Instant messaging

The MIT Technology Review has a look back at instant messaging in its regular Trailing Edge feature this month. The technology dates back to the 1980s, when MIT implemented a system that was designed to send notifications about things like server outages to workstation users. Naturally, students discovered that using the system to chat was a lot more fun.

There were other forms of IM in the mainframe world before that. I spent two summers as an intern at USAA in the life actuarial department. My second year there, 1988, my buddy David worked over in Products and Casualty. We both spent some time on the company mainframe, which had the capability of sending a message to another logged on user that would display on the screen the next time the screen changed. (Later on, in the early 90s when I started working at the large multinational firm where I am today, their VM system had the same sort of capability.) We regularly amused ourselves with this feature.

Of course, as is often the case, any piece of technology can be misused. My boss, who was fairly indulgent about my chat habit, told me a story one day about another employee. Seemed this guy had the hots for a babe who worked a few cube rows away. One day he got it in his head to use the mainframe message system to confess his feelings and ask her out on a date. (I can already hear the women in my audience cringing.) Unfortunately, when he sent the message he accidentally used the feature that sends messages to all logged on users. Oops! They chose not to fire him, which in the grand scheme of things may not have been such a blessing. Alas, my boss didn’t know if he at least got a Yes answer from his inamorata.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
This entry was posted in Technology, science, and math. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Instant messaging

  1. Gary Farber says:

    I recall sending messages back and forth on terminals during my extremely brief college days in 1976, and I’d be somewhat surprised to find people weren’t doing doing this back in at least the Sixties, as it was my impression they had been.

  2. I missed getting fired at EDS by the hair of my chinny-chin-chin for this when I was a mere operator. We were sending another version of IMs over the system consoles about Very Important System Processes breaking down and going up in flames and sparks flying and running “$$$ Dollars Lost so far” totals. One of the gurus saw it, and panicked because we made them FAR too believable. After scrambling five departments, including the data center manager, they found me and Vinnie at the consoles in the basement with shit-eating grins on our faces. The passle of gurus was NOT pleased.

    The guru I embarassed later took me under his wing, and here I am today. Vinnie is still at EDS, a huge Big Wheel, too. Safe to say we all learned a little bit that day.

  3. David says:

    After leaving USAA, I spent long hours Unix-‘talk’-ing to the woman who is now my wife. It seemed easier than actually walking the hundred yards (maybe?) to her office (in a different, but attached, building).

    Strangely, we don’t even think of using IM (or its ilk) nowadays to talk to each other during the day — cell phones and e-mail seem to fill the void.

  4. I think that’s the reason why you and I liked the USAA “chat” mechanism – there was no email, and I don’t think either of us had a phone (at least, I’m pretty sure I didn’t). I don’t think I’ve ever used any form of chat or IM since then. Email is definitely preferable for me.

Comments are closed.