Federal grant to Amtrak for Texas high speed rail planning rescinded

My reaction to this was “bad”, but I might be wrong.

President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday terminated a federal grant to help fund a long-sought high-speed rail line between Dallas and Houston — saying that if the embattled project moves forward, it will have to do so without federal help at this stage.

The U.S. Department of Transportation nixed a $63.9 million planning grant for the proposed Texas Central route under an agreement between the Federal Railroad Administration and Amtrak. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the two agencies “are in agreement that underwriting this project is a waste of taxpayer funds and a distraction from Amtrak’s core mission of improving its existing subpar services.”

“The Texas Central Railway project was proposed as a private venture,” Duffy said. “If the private sector believes this project is feasible, they should carry the pre-construction work forward, rather than relying on Amtrak and the American taxpayer to bail them out.”

Kleinheinz Capital Partners, the lead investor in Texas Central, said Monday’s announcement is “good news for the overall project.”

“We agree with Secretary Duffy that this project should be led by the private sector, and we will be proud to take it forward,” the company said in a statement. “This project is shovel-ready and will create significant new jobs and economic growth for Texas as part of President Trump’s efforts to boost the U.S. economy.”

[…]

Texas Central had shown signs of life in recent years when Amtrak revived the project following a leadership exodus.

The company bought its Japanese investors out of the project in January, Andy Jent, a Texas Central representative, told state lawmakers in March. Fort Worth investor John Kleinheinz is now the lead investor in the project, Jent said. Texas Central has acquired about 25% of the parcels needed to build the route, he said.

Peter LeCody, who heads the organization Texas Rail Advocates, was optimistic that the project would move forward despite the lost federal funds.

“Can the private sector do this? Probably,” LeCody said. “Will it need help from any other source? Maybe.”

See here for the previous update. Kleinheinz Capital’s reaction makes me gag – and I have to admit, that’s a new name to me – but whatever. Finance bros gonna finance bro. If this doesn’t derail things – yeah, I said it – then I don’t care if they kiss Trump’s ass. We’ll see if they can live up to their words. The Chron and the Fort Worth Report, which has more on Kleinhenz Capital, have more.

UPDATE: Those Kleinheinz Capital guys sure are sure of themselves.

Texans could ride high-speed rail from Houston to Dallas as soon as 2032.

The new investors behind Texas Central offered that positive outlook to state lawmakers on Thursday, saying the beleaguered bullet train is still viable and shovel-ready even after the Trump administration pulled a $64 million grant this week and cancelled a partnership with Amtrak.

John Kleinheinz, the CEO of Fort-Worth based Kleinheinz Capital Partners that recently assumed a controlling interest in the project, cast the latest developments as a good thing.

“Amtrak has been trying to get control of our deal and it would have been terrible for Texas,” Kleinheinz said in an interview. “ It would’ve been terrible for us because government procurement rules make it so expensive to do a project like this.”

Kleinheinz said he believes the Trump administration is “interested in this deal” if it comes from the private sector.

On Wednesday, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy appeared to agree.

“I love high-speed rail,” he told Fox News. “Let’s try to find projects in America where we can build high-speed rail but do it efficiently and bring in the private sector to make those investments, not the taxpayer.”

[…]

Peter LeCody, the president of Texas Rail Advocates, a nonprofit dedicated to developing rail service across the state, said Kleinheinz’s involvement puts “the high-speed rail project back in the game again. They’re down to the 10-yard line.”

The last play of that game, LeCody said, is securing financing for the project — last estimated at $30 billion — and getting final approval from the federal Surface Transportation Board. The project already has completed a full environmental review, required by federal law.

Kleinheinz said he intended to follow in the model of Brightline, a private company that recently launched a high-speed rail line between Miami and Orlando and is pursuing a second project between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. The Florida project was largely funded through private investments.

Texas Central owns about 25% of the right-of-way needed to construct the project. Kleinheinz said eminent domain would be required for only “four or five percent” of the land that still needs to be acquired.

“Seventy percent of this route is underneath high voltage utility lines,” he said. “People don’t live underneath high-voltage utility lines.”

[…]

On Thursday, state Rep. Dennis Paul, a Houston Republican, asked Andy Jent, an investment adviser at the firm, if the project had a schedule. Jent said the company wasn’t ready “to say go,” but when it did, he anticipated six months to finalize planning and secure financing, and another 80 to 86 months — roughly seven years — for construction.

There was a time when this kind of confident talk would have thrilled me. Now, let’s just say I’m a bit more circumspect. Let’s see where they are in that six month time frame for planning and funding.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Federal grant to Amtrak for Texas high speed rail planning rescinded

Dispatches from Dallas, April 19 edition

This is a weekly feature produced by my friend Ginger. Let us know what you think.

This week, in news from Dallas-Fort Worth, we have measles, but not an epidemic (yet); new police and fire chiefs in Dallas; Ken Paxton suing Dallas over guns at the State Fair; the Dallas planning department losing $8.6 million; more on Tarrant County redistricting; the Ten Commandments coming to the Tarrant County Courthouse (with a bonus wish from Bo French); the DMN owning up to missing an important story; the Mavs ownership trying to sell the media and the fans on the new post-Luka team; the Wings getting a superstar in the WNBA draft; a great April Fools’ prank from 1986; and the best and worst BBQ in the Metroplex. And more!

This week’s post was brought to you by the music of cellist Julia Kent.

We haven’t had measles in the Metroplex break out widely, yet, but it’s clearly only a matter of time. We had a possible exposure in Grapevine a couple of weeks ago; this week we have a report of a case in Rockwall County after the patient had traveled to West Texas; we have another potential set of exposures in three strip malls in Plano. There’s also all sorts of gossip about potential exposures that haven’t been substantiated; friends of mine in Plano got their MMR updates after reading about a rumored ER closure on Reddit.

Statewide we’re at almost 600 confirmed cases. And in case you didn’t know, the long-term results of measles are gruesome, including brain swelling, hearing loss, and “immune amnesia”, which is when you lose all your immunity to diseases you’ve had and/or been vaccinated against. There is no cure for measles, but you can keep from getting it with a single shot. Y’all reading this almost certainly have already done this yourselves, but if you have friends and family who aren’t vaccinated, or are in the age group that may have to revaccinate, get them to the pharmacy to update their MMRs. Shots are no fun, but measles can kill you.

Meanwhile, in other news:

  • Dallas has a sort-of-new fire chief: interim chief Justin Ball got the nod. The DMN will tell you five things you need to know about him, including that he’s an immigrant from the UK.
  • Dallas also has an actually new police chief: Daniel Comeaux won the five-way contest for the DPD job. The DMN will also tell you five things you need to know about him, including that he spent most of his career in Houston. Interim Chief Michael Igo, who was also on the short list, retired after Comeaux’s selection was announced.
  • Speaking of DPD, the training center controversy continues. The Dallas Observer has a timeline to help you figure it out; D Magazine and KERA have the latest. Part of the problem is that the police academy will need areas for firearm and driving lessons that shouldn’t be on the UT Dallas campus where the rest of the academy will be. But those facilities will run up the cost.
  • In a fourth departure, the head of Dallas’ civil pensions is retiring after 20 years.
  • You knew it was coming, and here it is: Ken Paxton is suing Dallas over gun restrictions at Fair Park, the Music Hall, and the Majestic Theatre. As mentioned in the article, there are already bills out there to keep Fair Park from restricting guns at the Fair. As a visitor to all three venues, where drinks are served, I don’t want gun gropers waving their weapons around. But that’s common sense, which has nothing to do with the red meat Ken Paxton is throwing to the base in preparation for his Senate primary next spring.
  • The Dallas planning department has screwed up a lot in the last few years. Another error has just come out: a consultant screwed up the formula for a hike in fees. Instead of hiking fees, the new fees were lower, to the tune of $8.6 million since May 2024. The linked DMN story and this item at local real estate site Candy’s Dirt show just how bad things have gotten for Dallas’ planning crew.
  • The Dallas Observer would like to tell you which Dallas neighborhoods have the biggest increase in housing costs. My zip code, which is zoned to Richardson ISD schools, is just behind Preston Hollow in terms of rising costs. I just got my tax bill from Dallas County and they know all about the increase in prices around here. Ouch.
  • RIP Edna Pemberton, known as Mrs. P, a South Dallas civic leader. Among her long list of achievements is helping more than 80,000 refugees after Hurricane Katrina.
  • In 2019, not long after I moved here, the Texas Department of Transportation decided to build the “I-30 canyon” to bury the part of I-30 between I-35 and I-45 and let southern Dallas link up to downtown. Since the project was announced, its estimated cost has tripled to $890 million. Most recently the estimate has jumped by another $196 million, split three ways between the North Central Texas Council of Governments’ Regional Transportation Council and TxDOT. Every one of these deck projects is expected to turn out like Klyde Warren Park, and that’s not realistic. Klyde Warren has significant community support and oil money to buy facilities, plus it’s in the Arts District. That’s not the case for that section of I-30.
  • I always report these cases for Tarrant County and Fort Worth, so here’s one for Dallas: City Council approved $65,000 to pay off a man who was beaten by a DPD officer who was later sacked. The officer in question had two use-of-force complaints before he was caught on camera punching this man in the face.
  • Dallas County has a new pollbook provider for the May election and they tested the new software on Friday. Fingers crossed that next week I can report on a successful test. The new vendor is KNOWiNK, LLC; the old vendor, Election Systems and Services, was decertified after problems with the November election.
  • Dallas County is above state and national averages for food insecurity, aka hunger. A quarter of kids in Dallas were food-insecure in 2022. Black and Latino folks are more than twice as likely to be food-insecure as white folks. And that’s without recent cuts to federal money.
  • There’s more on Tim O’Hare’s effort to redistrict Tarrant County in the middle of the decade. KERA has some information about the rules for mid-decade redistricting, which the article correctly describes as a political process. The Star-Telegram also has an analysis of the issues and an editorial from the paper against redistricting, which I was surprised but pleased to see. I don’t think anything like public opinion will stop Tim O’Hare and Manny Ramirez from picking their voters if they can, but it’s nice to see someone saying they shouldn’t.
  • Meanwhile there are also some change to precincts in Tarrant County for the upcoming May election required under state law. They won’t change the ballots, though.
  • The latest from the Tarrant County Jail is fortunately not another report of a death. Instead they’re trying to develop a compassionate release policy. There’s currently an inmate with terminal stomach cancer and if he’s not released, he’ll be another in-custody death.
  • The Ten Commandments are coming to Tarrant County: a nonprofit is donating a monument almost identical to the one on the grounds of the Capitol in Austin and Commissioner’s Court voted to accept the gift. I’m never thrilled to see religious statuary on public grounds, but the real corker is what Tarrant County GOP leader posted on Xitter afterwards, screencapped by local journalist Steven Monacelli: Next can we put a gallows up?. Classy.
  • Ken Paxton’s investigation into Dallas ISD over their trans student athletes policy is unsurprisingly ending with a whimper instead of a bang. DISD says they’ll follow the law, they’re putting out a memo, and whoever it was that said you could get a birth certificate changed out of state is gone. More red meat for the upcoming Senate primary.
  • Speaking of red meat for the base, as one does when mentioning something Ken Paxton does, both Paxton and Senator John Cornyn are now investigating EPIC City, the Muslim-led development in Collin County. While there are a bunch of stories in local news about it, they all amount to the same thing: the usual suspects have their underwear in a knot because Muslims are doing something the same people support when Christians do it. The New York Times has picked up Governor Abbott’s crusade against EPIC City but haven’t picked up on the part our Senator and Attorney General are now playing in fanning the fire.
  • You may recall that I’ve talked about the good work of Dallas attorney Mark Melton in preventing landlords from evicting renters without legal representation. Texas Monthly talked to Melton about HB 32, the “anti-squatters” bill that passed the Texas Senate last week. The powers that be are going to keep Melton and his allies from representing people at eviction hearings by removing the hearing requirement. You know what to do: call your reps.
  • Let’s talk about regional transit in North Texas. As I’ve mentioned several times, a number of cities in the Metroplex are annoyed they have to pay money to DART. So the Regional Transportation Council wants to make a new plan which sounds like they’re going to vamp until the next decision point. Meanwhile, the Trump administration pulled the grant for high-speed rail between Dallas and Houston; the loss of funds might also kill the Dallas-Fort Worth high-speed train. The Texas Tribune has more on the Dallas-Houston funding cut and efforts in the Lege to kill the whole project.
  • The Latter Day Saints are heading back to Fairview with a proposal for a smaller temple instead of a lawsuit.
  • You may recall that we had big “Hands Off” protests across the country on April 5. The Dallas Morning News completely failed to cover them. The Public Editor of the paper answers for their failure and talks about how that screw-up happened. What I get from this is, first, they didn’t think protest against the Trump administration would be important to cover. Second, I notice they answer when former Mayor Laura Miller tells them to get their act together. There are more protests on April 19, and maybe the DMN will cover them.
  • Why is it that when we find election shenanigans, it’s Republicans? Out in Hood County, a former Granbury city council candidate was arrested for election fraud and perjury of certain election procedures (the latter of which is a state jail felony) for lying about her address. The candidate is also a Hood County GOP official.
  • As our host noted, self-driving semis are coming to I-45 between Dallas and Houston. I’m less sanguine than our host about the near-term arrival of these trucks, if only because the Trump administration tariffs are about to upend our trucking industry in a bad way.
  • Unsurprisingly, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and Southwestern Health Resources signed a three-year contract four days after the previous contract expired, accomplishing nothing but upsetting their joint customer base. The DMN has the story of one patient who would have been really screwed if he had to find new doctors on short notice: a young heart patient who’d had emergency surgery at a Texas Health hospital. Imagine that scare multiplied by everyone on those plans, including the half-million educators on the Teacher Retirement System of Texas’ self funded plans.
  • I mention this DMN article on the upcoming Republican Senate primary because they name my House Rep, Beth Van Duyne, as a potential wild card. I can’t say anything about the other two potential spoilers, but I think if Van Duyne runs, she’s just raising her profile statewide. She has nothing to offer than Cornyn and Paxton don’t also have except being a woman, which is not a benefit in Republican politics.
  • Marc Veasey’s quest to get answers from ICE about that white supremacist prosecutor the Texas Observer found gets some coverage in Salon. I wish him all the luck in the world but they’re going to continue to stonewall him.
  • Former Dallas HERO frontman Pete Marocco is out at the State Department, having destroyed USAID. He’s a bad penny who’ll turn up somewhere; I hope it’s not here in Dallas again.
  • Wondering who’s behind the upcoming Texas Stock Exchange, which is expected to launch next year? Per SEC filings, the majority owner is local oilman Kelcy Warren.
  • This week there was an exclusive Dallas Mavericks media roundtable and D Magazine’s representative has all the details. It sounds awful: awfully hilarious if you’re not a Mavericks fan, and awfully painful if you used to be. It’s clear the Sands people think the fans need to get over Luka. It’s also clear the fans want the head of GM Nico Harrison and will be satisfied with nothing less. The Sands people also want to take the Mavs to Irving, but pissing off the Dallas fans so bad they don’t care if the Mavs leave isn’t the best way to go about it.
  • In happier sports news, the Dallas Wings, our local WNBA team, got first pick in the draft and picked up superstar Paige Bueckers. The DMN has ten things you should know about her. I’m excited and am looking forward to attending a Wings game to watch her play. Also, based on this Go Fug Yourself slideshow, the WNBA’s new players, including Paige, are stylin’.
  • Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson visited a north Texas wildlife safari park, the kind where you drive through with your windows open, with his family recently and got himself pecked by an ostrich. There’s video. Couldn’t have happened to a nicer, though I’m glad the toddler in the video didn’t get pecked as well.
  • This story about D Magazine’s April Fools 1986 story about Madonna moving to Dallas and the prank that supported it gave me a laugh.
  • The historic Oakland Cemetery in South Dallas has been cleaned up and given a historical marker.
  • Fort Worth has named a new housing complex with more than half of its 338 units reserved for affordable residences after Grandmother of Juneteenth Opal Lee.
  • D Magazine has written up its top 50 BBQ joints in North Texas. My neighborhood favorite, One90, got an honorable mention! But it’s the story about the worst BBQ that was really worth reading.
Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Dispatches from Dallas, April 19 edition

House passes Abbott’s voucher bill

Welp.

