Uplift Harris 2.0

If at first you don’t succeed

Harris County will relaunch its guaranteed income initiative with added restrictions following Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit challenging the legality of the Uplift Harris program.

Though the Uplift Harris legal battle is still making its way through the courts, the clock is running out to move forward with the $20.5 million program because it’s funded by federal pandemic recovery dollars that must be allocated by the end of the year.

Around 1,900 participants were selected earlier this year to receive $500 monthly payments for 18 months, following a similar guaranteed income model that has been used around the country.

[…]

Paxton’s office has argued the program violates a state law prohibiting the gift of public funds to any individual, does not serve a public purpose and lacks sufficient controls on how the funding can be spent. The county has defended the initiative, arguing that it will alleviate poverty and the participants were selected by a common method of distributing public funds, a lottery system with eligibility requirements.

San Antonio and Austin have previously implemented similar programs without facing legal challenges from the state.

Under the new plan approved Thursday, the households that were already awaiting payment will receive pre-loaded cards that restrict spending to approved categories.

“That’s not the spirit of a guaranteed income program,” Hidalgo said. “That’s why this is Uplift Harris 2.0, not Uplift Harris. But it is a way to keep our promises to these families and we do think it will have a benefit and something that we can study.”

If the state challenges the modified program, the county plans to reallocate the funding to existing programs that support people living in poverty, Hidalgo said.

See here for the previous update. I will note that I thought of the “Uplift Harris 2.0” title before I read through the article and saw Judge Hidalgo’s comment. Great minds think alike, and also that was an obvious possibility. This addresses the lack of controls on how the money is spent – which, as noted, largely defeats the purpose of the program, which was intended in part to see how it performed versus other types of assistance – but whether that’s sufficient to overcome the earlier ruling remains to be seen. Now we wait for further input.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Dispatches from Dallas, August 16 edition

This is a weekly feature produced by my friend Ginger. Let us know what you think.

This week, in news from Dallas-Fort Worth, we have a grab bag that starts with some important news about the November election in the Metroplex, including how a familiar set of fingerprints is on some of the charter amendments. We also have the brouhaha about banning guns from the State Fair; Dallas County jail and budgeting woes; what Tarrant County Judge Tim O’Hare is up to; suburban school district news; a death at the CrossFit games in Fort Worth; more cricket in DFW; Dr Phil lays off folks from his new network; the Dallas Cowboys are worth more than $10 billion; and an Infinity Room is coming back to the Dallas Museum of Art. And more!

This week’s post was brought to you by the music of Harold Budd, the pianist, composer, and collaborator with both Brian Eno and the Cocteau Twins.

Let’s start with election news, and not the sort that involves calling anybody weird.

While everybody should be checking their voter registration on the regular, folks in North Texas are in particular danger as elections administrators in Collin, Rockwall, and Denton counties have been flooded by challenges to voter eligibility. True the Vote is the main suspect.

Meanwhile, in Tarrant County, Civera voting software is going to be used to allow residents to view images ballots online, with personal identifying information redacted. The Star-Telegram article discusses the privacy issues; I have to admit my first reaction is “there’s no way anything could go wrong with that!” But making the ballot images available is required by state law, and you know how we change that.

One of the big ballot categories in Dallas in November is going to be the much-discussed charter amendments. The Dallas Morning News has an op-ed piece by former mayors Mike Rawlings, Tom Leppert, and Ron Kirk on which amendments they oppose and why. They don’t like twelve of the fifteen proposed by the council nor any of the four petition amendments.

That last category is of real interest to me. One of the four petition amendments is about loosening marijuana enforcement. Two of other three are detailed in this KERA article about the massive budget cuts the amendments would cause. The three measures would increase Dallas PD by 1,000 officers (about a third of the number of current officers per DPD) and dictating that some new city revenue be used to fund the police department; and basing the city manager’s pay to a resident survey. The third would allow Dallas residents to sue the city to enforce the charter, ordinances, or state law.

KERA tells us who’s behind those three amendments: a group called Dallas HERO, who I’m sure are familiar with the history of that term in Houston city management. The article names several people as members: Pete Marocco, a Trump administration appointee; Stefani Carter, former Republican representative to the Texas House (HD 102) and current board member of Braemar Hotels and Resorts; and local hotelier Monty Bennett of Braemar Hotels and Resorts, whose name you will have read before in these pages.

It sure seems like Bennett and his cronies have figured out how to run the city and want to do it without the pesky necessity of “getting elected”.

In other news:

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Dispatches from Dallas, August 16 edition

Erica Lee Carter to run in the special election for CD18

She says she’s in.

Erica Lee Carter

U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s daughter Erica Lee Carter announced Monday that she is running to finish out her mother’s term in Congress.

Jackson Lee died July 19 after being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. She represented the Houston area for more than 30 years.

In a statement posted to Jackson Lee’s Instagram Monday evening, Lee Carter wrote that the people in the 18th congressional district had re-elected her mother to protect their interests and uphold their values, and that her mother had their best interest in mind until her death.

Lee Carter said that since her mother died, community leaders and Democratic activists had requested she finish her mother’s two-year term, which ends in January.

“After careful consideration, the answer is YES,” Lee Carter said in her statement.

Lee Carter called her mom the “ultimate finisher” who never took ‘no’ as a final answer.

“I cared for her until the end and if the people of the 18th Congressional district entrust me with their vote, then it is my desire to finish the 118th Session in the way that she would have, by supporting justice, equality, healthcare, human rights and economic opportunity for all,” Lee Carter wrote.

See here for some background. As discussed in the comments to this earlier post, the full-term nominee cannot run in the special election because state law (generally) forbids a candidate from appearing twice on the same ballot. I personally don’t see any value in one of the runnersup for the nomination filing for the special – this is for two months, with usually not all that much to do; the symbolic value of Lee Carter serving out the remainder of her late mother’s term outweighs the other considerations. I’ll be happy to vote for her, and I hope she wins outright so she has as much time as possible in office.

The main concern was that an election like this would draw a large field of mostly indistinguishable candidates and end up in a runoff. Lee Carter should be able to avoid that, and this development helps.

One person who has already pledged his support is Dr. James Dixon, pastor of the Community of Faith Church and head of Houston’s NAACP.

On Aug. 9, Dixon held a press conference officially announcing his intentions to seek that “interim” special election seat. However, he added a specific caveat.

“If, however, the Congresswoman’s daughter, my little sister Erica Lee Carter, decided to enter that race to fill her mother’s term, I would immediately acquiesce and put 1,000% of our support behind Erica Lee Carter,” said Dixon. “I would never find myself running against my family, friends and certainly not the daughter of the beloved, our precious one, Congresswoman Lee.”

That works. The filing deadline is August 22, which is to say next Thursday, so the potential for a surprise or two is still there. I’ll keep an eye on it.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

The great timesheet caper has been foiled

We can all sleep better at night knowing this guy is off the street.

The Texas Rangers concluded an investigation into Harris County’s highly scrutinized November 2022 election, finding no evidence that there was an attempt to sway the results, District Attorney Kim Ogg announced Tuesday.

The election, marred by a ballot paper shortage that impacted voters at some polling locations across the county, sparked state legislation and more than 20 lawsuits based partly on Republican claims that county officials had deliberately allocated an insufficient amount of ballot paper to polls in conservative areas in an effort to disenfranchise GOP voters.

“Some have said this (shortage) was directed at one party,” Ogg said Tuesday. “Our investigation has not found that to be so.”

However, a former county election employee now faces charges of theft and tampering with government documents. Ogg said investigators found that Darryl Blackburn, who oversaw supplies, was working two full-time jobs during the 2022 election, which she said led to his failure to properly allocate ballot paper — a conclusion that Democratic party leadership swiftly disputed.

“Mr. Blackburn not only stole thousands of dollars from Harris County, in the sense that he lied on time sheets,” Ogg said. “Much more importantly, he stole individuals’ right to vote, a basic constitutional right in our democracy, because people on both sides were delayed in their voting, halted in their voting, rerouted in their voting.”

[…]

Harris County Democratic Party chair Mike Doyle, who attended Ogg’s news conference, blasted the district attorney for arguing that Blackburn’s alleged crime affected the election.

“This guy may well have double dipped,” Doyle said, “but it’s just another way to repeat the lie that there was an election that somebody didn’t get to vote at, which we know after weeks of testimony and years of digging, they never came up with anybody.”

According to investigators, Blackburn held a full-time job in the oil and gas industry while also working full-time for Harris County, signing false time sheets and submitting a false application for paid parental leave. On Election Day, he claimed that he worked 18 hours with the county while also getting paid for his job in The Woodlands, clocking a total of 26 hours of work that day, investigators said.

Blackburn’s attorney, Charles Flood, called the charges against his client an “abuse of power” by a district attorney who is “cynically playing politics with people’s lives.”

“This case isn’t about the election — it’s about timesheets,” Flood said in a statement. “The Texas Rangers made clear that the evidence shows no intent or attempt to influence the 2022 election, so it seems Ms. Ogg’s only motivation is to try and claim my client as some sort of consolation prize. My client is not guilty, and we look forward to defending his innocence.”

Boy, the difference between the windup and the pitch here is substantial. The only reason this is even a crime is because he was a government employee; his other company will have at most a civil complaint if they want to pursue one. And it took a year and a half and the full might of the Texas Rangers to ferret this out. Typical of the entire “election fraud” grift. Imagine if public schools had that big a disparity between their budgets and their results. Put a bow on this, and we’ll await the likely plea deal Mr. Blackburn makes with the next DA.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, Election 2022 | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Council sends Whitmire’s anti-protest ordinance to committee

Good, but until he backs down it’s not good enough.

Mayor John Whitmire

Houston City Council tabled Mayor John Whitmire’s proposal to ban targeted protests near residential homes after fierce opposition from pro-Palestine groups, the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others over its potential impact on free speech.

The new ordinance seeks to ban picketing within 200 feet of the residence of an individual being targeted by a protest. If passed, it would also prohibit the city from issuing permits for any demonstration in front of a home.

The proposal has sparked backlash from local activists and some council members since it first appeared on the agenda two weeks ago. Many worry it appears to single out a specific group — the pro-Palestinian coalition that has been demonstrating outside the mayor’s own home for the past few months. They also noted existing tools, such as the city’s sound ordinance, already act as safeguards against overly disruptive protests.

Whitmire has vehemently defended the plan, saying the repeated demonstrations outside his residence have raised safety concerns for him and his neighbors. The mayor, however, acknowledged the proposal’s sensitive nature and gained the council’s support on Wednesday to send it to the public safety committee for further discussions.

“In my 50 years of passing legislation and voting on thousands of bills, I’ve never seen a piece of legislation that couldn’t be improved, and this certainly falls in that category,” Whitmire said Wednesday.

[…]

The proposal has also sparked outrage among other advocacy and civil rights groups, including the ACLU of Texas, the Houston branch of the NAACP, the Houston LGBTQ+ Political Caucus and Emgage Action, a nonprofit dedicated to empowering Muslim voters.

Carunya Achar, an engagement coordinator at the ACLU of Texas, said the proposed law would not only impose an unnecessary restriction on free speech but also divert the city’s attention away from more pressing local concerns.

