Polymarket race and influence everybody else,” Cates said. “Anyone can drop a bunch of money and then go: ‘Oh, s—, somebody just put $1 million on Donald Trump.’ And then all of a sudden, it swings it up to a 70-30 race.”

Cates said Texas law currently does not prevent candidates from using their campaign donations to bet on themselves using prediction markets like Polymarket, which did not respond to questions about the company’s policies regarding elections.

[…]

Cates worked with Rep. Dade Phelan to introduce a bill building on the 2019 deepfake law, hoping to force candidates and PACs to disclose if AI was used in political advertising. The bill passed the House but died in the Senate.

Phelan, who previously served as speaker of the Texas House, announced in August he would not seek reelection. The Beaumont Republican’s decision came amid rising ire from GOP voters who have criticized him for his role overseeing Paxton’s 2023 impeachment proceedings and attacks on his record as a conservative lawmaker.

Phelan said political social media influencers were among the most vocal critics of the bill, saying it was an attack on political speech and their ability to “meme” freely.

But Phelan said the bill aimed only to regulate memes that were generated by people being paid to do so. Regulating political speech funded through campaign contributions is a common practice, he said, pointing to disclosure requirements for political advertisements.

“There was a segment of paid online influencers who probably would have had to disclose their AI use under this bill, and they’re the ones who try to say it had to do with memes,” Phelan said.

[…]

Phelan said he’s also concerned about prediction markets and the impact they may have on Texas elections. But without action from the federal government, he said he doesn’t expect to see legislation addressing AI or prediction markets out of Austin.

“It’s going to take, unfortunately, a very bad incident where someone loses an election over a fake ad before we see anything real happen here,” Phelan said. “It’s sad, because the voters at the end of the day are the ones that are going to lose out the most.”

Well, Grampa Greg Abbott keeps falling for AI-generated fake videos, so the fear is real. That said, I don’t think we’re cooked, not yet anyway. I do agree with Dade Phelan that it’s going to take a very bad incident for anything to happen. I think it’s also going to require a non-corrupt Supreme Court, which may have a more nuanced view of free speech – I don’t think it’s ridiculous to say that chatbots and LLMs and the like don’t have First Amendment protection, at least not as broadly as the rest of us do – and a willingness to allow normal regulation of paid advertising. Maybe some states can take the lead in the meantime, assuming Trump and the Republicans don’t manage to pass some kind of bill forbidding state action. One way or the other, something will happen. It will be a matter of cleaning it all up afterwards.

Posted in Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reps. Gonzales and Swalwell to resign from Congress

That escalated quickly.

Rep. Tony Gonzales

U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales announced on Monday he would resign from Congress, avoiding an expected vote on his expulsion after he admitted to having an affair with a staffer.

Gonzales, a Republican from San Antonio, has faced intensifying scrutiny in recent months after the San Antonio Express-News first revealed evidence that he engaged in a sexual relationship with a married staffer who later died by suicide, prompting calls from colleagues for him to step aside or be ousted. Pressure further mounted when another aide came forward, saying the married father of six pressed her for nude photos and sex during his first run for Congress in 2020.

“There is a season for everything and God has a plan for us all,” Gonzales said in a statement posted on X. “When Congress returns tomorrow, I will file my retirement from office. It has been my privilege to serve the great people of Texas.”

The third-term lawmaker said he would step aside minutes after U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., who is facing numerous allegations of assault from staffers, announced he would relinquish his seat in the House. Both men were set to face expulsion votes this week over alleged sexual misconduct.

Earlier in the day there was a story about how there was a bipartisan push to expel each of the two sex pests (okay, alleged sex pests), and the next thing you knew they were both announcing their intention to resign, with Swalwell an hour or so ahead of Gonzales. I’ve put what was going to be the original post beneath the fold in case you’re curious. This would trigger a special election to fill Rep. Gonzales’ term in CD23, and normally I would assume Greg Abbott would declare it an emergency and schedule it as quickly as possible. But given the way special elections have been going lately, and how much attention this would draw, I’m thinking he’ll wait until November, which would be the default option, and not risk a huge, more-consequential-than-SD09 embarrassment. (Section 203.004 applies here.) I can’t wait to see what he decides. The Trib and the Associated Press have more.

UPDATE: Katy Padilla Stout, the Democratic candidate in CD23, has put out a statement that includes a call for Greg Abbott to schedule the special election as soon as possible.

Continue reading

Posted in Scandalized!, Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Court blocks changes to Historically Underutilized Business Program

Good.

A Travis County district court judge granted a request for a temporary injunction to block the latest rule changes to the state’s Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) program. The injunction reverts HUB program back to its original regulations, but the judge said her ruling only affects the six businesses that filed suit against the state.

The Honorable Amy Clark Meachum said she ruled in favor of the temporary injunction because no court in the state had voided the HUB program in its more than three decade existence, and added that no executive agency had the authority to interpret the laws passed by the legislative branch of government.

The decision comes after a group of female-owned and minority-owned businesses sued the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, and acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock, after the agency drastically overhauled the program late last year.

“This is a victory for the rule of law. This is a victory for the separation of powers. And this is a victory for every single small business owner in Texas who has had the courage to stand up and fight,” Alphonso David, the co-counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a news conference following the ruling.

The plaintiffs in the case argue that the Comptroller overstepped its executive authority in changing state statute and financially harmed more than 15,000 small businesses. The Texas Attorney General’s office is defending the Comptroller’s actions because they argue the HUB program violated both state and federal constitutions.

[…]

Some of the business owners named in the lawsuit testified in court Monday to talk about the impacts of the rule changes. Ruben Mercado Jr. owns and operates a civil construction company in Houston called Ipsum General Contractors LLC. He testified that 85% of his business comes from HUB-related contracts.

Mercado, who is a veteran but not disabled, said he had to layoff 15 of his 20 employees following the changes to the HUB program. Mercado said he lost a $2 million dollar contract following the changes, although he testified he was never told why he lost the contract.

Representatives from two organizations that help minority-owned businesses also took the stand in court Monday to talk about the impact they were seeing. Margo Posey, the president of the Dallas-Fort Worth Business Council, said the changes were devastating to her small business members who had to layoff employees and were at risk of losing property.

State attorneys tried to point out during cross-examination of witnesses that no existing contracts were proven to be cancelled because of the Comptroller’s actions, and said any projections of a loss in revenue were merely presumptions.

Both sides of the issue were in agreement that the HUB program did not guarantee a company to win a publicly-funded contract. That is because state agencies are required by law to get the best value for taxpayer-funded projects. But the argument that seemed to sway judge Meachum the most was the issue of separation of powers.

State Sen. Royce West, who helped craft the bill in the 90s, also testified in court today that when the legislatures crafted the bill, they had no intention of allowing the Comptroller to change it.

“It’s law in the state of Texas,” West said in a news conference. “Today, the court upheld that law.”

Monday’s order restores the HUB program rules to what they were before Hancock’s emergency order, but only for the six plaintiffs in the case. David, the counsel for the plaintiffs, said principle of the ruling on Monday was that all executive branch officers can not rewrite laws crafted by the legislature.

David also added that he interprets the judge’s ruling to allow other companies to reapply for the HUB program since regulations are being returned back to normal.

“That means practically is that anyone who was a part of the program could effectively reapply,” David said. “They’re not prohibited from doing that and if the controller precludes them from reapplying, they create additional constitutional problems.”

See here and here for the background. According to a statement I got that was sent on behalf of the plaintiffs, the ruling included the line “It is well settled law that the executive branch enforces the law but cannot alter pre-existing law”, which is as clear as I thought it would be. The statement, which I have included beneath the fold, also says that the state is expected to appeal, and the full hearing on the merits is set for November 9. I approve of the ruling, I hope it stands up under appeal, and kudos to all who filed and argued it.

Continue reading

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Astrodome to be considered for National Historic Landmark status

Wow.

Ready and waiting

It’s hard to believe that the Astrodome, which became the world’s first domed sports stadium when it opened on April 9, 1965, doesn’t already have National Historic Landmark status. Often nicknamed the ‘Eighth Wonder of the World,’ the Astrodome is now one step closer to earning the distinction.

The National Park Service recently shared that the Astrodome meets the criteria for consideration as a National Historic Landmark.

“It’s the highest honor that a historic site can receive,” explains Beth Wiedower Jackson, executive director of the Astrodome Conservancy.

To qualify, a property must meet one of six criteria:

  • Be the location of an event that had a significant impact on American history overall.
  • Be the property most strongly associated with a nationally significant figure in American history.
  • Provide an outstanding illustration of a broad theme or trend in American history overall.
  • Be an outstanding example of an architectural style or significant development in engineering.
  • Be part of a group of resources that together form a historic district.
  • Be a property that can provide nationally significant archeological information.

There are approximately 2,700 National Historic Landmarks. The Astrodome would be in good company.

“That level of designation really elevates the building across the country, internationally, and at home as well,” Jackson says. “If we’re rising to the level of the Statue of Liberty or the Golden Gate Bridge, then the Astrodome is not just sitting there. It has value to the nation. So if there’s a way to save it, we should. This is important.”

[…]

While meeting the criteria for becoming a National Historic Landmark is the first step in a multi-year process, Jackson notes the milestone’s significance. Preservation Houston prepared the evaluation in partnership with the Astrodome Conservancy.

“Because the building has already been designated a State Antiquities Landmark, which has teeth, a National Historic Landmark will not add any protections,” Jackson says. “What this honorific designation does in the mindset of the public is affirm the rarity and the value of the Astrodome.”

The next move is to prepare the formal nomination. The Conservancy is raising funds to hire a professional consultant to prepare a compelling case.

Ultimately, the U.S. Secretary of the Interior would need to issue the final approval.

See here for the most recent update on the Dome, in which we were informed about the cost of demolition ($55 million) and renovation ($752 million). More on the Astrodome Conservancy’s proposals can be found here and here. There has never been a shortage of ideas for What To Do About The Astrodome, the issue has always been how to pay for it. If the Dome is fully considered for National Historic Landmark, it might be 2028 or 2029 before it happens. If I were the Conservancy I’d probably want to wait until after the next Presidential election, but your mileage may vary. I gotta try to do an interview with these folks, I have so many questions I’d like to ask them. Anyway, this has been your latest Astrodome update.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Interview with Rep. Vikki Goodwin

Rep. Vikki Goodwin

I’m going to shift my interview focus to the Democratic primary runoff, which will be the next election for most of us. There are a few races of interest, I’m going to try to do what I can with them. The main race of interest statewide is for Lieutenant Governor, where four-term State Rep. Vikki Goodwin led the field. Rep. Goodwin, who represents HD47 in Travis County, was one of a dozen Dems who flipped Republican seats in 2018. A graduate of the LBJ School of Public Affairs, she runs a residential real estate business with her husband, and has served on the Appropriations Article III Subcommittee overseeing education funding in the Lege. Here’s what we talked about:

Courtesy of Greg Wythe, you can find a transcript for this interview here. I spoke to her runoff opponent Marcos Vélez back in February, and you can listen to that interview here. I also spoke to Ron Angeletti, the candidate in the SD04 special election here. I will have more interviews with runoff candidates soon.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

House Dems fined for most recent quorum break

Not the end of the story.

A committee of the Texas House of Representatives voted late Friday afternoon to impose financial penalties totaling nearly $422,000 on Democratic House members who broke quorum last August to try to prevent the Republican-led Legislature from passing a controversial mid-decade congressional redistricting plan.

The GOP-led Committee on House Administration imposed $303,000 in fines on the 50-plus Democratic members for being absent without leave during the first and second special sessions of the 89th Legislature. The committee assessed an additional $118,889.81 penalty to reimburse the Texas Department of Public Safety for expenses incurred in trying to compel those members to return to the chamber.

Under House rules, the members being penalized may not use political fundraising in order to pay the fines or reimbursement expenses — in this case more than $8,000 per member.

The committee voted 6-5 along party lines, under a motion by state Rep. Charlie Geren, R-Fort Worth, the committee chair, after taking testimony in executive session for more than six hours. Geren made no statement other than to read out the terms of the motion.

Several Democrats on the committee gave closing statements before the final vote. State Rep. Joe Moody, D-El Paso, pointed to Republican rhetoric against Democrats during the quorum break — including threats by Gov. Greg Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to force the expulsion from office of Democrats who had fled the state.

“Americans just like us from both sides of the aisle have been murdered over politics in the past year,” Moody said. “We can’t play any part in bringing that to Texas. If we do, one day, we’ll be sitting in a room like this, talking about the death of someone we worked with, someone we looked in the eye and broke bread with, and yes, sometimes disagreed with. When that happens, no amount of political points will have been worth it.”

[…]

In a statement, state Rep. Gene Wu, D-Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said the caucus was looking at options to respond.

“The House can enforce its rules, and members can use constitutional tools when our constituents’ representation is under attack,” Wu said. “But if leadership is going to impose thousands of dollars in personal penalties, it has to provide timely notice, transparent records and a meaningful chance to respond. That did not happen today.”

See here for the previous update. The first question I have is what about the members who won’t be returning to the House? Is Charlie Geren going to sic a collections agency on, say, James Talarico or Chris Turner? I think they’d be on pretty firm ground telling them to pound sand. What steps will the Republicans take to enforce the collection notice on the members who do return? Well, if Dan Patrick’s nightmare comes true, then the new House majority ought to be able to pass a rule to obviate the penalties. If not, then I would assume there would be legal action taken by the House Dem caucus over any attempted penalties or other consequences for non-payment by individual members. The state constitution expressly allows for quorum breaking, after all. They may not prevail in court, but it would slow things down. Long story short, I have no idea. Imposing the fines and collecting on them are two different things. We’re a long way from the latter happening.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sorry, but data centers don’t need those tax breaks

Let them pay their taxes.

