This Chron story adds a dimension to the KTRU debate that I haven’t seen discussed before.
Classical music fans in the city’s southern and western suburbs may not be able to hear the station intended to serve their interests.
“It’s all static,” Clear Lake resident Jay Bennett said of the radio signal that would be designated for classical music and arts programming if the deal goes through. “It seems odd that they would degrade their (classical music) signal and alienate a lot of their listeners.”
[N]ot everyone in the sprawling metropolitan area now served by KUHF would be able to hear static-free programming on the new station, which would be renamed KUHC.
The 50,000-watt KTRU tower is north of Bush Intercontinental Airport, with its signal reaching about 30 miles in all directions, UH spokesman [Richard] Bonnin said.
Some people can hear it farther out, depending on the terrain and the listeners’ radio equipment.
KUHF’s 100,000-watt transmitter in Missouri City reaches 50 miles or more in all directions, Bonnin said.
The university knew about the limits to KTRU’s reach when it began negotiations for the transmitter and license, he said.
Their proposed solution to this is HD radio, which is to say pretty much what had existed before for those wanted classical or NPR 24/7. I have three questions:
1. How expensive would an upgrade to a 100Kw transmitter be? My guess is “very”, but that doesn’t mean it’s not feasible.
2. Would there be any technical reason why KTRU couldn’t be upgraded to 100Kw? Like another station nearby on the dial whose signal would be obliterated by a stronger one at 91.7, for example.
3. If the transmitter cannot be upgraded for whatever the reason, would this be grounds for the FCC to disapprove the sale?
I don’t know, so that’s why I’m asking. If you do know, please leave a comment.