“The ordinance is a poor use of our time and our resources in a city that should be prioritizing disaster recovery and care for all of its citizens,” Achar said. “It is inevitable that people will disagree with one another … It is our responsibility to defend free speech when we vehemently disagree with it because that is the nature of democracy and the crux of it.”

See here for the background. I would hope that over those fifty years the Mayor has also recognized that some bills, no matter what one thinks of their intentions, just don’t need to be passed. We have existing ordinances in place to handle issues with noise, trash, and blocking roads or sidewalks. Let them serve their function. The Houston Landing has more.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Council sends Whitmire’s anti-protest ordinance to committee

Texas blog roundup for the week of August 12

The Texas Progressive Alliance got some advice on changing its car’s oil from Tim Walz while putting together this week’s roundup.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of August 12

Turner wins CD18 nomination

It was very close.

Sylvester Turner

Several dozen precinct chairs Tuesday night elected former Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner to be the Democratic nominee for Congressional District 18, replacing the late Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee on the Nov. 5 ballot.

The vote means Turner is likely to be the district’s representative for at least one two-year term beginning in Jan. 2025. Turner will face Republican Lana Centonze in the Nov. 5 general election for the heavily Democratic district.

Turner narrowly defeated former At-Large City Council Member Amanda Edwards in a runoff election with 41 votes to Edwards’ 37.

Acknowledging his age of 69 and previous battle with a form of bone cancer, Turner promised to be a bridge candidate to a younger generation and said he would serve only one term.

“I don’t intend to be there forever, but this is a critical moment and it demands experience and relationships right now,” he told the precinct chairs and audience at Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church.

Edwards is 42 and had pitched herself as part of a new generation of younger leaders.

It took only two rounds of voting to select Turner from a field of seven nominees.

The final vote by just 78 precinct chairs from the congressional district ends an uncommon, but not unheard of, process to replace a political party nominee on the ballot after they had won the primary election.

[…]

At least 12 local Democrats threw their name in to the contest, including Turner, Edwards, state Rep. Christina Morales, state Rep. Jarvis Johnson and At-Large City Council Member Letitia Plummer.

​​Those five, along with Houston chef and businessman Robert Slater, were the only six candidates officially nominated during the meeting.

Slater briefly ran in this year’s Democratic primary against Jackson Lee, along with Edwards, but he dropped out before Election Day and endorsed Jackson Lee.

The candidates participated in individual interviews with a small committee of precinct chairs last week, and the precinct chairs’ top 7 candidates participated in a forum Saturday leading up to Tuesday’s meeting.

Turner was selected after two rounds of voting.

Following a roll call vote, Turner narrowly won the first round with 35 votes. Edwards finished in second with 34 votes.

Ten other precinct chairs voted for other candidates, and one precinct chair, the meeting’s secretary, abstained.

Just a minor correction, the meeting secretary was not a precinct chair and was not eligible to vote. She announced that she was abstaining at the end of the roll call vote, and then Chair Linda Bell-Robinson (who did an outstanding job leading this convention) clarified that she couldn’t vote and had been mistaken to say that she was abstaining. Wouldn’t have mattered in the end anyway.

As this vote is a matter of public record, I’ll state that I supported Amanda Edwards. I thought she had the best combination of vision and experience and I had been excited about her candidacy in this last primary. I think Mayor Turner will do a fine job – he does have the connections, I believe he will hit the ground running, and I congratulated him after the race was over. He says he will serve two terms, which would mean an open primary in 2028. I suspect he will draw a primary challenger in 2026, because someone will either be sufficiently dissatisfied with this result or strategic enough to think that they might have better odds in that scenario than a 2028 feeding frenzy. That’s all for the future, and who knows what will happen. For now, Turner is poised to be the next member of Congress from CD18. I wish him all the best. The Trib and the Chron have more.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Another complaint filed over abortion denial

Not a lawsuit but a federal complaint about improper emergency care.

Two women have filed complaints with the federal government alleging that Texas hospitals denied them abortion care necessary to treat their ectopic pregnancies.

The complaints were filed August 6 by Kelsie Norris-De La Cruz and Kyleigh Thurman against Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital and Round Rock-based Ascension Seton Williamson Hospital, respectively. Both women are represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Both say the hospitals denied them appropriate stabilizing medical care, which hospitals that accept federal Medicare funding are required to do under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, also known as EMTALA.

Ectopic pregnancies, which happen when a fertilized egg implants outside the pregnant person’s uterus, can be fatal to them and cannot result in birth. Both women had ectopic pregnancies that implanted in their fallopian tubes, which connect ovaries to the uterus.

The women say that they were initially sent home without receiving appropriate care, which in this case should have been terminating the pregnancy. The women say they continued to seek follow-up care: Norris-De LaCruz sought a second opinion hours later with a different doctor who diagnosed her ectopic pregnancy and had her brought in for surgery. Thurman returned days later after experiencing continued vaginal bleeding. But by the time both could receive abortions, their pregnancies had ruptured. Both women had to have their affected fallopian tube removed.

These are administrative complaints filed with the US Department of Health and Human Services, which if upheld could result in penalties against the hospitals. I have no idea how this sort of thing proceeds or on what timeline, so we’ll go on this journey together.

The Associated Press had a long story on these complaints, including this key bit.

In Texas, where doctors face up to 99 years of prison if convicted of performing an illegal abortion, medical and legal experts say the law is complicating decision-making around emergency pregnancy care.

Although the state law says termination of ectopic pregnancies is not considered abortion, the draconian penalties scare Texas doctors from treating those patients, the Center for Reproductive Rights argues.

“As fearful as hospitals and doctors are of running afoul of these state abortion bans, they also need to be concerned about running afoul of federal law,” said Marc Hearron, a center attorney. Hospitals face a federal investigation, hefty penalties and threats to their Medicare funding if they break the federal law.

[…]

Conclusively diagnosing an ectopic pregnancy can be difficult. Doctors cannot always find the pregnancy’s location on an ultrasound, three separate doctors consulted for this article explained. Hormone levels, bleeding, a positive pregnancy test and ultrasound of an empty uterus all indicate an ectopic pregnancy.

“You can’t be 100% — that’s the tricky part,” said Kate Arnold, an OB-GYN in Washington. “They’re literally time bombs. It’s a pregnancy growing in this thing that can only grow so much.”

Texas Right to Life Director John Seago said the state law clearly protects doctors from prosecution if they terminate ectopic pregnancies, even if a doctor “makes a mistake” in diagnosing it.

“Sending a woman back home is completely unnecessary, completely dangerous,” Seago said.

But the state law has “absolutely” made doctors afraid of treating pregnant patients, said Hannah Gordon, an emergency medicine physician who worked in a Dallas hospital until last year.

“It’s going to force doctors to start creating questionable scenarios for patients, even if it’s very dangerous,” said Gordon. She left Texas hoping to become pregnant and worried about the care she’d get there.

Gordon recalled a pregnant patient at her Dallas emergency room who had signs of an ectopic pregnancy. Because OB-GYNs said they couldn’t definitively diagnose the problem, they waited to end the pregnancy until she came back the next day.

“It left a bad taste in my mouth,” Gordon said.

Both complaints call for a complete investigation of the two hospitals, remediation of any violations of the rules, penalties as appropriate, monitoring the resulting agreements to ensure continued compliance, and whatever else may be needed. Again, I don’t know how this will play out, but I will keep an eye on it.

Couple things to keep in mind. One is the ongoing EMTALA litigation, which is very much in the atmosphere here. Technically, as noted in the first story, Texas law expressly allows for ectopic pregnancies to be terminated, so in that sense EMTALA is not in play. But the uncertainty surrounding it, both in terms of what SCOTUS will eventually say and the egregious risk that doctors and hospitals face when confronted with these situations given the harshness of Texas’ law, will surely be a big part of the defense.

Do not get caught up in the forced-birthers’ rationale that all of this is the doctors’ responsibility, because they claim the law is clear and they should just do their jobs. The law is quite deliberately broad and vague in addition to be extremely punitive, and the so-called guidance provided by the Texas Medical Board is no help. I want to see these plaintiffs win, but it’s not the doctors or the hospitals we should be mad at, even if we ultimately agree that in these instances they acted with too much caution at the plaintiffs’ expense. It’s the Lege, and Greg Abbott, and Ken Paxton, and both SCOTUS and the State Supreme Court that are ultimately at fault.

We can do something about all that this November, and again in two years. You know what we need to do. The Trib, the Chron, and the Current have more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Another complaint filed over abortion denial

Anti-endorsement watch: Houston LGBTQ+ Political Caucus, LULAC Council to oppose HISD bond

It’s officially campaign season here now.

The Houston LGBTQ+ Political Caucus and the League of United Latin American Citizens Council 60 are both urging voters to reject Houston ISD’s $4.4 billion school bond proposal in November.

In separate, recent statements, leaders of the two local civil rights organizations have urged Houston residents to vote against the largest school bond in state history in the upcoming Nov. 5 election, citing a lack of trust in the district after the Texas Education Agency replaced the elected board members and superintendent with appointees in June 2023.

[…]

Austin David Ruiz, president of the Houston LGBTQ+ Political Caucus, said the organization’s members voted nearly unanimously during their endorsement meeting Saturday to oppose the bond due to a lack of faith and trust in Miles and the unelected school board. He said only one person in the caucus voted against the motion to oppose the bond.

“Our members’ concerns echo that of parents, teachers, and community advocates, and reiterates the overwhelming opposition to the ongoing state takeover,” Ruiz said in a statement. “Our children and teachers deserve better than the havoc they have endured under Miles’ leadership. No trust. No bond.”

LULAC Council president Rachel Cevallos de Gonzales said while the organization recognizes the need for infrastructure improvements in HISD schools, it strongly opposes the current bond measure. She said HISD leaders have “failed to demonstrate accountability and transparency” and eroded “confidence in the decision-making processes that impact our children’s future.”

“We urge our fellow community members, parents and educators to join us in opposing the upcoming bond election,” Cevallos de Gonzales wrote in a letter to state Rep. Christina Morales Thursday. “Let us send a clear message that we demand accountability, transparency and a genuine partnership between HISD and the communities it serves.”

See here for some background. As the story notes, some other organizations such as the Houston chapter of the NAACP have come to the same position, though there is organized support for the bond as well. You know where I stand, and you know I will not criticize anyone who opposes it. At this point, I am mostly interested to see who puts up the money and organizes the campaigns for the pro- and anti-bond camps. I’ll also be very interested in the 30 day campaign finance reports for each. Money speaks louder than words.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Anti-endorsement watch: Houston LGBTQ+ Political Caucus, LULAC Council to oppose HISD bond

A checklist for CenterPoint

I’ve said on multiple occasions as various officeholders have (correctly and justifiably) dumped on CenterPoint that they owe us a list of actual things they intend to do about them. This op-ed by Sandra Haverleh of the Texas Consumer Association is what I’m talking about.

