Today, the Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, upheld injunctions in two related cases against the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) and Commissioner Masters, barring them from implementing the agency’s rule expanding the definition of child abuse to presumptively treat the provision of gender-affirming care as child abuse.
The injunctions bar DFPS from implementing the rule by investigating these families based solely on allegations that they are providing gender-affirming care to their adolescents, or taking any action in open investigations other than to close them so long DFPS can do so without making further contact with the families.
Today’s ruling came in two lawsuits, Doe v. Abbott and PFLAG v. Abbott, filed by Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union Jon L. Stryker and Slobodan Randjelović LGBTQ & HIV Project, the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, the ACLU of Texas, and the law firm of Baker Botts LLP.
“Texas PFLAG families are grateful that the court has once again recognized the harm caused by investigating parents for affirming and loving their transgender kids,” said Brian K. Bond (he/him), CEO of PFLAG National. “PFLAG National and our members and supporters will continue leading with love, just as we’ve done for the last 51 years, because when courageous love takes action, our families are stronger, our communities are safer, and our LGBTQ+ loved ones across races, places, and genders thrive.”
“We are gratified that the Court upheld the district court’s injunctions protecting families of transgender young people across the state from unlawful investigations under the DFPS rule,” said Paul D. Castillo, Senior Counsel, Lambda Legal. “The Court recognized yet again that being subjected to an unlawful and unwarranted investigation causes irreparable harm for these families who are doing nothing more than caring for and affirming their children and seeking the best course of care for them in consultation with their medical providers.”
“Transgender youth have always existed and always will, and the vast majority of Texans do not support separating them from their families or taking away their life-saving health care,” said Ash Hall (they/them), LGBTQIA+ Policy and Advocacy Strategist with the ACLU of Texas. “The maneuvers by Texas state officials against transgender youth are bullying masquerading as policy. Nothing could be further from abuse than parents loving and supporting their transgender children. This decision is another much-needed victory for trans youth and those who love and support them.”
“We are grateful the court saw through this dangerous and transparently discriminatory action by Texas officials,” said Chase Strangio, Deputy Director for Transgender Justice at the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project. “Our clients and countless families like theirs are guided by love and compassion for their transgender youth, following the guidance of their doctors and fighting for the futures their family deserves. These baseless and invasive investigations are a dangerous abuse of the state’s power and one we’re thankful the Texas courts have consistently ruled against.”
Read today’s decisions here: PFLAG-Decision.pdf (lambdalegal.org) and Doe-Decision.pdf (lambdalegal.org)
Read more about the two lawsuits here: https://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/pflag-v-abbott and https://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/doe-v-abbott
Read more about PFLAG and its support of transgender youth and Texas families: https://pflag.org/resource/texas-faq/
See here and here for some background, and here for a statement from Amber Briggle, one of the parents/plaintiffs. This is a nice companion to the injunction in the other PFLAG lawsuit, and as with that I didn’t see any news coverage of it as I drafted the post. I’ll update with a link when I find one. This will of course go to SCOTx, and I’m less optimistic there, not to mention that the next Legislature can affect things even more. But for now, a reason to be happy.
UPDATE: And here’s KXAN with the story.