The Texas House gave initial approval early Thursday to a bill that would create a $1 billion private school voucher program, crossing a historic milestone and bringing Gov. Greg Abbott’s top legislative priority closer than ever to reaching his desk.

The lower chamber signed off on its voucher proposal, Senate Bill 2, on an 85-63 vote. Every present Democrat voted against the bill. They were joined by two Republicans — far short of the bipartisan coalitions that in previous legislative sessions consistently blocked proposals to let Texans use taxpayer money to pay for their children’s private schooling.

“This is an extraordinary victory for the thousands of parents who have advocated for more choices when it comes to the education of their children,” Abbott said in a statement, vowing that he would “swiftly sign this bill into law” when it reached his desk.

The vote came more than 10 hours after the chamber gave preliminary approval to its sweeping $7.7 billion school funding package, which would give local districts more money per student and raise teacher salaries. House Bill 2, which passed on a 144-4 vote, also aims to improve the quality of special education services by allocating funding based on the individual needs of children with disabilities.

Democrats argued the funding boost barely scratches the surface of what districts need to come back from budget deficits or to cover growing costs after years of inflation, but they ultimately supported the bill after a few hours of debate.

The more dramatic showdown came over the voucher bill, which Democrats tried to thwart with an amendment that would have put school vouchers up for a statewide vote in November. But the last-ditch maneuver attracted support from only one Republican — Rep. Dade Phelan of Beaumont, the former House speaker — spelling the demise of Democrats’ one major play to derail the bill.

The landmark voucher vote marks the first time since 1957 that the Texas House has approved legislation making state money available for families to use on their children’s private schooling. The outcome validated Abbott’s crusade to build a pro-voucher House majority during last year’s primary by targeting Republicans who tanked his previous proposal in 2023. Now, all that is left is for Republicans in both chambers to iron out the differences between their voucher plans, leaving Abbott and his allies on the brink of victory.

The House’s plan would put $1 billion to create education savings accounts, a form of vouchers that families could use to pay for private school tuition and other school-related expenses, like textbooks, transportation and therapy. The bill would tie the voucher program’s per-student dollars to public education funding so the amount available to each participating student would increase when public schools receive more money and dip when public education funding declines.

[…]

​The House also gave initial approval to its priority school funding legislation. Two years ago, public schools missed out on nearly $8 billion, which Abbott had made conditional on the approval of vouchers.

This year’s public education spending bill would increase schools’ base funding by $395 — from $6,160 to $6,555. That amount, known as the basic allotment, would automatically go up every two years by tying it to property value growth. Forty percent of the allotment would go to non-administrative staff salaries, with higher pay increases reserved for teachers with more than a decade of classroom experience.

In addition, the bill would limit schools’ use of educators who lack formal classroom training, barring uncertified teachers from instructing core classes. It would change the current settings-based model for special education funding by providing schools money based on the individual needs of students with disabilities. Two students placed in the same classroom but who require different levels of support receive the same dollars under the current settings-based model.

Republicans, during hours of debate, celebrated the bill as a worthwhile investment in public education. Democrats also voiced support for the legislation but argued that it barely scratches the surface of what districts need. Many school districts are currently grappling with challenges ranging from budget deficits and teacher shortages to campus closures.

Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin, pressed Buckley, the bill’s author, on whether the measure’s $8 billion would be enough to solve Texas schools’ struggles, which have been fueled by stagnant funding and inflation.

Buckley did not directly acknowledge that his bill would fall short of addressing all the financial pressures facing districts. He instead focused on the multibillion-dollar funding boost the Legislature hopes to provide this session, which includes money through HB 2 and other legislation under consideration.

“I just want to emphasize, members, you have an opportunity today to cast a vote for the largest investment in public education in the history of our state, and so we will continue this process as this body returns session after session to make sure the resources are there for our schools,” Buckley said.

Members of the public viewing the debate from the House gallery erupted in laughter and applause in support of Talarico’s questioning. Talarico and those in the gallery did not appear content with Buckley’s answers.

“I’m going to take that as a no until I get a yes,” Talarico said.

Given the outcome of the 2024 Republican primaries, not to mention the November general election, this was to be expected. Amazing what can be done when you win more elections. I stand by my recommendation that Dems make tariff chaos the main point of the 2026 elections, but we can include the message that private school vouchers, Greg Abbott’s top priority, won’t do a damn thing to help just about anyone.

With vouchers and the budget mostly done, we’ll probably start seeing more bills come up for a vote. That will also be bad, it’s mostly a question of how bad. Will Dems hold the line on those constitutional amendments? I sure hope so. They’ve done a good job fighting so far, it would be dispiriting to see them fall apart after that bitter but expected defeat. The Chron, the Texas Signal, and The Barbed Wire have more.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on House passes Abbott’s voucher bill

Taral Patel takes a plea

Interesting.

Taral Patel, a former Fort Bend County staffer and commissioner candidate, pleaded guilty Tuesday to two misdemeanor charges after he was accused of creating fake social media profiles to post racist messages about himself, according to the Fort Bend County District Attorney’s Office.

Patel also admitted in his plea deal to committing one of the misdemeanors along with Fort Bend County Judge KP George. George is accused of working alongside Patel to sway the outcome of an election. He is also accused of money laundering an amount of more than $30,000 but less than $150,000.

Patel agreed to a two-year deferred adjudication probation on the misdemeanors, which includes a “litany of conditions,” a statement from the district attorney’s office said.

The agreement requires Patel to complete 200 hours of community service, have no contact with the victims or contact with the elected officials he maligned, and to write letters of apology to each victim and the Fort Bend community at large.

Patel also promised to cooperate in any future legal proceedings. In exchange for his plea, the remaining misdemeanor charges were dismissed.

Patel was indicted in September on four felony counts of online impersonation with intent to injure a candidate, court documents show. He was also indicted on misdemeanor charges of online impersonation and harassment for a total of nine charges.

[…]

“Justice and accountability were achieved today when Taral Patel accepted responsibility and pled guilty to the offenses,” said District Attorney Brian Middleton in a statement. “We believe the terms of the plea bargain are fair for the community and for the defendant. Now we can all move forward.”

See here for some background. That mention of Judge KP George and the agreement by Patel to cooperate in any future proceedings is a clear message to Judge George, and he responded to it.

George’s lawyer, Jared Woodfill, released a statement Wednesday disputing Patel’s claim. Woodfill blasted Fort Bend County District Attorney Brian Middleton for “cutting backroom deals” and using Patel as a “pawn.”

“Mr. Patel’s plea agreement, which is a mere slap on the wrist, appears to be the DA’s effort to further manufacture a case against George cutting backroom deals in exchange for testimony,” the statement said. “The case is about DA Middleton capturing the news headlines in an effort to influence an election in his favor.”

Patel was indicted in September on four felony counts of online impersonation with intent to injure a candidate, court documents show. He was also indicted on misdemeanor charges of online impersonation and harassment for a total of nine charges.

Patel in court documents admitted that he “freely and voluntarily confess that I did commit the offense of misrepresentation of identity/candidate in Fort Bend County on or about 9/26/22 along with Kyle Prasad George.”

See here and here for some more background. And all I can say right now is wait a damn minute, he’s being represented by Jared fucking Woodfill? Dude, could you not find a more respectable lawyer than that? Oh my God. I’m going to go sit down for a minute. Talk among yourselves.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Taral Patel takes a plea

Carbon capture permit granted

Of interest.

The Environmental Protection Agency has approved a Texas company’s application to capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and inject it underground, becoming the first project in the state to be awarded such a permit.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation, a Houston-based oil firm, will start storing 500,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide in deep, non-permeable rock formations 4,400 feet underground as soon as this year. The facility will be located 20 miles southwest of Odessa.

“This is a significant milestone for the company as we are continuing to develop vital infrastructure that will help the United States achieve energy security,” Vicky Hollub, the company’s president and CEO, said in a statement. She said these permits will help energy companies “address their emissions or produce vital resources and fuels.”

Carbon dioxide is a byproduct of oil and gas production and the largest contributor to climate change. Oil and gas facilities leak or vent the greenhouse gas, which traps heat in the atmosphere and prevents it from cooling. Environmentalists and the oil and gas industry are divided over the environmental benefits of carbon capture.

While the industry has hedged its climate goals on the technology, environmental policy experts remain skeptical about whether it significantly reduces air pollution, saying the world should transition to other fuel sources to slow climate change. Some Texas scientists say the injection method has been tested and proven to work for years and now needs to be implemented.

[…]

Virginia Palacios, executive director of Commission Shift, an oil and gas watchdog group, said Oxy’s permit application did not include details regarding the layers where the carbon dioxide would be stored. She said that omitting this information gives residents no assurance that the gas will stay put, adding that the public should have been allowed to evaluate that information.

Occidental had previously received a grant from the Department of Energy to support the development of direct air capture technology. There’s no mention of that in this story – the grant was awarded in October 2023, so who even knows if they have received or will receive all of the promised funds – but it seems likely that there’s a connection. I expressed my opinion of carbon capture in that post, and it’s the same now as it was then, so click over if you’re curious. I hope this works.

Posted in Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Houston can defer the drainage settlement spending

Can successfully kicked down the road.

Mayor John Whitmire

Mayor John Whitmire and plaintiffs in Houston’s drainage lawsuit have reached a deal on how the city will fund future street and drainage projects, slashing a third of its $330 million budget deficit.

The news was first reported late Tuesday evening by ABC13.

The Texas Supreme Court in January struck down the city’s appeal in the case, which requires Houston to put millions more toward street and drainage projects each year. Bob Jones and Allen Watson, two engineers who helped pioneer a city ordinance to put a certain percentage of property taxes aside for such projects, had sued the city arguing it was shortchanging the drainage fund.

The case pinged back and forth between courts before the city accepted the denial in January. Whitmire has said previously the city intended to comply with the court’s decision.

The dropped appeal ballooned what was once a deficit of $230 million to $330 million for this fiscal year alone. Houston would have had to shell out $100 million to fund projects before the end of June. Members of Whitmire’s team have been in talks with Jones and Watson about phasing in the expenditures to soften the blow to this year’s budget.

ABC13 reported that the deal reached with the plaintiffs will allow Houston to give $16 million to the fund this fiscal year and $48 million the following year. Houston should have the full amount paid by 2028, ABC13 reported.

Chris Newport, the mayor’s chief of staff, said funding will come from three main pots — Metro, ad valorem taxes and the drainage charge. City leaders plan to incrementally charge a percentage of the 11.8 cents per $100 of property tax evaluation required by the city law for the next two years, then charging the full 11.8 cents from 2028 onward to fully stock the drainage fund.

That math will get Houston $490 million in its drainage fund in 2026, $525 million in 2027, $540 million in 2028 and $585 million in 2029, Newport said.

See here and here for the background. Can-kicking jokes aside, this is good. It takes some of the pressure off for this year, and it gives us time to repeal or revise the stupid revenue cap so that we can better absorb the extra costs in future years. Kudos to all for hammering this out. Houston Public Media has more.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Short term rental ordinance passes

Now we get to see how well it works. Future revisions may be needed, and that’s fine.

Starting Jan. 1, all houses and apartments rented out for fewer than 30 days must be registered with the city’s Administration and Regulatory Affairs Department for an annual fee of $275 per unit. Those licenses are subject to revocation if the unit owners, operators or tenants repeatedly are cited for breaking sound, litter or health codes.

Some Houston residents have pushed for such legislation for more than a year and asked the City Council to limit the number of units that could be on a single block or in a multifamily property. The council, however, was restricted by the lack of zoning in Houston, which limits how the city regulates property use.

Council members on Wednesday said the ordinance would act as the start of a larger conversation about enforcement, and they could return later to make it stronger if needed.

“We have to enforce this now,” At-Large Councilmember Julian Ramirez said. “If we don’t take the steps necessary to enforce it then people will still be unhappy.”

Neighbors will be able to report units that break the ordinance and unruly behavior through an online portal next year, ARA Chief of Staff Billy Rudolph said last week.

Citations from police, fire and Public Works will be reported on a monthly basis to ARA, and the director will have discretion through the ordinance to revoke a rental’s license.

If a rental owner or operator has three or more registrations revoked within a two-year period, the ARA director can decide to revoke all of their registrations.

See here and here for the background. Houston Public Media adds some details.

The ordinance requires owners “and/or” operators to register properties with the city for a fee of $275. It also provides criteria for the revocation of registrations, including instances of renters committing certain crimes, like reckless discharge of a firearm, disorderly conduct, prostitution or multiple violations of the city’s noise ordinance.

City council members introduced several amendments, including one to allow the city to revoke all registrations for operators or owners who accrue three or more convictions within a two-year period based on the actions of their renters.

“We’re trying to narrowly tailor this while giving the city some leverage,” Council member Abbie Kamin said. “We’re trying to tread as lightly as possible while still addressing the concerns and needs of the city of Houston.”

A violation of the ordinance classifies as a misdemeanor carrying a fine of up to $500.

The rules are intended to address complaints about noise, parties, crime and other nuisances associated with some short-term rentals.

[…]

Ursula Jessee operates a portfolio of short-term rentals and was part of a “responsible landlords” group pushing for changes to the ordinance.

“I’m not furious, I’m not thrilled,” Jessee told Houston Public Media after the ordinance was approved. “I understand the intent behind it. I do think that some of these things are a bit of an overreach.”

Jessee said the group was concerned about the inclusion of disorderly conduct as grounds for potential revocation of registration as well as the lack of language in the ordinance allowing operators or owners off the hook if they take proactive measures to remove problematic guests.

She also said the group didn’t have time to review the updated amendments introduced by council members, such as the rule allowing revocation of all registrations in an owner or operator’s portfolio if three or more properties lose their registrations in a two-year period. She argued the rule doesn’t take into account owners or operators with large portfolios, and she said the city should have included a timeframe for regaining the right to host short-term renters.

“I personally am uncomfortable with anything that takes away landlord rights,” Jessee said. “So in this case, it makes me a bit uncomfortable that, like, all of a sudden you wouldn’t be able to rent out your properties for less than 30 days. I recognize why they’re doing it, though, and what I would have preferred is that there was a cap.”

[…]

Council member Letitia Plummer called for the creation of a task force consisting of community leaders, owners and operators “that can share with us what they’re experiencing on the back end of this and how it’s either positively affecting them or negatively affecting them.”

Council member Julian Ramirez, who chairs the quality of life committee that first considered the rules, said the ordinance could change in the future. He also said the city needs to ramp up enforcement of not just the new rules but also existing ordinances, like those regulating loud noise in residential areas.

“This is not final. We can always amend it,” Ramirez said. “We have to enforce this now. And so we can pass this, but if we don’t take the steps necessary to enforce it, then people will still be unhappy.”

I think Council did a lot of work on this and produced an ordinance that should be workable. It will almost certainly need some refining as we get data on its effects, and for sure it will only be as good as its enforcement capabilities are. The ordinance comes online in January, so we will have plenty of time to get ready for it. We’ll see how it goes.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Short term rental ordinance passes

Microtransit comes to the Heights

Whoopie.

Houston transit officials on Monday said on-demand microtransit would expand to provide rides in the Heights.

Metro, with the city of Houston and Evolve Houston, expanded the Community Connector service, which has been serving downtown Houston, Second Ward and Third Ward through a program offering free rides.

Microtransit is part of the MetroNow Plan, which officials say could improve mobility by using small vehicles designed for short distances. Board Chair Elizabeth Gonzalez Brock said in February that MetroNow had $10 million to expand microtransit services.

