So what do we think final 2019 turnout will be?

Let’s take the numbers we have so far and try to hone in a bit more exactly on what to expect tomorrow, shall we? I’m going to go back a little farther into the past and establish some patterns.

2019
2015
2013
2011
2009
2007


Year    Early    Mail   Total   Mailed
======================================
2019  137,460  15,304  152,764   26,824
2015  164,104  29,859  193,963   43,280
2013   87,944  21,426  109,370   30,572
2011   49,669   8,676   58,345   15,264
2009   71,368   9,148   80,516   20,987
2007   43,420   6,844   50,264   13,870

Year    Early    Final   Early%
===============================
2015  193,963  421,460    46.0%
2013  109,370  260,437    42.0%
2011   58,345  164,971    35.4%
2009   80,516  257,312    31.3%
2007   50,264  193,945    25.9%

Couple of points to note up front. One is that the early vote totals I report above are the totals as of the end of the early voting period. Mail ballots continue to arrive, however, so the mail ballot results you see on the election return pages on the County Clerk website are a bit higher. I’m basing the calculations here on those as-of-Friday results, for consistency’s sake.

Second, note that while early voting in even year races is now a large majority of the total vote – in 2018, for example, about 71% of all votes were cast before Election Day – in municipal elections, it remains the case that most voters take their time and do their business on Tuesday. The early vote share has steadily increased over time, and it wouldn’t surprise me if we’re at least at 50-50 now, but the bottom line is that there are very likely still a lot more votes to be cast.

Note also the increase in mail ballots over time, both in terms of mail ballots sent out and mail ballots returned. The HCDP has made a priority of this since Lane Lewis was elected Chair in 2012 and continuing under Lillie Schechter, and you can see that reflected in the totals beginning in 2013. I’m not exactly sure why the numbers took a dip this year, but they remain well above what they were prior to 2013.

All this is a long preamble to the main question, which is what to expect tomorrow. Here are three scenarios for you:

2019 at 45% early = 339,476 in Harris County, 231,862 in Houston.
2019 at 50% early = 305,428 in Harris County, 208,676 in Houston.
2019 at 55% early = 277,753 in Harris County, 189,705 in Houston.

The second number in each of those lines represents the fact that the numbers we have are for all of Harris County, while per Keir Murray about 68% of this year’s turnout is from the city of Houston. I used his figure in projecting the Houston numbers. Sixty-eight percent of Harris County votes coming from Houston is a bit higher than it was in 2015 and 2013, which were in the 64-65% range, but it’s well within historic norms, where the city vote percent has topped 70% in some years.

My best guess is that we’re headed for something like the middle scenario. I see no reason why the trend of an increasing early vote share wouldn’t continue, so I’d expect it to notch up a couple more points. For what it’s worth, in the 2017 election, when there were no city of Houston races, about 41.3% of the vote was cast early. That race doesn’t fit this pattern so I’m not taking it into consideration, but I figured someone reading this would be wondering about it, so there you have it.

Beyond that, I expect the Mayor’s race to go to a runoff, with Turner getting in the low to mid-forties and Buzbee getting in the mid to upper-twenties. There is a 100% certainty that I will keep the remote close at hand to avoid being subjected to any further Buzbee commercials when I’m just trying to watch a football game. I expect the Metro referendum to pass. I have no idea what else to expect. Feel free to leave your guesses in the comments.

Related Posts:

This entry was posted in Election 2019 and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to So what do we think final 2019 turnout will be?

  1. Manny says:

    Busbee will be in the lower 20s maybe teens, King could be a surprise. Normally when two candidates engage in negative the third party tends to benefit.

  2. Mainstream says:

    I am guessing 320,000 for the county and 220,000 for the City. I think a few voters are agonizing over which anti-Turner candidate is most viable, and I think the news that you can vote anywhere in the county on election day may lead schoolteachers and other workers who work far from where they live to wait and vote near their workplaces on election day. I also think African-American turnout will tick up on election day.

  3. Mainstream says:

    I am guessing 320,000 for the county and 220,000 for the City. I think a few voters are agonizing over which anti-Turner candidate is most viable, and I think the news that you can vote anywhere in the county on election day may lead schoolteachers and other workers who work far from where they live to wait and vote near their workplaces on election day. I also think African-American turnout will tick up on election day. I think King will be closer to Buzbee than polling has suggested, but I still think Turner has a shot at winning without a runoff. I think Orlando Sanchez could come close to an upset, but I could see at least 2 of the at large incumbents narrowly forced into a runoff.

  4. Joel says:

    I was shocked to have to wait in line to vote today. My polling place (bigger than a precinct) posted thousands of voters.

    My theory is that it was the state income tax amendment that reliably brought out the (self) haters, who probably voted exactly the opposite way I would have liked them to … on everything.

  5. Michael says:

    Turns out vote centers might have boosted turnout

Comments are closed.