Austin seeks waiver for its rainbow crosswalk

All the cool kids are doing it.

The city of Austin is exploring a waiver that would allow its current street art to stay in place. In a message board post on Monday, Mayor Kirk Watson said the city plans to ask the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for an exemption to preserve pavement art.

The move comes in response to a directive from Gov. Greg Abbott requiring the removal of nonstandard street markings by Nov. 7. That includes the Pride-themed crosswalk at Fourth and Colorado streets and the “Black Artists Matter” mural on 11th Street, among others.

While the city intends to comply with the directive to avoid jeopardizing millions in state and federal transportation grants, it will also explore alternative ways to celebrate Austin’s diversity. Watson proposed forming a task force composed of members from various city commissions to identify creative solutions that align with state and federal guidelines.

The issue was discussed at the LGBTQ Quality of Life Advisory Commission meeting on Monday. Commission Chair KC Coyne, speaking personally, underscored the broader impact of the installations.

“It’s not just a symbol. It actually has real mental health benefits that actually translate to safer communities for LGBTQ folks, and particularly youth,” Coyne told KVUE. “It is a gross overstep of the state and federal power on a local entity’s public art.”

See here, here, here, and here for the background. Look, I don’t expect any of these waiver requests to succeed. No one in Greg Abbott’s government is going to cross him. But the point is that Austin and San Antonio didn’t just roll over like a ragdoll. They stood up and they pushed back. They may wind up in the same place that Houston is at now, but at least they tried. They showed that they cared. I do not understand why Mayor Whitmire, with his Fifty Years Of Doing Government Stuff, doesn’t understand this.

And on a related note:

Less than a day after Houston city crews removed Montrose’s rainbow crosswalks, protesters brought the colors back — and the debate over the symbol’s meaning is only growing louder.

Overnight and into early Tuesday morning, residents returned to the intersection of Westheimer and Taft, repainting sections of the area in rainbow hues and spray-painting messages. They say they’re not ready to let the symbol go.

“Everyone’s just really happy that someone’s doing something and there’s already chalk out here. I just wanted to do something to make it more permanent,” said Jai, one of the protesters.

[…]

“Even losing the crosswalk doesn’t mean that the work we do ends,” said Kevin Strickland with Walk and Roll Houston. “It’s a beginning for us, not an end.”

Now, less than 24 hours after the latest removal, residents are once again filling the sidewalks and crosswalks with color — using spray paint, chalk, and their voices.

Community leaders say they’re already looking at ways to preserve visibility through new Pride art projects across the neighborhood.

“We’re going to try to coordinate with some of the businesses and residents to see if they’re interested in painting their driveways or parking lots,” said Jack Valinski, president of the Neartown/Montrose Super Neighborhood.

You have to watch the story video to see that what was brought back was a rainbow spray painted on the sidewalk wheelchair ramps. Which HPD cops were taking pictures of as evidence of “vandalism”. There damn well better not be any charges filed for this, that’s all I’ll say about that.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The indie bookstore comeback

Good to see. Hope it lasts.

Barnes & Noble, the nationwide bookseller, almost went out of business a few years ago. Its return is being heralded as a case study and a corporate comeback.

Once upon a time, Barnes & Noble was seen as a major factor in pushing mom and pop booksellers out of business. And yet, since 2020, the number of independent bookstores across the nation has grown by 70 percent – and Texas is a central player.

How did that happen?

Devan Markham, who reports for Straight Arrow News, said the answer lies in people seeking out local businesses that offer a sense of community.

“Allison Hill at the American Booksellers Association backed that data up and she actually said that it was the year 2020 in which we saw this growth of bookstores starting to open, which is kind of contradictory,” Markham said. “You would think that with the economy and uncertainty that you would see the exact opposite.”

Last year alone, 21 new stores opened across Texas.

“So far this year, we’re seeing 13 stores that have already opened,” Markham said. “A lot of the stores that have opened up in what they call ‘book deserts’ or ‘bookstore deserts.’ And that really means that there just isn’t enough availability of books in the area.”

And unlike national chains, Markham said these local stores are able to tune in more to the local vibe.

“People are craving community. They’re craving authentic experiences. And bookstores these days aren’t just about selling books anymore,” she said. “They’re about connecting, lingering, and finding places to belong.

I spoke to booksellers for the piece, and they said owning an independent bookshop is about creating and fostering a welcoming environment… They’re offering options: coffee shops, they’re adding bars to their shops, they’re having book clubs and comedy nights.”

Indeed. The embedded image, a lovely little shop in Seguin that opened a few years ago, is a good example of that. In addition to the books, they serve breakfast, brunch, coffee, dessert, beer and wine. I’d bet the food is at least as much of their business as the books. They have books clubs, author readings, other events – in many ways, they serve as the kind of third space that we often lament is lacking in too many areas. You never know what the future will bring – I’d guess that real estate values and property taxes will be going up as Seguin continues to grow, and that’s never good for a little brick-and-mortar place – but this seems like a good plan.

It’s not the only path forward, either. Murder by the Book here in Houston has survived for decades, going back to before the time when chain bookstores were the enemy, by having great inventory, a crew that could always recommend something new that you’d like, and the best lineup of mystery/detective/thriller author events around. Whoever your favorite author from that genre was, sooner or later they came to MBTB for a reading.

Anyway, my point is that while there are plenty of terrible things happening in the world, there are also good things, and you should seek them out. I suspect a lot of you reading this are book people. Go find the little bookstore nearest to you and spend a little time there. Let’s keep this good thing we’ve got going.

Posted in Books, The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The indie bookstore comeback

Texas blog roundup for the week of October 20

Wouldn’t you rather see the weekly Texas Progressive Alliance roundups announced at airports instead of those dreadful Homeland Security videos? Of course you would.

Off the Kuff published interviews with Amanda Edwards,Isaiah Martin, Christian Menefee, and Jolanda Jones, candidates in the special election for CD18.

SocraticGadfly talked about how the Texas GOP “TACO-ed” on threat vs reality of state representative censures.

Neil at Houston Democracy Project spoke at the successful No Kings protest at Houston City Hall. Here is what he said about empowering ourselves. There were 20,000 Downtown & additional 25,000 at protests across Houston-region.

====================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

The Barbed Wire looks at the messy “Texas National Guard in Illinois” situation.

Texas 2036 backs State Proposition 4 on the November ballot for long term water investment.

The Texas Signal tries to find out just how weird the Houston Heights is.

Mean Green Cougar Red checks in on Iceland’s tourist industry.

Evil MoPac has Halloween costume ideas for you.

The Texas Observer compares today’s “rainbow panic” to yesteryear’s “satanic panic”.

G. Elliott Morris estimates that the second “No Kings Day” protests were “likely the largest single-day political demonstration since 1970”.

The TPA says a sad farewell to CityCast Houston and its daily newsletter Hey Houston, which end this week after a three-year run. CityCast Austin continues on.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of October 20

We could have asked!

I am smacking my forehead so hard, you guys.

The City of San Antonio will seek an exemption from the State of Texas in order to keep the city’s rainbow crosswalk. The decision comes after the state issued a mandate to cities earlier this month to remove roadway markings that could be deemed political or ideological.

The issue was discussed during a monthly meeting of the city’s LGBTQ+ Advisory Commission Monday night. The city attorney’s office presented its case that TxDOT allows for exemptions in certain circumstances.

According to the stipulations included in the letter sent to cities on Oct. 8, the exemption can apply if there is a benefit to public safety.

“Exceptions may be granted only with written approval from TxDOT’s Traffic Safety Division, based on a demonstrated public safety benefit or compelling justification,” it said.

First Assistant City Attorney Liz Provencio told the city’s advisory commission that the exemption would be based on a reduction in the number of traffic incidents at the crosswalk since it was installed in 2018.

“We have data going back three years. That data indicated that there were two incidents that had occurred, and since the installation of the crosswalk, which will be going on … seven to eight years, in that entire time frame, we’ve had two (incidents) so there’s no indication that it’s made it any less safe,” she said in an interview with TPR.

The city has until November 8 to file the exemption. After that, it’s not clear when the state will review it and make a decision.

Members of the commission are appointed individually by the San Antonio City Council. Commission Chair Maria Salazar said instances like the directive from Governor Abbott are taking back the gains made by the community.

“We’re being attacked on a number of levels. And by ‘we,’ I mean the LGBTQ+ community,” she said. “This was a community effort to put this crosswalk, and it was very affirming. And so taking it out is a way of erasing us and erasing our history.”

She said she would welcome any attempt by the city to keep the crosswalk if the state rejects the exemption request.

“How does home rule or the historic district (affect this)? Does that provide any protection we have to get the city to think creatively and figure out, how we can challenge this directive from the governor?” she said.

San Antonio is the first Texas city to try to seek an exemption. The city of Houston removed its rainbow crosswalks on Monday.

See here, here, and here for the background. Now, I don’t expect this to succeed. TxDOT is fully controlled by Greg Abbott, and to whatever extent they have freedom of thought they’re still not going to cross Donald Trump and risk his wrath on the entire state. But this does accomplish three things.

One, it forces TxDOT to justify its decision. That presents the opportunity for them to say something dumb, because that’s a thing that frequently happens when you have to justify something ridiculous. Winning the longer term political fight is in part about making it clear to everyone who’s right and who’s wrong. Let them show how wrong this is.

Two, it gives San Antonio more time to evaluate its legal options, such as who would be the best plaintiff if a lawsuit is filed. Maybe a lawsuit isn’t the best way to go because an adverse ruling could have secondary effects that they don’t want. I don’t know what else they might want to consider, but having some extra time to game it out is a good thing. Which the city of Houston and Metro, by their cowardly and rash actions, refused to give themselves.

And three, it shows that they give a shit and won’t just take whatever outrageous demands these losers will make of them and bend the knee. Unlike Mayor Whitmire and Metro Chair Elizabeth Brock. If that isn’t clear now to everyone, I don’t know what else would make it clear.

UPDATE: Good point.

Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo criticized Metro Monday for removing Montrose’s rainbow crosswalks — potentially unconstitutionally, she said — before officials could counter the state-ordered action.

Metro’s decision to restripe the crosswalks came earlier this month after Gov. Greg Abbott threatened to withhold road funding from any city or county with streets bearing “social, political or ideological messages.”

Hidalgo, in a video posted Monday, said Metro’s action “arguably is unconstitutional” without a vote from the agency’s board of directors backing the decision. She said the public deserves to know who at the local level ordered the crosswalks’ removal, why there was no board vote and what alternatives were available.

Representatives with Metro and Abbott’s office did not immediately return a request for comment.

“I don’t think it’s right to sacrifice the principles of free expression, art, democracy just because they might be upset,” Hidalgo said, referring to the state government. “I mean let’s at least try.”

[…]

Hidalgo suggested she’s more open [than Mayor Whitmire] to the idea of a legal battle.

“We know that it’s a hard battle in the courts … but that doesn’t mean it’s not worth fighting,” she said.

She stopped short of committing to an upcoming legal fight, instead looking back at a missed opportunity to evade the state’s directive. The Texas Department of Transportation gave agencies 30 days to comply with the roadway marking standards, and that timeframe has yet to expire.