The microtransit shuttle can provide seating for up to five people, and riders can reserve three seats.

The Heights service will operate Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Rides are requested within the designated zone by using the Ride Circuit app.

See here, here, and here for the background. Among many other things, I’m very curious as to how they define “the Heights” for these purposes. Depending on how strict your construction is, that could be a pretty significant portion of the upper west Inner Loop quadrant. I’m also curious as to why we were next on the list, since in other contexts (like sidewalks and bike paths), Mayor Whitmire has carped about how the Heights and Montrose have been over-prioritized by previous administrations. And yet here we are getting this thing none of us asked for or knew was coming. Funny how that works.

Someone who has already used it is Chron deputy opinion editor and Heights neighbor Raj Mankad, who shares his experience.

That was how I intended to use the Community Connector shuttle: to get me to the Quitman light rail stop where I’d continue my morning commute. Unfortunately, the app gave Davenport bad directions, and we took an unintentional tour of the Near Northside. (Later, Casey Brown, Evolve’s executive director, told me he would get the first-day glitch fixed.)

But we got there. I enjoyed the ride. And assuming that they work out the glitches, I’ll use it again.

What about all of you who don’t live in the Heights, Third Ward, Second Ward or Downtown? Will the service come to your neighborhood any time soon?

That depends on the cost per rider.

One of the most expensive parts is paying the driver. And obviously, a driver of a full-sized bus or train can move a lot more passengers than the driver of an itsy-bitsy vehicle that carries a maximum of five people.

The subsidy per ride for the microtransit pilot in Los Angeles was a whopping $43 per ride according to reporting by the Los Angeles Times in 2023, and two years later, the costs there remain high. Yes, all public transit is subsidized by tax dollars, but that’s boggling.

Metro does not include microtransit in its monthly ridership reports, so it’s hard to compare its costs. Casey Brown, the head of Evolve, told me that in Houston “we’ve consistently achieved a cost per passenger of under $10 for several months” in one zone, though the average across the pilot program is higher. He said Evolve keeps costs down in part by using smaller vehicles and tighter coverage zones than other cities. As ridership and efficiency go up, he says the subsidy per rider drops.

The total number of microtransit rides from June 19, 2023, until the end of this April was a little over 44,000. To put that in perspective, almost every single METRO bus line carries more riders each year than the entire microtransit program — even those buses you see midday with hardly anyone in the seats.

[…]

Piloting microtransit now could prepare Houston for the upheaval ahead. Instead of letting tech companies dictate the future, jamming up our roads with robotaxis, the public can take some control and shape what kind of city we want.

But here’s the problem: Even if we manage to get microtransit right, those darling shuttles won’t be enough. Remember how microtransit is supposed to close the gaps with full-sized transit? To supplement it, not substitute for it?

To put it plainly, Houston’s main system isn’t good enough. Even if every neighborhood were magically served by its own fleet of irresistible fun-size transit, those little shuttles wouldn’t have the big system they need to feed into. It’d be like having great capillaries but clogged arteries.

We need more dedicated lanes for people who share vehicles, whether that’s shuttles, buses or trains. That includes HOV lanes. We need Metro to un-cancel its plans for the University Line, especially the crucial east-west section of the bus rapid transit connection. We need to move more people, fast, pleasantly and cost-effectively.

Don’t forget the Inner Katy Line, which would also serve the Heights. Assuming that whatever they’re doing to I-10 hasn’t permanently killed this possibility. And hey, you know what else fills in the gaps for the larger transit system, at a much lower cost? Bike lanes and good sidewalks. I’m just saying.

Be that as it may, here we are again at the total lack of numbers with this service. Maybe someday we’ll find out how many people have actually used this service, in its various locations, and thus maybe get some idea of the value it provides. Heck, even knowing how many people have downloaded the app and how many of them have ever reserved a ride would be nice. Until then, I’ll be on Microtransit Watch, to see how often I personally encounter one of these things. I’ll do my best to take a picture the first time I do, and post it here. I’m sure you’re full of anticipation.

UPDATE: Via the Weird Sh*t in the Heights (Houston) Facebook group, I learn the following:

The heights has two areas. North of 11th and south of 11th. East to 45 and west to shepherd. South to I-10 and north to 610. Within each box the ride is direct. If you go outside the box then you have to put in a transfer. So if you live on the 1500 block of harvard and want to go to the heights theater there’s no transfer. But if you live on the 1500 block of harvard and want to go to Donovan Park at 7th/Heights then you will need to transfer at 11th. It’s mainly for short trips if you don’t want to have the hassle of transfers.

The definition of “the Heights” as I-10 to 610 and Shepherd to I-45 makes sense. Dividing it into north of 11th and south of 11th and requiring a transfer to get from one side to the other is a bit ridiculous, and means there are at least two of these bespoke shuttles in the greater neighborhood during its hours of operation. A few people in the comments have spotted them around. I’m still looking.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of April 14

The Texas Progressive Alliance stands with the students who have had their visas revoked as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of April 14

Measles update: More on how we’ve done this to ourselves

From the Associated Press:

The measles outbreak in West Texas didn’t happen just by chance.

The easily preventable disease, declared eliminated in the U.S. in 2000, ripped through communities sprawling across more than 20 Texas counties in part because health departments were starved of the funding needed to run vaccine programs, officials say.

“We haven’t had a strong immunization program that can really do a lot of boots-on-the-ground work for years,” said Katherine Wells, the health director in Lubbock, a 90-minute drive from the outbreak’s epicenter.

Immunization programs nationwide have been left brittle by years of stagnant funding by federal, state and local governments. In Texas and elsewhere, this helped set the stage for the measles outbreak and fueled its spread. Now cuts to federal funding threaten efforts to prevent more cases and outbreaks.

Health departments got an influx of cash to deal with COVID-19, but it wasn’t enough to make up for years of neglect. On top of that, trust in vaccines has eroded. Health officials warn the situation is primed to get worse.

Recent cuts by the Trump administration have pulled billions of dollars in COVID-19 related funding — $2 billion of it slated for immunization programs for various diseases. Overseeing the cuts is Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who rose to prominence leading an anti-vaccine movement. While Kennedy has said he wants his agency to prevent future outbreaks, he’s also declined to deliver a consistent and forceful message that would help do so — encouraging people to vaccinate their children against measles while reminding them it is safe.

At the same time, lawmakers in Texas and about two-thirds of states have introduced legislation this year that would make it easier to opt out of vaccines or otherwise put up barriers to ensuring more people get shots, according to an analysis by The Associated Press. That further undercuts efforts to keep infectious diseases at bay, health officials said.

[…]

Lubbock receives a $254,000 immunization grant from the state annually that can be used for staff, outreach, advertising, education and other elements of a vaccine program. That hasn’t increased in at least 15 years as the population grew.

It used to be enough for three nurses, an administrative assistant, advertising and even goodies to give out at health fairs, Wells said. “Now it covers a nurse, a quarter of a nurse, a little bit of an admin assistant, and basically nothing else.”

Texas has among the lowest per capita state funding for public health in the nation, just $17 per person in 2023, according to the State Health Access Data Assistance Center.

Vaccines are among the most successful tools in public health’s arsenal, preventing debilitating illnesses and lowering the need for expensive medical care. Childhood vaccines prevent 4 million deaths worldwide each year, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which says the measles vaccine will save some 19 million lives by 2030.

U.S. immunization programs are funded by a variable mix of federal, state and local money. Federal money is sent to every state, which then decides how much to send to local health departments.

The stagnant immunization grant funding in Texas has made it harder for local health departments to keep their programs going. Lubbock’s health department, for example, doesn’t have the money to pay for targeted Facebook ads to encourage vaccinations or do robust community outreach to build trust.

In Andrews County, which borders Gaines County, the biggest cost of its immunization program is personnel. But while everything has gotten more expensive, the grant hasn’t changed, Health Director Gordon Mattimoe said. That shifts the burden to county governments. Some kick in more money, some don’t. His did.

The problem: keeping people safe from outbreaks requires high vaccination rates across a broad region, and germs don’t stop at county borders.

Andrews County, population 18,000, offers a walk-in vaccine clinic Monday through Friday, but other West Texas communities don’t. More than half the people who come to the clinic travel from other counties, Mattimoe said, including much larger places and Gaines County.

Some had to drive an hour or more. They did so because they had trouble getting shots in their home county due to long waits, lack of providers and other issues, Mattimoe said.

“They’re unable to obtain it in the place that they live. … People are overflowing, over to here,” Mattimoe said. “There’s an access issue.”

That makes it more likely people won’t get their shots.

In Gaines County just 82% of kindergartners were vaccinated against measles, mumps and rubella. Even in Andrews County, where, at 97%, the vaccination rate is above the 95% threshold for preventing outbreaks, it has slipped two percentage points since 2020.

Andrews County is Gaines County’s neighbor to the south. They were doing pretty well before all this, despite being as small and in the middle of nowhere as Gaines is. So much for that.

From the KFF Health News.

More than a dozen vaccination clinics were canceled in Pima County, Arizona.

So was a media blitz to bring low-income children in Washoe County, Nevada, up to date on their shots.

Planned clinics were also scuttled in TexasMinnesota, and Washington, among other places.

Immunization efforts across the country were upended after the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention abruptly canceled $11.4 billion in covid-related funds for state and local health departments in late March.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the cuts last week, but many of the organizations that receive the funds said they must proceed as though they’re gone, raising concerns amid a resurgence of measles, a rise in vaccine hesitancy, and growing distrust of public health agencies.

“I’m particularly concerned about the accessibility of vaccines for vulnerable populations,” former U.S. surgeon general Jerome Adams told KFF Health News. Adams served in President Donald Trump’s first administration. “Without high vaccination rates, we are setting those populations and communities up for preventable harm.”

[…]

In Pima County, Arizona, officials learned that one of its vaccination programs would have to end early because the federal government took away its remaining $1 million in grant money. The county had to cancel about 20 vaccine events offering covid and flu shots that it had already scheduled, said Theresa Cullen, director of the county health department. And it isn’t able to plan any more, she said.

The county is home to Tucson, the second-largest city in Arizona. But it also has sprawling rural areas, including part of the Tohono O’odham Nation, that are far from many health clinics and pharmacies, she said.

The county used the federal grant to offer free vaccines in mostly rural areas, usually on the weekends or after usual work hours on weekdays, Cullen said. The programs are held at community organizations, during fairs and other events, or inside buses turned into mobile health clinics.

Canceling vaccine-related grants has an impact beyond immunization rates, Cullen said. Vaccination events are also a chance to offer health education, connect people with other resources they may need, and build trust between communities and public health systems, she said.

County leaders knew the funding would run out at the end of June, but Cullen said the health department had been in talks with local communities to find a way to continue the events. Now “we’ve said, ‘Sorry, we had a commitment to you and we’re not able to honor it,’” she said.

Cullen said the health department won’t restart the events even though a judge temporarily blocked the funding cuts.

“The vaccine equity grant is a grant that goes from the CDC to the state to us,” she said. “The state is who gave us a stop work order.”

The full effect of the CDC cuts is not yet clear in many places. California Department of Public Health officials estimated that grant terminations would result in at least $840 million in federal funding losses for its state, including $330 million used for virus monitoring, testing, childhood vaccines, and addressing health disparities.

“We are working to evaluate the impact of these actions,” said California Department of Public Health Director Erica Pan.

Jerome Adams, who seems to be a pretty normal dude despite having been Surgeon General during Trump I, has a quote at the end of that story about how none of this is making America healthy, saying you “can’t die from chronic diseases when you’re 50 if you’ve already died from measles or polio or whooping cough when you’re 5”. I mean, he’s right.

And here’s your Tuesday update.

Texas health officials reported Tuesday that the state’s measles outbreak grew to 561 cases and spread to one new county.

The latest update from the Texas Department of State Health Services includes 20 new cases since the agency’s last update on Friday. Among the new cases is the first in Reeves County, in West Texas.

Fifty-eight people have been hospitalized for treatment since the outbreak began in late January.

[…]

The Texas outbreak has also spread several neighboring states. New Mexico reported 63 cases on Tuesday, while Oklahoma reported 12. New Mexico has reported one suspected measles death, an unvaccinated adult who tested positive for the virus after dying.

Nine of the 20 new cases reported on Tuesday are in Gaines County, the epicenter of the outbreak. The small county along the New Mexico border has now seen a total of 364 cases.

El Paso County reported four new cases, raising its total to seven. The state’s westernmost county reported its first cases on Friday.

Three new cases were reported in Lubbock County, which has now seen 41 during the outbreak.

Reeves County reported its first case associated with the outbreak. Andrews, Cochran, and Midland counties also reported one new case.

The DSHS said there is ongoing measles transmission in 10 counties across the state: Cochran, Dallam, Dawson, Gaines, Garza, Lynn, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

Of the 561 cases in Texas, 175 have been in children younger than 5 years old and 206 have been in children and teens between 5 and 17, according to the DSHS.

Only 11 cases have been in people who received at least one dose of MMR vaccine prior to an infection.

Texas has reported a total of seven measles cases in 2025 that are not connected to the South Plains outbreak, including four in Harris County and one in Fort Bend County. Most of those cases are associated with international travel, according to the DSHS.

Yesterday was a bit of a dumpster fire for me, so I didn’t go out looking for more stories; the first two I found before Tuesday. Two things to note: One is the outbreak now reaching into more populated areas – El Paso, Lubbock, Midland – which may provide a lot more kindling for the fire. You can hope the vax rates are better in those places than they are in the likes of Gaines County, but those three have a lot more people in them, and even a small percentage of a big number is still a big number. And two, the story says that the DSHS estimates about four percent of the affected people – about 25 in total – are actively infectious. That’s not a lot, but on average a person with the measles is capable of passing it on to 18 other people, and that is a lot. Remember, the best guess is that this will last for a year or so. We’ve got a long way to go.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Measles update: More on how we’ve done this to ourselves

A possible wrench in the voucher engine

I approve.

House Democrats are threatening to kill all constitutional amendments for the rest of session unless the House votes to put school vouchers before voters in November. They appear to have the numbers to make good on that special session-inducing threat.

More than 50 House Democrats have signed on to that plan, according to at least four Democrats and Capitol staffers briefed on the tally, enough to handcuff the Legislature on constitutional amendments. The move comes as Gov. Greg Abbott is attempting to squash any changes to his top legislative priority, Senate Bill 2, including a bill amendment that would have voters weigh in on the proposed education savings account program.

Blocking constitutional amendments is one of the last bits of leverage Texas Democrats have left after House Republicans this session undid the decades-long tradition of giving the minority party committee chairmanships. Killing vouchers is Democrats’ top legislative priority, and Democrats say they are prepared to pull all the stops to thwart the measure and others they oppose.

Constitutional amendments require at least 100 votes from the House’s 150 members to pass the chamber before going before Texas voters. With 62 Democrats in the House, Republicans need at least 12 Democrats to make any constitutional amendment happen.

Several top Republican and bipartisan priorities hinge on the passage of constitutional amendments. One of those priorities would allow judges to deny bail for certain violent level offenses. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has threatened to force a special session if the Legislature fails to pass that measure.

Yesterday, House Joint Resolution 5 author Rep. Stan Lambert, — a Republican from Abilene who so happens to oppose vouchers — postponed that resolution addressing funding for the Texas State Technical College system till next week. The House will go through another test today, when the chamber is supposed to take up previously postponed measures banning “death taxes” (House Joint Resolution 2) and capital gains taxes (House Joint Resolution 6).

All proposed constitutional amendments must earn voters’ support in November to take effect. If Democrats get their way, the education savings account program would similarly appear on the November ballot.

Democrats have been searching for a Republican to carry the ballot measure amendment to SB 2 when the House takes up the measure tomorrow. Quorum Report first reported the existence of the amendment yesterday, as well as Abbott’s attempts to keep Republicans in line.

