The case for calling a Harvey special session

Rep. Gene Wu disagrees with Greg Abbott’s decision.

Rep. Gene Wu

The historic level of damage and suffering caused by Harvey requires that we tap into our state’s Rainy Day Fund. Gov. Greg Abbott’s decision to not call a special session of the Texas Legislature to access emergency funding will worsen the long-term economic effects of one of the most powerful storms to ever land on our shores.

Abbott has stated that there is no need for a special session, implicitly saying that there is no need to tap into the Economic Stabilization Fund — our state’s savings account, commonly known as the Rainy Day Fund — and that existing resources are sufficient to deal with the widespread devastation caused by Harvey.

However, if there has been one lesson that I’ve learned in my three terms in the Legislature, it’s that existing resources are never adequate in Texas. Our schools continue to be some of the worst funded in the nation, half of our rural hospitals are on the verge of closing, and we barely maintain our existing infrastructure. Texas mostly skates by on a combination of luck and creative accounting. But more importantly, what we have budgeted for are common occurrences and normal disasters. The historic level of damage from Harvey is anything but common.


The Rainy Day Fund is available right now. The Texas Legislature needs to only meet for a few days and send a bill to the governor to access the funds. There is strong bipartisan support because members understand the desperate need for a quick response. In this past legislative session, conservative members argued that the fund should not be used for “reoccurring” expenses because we needed to save it for one-time emergencies. This is that emergency.

The state could provide immediate, low-interest or no-interest small loans to help businesses rebuild quickly. The money could go to help Houston ISD to repair the more than 200 schools that suffered flood damage, including 53 with critical damage. Harris County could use the funds to expedite repairs so that courts and the jury assembly center are not closed for the next three months. Outside of the Houston area, entire cities need to be rebuilt. Simply leaving local counties and municipalities on their own to rebuild means a slower recovery — possibly causing businesses to close or leave our state, and taking jobs with them.

See here for the background. I guess I’m not fully clear on what the Legislative Budget Board can and cannot do, and what gaps there would be if only the LBB gets to act. I do think Rep. Wu is right on about appropriating money to the schools and school districts that have been heavily damaged by Harvey. I can’t think of a better use of Rainy Day Fund money than to make schools safe and available for students again. Again, if the LBB can do this, great. It will be a lot less messy that way – I mean, if you think the jackasses of the Freedom Caucus won’t try to screw with an emergency appropriations bill for school repairs, I have to ask what Legislature you’ve been watching – but if the LBB can’t do that, then a special session it needs to be.

Related Posts:

This entry was posted in Hurricane Katrina, That's our Lege and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The case for calling a Harvey special session

  1. General Grant says:

    Interesting how Perry’s bizarre and incorrect view of the Economic Stabilization Fund, that it was a disaster relief fund, seems to have been uncritically adopted.

  2. Bill Daniels says:


    When you euphemistically call something a “rainy day fund,” you can understand how people might actually think it’s a rainy day fund, for when something bad happens, like the oil market crashing…..or Harvey crashing into Texas. Overall, though, Perry was an embarrassment to Texas.

  3. General Grant says:

    I actually agree. My point is that Perry actually managed to win this point, and that by doing so even the Democrats are conceding that the fund will never be used for its original purpose of smoothing out the effects of economic fluctuations on the budget.

    In fact, reading the whole statement I am generally startled by Rep. Wu’s willingness to engage in this issue while not really challenging the prevailing Budget premises.

  4. C.I. says:

    It seems while the conservatives, Straus is a RINO, want a smaller leaner govenment, liberals try anything to increase their payments to their criminal friends in prison….

Comments are closed.