The Lone Star Rail idea never truly dies

I mean, it is a good idea, even if the obstacles seem to be impossible.

San Antonio and Austin, two of the fastest-growing U.S. cities, sit just 80 miles apart. That’s too close for regular flights and just far enough for a drive up Interstate 35 to be a real pain in the ass.

Among public transportation advocates, the distance between the two Texas cities is considered a sweet spot where reliable rail service isn’t just feasible but necessary.

With President Joe Biden’s signature “Build Back Better” bill allocating nearly $20 billion for rail transit, grassroots organizations — including San Antonians for Rail Transit and RESTART Lone Star Rail District — are popping up, pumping out petitions and grabbing the attention of local politicians.

“We are coalition-building right now, and our goal is to get different advocacy groups, nonprofits and even things like chambers of commerce to get on board and say, ‘Yes, we would benefit from a rail link between Austin and San Antonio,'” RESTART founder Clay Anderson said.

Indeed, a thesis published by one of Anderson’s former colleagues at Columbia University argues that a rail link connecting Austin and San Antonio would grab significant enough ridership to justify its expense.

However, the region has been down this road before. Business leaders spent decades talking about the idea, and the Lone Star Rail District, established to create such a line, crashed and burned in 2016 with little to show for the millions pumped into the entity.

Yeah, 2016, though there were a couple of mentions of a revival in 2019. I’ve been following this dream since 2009, though as noted the effort goes back much farther than that.

Again, it makes sense! Austin and San Antonio are close together. I-35 is a parking lot. The entire region is booming, with New Braunfels and San Marcos becoming regional powerhouses. There’s already a set of tracks! All that’s been missing is leadership, funding, vision, and consensus. No biggie.

Keep the dream alive, I say. It’s a good idea, and people will buy into it if they believe it’s an actual option. Maybe someday, with another federal infrastructure bill and a state government that wants to do something other than widen highways, it could happen. Hell, as long as we’re dreaming, we could extend that line farther south, too. It could happen, you never know. I wish them all well.

Related Posts:

This entry was posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Lone Star Rail idea never truly dies

  1. David Fagan says:

    And monkeys might fly out of my butt

  2. The relatively short distance works against this idea. Driving to the train station, paying to park your car, going through the check-in/luggage/security process, riding the train, and then having to rent a car, Uber, or take a bus at your destination is a lot of hassle/cost for just an 80 mile trip (especially if the train trip isn’t non-stop). It would be much easier for most people to just drive their own car or take a greyhound bus (which would probably be cheaper, with more scheduling options). When it comes to rail, freight is often prioritized over commuter trains (which is a big constraint). While trains always sound good, there is a reason Amtrak struggles to make a profit. This idea failed in 2016. I don’t see why it would succeed now.

  3. Joel says:

    :The relatively short distance works against this idea. Driving to the train station, paying to park your car, going through the check-in/luggage/security process, riding the train, and then having to rent a car, Uber, or take a bus at your destination is a lot of hassle/cost for just an 80 mile trip (especially if the train trip isn’t non-stop)”

    what if that 80 mile trip regularly takes 2 hours? when is the last time you made this drive?

  4. Joel, I suspect the 2 hour drive would still be faster than the overall time spent dealing with the train trip hassle, plus cheaper (no parking fee, no need for rental car or Uber when you get there, etc.). Besides, once you get on the train, the trip might not even be non-stop. People who don’t want to (or can’t) drive themselves would probably just take Greyhound (cheaper, with more scheduling options). The 80-mile train project sounds like it would struggle to turn an operational profit. Hey, I definitely could be wrong. Still, people usually choose the fastest, cheapest, easiest option, and that probably wouldn’t be the train.

Comments are closed.