I’d like to see Dems continue to stand firm against that bullshit bail measure, and it would be fine by me if they sunk HJRs 2 and 6 as well, but forcing a popular vote on vouchers as a price for whatever level of support they give those resolutions is a reasonable goal. Naturally, Greg Abbott is throwing a fit.

According to reporting by Scott Braddock at Quorum Report, GOP sources say Abbott has told lawmakers that putting the issue on the ballot would be unconstitutional — even though there’s precedent for statewide votes on similar matters. In the past, Texans voted on horse racing and a proposal by then-Gov. Mark White to gain appointment power over the State Board of Education, neither of which were constitutional amendments.

Braddock reports that some lawmakers believe there may be as many as 80 to 85 votes — from both Republicans and Democrats — in favor of the ballot proposal. The governor, however, is said to be calling members into his office and threatening to veto unrelated bills if they offer or support amendments to his voucher legislation on the House floor.

“For Republican lawmakers who have long been on the record against school vouchers in any form, Abbott has not renewed threats to veto unrelated legislation if all they do is vote ‘no’ on final passage,” Braddock wrote. “But even among those members, Abbott could decimate their legislative agendas with blanket vetoes of all their bills if any of them were to lead the charge to amend the voucher legislation on the floor this week.”

Frustrations are also mounting over transparency. Braddock reports that Public Education Committee Chair Brad Buckley told legislators they could pick up physical copies of school finance “runs” — spreadsheets detailing how districts would fare under the plan — at the Capitol between 7 and 9 p.m. Monday night. In previous sessions, such materials were distributed publicly online to allow school districts and lawmakers time to review and respond.

“Even some Republican members who support ‘school choice’ were grumbling about why the meeting was not broadcast online on the House website,” Braddock wrote, referring to a recent Public Education Committee meeting that passed both HB 2 and the voucher bills to the Calendars Committee.

Though technically not violating the state’s rules on transparency, the move drew condemnation from Democrats on the committee, who livestreamed their own recording of the meeting in response.

“If this is landmark legislation that we’re proud of, why aren’t we opening this up for all to see?” one frustrated GOP member told QR.

The Texas House GOP Caucus informed members in an email that Abbott will attend their meeting on Wednesday. Several lawmakers told QR that the governor has already begun one-on-one meetings to press his case and discourage changes to the legislation.

The minority has got to do what it’s got to do to exert influence. This is a situation where their influence isn’t subject to a future rules change or special session circumstances. This puts the Republicans in a tough spot, and that’s great. It’s exactly what you want to do to them.

Objectively, Abbott should give the Dems this relatively small win and then get his billionaire enablers to blanket the airwaves with pro-voucher propaganda and hope to win the vote in the fall. But it’s not guaranteed, even with a small electorate turning out, and I’m sure this just chaps his hide – the very idea, giving the Dems even a procedural win. Up to you, Greg. Do you accept the challenge or put even more of a squeeze on your supposed allies? We’ll know soon enough.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A possible wrench in the voucher engine

RIP, Houston Landing

Major bummer.

The board of Houston Landing has voted to shut down the nonprofit newsroom in the face of financial challenges. Although Houston Landing launched with significant seed funding, it has been unable to build additional revenue streams to support ongoing operations.

The newsroom anticipates it will cease publishing by mid-May of this year. This timeline will enable Houston Landing to facilitate a thoughtful transition.

“We are proud of the Landing’s coverage of Greater Houston and continue to believe deeply in the need for more free, independent journalism in our region,” said Ann B. Stern, board chair of Houston Landing. “This decision was difficult but necessary. Houston Landing’s reporting has made a meaningful impact in the community, but it struggled to find its long-term financial footing.”

The Houston Landing board continues to believe there is a strong need for nonprofit local news in Houston and a viable path to sustaining it. The board has entered into discussions with The Texas Tribune, which is exploring the possibility of establishing a Houston news initiative as part of its broader strategy to expand local journalism and serve more Texans.

“We have great respect for Houston Landing’s work in delivering high-quality, nonpartisan journalism to its readers,” said Sonal Shah, CEO of The Texas Tribune. “We also understand the profound challenges facing local newsrooms today — journalism is a public service and needs a strong ecosystem to thrive. We look forward to exploring how we can learn from what the Landing started and create a sustainable model that serves the Houston community. We will take time to explore the right path forward to ensure sustainability.”

Here’s the letter from their CEO. I’ve obviously been a fan of their reporting – they’ve especially done strong work on schools and school districts in general, and HISD in particular – and it sucks to have such a good resource go away. Maybe the Texas Tribune, which has been setting up local newsrooms, can hire some soon-to-be-former Landing staffers and fill the gap a bit. Maybe another startup can do better. Maybe this was just bad timing and the next try will have better luck. Whatever the case, I’ll miss the Houston Landing when it’s gone. Thanks for all the good work and I wish you the best with whatever comes next.

Posted in Other punditry | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

An early progress report on the new DA

Sounds good so far.

Sean Teare

Harris County’s jail population declined 6% since February, and District Attorney Sean Teare secured more than $7 million in funding from the county Thursday to keep the trend going.

The $7.6 million in funding, approved by all Harris County Commissioners, with Harris County Judge Hidalgo abstaining from the vote Thursday, is intended to help prevent drivers of violent crime, support victims, decrease the jail population and cut into the county’s backlog of cases.

Around $2.6 million will go toward expanding the DA’s office’s domestic violence bureau and mental health and diversion bureau to provide more support to victims and defendants and prevent large drivers of crime.

“We will never be able to prosecute our way out of some of the things we’re seeing … We have to work with stakeholders outside to give individuals the mental health care they need so we’re not just keeping people in jail,” said Chandler Raine, first assistant to Teare.

The rest of the funding will go toward forensic investigations, more prosecutors and staff expansion, with the hope that prosecuting more cases will lead to more violent offenders going to state prison, instead of staying in the county jail along with people awaiting trial who can’t afford to make bond. Commissioners said the current case clearance rate is around 30%.

The hope is also that prosecuting more cases could cut back on the tens of millions of dollars the county has to spend to outsource inmates to private prisons.

“The fact that we spend nearly $50 million annually outsourcing people to private prisons appalled me,” said Precinct 4 Commissioner Lesley Briones. “I know it’s necessary given the current reality, but the key to changing the current reality is here … I’d rather invest my money in justice than private prisons.”

Just having the District Attorney on the same page as Commissioners Court is a positive development. I don’t want to draw too many conclusions this early on, but I like what I see so far. Let’s keep it going.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Fully autonomous trucks set to hit the road

For realsies.

Autonomous freight trucks are slated to hit the Dallas highways this month. The self-driving heavy-duty semi-trucks running on technology formulated by Aurora, a Pittsburgh-based self-driving vehicle tech company, will roll back and forth along the Interstate 45 corridor connecting Dallas and Houston. This busy stretch of freeway will be the launch site for Aurora’s fleet of self-driving trucks, with an additional route between Fort Worth and El Paso, already planned.

“Opening a driverless trucking lane flanked by commercially-ready terminals is an industry-first that unlocks our ability to launch our driverless trucking product,” said Sterling Anderson, co-founder and chief product officer of Aurora in a 2023 press release announcing local Aurora terminals were ready for driverless operations. “With this corridor’s launch, we’ve defined, refined, and validated the framework for the expansion of our network with the largest partner ecosystem in the autonomous trucking industry.”

In a March shareholder letter, Aurora outlined its progressive plan for trucks on the highway, calling it a “crawl, walk, run approach.”

“During launch, we expect to deploy up to 10 driverless trucks in commercial operations, starting with one driverless truck and then transitioning the balance to driverless operation,” reads the letter.

According to a report from the National Transportation Research Group, Texas moved more freight than any other state in 2022, about 3.4 billion tons valued at $3.1 trillion. More than half of all truck freight that moves through Texas takes the strip of I-45 that Aurora’s trucks will navigate.

Aurora is partnered with several vehicle manufacturers, including the Denton-based Peterbilt, installing their software and hardware on pre-built trucks, enabling self-driving features. The tech company is also partnered with freight companies like FedEx and Uber Freight. Aurora’s self-driving tech, named Aurora Driver, includes a mix of radar, light detection and a series of cameras, removing the need for human intervention.

“We are on the cusp of a new era in transportation,” reads a press release from Aurora’s head of government relations, Gerardo Interiano. “Autonomous vehicles are no longer just a concept — they are being deployed in trucking, passenger mobility, agriculture, and mining, paving the way for a safer, more efficient future. Aurora’s plans to deploy self-driving trucks onto public roads in Texas will bring the benefits of autonomy directly to our supply chain and economy.”

See here for the previous update, which in January of 2024 promised we’d have these autonomous trucks with no human backup drivers on the road by the end of that year. The timing slipped a little, but here we are. There was a long story in the business section of the Thursday print edition that went into a lot of detail about this, but for some annoying reason it’s not on the Chron site or visible in Google news. We do have this Chron story from March 31 that gave a bit of a preview.

Aurora, a developer of self-driving vehicles, has released its report during its final preparations to launch self-driving trucks without a safety driver on Texas highways.

The Driverless Safety Report includes information on safety engineering, cybersecurity and risk management, according to Aurora in the news release. The report is an expanded version of the Voluntary Safety Self-Assessment — documents encouraged by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for companies who develop and launch automated driving systems.

“Our safety approach spans both product and organization, and in this report, we’ve shared a behind-the-scenes look into our safety systems,” said Nat Beuse, chief safety officer at Aurora, in a statement.

The NHTSA has a voluntary safety guidance document that notes 12 elements, including system safety, object and event detection and response, human-machine interface, crashworthiness, and compliance with federal, state and local laws.

When the NHTSA becomes aware of a new assessment publication, it’s added to the Voluntary Safety Self-Assessment index online and made available to the public.

Aurora has been partnering with FedEx, Uber Freight, Hirshbach and Schneider for its self-driving system, the Aurora Driver, on the Dallas to Houston route. The company has not yet announced who will be a part of the fleet for the driverless operations, according to Jake Martin, spokesperson for Aurora.

Aurora officials will also have to close its safety case framework before the launch.

Amy Witherite, founder of the Witherite Law Group and a traffic safety expert in Texas, said that although she applauds Aurora’s efforts, she is still concerned about the report’s lack of specific details about how often or under what circumstances the company’s automation had failed or required human intervention.

“With literally billions of dollars at stake, it is fair to ask whether companies who will potentially profit from this technology should be the ones who decide whether it is safe to put on our highways,” she said in a statement.

Martin said in an email that Aurora submits safety incidents to the NHTSA and the company doesn’t publish them independently.

The company plans to have full driverless operations on Texas highways in April. The trucks were traveling with a safety driver present to monitor the self-driving system’s performance. Aurora’s full report can be read online.

I figure there will be more coverage once the trucks are actually on the road. KVUE has a video story if that interests you. These trucks with the safety drivers have been on the road since 2021 with a sufficiently good track record that you probably weren’t aware of their presence on I-45. According to that so-far-print-only Chron story, the safety drivers have rarely had to intervene, and most of the time that they did they were being more cautious than was necessary. The basic idea here is that while this will reduce the need for long-haul truckers, for which there’s a shortage, it will open up opportunities for short-haul drivers. We’ll see how this goes.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A high school transfer portal

Almost certainly not going to happen, at least this session, but an interesting thought experiment.

House Bill 619 is a straightforward two-page document. But the ramifications of its potential passing would drastically alter the landscape of high school sports in Texas. It’s why the state’s leaders in public school athletics have voiced their opposition to it.

HB 619, authored by Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins of San Antonio, proposes that any public high school student in Texas be granted a one-time, penalty-free transfer to another district for athletic purposes. The bill also proposes that the University Interscholastic League — which oversees public school extracurricular activities across the state — may not penalize students for making a transfer under those circumstances. The rule would go into effect beginning with the 2025-26 school year.

[…]

UIL rules currently prohibit students from transferring for athletic purposes, and those deemed to have done so are ruled ineligible for one school year. The UIL passed several measures during its fall legislative session in October seemingly aimed at cracking down on violations. The UIL state executive committee now has the authority to investigate schools deemed to have an inordinate number of transfer students intending to participate in athletics. Every student who changes schools and intends to play sports is required to fill out the Previous Athletic Participation Forms (PAPF), which includes 18 yes-or-no questions pertaining to the student’s residence, family situation and potential recruiting violations.

The issue of inordinate transfer numbers made headlines during the fall when Oak Cliff Faith Family Academy in Dallas was heavily penalized for recruiting. Several highly touted girls basketball players transferred to the charter school after state title-winning coach Andrea Robinson was hired. Faith Family made a decision to vacate its UIL membership before meetings were held to determine whether the girls transferred for athletic purposes.

The UIL does not comment on pending legislation like HB 619, but its leaders have been consistent with their enforcement of the rules outlined in the organization’s constitution. Dr. Jamey Harrison, who was appointed as the new UIL executive director last week, spoke about those challenges at the organization’s fall legislative meeting last October.

“We know that we have some keystone eligibility rules that we need to keep at our core,” said Harrison, who’s been the UIL deputy executive director since 2011. “All of that is related to having community and educational basis to our activities and to having as level of a playing field as we can possibly provide to schools. There are some instances where that doesn’t feel like it’s happening anymore, and we need to find new ways to address it. We’ve talked about a number of those over the past several years. To be honest with you, I think we were guilty of trying to find simple solutions to remarkably complex challenges, and what we’ve learned is, it’s going to take a more complex set of solutions.”

Leaders at both the Texas High School Coaches Association and the Texas High School Athletic Directors Association are opposed to HB 619. One of their most pertinent concerns is that it undermines the concept of high school sports being community-based.

“House Bill 619 has really sparked debate because it really challenges, in our opinion, the values that make Texas high school athletics so unique and cherished,” THSCA executive director Joe Martin told the Chronicle. “The state of Texas has long been a beacon of community-based athletics, and it’s very different than some other states in our country. Local high schools represent more than just sports. They embody the spirit, the pride, the identity of an entire community. HB 619 risks undermining this legacy by prioritizing individual mobility over the collective culture that defines Texas high school sports.”

Martin pointed to Florida as the primary example of what could happen to high school athletics in Texas should HB 619 come to fruition. Florida Gov. Rick Scott signed House Bill 7029 into law in 2016, which allowed students to transfer freely between schools across the state and does not have any restrictions on competing in athletics immediately. Martin said moving away from the current UIL transfer rules would compromise the support high school teams receive from their communities at home and at the state championship level.

[…]

Proponents of HB 619 would argue that allowing students to transfer for athletic purposes would provide them an escape from less desirable situations. Whether it’s coaching changes, lack of playing time or any other unfavorable circumstances, transferring to another school without the threat of suspension could provide an avenue for a fresh start for some kids. With an improvement in those situations, particularly with playing time, that has the potential to provide a better path to compete in college athletics and earn scholarships. But while individual situations can vary, Dowling argues that one of the overarching purposes of high school sports is for students to learn how to battle through adverse situations. For those facing extenuating circumstances, the UIL has a hardship waiver process in place.

“One of the most important components of high school athletics is to help prepare the student-athlete for life as an adult and to be able to navigate the difficulties of adulthood through their participation in athletics,” Dowling said. “That’s a concept I think we all agree with. Simply put, you do not always win, and there’s no guarantee of playing time unless you put the time and effort into it, much the same as an adult does as they, too, navigate life and work. I think this bill allows an athlete to easily escape that reality.”

As the story notes, HB619 hasn’t had a committee hearing yet, and as a Democratic bill without an obvious constituency but with a vocal opposition, it’s not going anywhere. I still find it fascinating to read about. Like, tell me more about the Florida experience. Does the THSCA have anything more than anecdotal evidence to cite? What exactly were the arguments that the Florida proponents put forth? I can’t imagine that state’s legislature gives a damn about athlete empowerment, so there must have been some other stated reason to put this into law. It may well be a bad reason, a reason to make me fully onboard with the THSCA, I’m just curious as to what it is. That law was passed in 2016, and a bit of googling found a couple of negative reactions.

