Council shakeup

Things are getting mighty interesting down at City Hall.

Mayor Annise Parker has parted ways with two major conservatives on the Houston City Council, removing Councilman Mike Sullivan from his role overseeing redistricting and accepting the resignation of Councilwoman Anne Clutterbuck as mayor pro tem.

The development, which stems, in part, from a recent spat over who would be appointed to serve as a Port of Houston Authority commission member, comes at a critical time for Parker, who is about to confront three issues that are expected to greatly test her ability to rally the council’s support.

Passing an extremely tight 2012 budget, a drainage fee mandated by popular vote and redrawing the lines of City Council boundaries could become far more difficult as her allies dwindle at City Hall.

The issue also apparently is tied to concern among Parker’s senior staff that Clutterbuck is gearing up to oppose her in 2011, the councilwoman said. She denied any interest in challenging the mayor.


Clutterbuck denied interest in Parker’s job.

“I find it unfortunate that questions like that are asked in her own office because they are a distraction from the real work that needs to get done,” she said.

Not the strongest denial I’ve ever heard, but never mind. A few people have told me in recent days that they’ve heard CM Clutterbuck is planning a challenge to Mayor Parker. What I know is that there are always more potential candidates for Mayor than there are actual candidates, and until someone designates a treasurer or takes some other formal step it’s all just rumor. Doesn’t mean there’s nothing to it, but it doesn’t mean much more until there’s something other than just talk to point to.

I should also note, by the way, that Clutterbuck isn’t the only current member of Council who is rumored to be running for Mayor next year. I know many people who believe that CM Bradford also has his eyes on the office. Again, it’s all just talk now, but in this case that talk has been around for awhile.

The port commission vote, in which the mayor’s preferred candidate was rejected by a majority of council, was “indicative of her inability to strongarm this council into doing what she wants done,” Sullivan said.

“It’s a precursor of more to come. We have very strong council members who have worked with another administration that was much more diplomatic and much more concerned about council issues than this mayor is. I think that is showing in the vote.”

Sullivan said the mayor told him Friday about her plans to run the redistricting process and was removing the issue from his committee out of retaliation for his vote to reappoint Janiece Longoria as port commissioner.

The councilman had given her repeated assurances he would vote for Parker candidate Dean Corgey last month but changed his mind after hearing from several influential Houston conservatives, he said.

Sullivan has been pretty openly critical of the Mayor recently, so the Longoria thing may just be the tipping point. His implicit comparison to Mayor Bill White is at least somewhat unfair, since Mayor White had the good fortune to take over during much better economic times; it’s a lot easier for everyone to get along when you’re not having to talk about furloughs and tax increases and so forth. One hopes Mayor Parker will get to experience some of that in her subsequent terms. Greg has more.

On a side note, I have an observation to make about the Port of Houston Commission, since that was apparently the catalyst for the falling out between Parker and Sullivan. The Port of Houston has seven appointed Commissioners:

The city of Houston and the Harris County Commissioners Court each appoint two commissioners. These two governmental entities jointly appoint the chairman of the Port Commission. The Harris County Mayors & Councils Association and the city of Pasadena each appoint one commissioner.

Ms. Longoria, who was re-appointed by Council against the Mayor’s preferences, is the sole Hispanic on the Commission. The other City of Houston appointee, Kase Lawal, is the sole African-American, and is the other City of Houston appointee. The other four, plus the Chair – four white guys and Elyse Lanier – were appointed by Commissioners Court, the Harris County Mayors & Councils Association, and the city of Pasadena. In other words, the City of Houston is 100% responsible for the diversity on this governing body. Call me crazy, but I don’t see why this should be the case. Perhaps the next time that Commissioners Court, the Harris County Mayors & Councils Association, or the city of Pasadena has to appoint or reappoint someone they might be persuaded to pick someone other than another white guy. Perhaps some of the people who expressed such a strong preference for Ms. Longoria could express that wish to Commissioners Court, the Harris County Mayors & Councils Association, and the city of Pasadena as well. Just a thought.

Related Posts:

This entry was posted in Local politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Council shakeup

  1. tired dog says:

    Odd, I didn’t realize that Sullivan & Clutterbuck qualified as conservatives. Clutterbuck of ‘I don’t want those unwashed voters anywhere near a public policy quesiton’ vis a vis prop 3, and Sullivan who has dutifully voted with the mayor 99% or more are hardly conservative. Well, maybe in San Fran, or is CoH now San Fran east? Bradford for mayor? Geez, just go collect your pension Clarence.

  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention Council shakeup – Off the Kuff --

  3. JJ says:

    Here’s my take: How many people does Clutterbuck have to deny this rumor to? Don’t you think she also denied it before the quote you cited? THEN she went on to make the important point that the Mayor is screwing up everything she touches, although she was polite enough to blame what every single person at City Hall thinks is the most incompetent staff in memory. (I bet you can ask anyone allied with the Mayor and be told that. Ask Lovell. Ask Noreiga. Ask Gonzalez.) The important point is that the Mayor isn’t taking action on so many things. I am told she spends all her time alienating allies and people who would prefer to work with her because she isnt GOVERNING, she is playing politics and payback and traveling all over the country, and worrying “oh no, who is running against me?”. The reason you have heard from a lot of people about Clutterbuck running is exactly the reason Clutterbuck said — it all comes from the Mayor!!!. (well, there are also all the horribly disappointed people involved in city politics who voted for Parker and now are grasping at straws as to how to get out of this mess, and they started picking up on the Mayor’s paranoia and thinking “hmm, now there’s a solution…”)

    And then the 2nd part — the Mayor punishes Sullivan who has voted with her 5 times more than Jolanda Jones has? She threatens him and uses the word “Siberia”? And really, the linch pin of her strategy to put a union guy on the port was a republican from Kingwood? She thought that would work well? Who told her not to do that, who tried to avoid her being humiliated? Let’s see… Clutterbuck, her now ex mayor pro tem, and every other person who the mayor should view as wanting to help her: Rodriguez, Lovell, Noriega… But no, the Mayor instead cast her lot and made her stand with Jolanda Jones, who took point on that whole port fiasco. And with that “staff” who Clutterbuck criticized. And their post-loss spin was to put all the blame on Sullivan??!!!

    I’d laugh if I didn’t want to cry over how far the Mayor has fallen and how she has squandered an entire year, how disappointed so many at city hall are with her. Just sad.

    (Kuff is right about port diversity, but in my mind that just makes the Mayor a bigger idiot for the stance she took.)

  4. Sayswho says:

    I agree with commenter “JJ” and especially on the point of potential opponents. The only people spreading rumors about any challenge to her are the Mayor’s staff – not from anyone else. At some point we all expected the Administration to drop the politics and govern but it has not happened yet. Here’s hoping she makes a New Year’s resolution to engage Council Members and not pick unnecessary fights all the time.

  5. Pingback: A very early look at the 2011 elections – Off the Kuff

Comments are closed.