Hidalgo said the full 30-day window could have enabled legal action or a request for an exemption. Metro cited the 30-day timeframe when the Chronicle requested a timeline for the rainbow crosswalks’ removal Sunday. Fewer than 24 hours later, the crosswalks were gone.

Maybe the first lawsuit should be filed against Metro. And there was a 30-day deadline to comply with this ridiculous demand?!? We didn’t even need to ask for a review? Jesus H. Christ.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Harris County joins amicus effort to block Texas National Guard deployment in Chicago

From the inbox:

Harris County Attorney Christian D. Menefee has joined a national coalition of more than 100 local government leaders in filing an amicus brief opposing the Trump administration’s unlawful federalization and deployment of Texas National Guard troops to Chicago and surrounding areas.

The amicus brief, filed in State of Illinois v. Trump before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, supports Illinois’s challenge to President Trump’s order federalizing hundreds of members of the Texas National Guard and attempting to deploy them to Chicago over the objections of state and local officials.

“Once again, the Trump administration is attempting to intimidate residents of American cities by spreading lies about their crime rates to justify a domestic military action. This deployment of military forces on city streets subverts local government authority. There is no legal justification for this domestic military incursion.,” Menefee said. “This time, they want to send Texas National Guard members hundreds of miles away to police protests in Chicago against the will of Illinois officials. It’s wrong, it’s unconstitutional, and it’s un-American.”

The coalition argues that the administration has failed to meet the statutory requirements for federalizing the National Guard and is instead relying on vague justifications—including small, peaceful protests—as a pretext for military action.

“Harris County residents should be deeply concerned about this precedent,” Menefee continued. “If the President can federalize Texas National Guard members and send them to Chicago today, what’s to stop him from doing the same thing here in Houston tomorrow? Our Guard members serve their communities here at home. They shouldn’t be weaponized as political pawns against other American cities.”

This is the second time Menefee has joined legal efforts challenging the Trump administration’s unlawful military deployments. He previously joined an amicus brief in Newsom v. Trump opposing the federalization of California’s National Guard and the deployment of U.S. Marines in Los Angeles.

“The district court got it right when it blocked this deployment,” Menefee said. “The administration’s argument that the President can federalize the National Guard anytime, anywhere, for any reason—without factual justification or judicial review—is, as the court said, ‘shockingly broad.’ We’re asking the Seventh Circuit to keep that dangerous theory from becoming reality.”

Good. I don’t really have anything to add here, just that I approve. Gotta keep up the fight at every opportunity.

Posted in La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Harris County joins amicus effort to block Texas National Guard deployment in Chicago

Eagle Eye Gun Detection

There’s a new AI-enhanced weapons detection system on the block.

Eagle Eye Networks has launched its newest feature, Eagle Eye Gun Detection, an AI-enabled technology designed to detect visible firearms in real-time and alert first responders within seconds. The system integrates with existing security camera infrastructure and is now being adopted by organizations across Texas.

St. Thomas University in Houston is among the first in the nation to implement the new system. Other early adopters include Valor School and St. Julian Episcopal Church in Austin, as well as the Capital Factory.

“Gun detection that is AI-powered, triple-verified, camera agnostic, and able to work in tandem with other security systems is a game-changer. It’s a layered approach to security, and I think it is what every university should be doing,” shared H.E. Jenkins, Chief of Police at St. Thomas University, Houston.

Presented at a press conference in Austin, the system uses a triple-layer verification approach combining edge AI, advanced cloud AI, and human review to minimize false positives. Eagle Eye Gun Detection is part of the Eagle Eye Cloud VMS, a platform that supports integration with other security technologies and allows live video sharing with 911 centers.

According to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, gun violence remains a pressing issue nationwide and locally. Gun violence is now the leading cause of death for children and teens, with 503 mass shootings reported nationally in 2024. Houston has experienced seven mass shooting incidents in 2025 so far, including three at nightlife venues, reported by EveryShot.

I don’t know what AI was used to write the press release that this and every other story about Eagle Eye Gun Detection I found in Google News was based on, but someone should inform it that the name of the school in question is the University of St. Thomas, not “St. Thomas University”. I get a twitch in my eye every time I see that.

Anyway. Eagle Eye joins multiple other technologies, which use different methods and which have had varying results. I presume over time these systems will get better, though to what extent they will be a threat to our privacy and civil rights remains to be seen. Which raises a question: If they do get sufficiently good at detecting guns and other weapons on people in public spaces, at what point do Ken Paxton and the Legislature come after them? AI is The Future and all that, as long as it’s not cramping your style, am I right? I’ll know these things have crossed a threshold when I see the gun humpers have a freakout about them. KVUE, which notes some Austin schools and churches also adopting Eagle Eye, has more.

Posted in Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Eagle Eye Gun Detection

Lawsuit filed against app age verification law

I have three things to say about this.

A Texas student group and two high schoolers are suing to block a new state law that would require everyone — adults and minors alike — to verify their age before downloading or making in-app purchases.

The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court by Students Engaged in Advancing Texas (SEAT) and two minors, argues the App Store Accountability Act violates the First Amendment by restricting access to protected speech.

“The Act imposes content-based prior restraints on speech that replace parents’ freedom to moderate their children’s access to sources for learning, communication, and creativity,” the lawsuit reads. A similar lawsuit against the law was filed earlier in the day by the Computer & Communications Industry Association.

Passed with near-unanimous support during this year’s legislative session, the law would require adults to verify their age before downloading any app. Minors couldn’t download apps or make in-app purchases without parental approval, and parents would have to prove their identity and give consent each time. The law is set to take effect in January 2026.

Attorneys argue the law would have far-reaching effects, extending beyond social media to educational, news and creative apps like Wikipedia, Duolingo, Audible, Spotify, ESPN, The New York Times — even games like Minecraft. The student plaintiffs, including a high school journalist and a debater, argue it would directly limit their ability to learn, communicate and express themselves.

The lawsuit also points to parental concerns. According to the lawsuit, Vanessa Fernandez, a mother of one plaintiff, believes her son “deserves and benefits from having a certain amount of privacy and autonomy, including over his digital activities. The Act would require her to intrude on [his] privacy and autonomy to a degree she would not otherwise, effectively overriding her parental decision-making.”

1. Parental controls already exist for Android and Apple users. We used the latter for our girls, which required me to approve any apps they wanted to download. The girls found that annoying, and occasionally caused a minor issue because of the need to get an app in a timely fashion for school reasons, but we all lived through it. As such, this law doesn’t solve any problems. It just imposes government control on a parental function, which is more than a little ironic given the constitutional amendment to enshrine “parental rights” on the ballot this year.

2. Age verification is the reason that Pornhub is no longer available in Texas. It’s also been blessed by the corrupt Supreme Court, which I think will make this a tough case for the SEAT folks. It may seem reasonable enough to say “well, sure, we don’t want kids looking at porn”, but once that’s been legalized, who knows where it goes next.

3. The one thing that never seems to get discussed, or at least discussed and taken seriously enough, is the giant security risk that age verification laws introduce. Age verification is often accomplished by uploading an image of one’s drivers license to whatever service is being used, and I hope I don’t have to explain to you how risky that is. But if you need to understand that a bit more, know that 70,000 people in the UK had their government IDs exposed to hackers in the recent Discord breach. I personally would have rather let my kids download Minecraft than let their identities get stolen, but maybe that’s just me.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Early voting Day One: Looking back at 2017 and 2021

One day of early voting is in the books. I’m not going to follow the EV reports every day, as this is as off a year as we get in our election cycle, but I will check in a couple of times. I will also use this opportunity to provide some context, by looking at the turnout levels in the only two previous years where there were no regular city elections, 2017 and 2021. The numbers:

2021 total turnout = 229,036 total votes out of 2,482,914 registered voters, for 9.22% total turnout.

2017 total turnout = 150,174 total votes out of 2,233,533 registered voters, for 6.72% total turnout.

It should be noted that in 2017 there were city bond elections, including pension bonds to finish off the pension reform legislation that Mayor Turner had pushed. There was also that oddball allow booze in the Heights referendum, the likes of which we may never see again. That had the effect of skewing turnout up a bit – looking just at the citywide results, turnout in the Harris County portion of Houston was 9.49%, which means that turnout in the rest of the county was 4.26%.

There was nothing in particular pushing people to the polls in 2021 – nothing citywide, anyway. Maybe that’s the more “normal” level for these weird years, or maybe it was a high point, I don’t know. I do think we’ll exceed that level this year, given the high profile of the CD18 election, plus the At Large #4 race. We’ll see.

Here’s the Day One EV report for this election. There were 10,702 in person ballots and 3,268 mail ballot, for a total of 13,970. I don’t have a point of comparison for you and I’m not going to check this daily, but we’ll tune in later and see where we are compared to the final totals from those other years.

Finally, if you’re still trying to make sense of the Constitutional amendments on the ballot, the following is from my friend Susan, who sends out a thorough and thoughtful email of her election recommendations for March and November. It’s a great and concise summary of the propositions and how to vote on them. Read and enjoy:

My sources:  League of Women Voters’ Voters Guide and explainer videos, Austin Chronicle’s guide, and Progress Texas’ guide.
 
TL;DR:
Austin Prop Q: Yes
TX Prop 1: No
TX Prop 2: No
TX Prop 3: No
TX Prop 4: Yes
TX Prop 5: No (barely)
TX Prop 6: No
TX Prop 7: Yes
TX Prop 8: No
TX Prop 9: Toss up
TX Prop 10: Yes
TX Prop 11: No
TX Prop 12: No
TX Prop 13: No
TX Prop 14: Yes
TX Prop 15: No
TX Prop 16: No
TX Prop 17: No
The full story…
Austin Prop Q: Yes.  I’m willing to pay for parks, low-income housing, and maintenance. Increasing taxes to do so is just how government works, and the benefits outweigh the cost, here.
TX Prop 1: No.  I struggled with this one. I like education programs, but this money could go to existing community colleges instead of reinventing the wheel on new institutions.
TX Prop 2: No.  A solution in search of a problem. We don’t tax capital gains at all in Texas, and we’re exceedingly unlikely to do so. This is marketing for businesses to relocate or remain here.
TX Prop 3: No.  Another solution in search of a problem. Judges already have the power to do this, and we don’t need a law that will only make things more rigid and undermines the presumption of innocence before the law.
TX Prop 4: Yes.  This is a transfer of funds to the TX Water Development Board, and while it is a governor-appointed board, they are specialized in the field, and I trust them more than I trust the TX Lege to do the right things for water needs in the state.
TX Prop 5: Toss up.  On the one hand, inventory of other businesses are taxed as personal property, so why should ag get an exemption? On the other hand, animal feed is part of the food chain, which has other parts exempted from property taxes. I lean to No, personally, but barely.
TX Prop 6: No.  Solution in search of a problem again. We don’t levy taxes on this, and there’s no indication that we ever will, so what’s the point of a ban?
TX Prop 7: Yes.  Applies to a small group, and it’s the right thing to do for widows/widowers of veterans who died as a result of their service, even if they did not qualify for full disability while alive.
TX Prop 8: No.  Solution in search of a problem. We don’t tax inheritance, and we’re not likely to. There’s no point in a ban.
TX Prop 9:  Toss up. This could help small businesses, and it could just move the tax burden around. I’m leaning No, but might change my mind in the voting booth.
TX Prop 10: Yes.  A temporary exemption for homes completely destroyed by fire. Fires are getting to be more common in our drought-prone state. I have no problem with this.
TX Prop 11: No.  While it helps elderly or disabled homeowners, it’s unstable and it would be better not to rely on the legislature to reimburse public schools. It’s not a hard no, but it’s a no for me.
TX Prop 12: No.  HARD NO. The commission doesn’t need to be expanded, and the expansion would be entirely appointed by the Governor, creating an imbalance in the commission in favor of the Governor and against the Texas Bar. Bad for Justice.
TX Prop 13: No.  Public schools are chronically underfunded. Another exemption won’t do much. This would be a small benefit to homeowners, but not enough to trust the legislature to do the right thing.
TX Prop 14: Yes.  This sets aside money for dementia research. A worthy cause.
TX Prop 15: No.  HARD NO. The push by Christian Nationalists to use “parental rights” to harm LGBTQ+ kids and ban DEI language is wrong, and shouldn’t pass.
TX Prop 16: No.  Also a HARD NO. A solution looking for a problem. You already have to be a citizen to register to vote, and this is just voter suppression.
TX Prop 17: No.  The border wall is stupid. Anything that incentivizes the wall is also stupid. Hard No.