No longer seen at I-10 and Sawyer

I hope the city and state will identify many potential actions from their investigations. But here is the minimum that we Texans should demand:

  • First, CenterPoint must recognize that customers are not ATMs. CenterPoint stock is up nearly 23% since Winter Storm Uri caused the last big outage. In the opinion of many lawmakers, that increase is due to the company’s relentless focus on investors and not customers. The utility can start by emphasizing the swift delivery of information. Tools such as the outage map and restoration map need to be working and accurate.
  • CenterPoint must also be transparent and truthful. The company promised that the $800 million it charged customers for massive grid-scale emergency generators large enough to power multiple neighborhoods would help minimize outage impacts. However, on July 11, CenterPoint executives told the PUC that most of those generators aren’t effective in storms such as hurricanes. The generators CenterPoint purchased and that customers are paying for, the CEO recently told lawmakers, are most effective during rolling blackouts, not when lines are lying on the ground.
  • The PUC must hold CenterPoint accountable for its failures, starting with forcing the company to move forward with the rate case filed in March. Experts with coalitions of cities served by CenterPoint and other intervenors submitted evidence the company is overcharging customers by about $100 million per year. If the PUC stops the rate case, the overcharging will continue. Additionally, the commission should require CenterPoint to demonstrate that customer payments go toward improving reliability and safety.
  • CenterPoint has requested and received multiple rate increases, including two in less than a year. The process to request and approve rate increases is hurried and unclear for ratepayers, the public and even those who work for the regulatory agencies. Reform for this process should start within the PUC.
  • The Texas Legislature can’t ignore the big-picture concerns with allowing utilities to increase their rates. State lawmakers can start by repealing SB 1015, written by state Sen. Phil King (R-Weatherford) and strongly supported by CenterPoint. That bill not only made it easier for utilities to increase their rates twice per year, it eliminated any in-depth review by the PUC. At the very least, CenterPoint should have to prove the rate increases are being invested wisely.
  • The Legislature should also reform the rate recovery process for electricity-distribution such as CenterPoint. The Legislature granted each of them a monopoly, a generous gift that guarantees them a profit and forces customers to pay them. The timelines for rate cases are too short, the process is antiquated and opaque, and there are no real avenues for public input.
  • Lawmakers should also set minimum standards for equipment weatherization and communication that CenterPoint and other electric delivery companies adhere to.

Houstonians must keep consistent pressure on local, state and federal elected officials. Tell them what you expect from your ratepayer dollars. Infrastructure must be built to higher standards, with capable managers and multiple avenues of communication that function at a high level and are easy to understand.

CenterPoint made $6.7 billion in gross profit just last year. The customers have paid more than necessary and deserve reliable infrastructure in return.

That may not be everything you might want, but it’s a fine starting point. Talk to your legislators and your candidates for the Lege and ask them if they will repeal SB1015. Remember that Greg Abbott appoints every member of the PUC. Don’t let this go down the memory hole like too much of Winter Storm Uri appears to have done. We get a chance to do something about this every other November.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Accountability ratings release halted

Welp.

A Travis County judge has blocked the Texas Education Agency from releasing its ratings of the state’s school districts and campuses for a second year in a row.

Judge Karin Crump on Monday issued a temporary restraining order after Texas school districts filed their second lawsuit over changes to the metrics that are used to measure their performance.

[…]

The lawsuit filed Monday is the second legal battle over the A-F rating system.

Last fall, a Travis County judge temporarily blocked the release of the 2023-24 ratings. The judge sided with more than 120 school districts who had filed a lawsuit contending the stricter standards would bring unfair drops to their ratings. The judge still has to make a final ruling but has said she will likely side with school districts. The TEA has already said it plans to appeal the judge’s decision.

Families have had five years without a complete set of school ratings. Texas schools and districts did not get ratings in 2020 or 2021 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. And in 2022, struggling schools set to get a D or an F got extra relief: Senate Bill 1365 directed TEA to forgo official ratings for those schools to give them time to respond to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Chron adds some details.

“The Commissioner radically changed the way the new STAAR test is being administered by replacing human graders with AI grading. This change was made without ensuring that this radical change would not impact the new STAAR test’s validity and reliability,” said the lawsuit, which was filed on Monday. “In fact, it appears that AI grading has resulted in a test that is not ‘valid and reliable’ and cannot lawfully be used to assign A–F ratings for school districts and campuses.”

Test results this year showed a sharp uptick in the number of zeroes scored on essay questions, prompting some critics to question whether the increase was due to the computer scoring. TEA has said the shift is unrelated to the new grading system and attributed the change to new scoring rubric and a higher test difficulty.

The lawsuit is the latest brought by Nick Maddox, the same attorney who helped about 100 districts block last year’s A-F ratings. The plaintiffs in the latest lawsuit are a group of independent school districts, including Pecos-Barstow-Toyah, Crandall, Forney, Fort Stockton and Kingsville.

“We believe that our arguments are valid. They obviously made sense to the judge and our sense of urgency because once you let the cat out of the bag and release those scores, it’s too late,” Maddox said.

A spokesman for TEA said in an emailed statement that the agency is “reviewing the finding and will evaluate appropriate next steps.”

“The A-F accountability system is good for kids. It is why the legislature adopted a strong A-F framework to help improve the quality of student learning across the state, give parents a clear understanding of how well their schools are performing and establish clear expectations for school leaders so they can better serve students,” the statement said. “It is disappointing that a small group of school boards and superintendents opposed to fair accountability and transparency have once again filed a lawsuit aimed at preventing A-F ratings from being issued and keeping families in the dark about how their schools are doing.”

Last year, the districts argued that the TEA had unfairly increased standards in such a way that would depress school ratings, and a judge agreed to block the 2023 A-F scores.

The TEA’s more rigorous formula raised the threshold for high schools to earn an “A” in college readiness, which is determined by the percentage of students who score well on Advanced Placement exams, obtain certain industry certifications or enlist in the military. Schools that previously earned the minimum college readiness score for an A in 2022 would receive a D in 2024.

I assume all this will step on Mike Miles’s messaging a bit. I assume at some point this litigation will be resolved, and it will probably not be great for a non-trivial number of districts once that happens. That’s all too far out for me to think about at this time. If you’re wondering where the full ratings listing is, now you know.

Posted in Legal matters, School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Nasal vaccine for flu and COVID in the works

Pretty cool.

A team of researchers from the University of Houston have developed a new vaccine to treat and prevent the spread of flu and multiple coronavirus strains.

Through two nasal sprays — an immune activating therapeutic treatment and a new vaccine — the team of UH researchers have not only broken ground on vaccinating against SARS-CoV-2 and the flu virus, but also on creating a universal coronavirus vaccine.

Dr. Navin Varadarajan, who leads the lab behind the nasal sprays, said the new vaccine will be a game-changer to the “major obstacle” of current vaccines, which can prevent people from serious illness, but not stop them from spreading the disease to others.

“They can (current vaccines) keep you out of the hospital, but it doesn’t stop you from spreading it to vulnerable people,” Varadarajan said.

On top of providing a way to stop the spread of COVID to those most at risk — the elderly and immunocompromised — the new nasal vaccine is a crucial step forward in the goal of fighting viral evolution.

It’s natural for viruses to change and evolve — and SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is no exception. As viruses spread farther and faster, they can better adapt to their environment. Successful variants beat out weaker ones, which can lead to easier transmission or worsened disease.

While many viral variants have minimal impact, over time viruses become stronger against existing vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 resides in the nose, and since existing vaccines are intramuscular, meaning they are administered through a shot in the arm, the virus is not actually eliminated from the body.

NanoSTING-SN, on the other hand, hits “the last mile” of the nose, which prevents the disease from spreading, Varadarajan said. It’s also a pan-coronavirus nasal vaccine, meaning it works against the infection and disease of all viruses in the coronavirus family.

In animals, the nasal vaccine was 100% effective in stopping transmission of the Omnicron variants of concern to unvaccinated hosts.

[…]

Before starting the process of approving the nasal vaccine with the FDA, Varadarajan’s startup, AuraVax Therapeutics, is prioritizing the researchers’ second nasal spray, NanoSTING. The spray is a therapeutic treatment for influenza strains more resilient to viral evolution than existing treatments. Through an immune-boosting ingredient called cGAMP, the formula puts cells in an intensified state of alert to fend off respiratory viruses.

Prescription treatment for viruses like the flu often run into the obstacle of resistant or sensitive strains of influenza. UH researchers say NanoSTING has the potential to be a broad-spectrum therapy, as it can override these resistant strains, unlike drugs such as Tamiflu.

Like I said, pretty cool, and happening here in Houston. You can read more about it on this UH press release, and you can learn more about AuraVax here. It sounds to me like this is still a couple of years away from being approved, but maybe I’m overestimating that. In any event, it’s good to see this in the pipeline.

Posted in Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The CD18 candidate forum

This was a well-organized event, and my kudos to everyone who put it together in such a short period of time. I just have a couple of comments.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee

Candidates vying to fill the congressional seat of the late U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee made one final appeal as to why they are the most qualified to fill her shoes during a Saturday forum at the Young Women’s College Preparatory Academy.

Jackson Lee died July 19 following a battle with pancreatic cancer. She represented the Houston area for more than 30 years.

The district’s 88 precinct chairs have been placed in charge of selecting the party’s nominee for the race since there is no time for a primary. They have been conducting interviews with candidates throughout the week and will convene at 6 p.m. Tuesday at Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church’s Community Life Center to select their nominee.

Gov. Greg Abbott has also called for a special election to fill the remainder of Jackson Lee’s term, which ends in January. Candidates with eyes on that race will have until Aug. 22 to sign up.

Ahead of that selection, seven of the race’s contenders — including former Mayor Sylvester Turner, state Rep. Jarvis Johnson and former Houston City Council Member Amanda Edwards — spoke about a wide array of topics, from the Houston ISD takeover and the cancelation of Metro’s University Line to overcrowding and understaffing at the Harris County Jail and job creation in the district.

The seven candidates who appeared onstage Saturday were the top picks surveyed by precinct chairs for the nomination, the event’s hosts said.

The story goes on to list some top takeaways, and you can read that and the other coverage, which I will link at the end, for more. Of the seven candidates that were on stage, I’ve done interviews with four of them (Amanda Edwards, Rep. Jarvis Johnson, Rep. Christina Morales, and former Mayor Sylvester Turner), while the other three were new to me. Everyone presented themselves well, and even the ones I have ranked at the bottom of my personal preference list made some good points.

My main complaint is that some of the questions were not really useful. Too many were on local issues: the state takeover of HISD, how CenterPoint conducts its business, the issues at the Harris County jail. The latter was used as a springboard for broader criminal justice reform and mental health matters, which were useful and illuminating, but the point is that the question isn’t really about what Congress can do. A question about immigration policy, or about court reform (candidate Cortland Wickliff repeatedly harped on SCOTUS and the need to reform it, mostly echoing the recent Biden proposals, and while that was good and easily his best moments, I’d have greatly preferred it to be a question for all and to go beyond just SCOTUS), or about voting rights (again brought up by some candidates as a priority for them and a means to achieve some of the other items asked about), or about tax policy would have been better.

The question about term limits was bizarre, in part because we’ve all spent the last month lauding Rep. Jackson Lee for all the things she was able to accomplish in her 30 years in office, including her most recent efforts on making Juneteenth a national holiday. Like, would any of us feel that we’d have been better off if she’d been arbitrarily forced out of office after four terms or something like that? The voters kept returning her to office because they wanted her there and they approved of her performance. I don’t believe in taking that choice away from them. The one candidate who answered that question in a way I approved of was Mayor Turner. To be fair, the younger candidates in particular bemoaned the lack of opportunity for people like them to get taken seriously as candidates, and connected this with the perennial efforts to engage younger voters. Making the question about that instead of a referendum on term limits would have been far better.

