Endorsement? What endorsement?

NASA says that when their administrator whispered sweet nothings about Tom DeLay in front of an audience, it wasn’t really an endorsement.

Five days after NASA administrator Michael Griffin urged a Houston audience to keep U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay in office, a spokesman denied Wednesday that Griffin had made a formal campaign endorsement.

“The space program has had no better friend in its entire existence than Tom DeLay,” Griffin said Friday of DeLay’s legislative support of the agency. “He’s still with us and we need to keep him there.”

With DeLay present, Griffin spoke at the annual Space Center Rotary Club of Houston’s nonprofit National Award for Space Achievement Foundation gala.

Griffin had no intention of soliciting votes for the 11-term lawmaker, NASA spokesman Dean Acosta said.

“He did not make an endorsement and will not get involved in any political campaigns,” Acosta said. “If his words of thanks to Tom DeLay were misconstrued as an endorsement, then he regrets that.”

Uh huh. And why does this matter?

Under the Hatch Act, executive branch employees such as Griffin are permitted to express an opinion, campaign and make speeches for or against candidates in partisan elections — when they are off-duty.

The black-tie awards dinner at which Griffin made his remarks was held after regular working hours, but Griffin was representing the space agency and giving an award to a NASA employee, astronaut Eileen Collins.

Griffin’s travel to Houston from Washington, D.C., for the dinner was paid by NASA rather than the Rotary Club, said event organizer Floyd Bennett of the United Space Alliance.

The independent Office of Special Counsel, which administers the Hatch Act, will investigate the matter, spokesman Loren Smith said.

Employees who violate the Hatch Act can be removed from office, according to the Office of Special Counsel, or suspended without pay.

It’s like there’s a vortex around DeLay that causes everyone around him to do things that get them in trouble.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
This entry was posted in Election 2006. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Endorsement? What endorsement?

  1. This is ridiculous.

    I am sure after the endorsement, NASA receieved hundreds of cals from liberals angry at it, so they had to release this statement.

    “He’s still with us and we need to keep him there.”

    That can’t be misconstrude as anything except an endorsement, which it was.

  2. Dennis says:

    Of course the explanation is absurd – we can read and understand the plain meaning of Griffin’s words. Clearly he was making a political endorsement of Tom DeLay. Based on his reputation and scientific expertise, I had hoped for better than this from Griffin.

Comments are closed.