I’ll have another update on election turnout later this week.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Early voting Day One: Looking back at 2017 and 2021

Metro paints over the rainbow crosswalk

Ugh.

The Montrose rainbow crosswalk was gone Monday morning after protesters faced off with police as a construction crew started restriping the intersection overnight and some were were arrested, according to the Houston Police Department.

As of 8:15 a.m., fresh pavement had been laid, and police were blocking off the streets leading to the site, where a crew continued working on the roadway.

Four people were taken into custody for blocking the roadway, and charges were pending Monday afternoon, according to Houston police. Police were on scene between 11 p.m. Sunday and 6:30 a.m. Monday, according to the department.

Video footage captured by OnScene TV showed more than a dozen people at the crosswalks at Westheimer Road and Taft Street, with some sitting in the road. Construction machinery towered over them while police tried steering them away from the scene.

Police could be seen a video physically removing two protesters from the crosswalk.

[…]

City Council Member Abbie Kamin, who represents Montrose, said Metro officials told her they’d communicate the timing of the crosswalks’ removal beforehand for the sake of public transparency. She said she instead found out about the roadwork from nearby residents who saw machinery enter the area a few hours in advance.

The Chronicle reached out to Metro for comment.

“This is shameful, Kamin said. “All you have to do is look at the time of night it was removed to know how cowardly this is.”

See here and here for the background. CM Kamin has this exactly right. Not just doing it without notice, but doing it when there hasn’t been any specific threat to anything – complying in advance, always a winner – and when the many political leaders who denounced this were still discussing a response strategy that may involve litigation, is craven beyond belief. Everyone involved should be ashamed of themselves. Gwen Howerton tweeted through the night about it if you want to see some live action footage, and The Barbed Wire has more.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

October 2025 campaign finance reports – Senate and Congress (Not CD18)

I’m doing this one a little differently, for two reasons. One is that I want to include non-Democratic candidates in the CD18 special election, just so we’re all on the same page. And two, as of this past weekend when I started working on this post, none of the CD18 candidates had Q3 reports posted, for whatever the reason. So I’m hoping that they will get updated Real Soon Now, but in the meantime here are the rest of them.

James Talarico – Senate
Colin Allred – Senate
Terry Virts – Senate
Michael Swanson – Senate

Shaun Finnie – CD02
Evan Hunt – CD03
Jordan Wheatley – CD03
Lizzie Fletcher – CD07
Al Green – CD09
Tayhlor Coleman – CD10
Bobby Pulido – CD15
Ada Cuellar – CD15
Veronica Escobar – CD16
Joaquin Castro – CD20
Marquette Greene-Scott – CD22
Santos Limon – CD23
Kevin Burge – CD24
Jon Buchwald – CD24
William Marks – CD25
Ernest Lineberger – CD26
Henry Cuellar – CD28
Sylvia Garcia – CD29
Jasmine Crockett – CD30
Caitlin Rourk – CD31
Stuart Whitlow – CD31
Justin Early – CD31
Julie Johnson – CD32
Marc Veasey – CD33
Vicente Gonzalez – CD34
Whitney Masterson-Moyes – CD35
John Lira – CD35
Johnny Garcia – CD35
Melissa McDonough – CD38
Marvalette Hunter – CD38


Dist  Name             Raised      Spent    Loans    On Hand
============================================================
Sen   Talarico      6,268,609  1,309,971        0  4,958,638
Sen   Allred        4,933,178  3,142,537        0  1,790,641
Sen   Virts           473,098    320,721  367,259    152,376
Sen   Swanson           6,991      6,991    4,000          0

02    Finnie        1,391,100    154,341  866,000  1,236,759
03    Hunt            190,567    125,499   55,580     65,067
03    Wheatley         20,610     20,298        0        311
07    Fletcher        729,506    326,348        0  1,719,819
09    Green           582,144    228,592        0    572,636
10    Coleman          65,604     62,304   31,035      3,299
15    Pulido          306,804     32,469        0    274,335
15    Cuellar, A      249,608    120,103  125,000    129,504
16    Escobar         510,139    310,045        0    315,937
20    Castro          249,638    211,169        0    177,127
22    Greene-Scott     15,940      6,298        0      9,678
23    Limon           356,755      6,815  354,400    349,940
24    Burge            57,852     33,015        0     24,837
24    Buchwald        116,301     35,690   95,560     80,611
25    Marks            53,493      9,471   30,000     44,022
26    Lineberger       59,745     47,644   36,000     15,593
28    Cuellar         867,164    550,781  200,000    364,341
29    Garcia          405,896    375,602        0    402,047
30    Crockett      6,560,239  3,570,880        0  4,600,591
31    Rourk           100,219     77,789        0     22,430
31    Whitlow          32,055     20,705  234,055     15,000
31    Early            48,161     43,506   18,000      4,654
32    Johnson         960,040    384,047        0    806,897
33    Veasey          661,999    741,250        0    930,229
34    Gonzalez      1,301,352    312,792        0  1,270,618
35    M-Moyes          43,056     11,052   30,000     32,004
35    Lira             29,619      5,370        0     24,248
35    Garcia
37    Doggett          62,149     65,791        0  6,224,186
38    McDonough        19,966     10,111  113,239     32,554
38    Hunter           73,174     18,530        0     54,643

April reports are here and July reports are here. As noted above, the finance report system was still showing the Q2 report for CD18 candidates. It was also still showing the Q2 report for Santos Limon in CD23. I don’t know if that’s a system issue or a candidate issue, but if you look at the Q2 numbers and see that they’re the same there for Limon as they are here, that’s why.

We’ve discussed James Talarico, so I’ll mostly skip past this. Colin Allred as noted also raised a decent amount of cash, though as you can see with a much higher burn rate. He had $639K transferred in from committee(s) and $564K transferred out to committee(s), and I’m not sure what to make of that. And though he’s already being treated as a bit of an afterthought in this race, I’m glad Terry Virts has taken in almost half a million bucks. I know nothing about Michael Swanson, but it looks to me like maybe he’s ended his campaign and closed his account.

I suppose one reason why Rep. Jasmine Crockett keeps being included in statewide polls is because right now she’s Talarico’s biggest competition on the money-raising side. She has not ruled out running for Senate, though I don’t think she will at this point.

Al Green is more or less confirmed to be running for CD18 next year. Still no one has declared for CD09 (more on that in a minute), which annoys and frustrates me. Crockett is probably running again in CD30, though she has mentioned CD33 as well. Julie Johnson is running for CD33, which is now a Dallas district, and I’m not aware of anyone declaring for CD32, which is the reddest of the five new districts the GOP drew for themselves. Marc Veasey will have his hands full. I’m told Sylvia Garcia has been recruiting in CD09, mostly incumbent Dem legislators who have understandably not shown any interest. Gonna need to look outside the box here. Also, former CD18 candidate Robert Slater is saying he will run in CD29. He doesn’t have any funds to report, at least as of June 30, and I can’t say I take his candidacy seriously.

I’ve removed Greg Casar and Lloyd Doggett from this roundup since Doggett will step down and let Casar have CD37. A couple of contenders have emerged in CD35, though the one who may be of the greatest interest is Johnny Garcia, longtime deputy and public information officer for the Bexar County Sheriff’s Department. He declared in October, so no report for him as yet.

Bobby Pulido and Ada Cuellar are off to decent starts in CD15. State Sen. Sarah Eckhardt has not yet confirmed or backed out of running in CD10. I’ve added a couple of other new names in new districts since last time. I still haven’t met Shaun Finnie or Marvalette Hunter, but I hope to soon.

What I hope to see in the January reports, which will be filed after everyone has picked a district and made it official: A serious candidate in CD09, and everyone raising more money. Let’s go, y’all.

UPDATE: Per The Downballot, CD18 special election candidates have until October 23 to file their Q3 reports. I’ll aim to round those up on Friday or Saturday, as time allows.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Council votes to close Polk Street

Welp.

The City Council voted Wednesday to close Polk Street for the $2 billion expansion of the George R. Brown Convention Center — an early step in a 15-year plan Houston First says will “redefine” downtown, and critics say will cut a vital East End connection without enough transparency or traffic mitigation.

Under the measure approved by council, Houston First will purchase several downtown street segments, including portions of Polk, Chenevert, Hamilton, Jackson, Clay, and Bell streets, as well as part of Avenida de las Americas, for incorporation into the convention center campus. The formal sale and abandonment of streets will return to Council after appraisals, easement relocations and a finalized traffic impact analysis are complete.

Council voted 14-1, with Council Member Edward Pollard being the lone vote against it.

Houston First CEO Michael Heckman told council the expansion will be “nothing like it in the United States.” He said the project will generate a $20 billion economic impact over 30 years and emphasized that no general-fund dollars will be used.

District I Council Member Joaquin Martinez, who represents parts of downtown and the East End and delayed the item last week, ultimately supported the motion but added a Memorandum of Understanding among the city, Houston First and Houston Public Works. The agreement outlines commitments to expand community engagement, communication and mobility planning around the project.

Under the memorandum, the city and Houston First are supposed to:

  • Establish bilingual public engagement throughout the GRB expansion construction period.
  • Create a 13-member community advisory board, appointed by the District I, H and D council members, composed of area stakeholders and residents from the east side of downtown, to help plan the GRB’s east entryway and other public spaces tied to the expansion. The group will meet quarterly.
  • Work with TxDOT and local groups to evaluate converting Leeland Street into a two-way corridor with pedestrian access as an alternative to Polk.
  • Ensure safe pedestrian access on Polk Street for at least one year following closure.
  • Make new public spaces available six days a year, free of charge, to local nonprofits for community events.

Community group People for Polk, which has led opposition to the street closure, said it was not briefed on the memorandum before the vote.

“Despite the vote being on the schedule for today, the City has not shared the memorandum with us at this time, less than an hour before the vote is scheduled,” the group said in a statement. “Neither People for Polk nor the Houston community have seen a budget for the GRB expansion, the appraisal of value for our lost public streets, or how Houston First is planning to amend the TxDOT plan.”