Even with the question choices, the candidates had some good things to say. This was aired last night on Fox 26, and you can see the video here. The election itself is tomorrow at 6 PM, and I’ll report on that afterwards. The Trib, Houston Landing, and the Press have more.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

News flash: Ted Cruz is extremely anti-abortion

Let’s cut to the chase here, shall we?

I hear Cancun is nice

Texas Democrats are making abortion rights a major campaign issue after Republicans in the state banned the procedure, and U.S. Rep. Colin Allred is casting Ted Cruz’s views as “extreme” in his bid to oust the senator.

Democrats haven’t won a statewide race in three decades, but abortion could be a weak spot for Cruz. Public polling shows a majority of Texas voters oppose an outright ban. Cruz, who is staunchly anti-abortion, has expressed support for Texas’ law that only has an exception in cases where the patient’s life is at risk.

Cruz doesn’t have a say in state laws, but members of both parties in Congress have at times floated national abortion legislation both before and after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. Allred said that, if elected, he would “fight for Texas women to get their freedom back.” He has supported efforts to codify abortion protections at the federeal level.

Cruz has largely avoided talking about abortion rights during this campaign. He declined multiple requests to answer questions about his stances on the procedure or how he would approach the issue if he wins another six-year term in the Senate.

Hearst Newspapers asked Cruz for an interview about abortion in July, which the senator turned down through a spokesperson. He also declined to answer eight written questions on the subject, including whether he would support a federal abortion ban and whether the federal government offers enough resources for low-income pregnant patients.

He also declined to say whether the state or federal government should clarify the emergency medical exception to Texas’ abortion ban. Dozens of women across Texas have reported that the abortion ban has prevented them from receiving necessary medical care, even when their life was at risk and the pregnancy was unviable, because doctors feared legal repercussions.

Cruz has, however, addressed some abortion questions in other public forums. After the Supreme Court threw out federal abortion protections in 2022, Cruz said the ruling was “nothing short of a massive victory for life.”

He’s avoided answering those questions because he knows his answers suck. We can get dragged into a debate about definitions and vibes and what counts as a “ban”, but all you really need to know is that the most radical forced-birth lobby groups out there think he’s an A+ Senator. If you want to restore and protect abortion rights and access in Texas and elsewhere, vote for Colin Allred. If you want the rest of the country to have Texas’ abortion laws, Ted’s your guy. It’s as simple as that.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on News flash: Ted Cruz is extremely anti-abortion

On burying a freeway and building a park over it

Noting this for the record.

Klyde Warren Park in Dallas (Nathan Bernier/KUT News)

As a high-stakes project to sink I-35 through downtown Austin kicks into gear this summer, city officials and the University of Texas are looking to Dallas for a possible glimpse of the future.

The vision: a vast, green expanse covering sections of I-35, similar to Klyde Warren Park in Dallas. The 5.4-acre sanctuary spans the sunken Woodall Rodgers Freeway, connecting the densely populated Uptown neighborhood with a thriving Arts District and downtown business center.

Since it opened in 2012, this “deck park” has been widely hailed as a success, boosting land values and stimulating the development of luxury high-rise buildings with homes and offices that are among the most coveted in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

But the project also raises important questions about how Austin and UT should navigate the governance of their potential new parks, balancing public accessibility with privatization and commercialization.

“When we started this, TxDOT was like, ‘What are you talking about? That’s insane,” reminisced John Zogg, a Dallas real estate professional who helped launch the deck park project in 2002. “It started with that flimsy of an idea and somehow it got legs and just kind of took off.”

You can read the rest, about the history of that flimsy idea and the fight to do something similar in Austin. I just wanted to point out that there’s a similar idea for Houston and the godforsaken I-45 project, though our version of it involves turning the to-be-abandoned Pierce Elevated into a park. It sadly would still leave a to-be-vastly-increased amount of overhead traffic, just relocated to the east of downtown. There was a proposal for an I-45 tunnel to be built from the Beltway through downtown, with the aboveground space converted into a more scenic local roadway; it was later dubbed the I-45 Parkway, as the upper portion was styled in a similar fashion as Allen Parkway. I last thought about that in 2015, in a post that mentioned that the I-45 project, which had been dormant for some time, was “estimated in current dollars at $1.1 billion, isn’t expected to start construction until 2025”. I find that both absolutely hilarious in terms of its cost estimate and more than a little scary in terms of its timeline accuracy.

Anyway. My point is that what Dallas has and what Austin is fighting for we could have had, if we have to have this accursed thing at all. We gave our best shot to defeating the project, which was noble and successful for a long time, and accomplished a lot of good along the way. Maybe I-10 can get what I-45 didn’t, if we have to have that damned thing, too.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Weekend link dump for August 11

“That said, although dismissing an idea as weird might be an effective political strategy, journalists have different standards and are committed to the spirit of free inquiry. Let’s take this seriously for a second and ask: Did expanding the franchise by passing the 19th Amendment in 1920 deliver a permanent blow to U.S. economic growth and productivity? Did women crush the American dream like they’ve crushed so many dreams of having “a night out”? Would we (Americans) already be living in a future world of flying cars and thousand-year life spans if we (men/job creators) weren’t always getting nagged to take out the trash?” (Spoiler alert: No.)

Don’t reward the racist for being a racist.”

“The Man Behind Project 2025’s Most Radical Plans”.

“Chuck Schumer’s ambitious plan to take the Supreme Court down a peg”.

“Elective plasmapheresis for healthy people represents yet another manifestation of the myth of detoxing. Private clinics with varying degrees of oversight offer it, attracting rich medical tourists – even healthy ones.”

“Rudy Giuliani’s bankruptcy case was officially dismissed after his lawyers agreed to end the case”. Good.

“The Harris campaign on Sunday unveiled more than two dozen endorsements from Republicans, including former governors, members of Congress and Trump administration officials.”

“Overall, California is indeed a high-tax-high-service state, but the big difference is that Texas and Florida tax grocery store clerks and janitors way more than they tax millionaires. California taxes them less.”

Honestly, if you’ve never watched The Leftovers, you should. That article will be very spoilery if you haven’t watched it and now want to, so watch first and click later.

RIP, Charles Cyphers, actor best known for the Halloween movies.

“This Olympics Moment Shows Where Anti-Trans Calls to “Protect Women” Have Brought Us”.

“Tim Walz Has a Stellar Record on Voting Rights”.

“Peggy Flanagan could become the first Native American woman governor if Tim Walz steps down”.

“Walz Is A Big And Vocal Supporter Of Access To IVF, Contrasting Vance”.

“But here we’re talking about politics. And in the realm of politics, decency can seem extraordinary. I’m not talking about “civility” or mere politeness, but rather about what it can mean when basic decency and kindness are allowed to guide policy.”

“So, no: The Internet is not real. But the messaging is, and the journalists who spend all day on it pick up on that messaging. It’s millions and millions and millions of dollars in free publicity and good vibes. And that’s exactly what Tim Walz brings to the ticket.”

“Walz, with his cheerful goober dad persona, offers a view of masculinity that is far tougher than that displayed by even the most steroid-inflated men of the MAGA world.”

I don’t know who else needs to hear it, but please make this happen. Thanks. (Update: Alas.)

Here’s that New Yorker story about RFK Jr, which I didn’t make my way through but which contains the “dead bear cub in Central Park” tale.

RIP, Billy Bean, MLB’s Senior Vice President of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, second openly gay former player.

RIP, Patti Yasutake, actor best known for Beef and Star Trek: The Next Generation.

“Hollywood Totally Lied to Us About AI: Why Cinematic Cyborgs Are So Much Smarter Than What We Have in the Real World”.

“There’s a recognizable press cycle around inflammatory Netflix specials: right-wingers flock to see their favorite mouthpieces pop off while angry progressives meet the moment online. Being funnier than the ignorant asshole on your phone or TV can feel like a big win for human decency in the moment — but when does pushing back against something slide into giving it free publicity? In the age of ye olde algorithms, it might be sooner than you think.”

RIP, Lisa Westcott, British makeup artist who won an Oscar for Les Misérables.

RIP, Mitzi McCall, actor, comedian, game show panelist. Mark Evanier shares a remembrance.

RIP, Chi Chi Rodriguez, legendary golfer, eight-time PGA tour champ, subject of a classic joke on WKRP in Cincinnati.

RIP, Mike DeGuerin, renowned local defense attorney, brother of fellow renowned local defense attorney Dick DeGuerin, who helped to exonerate Clarence Brandley.

RIP, Cartoon Network’s website.

“Tim Walz’s military record is beyond reproach“.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 2 Comments

RFK Jr qualifies for the ballot

Whoopie.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent presidential candidate, will be on the Texas general election ballot this November.

The Texas Secretary of State’s office announced Thursday afternoon that it had accepted Kennedy’s petition to appear on the state ballot with 122,513 valid signatures. The Texas election code required a petition to have at least 113,151 valid signatures.

State Democrats said that Kennedy’s campaign didn’t have enough valid signatures and that his “attempt to overwhelm the system with bad signatures is just another example of his campaign’s disregard for the rules.”

Questions have been raised in other states about Kennedy signature gatherers and the use of misleading tactics while collecting signatures. This push from state Democrats to keep Kennedy off the ballot also aligned with national Democrats’ efforts to keep the Independent candidate off state ballots as his campaign continues to try to get ballot access in all 50 states.

Per the Chron, this may not quite be finalized just yet.

Last month, the Texas Democratic Party indicated it may sue to keep Kennedy’s name off the state ballot, alleging that most of the campaign’s signatures were invalid.

The party’s lawyer, Chad Dunn, wrote in a letter to the Secretary of States’ office on July 18 that he and his client John Mott, the Texas Democratic Party’s voter protection director, checked the signatures, which they obtained via a public records request.

They matched the names up against voter registration data and found that of the first 245,000 signatures, almost 70% were invalid, but they did not explain why.

Dunn asked the office to “kindly let us know of your decision on the certification of this application as soon as possible and with sufficient time for any aggrieved party to seek appropriate court review.” He could not be immediately reached for comment on whether the party intends to sue.

Lots of maybes in there, so we’ll just have to wait and see. I would bet on him remaining on the ballot if it came to it, and the time to file a lawsuit before the deadline for finalizing the ballot is rapidly running out.

Is RFKJr likely to have an effect on the outcome in the state? On the one hand:

Kennedy’s ballot appearance has faced challenges from Democratic officials in multiple states, arguing his campaign used misleading tactics while collecting signatures. According to the Dallas Morning News, Texas Democrats, who haven’t won a statewide election in over 30 years, view Kennedy’s independent bid as a potential threat to their chances of breaking that streak.

However, now that President Joe Biden decided to withdraw from the race, Kennedy has had a strange effect in the polls: he is taking more votes from Trump than from Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to the Washington Post, polls with third-party candidates and Kennedy result in Harris [gaining on] Trump. A poll conducted by the Marquette University Law school had Harris leading Trump by six points (53 percent to 47 percent) in a head-to-head matchup; in a race including Kennedy and third-party candidates, Harris led Trump by eight points (50 to 42).