To be clear, I do share the skepticism being expressed, and the “high school sports as shared community” argument has merit. But coaches, football coaches in particular, as a class and as a matter of makeup, are going to favor the current system and oppose changes more or less automatically. Maybe as a matter of my makeup, I’m not going to just take their word for it.

One more thing that I fixate on is that the pro-transfer portal argument sounds a lot like the pro-school voucher argument, in ways that are quite uncomfortable. Like, I could see myself get swayed by the idea of high school athletes having more say in their situations, right up to the point where the voucher bros show up and turn “provide them an escape from less desirable situations” into something diabolical. To be sure, voucher opponents have made the argument that vouchers would be bad for Texas high school football, so maybe I’m just being ridiculous. I’m just saying, this is a rich text.

Posted in Other sports, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

It’s not just measles

Welcome back, whooping cough. We didn’t miss you, but here you are again.

In the past six months, two babies in Louisiana have died of pertussis, the disease commonly known as whooping cough.

Washington state recently announced its first confirmed death from pertussis in more than a decade.

Idaho and South Dakota each reported a death this year, and Oregon last year reported two as well as its highest number of cases since 1950.

While much of the country is focused on the spiraling measles outbreak concentrated in the small, dusty towns of West Texas, cases of pertussis have skyrocketed by more than 1,500% nationwide since hitting a recent low in 2021 amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Deaths tied to the disease are also up, hitting 10 last year, compared with about two to four in previous years. Cases are on track to exceed that total this year.

Doctors, researchers and public health experts warn that the measles outbreak, which has grown to more than 600 cases, may just be the beginning. They say outbreaks of preventable diseases could get much worse with falling vaccination rates and the Trump administration slashing spending on the country’s public health infrastructure.

National rates for four major vaccines, which had held relatively steady in the years before the COVID-19 pandemic, have fallen significantly since, according to a ProPublica analysis of the most recent federal kindergarten vaccination data. Not only have vaccination rates for measles, mumps and rubella fallen, but federal data shows that so have those for pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B and polio.

In addition, public health experts say that growing pockets of unvaccinated populations across the country place babies and young children in danger should there be a resurgence of these diseases.

Many medical authorities view measles, which is especially contagious, as the canary in the coal mine, but pertussis cases may also be a warning, albeit one that has attracted far less attention.

“This is not just measles,” said Dr. Adam Ratner, a pediatric infectious diseases doctor in New York City and author of the book “Booster Shots: The Urgent Lessons of Measles and the Uncertain Future of Children’s Health.” “It’s a bright-red warning light.”

At least 36 states have witnessed a drop in rates for at least one key vaccine from the 2013-14 to the 2023-24 school years. And half of states have seen an across-the-board decline in all four vaccination rates. Wisconsin, Utah and Alaska have experienced some of the most precipitous drops during that time, with declines of more than 10 percentage points in some cases.

“There is a direct correlation between vaccination rates and vaccine-preventable disease outbreak rates,” said a spokesperson for the Utah Department of Health and Human Services. “Decreases in vaccination rates will likely lead to more outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases in Utah.”

But statewide figures alone don’t provide a full picture. Tucked inside each state are counties and communities with far lower vaccination rates that drive outbreaks.

For example, the whooping cough vaccination rate for kindergartners in Washington state in 2023-24 was 90.2%, slightly below the U.S. rate of 92.3%, federal data shows. But the statewide rate for children 19 to 35 months last year was 65.4%, according to state data. In four counties, that rate was in the 30% range. In one county, it was below 12%.

“My concern is that there is going to be a large outbreak of not just measles, but other vaccine-preventable diseases as well, that’s going to end up causing a lot of harm, and possibly deaths in children and young adults,” said Dr. Anna Durbin, a professor in the Department of International Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health who has spent her career studying vaccines. “And it’s completely preventable.”

There’s more, so read the rest. The numbers above may sound small, but later in the story it says there were over 35k cases of whooping cough last year – that’s up from about 2,400 in 2021; the COVID pandemic did have the effect of limiting the spread of other infectious diseases – and we expect to outpace that this year. For a disease for which there is a highly effective vaccine. And as with measles, it’s not just whooping cough that is expected to make a comeback. Polio, diptheria, tetanus, they’re on the list too. I don’t know how bad it’s going to get, but it’s going to get bad. Vaccinate your kids.

Posted in National news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on It’s not just measles

Still working on that short-term rental ordinance

I wish them luck.

Two things were evident in an hours-long Quality of Life Committee meeting this week: the Houston City Council wants an ordinance governing short-term rentals that will protect neighborhoods from party houses. But without enforceable zoning codes, that may not be possible.

Houston isn’t unique in its plight to regulate Airbnbs and other rental units where guests stay for a weekend or up to 30 days. Cities across the United States have attempted to balance the much-needed revenue that comes from registration fees and hotel occupancy taxes with the complaints of noise and illegal activity in residential neighborhoods. Houston is unique, however, in that the City Council can’t define these rentals as hotels and zone them out of residential areas. Even if they were to do so, other large cities like Dallas have imposed such bans and been sued so the party houses continue to plague neighborhoods while the ordinances on the books remain unenforceable.

An ordinance discussed at last week’s Houston City Council meeting was again on the table for a vote Wednesday but postponed to April 16 for further review. Four council-proposed amendments were revised; one was withdrawn.

[…]

No one is arguing about the requirement for operators and employees to watch a training video on human and sex trafficking — but also no one thinks that will solve the party house problem.

The party house problem is a big one but it’s limited to particular areas with “bad actor” operators, city officials have said. Still, it’s difficult to restrict the bad guys while not punishing the good ones. The City Council has received complaints on 27 properties out of more than 8,500 short-term rentals. More than 700 short-term rental units are in apartment complexes or townhomes, At Large Council Member Sallie Alcorn said.

Alcorn has been at the forefront of the short-term rental debate along with District C Councilwoman Abbie Kamin and Quality of Life Committee Chair Julian Martinez. Alcorn said Tuesday she recently stayed in an Airbnb in another city.

“I got a book of rules that said I couldn’t even play music that could be heard outside or else the compliance officer was going to knock on my door,” she said. “I was like, wow, there’s a short-term rental compliance officer in this city? We don’t have anything like that.

“I know it’s a balance but we have to protect neighborhoods,” Alcorn added. “It’s a real balance because we know there are a lot of responsible owners out there doing the right thing. We don’t want to hurt you … But I won’t bend on a problem property … that has consistent problems that have been adjudicated. There’s something wrong with the owner if this is happening at your property.”

See here for the background, and read the rest for the amendments that were discussed. I agree that the focus should be on the problem properties, the party houses, but it sounds like that’s easier said than done. I guess my approach at this point would be to put something out there, study its effects for six months or a year, and then make revisions as needed. Again, probably easier said than done but you gotta try.

UPDATE: The Houston Landing published this story today about the winding road the STR ordinance has taken, with a few extra details. Wednesday is going to be a fun day for Council.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

More on the Australian redclaw crayfish

Time to meet another invasive species.

The South Texas odyssey of the Australian redclaw crayfish continues. Approaching five years since the lobster-like creatures were first reported in the Brownsville area, scientists are still trying to determine how disruptive this visitor from halfway around the world really is.

Maybe it’s the word “invasive,” but the redclaws tend to be painted in the media as some sort of boogeyman hell-bent on usurping their smaller native counterpart (the “red swamp” crawfish) like something out of a 1950s B-movie. But like the redclaws’ favored habitat of the Valley’s recetas (wetlands) and ponds, the truth is somewhat murkier.

For one thing, evidence suggests the redclaws are either unwilling or unable to thrive anywhere water temperatures dip much below 80 degrees. That could substantially limit their range, said Dr. Archis Grubh, an invertebrate biologist with Texas Parks and Wildlife’s inland fisheries division.

“If it gets cold then [the redclaw] cannot survive, or it’s not favorable for it,” said.

Last year about this time, Grubh and his team had just begun a two-year study of the Australian redclaws in collaboration with researchers from the University of Texas at Tyler. Focusing on a 30-mile radius around Brownsville, their early efforts have concentrated on measuring the animals’ range and “abundance,” or the number of redclaws recovered in their nets and minnow traps.

Now, halfway through the study, Grubh said researchers had found redclaws as far as Los Fresnos, about 17 miles north of Brownsville. They had also surprised themselves by recovering between 40 and 50 redclaws during their November research trip. Previous outings had only recovered a handful at a time, so Grubh still wasn’t quite sure what accounted for the significant jump in numbers.

“Maybe it’s a seasonal effect; maybe they’re hiding or going to different habitat areas,” he said. “They still have two more samplings that will be conducted in the next few months. After that, we’ll have a stronger hold on what’s going on.”

Other aspects of the redclaws’ impact on their environment, such as how their healthy appetite for decaying vegetation and other organic matter affects other species in the area, also have yet to be studied.

“I’d definitely like to see if there is some behavioral interaction between the Redclaw and the native crayfish species, or even with other fish, to see how it’s affected them,” Grubh said. “We’d like to get an idea of its abundance. Right now we’re just trying to figure out how far this species has spread, but we’d like to know how dense these numbers are.”

I’ve mentioned these critters before. Not discussed in this story: whether or not they’re good eatin’. As noted in my first entry, the answer to that is Yes. The likely manner in which this Aussie animal wound up in South Texas is some number of people dumping their aquariums in the Gulf. This is why we can’t have nice things. Be that as it may, at least this invasive species appears to be somewhat limited in its ability to disrupt the natives; we didn’t have a good handle on that in 2022, when we were first becoming aware of them. Let’s hope that further study confirms that. It would also be nice if they could clarify whether these things should have “crawfish” or “crayfish” as part of their official names.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on More on the Australian redclaw crayfish

Weekend link dump for April 13

“Researchers have proposed studying sex in space, but so far, the only documented case is a pornographic science-fiction film called The Uranus Experiment. If NASA wasn’t so uptight, I could provide more specifics. But as an insider, I’m now convinced it’s true: They do have sex on the Space Station. Just don’t expect NASA to ever admit it.”

“Five years after the height of COVID, nurses are still fighting for their rights”.

“We’d be quiet too if we were them because it’s such a humiliating self own. Maybe, like many other pundits, they thought that Trump was just bluffing about tariffs. Maybe they thought they could push him in a direction that was purely beneficial to their industry. He might still back down. But at least for now, what the accelerationists did here by backing Trump is not just accidentally shoot themselves in the foot, but methodically blow off each of their toes with a .50 caliber sniper rifle.”

What sea turtle tears may be able to tell us about the earth’s magnetic field.

“Sports betting seems to be following a classic American formula: Introduce a product to the marketplace, then, after the negative consequences become evident, call the government in to clean up the mess and put safeguards in place for the future. But this formula might not work for sports betting. The genie may simply be too far out of the bottle to be easily put back inside.”

Leave The Leftovers alone! (Update: They are. Good.)

The physics of the torpedo bat. Math-heavy but quite accessible.

RIP, Jay North, former child actor best known for his role as the titular character in Dennis the Menace.

The White House, or The White Lotus? Genuinely hard to tell.

“Trump’s decision to single-handedly hobble the world economy and immiserate tens of millions of Americans has presented his fellow Republicans with a stark choice. Do they continue to kiss his orange butt and slavishly nod along to every nonsensical whim of their idiot Golfer King as he leads them into a recession and almost certain electoral apocalypse? Or do they defy him, splitting the party and opening themselves to a primary challenge … and possible electoral apocalypse?”

““[M]oral incongruence around pornography use is consistently the best predictor of the belief one is experiencing pornography-related problems or dysregulation, and comparisons of aggregate effects reveal that it is consistently a much better predictor than pornography use itself”.

“You can think of this as the sin-tax problem of tariffs. You can levy a tax on cigarettes as a way to discourage people from smoking. Or you can levy a tax on cigarettes to create a reliable, long-term source of revenue. But you can’t do both at the same time.”

“A recent study of the nation’s 200 most populous cities ranked Houston ninth in the United States for naked gardening.” Saturday, May 6, is international World Naked Gardening Day, if you want to test that out.

RIP, Octavio Dotel, former MLB pitcher who played five seasons with the Astros and won a World Series with the St. Louis Cardinals.

Trump’s tariffs will make you a man again. Or something like that.

“So it’s those two groups all the way down. But it originates with no theory beyond a love of tariffs, a deep obsession with trade deficits and a zero-sum theory of dominating and dominated. And it’s all turbocharged by profound governing failure by which the entire country is now hostage to the degenerate will of a single man.”

“The world used clean power sources to meet more than 40% of its electricity demand last year for the first time since the 1940s, figures show.”

“In these simple culture-war arguments, conservatives found a place of easier agreement. It may be hard, with the various factions of this MAGA movement, for there to be any kind of unified stance on a historically chaotic economic policy. But on the topic of gender, there was no conflict: A manly America, in this MAGA vision, is a healthy America. In gender politics, at least, they were able to make the unfamiliar familiar.”

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekend link dump for April 13

Taking from Harris to give to Houston

This story from Tuesday perplexed me a little at first.

Harris County would have to turn over tens of millions in toll road dollars to the city of Houston for use on public safety and emergency services under a bill before the Texas Senate.

Senate Bill 2722 by Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, is scheduled for a hearing on Wednesday.

“I filed the bill so that we could have more transparent use of excess funds,” Bettencourt said Wednesday. “It’s important to recognize that if we are going to have excess toll road revenue that it should be shared with the big cities within the county.”

HCTRA generates upwards of $1 billion dollars a year for the county, according to a May 2024 credit opinion by Moody’s.

Under Bettencourt’s bill, toll road revenues would be restricted to building, operating and maintaining the county’s toll road system or paying down debt associated with the system.

The county for years has used hundreds of millions of dollars in so-called excess HCTRA revenues – funding above operation and debt costs – to fund road projects that connect to the toll road system in some way. Commissioners Court has used some of that money for other purposes in recent years, including more trailways and bikeways and road maintenance.

Bettencourt’s bill would require the county to give 30 percent of that revenue to “the municipality that contains more than 40 percent of the number of lane miles” — which is the city of Houston. The remaining 70 percent would go back to the county and “only be used on roads owned and maintained by the county.”

The revenue that Houston would get could only be used to reimburse costs “related to law enforcement and other emergency services during accidents and other disasters affecting a project of the county,” according to the bill.

My first thought was that maybe Mayor Whitmire had found a way to get the Legislature to help him out with balancing the budget. It would be quite ironic if that assistance came at the expense of Harris County. But there were no quotes in the story from anyone connected with the city, and the restrictions on the way the revenue could be used makes it sound a lot smaller than at first appearance. Like I said, it was puzzling.

Friday’s Chron story helped shed a little light.

Harris County officials and other advocates, including environmentalists and public transit experts, accused lawmakers of intervening to block planned county projects like nature trails and bike paths – which Bettencourt and Houston Mayor John Whitmire have publicly opposed.

“This entire bill is a money grab for the city of Houston,” said Jay Blazek Crossley, the executive director of the Farm & City, a statewide sustainability nonprofit. “This would just force one government that owns a facility and manages [its] money to just give that money to a different government for police.”

Harris County Commissioner Adrian Garcia, who represents Precinct 2, said in an interview that the county would happily reimburse the city for any police or fire costs it incurs on the toll roads.

“If this is about the city covering costs on the toll road, please send us the bill,” he said.

According to an analysis by Garcia’s office, the vast majority of incidents on toll roads are handled by county constables — only 1,854 out of 113,729 calls last year were answered by city-employed first responders.

In the hearing Wednesday, Houston Police Chief J. Noe Diaz testified that the police and fire departments had responded to 6,500 calls on the toll roads between 2022 and 2024.

That’s still a fraction of the more than 300,000 calls constables received during the same time period, according to data shared by Houston city council member Abbie Kamim in a meeting on Wednesday.