Martinez said the memorandum includes many of the residents’ requests.

“Passing this item is not the end,” Martinez said. “It’s only the beginning, and this MOU serves as a preview of many of the benefits that will come from this project.”

Several council members supported the street closure but criticized the process.

“You can reach the right result, but if a bad process was followed, then people end up with hard feelings and feel that real engagement did not occur. They weren’t seen, they weren’t listened to, they weren’t heard. And I think that unfortunately is what we have here,” said Council Member Julian Ramirez.

Ramirez asked Heckman if Houston First would explore additional streets besides Leeland for two-way conversions; Heckman replied, “Absolutely.”

See here for the most recent update. I like the idea of updating and expanding the George R. Brown Convention Center. I think it’s an important asset for the city and it’s one we need to keep competitive with other cities. I’m unclear on the finances of this deal, I’m concerned what traffic is going to look like in that area post-Polk closure, and I don’t think the residents of the affected area got sufficiently heard. I hope it goes better from here, because it’s going to affect a whole lot of us. CultureMap and Emily Takes Notes have more.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Council votes to close Polk Street

Our flying taxi dreams will not come true in time for the World Cup

Sadness.

Two major transit modes won’t play a role in moving World Cup visitors around.

Flying taxis, which Arlington Mayor Jim Ross hoped would be ready in time for the tournament, won’t be taking spectators to the stadium through the skies.

The city hopes to have them in the skies above the entertainment district, they just won’t be able to board passengers because the vehicles won’t be certified in time.

“We are still going to have at our municipal airport, we’re going to have a location for air taxis to land, take off, and charge,” [Alicia Winkelblech, the city’s director of transportation] told KERA News. “But it’s going be more of a demonstration type thing, if you think kind of world’s fair.”

We had hope as recently as January and February that flying taxis could be a part of the transportation plan for Arlington in the World Cup, but alas. I suppose there could still be hope for Houston, but I haven’t seen any further mention of the air taxis here, so probably not. Ah, well, there’s still hope for the LA Olympics in 2028, which got a bit of a boost from the feds in June. Stay tuned on that one.

Posted in Other sports, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Our flying taxi dreams will not come true in time for the World Cup

Weekend link dump for October 19

“Political consultants who spoke to NOTUS said they’re using AI tools like ChatGPT for a wide array of purposes. Some use it for brainstorming, drafting campaign communications and summarizing complex policy memos. Others said they’ve used AI for transforming text into audio voiceovers and generating backgrounds or design elements for social media posts and campaign ads.”

“What they find is the same horseshoe: Populist attitudes are more prevalent on the far left and far right. (But there’s a twist!)”

“After 55 years of weirding out radio listeners and influencing the likes of “Weird Al” Yankovic, Dr. Demento honked his horn for one final broadcast yesterday, hosting the final episode of The Dr. Demento Show. To mark the occasion, Demento treated dementors and dementoids to the longest nationally broadcast Dr. Demento Show ever, a three-and-a-half-hour-long extravaganza, counting down Demento’s “top 40 most demanded demented discs and tapes” from across his career.”

“I’m a MAHA Mom, and Here’s Why I Won’t Stop My Monkeys from Jumping on the Bed—No Matter What the Doctor Says”.

“If you take away discipline from firms and allow them to do harmful things that enrich themselves without consequence, you should expect that they will do those things.”

“No one has any idea how much the Trump regime is spending“.

“They Tried to Self-Deport, Then Got Stranded in Trump’s America”. These guys can’t even do their own evil well.

RIP, Sandy Alomar, Sr, former MLB infielder and coach, manager in the minor leagues and Puerto Rican Winter League, father of former MLB players Roberto Alomar and Sandy Alomar, Jr.

Good on you, Doc Rivers.

“Propagandists are not “provocateurs.” Trump’s stated grounds for his abuses of power are not actual reasons, they are pretexts created for purely instrumental ends. And Kristi Noem did not “stare down” mobs of antifa terrorists in Portland. That’s because there isn’t any serious network of organized leftist violence in the United States, no matter how loudly Miller shrieks otherwise. Grasping how committed MAGA is to such industrial-scale deceptions is critical to getting this broader moment right.”

RIP, D’Angelo, four-time Grammy-winning singer, songwriter, and producer.

RIP, Miss Major Griffin-Gracy, longtime transgender activist.

RIP, TiVo, which has officially exited the hardware business. We finally had to ditch ours a few months ago after an Xfinity firmware update fried the cable cards that the TiVo needed and which were no longer supported by Comcast. We got our TiVo way back in 2003, when I convinced Tiffany that it would be a great thing to have once we had a baby and needed something to watch while we were up all night with her. I got that line from my college buddy David, who asserted that you could justify any purchase if you claimed it was “for the baby”. (He got a tablesaw with that line.) Anyway, Mark Evanier sums it up.

“Penn State needed to fire its head coach—and that’s a damning indictment of the sport.”

RIP, Drew Struzan, legendary movie poster artist.

They’re really not sending their best, are they? And none of them are “kids”.

“There are two issue here. One is that the MAGA right has a legitimate Nazi problem. The second is that the MAGA right believes there are two standards: The ultra-permissive one that applies to them and their followers within which there are zero consequences for even the worst behavior, and the far stricter one that applies to liberals or any other perceived political opponents. And they’re willing to use the full force of government to punish their opponents and create maximal permissiveness for themselves.”

“We should get back to embarrassing people who engage in such transparent acts of selling out.”

“On Monday, a publicly-sourced archive of more than 10,000 national park signs and monument placards went public as part of a massive volunteer project to save historical and educational placards from around the country that risk removal by the Trump administration.”

“The original sin of the whole arc of digital media was the belief that digital media was part of the tech business. That was both the cause and effect of the boomlet of techcentric venture capital that flowed into digital media starting around 2004 and 2005, right about the time the dot com bust hangover was receding into the rearview.”

RIP, Susan Stamberg, “founding mother” of NPR and the first U.S. woman to anchor a nightly national news program.

RIP, Ace Frehley, guitarist and founding member of KISS.

Let them be shocked by this story and let that shock teach them to also be shocked by this story and by this story and by this story and by this story and by this story and by this story and by this one. We need them to be shocked because we need them — we need as many of them as we can get if we’re going to put a stop to stories like those.”

RIP, Samantha Eggar, Oscar-nominated actor best known for The Collector and Doctor Dolittle.

“It’s entirely possible that Natalie Grabow — who last weekend, at 80 years old, became the oldest woman to complete the Ironman World Championship course in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii — is just getting started.”

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekend link dump for October 19

Early voting for the November 2025 election begins tomorrow

From the inbox:

The Harris County Clerk’s Office (HCCO) urges voters to take advantage of Early Voting, which starts Monday, October 20, and ends Friday, October 31.

Ballot Items Include

  • 17 proposed amendments to the Texas Constitution
  • 18th Congressional District
  • Houston City Council At-Large Position 4
  • Other local elections (Cities, school districts, utility districts, and college trustees)

“This election provides Harris County voters an opportunity to shape the future of their communities and impact leadership at both the local and state levels,” said Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth.

Where and When to Vote

  • Early Voting: 70 vote centers open, October 20-31 from 7 a.m. – 7 p.m. daily
    (Except Sunday, Oct. 26Noon – 7 p.m.)
  • Election Day: Nearly 600 vote centers open, November 4 from 7 a.m. – 7 p.m.

Find your nearest vote center and sample ballot at: HarrisVotes.com.

Bring One of these Required Photo IDs

  • TX Driver’s License
  • TX Personal ID
  • TX Handgun License
  • TX Election ID Certificate
  • U.S. Military ID (with photo)
  • U.S. Citizenship Certificate (with photo)
  • U.S. Passport

Voters who do not have an acceptable photo ID may complete a Reasonable Impediment Declaration (RID) and bring a supporting document (e.g., utility bill, bank statement, or voter registration certificate).

Voting by Mail

  • Deadline to apply: Friday, October 24
  • Eligible voters: Age 65+, sick or disabled, out of county during voting period, expect to give birth within three weeks before or after Election Day, or in jail, but eligible to vote.

For more information and real-time updates: Follow @HarrisVotes or visit HarrisVotes.com

I’m always a big proponent of voting early, to make sure you get it done. I don’t expect this to be a big turnout election – were it not for the two special elections, there wouldn’t be that much to vote for – but CD18 should draw out some people who wouldn’t have been there otherwise.

If you haven’t done so yet, now’s your chance to listen to some interviews:

Amanda Edwards, CD18
Isaiah Martin, CD18
Christian Menefee, CD18
Jolanda Jones, CD18
Alejandra Salinas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Jordan Thomas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Dwight Boykins, Houston City Council At Large #4
Al Lloyd, Houston City Council At Large #4
Felicity Pereyra, HISD District I
Maria Benzon, HISD District V
Robbie McDonough, HISD District V
Michael McDonough, HISD District VI
Bridget Wade, HISD District VII
Audrey Nath, HISD District VII
Monica Flores Richart, HCC Distict I
Renee Jefferson Patterson, HCC District II
Desmond Spencer, HCC District II

Chron endorsement posts can be found here, and of course even more information can be found in the indispensable Erik Manning spreadsheet. And just think, the filing period for the 2026 primary begins in a little more than three weeks. Happy voting!

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Early voting for the November 2025 election begins tomorrow

Fort Bend redistricts its Commissioners Court

Was wondering when they were going to get around to this.

The Fort Bend County Commissioners Court voted 3–2 Monday to adopt a new precinct map, replacing boundaries drawn in 2021 and reigniting debate over political representation in the county.

The measure passed with support from Republicans County Judge KP George, Precinct 1 Commissioner Vincent Morales, and Precinct 3 Commissioner Andy Meyers. Democrats Precinct 2 Commissioner Grady Prestage and Precinct 4 Commissioner Dexter McCoy voted against it, after heated exchanges between commissioners that prompted repeated calls for order from George.

Supporters said the new map corrects what George described as “a partisan imbalance” created under the previous, Democratic-led court and restores transparency to the redistricting process.

Opponents countered that the new lines divide established neighborhoods and could weaken minority representation.

[…]

Proponents said the new map produces two Democratic-leaning and two Republican-leaning precincts, keeps elected officials within their current precincts, and costs far less than the 2021 overhaul.

Fort Bend County Republican Party Chairman Bobby Eberle said the 2021 map unfairly tilted the balance of power toward Democrats.

“Without transparency or public review, the Democrats in 2021 put forward a map to change the balance of power by creating three Democrat commissioner precincts and only one Republican precinct,” Eberle said. “This was a political power grab that does not represent the voters of Fort Bend County.”

Supporters said the new boundaries return the court to an even 2-2 partisan makeup — two Republicans and two Democrats — and were reviewed by outside legal counsel to ensure compliance with federal voting laws.

George also disputed claims that redistricting costs were excessive, saying the 2021 effort cost about $545,000 and that higher figures cited by critics were tied to unrelated courtroom construction projects.

Much of the debate centered on new language in the redistricting order describing the 2021 map as one that used race “as the predominant factor” and designated Precinct 4 as a “coalition precinct,” McCoy said.

