We’re going to vote on making an income tax double secret illegal

It’s definitely time for sine die.

Sen. Pat Fallon

Texas voters will decide in November if they want to bar the imposition of an income tax, following approval of the constitutional amendment by the state Senate on Monday.

The Texas House had approved House Joint Resolution 38, which prohibits the imposition of an individual income tax, earlier this month.

The seemingly anodyne proposal ran into pushback Monday from some Senate Democrats who suggested the bill could cut business taxes, a major source of state money.

There appears to be no threat of an income tax currently — no such bill appears to have been filed, let alone have reached the floor of either chamber, where it would be political kryptonite. And a 1993 constitutional amendment already holds that Texas can adopt a state income tax only if voters approve and that the money would go for the “support of education.”

But Senate Democrats on Monday sparred with Republicans over a seemingly arcane bit of language that could carry big budget implications.

The resolution says that the Legislature may not impose a net income tax on “individuals.”

Democrats, pointing to an analysis by the state’s nonpartisan Legislative Budget Board, said that could be interpreted by courts to apply to businesses, especially because the measure’s language uses that term rather than “natural persons,” which is often used in statutes.

The business levy, long a target of Republicans eager to shave taxes, brings in about $8 billion per biennium, helping to fund public schools.

“The term ‘individuals’ is not defined and could be interpreted to include entities that are currently subject to the state’s franchise tax,” the Legislative Budget Board analysis reads. “To the extent the joint resolution might exempt some entities from the franchise tax, there could be a loss to state revenue.”


Earlier during the debate, [author Sen. Pat] Fallon said the constitutional amendment would firm up the state’s opposition to income tax.

“I’m always in fear of an income tax,” he said. “Every day I wake up, the thought of Texas having an income tax makes me shudder. Physically shudder, not metaphorically.”

Seriously? Mere words cannot adequately express my reaction to Sen. Fallon’s delicate sensibilities, so mark me down as being somewhere between here and here. I do hope you sleep better tonight, Senator, and if not I recommend warm milk and a bedtime story, preferably one with a happy ending. As for my reaction, here it is:

“Why would pesky LBB fiscal facts be any help when discussing a major source of state revenue for schools?” Eva DeLuna Castro, a budget analyst with the left-leaning Center for Public Policy Priorities, wrote on Twitter. “I mean, it’s not as if major business conglomerates have highly paid tax lawyers waiting in the wings to explain why they are ‘individuals’ too.”

What could possibly go wrong? The Trib and the DMN have more.

Related Posts:

This entry was posted in That's our Lege and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to We’re going to vote on making an income tax double secret illegal

  1. Doris Murdock says:

    See Citizens United.

  2. Bill_Daniels says:

    Have to disagree with you here, Kuff. Personally, I’d be just fine with a bill that states that any public official that voices support for a state income tax be immediately removed from office, tarred, feathered, and run out of the state.

    Since there is currently no bill, and seemingly, no interest in a state income tax currently, that doesn’t mean there won’t be in the future, especially as Texas turns purple. So yeah, at the moment it’s a bill in search of a problem, but I support the message, which is just as meaningful as declaring an official Texas Puppy and Kitten Day.

    It’s something every Texan should support, period. The only folks who should support a state income tax are accountants, who will make money on the misery of the people.

  3. eric dick says:

    I think this is a possible play to eliminate the franchise tax.

  4. Ross says:

    So, Bill, We can put you down as favoring very high property taxes as the best way to fund government in Texas? And, I guess you must be making 2 or 3 million dollars a year, or you wouldn’t be opposed to a state income tax.

  5. Bill_Daniels says:


    Put me down as wanting to cut and tighten the budgets of our local school districts, not just tax and spend. The reason property taxes are out of control is, local governments have a spending problem.

    Changing school names? Bloated administration? Taj Mahal quality school buildings? We don’t need all that. What would REALLY help is the federal government removing the mandate that we educate illegal alien kids. That one thing alone would allow school districts to significantly cut spending, with no other cuts necessary. Want to enroll your kid? Great! Prove you AND your kid are here legally, and have ICE on hand to deal with those who are not legal. Easy peasy.

  6. Ross says:

    The Feds can’t eliminate school for illegal aliens, as the Supreme Court ruled they have a right to the education.

    My kid’s school moved to a new building this year. It’s nice, but no palace. That’s pretty much true of all HISD schools. In the burbs, it may be different. Keep in mind that school construction is a fraction of the budget. I think HISD is 17 cents for debt out of a 1.20 rate.

  7. Manny says:

    I promised C.L. and Jules that when Bill Daniels goes on with racist and bigot tirades that I would not respond.

  8. Jules says:

    Manny we are doing good!

  9. C.L. says:

    Stay Strong !

Comments are closed.