Texas will lose out on at least $3.1 billion in sales tax revenue over the next two years thanks to an exemption for the state’s booming data center industry, according to the comptroller’s office.

That figure is likely a vast underestimate given the explosion of new facilities being built, but already makes the tax break one of the state’s costliest incentive programs and soon to be the most expensive of its kind in the nation.

Lawmakers, who will meet in January for the next legislative session, say they are considering proposals to either limit the scope of the tax break or get rid of it altogether.

“These new numbers are extremely concerning and I will say they’re unsustainable” said state Sen. Joan Huffman, chair of the Senate Committee on Finance in an interview with The Texas Tribune. “I plan to look at filing legislation to either repeal the exemption or take a very close look at it and see.”

Lawmakers approved the tax break more than a decade ago, when data centers were smaller and required fewer resources. From 2014 to 2022, the exemption amounted to between $5 million and $30 million in lost state revenue per year. By 2023, that skyrocketed to more than $150 million, and this year Texas is forgoing at least $1.3 billion — a number that is rapidly increasing every year, based on state projections.

The money Texas is poised to lose from the tax break on a yearly basis could pay for the entirety of the state’s new school voucher program, or it could double the size of a state disaster fund to help local communities like Kerr County prevent flooding. It’s also quickly outpacing the cost of Texas’ highly controversial Chapter 313 tax abatement program, which allowed manufacturing companies to avoid paying local school property taxes, drawing the ire of lawmakers who eventually shut down the program last year at its height of more than a billion dollars a year.

[…]

Data center industry leaders warn that shrinking or ending the tax break could spell an end to Texas’ rising status as the nation’s No. 1 destination for data centers, a status the industry argues comes with new jobs and billions of dollars in local investment.

“I think the hostile message that sends would … give a lot of different companies pause about what the state of being able to invest in Texas for the long term is,” said Dan Diorio, vice president of state policy with the Data Center Coalition, a trade group that represents major tech companies.

Meanwhile, data centers are becoming increasingly unpopular among locals.

Cities like San MarcosAmarilloCollege StationWaco and Harlingen have seen grassroots movements pressuring local officials to block data center projects. A recent Quinnipiac poll found 65% of Americans oppose the construction of a data center in their community.

Texas is one of 37 states offering tax exemptions for data centers, most of which are sales tax exemptions tied to local economic growth requirements. States like Virginia, Illinois, Michigan, Arizona and Georgia also are debating whether to curtail or significantly alter those tax breaks.

The tech industry argues that tax breaks are crucial to maintain the industry’s investment in the state, which creates jobs and generates local tax revenue. Critics say the industry is choosing Texas for its abundance of cheap land and electricity as much as any tax break.

Dick Lavine, a former fiscal analyst for left-leaning policy group Every Texan, said there are many reasons why a company decides to build in a particular area, “and taxes is far from the most important.”

“Somebody’s giving out money; [the companies] want to be in line. But it’s not really how decisions are made, especially when there’s bedrock things like land and energy that are much more important than their tax rate,” Lavine added.

Yeah, cry me a river, Dan. Giving out these tax breaks is a choice, and considering how few jobs the data centers themselves create, it’s a damn expensive one. It’s also the case that those tax breaks are ultimately going to companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta, all of which can cover their loss.

And while localities can try to stop these things or at least slow them down, since it’s not such a great deal for them and their residents hate them, they may not be able to do so at some point.

Last month, county commissioners in Fayette County, a deeply Republican area between Houston and Austin, approved a resolution opposing the development of data centers after word spread that tech companies were targeting the area.

The push from cities and counties across Texas to slow the flood of data center development comes as Texas Republican leaders are heralding their arrival as another economic boom, putting pressure on Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to weigh in ahead of his runoff next month with U.S. Sen. John Cornyn.

As the state’s top lawyer, Paxton has been asked to weigh in on whether municipalities have the power to hold up data projects, pitting the Republican between top tech companies and their GOP supporters, including Gov. Greg Abbott and President Donald Trump, and the rural Texans who have long supported him.

In conservative Hood County in North Texas, close to Paxton’s home base, a flood of applications for the construction of data centers has drawn opposition among residents who worry the facilities, which require large volumes of water and electricity and often stretch across thousands of acres, will deplete the region’s water supplies and drive up power prices.

“The concern most people have is this new type of development is going faster than the speed of information coming to the public,” said state Rep. David Cook, a Mansfield Republican. “People are looking for assurances that our water and power supplies are not going to be wiped out here.”

Hood County commissioners narrowly voted down a moratorium on data center construction in February but have, alongside other counties, sought Paxton’s opinion on whether they can take such action. That followed a request from state Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Houston Republican, for Paxton to uphold state law he says denies municipalities the ability to block data centers.

[…]

At the same time tech executives including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, Palantir’s Joe Lonsdale and OpenAI’s Greg Brockman are pumping millions of dollars into political races across Texas and the nation.

The super PAC Leading the Future, which says it has $100 million in commitments since launching last year, spent more than $750,000 helping billionaire Elon Musk’s attorney, Chris Gobert, win the GOP nomination to replace retiring U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul. And they spent another $500,000 supporting former Justice Department official Jessica Steinmann, who won the GOP primary for retiring U.S. Rep. Marcus Luttrell.

Meta’s Forge the Future super Pac, which is backed by a $50 million investment from the tech giant, reported spending more than $1.3 million on Texas races, including Acting Texas Comptroller Kelly Hancock’s unsuccessful bid to win a full term.

And they have found support among politicians like Bettencourt, who led the passage last year of a bill blocking cities from enacting moratoriums on data centers and other large industrial projects.

In an interview, Bettencourt said keeping Texas open to businesses that might prove unpopular with some residents, including multi-family housing and battery factories, was vital to the state’s economic future.

“There is a segment of people that are basically saying they don’t want any more growth,” he said. “What might be very desirable in one county could be perverted into a horrible weapon like we’ve seen other states do, pick California or Illinois or New York.”

So on the one hand you’ve got some crabby voters, and on the other hand you have many millions of dollars in PAC money. Who do you think will win that fight? As the story notes, Paxton can wait on issuing an opinion until after the primary runoff, or after November, whichever he thinks is more politically expedient. I’m not betting against the PACs, are you?

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekend link dump for April 12

“This is when the difference between “conspiracy” and “conspiracy theory” becomes crucial to understand.”

“It was in 2012 that Dawber realised that solving vehicle crimes was his true calling. As a Cheshire police officer specialising in vehicle theft, he was tasked with looking into a notorious Manchester gang linked to more than 70 thefts of farm machinery. The cases had all been investigated in isolation, so Dawber did his own cold-case review, poring over the evidence for each, revealing their MO – the areas they most frequently hit, the times they did so. A sting was set up. A police digger with a tracker was planted in a suitably vulnerable spot. Dawber likes to tell the story that, at the sentencing, the ringleader, resigned to his fate, paid his respects to the cops who had caught him. “You’ve done a good job with this one,” he said.”

“Hegseth is elevating this very virile masculinity as the prime factor for military success, and stem[ming] from [that is] the fact that he has conveniently scapegoated women and minorities as the reasons why America lost the forever wars. Post-9/11, women and people of color really were elevated in significant ways for the first time in the military and they, by all accounts, excelled. Hegseth, whose own masculinity and identity is tied to his military service, found it easy to point to them as the reasons for failure, rather than to interrogate his own behavior, his own training, and the military’s broader tactical missteps.”

“I’m going to try to spin this in a more positive direction, and make an affirmative statement about what I think should be central to education when it comes to science.”

“Researchers have said online opt-in surveys are becoming increasingly infested with bogus data as respondents who are often paid for their participation use AI to fill in questionnaires at speed.”

Is the snooze button bad for you or not?

“Meet the woman who wants Democrats to get hot, not bothered”.

“Among the fossils found inside the cave were the remains of saber-tooth cats, giant sloths, and armadillo ancestors the size of lions – animals that roamed Central Texas during the last interglacial, a warm period that occurred around 100,000 years ago during the last Ice Age.”

“On Good Uses for Your Time and Money in These Times”.

“But it’s not even really about the money, it’s about HOW this happened. These actors were in the middle of renegotiating deals to reflect the success of the television show, success due in no small part to the effort and talent of the cast. [The Summer I Turned Pretty] is a hit not just because it’s a good show people enjoy, but because people fell in love with what Lola Tung, Christopher Briney, and Gavin Casalegno, specifically, brought to their roles. And yet, when it came time for them to reap the benefit of their work, they were (allegedly) forced into an unfavorable deal. They were essentially told to shut up and sign or lose everything. If that happened in any other context, we’d be steaming mad, it’s not okay just because it happened to actors and we, as a society, don’t value performance as a job. That’s on us, not them.”

Who’s your daddy? Um, we don’t know, actually.

I have a lot of respect for what Aaron Rupar does. I sure couldn’t do it myself.

“‘The Boys’ & ‘Daredevil’ Didn’t Want To Mimic Reality, It Just Happened”.

“And so we have allowed those who are personally vicious and who are deliberately cruel to obtain unchecked power and to wield our power on our behalf. And they are threatening to create Hell on earth. We have so much to unlearn and so little time to unlearn it.”

All of these people are terrible and we should root for them to keep om fighting.

“The American buffalo—those ornery, hairy prairie beasts that reign as the official mammal of the United States—have joined wind turbines, electric cars and climate researchers in the cross hairs of the Trump administration.”

“But the truth is, it’s clear enough to most people what Silicon Valley’s project boils down to, in practice, when its executive class talks about AI. It is to move as much chatbot product, slop, and job automation as it can. It’s entirely possible—as well as moral and popular—to refuse this project.”

“Utah unveils the ‘Zammoth,’ a Mammoth-themed Zamboni based on 2002 Olympic ice resurfacer”. Just seeing the picture is worth the click.

“If you hate your wife, it’s a lot easier to justify exploiting her unpaid labor for your own personal gain.”

RIP, Davey Lopes, four-time All Star second baseman, mostly for the Dodgers.

“Every way to look at this, whichever documents decisions are being based on, the U.S. is trying to get out of the war more than Iran is. That’s notwithstanding the fact that Iran has suffered almost incalculably more damage. But this comes back to a point we discussed at the outset of the conflict. It’s never about the absolute amount of damage. It’s about the stakes for each side. For Iran, it’s the survival of their government and an entire theological-political worldview. Donald Trump is trying to avoid losing control of both houses of Congress. Those aren’t comparable things.”

From the rats fleeing a sinking ship department.

Survivors have done their part. Now it’s time for those in power to do theirs.”

RIP, Afrika Bambaataa, hip-hop pioneer.

“What followed was a comedy of errors including military drills that outpaced anything this group of office workers had in mind, a rogue porcupine, stranded airplanes and one syringe to the butt of an employee.”

Cool pictures from space. ‘Nuff said.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 2 Comments

Smokable hemp ban paused

For now.

A Travis County district judge has temporarily lifted a statewide ban on the sale of natural smokeable hemp products, such as flower buds and rolled joints, until at least April 23.

Judge Maya Guerra Gamble granted the Texas Hemp Business Council, Hemp Industry & Farmers of America, and several Texas-based dispensaries and manufacturers a temporary restraining order against new testing requirements that creates 0.3% total THC threshold, effectively eliminating smokeable products. Lawyers for the hemp industry argued that the agencies have overstepped their constitutional authority by rewriting the statutory definitions of hemp established by lawmakers in 2019.

The concept of the new total THC testing came from the federal government, which clarified the definition of hemp in November as containing a total THC concentration of less than 0.3% on a dry weight basis rather than only delta-9 THC, according to Zachary Berg, an attorney with the Texas Attorney General’s Office who represented Texas Department of State Health Services and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission on Friday. Berg added that the federal government’s new definition doesn’t go into effect until November, but the state wanted to be in compliance early with federal law.

Jason Snell, one of the attorneys for the hemp businesses, said that by trying to mirror a federal law that isn’t yet in effect, the state clearly overstepped its regulatory authority. He also submitted to the court over 300 pages of testimony from Texans about how these new rules and regulations are already shuttering businesses and killing off the industry.

“The wave is getting bigger,” Snell said. “We are asking you to put up a barrier.”

The hemp businesses also asked for a temporary injunction on other rules that increase licensing fees for retailers and manufacturers and prevent businesses from selling smokeable hemp out-of-state. Guerra Gamble also temporarily unblocked interstate sales, but she deferred the topic of licensing fees to the next hearing on April 23.

See here for the previous update. Not much to say about this now, it would have been more of a surprise had the plaintiffs failed to get a TRO. We’ll see about the rest of it on the 23rd, after which I expect the state to appeal unless they fully prevail. The Chron has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Feds aim to screw Colony Ridge residents in their settlement

Totally on brand.

In December 2023, the U.S. Justice Department sued a Texas land developer it accused of duping tens of thousands of Hispanic residents into predatory mortgages, a landmark case for the Biden administration.

Colony Ridge, which sold plots in massive subdivisions north of Houston, had become a “one-stop shop for discriminatory lending,” Kristen Clarke, assistant attorney general for civil rights, said at a news conference announcing the lawsuit. The developer targeted Hispanic applicants through false advertising and persuaded them to take out high-interest loans that many could not afford, then benefited when it foreclosed on their properties, the lawsuit alleged.

“Our goal at the end of the day is to ensure that victims are compensated for their loss,” Clarke declared.

Three years later, the Trump administration and Colony Ridge are on the verge of resolving the case. But the $68 million proposed settlement provides no money for victims of the alleged scheme. Instead, it sets aside $20 million for policing and immigration enforcement — a provision that may be used to target the very people who were victimized by the developer, according to former government officials who worked on such cases.

“I’ve never seen a settlement like this, with a complete misalignment between what you’re settling and what the resolution is,” said Elena Babinecz, who led fair lending investigations at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for 12 years under the Obama, Trump and Biden administrations, before leaving in October.

“It’s a slap in the face to the individuals that were harmed; that the Justice Department acknowledges were harmed,” said Babinecz, who was at the bureau when it joined the Justice Department in filing suit against Colony Ridge. “It’s a complete misjustice, and it’s not at all why these civil rights laws were passed.”

Seven other attorneys and investigators who formerly enforced the federal government’s lending and housing civil rights laws also told ProPublica and The Texas Tribune that they were stunned by the agreement, which a U.S. district judge must still approve. Indeed, Colony Ridge is the largest Justice Department case since at least 2018 in which the settlement includes no monetary compensation for victims. The judge has scheduled a hearing on Friday over the proposal.

A coalition of fair housing and civil rights groups has urged the court to reject the settlement, arguing the lawsuit is the only realistic prospect for many consumers to get recompense because they cannot afford private attorneys.

See here for the previous update. The judge in this case is Al Bennett, so that at least is good news for the residents who were victimized. I expect him to give this a thorough review. As the story notes, this is wholly consistent with the decimation of consumer protections under the Trump administration. The only way this could have been more on brand is if there had been a contribution to a fund controlled by Trump, or a big purchase of some shitty Trump-branded product, as part of the settlement. I wouldn’t rule it out as an auxiliary and ancillary agreement.

UPDATE: Man this really sucks.

The Justice Department said Friday that it would move forward on a proposed $68 million settlement with a Texas land developer it had accused of preying on Hispanic residents, despite a judge’s concerns that the agreement did not do enough to help victims.

During a hearing, U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett questioned why the settlement had no compensation for those who were harmed and grilled a federal prosecutor over $20 million devoted to police and immigration enforcement. He said he was uncomfortable with the provision because the Justice Department’s lawsuit against Colony Ridge, which has massive subdivisions north of Houston, mentioned nothing about public safety or immigration.

“I thought I was dealing with … folks who had been defrauded, with allegations of above-market interest rates, improper foreclosures,” Bennett said, holding up the original lawsuit in his right hand and the settlement in his left. “Now, all of the sudden, I’m being asked to OK increased law enforcement?”

“Who in the settlement room said it would be a good idea to give $20 million to law enforcement?” Bennett asked early in the hearing. “Where did that come from?”

[…]

Of the 183 housing and civil enforcement settlements the Justice Department has announced since 2018, only 6% lacked money for victims, and none included funding for police or immigration enforcement, an analysis by the news organizations found.

Including such a provision in a predatory lending case has never been done before, said Bennett, who sought to find a compromise.

An hour into the hearing, Bennett asked the Justice Department and the attorneys for Colony Ridge, which has denied any wrongdoing, whether they would consider his suggestions to revise the settlement to obtain his approval.

Colony Ridge attorney Jason Ray said his client would consider it. [Senior prosecutor Varda] Hussain said the Justice Department wasn’t interested.

Instead, the Justice Department said it would pursue the settlement without seeking judicial approval under a provision of federal law that allows it to do so. That means the court will not supervise Colony Ridge to ensure the developer follows the terms of the settlement, said Johnathan Smith, former deputy assistant attorney general for civil rights during the Biden administration.

Smith, who helped assemble the Colony Ridge lawsuit three years ago, said now the case simply goes away because there is no one to enforce it. He added that the Justice Department cannot sue Colony Ridge based on the same claims in the future.

“By having settlements that are public and that are court-enforced, it sends a clear message to other potential bad actors that there could be real consequences for their actions,” Smith said in an email.

He said the Justice Department’s decision amounts to a “get out of jail free card.”

The “DOJ is turning its back on the victims, and those victims are left with no recourse and no assurance that any actions will be taken to remedy the harms that were identified in DOJ’s original complaint,” Smith said.

“Appalling” seems like to small a word. Whatever is left of the Trump Justice Department at this point needs to be burned to the ground and then rebuilt from scratch.

Posted in La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

DPS and Rangers investigating Camp Mystic

Okay.

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said Tuesday that the Texas Rangers have launched a criminal investigation into Camp Mystic, where 25 campers and two counselors were killed during a catastrophic flash flood on July 4.

And the Texas Department of State Health Services, which also is investigating the Hill Country camp, has received more than 600 complaints and requests to not renew Camp Mystic’s state license this year, Patrick said in a letter to the agency.

“You should not renew or approve a camp license for Camp Mystic, or any other camp the same operators intend to run, until your investigation, and all criminal and legislative investigations are complete and necessary corrective actions are taken,” he wrote.

“With many questions remaining unanswered surrounding the deaths of 27 young girls, parents and Texans deserve to have all issues resolved prior to Camp Mystic and/or their operators being allowed to welcome children back into their care this summer,” he added.

Camp Mystic submitted a license renewal application to DSHS on March 30 seeking approval to reopen its Cypress Lake camp this summer, a portion of the retreat that did not flood on July 4. The camp’s current license expired March 31.

[…]

The DSHS said it will investigate potential violations of laws and rules governing youth camps. The Texas Rangers, an arm of Texas Department of Public Safety, said it’s assisting DSHS “regarding complaints of neglect by Camp Mystic.”

Patrick said in his letter to DSHS that the Texas Rangers are conducting a criminal investigation, though the DSHS’s investigation is administrative. Patrick didn’t elaborate.

Camp Mystic’s officials said in a statement Tuesday that they have “cooperated with every investigative request we have received.”

“We have worked closely with the Texas Rangers since the tragic events of July 4, assisting them in their search and recovery efforts, which are ongoing,” they said. “We look forward to cooperating with the Texas Rangers and supporting them in their efforts to gain a thorough and accurate understanding of what happened on the south fork of the Guadalupe River during the early hours of July 4.”

The Texas Senate has established a general investigating committee on the deadly July 2025 floods that will meet jointly with a corresponding committee in the Texas House of Representatives to examine the facts surrounding “the extreme loss” of 27 children’s lives at Camp Mystic, Patrick said in his letter.

That committee is working to finish its investigation in the coming weeks, with a hearing and report expected by early summer.

See here for some background. I assume Camp Mystic expected some extremely close scrutiny when it applied for another license this summer. They may not get to open regardless of what happens with that, as one of the many lawsuits filed against it seeks to prevent its opening until all the litigation is resolved. Those plaintiffs got an order preventing any alterations to the camp grounds at this time; the camp has appealed that ruling. I don’t know what value DPS and the Rangers are bringing here, but I suppose if Dan Patrick wants them involved, they’ll be involved. Spectrum News has more.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A brief history of May regular elections in Harris County

As we know, there is a special election on May 2 in SD04, which happens to be the uniform election date in May for 2026. We are not accustomed to voting in May in Harris County, especially not in even-numbered years. I’m not talking about primary runoffs, which do generally occur in May, but the May version of the November uniform election date. (The exceptions for May primary runoffs are 2020 due to COVID, and 2012 due to redistricting litigation, which as we all know had the butterfly effect of helping Ted Cruz get elected to the Senate.)

May elections in general are for cities, ISDs, and community college districts. Some larger cities have migrated to November elections, as they have higher turnout. Austin did this a few years ago, and San Antonio is set to follow in 2029, in response to a bill passed last year that made it easier for municipalities to make that move. A number of smaller cities in Harris County, as well as several school and community college districts, still have their elections in May.

What makes it all a bit confusing is that you can’t easily tell from the election results archives on Harris Votes what all of these elections should be. I assume part of it is because it’s possible for these entities to run the elections themselves, which they can do instead of having the Harris County Clerk do it. I’ve been frustrated trying to find election results for place like Pasadena and Katy in the past because they have done them by themselves. It’s just that there’s an inconsistency in the data that makes it hard for me to say with confidence what exactly is going on.

It’s best just to show you what I mean. I went through the last ten years of election archives, out of sheer curiosity that began with the question of whether there would be anything else on the May 2 ballot this year and got a bit out of hand, as these things can do. Here are the elections I saw that happened in May of recent years. You tell me what it all means.

2025

Friendswood
Jersey Village
Nassau Bay
Pasadena
South Houston
West University Place

Lee College
San Jacinto CC

Clear Creek ISD
Humble ISD
Pasadena ISD
Tomball ISD
Waller ISD

2024

SD15 special election
HCAD

2023

Friendswood
Humble
Jersey Village
Nassau Bay
Pasadena
South Houston
West University Place

San Jacinto CC

Clear Creek ISD
Goose Creek ISD
Humble ISD
Pasadena ISD

2022

State props 1 and 2
HD147 special election

Friendswood
Humble
Jersey Village
La Porte
Nassau Bay
Pearland
Webster

HCC 2 special election

Huffman ISD
Humble ISD
Klein ISD
Pasadena ISD
Sheldon ISD
Waller ISD

2021

Humble
Missouri City
Nassau Bay
Pasadena
South Houston
Southside Place
Webster
West University Place

San Jacinto CC

Clear Creek ISD
Goose Creek ISD
Humble ISD
Pasadena ISD

2020

Nothing.

2019

Humble
Pasadena
South Houston
West University Place

Goose Creek ISD
Humble ISD
Pasadena ISD

2018

Houston City Council District K special election

2017

Humble
Pasadena

HISD recapture election version 2
Humble ISD

2016

HD139 special election

2015

Humble

Humble ISD
Klein ISD bond election

2014

SD04 special election (yes, another one for SD04)

2013

Lone Star College

Humble ISD
Tomball ISD

Then nothing for a few years except the Houston City Council special election in District H in 2009, and a slate of elections in Baytown and Pasadena plus the Houston City Council special election for At Large #3 in 2007. You can scroll back further if you want to.

Were it not for whatever was going on in 2022, I’d say that the pattern was every-two-year elections for a number of smaller cities and ISDs/CCDs, with them sometimes running them on their own and sometimes employing Harris County. There may also be some years in which all of their elections were uncontested, in which case state law allows you to skip the voting process since there’s nothing at stake. I didn’t look that closely. I have no idea why there were all these elections in May of 2022. If you live in one of these places and know what the deal was, please leave a comment and let us know.

The bottom line is this: We do not generally vote on the uniform election date in May in even numbered years. Most of us hardly ever vote in May on the uniform election date – looking back on this, I’ve voted in May in 2024, 2022, 2017, 2009, and 2007. This year there will be three elections in May – SD04 on the uniform date, City Council District C runoff probably on the 16th, and primary runoffs – but no one is eligible to vote in more than two and most of us will still just have the normal primary runoffs. It’s a little weird but it’s not that far outside the normal rhythm. We will get through this. And listen to my interview with SD04 special election candidate Ron Angeletti if you haven’t yet.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

KP George removed from office

A rough year gets worse.

Fort Bend County Judge KP George was suspended from office Friday following his felony money laundering conviction, a rare move that removes the county’s top elected official from power and puts county government under temporary leadership.

During a brief hearing in Fort Bend County’s 400th District Court, visiting Judge Jeth Jones of Galveston ordered George suspended and appointed Daniel Wong, the Republican nominee for county judge, as temporary replacement while the civil removal case remains pending.

George, who was convicted March 20 on felony charges tied to his handling of campaign finances during his 2018 campaign, was not present for the proceeding.

Wong will take office once George posts a required $50,000 bond, a standard condition under Texas law for elected officials and temporary appointees, before they assume office, Assistant District Attorney Wes Wittig said Friday.

The suspension stems from a civil removal petition filed by Fort Bend County resident Sarah Roberts under Chapter 87 of the Texas Local Government Code, which allows residents to seek removal of county officers for official misconduct or incompetency. Roberts asked the court to suspend George immediately and appoint a replacement pending trial, arguing that his criminal conviction and broader alleged misconduct made him unfit to remain in office.

Wittig said the removal case was already underway before the money laundering trial concluded and was not triggered by the March verdict.

“This didn’t happen because of the trial and the outcome,” Wittig said. “It was already underway.”

According to Wittig, Roberts’ original lawsuit was rooted in allegations tied to George’s conduct during Commissioners Court, including claims that he cut off a speaker during public comment and told another resident she did not have First Amendment rights in the courtroom. Those incidents are cited in Roberts’ petition as evidence supporting her request for removal.

Roberts’ filing also lays out broader allegations against George, including campaign finance irregularities, misuse of government resources and conduct related to the separate misdemeanor misrepresentation-of-identity charge he still faces.

George formally contested the removal effort in a March 23 filing, when his attorney Jared Woodfill denied “each and every allegation” in Roberts’ amended petition and asked the court to rule in George’s favor.

See here for the previous update. According to the story, this is “the first time in modern county history that a sitting county judge has been suspended from office”. Congratulations on finding a new way to make history, I guess. I assumed that Fort Bend County Commissioners Court would have eventually removed him, and I guess that could still happen. I’m definitely not up on the relevant laws here. I don’t care for naming one of the candidates the interim Judge, for the same reason that I was not on board with Harris County Commissioners Court anointing a successor to Christian Menefee as County Attorney and was glad that they named as the interim someone who was not on the ballot. In this case it was a judge and not the Court, but the principle stands. It’s not right to try to influence the voters in this way.

Again, maybe this is even more temporary, and their Court will name someone to serve out the year. Whatever does happen, this has been a truly wild year in Fort Bend County. May y’all live in more boring times in 2027.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, Election 2026, Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The El Paso connection to Minneapolis

Good stuff.

As hundreds of federal immigration agents flooded into Minnesota for Operation Metro Surge, this winter, flights filled with detainees ramped up at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.

Thousands of miles away, in El Paso, Marisa Limón Garza’s phone started ringing — attorneys, families, friends and friends of friends asking if she could find their loved ones.

“‘Can you go check on my person? Can you make sure they’re OK?’” Garza said, of the calls her staff received at Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center.

For Garza, executive director at Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, it was a reminder that even in Texas, which has the highest number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention centers in the country, it was not business as usual.

ICE has long transferred detainees across state lines. But a Sahan Journal analysis in December found that during Operation Metro Surge, more Minnesotans were being transferred out of state — and more quickly — often cutting them off from their families and legal counsel.

In the information vacuum, families and attorneys began calling the people who knew the system best: immigrant advocates on the ground in Texas who became an emergency support system for people they did not expect to serve.

The need for support crystallized ongoing efforts to centralise a response system in Texas. Last week, Together and Free, a local organization launched a detainee hotline in collaboration with other local service providers, advocates and aid workers to help locate people detained in El Paso by consulting with the most relevant organization. The hotline can also help people consult an attorney for legal information, if not representation.

“That’s probably the only good thing to come out of this chaos is a coordination of resources and communication,” Imelda Maynard, legal services director at El Paso-based Estrella del Paso, told Sahan Journal. “It’s definitely made all of us see the need to be coordinated not just regionally, but also nationally.”

[…]

[Daniel] Hatoum said that local organizations like the Texas Civil Rights Project have long been on the front lines because of their proximity to the border. “And now the border is everywhere,” he said.

“The border came to Minnesota in the form of CBP, in the form of excessive force. And now, when it hits other states, we’re still here. We’re still finding a way to help them out.”

“The border is everywhere” is a good way to think about our current situation. This story was originally published in the Minnesota-based Sahan Journal and republished by El Paso Matters, which is how I found it. One consolation we can take from these terrible times is that the forces for good have had to step up their games, in organizing and collaborating and innovating. That is not only having a positive effect now, it should serve us all well going forward. You want to look for the helpers, here they are. And we can all do like they’re doing, too.

Posted in La Migra | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dan Patrick has the blues

Not the sort of thing our boy Danno usually says.

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick on Wednesday said Texas Republicans are “going to have a tough time” holding onto their majority in the state House this fall, the latest and perhaps most notable sign yet of GOP unease about the midterm elections.

Speaking at the Texas Public Policy Foundation’s annual conference in Austin, Patrick said it is imperative for the loser of Republicans’ rancorous Senate primary runoff — whether it’s U.S. Sen. John Cornyn or Attorney General Ken Paxton — to support the winner against Democratic candidate James Talarico. The Austin state representative locked up his party’s nomination in March and will face whoever emerges from the May 26 GOP election, which has already seen both candidates resume their mudslinging after a vicious first round.

Without a unifying endorsement from the runoff loser, Patrick cautioned, Republicans could lose the Senate seat, an outcome he said would guarantee Democratic control of the upper chamber in Washington. A divided GOP also could imperil down-ballot candidates, he added, pointing to the 2018 midterms when U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz narrowly defeated former El Paso congressman Beto O’Rourke and a recent special election for a ruby red Texas Senate seat won by a Democrat in a district President Donald Trump had carried by 17 points in 2024.

“Get over it and come together as one,” Patrick said, aiming his comments at Cornyn and Paxton. “We’re going to have a tough time holding the Texas House.”

[…]

House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, responded to Patrick’s remark on social media without mentioning his counterpart by name.

“We will not lose the Texas House. We will fight to retain every Republican seat,” Burrows said. “I look forward to the fall campaign where we get to talk about Texas’ prosperity under Republican leadership; and, I trust the voters of Texas to continue to vote for conservative government up and down the ballot!”

State Rep. Christina Morales of Houston, who chairs House Democrats’ campaign arm, said Patrick’s warning was well founded and pointed to factors like high everyday costs, Republicans’ school voucher program and federal deportation efforts.

“Dan Patrick is telling Republicans they’re in trouble in November, and for once, he’s telling the truth,” Morales said in a statement. “We have never been closer and we are not slowing down.”

Do keep in mind the audience Patrick was speaking to. The implicit message here is “and so you rich MFers better dig deep and throw a lot of money at us, or else”. I’m not saying that Patrick doesn’t believe Republicans are in for a rough year – he clearly does. It’s just that Republicans like him tend to have an “a lion does not concern himself about sheep” attitude when it comes to the Democrats as a whole. They’ll sound alarms about specific Democrats, like Beto and now Talarico, who are raising a bunch of money – again, that angle is paramount – but this kind of talk is extremely rare. I can’t remember the last example offhand.

Again, this is a mix of posturing and worry, I’m just not sure how much of each. Patrick didn’t like seeing Sen. Taylor Rehmet win that special election, and I’m sure he doesn’t like all the chatter from national Republicans, because he knows the overall environment will have an effect here. He’s also sending a message to his colleagues. He can’t get Cornyn and Paxton to knock it off, but he can try to get Abbott and Paxton, and Paxton and Kelly Hancock to maybe reel it in a bit.

Anyway. I don’t want to add to poor Danny’s anxiety, but you might want to check out this map by G. Elliott Morris, in which he breaks down Trump’s approval ratings not just by state, but by Congressional district and Census Public Use Microdata Area (PUMA) — a geographic division of roughly 100,000 adults. Zoom in and roam around Texas, it’s quite illuminating. He also has a more recent offering that shows how Trump is underwater in 135 GOP-held Congressional districts plus Trump-won states. On the first page of the chart, at -12 or worse, there are six Texas CDs plus the state itself. Have a look, and imagine how nervous all this would make Dan Patrick.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Drill, baby, drill (for water)

Checking in on Corpus Christi and it surrounding areas.

Dwindling levels in this region’s main reservoirs have triggered a rush on local aquifers as cities, towns, chemical plants and ranchers drill for water.

The nearby city of Corpus Christi faces a looming catastrophe from the imminent depletion of water supplies that sustain 500,000 people and one of Texas’s main industrial complexes. Recent emergency groundwater projects have pushed off the timeline to disaster by months, officials said last week. But locals fear they may threaten the water supplies of rural towns and residents who have historically relied on their own small wells.

“People like me are probably gonna be running out of water,” said Bruce Mumme, a retired chemical plant worker who lives on family land in rural Jim Wells County, about 40 miles outside Corpus Christi. “Then this property and house is useless.”

Dust covers the fields where hay for Mumme’s cattle should grow. His catfish are about to die as the last of their pond evaporates. Sand dunes have started to form. He’s roamed this land since he was a boy and he’s never seen sand dunes.

“Without water we can’t even live out here,” he said as he drove dirt roads of the land his grandfather bought. “You can’t feed cows bottled water.”

Last fall, after the city of Corpus Christi first began pumping millions of gallons per day from the Evangeline Aquifer, towns and landowners across this area saw water levels in their wells drop. Mumme lost access to water for three days while he waited for workers to come lower his pump, which he said cost thousands of dollars. After that experience, he paid $30,000 to add another well on his property, for backup.

He’s not the only one. The region’s largest industrial water users are also drilling wells, according to officials. In Nueces County, where Corpus Christi is located, newly planned pumping projects alone could add up to over 1,000 percent of what the state water plan considers a sustainable rate of withdrawal from aquifers.

In March, Corpus Christi began pumping millions more gallons per day from its wellfield on the western banks of the Nueces River, about 15 miles outside the city, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott waived permitting processes for the project in a bid to avert a water shortage. Across the river, drill rigs are turning at the city’s eastern wellfield.

“I’ve done a lot of big projects in my career,” said Rik Allbritton, an operations manager for Weisinger Inc. with 40 years drilling experience, as a rig roared behind him at the eastern wellfield last Tuesday. “This is on the bigger side.”

These two projects, each containing clusters of several large water wells, aim to pump tens of millions of gallons per day in coming months. More than 20 miles away, in San Patricio County, piping has arrived for a third wellfield. A fourth and fifth are also in the queue along the Nueces River.

The region’s largest water user, a massive, new plastics plant operated by ExxonMobil and the Saudi state oil company, also drilled test wells recently but found water that was too salty to use, according to Corpus Christi city manager Peter Zanoni.

“They continue to look for alternative water sources,” Zanoni said in an interview. “Several of the big companies are doing that, and the choice is really just groundwater.”

[…]

Many factors contributed to this situation. Five consecutive years of record heat and drought have dried up the region’s reservoirs, while large-scale pumping of the state’s inland aquifers has killed springs that used to feed local tributaries.

Miller attributes the predicament primarily to poor planning. In the last 15 years, this region welcomed a spate of downstream industrial projects, including massive petrochemical plants by Exxon and Occidental Chemical, as well as expansions at Valero and Flint Hills refineries.

While those and other projects came online, the city tried fruitlessly to develop designs for a seawater desalination plant, which Miller considered ill-conceived.

“We did not simultaneously add new water supply,” Miller said. “We thought everything was going to be OK. But it was not going to be OK. And we should have known better.”

By all accounts, leaders in Texas watched this crisis approach for generations. Now the plight of Corpus Christi might await other parts of the state, according to Larry Soward, a former commissioner of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

Soward joined the Texas Water Quality Board as a staff attorney in 1975, became executive director of the Texas Water Commission in the 1980s and served as chief counsel on water for Agriculture Commissioner Rick Perry in the 1990s. All along, he said, everyone knew Texas was on course to outgrow its water supply.

The state hasn’t been able to build new reservoirs since the 1960s. As water demand crept upwards through the decades, no comprehensive plans to keep up emerged.

The crisis in Corpus Christi, he said, “seems like a ready-shoot-aim type thing.”

“The reasons this floundered is the same reason that a lot of water issues in Texas have floundered,” Soward said. “There’s been a lack of realistic planning.”

See herehere, and here for the background. We have indeed been talking about this for awhile – see this post from 2012 for an example. Maybe this time will be different, maybe this time there will be some careful long-term planning in addition to whatever expedient short-term solutions get enacted. Not where I’d put my money, but it sure does sound bad this time. Maybe we’ll get that big storm and that will help out. You never know.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Here come the WalMart drones

Look, up in the sky

A fleet of drones is taking flight across the greater Houston region today, as Walmart launches its first drone delivery service in the city.

The retail behemoth is partnering with Wing, a drone delivery company owned by Google’s parent company Alphabet, to let customers in the Houston region to order groceries and household essentials from five area Walmart stores in as little as 30 minutes.

The partnership between the companies first launched in 2022, when Walmart sent Wing drones flying from several stores in the Dallas area. Houston marks the first new market for the drone delivery service in 2026, and the companies plan to be coast-to-coast by the end of this year, with Wing drones flying from Walmart stores in cities including Miami and Los Angeles.

Heather Rivera, Wing’s chief business officer, said in an interview that the advantages of drone delivery are straightforward.

“It’s an incredibly convenient and very, very fast way to get what you need, when you need it,” she said.

In addition to that, she continued, drones don’t have to deal with Houston traffic.

Wing’s drones will “nest” at five Walmart supercenters in the region—two in Katy, one in Crosby, one in Kemah and one in northwest Houston, where a ribbon-cutting was held Thursday morning.

[…]

“At the end of the day, what we’re doing is we’re saving customers time,” she said. “I think that there’s ways for all of these services to really work really well together.”

Many of Wing’s customers to date, she continued, have never ordered small items for delivery via drone before. But the company’s service has proven popular in its first markets; on the eve of the Houston launch, Wing had completed about 750,000 deliveries with its various partners.

“What we’ve generally found is that once a consumer places their first order, they come back and they place another one,” Rivera said.

If you say so. I can believe the saving time part of this, given the location of the WalMarts involved in the drone delivery. The WalMart on Yale near I-10 is a five-minute drive from my house. I’m quite certain I could get whatever I needed from WalMart, on the rare occasion I do need something from WalMart, and be back home with it in less than the 30-minute minimum for drone delivery nearly all of the time. I doubt that would be true for anyone who shops at one of the supercenter locations. This was from January, it’s been in the drafts for awhile, but now that this is a thing, has anyone used it? Seen it? I can’t say that I have.

As with our flying taxi future, I’m sure there will be a high-profile failure of the technology at some point. As noxious as Houston traffic can be, falling objects are usually not one of the hazards to avoid. That’s not necessarily the case anymore. WalMart has made use of other autonomous delivery services in the past, I wonder if this is an expansion of that or a replacement for it. At least one assumes there are humans at the back end of this, loading the goodies onto the drones. For now, anyway. The Dallas Observer has some tips on protecting your privacy from these drones, and TechCrunch has more.

Posted in Bidness, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lawsuit filed over ban on smokable hemp

To be expected.

Texas hemp industry leaders and advocacy groups have sued the state to block new regulations that eliminate natural smokeable hemp products and increase licensing fees.

The Texas Hemp Business Council, Hemp Industry & Farmers of America, and several Texas-based dispensaries and manufacturers filed for a temporary restraining order against the Texas Department of State Health Services and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission on Tuesday, alleging that the agencies have overstepped their constitutional authority by rewriting the statutory definitions of hemp established by lawmakers in 2019.

“Under current Texas law, hemp is defined by its delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3%,” said David Sergi, an attorney for the hemp coalition, in a press release. “These Texas officials and state agencies are clearly attempting to create new law in direct contradiction to what the Texas legislature intended.”

Attorney General Ken Paxton and DSHS have not responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit.

DSHS released regulations on consumable hemp-derived THC products that went into effect on March 31. These new regulations include child-resistant packaging, a significant increase in licensing fees, new labeling, testing, and bookkeeping requirements. The rules also codify the legal purchasing age to 21, which went into effect last year as an emergency directive.

However, the lawsuit calls out two rules that reduce the total THC content in products they sell to 0.3% and increase licensing fees for manufacturers of hemp-derived THC from $258 to $10,000 per facility and retail registrations from $155 to $5,000.

“The Texas hemp business community is not challenging rules related to age verification or consumer protections. They wholeheartedly support those regulations, as they fall within the agency’s authority,” said Sergi. “We are seeking to halt rules that would effectively end the in-state production of hemp and the sale of hemp products—items the Legislature chose not to ban during recent legislative and special sessions.”

[…]

Under the new rules, laboratories tests now measure the total amount of any THC in a product. If the THC levels exceed the 0.3% threshold, even if it’s only activated upon being smoked, the product will be noncompliant under state regulations. As a result, some of the most popular hemp products, like THCA flower and pre-rolled joints, have been banned.

“An administrative agency may not substitute its own policy judgment for the outcome produced by the constitutional lawmaking process,” the lawsuit states. “The Texas Constitution vests legislative power in the Legislature, not administrative agencies.”

See here, here, here, and here for some background. This bears a resemblance to the Historically Underutilized Business Program lawsuit, in that it argues that the entity making the change exceeded its authority in attempting to do something that the Legislature chose not to do. Seems like a sound legal strategy, we’ll see if the state’s response is more robust than “nuh uh”. The Current has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Council passes ordinance to limit HPD’s interactions with ICE

Good.

Alejandra Salinas

Houston City Council approved a proposal from three city council members limiting Houston police officers’ cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents on Wednesday, with Mayor John Whitmire in support.

The proposal by Council Members Alejandra Salinas, Edward Pollard and Abbie Kamin eliminates a requirement that officers wait 30 minutes for federal agents to pick people up on non-criminal ICE administrative warrants, and requires police leaders to compile reports on the department’s cooperation with ICE.

The proposal passed 12-5, with conservative Council Members Amy Peck, Fred Flickinger, Mary Nan Huffman, Willie Davis and Twila Carter opposed.

The item erases a policy change Whitmire and Police Chief Noe Diaz announced just a few weeks ago after the Houston Chronicle reported that HPD officers in at least two cases had transported drivers to ICE agents, despite ICE administrative warrants being civil documents that do not on their own give officers the authority to make arrests.

Whitmire’s policy tweak said officers should wait 30 minutes for an ICE agent to pick up a person detained with a civil ICE warrant, and said the officer should call their sergeant to the scene.

Salinas, Kamin and Pollard felt that change didn’t sufficiently limit how the Houston Police Department works with ICE, and filed their proposed ordinance under Proposition A, a 2023 city charter amendment that allows any three council members to add an item to a meeting agenda as long as it’s legal. The charter typically gives only the mayor the power to place items on the agenda.

[…]

Several council members spoke in favor of the proposal before its passage Wednesday.

“The current federal immigration dragnet and HPD policies are putting officers in an impossible situation,” said Council Member Julian Ramirez. “Following policies, they’ve called ICE on a battered woman, on a woman stranded at Hobby Airport, and on a woman who flagged down officers on Washington Avenue to report a crash.”

Ramirez said he supported the initiative because he’d learned during his time as a prosecutor that officers often need undocumented immigrants to help put criminals behind bars. He added the ordinance would make everyone safer and that effective law enforcement relied on the public’s trust.

“Do we want to have the most effective force possible to enforce serious state crimes and city ordinances, one the immigrant community trusts, or do we want a deportation force that enforces federal rule violations? Because you can’t have both,” Ramirez said. “I know which one I want.”

[…]

Ahead of Wednesday’s vote, Salinas emphasized the discussion wouldn’t be the council’s last on the issue, saying her office would continue to push back on the legal opinion that removed the proposal’s attempt to give HPD officers discretion in when to call ICE.

See here and here for the background. I’m glad this happened – major kudos to CMs Salinas, Kamin, and Pollard for putting it forward – and I’m glad that everyone who should have voted for it did so. I agree with CM Salinas that there is more to do on this, and I look forward to further efforts. Houston Public Media has more.

UPDATE: My, my, my.

In a stinging loss of a staunch ally, Houston Mayor John Whitmire will not receive the Houston Police Officers’ Union’s endorsement because he voted for an ordinance limiting the police department’s coordination with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Wednesday.

“I was blown away by that because originally he was with us and thought it was a horrible idea,” union president Douglas Griffith told Houston Public Media. “All we want to do is go out and do our jobs as police officers. We don’t care about the politics. But then, when the mayor signed off on it, it blew me away. I don’t support any of them that supported this. I just don’t. And moving forward, I will not support them.”

During the city council meeting Wednesday morning, Whitmire voted in favor of a measure prohibiting officers from detaining or prolonging traffic stops due to civil immigration warrants.

[…]

“I think it’s potentially a rash overreaction by the police officers’ union,” said political scientist Mark Jones with Rice University. “Clearly, they oppose this adopted policy, but also Mayor Whitmire has been probably more in sync with them in terms of law enforcement than any mayor in recent memory.”

Looking ahead to the next round of municipal elections, Jones said, “The police officers’ union may very well find itself in 2027 with a situation where, among the credible alternatives to be mayor, John Whitmire is the one who is closest to them on policies regardless of this one difference today.”

I agree with Mark Jones. Does the HPOU really think they’re going to get someone friendlier to them as Mayor than John Whitmire? Good luck with that.

Posted in La Migra, Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

We have our first real voucher loophole

Surely not the last.

A Florida-based virtual school could receive Texas taxpayer funds through the state’s new $1 billion private school voucher program, despite provisions in the law meant to block out-of-state schools from joining the program.

State records show that the Texas Comptroller’s office approved NFC Academy — North Forest Baptist Church Academy based in Tallahassee — to participate in the voucher program on March 13. The school, which teaches a biblical worldview to students in grades K-12, had been “pursuing approval” for the Texas program, according to its website.

Texas vouchers can go to different providers, including private and virtual schools, pre-K programs, homeschool materials and other vendors, like therapists or tutors.

Vendors and private schools have different eligibility requirements. But NFC Academy appears to have entered the program through a potential loophole between how the two categories are defined — allowing out-of-state schools to receive state funds if they are “acting as a vendor.”

The school was only allowed on the program as a vendor — not as a virtual school — and therefore is not eligible for the full funding amount of $10,500 for private schools, according to the Texas Comptroller’s office. However, it is still listed as an online school on the state’s map.

Dee Carney, director of the Texas Center for Voucher Transparency, said the Florida school’s approval goes back to a key question she has been asking about the voucher program: “Who’s benefiting: private entities or the Texas public?”

[…]

Experts say the law leaves a gray area for out-of-state schools that join Texas’ program as online vendors.

Carney also said approving an out-of-state school “doesn’t seem to follow legislative intent that it needs to be located in the state.”

The Texas Education Code under Section 29.358 states that the comptroller may only approve an education service provider located in Texas or “a vendor of educational products registered to do business in this state.”

NFC Academy is not technically a vendor of educational products, but it applied to the Texas Education Freedom Accounts as a vendor and was approved as a “private school acting as a vendor of educational products or services,” according to state data. The school is registered to do business in Texas, according to the school’s director, Rick Fielding.

Pillow with the comptroller’s office said that while NFC Academy is listed as an online school on the state’s school map, they are only authorized to provide services that a vendor could provide, such as online courses or tutoring. He said all private schools need to follow the rules established by the comptroller’s office, which require schools to have “a physical location in the state of Texas.”

For virtual schools, “they need to be registered to do business in the state and, at a minimum, have an administration office that employs at least one Texas resident and attends to their business with the TEFA program,” the rules say. “They also need to show that their accreditation and other qualifications to participate in the program cover their Texas operations.”

[…]

When state senators debated the voucher program in April 2025, the participation of out-of-state schools came up.

State Sen. José Menéndez, D-San Antonio, was discussing a proposed amendment to clarify that schools could not be located outside of Texas. Former state Sen. Brandon Creighton — a Republican from Conroe and the primary author of Senate Bill 2, also known as the Texas Education Freedom Act — ensured that the amendment stayed in the next version of the bill, saying that the bill’s intent was not to allow schools from other states to “siphon funds” from the program.

“The bill still requires all participating schools to be physically based in Texas so out-of-state virtual chains cannot come in and siphon funds,” Creighton told Menéndez.

And yet here we are. The most straightforward answer I can come up with is that the Comptroller made an incorrect decision, and the least they can do is review it. I doubt they’re likely to do that without feeling some pressure, and it’s not clear to me where any pressure that they would feel would come. They’re not going to care if Democrats carp about it. So don’t expect anything to happen here. But do expect this to happen again.

Posted in School days, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of April 6

The Texas Progressive Alliance wrote most of this week’s roundup while in a TSA line at Hobby Airport.

Off the Kuff has another bonkers update from Loving County.

SocraticGadfly read Reality Winner’s new memoir and was less than totally impressed while also having new questions about undiscussed portions of her childhood.

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project reported on Houston City Council public comment session focused on Salinas/Pollard/Kamin HPD/ICE ordinance & asked if there was any authoritarian threat at all the City of Houston would confront.

=========================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

The Texas Signal discusses the new “smart” border wall.

Your Local Epidemiologist breaks down the recent jury verdicts against social media companies.

Law Dork analyzes the SCOTUS hearing on birthright citizenship.

Texas Rural Reporter reminds us that a lot of important legislative work is going on right now.

The Barbed Wire talks to a nonbinary educator to check on what it’s like for them in the schools now.

John Coby tells of his very positive experiences owning an electric car.

The TPA is sad to hear about the closure of the Fort Bend Star, a local publication since 1977. We wish them all well with whatever comes next.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The takeover biz has been good for Mike Miles

Just raking it in.

As more Texas school districts face the threat of a state takeover, they are turning to a charter network founded by Houston ISD Superintendent Mike Miles to try to avoid it.

At least seven school districts — EdgewoodEvermanHempsteadKilleenSan AntonioTexarkana and Waco ISDs — are moving to partner with Third Future Schools to turn around 12 schools, according to school district board documents and announcements. Wichita Falls ISD is expanding its existing partnership to two additional schools and Midland ISD to one more school.

Those partnerships would add 15 schools to the charter network’s portfolio, doubling its national footprint.

The growth comes as districts across Texas face pressure to improve struggling campuses or risk a state takeover that strips elected school boards of control.

Third Future Schools, based in Colorado, was founded by Miles before Texas appointed him in 2023 to lead Houston ISD following the state’s takeover of the district for low performance at one high school. Now, as more districts face similar consequences tied to repeated low ratings, they are turning to the charter network he built.

At the center of those partnerships is an instructional model Miles has said mirrors the New Education System he implemented in HISD.

“The NES model (and the model used by Third Future Schools) developed by Mike Miles is the only proven instructional methodology that has been able to consistently turn around failing campuses quickly,” Miles co-wrote in a July proposal to improve instruction at International Leadership of Texas, a charter school network.

Like Houston ISD, Third Future Schools uses a structured model that includes 45 minutes of instruction, followed by a daily quiz called a “demonstration of learning,” and a targeted repeat of the lesson for students who don’t understand the material based on that quiz.

[…]

A school district publishes a “call for quality schools” to invite organizations to apply to run campuses, according to guidance from the Texas Education Agency. That callout should include an overview of a partner’s roles and responsibilities, student demographic data and community priorities for the school.

In several cases, Third Future Schools was the only group that applied.

Hempstead, Everman, Waco and Wichita Falls ISDs each said it received a single applicant in response to their calls.

The TEA said Third Future Schools is not the only approved charter management organization for turnaround partnerships. The TEA can offer guidance and resources to navigate the partnership process, the agency said, but the district chooses its operating partner.

[…]

Third Future’s Superintendent Zach Craddock — introduced to San Antonio’s Board of Trustees as “the one turnaround in Texas, that’s approved by the Texas Education Agency” — told the San Antonio school board that Miles “took the TFS instructional model and applied it wholescale in Houston.”

“The way we go about it is a little bit different,” Craddock said in February, without giving additional details.

Craddock said then that Third Future Schools’ network bylaws prohibit its share from exceeding 10% of state money, and 90% of the partnership money goes back to the campus.

Craddock said the district would take 6% to 8% of state revenue. Third Future likes to purchase back transportation, custodial, school nurse and utility services. Funds stay in Texas and each state has a 501(c)(3), with “no commingling of funds,” Craddock said.

Maybe if we had as much insight into Third Future’s books as we do with ISDs’ budgets, so that we knew exactly what they were doing with our tax dollars, I’d feel better about this. Maybe if there were any studies that showed the Third Future/NES way did more than just generate short-term increases in standard test scores, that they led to long-term improvements in learning and achievement, I’d feel better about this. Maybe if there were some alternatives to Third Future that school districts whose backs were up against the wall could explore so that it’s not just the same old thing every time, I’d feel better about this. Maybe if Texas fully funded its public schools, so that we could all believe that the failures were of execution and not socioeconomics and lack of resources, I’d feel better about this. Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe. In the meantime, it sure is good to be Mike Miles. The Texas Observer has more.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Tony Gonzales really is a creep

Ewwww.