It’s clear that Kamala Harris has fired up the Democratic base, which should help reduce defections to gremlins like RFKJr. I think it’s way too soon to say whether the total effect benefits one candidate or the other. Or, as Mark Jones would have you believe in the Chron story, that it might benefit a downballot candidate like Colin Allred. I’ll need to see a lot more polling evidence before I draw any inferences.

And on the other hand.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s independent presidential campaign is disappearing — both on the trail and in the polls.

The last public event put on by Kennedy was in Freeport, Maine, on July 9. Kennedy has since spoken virtually and appeared at a cryptocurrency conference and events put on by others, but he hasn’t been stumping on the campaign trail. (He did speak in person with reporters the day President Joe Biden dropped out of the race.) And it’s been months since his running mate, Nicole Shanahan, has had a public event on the campaign trail.

Kennedy’s public poll numbers are dropping, from around 9% or 10% in national surveys before Biden dropped out, to about half that level now. His last financial report showed the campaign carrying debt equal to more than half of the $5.6 million it had in the bank. On a media call last week, Kennedy said Democrats and Republicans colluded to make it “insurmountable” for an independent to get on the ballot in all 50 states — which he and his campaign had previously talked about as a matter of when, not if.

Maybe the guy’s just a low-energy grifter who will slowly fade from the public view as the brain worm and bear carcass stories run their course. I haven’t decided yet whether the over/under line for him in Texas is two points or three, but for sure I’d bet the under on five points.

Posted in Election 2024, The making of the President | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Going younger at HPD

Not sure about this.

Mayor John Whitmire

Mayor John Whitmire wants to tap into a younger audience for police recruits, but doing so may require going to Austin and changing state law.

During a news conference introducing new Police Chief Noe Diaz, the mayor said he is in talks with lawmakers to try to see what he could do to get younger cadets for HPD as a means of addressing its officer shortage, but the trouble with that was that the current law on the books doesn’t allow those younger than 21 to carry a weapon. He said he wanted to explore ways to introduce younger candidates with proper safeguards, training and background checks.

“Let’s grab them while they’re fired up, give them a mentor and get an HPD career started younger,” the mayor said Friday, adding that the city could seek to gain officers from the local community colleges too.

In a text to the Chronicle, Whitmire clarified he wanted to lower the age to carry under “special circumstances,” particularly as a recruiting and training tool for those who want to be HPD officers before they turn 21. He said the law, if changed, would strictly apply only to police officer cadets in order to be trained as HPD officers.

“I want to bring as many qualified people to HPD as possible, and we are going to have to review policy and laws to get that done,” Whitmire said Monday. “Then I think it’s going to be done responsibly.”

Diaz stressed the need to bring people into the department who are already vested in the community.

“We need them,” Diaz said Friday. “This is our home, and who better to fill the ranks than the young people that we have in our community?”

[…]

Greg Fremin, a retired HPD captain, was one of three 19-year-olds in his 1984 HPD class and said at the time, he couldn’t buy bullets.

Granted, Fremin already had two years in the Marine Corps under his belt and an understanding of weaponry when he was going through the academy.

If he were involved in the decision-making process, Fremin would not lower the legal age to below 19.

“I would say that as long as these young men and women that are applying are mature and they have great life experiences, let them do it,” Fremin said, adding that HPD needed to be very careful with its vetting and screening processes if the law were to change.

But if a background check fails and a younger person who shouldn’t have a weapon is armed, Fremin said “it could be a worst-case scenario.”

Fremin, who used to be captain over HPD’s police academy, stood by the department’s vetting process and said they used to go through hundreds of applicants before getting to the 70 to fill a cadet class. Those vetting processes don’t always prevent slipups, though, even after doing everything you could.

There’s risk with hiring younger officers with maturity, but that maturity will also depend on the person, Fremin said.

“You’ve got young men and women that are still maturing their thought processes, their critical decision-making skills, their rationale, you know their ability to communicate effectively,” Fremin said. “I mean, all these things you get better with in time from a maturity standpoint.”

State law already allows for the younger police recruits. HPD’s own rules limit recruits to being at least 20.5 years old; Mayor Whitmire says that would need to wait for the law about carrying guns to be changed before it would be revised. I don’t object to the narrowly-tailored law change, especially given that the restriction on under-21-year-olds having handguns was halted by a federal court and is not currently being enforced by DPS. I do share the concerns expressed by former Captain Fremin. We know that people’s brains are still maturing at that age, and police officers are asked to make a lot of judgment calls as part of their job, with potentially deadly consequences. I would suggest that HPD look at other avenues for recruitment before pursuing this one.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The NFL will use facial recognition for its ticketing at all stadia

The future is here, like it or not.

It’s just a month away from the Cowboys’ season kickoff, and fans better stay on their best behavior once the stadium doors reopen. This year, the Cowboys and the rest of the NFL will use facial recognition software to identify each fan who enters a stadium for a game.

The league took a test drive with facial authentication technology last year through the use of “Express Entry” at several NFL stadiums. The system, launched by Verizon and software startup Wicket, allowed fans to pre-enroll their facial scans into a database that allows them to enter stadiums in conjunction with walkthrough security scanners at a walking pace.

The trial run seems to have scored big, as Wicket COO Jeff Boehm announced the program’s league-wide expansion for the 2024 season. In a LinkedIn post, Boehm said Wicket’s facial authentication software will “streamline and secure the credentialing program” and “ensure that properly credentialed media, officials, staff and guests can easily and safely access restricted areas, including the playing field, press box or locker rooms.”

The selfie-based biometrics system runs alongside Accredit Solutions’ accreditation software, which checks credentials at security checkpoints throughout the stadiums. Those who have registered credential badges can have a real-time selfie compared to a user-submitted photo that is already in the system’s files at a checkpoint.

[…]

One of the main purposes for the system is to provide accountability, according to a Sports Business Journal interview with Billy Langenstein, senior director of security services for the NFL.

“[The league and the teams] know every single person who is being credentialed to work an NFL game, who they are and the access levels they should have to do their job,” Langenstein said to SBJ. “And a big part of it is accountability for those individuals, embracing it, learning it and evaluating the safety and security of the program.”

Major League Baseball has been using similar technology this season, and a note at the bottom of this article says that Wicket “tested facial recognition for ticketing at this year’s Australian Open”. In other words, expect this to spread out to the rest of the sports world. I guess it makes sense, it’s just a little dizzying to me.

Posted in Other sports, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The NFL will use facial recognition for its ticketing at all stadia

Two more small updates on CD18

I learned two things of interest from this Houston Landing story about the CD18 situation. The bulk of the story is about the candidate forum today and the recent Zoom interviews that candidates did (see here for more on each), but there were two news items of interest. First:

Former Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner, state Rep. Jarvis Johnson, state Rep. Christina Morales, At-Large City Council Member Letitia Plummer, Harris County Department of Education board member Erica Davis and former City Council Member Amanda Edwards are among at least 10 people who have announced their interest in being selected for the nomination.

The same Erica Davis who made that weirdly unfocused primary challenge to Judge Lina Hidalgo in 2022? That this is the first I’ve heard of her interest in this race, four days out from when I will be one of a very small number of people voting in it, says a lot. I’ll just leave it at that.

Second:

In a late Thursday statement, Erica Lee Carter announced she was “strongly considering” running to fill the remaining weeks of her mother’s congressional term. She said she would announce her decision next week.

The filing deadline is Aug. 22, after the Democratic nominee will be chosen by the precinct chairs.

I got a text about that announcement early on Friday. When I talked about the possibility of a runoff in this special election, I said that a candidate with a sufficient level of name recognition could still win it outright. I didn’t have anyone specific in mind for that, but Erica Lee Carter would certainly fill the bill. Good for her if she decides to do this.

Finally, on a tangential note, I thought I’d address this letter to the editor about the nomination replacement process.

Regarding “Jackson Lee’s children endorse former Mayor Turner in crowded battle to succeed her in Congress” (Aug. 5): The person who will replace the late Sheila Jackson Lee on the ballot will be selected by the Harris County Democratic Party precinct chairs. That is not fair to the people of the 18th Congressional District.

The politicians and other political leaders here are trying to be kingmakers in Harris County and in this race. They carry a lot of weight and money. When are politicians are going to allow young people to take over the politics?

Sylvester Turner is 70 years old. He has been recovering from cancer and is not in the best of health. Congresswoman Lee just passed away from cancer. Why should we maybe have to go through this twice? Why can’t Turner use his expertise to mentor young people?

I worked as a poll worker back in the mid-1970s and early ’80s. I am 70 years old, and I know how politicians have worked on precinct chairs to persuade voters who to vote for. I know some precinct chairs who have been involved with the process for more than 50 years. Some have accepted tickets to events for years, as well as other benefits.

To be clear, the majority of precinct chairs are honest. But many have been doing it for so long that they are well known by both the community and politicians. I do not believe, in this situation, this is not the best way for this position to be resolved. The law needs to be changed. The people of the 18th Congressional District should have a voice and a vote.

Well, I’ve been a precinct chair since 2008 and I have no idea what this person is talking about. Be that as it may, while it would be nice to have a more inclusive process to replace Rep. Jackson Lee as the Democratic nominee on the ballot, let’s keep the timing in mind here. She died on July 19, which is about five weeks out from the deadline date for ballots to be finalized, thanks in part to a federal law that makes it easier for military and overseas voters get mail ballots in a timely fashion. That’s five weeks in which to run not only a general (primary) election campaign, but also almost certainly a runoff, with time for early and mail voting, canvassing results, curing provisional ballots, and possible recount requests. To put it bluntly, ain’t no way that could happen.

(Yes, yes, I hear you cry “But we could have instant runoff voting to shorten the process!” That would also require the law to be changed. Good luck with that. And five weeks would still be too little time for just the one election.)

It’s true that Rep. Jackson Lee’s case was an outlier as far as the timeline goes. El Franco Lee passed away on January 3, 2016, past the deadline for filing in that year’s primary but in plenty of time to hold the kind of election this letter writer would have liked. But that would either require disallowing candidates already on that year’s ballot, like the eventual winner of that year’s process, then-Senator and now-Commissioner Rodney Ellis, or having to have at least one (and in that case two) more such elections, with decreasing amounts of time for each. Maybe that would have been doable, I don’t know. I doubt we’d have gotten a different result. Limiting the candidates who could run in the name of minimizing the electoral chaos would also be undemocratic.

One could argue that if Sylvester Turner wins on Tuesday, whatever one thinks of his candidacy, the fact that he promises to serve only two terms means we’d get an open primary election in 2028, which certainly fulfills any reasonable democratic yearning. (He, or anyone else who wins on Tuesday, could also be challenged in the 2026 primary.) Not the letter writer’s unrealistic ideal, but it’s something. The current process has its flaws, but I prefer it to leaving the seat vacant until January and then having special election, which would mean no representation at all for the district for something like eight months. Between the precinct chairs and the special election, especially if Erica Lee Carter clears the decks as I suspect she will, we’ll only be without for about three and a half months. And that could have been less if Greg Abbott had done the honorable thing and set the special for September. You want to be mad about something, aim it at him.

