Off the Kuff Rotating Header Image

More on the Lyft and Uber entrances

It’s a new day in Houston for people who need a ride.

Brian Walts was out until about 3 a.m. Friday hitting the clubs, but he didn’t have a single drink or set foot on a dance floor.

Rather, he was driving two gents home from the Washington Avenue area for free, hoping that by giving away an Uber trip, he might gain some customers for the service.

Uber and its competitor Lyft charged into the Houston ridesharing market in the past two days under the watchful eye of Houston officials who warned that the companies cannot accept payment until the city changes its rules governing taxis and limos.

For the companies, it’s a chance to earn some street cred with locals and gain some attention. Houston residents looking for a lift benefit from free trips within Loop 610.

For drivers like Walts, paid by the hour by the companies until they can make money based on their trips, it’s a chance to ease into their new role. For the customer, the experience is somewhere between calling a cab and bumming a ride from a friend.

Walts is hoping that collecting riders in his 2013 Hyundai can be a second job on top of his full-time gig as an account manager for a security technology company.

“It’s easy to do, especially if you’re a native,” he said on a spin through downtown.


Taxi companies have argued the companies are skirting established rules and do not live by the same strict standards governing taxi and limo companies.

Even giving away rides has been questioned. Yellow Cab spokeswoman Cindy Clifford argued that if a driver is paid to transport passengers, he or she is operating a “vehicle for hire” even if someone other than the customer is paying.

The city’s position, however, is that the trips are lawful as long as no money is exchanged, said Christopher Newport, chief of staff for the city’s regulatory affairs office.

The main thing that we learn – or at least, that I learned – from this story is that Uber, and I presume Lyft, will be paying drivers an hourly wage for the time that rides are free to users. That answers my question about why anyone would want to do the driving during that time, but still leaves open the matter of how long the companies will be willing to do this. Seven weeks is a long time, and delays are always possible. Be that as it may, here they are. We’ll see how well they’re received by the public.

Related Posts:


  1. Chris Van Dyk says:

    Money changed hands. The dispatch company paid the driver for his services. There are all sorts of questions raisedincluding whether the drivers insurance was void because he was using his private vehicle for a commercial purpose.

  2. Lauren says:

    Don’t forget about The Wave, operating inside the Loop, flat FIXED rate of $15/pp for the whole night so no surprises there, drivers who are licensed by the City, vehicles and insurance inspected by the City. Maximum # of hrs to drive in place for safety of passengers. App to launch late this week! #morepeoplefewervehicles

  3. Kevin says:

    From my understanding, if Walt pulled into a bar and dropped of his clients, his temporary commercial insurance would no longer be in effect. Then, if he hit someone on his way out of the area, his personal insurance would not be in effect either as he was using his car for commercial purposes. That is sort of scary. I see that the Wave is mentioned in one of these comments. I am pretty sure that it’s insurance would be in effect 24/7 while driving down Washington.