State Sen. Nathan Johnson, a Dallas Democrat, expressed concern over the precedent such a law would set.

“Do we have any other instance in Texas history where we are, as a state, stepping in and statutorily diverting the revenue of an authority, be it a toll road, a port … to a municipality for its general purposes?” he asked during the Senate hearing.

“I’m not advised on that,” Bettencourt responded. “I do know this is a unique fact pattern because we don’t have any other toll road authority with $600 million of excess tolls.”

HCTRA’s executive director Roberto Treviño disputed that figure. Last year, the toll road authority’s surplus revenue was $193 million, Trevino told Hearst Newspapers.

Current state law allows for the toll authority’s surplus revenue to be spent on “a transportation project, highway project, or air quality project.”

By requiring that the county spend excess toll revenue exclusively on county roads, Bettencourt’s bill would upend the authority’s plans to invest in transportation options for non-drivers.

Among other things, that would screw the neighborhoods that are directly affected vy the proposed Hardy Toll Road extension, as noted by the story. Not that Paul Bettencourt cares about any of them. Given the numbers – and I don’t see anything in the text of the bill to say what happens to the rest of that 30% once all of the city’s “law enforcement and other emergency services” costs have been reimbursed – I think this is more about animus to Harris County and any spending that isn’t on roads than helping out Houston. Maybe Bettencourt thinks he’s doing Whitmire a solid along the way, I can’t rule that out, but it’s always open season on Harris County and anyone who doesn’t drive. That’s my interpretation, at least for now.

The bill had its hearing on Wednesday and was left pending in committee, so who knows if it will advance any further. We’re beginning to get into the busy part of the legislative calendar, and most bills don’t make it anywhere close to the finish line. The main point here is at even if you just take Bettencourt at his word, the fiscal effect for the city would likely be pretty minimal. And as Commissioner Garcia notes, if the city has a complaint about how much they spend on HPD and/or HFD responding to incidents on the toll roads, the city can present its case to the county and ask for reimbursement directly. The fact that as far as I know this hasn’t been an issue before says a lot.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Taking the package

The city’s workforce is voluntarily shrinking.

Mayor John Whitmire

More than 700 city of Houston employees are set to retire May 1 after accepting voluntary buyouts, city officials said Thursday.

Many of the positions will have to be backfilled, but Whitmire administration officials said they anticipate saving more than $26 million annually in general fund dollars – and $48 million total – from the reduced staff.

Those savings could balloon up to $189 million if all 3,000 civilian employees eligible for retirement accept the buyouts, according to a presentation from the mayor’s deputy chief of staff and finance director.

That would not be enough to cover the projected $330 million budget shortfall in the fiscal year that begins July 1, but it will help directors restructure their departments ahead of budget hearings, said Steven David, the mayor’s deputy chief of staff.

The city normally sees about 400 retirements a year, David said.

“The expectation is we are going to have to do drastic changes in the way we run the city,” David told City Council members at a Thursday committee meeting.

[…]

Of the eligible employees, 15 percent are supervisors. David said a main concern of department directors has been a disruption of city services, but the extended time for the buyout will allow them to plan accordingly.

See here for some more on the buyout plan, which has a deadline of April 28. I feel confident saying that not all of the eligible employees will accept the package. And it’s just as well, because the city will have to backfill most if not all of those roles, with new employees who will have lower salaries. (The average savings, based on 700 retirees and a net $26 million in cost reduction, is about $37K per employee.) We’ll see what effect this has on city services.

Note that even if all eligible employees did take the golden handshake, the city still has a deficit of well over $100 million. This is again why I say that we cannot get out of this without raising revenue – there just isn’t enough to cut, not with police and fire not only off the table but a source of increased expenses. And this early retirement package is itself a one-time solution – you’re not going to get anything like this reduction again if it’s offered, and sooner or later you run out of people who could take it. All roads eventually lead to raising or removing the revenue cap.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Taking the package

Who wants a piece of Minute Maid Park?

Parts of the old signage could be yours if you act soon.

Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

The “Minute Maid” signs from the Houston Astros’ formerly-titled Minute Maid Park are being auctioned off online.

Shall we start the bidding at $500?

Yes, that’s correct: the letters “Mi,” “nu,” “te,” “M”, “ai”, and “d” have a starting asking price of $500. However, the signs that previously adorned the outside of Daikin Park are not the most expensive of the group.

The Astros announced a change in their ballpark’s title sponsor from Minute Maid to Daikin back in November, bringing an end to their 22-year partnership. During that time, the Astros reached seven consecutive American League Championship Series, made four World Series appearances, and won two of them. For fans in Houston, the sponsorship represented a storied era in Astros’ history and even gave the park its nickname, “The Juice Box.” Even the train in left field carried a car full of oranges.

However, the club started removing the signage in February, replacing it with “Daikin,” an air conditioning company. The train now commemorates the park’s 25th anniversary and includes a car filled with baseballs in the back.

An online auction now features the Minute Maid Park signage from every corner of the park. As of Wednesday, April 9, the highest bid has been for the “Minute Maid Park” sign that hung at the Home Plate South Gate entrance, which reached $1,900.

As of Wednesday, a lot of the letter combinations had not been bid on, so they were still an affordable $500. You ever go to a charity event that included a silent auction and found yourself bidding on something you didn’t initially want but saw that no one had bid anything well into the event and you figured what the heck, for the minimum bid it’s worth it? This could be your chance here. If you still regret missing out on Enron memorabilia, make your move now.

Posted in Baseball | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Who wants a piece of Minute Maid Park?

Measles update: Time for another moment of perspective

Here are the Friday numbers.

The measles outbreak centered in the South Plains region of Texas grew to 541 cases across the state on Friday, according to health officials.

The Texas Department of State Health Services reported that 56 have been hospitalized for treatment since the outbreak began in late January. Two children, an 8-year-old girl and a 6-year-old girl, have died after contracting the virus.

Nearly seven in 10 cases have been in children younger than age 18, and nearly 98% of cases have been in individuals who have not received the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, or whose vaccination status is unknown. The children who died had not been vaccinated, and they did not have any underlying medical conditions, the DSHS said.

Public health officials estimate that fewer than 30 individuals who have contracted measles — roughly 5% of all cases — are actively infectious. An individual may be infectious up to four days before a rash appears and up to four days after it’s gone.

The Texas outbreak has also spread to New Mexico, which reported 58 cases on Friday, and Oklahoma, which reported 12 cases. New Mexico has reported one suspected measles death, an unvaccinated adult who tested positive for the virus after dying.

The total of 541 cases is an increase of 36 since the last DSHS update on Tuesday.

Three-quarters of the new cases are in Gaines County, which continues to see the lion’s share of cases associated with the outbreak. The small county along the New Mexico border reported 27 new cases on Friday, and has now seen a total of 355 cases during the outbreak.

El Paso County reported three new cases, the first that have been seen in the state’s westernmost county. Two new cases were reported in Lubbock County, which has now seen 36 during the outbreak.

Cochran, Dawson, Terry and Yoakum counties each reported one new case.

The DSHS said there is ongoing measles transmission in 10 counties across the state: Cochran, Dallam, Dawson, Gaines, Garza, Lynn, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

Of the 541 cases in Texas, 171 have been in children younger than 5 years old and 203 have been in children and teens between 5 and 17, according to the DSHS.

Only 11 cases have been in people who received at least one dose of MMR vaccine prior to an infection.

Texas has reported a total of seven measles cases in 2025 that are not connected to the South Plains outbreak, including four in Harris County and one in Fort Bend County. Most of those cases are associated with international travel, according to the DSHS.

Here’s Kansas:

As of Wednesday, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment is reporting 32 positive cases of measles, up nearly 40% from two weeks ago when there were only 23 confirmed cases, according to the 2025 Kansas Measles Outbreak Dashboard.

The measles outbreak is concentrated in the southwestern part of Kansas, with the disease spreading to two additional counties over the past two weeks. Measles cases have now been reported in Finney, Ford, Grant, Gray, Haskell, Kiowa, Morton and Stevens counties.

The KDHE has previously said the confirmed cases in Kansas have a possible link to outbreaks in Texas and New Mexico.

The vast majority of cases, 26, involve children and teens. There have been 10 cases reported in children 4 years old and younger, and 16 between the ages of 5 and 17. The remaining six cases involving patients 18 and older.

Unvaccinated patients — 27 — account for the majority of the cases. Meanwhile, there is one case involving a patient not appropriately vaccinated for their age, two patients whose vaccinated status was being verified and one where the status was unable to be verified. Only one patient had been appropriately vaccinated for their age, according to the health department. So far there has been one hospitalization and no deaths.

Here’s Ohio.

The Ohio Department of Health confirmed 20 measles cases in the state as of Thursday: 11 in Ashtabula County near Cleveland, seven in Knox County and one each in Allen and Holmes counties.

Ohio is not including non-residents in its count, a state health department spokesperson told The Associated Press. The Knox County outbreak in east-central Ohio has infected a total 14 people, according to a news release from the county health department, but seven of them do not live in Ohio. A measles outbreak in central Ohio sickened 85 in 2022.

The outbreak in Ashtabula County started with an unvaccinated adult who had interacted with someone who had traveled internationally.

Indiana is also now reporting measles cases, but they appear to be isolated.

Anyway, I promised you a moment of perspective, and here it is. As noted in that Chron story, there have been 355 cases reported from Gaines County, where this all began. Gaines County has a population of 22,553, which makes those 355 infections about one and a half percent of the total number of people there. If one and a half percent of Harris County’s population had gotten the measles, it would represent about 75,000 people. Think about that for a minute.

And then think about it some more when you read this.

As measles tears through West Texas — infecting hundreds, hospitalizing dozens and claiming the lives of two children — some lawmakers in Austin are pushing bills to roll back vaccine requirements and expand access to exemptions under the banner of “choice.”

Measles, a highly contagious disease that was declared eliminated from the U.S. in 2000, has swept through West Texas communities with lower-than-average vaccination rates, turning Texas into the epicenter of a possible national epidemic with 505 cases identified since late January, including 57 hospitalizations and two deaths.

Two shots of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, which has been administered for decades, is the safest and most effective way to build immunity to the virus.

Still, Texas lawmakers have introduced bills to weaken vaccine mandates and make it easier for parents to obtain exemptions for their children — and there’s little indication that the state’s worst outbreak in three decades has changed their thinking.

Read the rest if you can stand it. This outbreak isn’t slowing down, and as vaccination remains the only defense against it, more vaccine clinics are being forced to close because of federal funding cuts, all of which are happening under the lying brain worm in charge. This is the world we live in today. What are we going to do about that?

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Measles update: Time for another moment of perspective

Harris County sues over refugee grant funds

Keep on litigating, the reasons to do so aren’t going to run short anytime soon.

Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee is suing the Trump administration after it froze a more-than-$10 million grant for the county’s Refugee Health Services Program.

Menefee announced the move during a Wednesday news conference alongside Harris County Precinct 4 Commissioner Lesley Briones. The grant, which allocated $10.5 million to Harris County Public Health’s Refugee Health Services Program, was awarded in October under the Biden administration and frozen by the Trump administration in February.

“We are a country that honors the rule of law and honors its commitments,” Briones said. “These individuals are legally in our country seeking protection … They’ve been approved by Congress, and they are waiting health screenings, immunizations, and now this federal funding is frozen. That is not right, that is not just, that is not legal, and that is un-American.”

Briones, who referred to Gulfton as the “modern-day Ellis Island,” said the county’s refugee health program is the largest in the state.

The program operates out of Precinct 4, served 17,000 patients and administered 36,000 vaccines in 2024, according to a news release sent ahead of the announcement. President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January halting the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, but around 3,000 refugees are still awaiting care through Harris County Public Health, Menefee said.

The Refugee Health Services Program has 30 employees who provide “trauma-informed” care for refugees who fled war-torn countries or persecution, including people from Ukraine, Cuba, Afghanistan and Venezuela, Menefee said. Despite the freeze, Menefee said the county has continued providing services, including vaccinations and preventive care, and has incurred $1.25 million in expenses that have not been reimbursed.

“If this funding stays frozen, these people will be out of work and two of our clinics may have to be shut down,” Menefee said. “I want to be clear, this is not some new or radical program that the Trump administration has responded to, this has been a part of U.S. policy since World War II.”

No reason not to fight them on all of these things. May not win, especially if it makes it to SCOTUS, but it’s still worth the effort and it’s the right thing to do.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Harris County sues over refugee grant funds

On weather balloons

Another possibly bad omen for the hurricane season.

Due to staffing constraints, as a result of recent budget cuts and retirements, the National Weather Service has announced a series of suspensions involving weather balloon launches in recent weeks.

On February 27, it was announced that balloon launches would be suspended entirely at Kotzebue, Alaska due to staffing shortages. In early March, Albany, NY and Gray, Maine announced periodic disruptions in launches. Since March 7th, it appears that Gray has not missed any balloon launches through Saturday. Albany, however, has missed 14 of them, all during the morning launch cycle (12z).

The kicker came on Thursday afternoon when it was announced that all balloon launches would be suspended in Omaha, NE and Rapid City, SD due to staffing shortages. Additionally, the balloon launches in Aberdeen, SD, Grand Junction, CO, Green Bay, WI, Gaylord, MI, North Platte, NE, and Riverton, WY would be reduced to once a day from twice a day.

[…]

But in general, satellites cannot yet replace weather balloons. They merely act to improve upon what weather balloons do. A study done in the middle part of the last decade found that wind observations improved rainfall forecasts by 30 percent. The one tool at that time that made the biggest difference in improving the forecast were radiosondes. Has this changed since then? Yes, almost certainly. Our satellites have better resolution, are capable of getting more data, and send data back more frequently. So certainly it’s improved some. But enough? That’s unclear.

An analysis done more recently on the value of dropsondes (the opposite of balloon launches; this time the sensor is dropped from an aircraft instead of launched from the ground) in forecasting west coast atmospheric rivers showed a marked improvement in forecasts when those targeted drops occur. Another study in 2017 showed that aircraft observations actually did a good job filling gaps in the upper air data network. Even with aircraft observations, there were mixed studies done in the wake of the COVID-19 reduction in air travel that suggested no impact could be detected above usual forecast error noise or that there was some regional degradation in model performance.

[…]

In reality, the verdict in all this is to be determined, particularly statistically. Will it make a meaningful statistical difference in model accuracy? Over time, yes probably, but not in ways that most people will notice day to day.

However, based on 20 years of experience and a number of conversations about this with others in the field, there are some very real, very serious concerns beyond statistics. One thing is that the suspended weather balloon launches are occurring in relatively important areas for weather impacts downstream. A missed weather balloon launch in Omaha or Albany won’t impact the forecast in California. But what if a hurricane is coming? What if a severe weather event is coming? You’ll definitely see impacts to forecast quality during major, impactful events. At the very least, these launch suspensions will increase the noise to signal ratio with respect to forecasts.

In other words, there may be situations where you have a severe weather event expected to kickstart in one place but the lack of knowing the precise location of an upper air disturbance in the Rockies thanks to a suspended launch from Grand Junction, CO will lead to those storms forming 50 miles farther east than expected. In other words, losing this data increases the risk profile for more people in terms of knowing about weather, particularly high impact weather.

There’s more, so read the rest and remember that we’re expecting a busy hurricane season. We’re much better at weather forecasting now, especially for big weather events, because we have access to more data. The effect of these cuts is to reduce the amount of data we have, with predictable results. This is one of those situations where maybe nothing bad happens this year or for the next few years, but the odds of something bad happening due to degraded data have increased, and will eventually catch up to us. When that happens, who knows how bad it will be. The scope of the next disaster is growing.

Posted in National news, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on On weather balloons

A brief reminder about the possible recall effort

Whatever you or I may think, Mayor Whitmire is not unpopular.