Anyway. I will wrap up by quoting myself, from my report on the precinct chair convention that elected Rodney Ellis as the Democratic nominee for Commissioners Court in Precinct 1 back in 2016:

It was an honor to take part in this process, but in all sincerity I hope I never have that kind of power again. It’t not something I’m comfortable with. I’m glad there are people for whom it is a better fit who can and do take on that challenge with wisdom and humility.

Yeah, that. May we not have to do this again any time soon.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Harris County Flood Control District tax hike proposal on the ballot

One more item to vote on.

Harris County will ask voters in November to increase the Flood Control District’s property tax rate to fund a “transformational” investment in drainage for years to come.

The district’s current tax rate is 3.1 cents per $100 of assessed value. That works out to an annual tax bill of about $94 for the owner of a $380,000 home with a 20 percent homestead exemption.

Commissioners Court is proposing a flood control district tax rate of 4.879 cents per $100 of assessed value. If approved by voters, that would mean an additional $60 from that owner.

If voters reject the measure, the tax rate would default to the highest rate allowed under state law without voter approval, which is 8 percent.

The default rate normally is 3.5 percent, but because of the emergency declarations from the derecho and Hurricane Beryl, local governments are able to flex the rate higher, officials said.

Commissioners Court will hold a public hearing on the proposed increase on Aug. 15.

[…]

Harris County is looking at spending $5 billion on flood control projects over the next five years, county Budget Director Daniel Ramos said.

“If we don’t have the maintenance dollars to maintain those (projects), they’re going to fail,” he said.

Ramos said the county also has lent the flood control district $59 million in the past year. Raising the tax rate would help create a financially sustainable department, he said.

Precinct 3 Commissioner Tom Ramsey said the increased tax rate is long overdue.

“If you live in Harris County, you live in a floodplain,” Ramsey said. “And since we live in a floodplain, shouldn’t that be one of our highest focused areas?”

Personally, I think that if Harris County Commissioners Court decides that the Flood Control District needs more revenue to do what it does, they should just be able to raise the rate and be done with it. Let the people vote out the Commissioners if they disagree. We always have to do things the hard way in this state. Be that as it may, I’m wondering what voter outreach there will be for this. Campaigning for a bond is one thing, this feels a little different. I suspect most people support the idea of doing more flood mitigation work, and the Republican on the Court supporting the increase blunts the usual attack lines against it. But you can never take these things for granted, so I’ll be interested to see what is done to ensure its passage.

Posted in Election 2024, Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Harris County Flood Control District tax hike proposal on the ballot

So many teachers gone

I just can’t see how this is a good thing.

More than 4,000 employees left Houston ISD in June, bringing the total departures since the state takeover to over 10,000.

The record number is three times higher than the June departure average for the past five years, according to a Houston Chronicle analysis of district employment records. Over 75% of the departures were recorded as “voluntary,” including retirements and resignations.

Teachers accounted for more than 2,400 of the employees who left in June, with the monthly tally exceeding the total number of teachers who typically leave HISD over an entire school year, according to the analysis. About 4,700 of HISD’s roughly 11,000 teachers left the district during the 2023-24 school year.

Some teachers cited state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles’ strict new reforms and sudden class assignment changes as the reasons they left. June’s bloated number of departures includes job cuts and terminations linked to job status notices.

Jackie Anderson, president of the Houston Federation of Teachers, which represents 7,000 HISD employees, called the level of departures “unprecedented.”

“As to how many vacant positions exist, we are concerned because school is about to start next week, and we don’t want to see our classrooms without certified teachers. This is a very high number,” Anderson said.

[…]

The Chronicle requested the number of vacancies the district sought to fill over the summer. The district commented via email, “Houston ISD’s number one priority is making sure that every HISD student, has access to high-quality instruction in every classroom, every day. Because of the remarkable success of our students over the past year, we’ve seen an unprecedented number of talented educators who want to work with Houston ISD’s students.”

A district spokesperson wrote that principals have been hired for all but one campus. The Chronicle found that 76 principals left their positions in June.

“Additionally, HISD has only 43 teaching vacancies to fill across the entire district, and the North Division has filled every single teaching vacancy,” a spokesperson wrote. “This is remarkable considering that just two years ago, the District began with 640 vacancies, and thousands of students didn’t have a teacher on the first day of school.”

Anderson, the Houston Federation of Teachers president, stressed the need for certified, qualified teachers to fill vacancies.

“And we don’t want to see them just picking people off of the street, putting them in a classroom in front of our students for the sake of saying that there’s a teacher in the classroom,” the union leader said. “Because we really believe that high-quality instruction must be given by someone who is qualified, capable and well-trained to deliver that instruction.”

HISD said it sent out 6,500 teacher contracts just ahead of the last day of school and that there are an additional 250 to 300 teachers on continuing contracts that did not require renewal.

Because enrollment is declining, it is likely that HISD will employ fewer teachers. The district reported 183,900 students in late October, a drop of more than 6,000 from the 2022-23 school year and more than 30,000 since 2016-17. The district hit a 10-year peak of about 216,000 students that year.

The district did not comment on the extent to which it is hiring uncertified teachers. At least 830 uncertified teachers worked in HISD in the last academic year.

This was a followup to the principal departure story. It came out before the story on CityCast Houston episode that while he expects enrollment to continue its downward trend, he thinks maybe the district’s improved performance will attract people back to HISD, away from charters and other options. Maybe he’s right – we’ll know soon enough. I fear he’s not and that HISD will be changed in ways we didn’t want or expect when he was foisted on us.

UPDATE: And then there’s this.

Houston ISD hired around 850 uncertified teachers for the upcoming school year, more than matching the number of uncertified teachers employed across the district last year, state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles said at a Thursday press conference.

That means roughly 1 in 3 of the 2,770 teacher vacancies at the end of the last school year were filled with teachers without proper credentials. Those educators have two years to earn certification, he said.

At last count, HISD had 47 teaching vacancies, Miles said.

Copy all my previous comments about the unsustainability of all this and paste them here.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

HISD approves the bond referendum for November

I expect there will be some vigorous campaigning over this. I’ll be very interested to see how much money gets raised and spent.

Houston ISD will ask voters in November to pass the biggest school bond package in Texas history, after the district’s state-appointed board members voted unanimously Thursday to approve putting the $4.4 billion measure on the ballot.

The package, which pledges not to raise property tax rates, proposes to fund campus rebuilds, fixes to faulty air systems, school security upgrades and other improvements.

District leaders said the measure is sorely needed because HISD has gone longer than the recommended time period since its last bond, leaving students to learn in too-hot classrooms and under leaky roofs. HISD’s most recent bond election came 12 years ago, while large urban school districts typically pass bonds roughly every five years.

“We have a lot of kids today whose parents went to school in the same building,” board member Rolando Martinez said. “Their same grandparents came to their school in temporary buildings that are now being used. Our schools need new buildings.”

However, a faction of Houstonians have vocally opposed the proposal, arguing they cannot trust HISD leaders to responsibly manage a multibillion-dollar bond package. Texas’ largest school district has been embroiled in controversy for over a year, after Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath appointed a new superintendent, Mike Miles, and nine-member board in June 2023 amid academic sanctions against HISD.

“Mr. Miles refuses to listen to feedback or adjust his plans based on concerns he hears from anyone,” said Heather Golden, the parent of a high school student at Houston Academy for International Studies. “We cannot give him more money.”

See here for the most recent update. The Chron adds some details.

The proposal, if passed, would allocate about $2 billion for rebuilding and renovating schools and $1.35 billion for lead abatement, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning improvements and security upgrades. It would also provide $1 billion to expand pre-K, build three new career and technical education centers and make technology upgrades.

[…]

The bond will be split up on the ballot into two propositions. Proposition A would allocate $3.96 billion for school building renovations and expansions, including safety and security infrastructure, while Proposition B would allocate $440,000 for technology equipment, systems and infrastructure. It would not raise taxes if approved, according to the district.

Eligible voters will be able to cast separate votes on each proposition, as Texas state law requires school districts to put the “acquisition or update of technology equipment” as a separate proposition on the ballot when issuing a bond election. The election order also authorizes Miles to execute contracts and agreements to carry out the election process.

[…]

Among other proposals, the bond would allocate $580 million to move, or “co-locate,” students at eight schools to seven existing campuses, which would be renovated or rebuilt to accommodate the new students. The schools would operate independently and retain their own staff and while sharing larger communal areas like cafeterias and gyms, according to the district.

[…]

The bond also would spend $425 million on CTE centers to expand students’ access to career programs, including $375 million to build three new centers in the south, west and central divisions of the district, and $50 million for renovations at Barbara Jordan Career Center, which is the only established CTE center in HISD.

First, I’m pretty sure that Prop B would allocate $440 million, not $440K, as the latter is chump change in this context and the overall package doesn’t add up to $4.4 billion otherwise. It sounds like nothing has changed since the last Board discussion, despite some reservations and unanswered questions about why we want all those CTE centers. We’re just swimming in oversight over here.

As previously discussed, my inclination is to vote for this bond. I have objections to some of its aspects as noted above, and I don’t trust Mike Miles at all. But the need is too great, and I just don’t see how voting the bond down advances any anti-Miles interests. He’s not going to leave any sooner if this fails. One could argue that he’s more likely to leave sooner, or at least on time, if HISD is able to spend the money to fix the plumbing and air conditioning and such on so many campuses, as that will be beneficial for the students.

I don’t begrudge anyone’s opposition – I totally get it. I just don’t see myself voting against this. Supporting school bond issuances is normally such an easy thing to do, and I hate that it’s plausible and reasonable to consider otherwise. I wish we had done this a few years ago, which would make a delay now less burdensome. But we didn’t, and here we are. That’s how I see it. You are welcome to see it differently.

Posted in Election 2024, School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Of course the I-10 project will cost more than expected

The sun rises in the east, water is wet, etc etc etc.

Lifting Interstate 10 out of White Oak Bayou’s floodway is poised to cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars more than anticipated, as bids to build the project came in above $400 million.

Last week in Austin, Texas Department of Transportation officials opened bids on the project to elevate I-10 between Interstate 45 and Heights Boulevard. The apparent low bidder, Webber LLC, offered a construction price of $407.8 million. Williams Brothers Construction, the only other firm to submit a bid, priced the job at $459.5 million.

If state highway officials accept the Webber offer, it would be $62.8 million more than officials estimated the work to cost, after increasing their prediction from the $312 million they expected two years ago. Combined with other assorted costs, such as right of way, the project’s total cost could top $440 million.

The price increase is not likely to make officials rethink raising the freeway.

“There is no delay or pause anticipated,” TxDOT spokeswoman Kristina Hadley wrote in an email, noting that all projects are still subject approval by the Texas Transportation Commission.

Of course it won’t. Only mass transit projects are affected by cost increases. I doubt TxDOT would have blinked if the low cost estimate had been double what it was. That’s just not how this works.

As discussions of the managed and transit lanes being combined continue, the elevation work is set to start sometime between November and January, Hadley said. Work will start on the westbound portion of the freeway, leading to the lanes being narrowed and traffic shifted toward the center of the freeway.