The order cited the Fifth Circuit’s 2024 decision in Petaway v. Galveston County, which limited the use of coalition districts — areas where two or more minority groups are combined to form a majority — under the Voting Rights Act.

McCoy repeatedly pressed outside counsel to define “coalition district” and explain the basis for labeling Precinct 4 as one, but the attorney declined to answer in open session, citing attorney-client privilege.

McCoy argued that all four Fort Bend precincts are minority-majority and that singling out Precinct 4 was unsupported by evidence.

He also cited a memo from civil-rights organizations arguing that Petaway does not prohibit coalition districts and warning the county against using race to justify mid-decade redistricting.

Prestage urged the court to remove the “coalition” and “race-predominant” clauses, calling them “unnecessary” and likely to invite litigation. A motion to enter closed session for legal consultation failed on a 3–2 vote.

The majority — George, Morales and Meyers — kept the language intact, saying it was necessary to address equal-protection concerns under Petaway. The final order and map were approved 3–2.

That a redraw of the Commissioners Court precincts was on the docket came up right after KP George switched parties in June. I assume someone will file a lawsuit against this, but I doubt there would be a different outcome than in Tarrant County. It’s probably also too late to get a hearing for a restraining order before the opening of filing season, though I suppose an emergency petition could be heard and ruled on in time. I don’t expect the courts to affect this, is what I’m saying.

I haven’t seen an analysis of the partisan performance of these precincts, so it’s not clear to me what “two Democratic-leaning and two Republican-leaning precincts” means in numeric terms. The wild card here is Judge KP George himself and his perilous legal position. That’s the Republicans’ problem now. Fort Bend politics have always been a little extra. Add this to the pile of weird stuff we’ll be dealing with next year.

Posted in Election 2026, Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fort Bend redistricts its Commissioners Court

Ismaili Center to open in November

Been a long time coming.

Courtesy Abbas Yasin, Assad Yasin and Abizer Yasin

The decades-long quest to bring the first-ever U.S. location of a massive religious center to Houston is almost complete.

Ismaili Center Houston, a five-story, 11-acre religious center for Ismaili Muslims, is poised for a grand opening ceremony next month on Allen Parkway and Montrose Blvd. When the center opens, it will be the first Ismaili center in the United States and just the seventh in the world. It will be open to the public, serving as a community space for Ismaili Muslims to pray, socialize, and gather.

“The Center’s aim is to foster mutual understanding between different communities and cultures: to invite Ismailis and non-Ismailis to connect through shared events such as lectures, conferences, music recitals, and art exhibitions that nurture curiosity, celebrate difference, and encourage conversation,” Omar Samji, a spokesperson for the Ismaili Center, said in a statement last week.

Designed by the firm of Iranian, UK-based architect Farshid Moussavi, the Ismaili Center will feature a cafe, a black box theater, a library, public art and green space. It will span 150,000 square feet, and designers said the center will fit in with nearby Buffalo Bayou, which is across the street. The massive, meditating human figures found along Allen Parkway in the park were funded partially by the Ismaili Aga Khan Foundation, an international development agency founded by Karim al-Hussaini Aga Khan IV (the spiritual leader of the world’s Shia Ismaili Muslims who died earlier this year).

“The Ismaili Center gardens reinterpret Islamic landscape traditions while grounding the Center in Texas’s diverse ecologies and addressing flood risks,” said Thomas Woltz, a landscape architect on the project.

Houston’s Ismaili Center has been nearly two decades in the making. In 2006, the Aga Khan Foundation and the late Aga Khan IV announced that Houston had been selected as the site for the first Ismaili Center in the United States. The foundation paid an undisclosed sum for the land on Allen Parkway, replacing the former historic Sears warehouse on the spot.

“We hate to lose an important historic building like that, but at least this time there is a chance that some very good architecture is going to be built on that site,” David Bush, a spokesman for the Greater Houston Preservation Alliance, said of the project’s approval in 2006.

See here for the last update, which promised that the center would be opened by the end of the year. Isn’t it nice when something arrives on time? I’m excited to see what this looks like up close. I intend to visit at my first opportunity. ENR Texas & Southeast and Community Impact have more.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ismaili Center to open in November

Anti-campus protest law blocked

Good.

A federal judge in Austin has temporarily blocked key parts of Texas’ new law limiting expression on campuses, halting the University of Texas System’s enforcement of a ban on overnight expression and limits on speakers, amplified sounds and drums during the last two weeks of the semester.

U.S. District Judge David A. Ezra on Oct. 14 said the student groups who brought the case are likely to succeed on their claims that Senate Bill 2972 violates their First Amendment rights and would be irreparably harmed without relief. He wrote that the clause added to the law by the Legislature instructing universities to uphold the First Amendment “does not change the fact that the statute then requires universities to adopt policies that violate those very constitutional protections.”

“The Court cannot trust the universities to enforce their policies in a constitutional way while Plaintiffs are left in a state of uncertainty, chilling their speech for fear that their expressive conduct may violate the law or university policies,” Ezra wrote.

UT System spokesperson Ben Wright said in a statement the system cannot comment on the lawsuit but added that it “complies with the law and court orders.” Brandon Creighton, SB 2972’s author, said in a statement that his legislation strengthens free speech protections on college campuses by fostering a culture of openness while also protecting students, faculty and campus property from disruption by outside groups.

“The ruling represents only a temporary stay by one judge, and I’m confident the law will ultimately be upheld,” said Creighton, who resigned from the Texas Senate on Oct. 2 to become Texas Tech University System’s chancellor.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression sued the University of Texas System in federal court on Sept. 3 to block SB 2972, which creates rules for campus protests and gives university systems’ governing boards the power to limit where they can take place.

FIRE attorneys argue that the state law violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments because it bans protected expression from students and university employees on campuses from 10 p.m. to 8 a.m.

“The First Amendment doesn’t set when the sun goes down,” said FIRE attorney JT Morris in September. “University students have expressive freedom whether it’s midnight or midday, and Texas can’t just legislate those constitutional protections out of existence.”

See here for the background and here for a copy of the opinion. I’m sorry, but cases like this are not close calls, and if the Fifth Circuit and/or SCOTUS don’t see it that way then the Constitution is written on toilet paper. Good thing we’ve got all those “free speech warriors” out there defending it, am I right? Sheesh. Texas Public Radio has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Anti-campus protest law blocked

Punt!

That seems to be the Mayor’s plan for fixing our finances.

Mayor John Whitmire

Mayor John Whitmire and City Council members on Wednesday opted to keep Houston’s property tax rate flat as calls for more revenue reach an inflection point at City Hall.

While the move means an unchanged tax rate for Houstonians, it also means the city will have to draw down another $53 million from its savings to cover its $7 billion budget this year, in turn creating a $128.5 million deficit to start off the fiscal year.

The decision came down to a 12-3 vote with Council Member Tiffany D. Thomas absent. Council Members Abbie Kamin, Edward Pollard and Sallie Alcorn – the council’s budget chair and one of the most trusted voices in Houston government on the city’s finances – were among the no votes.

“It’s a swing and a miss to not bring in the revenue we need to cover our budget,” Alcorn said ahead of the vote. “What I know with certainty is that dipping further into our fund balance by $53 million weakens the city’s financial position, and it deepens future deficits.”

Whitmire has said time and time again he will not go to voters to introduce new fees or increased taxes until his team does the work to root out “waste, fraud and abuse” from city government. Some of that work has already begun, with the administration commissioning a study that pointed out ways in which the city could be more efficient.

The study’s recommendations led to consolidations in city departments, sliced department budgets that impacted city services, a hiring freeze and a voluntary retirement program that cost the city more than 24,000 years of experience.

But the city has long had a spending problem, and while Whitmire has not raised taxes, he has raised costs and has yet to present a plan for how he will bring more revenue into city government as it faces a $227 million deficit heading into the next fiscal year. That deficit could grow to $463 million by 2030 should the city continue spending as is without a plan to keep its wallet stocked. Meanwhile, residents continue to complain about inadequate city services like trash pickup.

Whitmire doubled down on his plan to root out corruption and waste at the start of the meeting and said a plan for revenue did exist, but he did not elaborate on what that plan included. In the past, he’s alluded to getting more money from METRO, collaborating on services with Harris County and joining forces with other cities and going to the state.

“We do have a plan. Do our critics really think that we’d be sitting up here without a plan for how we’re going to fund the city?” Whitmire said. “It’s in its final consideration, but we’ll do it without raising taxes, because I understand the pain that our residents have over affordability. Taxes harm affordability.”

Houston differs from other major cities across the state with its lack of fees for residents’ services. While Houston boasts the lowest tax rate of all the major Texas cities, it does not have a trash, utility transfer or environmental fee that adds a boost to other municipalities’ general funds, which covers city services.

See here for some background, and here for a preview story. I don’t know what the Mayor’s plan is. CM Alcorn doesn’t know what the Mayor’s plan is. The Chron editorial board, which notes that the city has foregone $2.2 billion in revenue since the stupid cap kicked in a decade ago, doesn’t know what the Mayor’s plan is. At this point it’s more a concept of a plan than a plan. I hate to be a nag, but what we have here is a revenue problem. We would not be in this position now if not for the stupid revenue cap. Artificial constraints based on bad metrics pushed by ideologues make for unsuccessful public policy. I don’t know what else to tell you.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Endorsement watch: Cy-Fair ISD and the constitutional amendments

The Chron calls for sanity in Cy-Fair where its wingnut board members have been running wild.

MAGA-on-MAGA mudslinging. Secret recordings. Anti-woke purges.

We wish we were talking about the latest White House sideshow. Unfortunately, we’re talking about the board of trustees overseeing the state’s third-largest public school system: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD.

A once-rural district in the northwest reaches of Harris County, Cy-Fair ISD has rapidly grown to become a “destination” district — the kind of place with stellar schools that families uproot everything for. This year, it was one of the most improved in the Houston area, with zero D and F campuses. But those impressive gains appear to be despite its unruly board, not because of it.

Facing an array of pressing issues — too many kids still reading below grade levellow teacher morale, a ballooning budget deficit — the board’s 6-1 conservative majority picked another priority. Namely, to put their religion into schools.

Read on for more, they brought the receipts and a decent amount of exhausted outrage. Going by their star-rating system, two of the Cy-Fair ISD trustees are the two worst candidates who were considered in the process for this year. All this was also ably covered in Franklin Strong‘s Book-Loving Texans’ Guide to the November 2025 school board elections, which I mentioned in the post about HISD endorsements. I hesitate to get my hopes up about these suburban school board races, but things went pretty well in May, so I’m tentatively willing to give it a try. Remember the names Lesley Guilmart, Cleveland Lane Jr., and Kendra Camarena, tell your friends in Cy-Fair about them, and for heaven’s sake vote for them yourself if you’re in that district.

The Chron also made their recommendations on the many Constitutional amendments on the ballot, the one thing that everyone in Texas can vote on. As noted before, I disagree with them on Props 3 and 16, and am either in agreement or at least not obviously in disagreement with them on the rest.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Endorsement watch: Cy-Fair ISD and the constitutional amendments

UH/Hobby poll of CD18: Menefee 27, Edwards 23, Jones 15

I figured there’d be another poll of this race from them.

Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee and former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards are leading the crowded race to fill Texas’ 18 Congressional District seat, according to a new University of Houston Hobby School of Public Affairs poll.

The online survey, conducted Oct. 7–11 among 1,200 likely voters, found Menefee with 27% support and Edwards with 23%. State Rep. Jolanda Jones trailed at 15%, followed by Carmen Maria Montiel at 6%, George Foreman Jr. at 4%, Isaiah Martin at 4%, Carter Page at 3%, and Ronald Dwayne Whitfield at 2%. About 2% of voters were split among several other candidates, while 13% said they were undecided.

The results suggest that no candidate is on track to win more than half the vote, meaning the race will likely advance to a runoff early next year. The report notes that under federal election rules requiring extra time for military and overseas ballots, the runoff would probably take place in February 2026, roughly three months after the Nov. 4 election.

If no one wins outright in November, the poll points to a likely runoff between Menefee and Edwards. In that scenario, Menefee would have a slight edge, leading Edwards 36% to 34%, while about 1 in 5 voters said they’re still unsure.

Menefee would hold a larger lead if he faced Jones instead, 43% to 26%. Edwards would also beat Jones by a wide margin, 44% to 26%.

The survey found that the district’s likely voters are overwhelmingly Democratic, with 72% identifying with the party, 21% identifying as Republican, and 6% as independent. The electorate skews older, with two-thirds being 55 or older, and women make up 56% of likely voters.

You can see the poll memo here, with a link to the full report. This result is surprisingly close to the Texas Victory Consulting poll from earlier in the month, which had Menefee 30, Edwards 24, Jones 19. Both had Republican Carmen Montiel at six percent, which is much lower than what internal campaign polls had her at. For that matter, the UH/Hobby poll from August had Montiel at 14%, tied with Jones for third again behind Menefee and Edwards, who were tied for first. I suspect Montiel is more likely to get above ten percent (but not by much) than below, but this may be a function of the fact that Menefee, Edwards, and Jones are running visible campaigns and Montiel is not. I suspect the same is also true for Isaiah Martin, who hasn’t come close to the top in any poll so far.

But who knows, as always special elections are tough to sample. I won’t say that anything can happen, but any combination of Menefee, Edwards, and Jones ending up in the runoff is plausible to me. I’ll be reviewing the campaign finance reports soon, and you can go back and listen to my interviews as you see fit:

Amanda Edwards
Isaiah Martin
Christian Menefee
Jolanda Jones

Early voting begins Monday. Are you ready to vote yet? Campos and Houston Public Media have more.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on UH/Hobby poll of CD18: Menefee 27, Edwards 23, Jones 15

Paxton sues the guy attempting the Loving County takeover

Whatever.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Monday filed a lawsuit against the leader of a group of people that recently moved into a wealthy far West Texas county with the expressed intent to wrest political control from the current office holders.

Paxton also filed a request for a temporary restraining order against Malcolm Tanner for what the attorney general asserted were environment violations on the isolated plot of land in Loving County where members of his organization, the Melanated People of Power, have erected a small encampment of RVs and tents.

The State of Texas “requests that defendant be enjoined from allowing any person to move on to, reside, or otherwise establish habitation or domicile on the property,” the filing said.

In numerous social media posts, Tanner has declared his intention to take over Loving County’s government by moving in enough of his supporters, who he has attracted there by promising free homes and a $5,000 monthly stipend. Thanks to a gusher of oil and gas revenue, the county, which sits in the Permian Basin, is one of the state’s wealthiest.

The Houston Chronicle reported on Tanner and his political plans three weeks ago. Days later, several state and federal elected officials requested law enforcement and elections officials mount investigations.

Paxton’s office was the first to make an official filing. “Indiana resident Malcolm Tanner has no right to try and take over Loving County with illegal schemes that endanger real Texans,” the attorney general said in a statement accompanying the lawsuit’s filing in state district court in Loving County.

“His deceptive and unlawful scheme to lure people with free housing for the purpose of conducting a political takeover is a disgustingly fraudulent plot to line his own pockets. I will not stand by while frauds try to carve up Texas for themselves and make everyone sicker and less safe along the way.”

In the lawsuit, state prosecutors alleged that Tanner violated Texas health and safety codes when he and his followers established their encampment without septic or sewer access on two 5-acre parcels about a half-hour drive on rough caliche roads outside of Mentone, the county’s only city.

Paxton, who is running for the U.S. Senate, also claimed Tanner had broken a state law against making terroristic threats by “threatening violence against law enforcement and oil field workers;” and had violated the Deceptive Trade Practice Act, a state statute Paxton’s office has turned to frequently in recent years to make its cases.

“The majority of the individuals living on the property were enticed by his promise of ‘free’ homes and moved from out of state,” according to the lawsuit. “But rather than homes (much less free homes), these people are now living in recreational vehicles and camper vans that were purchased by Tanner and lack running water, proper waste disposal, or reliable electricity.”

It added: “Reports indicate that individuals who move to defendant’s property are evicted when they fail to make monthly payments or perform work on defendant’s behalf.”

See here and here for the background. I mean, on the one hand every video this guy is in should be captioned with “I AM NOW DOING A SCAM” at all times. There’s just no possible way that he’s on the up-and-up. And yet, this lawsuit just smells of weak sauce to me. Like, “terroristic threats”? Ted Cruz’s bacon ad is more violent than anything this guy has said. And when was the last time Ken Paxton cared about anyone’s sewer or septic access? Maybe his go-to Deceptive Trade Practices move has some juice to it, but this all has big “I gotta look like I’m Doing Something” energy about it. We’ll see what a judge makes of it.

Posted in Legal matters, The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Paxton sues the guy attempting the Loving County takeover

Endorsement watch: Steady on at HCC

The Chron supports the incumbents for re-election to the HCC Board of Trustees.

Fortunately, HCC’s fundamentals appear to be on the mend. Enrollment has nearly bounced back to pre-Covid levels thanks to booming suburban campuses. The board of trustees still has its struggles, but it is functioning. They unanimously approved a budget in June that addresses deferred maintenance on facilities and boosts faculty pay using increased revenue from property taxes. Student outcomes are improving too. That’s great for students but also critical to HCC’s bottom-line. In 2023, the Texas Legislature tied funding to performance metrics such as the number of students who complete 15 credit hours, transfer to a four-year college or earn degrees that can land them jobs.

In light of the recent progress at HCC, we think it’s time for stability. Two trustee positions are on the ballot, both on the north side of Houston, and we urge voters to stick with the incumbents.

District I, Monica Flores Richart

First elected in 2019, Monica Flores Richart, 51, barely got started as a trustee when Covid hit. She told the editorial board that remote learning was especially difficult for HCC where much of the training is hands-on.

“How do you teach someone to be a paramedic online?”

She said that the board and HCC leadership used emergency federal funding wisely on one-time expenses, not hires. Now, even with the funding going away, she says HCC has managed to retire debt without raising taxes. She’s worried about the future, however. If jobs disappear in a shaky economy, she warns that HCC could see a surge in enrollment while also experiencing cuts to federal support. Richart voted to keep Cesar Maldonado as the chancellor in 2023 but says she’s focused on the future, not revisiting past battles. Her challenger, Milton “Miles” Sasser, said he would have voted differently on the chancellor’s contract, but he appreciated Richart’s positivity.

[…]

District II, Renee Jefferson-Patterson

This seat has had five different trustees over seven years. At long last, voters should opt for stability and elect to keep Renee Jefferson Patterson, 46, on the board. Patterson was appointed this year to fill the vacancy left when the previous trustee, Charlene Ward Johnson, won a seat in the state Legislature. Johnson had served since 2022 after winning a special election to replace Rhonda Skillern-Jones, the trustee who took $17,000 in the Walmart parking lot while on the Houston ISD board.

During our screening, Patterson showed an understanding of a trustee’s role. Each should listen to their constituents, build consensus on the board and discuss plans with the administration, but ultimately they are only one voice among nine members whose job is to hire the chancellor, vote on the budget and shape overarching goals for the entire system. That’s what Patterson did in her advocacy for the expansion of the VAST program for people with intellectual and physical disabilities.

As noted before, District VII Trustee Dr. Cynthia Lenton-Gary is unopposed. Here are the interviews I’ve done for these races:

Monica Flores Richart
Renee Jefferson Patterson
Desmond Spencer

Spencer is running against Patterson in District II. I did not originally reach out to Miles Sasser, but he reached out to me a week or so ago; I replied to him but have not heard back. I interviewed Kathy Lynch Gunter, the other District II candidate, in 2022 when there was a special election there, you can listen to that interview here. The HCC Board has had its share of drama in recent years, as the beginning of this endorsement op-ed recounts, but it has been pretty stable and quiet since then. Listen to the interviews and see what you think.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Endorsement watch: Steady on at HCC

Interview with Jolanda Jones

Jolanda Jones

We come to the end of the line of my interviews for this cycle. I’ll be back in the saddle soon enough for the 2026 primaries, but today we are finishing off the interviews for CD18. In a race with multiple familiar names, the most familiar of them belongs to Jolanda Jones, who has served as State Representative in HD147 since 2023. Before that, she served two terms on Houston City Council and two terms on the HISD Board of Trustees. Jones is a criminal defense attorney, former track All American at the University of Houston, reality TV star, and someone who really doesn’t need this much of an introduction. This is the seventh time I have done an interview with Jolanda Jones – the sixth one, from the 2022 primary for HD147, is here – and she is always worth talking to and hearing from. So here you go:

PREVIOUSLY:

Felicity Pereyra, HISD District I
Bridget Wade, HISD District VII
Audrey Nath, HISD District VII
Maria Benzon, HISD District V
Michael McDonough, HISD District VI
Monica Flores Richart, HCC Distict I
Renee Jefferson Patterson, HCC District II
Desmond Spencer, HCC District II
Alejandra Salinas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Jordan Thomas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Dwight Boykins, Houston City Council At Large #4
Al Lloyd, Houston City Council At Large #4
Robbie McDonough, HISD District V
Amanda Edwards, CD18
Isaiah Martin, CD18
Christian Menefee, CD18

And that’s a wrap. More information about the candidates for these and other races can be found in the Erik Manning spreadsheet, where you can always see the sun, day or night. I’ll be back before we both know it for the 2026 primary. Hope you found these interviews useful, I’ll see you on the other side.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Interview with Jolanda Jones

Rep. Gina Hinojosa officially enters the Governor’s race

Good.

Rep. Gina Hinojosa

Texas Rep. Gina Hinojosa on Wednesday announced she is running for governor in 2026, setting up a potential clash between Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and one of the Legislature’s most strident critics of his school voucher program.

“Our fight right now is against the billionaires and corporations who are driving up prices, closing our neighborhood schools and cheating Texans out of basic health care,” Hinojosa, a five-term Democratic lawmaker from Austin, said in her campaign launch video. “That’s who Greg Abbott works for. I’m running for governor to work for you.”

Hinojosa’s entry expands a Democratic primary field that includes Andrew White, a Houston businessman and son of former Gov. Mark White, Bobby Cole, a rancher and retired firefighter, and Bay City Council member Benjamin Flores. Whoever wins the nomination will be a decided underdog against Abbott, who had more than $87 million in his campaign account at the end of June and has won all three of his gubernatorial races by double digits.