Mayor John Whitmire

A recent survey from the University of Houston’s Hobby School of Public Affairs found that while most Houstonians believe both the city and country are going in the wrong direction, most also approve of Mayor John Whitmire and County Judge Lina Hidalgo’s performance in their respective positions.

The survey, released early Thursday, included responses from around 1,400 Houstonians with a 2.62% margin of error.

Around 59% of surveyed residents said Whitmire was doing a good job as mayor, but 41% begged to differ. Hidalgo was given a thumbs up by 55% of those surveyed, and a thumbs down by 45%.

Those who vote Republican were more likely to think Whitmire was doing a good job than Democrats. He got a gold star from 71% of surveyed Republicans and 56% of surveyed Democrats. Hidalgo saw an 80% approval rate among Democrats and a meager 13% approval rate from Republicans.

The poll’s landing page is here and the poll data is here. I’m not particularly interested in scrutinizing it, but knock yourself out. My point is simply this: Any recall effort has two significant obstacles to overcome. One is the large number of signatures needed in a thirty-day span. We’ve already discussed that. The other is that both the recall supporters and the preferred candidate that emerges would have to do a lot of work to overcome the fact that for the most part, people are more or less fine with Mayor Whitmire. There’s definitely a vocal and not insignificant community that strongly dislikes him, but that is not a broadly held sentiment at this time. One poll never means all that much, but if he really were in danger, any reasonable poll would show some signs of it. This ain’t that.

Now of course the point of a recall effort is to convince people that they need to change horses right away. That’s a lot easier to do with someone who is already widely disliked, but it is possible to move public opinion. That takes a lot of money and it often takes some time. Whitmire himself has a lot of money and would surely be able to raise more, so that’s another obstacle. It would probably be best from a strategic perspective to be out there with a visible anti-Whitmire message even before the recall petitions hit the streets, but again that takes money and some kind of existing organization. So far there’s nothing happening and no indication that the resources are in place for there to be anything.

I’m not saying a strong recall effort couldn’t be mounted. I am saying there’s a lot of work to be done before one could reasonably even think about it, and it wouldn’t be easy once you reach that point. Be realistic about the landscape, that’s all I’m saying.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

More from Maria Rojas’ attorney

Good stuff from the Press.

During a March 27 hearing, Waller County District Judge Gary Chaney granted an injunction declaring that a network of three Houston-area clinics must remain temporarily closed. Marc Hearron, senior counsel for the Center for Reproductive Rights and a civil attorney for Rojas, stopped short of calling the court proceedings a dog and pony show but clearly thinks the case is flawed.

The civil complaint sought to keep the clinics closed, so Hearron was in court to challenge that. The attorney was surprised, however, to see Rojas in the Waller courtroom. She invoked her Fifth Amendment rights when questioned and Hearron declined to comment on his legal advice but said he was able to speak with Rojas privately.

“We had not asked for Rojas to be present at the hearing,” he said. “We were not planning to call her to testify. The state had not subpoenaed her to be present.”

It appears that Waller County authorities transported Rojas to the courtroom on March 27 because she was already in custody. At the time of the hearing, Rojas had been in jail for 10 days pending the posting of a massive $1 million bond “even though the state had not filed criminal charges against her and still has not filed criminal charges against her,” Hearron said.

Rojas posted bond the day before the hearing butt wasn’t immediately released because the courts did not arrange for her ankle monitor, Hearron said. She was released after the March 27 hearing with the tracking device.

Maria Rojas is a strong and resilient person and a licensed healthcare provider, Hearron said.

“She really cares for the people that she provides healthcare to,” he said. “She was a doctor in Peru, but in the United States, she was a licensed midwife before the state of Texas temporarily revoked her license as a result of this nonsense. She has these clinics, and the clinics primarily serve uninsured Spanish-speaking populations. Nothing in the state’s evidence showed any unlawful activity going on at these clinics.”

What happens next is up to the judge, Hearron said, but the more pressing matter is what happens to the families who were seeking healthcare at Rojas’ clinics. Clínica Waller Latinoamericana and its affiliates in Cypress and Spring are shuttered for the foreseeable future. Patients who, for example, had blood drawn and were waiting on results may have to find care elsewhere, Hearron said.

“I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the first person that Ken Paxton goes after and accuses of violating the abortion ban in the state of Texas is someone who is providing midwifery — not traditional OBGYN care — to primarily Spanish-speaking uninsured … Look, they tried to make a big deal out of the fact that they found cash and that they took cash for payments. Yeah, these were uninsured people who were going in and getting care. That’s how those populations pay for medical services,” Hearron said.

Court documents allege that Rojas was pretending to be a doctor and using untrained employees to perform abortions for cash, but it’s unclear how the criminal case will proceed or if it will proceed. Rojas was held on an arrest warrant rather than a criminal complaint, which lawyers say is unusual. She has not been indicted by a grand jury and the state has not turned over its discovery related to the criminal charges.

“If she hasn’t been charged yet, why does she have an ankle monitor?” Hearron said. “I don’t know exactly how these preposterous allegations in this case came up but it does appear that Paxton and his office saw the word abortion and salivated at the possibility of going after someone. This seems to be a political stunt without any real evidence. This is all based on hearsay upon hearsay and conjecture and these wild, irresponsible conclusions that they have jumped to without the type of thorough investigation that you would see if you were really interested in stopping supposedly unlawful abortions … My conclusion from all of that is that this is a political stunt designed to raise Ken Paxton’s political bona fides among the anti-abortion electorate. It’s also designed to scare people who are providing necessary healthcare to low-income populations.”

See here, here, and here for the background. The biggest red flag is that there still haven’t been any formal charges filed in this case. You’d think Ken Paxton would be trampling over people in a rush to get charges filed, but not if there’s nothing to them and certainly not if he has to show that he has no real evidence of any crimes. I have to assume that at some point Rojas’ attorneys will try to force this issue. The politics of this are clear enough – it’s hardly a coincidence that the arrest of Maria Rojas came just a short time before Paxton’s Senate campaign announcement – but sooner or later he’s going to have to play his cards.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Dire wolves

Colossal Biosciences is at it again.

Provided by Colossal Biosciences

Three genetically engineered wolves that may resemble extinct dire wolves are trotting, sleeping and howling in an undisclosed secure location in the U.S., according to the company that aims to bring back lost species.

The wolf pups, which range in age from three to six months old, have long white hair, muscular jaws and already weigh in at around 80 pounds — on track to reach 140 pounds at maturity, researchers at Colossal Biosciences reported Monday.

Dire wolves, which went extinct more than 10,000 years old, are much larger than gray wolves, their closest living relatives today.

Independent scientists said this latest effort doesn’t mean dire wolves are coming back to North American grasslands any time soon.

“All you can do now is make something look superficially like something else”— not fully revive extinct species, said Vincent Lynch, a biologist at the University at Buffalo who was not involved in the research.

Colossal scientists learned about specific traits that dire wolves possessed by examining ancient DNA from fossils. The researchers studied a 13,000 year-old dire wolf tooth unearthed in Ohio and a 72,000 year-old skull fragment found in Idaho, both part of natural history museum collections.

Then the scientists took blood cells from a living gray wolf and used CRISPR to genetically modify them in 20 different sites, said Colossal’s chief scientist Beth Shapiro. They transferred that genetic material to an egg cell from a domestic dog. When ready, embryos were transferred to surrogates, also domestic dogs, and 62 days later the genetically engineered pups were born.

Colossal has previously announced similar projects to genetically alter cells from living species to create animals resembling extinct woolly mammoths, dodos and others.

Though the pups may physically resemble young dire wolves, “what they will probably never learn is the finishing move of how to kill a giant elk or a big deer,” because they won’t have opportunities to watch and learn from wild dire wolf parents, said Colossal’s chief animal care expert Matt James.

Colossal also reported today that it had cloned four red wolves using blood drawn from wild wolves of the southeastern U.S.’s critically endangered red wolf population. The aim is to bring more genetic diversity into the small population of captive red wolves, which scientists are using to breed and help save the species.

I’ve had plenty to say about Colossal Biosciences, who last month announced the wooly mouse, its intermediate step on the way to de-extincting the wooly mammoth. This is the first I’ve heard of their dire wolf project, which were probably easier to create than some of the other species they have in mind. We’ll see how they do in the real world. Just, next time, pick better names for them. USA Today and the Chron have more, and Boing Boing has a contrarian view.

Posted in Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Paxton officially running against Cornyn

The campaign no one asked for.

Still a crook any way you look

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Tuesday he will challenge U.S. Sen. John Cornyn in next year’s midterm elections, setting up a barnburner clash of two Republican titans that is poised to reverberate across state and national politics.

The contest, teased by Paxton for months, promises to be among the most heated and expensive Republican primaries in the country and in recent Texas history. It also marks the latest flashpoint in a power struggle between the Texas GOP’s hardline, socially conservative wing — which views Paxton as a standard-bearer — and the Cornyn-aligned, business-minded Republican old guard.

Appearing on Fox News host Laura Ingraham’s show, Paxton said it was “time for a change in Texas” as he announced his Senate bid and blasted Cornyn’s “lack of production” over his 22 years in the upper chamber.

“We have another great U.S. senator, Ted Cruz, and it’s time we have another great senator that will actually stand up and fight for Republican values, fight for the values of the people of Texas, and also support Donald Trump in the areas that he’s focused on in a very significant way,” Paxton said. “And that’s what I plan on doing.”

Paxton’s candidacy poses the most serious threat to Cornyn’s political career in decades. It would mark a watershed moment in the Texas GOP’s factional struggle if Paxton — not long removed from an array of career-threatening legal battles and impeachment by his own party — managed to topple Cornyn, a mainstay of Texas politics who had an early hand in the state’s Republican takeover and reached the upper rungs of Senate GOP leadership.

Wasting no time framing himself as the outsider in the race, Paxton wrote on social media he was running to “take a sledgehammer to the D.C. establishment,” while calling for voters to “send John Cornyn packing.”

Okay sure, some people want this. Mostly, they’re the most fanatical of the Republican primary voters – the more MAGAfied you are, the more you also like Ken Paxton and the more likely you are to prefer him to John Cornyn. There’s nothing we can do about that. But that race is going to be fought mostly on the turf of who is the biggest lickspittle sycophant to Donald Trump, and there is something we can do about that.

Mostly, we – and by “we” I mean “the Democratic nominee for Senate”, whether that is Colin Allred or somebody else – can hammer on the need for there to be someone in statewide office who is capable of standing up to Trump. Specifically, someone who is capable of standing up to Trump on the issue of tariffs, which are broadly unpopular and even before the latest round started wrecking the economy were causing havoc for a lot of pro-Trump constituencies, from the oil patch to farmers to the business community in general. Even Ted Cruz doesn’t like the tariffs. But of course Cruz will never do anything other than grumble about them on his podcast. If you want someone who won’t be a bootlicker, you can’t vote for either Paxton, whose whole raison d’etre is Trump fealty, or Cornyn, who will have to demonstrate his Trump loyalty in this campaign.

That’s the argument. I believe it will peel off some votes if done well. Please remember, Ken Paxton has been the worst performer among Republicans in the last two elections. In both 2018 and 2022, he had the fewest votes and the lowest percentage among Republicans – yes, even lower than Ted Cruz in 2018, getting 50.57% to Cruz’s 50.89%. (His margin of victory was slightly larger than Cruz’s mostly because of a larger Libertarian vote in the AG race.) If 2026 is a good Democratic year – and please lord let it be so – then Paxton is the lowest hanging fruit, and either he or Cornyn will have this as a big potential liability.

Obviously a campaign can’t be just about one issue, and the candidate matters, and so on and so forth. I’m just saying this is a way in with voters who are not now on our side but who could be. And yes, we need to persuade some folks to switch teams, even if just for this one race. The tariffs – the absolutely incoherent rationales for them, the destruction they’ve already caused, the imperviousness of Trump and his minions to any argument or reason about them – provide both a strong issue and a way to expand on it to other matters of great importance that are illustrated by the tariff regime. You know, things like not wanting to be ruled by a dictator and stuff like that.

Of course there’s risk to this. Trump could back down, or make some “deals”, and in doing so blunt the disastrous economic effects of the tariffs. (He’s not going to back down, no matter what dodging and weaving he may do in the short term. He loves tariffs and has spouted them as his One Big Idea for decades.) Maybe Cornyn runs a more old-school Republican campaign, which among other things emphasizes more rational economic policies and his record of being business-friendly in more than name only, and wins on it. But so what? It’s not like there’s some tried-and-true Democratic playbook for winning statewide that we’d be throwing out to take this path.

Anyway, that’s my reaction to this announcement. Let them smear each other on the campaign trail for the next year, but let us see that as the opportunity that it is and start acting on it now. We have a salient issue and a clear message about it. We need to take it from there.

UPDATE: And like an hour after I drafted this Trump sort of paused the tariffs for 90 days so “negotiations” can begin. But prices are still going to increase across the board, and the sheer inchoate chaos of this all undermines the whole idea of “negotiating” anyway. Point being, the premise of my post still very much stands.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Can we make HPD more efficient?

You’d think that would be a thing we’d all want.

Mayor John Whitmire

Mayor John Whitmire has made clear he intends to boost salaries and benefits for Houston police officers in their new union contract, but those increases will not be tied to performance.

That means officers across all divisions can expect better pay and benefits regardless of whether crime goes up or response times slow down, clearance rates improve or traffic deaths increase.

Whitmire is pushing to increase officer pay and benefits even after a city-commissioned efficiency study concluded that fewer than half of HPD’s performance targets are being met and improving.

The study by accounting giant Ernst and Young recommended adding more performance measures to hold the department accountable for dollars spent.

Both the Whitmire administration and the Houston Police Officers Union, however, say tying police salaries to departmental performance would not be appropriate. Their focus, instead, is on making Houston police salaries comparable to those in Texas’ other big cities, in an effort to recruit and retain officers for a department they say is understaffed for a city this size.

[…]

So-called key performance indicators are included in the annual city budget to measure whether departments make progress toward their goals.

Among HPD’s performance indicators are goals to maintain its average response times for priority calls, reduce crime, and release a percentage of body cam footage of “critical incidents” within 30 days.

The auditors recommended adding metrics, including the number of civilian complaints per officer and rates of violent, property and hate crimes.

City officials told Ernst and Young it could not “tell the cops how to cop,” [deputy chief of staff Steven] David said, but the consultants still could help find ways to make department more efficient

Once performance metrics are set, they will need to be continuously monitored and adjusted, David said.

City Council approved a second contract with Ernst and Young last month for an additional $4 million to help create performance improvement measures for each individual department, including HPD, David said.

Houston Police Officers Union President Doug Griffith said he anticipates the union and city will finalize a draft of a new labor contract this month, but he did not have a problem with the city giving the police more performance goals.

“We’re working on the contract. It has nothing to do with the efficiency study,” Griffith said. “But like every department, no matter where you are or what job it is, there’s always ways to make it more efficient. We look forward to that happening here with our department, as well.”

HPD leadership and the Houston Finance Department, which is overseen by the mayor’s office, are responsible for determining the annual performance indicators. They are not bargained by the police union.

However, the timing of the union negotiations could be worked to the mayor’s advantage, said Daniel DiSalvo, a politics and labor union expert with The City College of New York. DiSalvo said Whitmire’s team could use the suggestions laid out in the efficiency report as a tool to justify increased wages.

DiSalvo gave the example of tying better police response times, which are almost always used as an indicator of success, with increased funding: if the city allots additional funds for more officers or better vehicles, response times may improve.

“The question would be, what performance metrics could actually translate into a work rule that would encourage better performance?” DiSalvo said. “The other way to put it is, think negatively, are there work rules that are in the existing contract that are actively weakening the department?”

We’re not “telling them how to cop”, we’re setting a goal. They can figure out how to achieve it. The challenge here is that whatever efficiencies we may find and the improvements we may be able to wring out of them, it can never translate into savings for the city, because the Republicans in the Legislature passed a law forbidding local governments from ever cutting law enforcement budgets. So whatever we agree to pony up here, we’re going to be stuck with it. Given that reality, the least we can do is make sure we’re getting our money’s worth.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

It’s hurricane prediction season

And it will be another busy one.