“There will also be a temporary adjustment to the I-10 westbound exit ramp to Heights Boulevard to maintain that operation during the first phase of construction,” Hadley wrote.

Eastbound lanes and the HOV ramp to downtown will be unaffected by the first phase of work.

Changes and delays, meanwhile, are inevitable as construction proceeds. Lanes will be reduced in some locations to 11 feet, from the typical 12-foot width. Westbound will also drop from four lanes to three until the new elevated lanes are built, Hadley said, with some entrance and exit changes during construction.

Once the westbound lanes are on the new elevated roadway, workers will move on to the HOV lane and eastbound lanes.

Work is expected to take about four years after the start of construction, during which costs can continue to rise or weather can delay progress.

Emphasis mine. Uuuuuuuuuugggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhh.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Dispatches from Dallas, August 9 edition

This is a weekly feature produced by my friend Ginger. Let us know what you think.

This week, in news from Dallas-Fort Worth, we have another grab bag including: Six Degrees of Clarence Thomas; election news; shenanigans in Fort Worth; law enforcement news, mostly about the jail, from Tarrant County; suburban school district news; the DMN’s opinions about all sorts of local news; the state of Dallas’ community pools; religious buildings in the burbs; new local music; the State Fair finalist foods (with photos); and more.

This week’s post was brought to you by the music of local heroine St Vincent.

Let’s jump right in:

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Dispatches from Dallas, August 9 edition

July 2024 campaign finance reports – City of Houston

PREVIOUSLY:
Senate and Congress
State offices
Harris County offices

No preambles here. This used to be a dead time in the city electoral cycle, as no one was allowed to fundraise until the January of the election year. That’s long since been ended. This is now the time that some folks begin to build back their campaign treasuries. Let’s have a look.


Name          Raised      Spent       Loan     On Hand
======================================================
Whitmire     591,220    468,079          0   2,542,941

Hollins       87,594    145,863          0     205,616

Ramirez       81,269     17,469     30,000      62,536
Davis
Carter        20,850      4,132      4,000      20,212
Plummer
Alcorn

Peck          33,850     14,655          0      57,972
Jackson
Kamin        101,572     14,503          0     301,721
E-Shabazz      9,500      8,375          0       1,759
Flickinger    25,650     26,646    103,000       9,313
Thomas
Huffman       42,800     17,154          0      28,020
Castillo      67,393     28,507          0      43,394
Martinez      61,952     30,175          0      90,298
Pollard      162,275     33,516     40,000   1,037,040
C-Tatum       64,397     13,244          0     274,871

Turner             0    310,693          0     514,728
Robinson           0    206,878          0     235,112
Jackson Lee   15,000     21,742          0      28,815
Khan           5,000          0      5,000         539
Edwards            0      7,508          0       3,592
Laster             0          0          0     144,383

The January 2024 reports are here. That includes links to posts about the later reports from the 2023 election. Neither Fred Flickinger nor Letitia Plummer had a January report on the site; everyone else listed here did so. Plummer and the others with blanks do not have one for July. As with the January reports, I didn’t save the ones I did find to my Google drive. I’ll do that again when we’re in the next campaign season.

The reports for David Robinson and Sylvester Turner come with an asterisk: For Robinson, $6,878 of the listed spending is for things like wages/salaries/labor, and $200K is for the purchase of certificates of deposit at Veritex Community Bank. For Turner, $250K was used to buy a CD, at the same bank. In other words, they moved a bunch of leftover campaign cash into an interest-bearing account. At some point they will have to spend or donate it, but that day is not today.

I don’t have anything particular to say about these totals. As noted, this is the time when incumbents, especially new ones and ones who were in runoffs, refill their coffers. You can like that or not, it is what it is. But from here on, for the rest of the year, or at least through November, no one who considers themselves a Democrat should be raising money for anything except candidates on the ballot now. I will be looking at the January 2025 reports with a very close eye for that. Anyone who does otherwise should be expected to face some pointed questions about it. The same will be true, with some more leeway, in 2026. The election in front of us is – or at least should be – the priority. Never has that been more true than now. I hope everyone gets the memo on that.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on July 2024 campaign finance reports – City of Houston

HISD reports significant drop in D and F-rated campuses

This is very good news.

Houston ISD state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles said Wednesday that the number of the district’s schools that earned a D or F rating in the Texas Education Agency’s accountability ratings dropped by about two-thirds compared to the unofficial ratings the district calculated last year under revamped, harder standards that were protested by districts across the state.

The TEA typically assigns annual A to F ratings to each public district and campus based on standardized test performance, student growth, and progress on closing racial and socioeconomic achievement gaps, although it hasn’t done so for all campuses since 2019 due to COVID-19 and legal challenges. The agency plans to release official scores on Aug. 15 based on performance data from the 2023-24 school year.

HISD reported that 41 schools earned D or F ratings in 2024, which is down from 121 in the unofficial 2023 ratings, and the number of A- and B-rated schools increased from 93 to 170, according to preliminary data. In 2022, prior to the most recent overhaul of the state accountability system, 10 HISD campuses received Ds or Fs.

The district must keep all schools from earning consecutive failing grades, along with meeting certain additional criteria, to end the state takeover and restore an elected board.

The district’s reported decline in D and F-rated schools comes after it saw several percentage point gains in student performance on the reading and math State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, even as average performance statewide on the exams largely declined.

Miles said he attributed the district’s decline in D and F schools this year to what he described as improved quality of instruction, additional training for campus leaders, efforts to implement a stronger curriculum and a “high performance culture.”

“The (TEA’s) exit criteria calls for zero campuses that have a D or F rating, so we took a big chunk out of the 121 and if we continue to work hard and work well, we’ll get that 41 down to single digits at the end of this school year,” Miles said.

Let’s be clear up front that this is great news. It’s great for the students, and it’s great for the End of the Takeover Countdown. One of the many infuriating things about this whole situation is that you have to root for Mike Miles to succeed so that we can be rid of him. Grit your teeth if you must, but him succeeding is the vastly better option than him failing, no matter how satisfying the “told you so” would have been.

I think implementing the change in how reading is taught was a big part of this. HISD was already headed in the direction of making that change, though whether Superintendent Millard House and the elected Board could have made it happen last year is unclear. He got it done, so he gets the credit for it. Putting more resources into the NES schools has helped – and again, I marvel at how the official solution to underperforming schools is to throw more money at them, just like we’ve always said they should – though I remain concerned about how sustainable it is given the state’s continued fiscal penury and the fact that HISD has taken away a bunch of money from other schools to make this work.

In the end, we have to ask, could we have gotten something like these improvements without all the turmoil and turnover and utter indifference to how anyone felt about any of this? We will all be deliriously happy to see the back of Mike Miles when he finally leaves not because he was incompetent but because he’s an asshole who made so many of us miserable, for reasons we still don’t understand. Not that I’d wish it on them, but maybe some other large urban district will have to go through this, but will get a less bulldozer-like Superintendent to do the job, and then we can get some kind of comparison. In the meantime, we are one day closer to getting rid of Mike Miles. If you want to grit your teeth a little harder, you can hear him talk about the accountability grades and avoid answering some questions on Monday’s CityCast Houston podcast, and Houston Landing has more.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Translators needed for non-criminal courts

Of interest.

Harris County has long afforded free interpreters to people navigating criminal cases, but it does not always offer the same to those with civil cases, local lawyers say. The denial for interpreters has become so routine that some legal advocates say they rarely even submit requests anymore.

Harris County has a population of 4.7 million people who speak more than 145 languages, according to U.S. Census Data. The county, however, has only 92 court-certified interpreters, according to the Texas Office of Court Administration Judicial Branch Certification Commission database that tracks the information.

Legal advocates and attorneys say the lack of interpreters, combined with what they say is a lack of cooperation from the judiciary, creates an unnecessary barrier for people to get justice.

The problem is not unique or new to Houston.

In 2010, Harris County was sued by the Texas Civil Rights Project for not providing a civil court interpreter to a woman with limited English proficiency. The woman, who was not named in the lawsuit, had gone to court to seek a protective order, custody of her young daughter and child support after leaving an abusive relationship. Living in a shelter and barely able to support her family, the woman was forced to pay more than $1,000 to hire interpreters to attend hearings.

The county ended up agreeing to a settlement in which it committed to adopting a formal plan to provide interpreters to indigent litigants and witnesses in civil hearings relating to family matters.

In neighboring Fort Bend County, the U.S. Department of Justice launched an investigation in 2021 in response to complaints that its district and county courts had denied meaningful access to people with limited English proficiency. The probe ended in a settlement that required the county to develop a plan for tackling language barriers, including offering interpreters for free in civil and criminal cases. Federal investigators said in August 2023 that the jurisdiction complied with its settlement terms and closed the investigation.

Harris County Commissioners Adrian Garcia and Lesley Briones say the problem has long been on their radar. If the county does not solve the problem, Garcia said he fears the county could face a federal investigation next.

The Commissioners Court’s power is limited, however: the county could develop a more comprehensive policy to fund interpreters at the civil courthouse, but it is up to courts and judges to implement and utilize that policy.

[…]

Certified interpreters are required in court for a number of reasons, including conflicts of interest and a need for specialized training to avoid making mistakes while translating complex testimony.

Interpreters in Houston often require a two-hour minimum for services, which can present an additional obstacle to litigants. In addition to the financial burden — services typically can cost $200 or more an hour — it can present logistical challenges.

Case hearings often last mere minutes, lawyers said, and frequently are postponed. Clients, nonetheless, still are on the hook for the interpreter minimum. And if a case goes to trial, an individual could be looking at thousands of dollars just to make sure they understand what is going on. The cost, lawyers said, often results in people opting to drop their legal cases.

That’s the issue in a nutshell. There’s a lot more to the story, so go read the rest. I assume this is not just a Harris county issue and not even just a Texas issue but a national one, though there’s no mention about how the problem is being addressed elsewhere. There’s some tug of war between the Commissioners and the courts over what has and has not been done and what still needs to be done; I’m sure a lawsuit or federal investigation would sharpen the focus, but I’d rather it not come to that. Cost and the availability of qualified translators is an issue, and if all of the jurisdictions that should be addressing this try to do so, I’m sure we’d run into some shortages. The bottom line is that everyone should be able to access the courts, and that means that translators need to be more widely available. How we get there from here is the big question.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Translators needed for non-criminal courts

Texas blog roundup for the week of August 5

The Texas Progressive Alliance is now a fan of women’s rugby and the pommel horse as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of August 5

Two small updates on the CD18 race

From this Trib overview of the five candidates “with extensive elected experience” in the CD18 race:

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee

Since the candidate selection is internal within the party, there is no formal filing process for candidates and precinct chairs could theoretically choose anyone. Of the 15 Democrats who have been in touch with the county party, five run with extensive elected experience: former Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner, former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards — who faced off against Jackson Lee in the primary, state Rep. Jarvis Johnson, state Rep. Christina Morales and Houston City Council member Letitia Plummer. Former Houston City Council Member Dwight Boykins, who put his name in the ring on Friday, said Monday that he dropped out of the race after Jackson Lee’s family endorsed Turner.

The election is separate from the special election on the same day for a representative to serve out the rest of Jackson Lee’s current term, which ends on Jan. 3, 2025. Candidates have until Aug. 22 to run in the special election.

[…]

In his bid to succeed Jackson Lee, Turner is highlighting his relationship with her, promising to continue fighting for some of her biggest priorities, including securing federal funds for Houston. Jackson Lee brought in millions of federal dollars throughout her time in Congress for Houston flood control, health care and public safety. Turner also supports legislation to protect women from domestic violence, codify access to abortion federally, protect LGBTQ rights and enhance transparency in policing.

But Turner, who opted not to challenge his old friend in the Democratic primary, is also the oldest major candidate at 69 years old and said he would serve a maximum of two terms if elected — a fact others seeking the nomination said would limit his ability to build seniority in the hierarchical Congress.

The endorsement of Turner came out after my weekend update, so this is my first chance to acknowledge that former CM Boykins has withdrawn from consideration. It’s possible others could do the same – Turner’s overall list of endorsements from elected officials is pretty fearsome – but so far this is what we have. There are multiple other candidates of lesser visibility, though the question of whether they can get a precinct chair to nominate them and another chair to second the nomination may render that moot.

As for Mayor Turner’s two-term pledge, he mentioned that he intended to only serve for a limited duration when he spoke to me about his candidacy. (Reminder, I’m a precinct chair, I’ve heard from all of the named candidates, they’re surely trying to reach all 90 or so of us.) He didn’t give an exact number to me, but I assumed he meant something like two or three terms. Now I know which it is. It’s a reasonable approach and I appreciate the thought. One could argue that it would be better for the next member of Congress in CD18 to start accruing seniority right way. I’ll leave it at that.

One last thought, as this has been brought up in the comments, is that we could get a runoff in the CD18 special election, which would mean that the eventual winner would have even less time to serve in Congress; it would also mean more expenses for Harris County and the County Clerk, who I’m sure is mainlining Advil at the thought of yet another goddam election this year. Maybe we’ll get at most two candidates. Maybe one candidate will have the name ID to win outright regardless. Maybe the runnerup will do us all a favor and bow out of the runoff. I can’t wrap my head around it right now. Just know that it’s a possibility.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

New Mexico seeks to poach Texas doctors

Clever.

The governor of New Mexico on Sunday announced an initiative intended to lure Texas doctors and other medical professionals to relocate to her state.

New Mexico’s Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham aimed this effort specifically at those medical professionals impacted by Texas’ abortion ban.

In a letter published as a full-page advertisement in the Sunday editions of the San Antonio Express-News and newspapers in Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth and Houston, Lujan Grisham launched the “Free to Provide” campaign to promote New Mexico’s commitment to providing complete health care, including abortion access.

The campaign also uses billboards to share the message.

On Sunday, Lujan Grisham posted on social media, “This ain’t Texas,” a reference to the popular country crossover song by Beyonce. “Here, you’re free to provide and practice what you were trained to do in medical school.”

And in a separate post, she said that physicians can work in her state “without interference from politicians or police.”

[…]

The “Free to Provide” website includes varied resources, including information about job opportunities, scholarship opportunities, and a brief guide to cultural events and sights around the state.

The governor’s office maintains that “Free to Provide” is part of a broader effort to improve healthcare in New Mexico with competitive incentives.

It’s a smart idea. We’ve seen plenty of stories about how states with abortion bans are finding it hard to attract and retain doctors. Not just OB-GYNs, either, but all kinds of doctors. It’s easy to understand why, and while I think there’s a limit to this, there’s no reason why a state like New Mexico shouldn’t be out there waving their credentials in front of any MD that might be rethinking their future. I hope someone tracks the data on this, I’d love to see what the effect is in a year or two.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on New Mexico seeks to poach Texas doctors

What’s in a name, Bexar County GOP 2024 version

Hilarious.

Kristian Carranza

Bexar County GOP officials said they may file a lawsuit against Texas House District 118 candidate Kristian Carranza, a Democrat, alleging that she changed her last name from Thompson to appeal to voters on the city’s largely Latino South Side.

Carranza is running against Republican incumbent Texas Rep. John Lujan, who’s represented the district since 2021. A political newcomer, Carranza won the Democratic primary against Carlos Quezada in May, securing 63% of the vote. Since then, she’s been running an aggressive ground campaign, knocking on doors and attenting community events.

The Bexar County GOP’s move comes as Carranza continues to make gains in the tightly contested race for a district Democrats hope to flip. District 118 has traditionally leaned blue.

During a Tuesday press conference in front of Bexar County Courthouse, county Republican Chairwoman Kris Coons argued that her party’s potential legal action isn’t about trying to protect Lujan’s seat but to shield voters from Carranza’s “youthful deception.”

“We believe that [her last name] was changed, possibly, you know, to have a beautiful Hispanic last name in a beautiful Hispanic district to influence voters,” Coons said.

Carranza was born Kristian Kelly Renee Thompson. However, she legally changed her last name from Thompson to Carranza, her mother’s maiden name, in January 2023 — nine months before the candidate registration deadline, according to documents filed with the state.

In a statement, Carranza maintains that she changed her last name to her mother’s maiden name because she’s estranged from her father.

“I take my last name from my single mother who raised me, not my absent father,” Carranza said. “My mom and grandmother raised me on the Southside [sic] — and I’m incredibly proud of my family’s story.”

[…]

A notice the Bexar County GOP sent to the media on Monday announcing its press conference said the party “intends to pursue a lawsuit” against Carranza. However, Coons admitted during Tuesday’s event that attorneys hadn’t yet done so. Lawyers will “be reviewing [the facts] and consider filing,” she added.

What’s more, Coons couldn’t elaborate on what law Carranza allegedly broke when she changed her name.

“I’ll let our lawyers tell you that, my friend,” Coons told reporters.

I Am Not A Lawyer, but I can tell you, my friend, that there is no law that Candidate Carranza has violated. This is her legal name. Even if it weren’t, Texas law is generally pretty lenient about what you can call yourself on a ballot, the occasional Grandma Strayhorn situations excepted. For example, if “Carranza” were her husband’s name, she could almost certainly use it on the ballot or not whether she had legally taken it or not. The GOP is welcome to make a campaign issue out of this – and for sure that’s what they’re doing here, to try to protect an endangered incumbent from a well-resourced opponent – but an actual lawsuit would be laughed out of court. Thanks for the giggle, y’all. The Trib has more.

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What’s in a name, Bexar County GOP 2024 version

Endorsement watch: SJL’s kids for Turner

From the inbox:

Sylvester Turner

Over the past several weeks we’ve been overwhelmed by the outpouring of support and love from the residents of the 18th Congressional District. Countless people have reached out to express not only condolences for our mother’s death, but to share personal testimonies about her impact on their lives. Our mother was a true public servant who loved the people she served, and it has been gratifying to know that love was reciprocated.

While no one will ever replace Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, there must be a successor. Our greatest hope is that her immediate successor has the capacity and commitment to sustain the service upon which the constituents of the 18th District have come to rely. For that reason we are proud to endorse Sylvester Turner for the 18th Congressional District.

We have no doubt Mayor Turner will carry on our mother’s legacy of service because we’ve witnessed it almost our entire lives. Our mother had no greater partner than Mayor Turner and he honors her with his willingness to dutifully and humbly serve as a sturdy bridge to the next generation of leadership for the historic 18th Congressional District of Texas.

The giants of the 18th Congressional District came to leadership through affirmation, not coronation. And so it should be for those that would assume the mantle for the future. This seat belongs to the people of the 18th, and the people–who affirmed Barbara, Mickey and Sheila–will no doubt identify and select the 18th’s next great champion as well.

We look forward to supporting Sylvester Turner as the next Congressman of the 18th Congressional District, as well as supporting the next generational leader who earns the people’s trust.

Jason Lee and Erica Lee Carter

I got this in my inbox yesterday morning; the Chron reported on it later in the day. An endorsement like this would be very powerful in a primary race. How much will it matter in an election where the entire voter universe is at most 90 people? I have no idea. I’ll find out a week from today, when I and the rest of those precinct chairs get together to cast our votes. I’ll be at the candidate forum on Saturday as well (see here at the bottom for details) and may get a sense of what’s to come then. What’s your reaction to this?

Posted in Election 2024 | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Questioning the police response to the Santa Fe school shooting

Interesting.

Testimony by a former Galveston County sheriff’s deputy Thursday raised questions about how fast and effectively police responded to the mass shooting inside Santa Fe High School.

Sgt. Brent Cooley, retired from the Galveston County Sheriff’s Office, testified that he waited for other officers to join him before approaching the art room where Dimitrios Pagourtzis is accused of killing eight students and two teachers during the May 18, 2018, shooting.

“I knew that if I had gone into the door by myself, he would have killed me,” Cooley said, and that Pagourtzis’ position inside the classroom had created a “fatal funnel” that would have exposed him to danger as well.

“I chose not to kill myself,” Cooley said.

Cooley, the officer who eventually handcuffed Pagourtzis when he surrendered to police, bristled while responding to questioning from defense attorney Lori Laird, herself a former police officer. Laird suggested that he waited 30 minutes to breach the classroom and asked how many of the Santa Fe victims may have bled to death while officers waited to breach the room.

“Be careful at what you are suggesting,” Cooley said at one point.

“It’s not as simple as you’re trying to put it,” he said at another point.

Cooley and another officer testified that officers exchanged gunfire with Pagourtzis.

Laird attempted to have security footage from inside the school be shown to the jury, but that request was denied by County Court at Law Judge Jack Ewing.

Victims and their families filed a lawsuit against the shooting suspect, seeking damage for battery, and his parents, Antonios Pagourtzis and Rose Mary Kosmetatos, for negligence over allegations that they didn’t safely secure the guns used in the shootings and didn’t act to address their son’s mental illness before the shooting.

Thursday’s testimony raised the specter of the police criticism that would become a national outrage in the Uvalde school shooting in 2022.

Late Thursday, family members of Santa Fe shooting victims said they were frustrated by the defense attorney’s efforts to deflect blame for the shooting.

“I’m not here to talk about what the police did or didn’t do, I’m here to talk about the parents who didn’t lock up their guns,” said Rhonda Hart, the mother of shooting victim Kimberly Vaughan.

Defense attorneys during opening arguments suggested that blame should also be cast on other groups that aren’t party to the lawsuit, including the Santa Fe Independent School District and the company that sold ammunition to the then-17-year-old suspect.

[…]

Neither state nor federal agencies have ever investigated or issued a report on the Santa Fe shooting. Pagourtzis’ criminal trial on capital murder charges has been indefinitely delayed after he was ruled mentally incompetent to stand trial and sent for treatment to a state hospital in North Texas.

Parents have called on the federal government to open a belated investigation into the shooting.

“We want this information public,” said Scot Rice, the husband of wounded teacher Flo Rice. “We want everybody to listen and learn from this.”

I’ve only written a little about the Santa Fe mass shooting, so I have no idea if there have long been questions about the police response or if this is something new. I favor there being a federal investigation either way, and for there to be more such investigations across the country. We’ve done so little in other areas to prevent and mitigate mass shootings, we may as well aim to force improvements in this area.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Questioning the police response to the Santa Fe school shooting