Rep. Tony Gonzales

Late on a June night in 2020, amid a nail-biter of a GOP primary runoff, then-congressional candidate Tony Gonzales quickly turned a conversation with his campaign’s political director from casual to intimate.

Gonzales texted that she was a “smart girl” in response to frustrations she had expressed about dating. He used a diamond emoji to convey that she was special and shouldn’t “settle.”

Then, he asked when she normally went to sleep. Next, he asked what she would wear to bed.

Soon, it was “What kind of panties do you wear?”

Within hours, the married Navy veteran from San Antonio was asking for nude photos and describing how he wanted to have sex with her and have her “squeeze my balls.”

At the end of the night, after she replied “Nope” to yet another request for a photo, he replied, “47 nos is about my limit.”

The next day, the father of six again asked for a picture. And again the day after.

“I know what I want and won’t stop until I get it,” he said in a text on June 15, 2020.

She responded with a facepalm emoji. “You better do that in Congress,” she said. “And take me with you.”

The previously-unreported messages — and hundreds of others obtained by the San Antonio Express-News — show the congressman pursued a sexual relationship with a subordinate years before his 2024 affair with a married congressional staffer who later committed suicide.

See here and here for some background. In the year of our Lord 2026, none of us should be surprised to learn that a dude we already knew was a creep has in fact been a creep for longer than we originally thought. Some of these guys, I don’t know how they have the time to do anything else, with all of the sexting and other gross things they seem to be able to do whenever they feel like it. I’m sorry this unnamed woman, who I hope is able to maintain her anonymity, had to go through this. There were already some calls for Rep. Gonzales to resign. I wonder if there will now be more. The Current has more.

Posted in Scandalized! | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Gregg Phillips continues to be a weirdo

Your federal government at work.

Gregg Phillips, President Donald Trump’s top disaster response appointee, has drawn national headlines over claims he has teleported–not once, but twice–including an experience that apparently brought him to a Waffle House in Georgia.

But this isn’t the first time Phillips, who has defended his remarks as part of his religious beliefs, has been in the spotlight for the wrong reasons.

The far-right conservative now oversees response and recovery for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). However, his ties to Texas conservatism include a stint in state health leadership, controversial contracting work and a role with Houston-based True the Vote, a group that helped elevate him to national prominence while promoting widely-disputed claims of voter fraud.

A series of podcast stints over the past year revealed his teleportation escapade, according to reporting by CNN.

During an episode of the podcast “Onward”, co-hosted by Austin resident Catherine Engelbrecht, Phillips reportedly claimed, “we had a teleport incident–two of them–and I ended up at a Waffle House like 50 miles away,” he said.

“It was an incredibly frightening moment, to experience yourself, in your car, flying through the air–I will tell you, teleporting is no fun,” he stated.

In a recent Truth Social post, he claimed the teleportation aspect has been “taken out of context,” and that he was undergoing “intensive treatment” for a cancer diagnosis and was “heavily medicated” when the podcast was filmed.

However, he does not deny teleporting altogether, “The more accurate biblical terms are ‘translated’ or ‘transported’ — not new ideas for people of faith,” he wrote.

“If you believe that God moves in ways we cannot fully explain, as I do, then having faith is not a soundbite. It is the whole point,” said Phillips.

Phillips was appointed by Trump to take on the senior FEMA position in December, overseeing billions of dollars in disaster assistance funding, search-and-rescue operations, and coordination with local, state and federal resources for emergency aid.

Here’s the CNN story about teleportation referenced in the article. The New York Times did the yeoman’s work of attempting to fact-check the claim; to no one’s surprise, no one at the Waffle House in question remembered seeing Phillips. A better illustration of who this guy is comes in this slightly earlier CNN story, which also notes the teleportation thing. I mean, why would anyone mess with TSA security lines if you can travel this way? There’s a business opportunity going to waste here.

Those of you who have read this blog for awhile will of course recognize the names Gregg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht. Phillips has been a rancid character in our state’s politics going back over 20 years now, and Engelbrecht is a great example of how grifters flock together. I know you don’t need more reasons to be motivated to win this November and again in two years, but do remember that when Democrats have power, malignant tumors like these two don’t get to live off of your tax dollars. You should also read this Slate story about where the bizarre and sinister beliefs that animate the likes of Gregg Phillips come from. It’s very weird, but it’s not as niche as you might think. And unfortunately, in many ways it’s no laughing matter.

Posted in Scandalized! | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Was the District C special election an inflection point?

An interesting hypothesis from Chron editorial page honcho Evan Mintz.

Joe Panzarella

Don’t be fooled by the fact that the race is going to a runoff — Saturday’s special election for City Council District C was a blowout. Houston progressives were the winner.

Yes, voters will be returning for a showdown between Joe Panzarella, a community organizer who led with 33.3% of the vote, and Nick Hellyar, a longtime City Hall staffer who had 22.5%. But there were seven candidates in the race and Hellyar was basically the only serious contender running as anything but a proud progressive. That should’ve allowed Hellyar to consolidate the non-progressive vote and emerge as a clear frontrunner while others divided the left-leaning pie six ways.

That didn’t happen — and it should have Houston politicos paying attention.

In our local nonpartisan elections, you’ll often see candidates win by pulling together a coalition that includes both Republicans and Democrats.

Hellyar was the only one out of the seven Democrats trying that tactic. For example, he was endorsed by conservative groups like the Houston Police Officers Union, and some voters received a flyer touting his support from Ben Proler, who served as the national chairman for Maverick PAC, which helps to elect Republicans and counts Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. Wesley Hunt among its alumni.

[…]

In this political atmosphere, the reality is that very few Democratic voters are going to line up behind any candidate willing to play nice with Team Trump — even in nonpartisan races.

In fact, the top progressive candidates for District C — including Audrey Nath, who backed the local Democratic movement to condemn Mayor John Whitmire, and Army veteran Patrick Oathout, who was basically running against President Donald Trump — received more than two-thirds of the vote total. And that isn’t even counting left-leaning candidates who got single-digit shares.

That’s a political bombshell for Houston. After all, District C today may be Democratic, but it is hardly a pillar of progressive politics. The district went for Whitmire in 2023 and was won by Bill King in the 2015 mayoral runoff. In fact, District C has a history of electing Republicans to City Council, such as Anne ClutterbuckMark Goldberg, and Martha Wong.

District C did indeed go strongly for Mayor Whitmire in 2023, both in November and December. I’d venture that the special election is a reflection of the disenchantment that a significant portion of the District C electorate feels about the Mayor and his local policies at least as much as it is about Donald Trump, but I will agree that there’s a connection between the two. There are definitely people in District C who approve of the changes made to the Montrose Blvd redesign, and who would love to see the West 11th bike lane taken out, but they were greatly outnumbered, both in the candidate lineup and in the vote.

I’m a little surprised that Evan didn’t mention the Alejandra Salinas victory in the At Large #4 runoff, which was also by a substantial margin, as a precursor to this. CM Salinas criticized Mayor Whitmire for his belated admission about HPD’s cooperation with ICE, and is now leading the charge to codify some limits on it. I do think, as Evan suggests, that the way this vote goes will tell us something about what to expect in 2027, especially from Democratic Council members who will be on the ballot that year, as well as the Mayor himself. I’ll be watching for that.

Anyway. Whatever the case with this election, there’s still a runoff for Panzarella to win for any of this to matter. Turnout will be low, because that’s the nature of runoffs, but maybe not much lower than this election because now the choice is clearer than it was in the seven-candidate field and we’re likely to see a bit more aggression in the campaigns. Get ready to vote again, District C.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Bennett School

Lots to think about in here.

When junior Karson Reeder stepped off the mound in the fifth inning of the UIL Class 6A Division II state championship game last June, he had thrown his last pitch for Tomball High School.

Instead of returning to Tomball for his senior season and perhaps a third trip to state, Reeder enrolled at The Bennett School, a baseball-centered institution powered by the Texas Sports Academy and the Austin-based AI-propelled Alpha School.

Reeder, who has signed to play with the University of Texas, said the decision to leave Tomball was not made lightly.

“I can get all the development I need with the best coaches,” he said. “I’ve been there, done that, and I don’t have to over-pitch, throw another 100 innings. I think it’s a good opportunity and play against the best and not just dominate the teams that are not as good. Get in there, play the best competition, really prepare yourself.”

The Bennett School is the first high school and middle school sports academy of its kind in the Houston area. Utilizing the Alpha School curriculum — a two-hours-per-day learning model powered by artificial intelligence — students are able to complete the academic portion of their day in the morning and spend the afternoon focusing on baseball development.

Texas Sports Academy is essentially the athletics division of the Alpha School. With several locations across Texas — including Dallas, Austin and San Antonio — the organization has schools focused on multiple activities, from basketball to gymnastics to martial arts. The Bennett School has gained notoriety since its opening for its untraditional academic structure, but also because several of the top high school baseball players in the Houston area have chosen to join the program.

[…]

Alpha School and Texas Sports Academy officials say the AI-based programs they use can help accelerate and boost learning in a variety of ways. According to Lamar Cannon, the head of partnerships for Texas Sports Academy, one of the biggest benefits the academic structure offers is giving what was previously classroom time back to the students and their and families. It’s one of the most distinct departures from traditional schooling, which requires more hours during the day.

“We believe that model is kind of outdated,” said Cannon, the brother of former Texans and Patriots offensive lineman Marcus Cannon. “A lot of students, if you talk to them, you realize that they’re wasting six hours a day in school. We’re kind of giving the kids their time back. Students are able to learn two to six times faster with this academic structure than with traditional school because there’s individualized tutoring that happens with the AI app. It meets the students where they’re at.”

The Alpha School website makes several claims about its effectiveness, including that its students experience 2.6-times-faster growth than peers on nationally normed Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) tests and that a majority of them consistently outperform national averages. It also says the top performers achieve up to 6.5-times faster growth.

When vouching for the Alpha School efficacy, Cannon referenced the “2 Sigma Problem” study, conducted by Benjamin Bloom, an American educational psychologist, in 1984. The primary takeaway from that study was that students who receive one-on-one tutoring perform 98% better than traditionally taught peers. It also asserts that mastery of a topic before moving forward is critical, and that veering from that concept can create learning gaps. The “problem” part of the study is that tutoring can be too expensive and resource-intensive to provide to everyone. The Alpha School claims to have solved that using AI.

“From this Bloom study, the conclusion was that this is the best way to teach kids, but it’s not scalable,” Cannon said. “We can’t have a classroom with 25 teachers, and we can’t have one teacher for every student in the United States. So the study was kind of ignored. But now, with AI, it’s possible to have individualized learning and for students to get that same tutoring.”

[…]

Tuition at The Bennett School is currently $15,000, which is significantly cheaper than the most expensive private school options in Houston, according to data compiled by the Chronicle. The school is also eligible for the statewide voucher program that was passed through legislation as Senate Bill 2 last spring. Formally known as the Texas Education Freedom Accounts (TEFA), they provide families with taxpayer funds to offset the cost of private or homeschool education. Launching with the 2026-27 school year, eligible children can receive more than $10,000 per year toward tuition at accredited private schools.

The Bennett School meets the required criteria for the voucher program, which has been pushed by Gov. Greg Abbott for several years. Those opposed to the program have raised concerns that it takes funding away from the public school system. Funding for Texas public schools is based on attendance, and even small reductions can lead to significant cutbacks. Districts across the state have to budget for a lot of fixed costs, including teacher and support staff pay, facilities operations and more.

The rise of sports academies in Texas has been met with opposition from the Texas High School Coaches Association, which issued a letter to its members in February titled “Educate. Excel. Play: A Call to Action to Protect Education-Based Athletics in the State of Texas.” It includes a checklist for high school coaches and administrators to follow in regard to the sports academies, which the organization’s leaders believe are a threat to the fabric of community-driven high school athletics. The decree from the THSCA includes not scheduling games with teams from the academies and not allowing them to rent public school facilities. It also emphasizes educating parents and promoting and reinforcing the value of public school athletics.

THSCA executive director Joe Martin said that because of the decisions made by legislators regarding the voucher program, public school administrators and coaches feel like they need to recruit their own kids simply to pay the bills.

“We feel like those academies are taking kids out of public schools, and it impacts budgets,” Martin said. “So we got together with the other associations in the state of Texas and came up with a plan to promote public schools, not to attack academies. We don’t want to change their narrative. We just want to educate everybody on ours. We want to educate everybody on all the great things public schools are doing and what our coaches are doing for our high school athletes in this state.”

Joshua Childs, a former college athlete who’s now an associate professor of educational leadership and policy at the University of Texas, said academies like The Bennett School are challenging the way school has traditionally been viewed and have created a new way to package academics with sports for young athletes aspiring to compete at the next levels.

“I think, especially since the pandemic, since 2020, the options of what schooling can look like have obviously expanded,” said Childs, who’s also a member of the communication and collaboration advisory committee for the Texas High School Coaches Association and helps the organization design curriculum for its coaches. “Parents have recognized that they have more choices and there’s more options available for how their students can learn and will learn. So I think what we’re seeing now is a shift in what education can and will look like in the future. I think the Alpha School is just one of those examples of what the market, especially in Texas, has allowed, which is the creation and expansion of a schooling model like that.”

According to Childs, the “million dollar question” is about the middle ground between traditional education and innovative options like the Alpha School. Can the gap be bridged, or are the two concepts too foreign? What kind of long-term impact will these issues have on high school athletics and the students, coaches, administrators and parents involved in them?