Hinojosa, a civil rights and union lawyer who grew up in the Rio Grande Valley, was scheduled to formally launch her campaign at a rally in Brownsville Wednesday evening.

In her campaign launch video, Hinojosa said she first decided to run for office when her son’s elementary school faced possible closure due to state budget cuts. She was elected to the Austin ISD school board in 2012, where she later served as board president before winning election to the Texas House in 2016.

Through nearly a decade in the Legislature, Hinojosa made defending public education her calling card, becoming a primary foil to Abbott on private school vouchers. In her launch video, she contrasted her efforts to bolster public school funding with Abbott’s pursuit of vouchers, which she argued would “devastate our schools.” She also criticized the governor for accepting $10 million in campaign donations from Pennsylvania GOP megadonor Jeff Yass, one of the nation’s leading voucher proponents.

“Abbott’s corruption runs deep. The billionaires he works for will not stop until they get what they want,” Hinojosa said. “As long as we have a governor that can be bought, we won’t have the Texas we deserve.”

See here and here for some background. See her campaign video here, which goes pretty hard on Abbott. His piles of campaign cash are a real obstacle, but if the vibes are shifting, that may not be as much of one as it could be. This is a tough race, and he’s never had a close election. She’s going to need all of that fight she shows in that video, and a lot of help. I will be very interested in seeing the January finance reports.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

There may be a lawsuit over the rainbow crosswalk

Good.

A legion of Houston’s elected officials gathered at the Taft and Westheimer rainbow crosswalk Tuesday as a show of force against Gov. Greg Abbott’s call to remove it or risk the loss of state transportation funding, and some even floated the potential for legal action.

The crosswalks in Montrose were painted over weeks ago due to repaving work at the intersection, and were quickly restored to their original vibrancy after outcry from the community and elected officials.

But Abbott soon swooped in Wednesday to threaten to remove Texas Department of Transportation funding from cities that painted “political ideologies” on their streets unless they were removed. Abbott’s office called rainbow crosswalks a distraction, but Council Member Abbie Kamin said Tuesday the governor had “apparently entered the portion of the program where the state of Texas is now worried about paint.”

[…]

Any notion the crosswalk was political was preposterous, Kamin said, and that Abbott had no premise to interfere in TxDOT funding to cities that didn’t comply with a “bigoted” directive. She added the move was a “hateful, bigoted” stunt that could reap consequences for not only the area’s LGBTQ+ community, but other vulnerable groups across Houston and the state.

Kamin went as far as calling the governor’s more unconstitutional since they couldn’t legally define what is or isn’t political ideology. She and others expressed worries that the governor’s call to paint over the sidewalk could extend to Black Lives Matter murals and others across the city.

“This is about content control. It’s big government overreach at its worst, and that is not the spirit of freedom we celebrate here in Texas,” Kamin said. “The governor is wasting time obsessing about paint colors while Texans are facing increasing grocery prices, skyrocketing home insurance rates, and over a million Texans are about to lose their health care coverage … We have real problems, and they deserve real leadership.”

Among those present at the news conference Tuesday were County Attorney Christian Menefee; state Sen. Molly Cook; Harris County Commissioner Lesley Briones; former and County Judge candidate Mayor Annise Parker; Controller Chris Hollins; Council Member Mario Castillo; and state Reps. Gene Wu, Christina Morales, Lauren Ashley Simmons and John Rosenthal; as well as multiple representatives from neighborhood and LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations.

[…]

No one at the county level has filed a lawsuit to intervene in the crosswalk’s repainting, Menefee said Tuesday, but the county attorney’s office was looking into potential legal arguments. City Attorney Arturo Michel didn’t immediately return a request for comment on whether the city’s legal team would step in.

Kamin said she was speaking with legal organizations and attorneys to assess the city’s options. Menefee said Tuesday members of the commissioners were upset about the crosswalk and that his office was digging as deep as they could to make a case.

“If my tenure as county attorney has been marked by anything, it’s been fighting with a scalpel,” Menefee said. “So if we believe that we can win this, then I can guarantee you every dollar to be filed. If there’s a more appropriate party to bring the case, then we’ll turn over everything we have to them and aid them in getting it filed.”

See here for the background. I should note that despite Metro immediately saying they would paint over these crosswalks in obedience of Abbott’s diktat, as of yesterday this had not happened, and who knows, maybe now it won’t. I’m glad that a bunch of Dems stood up and called BS on this, because that’s what it is. A moment’s thought makes the free speech implications of this clear, just as the terms of Abbott’s “political ideologies” claim are vague and impossible to pin down. If a lawsuit is needed, either to prevent Metro from wielding its paintbrush or to ensure that funding isn’t interrupted, then I have confidence it will be in good hands. This is the way. Kudos to all for following it.

UPDATE: Whitmire speaks, finally.

Mayor John Whitmire spoke out on Wednesday against Gov. Greg Abbott’s call to remove Montrose’s iconic rainbow crosswalk, calling the governor’s move “man-made,” “manufactured” and “counterproductive.”

[…]

As the issue unfolded, Whitmire remained silent and elected officials gathered in force to speak out against the governor’s move. The mayor was noticeably absent from a Tuesday news conference organized by Council Member Abbie Kamin that included countless area elected officials. While some officials floated legal action, neither the city or the county have filed any sort of lawsuit to interfere in the rainbow crosswalk’s removal. Kamin said Tuesday she was told Whitmire was meeting with local LGBTQ+ advocacy groups.

During Wednesday’s City Council meeting, Whitmire broke that silence, and emphasized not only the importance of the crosswalk to Houston, but his work standing up for the LGBTQ+ community during his 52 years as a Texas senator and during his time as mayor. Whitmire is the winner of a Harvey Milk award and spent time as a legislator standing up for transgender families. He added he had been in talks with his LGBTQ+ advisory board, and that all his board appointments so far were about unity for Houston.

“To politicize something so important is just counterproductive,” Whitmire said of the crosswalk.

Whitmire added he was open to suggestions for what to do next, but said city officials would likely look at what they could add to private property instead of jeopardizing city departments by putting rainbows on public property.

“You can do away with the stripes, but you’re not going to do away with the issue or the people that are valuable citizens of Houston,” Whitmire said.

Welcome to the table. Maybe for starters tell Metro to slow its roll in the repainting department, at least until we’ve agreed on a strategy.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of October 12

The Texas Progressive Alliance stands with the people of Portland and Chicago as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of October 12

Interview with Christian Menefee

Christian Menefee

Our next candidate for CD18 is another familiar name and the first person to formally announce their candidacy for this seat. Christian Menefee has been elected twice as Harris County Attorney – he had to resign to run for CD18 but is still serving as the interim County Attorney in the interim – where he made his name in the first term for aggressive enforcement of environmental laws, as well as defending Democratic countywide incumbents whose 2022 election victories were challenged in court. He and his office have been busy suing the Trump administration this year, winning multiple restraining orders on grants and other funding that had been cut. He was recently endorsed by the Chronicle for this race. You can listen to the interview I did with him for the 2024 primary here, and you can listen to this year’s interview below:

PREVIOUSLY:

Felicity Pereyra, HISD District I
Bridget Wade, HISD District VII
Audrey Nath, HISD District VII
Maria Benzon, HISD District V
Michael McDonough, HISD District VI
Monica Flores Richart, HCC Distict I
Renee Jefferson Patterson, HCC District II
Desmond Spencer, HCC District II
Alejandra Salinas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Jordan Thomas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Dwight Boykins, Houston City Council At Large #4
Al Lloyd, Houston City Council At Large #4
Robbie McDonough, HISD District V
Amanda Edwards, CD18
Isaiah Martin, CD18

More information about the candidates for these and other races can be found in the Erik Manning spreadsheet, where the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie. Next week is the start of early voting so barring anything really unexpected this will be the end of my interviews for this cycle. Primary season will be upon us soon, so I’ll be back in the saddle for that. I will wrap up with CD18 tomorrow.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Interview with Christian Menefee

Harris County sues over Solar For All funds

Good.

Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee filed a lawsuit Monday contesting the Trump administration’s cancellation of more than $400 million in solar energy grants earmarked for Texas-based organizations.

The federal funding, part of a $7 billion Biden-era program known as Solar for All, was meant to help lower-income families access solar panels and battery storage systems. It was expected to save participants an estimated $1,740 annually on their utility bills, county officials said.

Across Texas, cities and nonprofits also planned to outfit community centers and minority-serving colleges with solar panels, so the technology’s potential to lower electricity bills and mitigate power outages could be shared with nearby neighborhoods.

But the funding’s fate was never secure after President Donald Trump took office in January and directed a barrage of government actions to batter renewable energy and unleash fossil fuels.

For months, Solar for All grants were frozen and then unfrozen as Texas-based organizations struggled to stand up their various programs. In August, the Environmental Protection Agency pulled the plug on Solar for All, citing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that Trump signed into law the previous month.

“The bottom line is this: EPA no longer has the authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive,” EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in August. “EPA is taking action to end this program for good.”

In his Monday lawsuit, Menefee stated that the Big Beautiful Bill gave the EPA no such authority to cancel the Solar for All grants, as those funds had already been legally committed to the program.

“EPA has time and again disparaged Solar for All… making plain its determination to shut them down by whatever means necessary — legal or not,” Menefee wrote in his legal complaint.

See here, here, and here for the background. As the story notes, there was another lawsuit filed by another group of plaintiffs, in Rhode Island, a week before this one. I was rooting for Harris County to sue when the grants were canceled, so I’m glad we’re doing it now. The county has had some success with these lawsuits this year, I hope that will continue.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Harris County sues over Solar For All funds

Endorsement watch: For some change in HISD

The Chron makes their endorsements in the three contested HISD trustee races.

It’s an odd election. It could even seem pointless. Right now, elected HISD trustees have little power, no vote and just a few minutes prioritized at the start of each board meeting to talk ahead of general public comment. But eventually, the state will select some of them — three at a time — to take their seats at the table. The end of the takeover will presumably rely in part on the ability of elected and appointed board members to govern productively together. Will HISD schools and voters be best served by a candidate that’s part of the End the Takeover slate endorsed by the Harris County Democratic Party? Or would it be smarter to pick incumbents who have played nice and promise to continue doing so when Morath comes looking?

Many parents have been frustrated with the state takeover of HISD, and understandably so. A takeover originally intended to target a handful of consistently failing schools was unexpectedly expanded to cover additional campuses. State-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles has often demonstrated an antagonistic attitude toward teachers’ and families’ articulable concerns. Despite those problems, the last thing anyone should want is a return to the old HISD ways, with a board that tolerated poor performance and failed to function as an effective governing unit. Voters should look for candidates who have the insight and disposition to build on the real improvements Miles has brought to HISD while sunsetting his least effective moves.

Along with experience and priorities, that balance is what we focused on when screening candidates for Districts V, VI and VII, which together cover much of the west and southwest parts of the city. They include some of the wealthiest and some of the most underserved campuses in the district.

