Trustees apologize for Saavedra/Lathan mess

It’s a start.

Houston ISD trustees on Monday offered a public apology to students, parents and teachers for their behavior the past 10 months, particularly the chaotic meeting last week when a faction of the board surprised their colleagues and the audience by replacing the interim superintendent.

Trustees said they hoped the apology and pledge to work better with each other is the first step toward quelling infighting on the board, restoring the public’s trust and showing the Texas Education Agency that HISD is capable of governing itself.

“Our actions have not modeled the behavior we desire to instill in our children that we serve,” said Trustee Diana Dávila at a lectern surrounded by her eight colleagues. “We sincerely apologize to all of you.”


Trustee Jolanda Jones said the board at a special meeting Thursday morning would set an end date for its search for a permanent superintendent, consider hiring an executive coach for the school board and Lathan, and request a new governance counselor from the Texas Education Agency, which has been monitoring the board for months.

The trustees then left the boardroom, refusing to answer questions about what convinced trustees to change course, whether they had broken the law in secretly recruiting Saavedra and why the public should trust this latest pledge to do better.


Despite her contrition, questions remain about whether Dávila and four colleagues violated the Texas Open Meetings Act by approaching Saavedra about taking over as superintendent before informing the rest of the board or the public.

Saavedra, who served as HISD’s superintendent from 2005 to 2009, told the Chronicle on Sunday that he spoke separately with five trustees — including the four Latino members — in the days before the vote to appoint him.

Of the five trustees who voted for his appointment, Davila, Sergio Lira and Holly Maria Flynn Vilaseca said they met with Saavedra beforehand. The other two “yes” votes, Elizabeth Santos and Anne Sung, did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

Joe Larsen, a Houston First Amendment lawyer and expert on Texas’ open meetings and public information laws, said Saavedra’s acknowledgment that he spoke with a majority of trustees privately is evidence that they may have broken the law.

“It certainly would appear to indicate there’s some coordination between those five individuals toward a specific goal, constituting a majority,” Larsen said. “That’s precisely the sort of thing that should have been deliberated in public.”

The district attorney’s office would need to investigate any possible violation of the Open Meetings Act, Larsen said, which is a misdemeanor. A spokesman for Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg said the office does not comment on investigations that may or may not exist.

See here and here for the background. It’s good to hear the Board speak in this fashion, and to apparently recognize the lack of trust they have earned with the public, but suffice it to say that their actions will speak far louder than any words of contrition. I say this as someone who knows nearly all of them – I’ve never met Diana Davila, and I have only spoken to Sergio Lira over the phone – and who likes and respects them. For a broad range of reasons, I really really want them to work together to solve problems and make HISD the best it can be. This is a start, but there’s a very long way to go, and that’s before we consider the possibility that the Open Meetings Act was violated. One step at a time. The Press has more.

Related Posts:

This entry was posted in School days and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Trustees apologize for Saavedra/Lathan mess

  1. Jules says:

    I hope there is a thorough investigation into possible open meetings act violations

  2. Bill Daniels says:

    This is identity politics foreshadowing at its most raw and pure. Once whitey is put down and no longer a factor, the various other races will fracture their monolithic block and start going after each other….viciously. I’m truly surprised they didn’t announce they were going to seize white farms within the district, too.

    It’s not too late for the HISD board to get on the MAGA train.

    “Once you open your heart to patriotism, there’s no room for prejudice.”


  3. Bill Daniels says:


    Two thoughts. First, your attempted insult against Trump is on par with calling Obama jugears……the fallback of someone who can’t postulate an actual cogent argument. I always cringed when I heard someone on my side referring to O as jugears.

    Second, do you remember the Trump chicken? Leftists thought that was really sticking it to Trump, until Trump supporters co-opted it. We love the Trump chicken. It’s OUR meme now. Remember Pepe the Frog? Yeah, we took that one too. Pepe is ours, and I’m thinking at some point, we might just take Trump baby from y’all, too. It would be like taking candy from, well, a baby.

  4. Jules says:

    “the fallback of someone who can’t postulate an actual cogent argument”

    Next thing you know I’ll be calling porn stars I went bareback with “horseface” on twitter.

Comments are closed.