“I think there are more questions to be asked, but I would also say that parents and families and communities are wanting options and choices, and that I think this should be a sort of a wake-up call for those of us who care about our traditional education, our traditional public schools,” Childs said. “It’s an opportunity to really do some internal reflection about what works and what doesn’t work. And one thing that does work really well, especially in the state of Texas, is our athletics — the ways in which our public schools engage in athletics and education-based athletics. So I think there’s an avenue and a path to think about how our traditional schools can stay relevant and continue to do well and prosper.”

[…]

Tomball coach Doug Rush started coaching in 1986 and has seen how high school athletics have evolved. He believes baseball and other sports might follow in the footsteps of soccer, where Texas coaches have been battling to keep their top players from ditching the high school season in favor of playing exclusively for their club teams. Rush said that high school baseball and select baseball have co-existed for years, giving kids the opportunity to compete in both. But he believes that with the advent of academies like The Bennett School, that dynamic has begun to change.

“They just can’t really call themselves a high school,” Rush said. “It’s not high school sports. It’s just select sports, showcase sports that have been extended into the high school seasons because people found a way, or found a loophole, to make money, and that’s what they do. So they sell it as something where, if you don’t play with the elite, you’re not going to get a look (from colleges). It’s fine if they go do that. I just don’t believe schools like that belong in high school rankings. I don’t even believe they should be playing other high schools because they recruit, and they openly recruit. It is what it is. It’s fine if we have those, and I give my blessing to any kid who wants to go do it, but it’s not high school. It’s a loophole around high school.”

It’s a long and fascinating story, and you should read the whole thing, it’s a gift link. I honestly don’t know what to make of it right now. I should note before I go further that the claims of academic achievement made by the Bennett School and its siblings have not yet been subject to rigorous study, and of course we have no idea yet what the long-term implications of its model may be. I’m open to the idea that this kind of model can work very well for some number of students. I’m skeptical about the AI/self-study/virtual school part of it, and I know fully well that in the absence of strong regulations and oversight that something like this will be fertile ground for all kinds of grifters. Especially with the sports angle, as we have already seen too many examples already of questionable/bogus sports academies – two words: Bishop Sycamore – and the scams they have enabled. There are also big questions about equity that don’t get touched on at all.

That said, there’s a lot of movement in sports towards the use of technology and virtual environments for athletic development, so it makes sense for this to filter down to the high school level. Baseball in particular has seen a lot of the advancements in analytics and training migrate to college programs, which is supported by MLB because it’s basically outsourcing a lot of player development to college programs. That’s one reason why MLB has been moving towards shrinking the minor leagues – why should they pay to develop young players when the NCAA can do it for them, much as it has long done for the NFL. Moving this another notch down to high school, where players are immediately eligible for the MLB draft upon their graduation, makes perfect sense.

That may be great for the players who can get drafted, or who can put themselves on the radar for top college programs and NIL money, but it may also reduce opportunities for the kids who for now at least fill out the rest of the collegiate and minor league lineups. It also raises questions about the role of high schools in the social development of these kids – how prepared will they be for the real world and the rest of their lives, especially outside of baseball, if they’re not regularly interacting with people who aren’t in the same bubble. I certainly have my concerns with any further splintering of community into even more niche interests. But I don’t know how much weight to give to providing the opportunity to maximize one’s talents to those who would benefit from it. As I said up front, I don’t know what to make of this. I have questions, but I don’t know that the answers are obtainable yet. Here are the websites for the Sports Academy and the Bennett School if you want to do some more reading.

Posted in Baseball, School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A ride in a Waymo

Longtime Chron tech writer Dwight Silverman took a ride in a Waymo robotaxi and wrote about the experience.

When Waymo began service in Houston on Feb. 24, its vehicles had already become a common sight in the city. When they first appeared, a safety driver — or “autonomous specialist,” as Waymo calls them — was at the wheel. But over time, I’d increasingly see them with no drivers, but also sans passengers. Later, I’d spot them parked on public streets, their sensors rotating furiously as they idled. In fact, one sat outside the driveway of the condo community where I live for days at a time.

When Waymo launched, I immediately downloaded the app and signed up for an account, which put me on a waitlist. That’s the only way to get into the early-service period — and no, current riders don’t have invitations to hand out. After about two weeks, I was in.

My lovely wife and I needed to be in downtown Houston on a Saturday when a cluster of big events made parking a challenge — the No Kings protest rally, the Bayou City Art Festival, the March Madness college basketball tournament and Astros opening day weekend were all in full swing. It was a perfect opportunity to try Waymo.

The company’s service works like any other ride-hailing entity: Fire up its app, tell Waymo your current location and destination, and you’re told how long it will take before the car arrives. You can track its whereabouts in the app, and you pay an upfront price, which is based on distance and demand. (In Austin, as well as Atlanta, Waymo riders use the Uber app instead.)

When it appears and slows to a stop — not always right where you’re standing — your initials appear on a dome on the car’s roof. Although Waymo doesn’t yet carry Houston riders to and from our airports (it just started service to San Antonio’s airport on Tuesday), this feature would come in handy when a gaggle of its cars are waiting for travelers who’ve summoned them. If you allow the Waymo app to access your smartphone’s Bluetooth feature, the doors unlock and their handles extend as you approach.

Inside, the vehicle is comfortable and luxurious — after all, it’s a Jag SUV. We sat in the back, but riders can also use the front passenger seat; the driver’s seat is off-limits. Rear riders have a touchscreen between the seats, while front passengers see one on the dash. As a recording tells you want to expect, how to summon help and some basic rules, a button on the screens invites you to “Start ride.” Tap it, and off you go.

The most remarkable thing I can say about our rides in the Waymo vehicles is that they were … unremarkable. The car’s movements were smooth, with no jerky motions or unnecessary hesitations. Its driving and reactions to traffic conditions looked and felt very human. The Waymo Driver is controlled by computers and artificial intelligence in the car itself, responding to multiple sensor types: radar, lidar (like radar, but with lasers), cameras and audio. The in-cabin screens show you what the car is seeing, and what it knows about its surroundings. For example, if a car in front of you has its turn signal blinking, you’ll see it in the representation of that vehicle on the touchscreen.

You also have some control over the cabin. The touchscreens and the app let you set the AC in the car, adjust the seats and you if you are a Spotify or YouTube Music user, you can play your own tunes from your phone (Apple Music is not yet supported). If you have questions or concerns, you can tap the screen to summon help.

[…]

I will keep using Waymo in Houston. The experience is so much better than a taxi or rideshare, and less expensive. The approximately four-mile Waymo rides I booked averaged under $18 each, about $10 less than an Uber at the time, and of course there’s no tip. While I’m not too worried about safety, there is the sobering notion that if autonomous taxis become the norm, those who drive others for a living will be out of a job.

When I asked [Waymo spokesperson Chris] Bonelli about this, he contended that Waymo will create jobs. People will be needed to maintain cars, clean the sensors, charge the vehicles and more. Of course, that potential workforce is dwarfed in size by the thousands of rideshare and taxi drivers in Houston whose livelihood is threatened in an autonomous future. When I pointed that out, Bonelli had nothing more to add.

See here for more on Waymo’s arrival in Houston, and read the rest, it’s a gift link. We are not regular rideshare users – the occasional dropoff at or ride home from the airport is our most frequent use case. I prefer taking Metro to places like downtown and the Medical Center. When the day comes that I’m not a safe driver anymore, I’ll probably adapt to the new paradigms. Until then, this is more of a curiosity and a sometime alternative to renting a car when we travel. I will say that I noticed a Waymo seemingly parked on a street in my neighborhood very early in the morning a few weeks ago. I assumed it had been there all night and it makes me wonder if this is the solution Waymo is adopting for the “what do we do with these things when there’s no demand for them” question. I’d love to have a more definitive answer to that, since I doubt they have storage lots or that the cars are just roaming the streets aimlessly all night.

In other “questions about robotaxis we should know more about but don’t”, there’s this.

In a letter shared with Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Tesla admitted that its robotaxis are sometimes driven remotely by human operators, Wired reports. Competing self-driving car companies sometimes rely on human operators to tell robotaxi software how to get itself unstuck, but letting operators actually drive those cars remotely is more unusual.

“​​As a redundancy measure in rare cases … [remote assistance operators] are authorized to temporarily assume direct vehicle control as the final escalation maneuver after all other available intervention actions have been exhausted,” Karen Steakley, Tesla’s director of public policy and business development, shared in a letter to Markey. In those situations, operators are reportedly able to take over Tesla’s robotaxis when they’re moving at speeds around 2mph or less, and then drive the car at up to 10mph if software permits it.

Engadget has contacted Tesla to confirm the details shared in Steakley’s letter. We’ll update the article if we hear back.

As Wired notes, that’s a bit different than how other self-driving car companies handle human intervention. For example, Waymo’s Driver software can call on human help — Waymo calls them “fleet response” — to offer context and answer questions to help it navigate complicated driving situations. The company claims these workers never drive the robotaxi themselves, but they are able to see the car’s environment through its sensors to help it get unstuck. Self-driving car companies typically avoid remote operation, Wired writes, because technical limitations like latency and the limited perspective of a robotaxi’s sensors can make it hard to drive them easily and safely.

I’m coming to the opinion that we should start treating robotaxis like public transportation and regulate them as we would if it were our local metro transit agency. That means full transparency on pricing, utilization, accidents and crime, future plans, and so on. The idea that we could just sort of morph from a nation where most people owned their own vehicles to one where we’re all or mostly all essentially subscribing to vehicular services seems to me like something we ought to avoid, or at least have some control over. Add this to the long list of things we really need to do when we have a functional government again.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Interview with Ron Angeletti

Ron Angeletti

About two weeks ago, I mentioned that there’s a special election on May 2 in SD04, to fill out the unexpired term of now-former Sen. Brandon Creighton. I’d forgotten that he’d resigned to take the Texas Tech Chancellor gig, and so I’d forgotten this special election had been scheduled to complete his term. After the magic in SD09, we’re all more tuned into special legislative elections, so I wanted to get to know the Democratic candidate in this race, Ron Angeletti, a little better. SD04 is a tough nut to crack but Angeletti is an earnest and forthcoming candidate out there making the case for himself. A former juvenile probation officer from New Orleans, who relocated to the Houston area in 2005 for Hurricane Katrina, Angeletti is a special education teacher and advocate as well as an author. He had a lot to say about vouchers, infrastructure as a public safety matter, and more. He will be the Democratic nominee for SD04 in November as well as a candidate in the special election. Listen to the interview here:

Thanks once again to Greg Wythe, here’s a transcript of the interview. I’m about to start doing some interviews for the primary runoffs, so look for those soon as well.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Just a reminder that Trump’s tariffs suck

I have three things to say about this.

As the business manager and part owner of Houghton Horns, a specialty brass instrument store in north Texas, Kacie Wright deals with President Donald Trump’s tariffs every day.

“I wake up every morning and I check the news and see how many hours I need to spend changing prices on our website that day,” Wright said Thursday in a press call put on by We Pay the Tariffs, a coalition of more than 1,100 small business across the United States.

Prices have not come down over the past year, she continued. She cited a French horn as an example.

“Two years ago we charged $3,024.75 and today we’d charge $3,685.13,” Wright said. “Plus, we had to cut out a lot of the accessories — they used to come with a mouthpiece and cleaning kit. So customers are paying 20% more for less.”

Several other small business owners on the call said that they have had similar experiences. Costs have risen. Sales have fallen. Cash flow has been tight. Paperwork has proliferated and persistent uncertainty over tariff policies is stifling consumer demand and creating a daily headache for small business owners who are already contending with narrow margins and significant inflation.

It has been nearly a year since Trump announced sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs on April 2, 2025, invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act through an executive order. These expanded on the tariffs he had previously imposed without Congressional oversight.

We Pay the Tariffs, which includes more than a dozen signatories in the Houston area, puts the direct cost of these tariffs in the range of a a quarter-trillion dollars over the past year.

Between March 2025 and January of this year, according to the group’s analysis, businesses across the United States paid $246 billion in “presidential tariffs” — the tariffs Trump imposed, using various mechanisms, during his first and second terms as president.

About $26 billion of the nationwide total was paid by Texas businesses such as Houghton Horns, according to We Pay the Tariffs, including $13 billion in IEEPA tariffs specifically.

1. Kudos to We Pay The Tariffs for getting this message out in a timely fashion. It may be hard to remember now, what with all of the ICE atrocities and DOGE rampages and threats to democracy and five-hour TSA lines and wars nobody asked for, but the tariffs did a lot of damage early on not just to the economy but also to our relations with allies and trading partners. The whole “flood the zone with bullshit” strategy that the Trump regime and its enablers employ is there in part to make us all forget about the terrible things they’ve done in the past – and by “past”, I mean starting with yesterday – so it’s on us to periodically remind ourselves and others what we’ve been through.

2. There have of course been complaints from the beginning about the tariffs and the expense they have levied on businesses and consumers. A lot of those complaints have come from various business groups and farmers, and a lot of those making the complaints are Trump supporters. Not all of them, and some of them have expressed regret for their vote, but a significant number of them brought this on themselves. Any reported article that includes a quote from a tariff critic that doesn’t include an explanation about who that critic voted for in 2024, and how they feel about it now, is doing you a disservice. Let the Kamala voters say their “I told you so”s. Let the sorrowful erstwhile Trump voters give their mea culpas. And let the dead enders show themselves so we can mock them forevermore.