Long story short, they picked Maria Benzon over Robbie McDonough in District V, Michael McDonough over incumbent Kendall Baker in VI, and incumbent Bridget Wade over Audrey Nath in VII. By their star rating system, that was two close calls – Benzon and Wade both rated as three and a half stars to R. McDonough and Nath’s three – and one blowout – M. McDonough got four stars to Baker’s two. I would certainly vote for Audrey Nath if I lived in that district, but McDonough over Baker may be the easiest call of any race outside of Cy-Fair ISD. Which reminds me to point you to the ever-useful Book-Loving Texans’ Guide to the November 2025 school board elections, brought to you by Franklin Strong. Read his analyses and share them with your friends.

Elsewhere, the Chron also has the 30 day campaign finance reports for the HISD races; note this is just for the contested races, as unopposed candidates are not required to file 30 day or 8 day reports. Again to sum up, no one has raised or spent a huge amount. With the exception of Baker, who had no fundraising activity to report, everyone raised between $14K and $31K, and with the exception of Wade, who dropped $17K in the period, spent less than $10K. Check that out, check out the July reports, and check out my interviews with these candidates:

Felicity Pereyra, HISD District I
Maria Benzon, HISD District V
Robbie McDonough, HISD District V
Michael McDonough, HISD District VI
Bridget Wade, HISD District VII
Audrey Nath, HISD District VII

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Interview with Isaiah Martin

Isaiah Martin

Next up for the special election in CD18 is Isaiah Martin, who like Amanda Edwards had filed to run in the 2024 primary while then-Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee was running for Houston Mayor, but then dropped out and endorsed Jackson Lee when she got back in following her loss in that race. Martin had previously worked for Rep. Jackson Lee, and while a student at UH he founded #ForTheStudents and spearheaded initiatives that tackled pressing issues such as campus voting access, food insecurity, and sexual assault support, and also advocated for TDECU Stadium to be used as a polling place for the 2020 election. Martin is the youngest candidate in the race and has a national following on TikTok. Here’s what we talked about:

PREVIOUSLY:

Felicity Pereyra, HISD District I
Bridget Wade, HISD District VII
Audrey Nath, HISD District VII
Maria Benzon, HISD District V
Michael McDonough, HISD District VI
Monica Flores Richart, HCC Distict I
Renee Jefferson Patterson, HCC District II
Desmond Spencer, HCC District II
Alejandra Salinas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Jordan Thomas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Dwight Boykins, Houston City Council At Large #4
Al Lloyd, Houston City Council At Large #4
Robbie McDonough, HISD District V
Amanda Edwards, CD18

More information about the candidates for these and other races can be found in the Erik Manning spreadsheet, where enchantment pours out of every door. Next week is the start of early voting so barring anything really unexpected this will be the end of my interviews for this cycle. Primary season will be upon us soon, so I’ll be back in the saddle for that. More from CD18 tomorrow.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Interview with Isaiah Martin

Why is HPD calling ICE so much more often now?

We deserve some answers.

Houston police officers have called federal immigration agents on civilians over 100 times since President Donald Trump took office in January — a jump of more than 1,000% from any of the previous five years, according to public records obtained by the Houston Chronicle.

The majority of those 107 calls to Immigration and Customs Enforcement came as the result of a traffic stop. In only three offense reports — for responses to domestic violence, aggravated robbery and narcotics complaints — did officers indicate that the subject had been suspected of a serious crime.

Incident reports indicate that ICE came to arrest the subject in at least one out of four cases. Those numbers could be higher, however, as many incident reports lack details about why the subject was stopped or whether ICE responded.

By comparison, Houston police called ICE nine times in 2024 — the most of any year prior to Trump’s second term in office, records show. Police officials didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about their cooperation with ICE.

Local immigration advocates say the department’s willingness to involve ICE in non-criminal proceedings could deter immigrants, who make up more than a quarter of the city’s residents, from reporting crimes to law enforcement. Already this summer, Houston police officers called ICE on a Salvadoran woman who reported her abusive ex-husband to police.

“The majority of these cases are non-criminal in nature,” said Zenobia Lai, executive director of the Houston Immigration Legal Services Collaborative. “And that is very concerning for many reasons, one being that victims of crime or domestic violence will be very hesitant in contacting the police for help when they actually need it.”

Mayor John Whitmire has long maintained that the department will hold violent criminals accountable and assist crime victims regardless of their immigration status, and that the Houston Police Department would not get involved in immigration enforcement as Trump embarked on a nationwide crackdown.

However, he has also said that local officers are required to contact an arresting agency when they come across a person with a warrant. And after immigration authorities this year added roughly 700,000 people with administrative warrants — many of which are for outstanding deportation orders — to a national law enforcement database historically reserved for major crimes, those encounters have skyrocketed.

The question of whether local officers are legally obligated to notify federal agents about administrative warrants is a murky one. Unlike judicial warrants, which are signed by a judge, administrative warrants are issued by ICE officers and do not by themselves compel other agencies to action.

In an internal email sent to police supervisors earlier this year, Executive Chief Thomas Hardin detailed the department’s policy to call ICE when officers encounter someone with an administrative warrant. It instructs officers to check whether ICE will send an agent to the scene.

No federal law obligates local police to report subjects with an administrative warrant. While Texas has passed state laws that require law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, the law doesn’t explicitly demand that officers call ICE whenever they encounter an immigrant living in the country illegally.

You’re not alone if you’re confused by all that. The story indicates that a small number of officers are responsible for a significant number of the ICE calls, including one traffic patrol officer who leads the way with eight such calls. Maybe these guys are confused, or maybe they’re just doing their own thing, regardless of what the HPD policy is. Either way, that seems like a gap that should be addressed by HPD leadership and by the Mayor, who did not give a comment on this to the Chron. He’s been doing a lot of that no-commenting thing lately.

The one bit of good news here is that this is still a small number in absolute terms. But given the atrocities that ICE is committing every damn day, we can’t let that slide. If the Mayor doesn’t want to address the issue, he should be feeling the heat about it from City Council members, members of the Legislature, and everyone else. We don’t need HPD officers freelancing with ICE. Let’s get this under control while we still can.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, La Migra | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Why is HPD calling ICE so much more often now?

A brief recap of the whole rainbow crosswalk situation

Let me see if I’ve got this right: Greg Abbott gets his knickers in a twist over the recently-repainted rainbow crosswalk on Westheimer at Taft, after having been spun up about it by some online wingnuts. These crosswalks are no longer “compliant” with federal transit regulations because the babies in the current administration are triggered by them.

So then Metro preemptively surrenders after Mayor Whitmire kept his mouth shut, at least publicly, about the whole thing, which made people that Metro and the Mayor didn’t care about mad and also made the Chronicle mad. San Antonio, meanwhile, said um, yeah, we’ll get back to you and continued about their business. So far, nothing has happened to them or their still-existing rainbow crosswalks.

Have I missed anything? In the end, the best thing anyone said about this was on the Weird Sh*t in the Heights (Houston) Facebook group:

Do with that what you see fit.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Interview with Amanda Edwards

Amanda Edwards

This week we will focus on the election we’ve been waiting for the longest, the special election in CD18 to fill the seat left vacant by the death of Rep. Sylvester Turner. There’s a big field for this race but there’s really only a few names that stand out, and I’ll have interviews with them this week. First up is the candidate who ran for this seat in 2024, Amanda Edwards. I spoke to her then for that race and you can listen to that here. I’m taking a slightly different approach to these interviews, focusing primarily on fighting back against the depredations of the Trump regime and how we rebuild and restore the country we’re trying not to lose in the meantime. You’ll hear about that in all of these conversations. Edwards was the first person I interviewed for this round, and as was the case for the 2024 primary she is a Houston native and attorney who served as an At Large City Council member from 2015 to 2019, which included a stint on the H-GAC Transportation Policy Council, and also worked in the late Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s office. Here’s our conversation:

PREVIOUSLY:

Felicity Pereyra, HISD District I
Bridget Wade, HISD District VII
Audrey Nath, HISD District VII
Maria Benzon, HISD District V
Michael McDonough, HISD District VI
Monica Flores Richart, HCC Distict I
Renee Jefferson Patterson, HCC District II
Desmond Spencer, HCC District II
Alejandra Salinas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Jordan Thomas, Houston City Council At Large #4
Dwight Boykins, Houston City Council At Large #4
Al Lloyd, Houston City Council At Large #4
Robbie McDonough, HISD District V

More information about the candidates for these and other races can be found in the Erik Manning spreadsheet, where you’ll never walk alone. Next week is the start of early voting so barring anything really unexpected this will be the end of my interviews for this cycle. Primary season will be upon us soon, so I’ll be back in the saddle for that. More from CD18 tomorrow.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Interview with Amanda Edwards

30-day campaign finance reports: City Council At Large #4

We’re less than a month out from Election Day, and that means that the candidates in the special election for Houston City Council At Large #4 need to file 30 day finance reports. The July reports included reports from two candidates, Jordan Thomas and Alejandra Salinas, though only Salinas had something to report. Here’s what we’ve got for the 30 days:


Candidate     Raised       Spent       Loan     On Hand
=======================================================
Plummer          174      23,734          0       4,586

Boykins      108,996      20,053          0      88,942
Salinas      197,272     189,469     25,000     273,618
Thomas        18,244           0          0
Rivera         2,289         383     10,500      12,450
Lloyd          3,790       6,720      5,000
Dixon          6,595         341          0
Thibodeaux       509         850          0         485

Letitia Plummer’s report, which is the first one I’ve seen filed by her since the 2023 election, has a “submit date” of September 3, and it says it covers the July-December 2024 period. Go figure. At least now we have some idea of what she has in her treasury, though of course she could have raised a bunch more this year. At this point, unless she files another city report, the next chance we’ll have to find out will be January. I’m including it here as a point of reference when we look at the county reports then.

Only seven of the candidates had reports filed in the system. With three exceptions, all of their forms were screwed up in one way or another. Jordan Thomas properly totaled and itemized his contributions, but had nothing about expenditures. Martina Lemond Dixon, who has run for city office before, had a blank summary page, contribution and expenditure numbers on the subtotals page, and no itemizations. Al Lloyd had a blank summary page but did appear to correctly list his numbers on the subtotals page, and he did itemize them. Sonia Rivera gave her contribution and expenditure totals in the wrong boxes on the summary page, then had different contribution numbers (cash plus in kind) on the subtotals page; she too did at least itemize them. Those two came the closest to getting it right.

Dwight Boykins, Alejandra Salinas, and Angie Thibodeaux had reports that at least looked like they were correctly filled in. Boykins got contributions from former State Reps. Helen Giddings of Dallas and Glenn Lewis of Fort Worth, plus a few PACs including the Houston Apartment Association and the Texas Realtors. Salinas’ report included quite a few familiar Dem names, including former State Rep. and Council Member Ellen Cohen, current State Rep. Christina Morales, and current HISD Trustee Placido Gomez; she also got contributions from several labor PACs and a number of law firms. Thibodeaux’s one contribution appears to have been from her previous campaign for State Rep. Most of her expenditures were made from personal funds.

To the extent that people will vote for names they recognize, it sure looks like those Salinas and Boykins are the frontrunners. Salinas, who has been running online ads, has enough funds to do a reasonable amount of outreach. Boykins has solid name ID and enough to do some advertising. The rest face steeper challenges. I’ll check again at the eight day deadline to see if anything changes.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 30-day campaign finance reports: City Council At Large #4