It’s drug testing all the way down

Looks like the urinalysis industry in this state is going to get a big stimulus package next year, at least if the Republicans get their way.

As top state leaders push to drug-test some Texans seeking jobless benefits and financial assistance, critics suggest the initiative would single out the powerless and hurt their children.

It’s a battle that has been played out in other states – most prominently in Florida, where a drug-testing program for welfare applicants was stalled by a constitutional challenge saying it amounted to an unreasonable search.

Backers of Texas’ proposal cite its narrow scope, since a leading bill targeting welfare recipients would limit testing to applicants deemed high-risk for drug use. Those who failed the test and lost benefits could reapply in a year or, if they underwent drug treatment, six months.

“The reality is, no one wants to see any Texan using drugs,” said state Rep. Sylvester Turner, D-Houston. But he’s a critic of the proposal, contending the poor and jobless are being singled out “because of politics, and not because of reasonable, rational policy.”

“Whether you are receiving governmental assistance on welfare, whether you are a student receiving a Texas grant, whether you are an executive, a CEO, that’s up here asking for money from the Enterprise Fund – I don’t want to see anybody using drugs inappropriately. Now the question for me is why are we singling out this population?” he asked.

I think we all know the answer to that question. This is a no-brainer for Rick Perry et al – it plays well to the cheap seats, it sounds like something that would save money, and who’s going to stand against them on behalf of drug users? You can’t ask for much more than that.

Maurice Emsellem, policy co-director for the National Employment Law Project, said federal legislation allows testing only for claimants terminated from their most recent employment due to unlawful use of controlled substances, or those for whom suitable work is only available in an occupation that regularly drug tests.

The U.S. Department of Labor is developing regulations to allow states to implement these provisions. It appears the first would be a tough one in Texas, which restricts benefits to those who have lost a job through no fault of their own.

Andy Hogue, spokesman for Texas Workforce Commissioner Tom Pauken, who supports such drug testing, said it’s estimated the cost of testing for jobless applications would be about $12.1 million over five years. He said it’s projected the stricter requirements would save the Unemployment Insurance program in Texas $20.7 million in that period.

I seriously doubt we’ll see the kind of savings that Andy Hogue projects. I admit I have no evidence to back up this assertion, I just have no reason to trust such a self-serving projection. If this gets passed by the Lege and doesn’t get blocked by the courts, I’ll be very interested to see how that projection pans out. Bear in mind, of course, that four million bucks a year is chump change in an $80 billion budget – it’s not much more than Rick Perry spends on travel and security. Again, it’s all about priorities being out of whack.

Related Posts:

This entry was posted in Budget ballyhoo and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to It’s drug testing all the way down

  1. Michael says:

    It will be interesting to see how this plays out against the states that are liberalizing their drug laws. If you can show,that you didn’t use drugs except in a jurisdiction where it has been legalized, can you get off on the technicality of not having broken the law?

  2. Michael says:

    I like the idea of testing every C-level officer of every corporation that applies for Corporate Welfare or tax breaks as a part of this.

  3. Michael says:

    I like the idea of testing every C-level officer of every corporation that applies for Corporate Welfare or tax breaks as a part of this.

  4. strangefriend says:

    One problem of drug testing is false positives. Marijuana tests have false positives for:
    Ibuprofen; (Advil, Nuprin, Motrin, Excedrin IB etc)
    Naproxen (Aleve)
    Ketoprofen (arthritis medicine)
    Promethazine (antihistamine)
    Pantoprazole (reflux medicine)
    Riboflavin (B2, Hempseed Oil)
    Kidney infection (Kidney disease, diabetes) Liver Disease
    Baby Soaps and Shampoos (Cotten SW, et al., 2012)

    The resent scandal with the Harris County Probation Dept. should give one pause about drug testing.

  5. Robert Nagle says:

    Shouldn’t we also have mandatory drug testing every 3 months for every state employee (including the governor)? It’s only fair.

Comments are closed.