3. Putting those first two items together, the tariffs should still be a significant part of the 2026 election playbook. They contributed to inflation! They were unilaterally imposed by a President who didn’t have the power to do so! And all of the sycophantic Republican officeholders who blindly support Donald Trump will defend them, because they’re too cowardly to ever cross His Highness. Don’t let them off the hook.

Posted in Bidness | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Using AI to ban books

And also to review books that have been challenged. The AI vendors want a piece of the action either way.

Conservative parents’ advocacy groups have been experimenting with using commercially available artificial intelligence tools to help them flag more books they’ve deemed pornographic to be removed from public schools and libraries. Even though LLMs are notoriously error-prone, and the books in question aren’t pornographic, these groups continue to explore use cases for AI anyway.

One such experiment indicates a desire to accelerate content production of book reviews for conservative book-rating sites. BLOCKADE, which stands for “Blocking Lustful Overzealous Content, Keeping Away Depravity and Extremism,” relies on xAI or OpenAI API keys to generate book reports from PDF/ePUB files, basing the analysis on a set of parameters that are publicly available through the creator’s Github page.

The program’s script includes a list of roughly 300 words, each assigned a severity score that contributes to an overall appropriateness score based on their own metrics. The script explicitly defines “educational inappropriateness” as “content offensive to conservative values,” while also asking the AI “not to include any additional text or explanation” for its decisions.

If you want to classify content in this kind of context, maybe toxicity with offensive content, troublesome content—whoever it is it finds troublesome—asking for an explanation is super useful,” Jeremy Blackburn, associate professor of computer science and director of the Institute for AI and Society at Binghamton University, told 404 Media.

Blackburn notes that there’s a lot of control relinquished to a chatbot as to what the definition of pornography or conservative values is. The definition is whatever the AI model has defined it as.

“There’s just a lot of responsibility being abdicated,” he added. “If you’re abdicating the responsibility with this kind of not sophisticated prompting strategy with no real thought into how to evaluate what comes out of these models.”

Intellectual freedom advocates are alarmed by the frequency in which censors rely on AI to help them determine what books to remove from public spaces. When BLOCKADE is finished interpreting conservative values to mean whatever xAI or OpenAI’s LLMs say they mean, it builds a risk profile for the book that the user can then export as a PDF that looks a lot like the book reviews organizations like Moms for Liberty popularized before AI chatbots were on the market. The format has inspired numerous copycats from organizations that take the idea a step further, using heat maps to monitor books they don’t like that remain available in school libraries by aggregating data by state, district, school building and the number of books in circulation. In other instances, activists use social media channels to highlight their experiments with using AI chatbots to challenge passages for possible violations of state laws.

In every case, these reviews are designed to be submitted as attachments to formal book challenges to districts, fueling the removal of totally normal books from schools nationwide, and shouldn’t be confused with those from publishing industry professionals. They also disproportionately target titles that feature historically underrepresented—and often misrepresented—characters and voices that grapple with big ideas like consent, prejudice and free will, which are important issues for young people to reckon with. Often, these reviews are used to justify formal challenges to their availability in school classrooms and libraries and as a tool to falsely accuse school staff of egregious misconduct. Increasingly, these reviews are—to some extent—informed by AI outputs.

Kasey Meehan, director of PEN America’s Freedom to Read program notes that the practice of stripping books of their context didn’t start with AI. Early efforts to legitimize review platforms relied on keyword tallies to justify arbitrary numeric scores, stripping passages and illustrations of their context and ignoring the wholeness of books.

“When [censors] start using these tools to take the shortcut to get books off shelves, you’re going to end up pulling so many books that tend to be the most targeted anyway,” Meehan told 404 Media.

Rated Books, which hosts all of the book reports Moms for Liberty members produced before winding down last year, is behind one of the more aggressive campaigns to get “sacrilegious” content out of schools. The site is run by Brooke Stephens, a Utah-based activist who has spent months chronicling her experiments with commercial AI tools for the LaVerna in the Library – Utah’s Mary in the Library Facebook group. This Facebook group, which operates like a support group for the most proficient book banners in America, has been a testing ground for how well AI can effectively interpret state laws that restrict young people’s access to books. Using Utah’s “bright-line” rule—a legal standard applied to schools through House Bill 29—certain depictions of sexual conduct are considered “harmful to minors” and thus contain no “serious value” regardless of their literary merit—Rated Books reviewers ask different AI models if the passages they don’t like violate the legal standard.

[…]

This month, the National Book Rating Index—a Rated Books affiliate project—began selling users access to NarraTrue, an AI content scanner that promises to scan books for potentially sensitive materials. According to the product’s description, a $5 payment will net purchasers a CSV file with specific page numbers and verbatim excerpts. While only a few AI content scans have been made public, access to the product is now included among lists of other likeminded book reviews.

In other parts of the country, the ability to mass-produce content to challenge books in schools is fueling an emerging market where organizations sell “solutions” to the very school districts the “parental rights” movement overwhelmed has enabled these tools to take off more vapidly. The Texas company BookmarkED is selling its AI content scanner to districts as a solution to legal liability problems.

Public records obtained by 404 Media from the New Braunfels Independent School District northeast of San Antonio show the district has heavily invested in AI to screen books for content that would violate one of the state’s numerous book ban laws, particularly SB 12 and SB 13.

Emails from the company to the district include phrases like, “the real power of your OnShelf dashboard isn’t just the list of books; it’s the book intelligence behind that list,” before promising to give customers a “truly defensible process” that “allows you to build a review process you can stand behind” and promises more context for what the AI flags and why. This includes AI content analysis, live landscape monitoring of what the public and activist groups are saying about the book and whether other districts have retained or removed certain books.

In a Nov. 18, 2025 email exchange, NBISD employees were candid about the product’s efficacy.

“I feel like BookmarkED is flagging more each time you run it,” a NBISD elementary school librarian wrote. “We have said that all books we are reviewing will need to have the things that were flagged pervasively throughout the book taken as a whole. Based on the comments from the AI, it seems that if it has any content at all, it flags rather than taking it as a whole. But I couldn’t tell you for sure.”

Meehan says districts should be wary of the rent-seeking motives baked into these AI platforms, if not for the “grifty” energy these companies give off, then for the local decision-making power that’s being abdicated to Silicon Valley.

“Your state passes harmful legislation that removes and censors books, and then you have companies appear that then want to charge districts to review their collections,” Meehan said.

Despite fast-tracking a nearly $9,000 contract with BookmarkED, the district maintains that it’s still in the “exploring process.”

According to the Texas Freedom to Read Project, NBISD has removed more than 1,400 books from its elementary, middle and high schools to comply with new laws while the ability to purchase new books is suspended indefinitely.

“All of this is not real—it’s manufactured,” Laney Hawes, a volunteer with the Texas Freedom to Read Project told 404 Media. “It’s not a real problem because if it was a real problem, our children wouldn’t all have phones in their pockets and Chromebooks in their backpacks… Your child can Google it and find a live reading and enactment of the same book on YouTube or their school-issued Chromebook.”

See here for a bit of background. As I said in that post, the original sin here is the terrible legislation passed by Republicans that allow for such onerous censorship. The technology that lets a small number of dedicated self-appointed moralizers scale up their denial-of-service attacks is a problem, but a downstream problem. They need to be regulated, but any Congress or Legislature that’s in a position to do that is also in a position to repeal the book-ban-enabling laws. There’s a lot of work to be done.

(And you should totally sign up for 404 Media‘s newsletter, and consider subscribing to their service.)

Posted in School days, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekend link dump for April 5

“Pilates has grown in popularity in recent years, fueled in part by social media. This dig at the exercise routine of Draper, the “Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” cast member, has much deeper misogynist roots than simply criticizing her appearance: It serves as shorthand for both a set of instructions and expectations for how a “good” and desirable woman should be.”

“While I don’t think this one artist’s decision to stick it to Spotify signals a paradigm shift for a broken industry, it does feel like yet another reminder of something I’ve seen flourishing over the past few months: a genuine hunger from fans to invest in physical media at a time when the streaming and forever-online model of distribution has become increasingly exploitative.”

“Researchers have identified 24 new deep-sea creatures and a whole new evolutionary branch in the Clarion Clipperton Zone (CCZ), a wide swath of ocean between Hawaii and Mexico. The findings surface as the Trump administration, via a January mandate from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, has fast-tracked permits for deep sea mining in that zone, one of the planet’s richest rare-earth metal regions.”

“Brothers and sisters, this is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war. He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them.”

“The case isn’t really about anything more than that. The underlying issue is simply the lack of submission. And the point is not to win. The point is to emphasize to the next recalcitrant entity, person, company, or institution that it will have to defend itself if it asserts its rights—because the government will relentlessly come at those who don’t submit. It will come at the little guy. It will come just as relentlessly at the multibillion dollar corporation or the university with the endowment the size of the GDP of a small country. If you’re the little guy, they will keep coming until some court lets them send you to Liberia. And if you’re a frontier AI company with the temerity not to submit, they will use the opportunity of destroying you to create opportunities for businesses associated with friendlier billionaires who know to stay on side.”

“Fiber optic cables reveal a serious problem at the heart of modern farming”.

“The streaming services, to me, are minutes away from being obsolete.”

RIP, Mary Beth Hurt, three-time Tony-nominated actor who was also in movies such as The World According to Garp.

RIP, Ben Stevenson, ballet dancer, choreographer, longtime artistic director of Texas Ballet Theater, named Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) by Queen Elizabeth II in 1999.

RIP, James Tolkan, versatile actor known for Top Gun, the Back to the Future trilogy, and many more movies.

RIP, Robert Hinkle, stunt performer and dialog coach who among many other things taught Rock Hudson and Paul Newman how to talk like Texans for the movie Giant.

“Some Declaration of Independence Charges Against King George Apply to Wannabe King Donald Trump”.

“Those are words. They are mostly recognizable English words that I, as an English-speaker, mostly understand. And if I wrestle with that paragraph long enough, I can eventually discern the intended meaning of those words which seems to be, ironically, that the people writing them are available for hire as communications specialists.”

“Detractors are taking Lindy West’s memoir as the last nail in millennial feminism’s coffin. We should be grieving its loss.”

“What It’s Like to Be a Nonbinary Educator in Texas Right Now”. Full disclosure, I’m acquainted with Indigo, the educator in question. Their parents are friends of mine.

“Our new political world in the U.S. and around much of the globe is no longer simply right vs. left but authoritarian vs. civic democratic. And those two poles involved not just different policy positions but different ideational systems, different ways of thinking about research, facts, power and more. Journalism as most of us understand it, the way most journalists understand it, is inextricably located in the civic democratic space, though it isn’t inherently liberal in the old sense of the word. Without knowing that basic fact, you can’t understand much of anything about contemporary politics and journalism and the big fights about our future that we are all, intentionally or not, involved in today.” I agree in full with this article, but I feel compelled to point out that it represents David Broder erasure. How quickly we forget.

“As the surge in Minneapolis winds down, small communities in Minnesota (like Willmar) fend off more arrests and lasting impacts.”

Two words: Bryon Noem. Like, dude.

“Trump’s Justice Department Dropped 23,000 Criminal Investigations in Shift to Immigration”. Not only are they not going after undocumented immigrants with criminal histories, they’ve stopped going after real criminals to go after non-criminal immigrants. I feel so much safer now.

RIP, Sugar The Surfing Dog, the first canine inducted into the Surfer’s Hall of Fame.

Here is an unflattering photo of Karoline Leavitt that you should not look at and definitely should not share.

“Data shared earlier this week by U.S. Customs and Border Protection suggests the smallest and most vulnerable importers are being left behind in the early stages of the tariff refund process.”

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 1 Comment

It will be Panzarella versus Hellyar in District C

The headline of the Chron story on the District C election results amuses me: “Race for Houston’s District C council seat appears headed to runoff; Panzarella, Hellyar lead”. I mean, of course it’s going to a runoff. There were seven candidates, and none of them had the kind of significant advantage that one needs to have to get a clear majority of the vote in a seven-candidate race. The only question was who would be in the runoff.

I could have made a case for just about anyone in the race, but in the end Joe Panzarella, who I’m going to guess got at least a bit of a boost from the Chronicle endorsement, was the clear frontrunner. As of about 10 PM, with 17 of 20 vote centers reporting, he had 33.51% of the vote. Nick Hellyar was next with 22.41%, with Audrey Nath falling just short at 19.83%, which in this context represented 234 votes. She was slightly ahead of Hellyar in Election Day voting, but would have to dominate by a margin that I’m pretty sure is unattainable to close that gap. Patrick Oathout was fourth at 12.82%, with Angelica Luna Kaufman, Laura Gallier, and Sophia Campos following. Turnout will very likely fall short of the top tier, as there were just over 9K total votes cast at this point and something close to 11K would be needed to get to seven percent. I’ll update with a more accurate total in the morning.

For what it’s worth, I saw two friends post on Facebook on Saturday asking for advice about who to vote for, while a third one called me to ask my opinion. Amusingly, one of the friends who sought guidance on Facebook had received six comments when I saw the post, two each for Panzarella, Nath, and Oathout. It may be that the larger lineup of broadly acceptable choices held some people back; if so, we may see more engagement in the runoff. Which as noted will fall between the May 2 uniform election (in which no one in District C will participate) and the primary runoff (in which likely a decent amount will). Who knows what effect that will have. Anyway, congrats to Panzarella and Hellyar, and thank you to everyone else. See you in the runoff.

UPDATE: Final tally is in, turnout was 5.57%, which is below the top tier but not far off from it. This is how it is in special elections, especially in weird months.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment