Some good news here.
Supporters of Houston’s contentious equal rights ordinance raked in $1.26 million during seven weeks of official fundraising, more than doubling opponents’ efforts and fueling a fierce and frenzied media campaign to court voters before the law hits the November ballot.
In campaign finance reports filed Monday that reflect late summer totals, both sides spent more than $550,000, largely on dueling TV and radio ads. But the more than $521,000 that supporters of the law still had left in campaign coffers as of Sept. 25 dwarfed the $58,000 that opponents reported in cash-on-hand.
[…]
In the battle over the city’s equal rights ordinance, Jared Woodfill, spokesman for opponents, said the campaign is unfazed by supporters’ significant fundraising totals.
Opponents reported a $100,000 donation from conservative developer Al Hartman, $25,000 from Harris County Commissioner Jack Cagle and $5,000 from Houston state Rep. Gary Elkins, among others. Longtime anti-gay activist Steve Hotze also loaned the campaign $50,000.
“We’re absolutely not intimidated at this point,” Woodfill said. “I believe the momentum is in our favor and clearly this is an ordinance that the people in Houston don’t want.”
In a news release, the Houston Unites campaign said it expected to spend $2 million before the November election.
The campaign said 80 percent of its nearly 700 donors are Houston residents.
But its efforts were also fueled by big-ticket contributions from national groups and figures.
The Washington, D.C.- based Human Rights Campaign contributed more than $200,000, and New York philanthropist Jon Stryker, a frequent donor to LGBT causes, pitched in $100,000. Colorado’s Gill Action and New York-based American Unity Fund, both LGBT advocacy groups, donated a combined $200,000.
Campaign manager Richard Carlbom, in a written statement, said the group had “certainly done well on the money front so far.”
“But, there is a great sense of urgency around fundraising this week and next,” Carlbom said. “We know from past ballot campaigns that equal rights opponents spend significant dollars in the final weeks. We must remain competitive with them in what will, no doubt, be a close election.”
The story has some highlights of candidate finance reports as well. Those can be found here, same place as the July reports. Reports for PACs can be found on the usual city finance webpage – here’s the Advanced Search link; select either the “Specific-Purpose Political Committee” or “Both” radio button, then click the “Search” button next to the “Candidate/Committee” name boxes. Latest results are on the last pages, so go to page 4; the only relevant result on page 3 is for Brenda Stardig’s campaign PAC.
There are three PACs of interest regarding HERO. Two are pro-HERO: the Houston Unites Against Discrimination PAC and the Human Rights Campaign Houston Equal Rights PAC. One is anti-HERO, the Campaign for Houston PAC. There is a “No on Houston Prop 1” PAC that shows up in the search results, but it reports no funds raised or spent.
Here’s a summary of the reports for the three active PACs mentioned above:
PAC name Raised Spent Loans On Hand
==============================================================
Houston Unites 1,262,893 597,299 0 521,462
Human Rights Campaign 218,480 205,810 0 11,503
Campaign for Houston 274,785 492,231 50,000 18,494
Houston Unites had $901K in cash contributions and $359K in kind. It also reports $6,800 in loans on summary page 3, though I didn’t see any explanation of that. Some of their big donors are as follows:
Human Rights Campaign 205,810
Gill Action LLC 100,000
American Unity Fund 100,000
ACLU of Texas 95,000
Freedom For All Americans 50,000
Wes Milliken 50,000
Texas Freedom Network 25,000
Equality Texas 12,500
Annise Parker campaign 5,000
Robert Gallegos campaign 1,000
So basically, the HRC PAC was a passthrough, as all the funds they raised ($200K of which came from themselves) went to the Houston Unites PAC. A lot of these same big donors were also the main suppliers of in kind contributions, which mostly amounted to staff time and office space:
ACLU Texas 137,187
Freedom for All Americans 124,017
Human Rights Campaign 50,144
ACLU (national office) 16,750
Texas Freedom Network 15,139
Equality Texas 10,625
The expenses listed were fairly straightforward. About $360K was allocated for advertising. Some $158K was for consulting to a group called Block by Block; there were some smaller consultant expenses as well. There was about $37K for printing, and $5K for polling.
And here are the big donors for Campaign for Houston:
Allen R Hartman 100,000
Jack Cagle PAC 25,000
Ralph Schmidt 25,000
Mickey Ellis 20,000
Texans for Family Values PAC 10,000
Mac Haik Ford 10,000
Law Office of Melanie Flowers 10,000
Ryan Sitton 10,000
Anthony McCorvey 10,000
Johnny Baker 10,000
Edd Hendee 5,000
Paul Pressler 5,000
Dan Huberty 5,000
William Carl 5,000
Jay E. Mincks 5,000
Malcolm Morris 5,000
Gary Elkins 5,000
Dwayne Bohac 1,000
Jodie L. Jiles 1,000
Norman Adams 1,000
That’s $268K of the $275K they reported raising. Grassroots, they ain’t. There are some familiar names in this list. Jack Cagle is County Commissioner in Precinct 4. Ryan Sitton is a Railroad Commissioner. Dan Huberty, Gary Elkins, and Dwayne Bohac are all State Reps. Texans for Family Values is the main source of anti-gay wingnuttery at a state level. Edd Hendee is (was? I don’t listen to AM radio) a talk radio host and the owner of the Taste of Texas restaurant. I don’t recognize a lot of the other names, but I’m glad I’ve never bought a car from Mac Haik or sought legal services from Melanie Flowers.
The expense side of their report is weird. Two line items totaling $200,350.50 are to American Express for unitemized expenses. I mean, these are presumably credit card bills, so they could be for just about anything – office supplies, food, consulting expenses, strippers and porn downloads, who knows? It’s their responsibility – requirement, actually – to specify what these expenses are. My guess, if I were forced to make one, is that these are their line items for advertising costs, as there’s basically nothing else for that. But that’s just a guess, and I should note that while they listed $492,231 in total expenses on their summary page, the individual expense items only add up to $291,880. Is there an error in their form, or are there another $200K in expenditures they’re not reporting? Like I said, it’s on them to tell us. I for one will feel free to speculate wildly until they do so.
Those are the highlights for now. I am posting 30 day reports as I find them to the Election 2015 webpage. I’ll have a closer look at the reports for citywide candidates next week. Any questions about this, leave ’em in the comments.
It’s interesting that no women’s groups, no military organizations, etc., have donated…..only gay groups. Don’t all these other protected classes care? Or, perhaps, everyone else knows what this is really about. It’s almost like military status, pregnancy status, and the like, were tossed in as window dressing.
Well I didn’t donate to anyone. I for one will be glad when this election is over. On the bright side if it does pass then the world will not stop spinning and maybe I get some business off of the ordinance.
PK, if it passes, perhaps you can make coin from a challenge to the city’s affirmative action programs. Either equal is equal or it isn’t, yes?
Yep
Pingback: HRBC poll: Turner 24, King 18 – Off the Kuff