FrankRamspott/Getty Images

The 2025 hurricane season is shaping up to be one of the most intense in recent years, with forecasters at Colorado State University predicting an above-normal active season. A staggering 17 named storms are expected, with 9 hurricanes— four of those could intensify into major hurricanes, category 3 or higher. The forecast also calls for 85 named storm days, a sharp rise from the historical average.

“We anticipate an above-average probability for major hurricanes making landfall along the continental United States coastline and in the Caribbean. As with all hurricane seasons, coastal residents are reminded that it only takes one hurricane making landfall to make it an active season,” the report reads.

To put that in perspective, the historical average hurricane season sees just 14.4 named storms, 7.2 hurricanes, and only 3.2 major hurricanes, along with 69.4 named storm days.

According to the report, a “warmer than normal tropical Atlantic” could create optimal conditions for hurricanes to form and intensify.

“Sea surface temperatures in the eastern and central tropical Atlantic are warmer than normal, although not as warm as they were last year at this time,” forecasters said in the report.

The 2025 hurricane season is expected to have more hurricanes than the 1991-2020 average, according to the report.

“Thorough preparations should be made every season, regardless of predicted activity,” the report reads.

The report from the Colorado hurricane experts follows the predictions from AccuWeather that Texas could see a higher-than average risk of hurricane impact this hurricane season.

If it’s any consolation, last year’s forecast was for more activity than this year’s predicts. The Colorado State guys predicted 23 named storms last year. We know how that worked out. It just takes one, that’s for sure. Better hope ERCOT and CenterPoint are more prepared this time around. The Eyewall gets into the details if you want more.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on It’s hurricane prediction season

Texas blog roundup for the week of April 7

The Texas Progressive Alliance remains tariff-free as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of April 7

Measles update: Another needless death

We have to start with some bad news.

An 8-year-old girl with measles died Thursday morning, the second known measles-related death in an ongoing outbreak that has infected nearly 500 Texans since January. Her funeral was Sunday at a church in Seminole followed by a private burial.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., visited the West Texas town that has been the epicenter of the outbreak Sunday and was expected to meet with the family.

“My intention was to come down here quietly to console the families and to be with the community in their moment of grief,” Kennedy wrote on social media. He went on to describe the resources he deployed to Texas in March after another school-aged child died from measles, claiming that the “growth rates for new cases and hospitalizations have flattened” since Kennedy sent a team from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The state reported 59 new cases in three days last week.

The child who died Thursday, Daisy Hildebrand, was not vaccinated and had no known underlying health conditions, said a spokesperson for University Medical Center in Lubbock, where she had been hospitalized. She died from “measles pulmonary failure,” the Texas Department of State Health Services reported Sunday.

“This unfortunate event underscores the importance of vaccination,” Vice President of University Medical Center Aaron Davis said in a statement. “We encourage all individuals to stay current with their vaccinations to help protect themselves and the broader community.”

[…]

A CDC spokesperson said in an email that Kennedy’s visit to Texas on Sunday resulted in discussions with Texas state health officials to deploy a second CDC response team to West Texas to further assist with the state’s efforts to protect its residents against measles and its complications.

Dr. Manisha Patel, incident manager for the CDC, said their team arrived in Gaines County in March and left on April 1. A spokesperson for the CDC said in light of today’s news and Kennedy’s order to re-deploy, another team will be in the county.

“We’re learning a lot in Gaines County on how we can help other jurisdictions also prepare for measles in their states,” Patel said.

Patel said it’s important to go in with a sensitive approach when it comes to small, close-knit communities that are unvaccinated.

“MMR is the best way to protect yourself, your families, your communities against measles,” Patel said. “And, if you’re starting to get very sick from measles, not to delay care.”

Patel said for some communities, it’s important to find trusted messengers. In some cases, she said, the federal government might not be the best choice for that and it has to be someone in the community. To work around this, Patel said they’ve worked directly with state and local health departments to find who the trusted messengers are.

“Our role is making sure those trusted messengers have the materials and information they need,” Patel said. “So we translate, for example, materials into a German or Spanish or whatever the community needs.”

It feels a little weird to me to name the children who died – the first child was named in a paragraph I didn’t quote; this was the first time I had seen her name – but I suppose that information was already out there. I’ll get back to RFK Jr in a minute, but in the meantime, this third death (there was also an adult who died) has Your Local Epidemiologist pondering the overall case numbers.

Before this year, there had only been three measles deaths since 2000:

  • 2015: A 28-year-old immunocompromised woman in Washington was exposed in a clinic.
  • 2003: A 75-year-old traveler from California with pneumonia. The other was a 13-year-old immunocompromised child (post–bone marrow transplant) living between Illinois and Mexico.

Today’s situation is different. It’s younger, healthier kids. And it’s happening more often.

This raises a critical question: Are we seeing the full picture?

As of Saturday, there were 636 measles cases nationwide, 569 in the Panhandle outbreak alone, and 3 deaths. But that death toll doesn’t quite make sense.

  • Measles typically causes 1 to 3 deaths per 1,000 unvaccinated cases.
  • At that rate, 3 deaths would suggest somewhere between 1,000 and 3,000 more cases—not just 569.

This outbreak may be significantly underreported and the largest in decades. Other signs point in the same direction, including very sick hospitalized patients (reflecting delays in seeking care), and epidemiologists are encountering resistance to case investigations.

Of course, there’s another possibility: this could simply be a statistical anomaly. Three deaths among a few hundred cases isn’t impossible—it’s just extremely rare. We’ve seen similar situations before. In 1991, for example, an outbreak in Philadelphia caused 1,400 cases and 9 pediatric deaths. In that case, religious leaders discouraged medical care, relying on prayer instead.

But whether this is an undercount or an outlier, one thing is clear: we are in new, unsettling territory.

We probably won’t have a decent guess at that until after it’s all over. If we’re lucky.

Back to RFK Jr, and yeah, I know.

After visiting the epicenter of Texas’ growing measles outbreak, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, tweeted out praise for a pair of Lone Star State doctors with records of dispensing endorsing alternative treatments that contradict guidance from infectious disease experts.

Kennedy, one of the nation’s highest-profile vaccine skeptics, called both physicians “extraordinary healers,” even though one of the two was disciplined roughly 20 years ago by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners for ordering unnecessary tests and false diagnoses, according to state records.

[…]

Kennedy shared photos from the trip and lavished praised on the two doctors with the history of dispensing unconventional treatments. The HHS secretary commended Dr. Richard Bartlett and Dr. Ben Edwards, whom he said had “treated and healed some 300 measles-stricken Mennonite children using aerosolized budesonide and clarithromycin.”

Although medical researchers have explored aerosolized budesonide and clarithromycin as possible measles treatments, most health experts accept that there’s no “cure” for measles — only treatments that can mitigate the symptoms.

For his part, Bartlett was disciplined by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners in 2003 for ordering unnecessary diagnostic tests, improper management of a patient’s diabetes and “questionably diagnosing” another patient with bronchitis despite having normal lung function, according to state records obtained by the Current.

Bartlett also touted unproved steroid treatments as a cure for COVID-19, according to TK.

Meanwhile, Edwards has a history of criticizing the measles vaccine, including proclaiming in a podcast that the Texas outbreak was “God’s version of measles immunization,” the Washington Post reports.

I’ve mentioned Ben Edwards before; Richard Bartlett is a new name to me. I’m sure you can surmise what I think of them. By the way, if you click over to that article, you can see the tweet in which RFK Jr poses for pictures with the families of the two dead girls, and names them. I don’t know if that makes him the source of that information, but there it is anyway.

That said, more people are getting their MMR vaccines now.

More than 218,000 Texans got the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine during the first three months of 2025, according to data from the state’s Department of State Health Services. That total is about 16% higher than the number of Texans who received the shot during the same timeframe last year.

The most notable increase has been in the South Plains area, which has seen a 60% rise this year compared to the same period in 2024, according to the data. Vaccinations are also up 13% in the public health region that includes Houston.

Public health experts said the increases have been encouraging amid an outbreak that has grown to more than 500 cases in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma. But vaccination rates in many Texas communities still fall short of the threshold of 95% vaccination coverage that is needed to achieve herd immunity, which prevents widespread outbreaks.

“It’s still a struggle,” Katherine Wells, the director of public health for the city of Lubbock, said of the efforts to improve vaccination rates. “It’s definitely following the news cycle. When there’s a local story about an exposure or sick kids, I think more people come to get vaccinated.”

Lubbock Public Health set up a drive-up MMR vaccine clinic to offer shots that is serving 20 to 30 people on an average day. Wells estimated that half the traffic to the clinic has been individuals who were recently exposed to the virus; the vaccine may provide some protection or lessen the severity of illness if it’s administered within 72 hours of an exposure, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Vaccinating healthy individuals before they are exposed has been trickier, Wells said. Public health officials have been stressing that one dose of the MMR vaccine is 93% effective at preventing an infection, and two doses are 97% effective.

The Immunization Partnership, a Houston-based nonprofit, has been working with school districts, day cares, pediatricians and public health clinics to improve vaccination rates in the South Plains region and elsewhere. Demand has not been high enough to contain the outbreak, said Terri Burke, the nonprofit’s executive director.

“I don’t think we’re making the headway we ought to ought to be making,” she said.

More Texas residents have been seeking out the MMR vaccine as the outbreak continues to spread. The number of shots administered across the state between Jan. 1 and March 31 was the highest during that timeframe in the last six years, according to DSHS data.

The DSHS noted that the data is not comprehensive, because Texas residents must opt-in to share their vaccination status with the Texas Immunization Registry. It’s also not clear if people were receiving their first or second dose of the vaccine.

It may not be enough, but it’s still better than it was. I’ll take my good news where I can.

And with all that intro, here’s your Tuesday case count update.

The latest update from the Texas Department of State Health Services shows that 505 people have been infected with measles since the outbreak began in late January in the South Plains region. Fifty-seven people have been hospitalized for treatment.

The update comes two days after the DSHS reported the death of a second child amid the outbreak. A 6-year-old child died in late February, marking the first measles death in the U.S. since 2015. Neither child had received the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, and they did not have any underlying medical conditions, according to the DSHS.

Cases continue to be concentrated in school-aged children who have not received the MMR vaccine, or whose vaccination status is unknown.

The Texas outbreak has also spread to New Mexico, which reported 56 cases on Tuesday, and Oklahoma, which reported 10 cases. New Mexico has also reported one suspected measles death, an unvaccinated adult who tested positive for the virus after dying.

The latest DSHS update includes 24 new cases, an increase of about 5% since the agency’s last update on Friday.

The DSHS said there is ongoing measles transmission in 10 counties across the state: Cochran, Dallam, Dawson, Gaines, Garza, Lynn, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

Of the 24 new cases, 13 are in Gaines County, which continues to be the epicenter of the outbreak. The county has now reported 328 cases since late January, nearly 65% of all Texas cases associated with the outbreak.

There are three new cases in Lubbock County, increasing its total to 36, and Terry County, raising its total to 46. Two new cases were reported in Hale County, which has now seen five in total.

Three counties reported one new case apiece, including Borden and Randall counties, which reported their first cases associated with the outbreak.

Of the 505 cases in Texas, 160 have been in children younger than 5 years old and 191 have been in children and teens between 5 and 17, according to the DSHS.

Only 10 cases have been in people who received at least one dose of MMR vaccine prior to an infection.

The latest DSHS update does not include any Harris County cases associated with the outbreak. Harris County Public Health was notified last week that testing conducted by a commercial laboratory confirmed a northwest Harris County child had measles, but officials noted the DSHS needed to verify the test results.

Texas has reported a total of six measles cases in 2025 that are not connected to the South Plains outbreak, including three in Harris County and one in Fort Bend County. Most of those cases are associated with international travel, and they are not included in the Texas outbreak total of 505.

I’ll chase down the other states’ numbers for the Friday update. Randall County, by the way, includes part of Amarillo, so that’s another major metro area with cases in it.

The Associated Press has a bit more detail.

As of Friday, there were seven cases at a day care where one young child who was infectious gave it to two other children before it spread to other classrooms, Lubbock Public Health director Katherine Wells said.

“Measles is so contagious I won’t be surprised if it enters other facilities,” Wells said.

There are more than 200 children at the day care, Wells said, and most have had least one dose of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, which is first recommended between 12 and 15 months old and a second shot between 4 and 6 years old.

“We do have some children that have only received one dose that are now infected,” she said.

The public health department is recommending that any child with only one vaccine get their second dose early, and changed its recommendation for kids in Lubbock County to get the first vaccine dose at 6 months old instead of 1. A child who is unvaccinated and attends the day care must stay home for 21 days since their last exposure, Wells said.

That doesn’t sound good. Here’s some more on the updated MMR vaccine guidance for Lubbock. All I can say is I hope plenty of people follow that advice.

UPDATE: Hello, El Paso.

William Beaumont Army Medical Center has confirmed El Paso’s first case of measles connected to the ongoing West Texas and Panhandle outbreak.

The patient was checked in Friday at the Mendoza Soldier Family Care Center on Fort Bliss, according to a Tuesday news release. Amabilia G. Payen, a spokesperson for the medical center, did not provide further details about the patient, including vaccination history.

“That is why prevention is so important,” said Maj. Lacy Male, Army public health nurse, in the news release. “The measles vaccine is highly effective, and two doses provide 97 percent protection against the disease, making it one of the best tools for prevention. There is no treatment for measles, only supportive therapy. We want to vaccinate to prevent infection altogether.”

Army health officials began contact tracing efforts to mitigate the spread of the disease, and also notified local and state health officials. The El Paso Department of Public Health has not responded to questions from El Paso Matters.

In addition to El Paso’s measles case, Mexican health authorities confirmed four cases of measles, or sarampión, in neighboring Ciudad Juárez as of Monday.

It’s just gonna keep on spreading, because that’s what measles does.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Measles update: Another needless death

KP George charged with money laundering

Great.

Judge KP George

Fort Bend County Judge KP George, already facing legal troubles, was arrested Friday and charged with two counts of money laundering, according to county jail records and the district attorney’s office.

George, a Democrat first elected in 2018 and re-elected in 2022, said in a statement posted to Facebook that he had loaned personal money to his campaign and later repaid it.

“(T)here is nothing illegal about loaning personal funds to my own campaign and later repaying that loan,” he said. “This is a standard and lawful practice.”

The county judge also accused the district attorney’s office of “weaponizing” the government against him.

“Allegations and accusations are being made without full context or disclosure of the facts—deliberately manipulating the narrative to tarnish my reputation and character,” he said.

George was indicted in September on a misdemeanor charge of misrepresentation of identity. He’s accused of working with former staffer Taral Patel to create fake racist attacks against his own campaign on social media.

But prosecutors say the money laundering charge is unrelated to George’s prior indictment.

“The District Attorney’s Office has continuously stated that the investigation was ongoing, and that investigation has now led to two 3rd-degree felony indictments for Money Laundering, which were made public today,” the Fort Bend County District Attorney’s Office said in a statement. “These charges are unrelated to the pending misdemeanor and are assigned to the 458th District Court. Our office remains committed to the integrity our public deserves, and the ethics to which all prosecutors are sworn to. And our investigation remains ongoing.”

George is accused of laundering equal to or more than $30,000 but less than $150,000. According to court records, the money laundering charges are connected to alleged wire fraud and tampering with a campaign finance report.

See here and here for some background. KP George is innocent until proven guilty and is entitled to that presumption of innocence. He really ought to give serious thought to abandoning his re-election campaign, and also to maybe stepping down and sorting out his private life. There are already numerous announced challengers for his office. I wish him well and I hope he hears what I have to say. The Chron, which has a copy of the indictments in the article, has more.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment