From the “Time has no meaning” department

This is so stupid.

Texas lawmakers have disagreed for years over whether and how to abolish the unpopular semiannual clock change in the state, but a bill that is on its way to the governor will finally bring an end to that debate — if Congress also acts.

House Bill 1393 by Conroe Republican Rep. Will Metcalf would establish “Texas Time,” or permanent daylight saving time in the state, if federal lawmakers later allow states to do so.

“Right now, the federal government does not allow the states to make this change, so this is effectively a trigger bill,” said Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, who sponsored the bill in the upper chamber.

Under the federal Uniform Time Act of 1966, states may not currently adopt permanent daylight saving time, but they can opt out of time changes by sticking with standard time year-round. That’s how states like Arizona and Hawaii can keep from changing their clocks twice a year.

Texas joins 18 other states that have passed similar permanent daylight saving time measures, and there’s interest at the federal level in allowing the change.

Look, I’m a lifelong defender of the current system, but I’m not going to try to dissuade you if you hate the time changes. But if we are going to get away from that – maybe, someday, if federal law changes – can we at least agree that permanent standard time is what makes the most sense? Because right now what the Lege has done is move Texas out of Central time and into Eastern time. You do know that Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama are all in Central time, right? That means we could have a situation where you drive west from Florida and you go from Eastern time to Central time and then back again to Eastern time. Hell, if say Mississippi gets the bright idea to do what we just did, you could go Eastern-Central-Eastern-Central-Eastern, all in the space of a day’s drive.

And then there’s that small piece of Texas near and including El Paso that’s now on Mountain time. What happens to it? Does it move to Central time, or does it become like the rest of the state and join Eastern time. If the latter, then every border crossing into New Mexico is now a two-hour time change; if the former, it’s for crossings that emanate from places like Odessa and Lubbock and Abilene. And now going north into Oklahoma is also a time change. How does any of this make sense?

Like I said, maybe none of this ever happens. Or maybe, if we do insist on killing DST federally, the mandate is that we just stay in the standard time of the time zone we’re now in. That would at least be reasonable, even if I hated it. But this? This is chaos, and the reason why the world adopted standard time zones in the first place. Only in Texas, I swear to God. The Barbed Wire has more.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Rice seeks naming deal for Rice Stadium

I dunno about this.

Rice Stadium opened in 1950, once held a maximum capacity of 70,000, and has played host to a Super Bowl and presidential speech. It’s also one of the most direct and to the point names for any venue out there. But now, Rice University is looking to rename the 47,000-seat stadium, and is searching for partners.

Rice’s athletic department announced on Wednesday that it will work with Independent Sports and Entertainment to identify a potential naming rights partner for its stadium, which also hosts various concerts and other sporting events.

“We are excited to work with ISE as we seek a naming rights partner for Rice Stadium,” said Rice Vice President and Director of Athletics Tommy McClelland. “It is more important than ever that we continue to be creative and open-minded as we explore new ways to invest in our student-athletes and ensure that we are providing them with a best-in-class experience.”

Rice aims to improve its athletic performance, especially in football, as new head coach Scott Abell begins his first year. Furthermore, keeping pace with the competition is evidently important for Rice, as more schools invest in their athletic programs with resources for infrastructure, NIL funds, and personnel to strengthen their teams. With the new revenue-sharing model impacting college sports, securing naming rights appears to be a logical next step.

[…]

So, who will get naming rights for Rice Stadium? Toyota (Houston Rockets), NRG (Houston Texans), and Daikin (Houston Astros) currently adorn the venues of the city’s professional teams. Can I interest you in a Buc-ee’s Stadium for the Owls? How about H-E-B Stadium for a clash between Rice and Houston? Stadiums also do well with good nicknames, so maybe we could get Blue Bell Stadium and call it “The Bell?”

With the 2025 college football season starting in three months, fans should expect a deal to be finalized by August.

The jokes are flying among the Owl fans, too. I can live with this, as long as it’s not too janky and doesn’t involve any truly evil people or corporations (you can surely infer what I have in mind here). The one thing I am sure of is that the MOB will have something to say about it this fall. Come to the first game or two in September and see for yourself what that will be. Rice’s statement on the deal is here.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston, Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Weekend link dump for June 1

“Even Where Abortion Is Still Legal, Many Brick-and-Mortar Clinics Are Closing“.

“The options for paying tribute to the president, his kin, and the MAGA movement are now legion. There are even exciting new opportunities to protect your business by reaching a “settlement” with the leader of the free world. Or you can just hand over a 747 for him to use as Air Force One, as Qatar did. Best of all, these creative funding methods might not even be against the law—especially for Trump. (Thanks, SCOTUS!) So here’s your guide to participating in the brave new Trumpworld of executive enrichment.”

“A hacker who breached the communications service used by former Trump national security adviser Mike Waltz earlier this month intercepted messages from a broader swathe of American officials than has previously been reported, according to a Reuters review, potentially raising the stakes of a breach that has already drawn questions about data security in the Trump administration.”

Dear Tim Cook: This is why you don’t bend the knee. Learn something from the experience.

“This Is How ‘The Price Is Right’ Contestants Make It On To The Game Show”.

NPB’s Central League doesn’t have a designated hitter rule, one of the last professional holdouts against the DH. Will they eventually join their peers? (Note: Pitchers in the CL are batting .106 so far this season. So, you know, bad.)

“The tragedy of prevention goes like this: The most effective way to save lives (prevention) is the least noticeable, which leads us to undervaluing it in our individual choices, in what we celebrate, and in public policy, and that undervaluing of prevention leads to a great deal of needless death and suffering.”

“You’ve probably been busy the past three months going to work, paying bills, living your life. You probably haven’t been following every incremental development in the ongoing negotiations over the future format of the College Football Playoff beginning in 2026. So, allow me to catch you up.”

“But wastewater has run into a rather ironic conundrum: It has become valuable.”

RIP, Mara Corday, early Playboy model and actor best known for the classic 1950s creature feature Tarantula.

RIP, Peter David, novelist, comic book writer on “The Incredible Hulk” and others, screenwriter on Babylon 5 and others.

RIP, Charles Rangel, former longtime Democratic Congressman from New York.

“The point here is that everyone knows this. Everyone knows that this president abuses the powers of his office and is constantly threatening to abuse those powers further against anyone who doesn’t “eat the tariffs” or fire all the non-white professors or whatever cruel and capricious thing the misfiring synapses in his syphilitic brain come up with next.”

“New research shows that penguin guano in Antarctica is an important source of ammonia aerosol particles that help drive the formation and persistence of low clouds, which cool the climate by reflecting some incoming sunlight back to space.”

RIP, Ronnie Duggar, founding editor and longtime publisher of the Texas Observer.

“National Public Radio and three of its local stations sued President Donald Trump on Tuesday, arguing that his executive order cutting funding to the 246-station network violates their free speech and relies on an authority that he does not have.”

“It’s a pretty straightforward dynamic we’re probably all familiar with. In any social context if you make it hard to express criticism or anything but approved opinions you quickly have very little idea what people actually think. Because you’ve made it impossible for them to tell you. At the government level that’s very helpful for the people in power. But it also gives them less visibility into what people think, where public opinion actually is.”

RIP, José Griñán, longtime Houston news anchor who reported onsite at the Branch Davidian compound in 1995.

Here are the three new lead actors for the questionable HBO reboot of the Harry Potter series. I for one will not watch, but I will spectate. I hope these three kids have good support systems in place, because that’s going to be a bumpy ride.

RIP, Rick Derringer, guitarist, singer, songwriter, and producer whose hits include “Hang On Sloopy” and “Rock and Roll Hootchie Koo”.

RIP, Ed Gale, the actor who played Chucky in the “Child’s Play” movies, among many other roles.

“A breakthrough by a startup backed by two of the world’s biggest mining companies points to a different path to obtaining the metals needed for manufacturing next-generation energy and defense technologies: Microbes.”

“The Trump administration would be getting slapped down in court even if the president and his minions didn’t constantly announce their intent to violate the law. But their incessant chest thumping does make things go a lot faster.”

“But the thing about the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party being in charge is that leopards are eating people’s faces and that’s horrifying and bad. That means we have to save as many people from the leopards as we can — regardless of who they are. And tend to the wounded without condition.”

RIP, Harrison Ruffin Tyler, the last living grandson of John Tyler, the 10th President of the United States. John Tyler was born in 1790. I feel a little less old right now.

“7 of Elon Musk’s worst co-president moments as he exits White House”.

“As always, an unbreakable rule of any type of baseball analysis is, if Babe Ruth was the best at something, and now your name is ahead of his, then you’re doing something extremely right.”

RIP, Loretta Swit, two-time Emmy-winning actor best known as Major Margaret “Hot Lips” Houlihan on M*A*S*H.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 1 Comment

Yes, the omnibus voter suppression law suppressed voting by mail

Cause, meet effect.

Some county election officials across Texas say the number of people voting by mail has dropped since 2020, but they’re not sure why.

New research suggests that the recent overhaul of state election laws could explain some of the drop.

A study from the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School looked at Texas voters whose mail ballots or applications to vote by mail were rejected in the 2022 primary, after the state enacted new identification requirements for mail ballots, among other changes. Many of those voters, the study found, appear to have switched to other voting methods or, in some cases, stopped voting.

The study found that 30,000 voters in that primary — or 1 out of 7 voters who started the process to vote by mail — had either their application or ballot rejected, and that “roughly 90% of these individuals did not find another way to participate in the 2022 primary.”

The authors said their findings show the potentially lasting effects of restrictive voting policies on even the most engaged voters.

About 85% of voters whose applications or ballots were rejected had voted in general elections in 2016, 2018, and 2020, said co-author Kevin Morris, a senior research fellow and voting policy scholar with the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program.

“This is a group of people that are super highly engaged in the political process,” Morris told Votebeat. “They have a long history and habit of voting, so to see these effects among them is a big deal.”

The peer-reviewed study, co-authored with political scientists from Barnard College and Tennessee State University, is set to be published later this year in the Journal of Politics and was shared with Votebeat.

[…]

In 2021, state lawmakers tightened the restrictions as part of an election law overhaul called Senate Bill 1. The legislation required voters to write their driver’s license or personal identification number, or the last four digits of their Social Security number, on the mail ballot application or mail ballot envelope — whichever number they originally used to register. If the ID number was missing or didn’t match the number on file, the application or ballot could be rejected.

The March 2022 primary, the first statewide election after the legislation took effect, saw a dramatic increase in rejection rates: 12,000 absentee ballot applications and more than 24,000 mail ballots were rejected, amounting to a 12% rejection rate statewide, far higher than in previous years. In the 2020 presidential election, by comparison, the rejection rate was 1%.

Mail-voting applications and ballots of Asian, Latino, and Black Texans were rejected at much higher rates than those of white voters after the ID requirement was added, according to an earlier study by the Brennan Center.

For the more recent study, researchers obtained individual-level data on mail-voting ballot applications and mail ballots in the 2022 Texas primary from litigation documents and public-records requests to the Texas Secretary of State. They looked at the demographics and the voting history of the roughly 215,000 Texans who requested a mail ballot for that primary, and drilled down to the 30,000 voters who had either their application or ballot rejected.

More than 3,000 voters whose mail-voting applications were rejected voted in person instead in the 2022 primary.

Out of the more than 18,000 voters whose mail ballots were rejected, only 344 voted in person. The others did not ultimately vote in the primary.

The study said the rejections increased what it called the “cost of voting,” because voters had to “try to sort out why their mail ballot did not arrive, re-apply for an absentee ballot, and seek out details about where to vote in-person.”

“I can’t speak to any law other than SB 1,” Morris said, “but this does provide some evidence that the effect of being disenfranchised does make people even less likely to vote into the future.”

All of this sounds very familiar, and I’m glad someone did the work of pulling together the voter data and digging in to see what happened. This was always something that could be done, it just needed someone with the time and the resources to do it. The March 2022 primary was the low point, as most people were experiencing the new law for the first time and county election offices were seeing the effect. Since then, campaigns and parties and election offices have done a lot of outreach and education, and election offices have made design changes in the packages they send to voters to clarify what information is needed and where it goes, all of which have drastically reduced the rejection rate. But mail ballots being cast are still down, in part due to the poison Trump and Republicans have injected about them and in part because some people don’t like or trust using them any more. At every step of the way, over at least the past two decades, Republicans have worked to make it harder to vote. Voters and campaigns have adjusted again and again, but the cumulative effect keeps increasing. You know the drill – nothing will change until we change who we elect.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Yes, the omnibus voter suppression law suppressed voting by mail

Two former Paxton lieutenants sued for sexual harassment

Damn.

Still a crook any way you look

Two of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s top deputies were forced to resign in 2023 over allegations of harassment, according to court filings included in a lawsuit Tuesday.

Judd Stone, the former solicitor general, and Chris Hilton, an assistant attorney general, were sued in federal court by Jordan Eskew, another former employee of the attorney general’s office. Eskew alleges that she was subjected to sexual harassment by Stone, and that Hilton verbally berated her and took no action to protect her from Stone’s inappropriate comments. The harassment took place, she said, while the three were on leave from the state agency to work on Paxton’s defense team during his 2023 impeachment trial.

“State law requires that the OAG and managers immediately take action to stop sexual harassment,” First Assistant Attorney General Brent Webster wrote to another agency employee in December 2024, in an email that was included in the lawsuit. “Judd and Chris would be notified that they would be terminated if they did not resign.”

Stone and Hilton, through a spokesperson, said they left the attorney general’s office voluntarily because Webster was a “petty tyrant.”

“Brent Webster has a personal vendetta against Mr. Hilton and Mr. Stone,” said a spokesperson for their law firm, Stone Hilton. “This lawsuit is his creation and a complete fabrication.

The attorney general’s office in 2023 confirmed their exits, but did not give reason for their resignations.

[…]

After Paxton was acquitted by the Senate in September 2023, Stone, Hilton, Eskew and other employees who took leave to defend him returned to the attorney general’s office.

According to Webster’s email, which Eskew’s lawyer included in the complaint, two women who worked with Stone and Hilton during the impeachment in October separately reported “credible complaints of sexual misconduct.”

I skipped the details that were given of the allegations because they’re rough; click carefully on the story for that. Texas Lawyer has some details that are a bit less rough.

Eskew worked for Stone Hilton as an executive assistant during Paxton’s impeachment trial. After returning to the Texas Attorney General’s Office in 2023, Eskew reported alleged sexual harassment and inappropriate conduct by Stone and Hilton to Brent Webster, the first assistant to Texas Attorney General Paxton. In her lawsuit, she alleges this report led to both Stone’s and Hilton’s resignation.

Prior to working for Stone Hilton, Eskew had worked with attorneys Hilton and Stone at the Attorney General’s office. At that time, Hilton was the chief of the General Litigation Division and Stone was the Solicitor General. They all left the AG’s office to work at Stone Hilton, a newly created firm focused on helping Paxton during his impeachment trial.

[…]

Eskew claims she was subjected to sexual harassment and inappropriate comments by Stone, with Hilton failing to intervene. She also alleges that Stone and Hilton engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct, including verbal abuse, harassment and inappropriate comments, resulting in a toxic workplace culture and causing her severe emotional distress, according to the lawsuit.

Eskew reported several alleged incidents of harassment during her employment at Stone Hilton, including during a lunch outing on June 16, 2023, when Stone allegedly made a sexual remark to her, stating, “I highly doubt that is the most disgusting thing that has ever been in your mouth,” after she expressed distaste for a drink, according to the lawsuit. Eskew alleges Hilton witnessed the incident but did nothing to intervene.

Another alleged incident that contributed to Eskew’s emotional distress included inappropriate comments when Stone allegedly made offensive remarks, such as a sexual comment during a lunch outing and calling Eskew “white trash” because of her turquoise earrings. Hilton again allegedly failed to intervene in these situations, according to the lawsuit.

In addition, Eskew claims she was subjected to yelling and berating by Stone and Hilton, including being told to “cry” after being verbally abused for delays in delivering lunch, according to the lawsuit.

And, according to the lawsuit, Stone made inappropriate comments, such as stating, “In this firm, there are no rules. You can say whatever slurs you want,” and asking Eskew to make him alcoholic drinks at the office.

Eskew also claims she observed Stone and Hilton drinking alcohol during work hours and was asked to purchase alcohol as part of her job duties.

Sounds like a great place to work. The most likely outcome here is some hush-hush settlement, but who knows, maybe this will advance to the point where more details will be made public. In the meantime, add this to the “In addition to everything else, Ken Paxton is a bad boss” files.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Two former Paxton lieutenants sued for sexual harassment

MLB buys equity stake in pro softball league

Cool.

Major League Baseball is purchasing an equity stake in the Athletes Unlimited Softball League, partnering with the fledgling league that is preparing for its first four-team season and plans to expand in future years.

With women’s sports revenues now in excess of $1 billion per year, the imprimatur of MLB helps establish the AUSL as a viable long-term entity in a sport that has seen multiple professional leagues fold. MLB’s stake in the AUSL is more than 20%, a source told ESPN, and the league will assist the AUSL in marketing and content distribution in addition to the financial component.

“It’s a watershed moment for pro women’s softball, pro women’s sports,” Athletes Unlimited CEO and co-founder Jon Patricof told ESPN. “This is a financial investment but also about a number of things that money can’t buy.”

While the NBA launched the WNBA in 1996 and owns around 60% of the league, no major men’s North American professional sports league had made a significant post-creation investment in its women’s counterpart. The AUSL is owned by Athletes Unlimited, which also runs women’s basketball and volleyball leagues and has hosted softball events for the past five years in suburban Chicago. The AUSL will feature four teams and play in 12 locations this summer, and in 2026, it plans to establish teams based in cities.

“We think the time is right to get into the space with a credible partner,” said Tony Reagins, MLB’s chief baseball development officer. “We want this to be not good but great. We want to create more opportunities for young women. Now they have something to strive for that’s going to be around.”

The AUSL has a deal with ESPN to broadcast 33 games this summer, and the partnership with MLB will air games on MLB Network — including one on June 7, the league’s opening day — and MLB.tv. All 72 AUSL games, Patricof said, will be on linear TV. Additionally, AUSL players will attend MLB’s All-Star Game and postseason to help grow awareness about women’s professional softball.

In 2002, MLB partnered with National Pro Fastpitch — a league that existed for 18 years with limited media distribution — but did not make a significant investment as it has with the AUSL.

“Obviously they believe in the opportunity that exists in the business of women’s sports,” Patricof said. “But also obviously see how important it is to support the sport at all levels. Hopefully, at some point, the AUSL can benefit MLB, but in the short term, it’s very much about how MLB can benefit pro women’s softball.”

See here and here for the background. I hope the AUSL players do more than show up and get shown off during All Star week, I hope they arrange to play a league game, or at least a serious exhibition game. Why not take advantage of that opportunity? Be that as it may, MLB’s involvement is a good sign for the league’s future. It hopefully means better things than what National Pro Fastpitch (which by the way had a Houston-ish team at one point) got; I think one can safely argue that National Pro Fastpitch was ahead of its time. Anyway, this is exciting and I’ll try to catch the opening day game on the MLB network. MLB’s press release is here, while Hannah Keyser discusses the softball versus baseball question – there’s a Women’s Professional Baseball League set to debut next year, too – and reminds us that the Women’s College World Series is going on now. USA Today has more.

Posted in Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on MLB buys equity stake in pro softball league

Measles update: Never forget who RFK Jr is

He’s a liar.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says his “Make America Healthy Again” Commission report harnesses “gold-standard” science, citing more than 500 studies and other sources to back up its claims. Those citations, though, are rife with errors, from broken links to misstated conclusions.

Seven of the cited sources don’t appear to exist at all.

Epidemiologist Katherine Keyes is listed in the MAHA report as the first author of a study on anxiety in adolescents. When NOTUS reached out to her this week, she was surprised to hear of the citation. She does study mental health and substance use, she said. But she didn’t write the paper listed.

“The paper cited is not a real paper that I or my colleagues were involved with,” Keyes told NOTUS via email. “We’ve certainly done research on this topic, but did not publish a paper in JAMA Pediatrics on this topic with that co-author group, or with that title.”

It’s not clear that anyone wrote the study cited in the MAHA report. The citation refers to a study titled, “Changes in mental health and substance abuse among US adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic,” along with a nonfunctional link to the study’s digital object identifier. While the citation claims that the study appeared in the 12th issue of the 176th edition of the journal JAMA Pediatrics, that issue didn’t include a study with that title.

As the Trump administration cuts research funding for federal health agencies and academic institutions and rejects the scientific consensus on issues like vaccines and gender-affirming care, the issues with its much-heralded MAHA report could indicate lessening concern for scientific accuracy at the highest levels of the federal government.

The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to a request for comment on the report’s citation inconsistencies prior to publication of this story.

The anxiety study wasn’t the only one the report cites that appears to be mysteriously absent from the scientific literature. A section describing the “corporate capture of media” highlights two studies that it says are “broadly illustrative” of how a rise in direct-to-consumer drug advertisements has led to more prescriptions being written for ADHD medications and antidepressants for kids.

The catch? Neither of those studies is anywhere to be found. Here are the two citations:

Shah, M. B., et al. (2008). Direct-to-consumer advertising and the rise in ADHD medication use among children. Pediatrics, 122(5), e1055- e1060.

Findling, R. L., et al. (2009). Direct-to-consumer advertising of psychotropic medications for youth: A growing concern. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 19(5), 487-492.

Those articles don’t appear in the table of contents for the journals listed in their citations. A spokesperson for Virginia Commonwealth University, where psychiatric researcher Robert L. Findling currently teaches, confirmed to NOTUS that he never authored such an article. The author of the first study doesn’t appear to be a real ADHD researcher at all — at least, not one with a Google Scholar profile.

In another section titled, “American Children are on Too Much Medicine – A Recent and Emerging Crisis,” the report claims that 25% to 40% of mild cases of asthma are overprescribed. But searching Google for the exact title of the paper it cites to back up that figure — “Overprescribing of oral corticosteroids for children with asthma” — leads to only one result: the MAHA report.

The corticosteroids study’s supposed first author, pediatric pulmonologist Harold J. Farber, denied writing it or ever working with the other listed authors. He pointed to similar research he’s conducted, but said that even if the MAHA report cited that study correctly, its conclusions are “clearly an overgeneralization” of the findings.

“It is a tremendous leap of faith to generalize from a study in one Medicaid managed care program in Texas using 2011 to 2015 data to national care patterns in 2025,” Farber said in an email.

There’s more than that, from sloppiness to misstating conclusions and more. The story has an update at the end that the MAHA report was amended after their reporting to remove the seven references to reports that do not exist. Mistakes happen, and usually as long as they get fixed when they’re noticed it’s not a problem. This level of error suggests much bigger issues; former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra called bullshit on the whole thing. Even if you could credibly assign it all to massive incompetence, it’s a terrible look for the agency and the authors of that report. And of RFK Jr, whose name is on it.

But as always, the chaos is the point.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stunned federal health officials on Tuesday by abruptly announcing that the COVID-19 vaccine would no longer be recommended for children and healthy pregnant women—a major policy reversal reportedly made without input from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

According to The Washington Post, agency officials were left scrambling after Kennedy dropped the news, not in a press release or internal memo, but in a video posted to X. That’s how CDC staff—and the rest of the country—found out.

This is literal life-and-death policy, yet Kennedy is treating it like a social media stunt.

Five hours after the video dropped, CDC officials finally received a one-page “secretarial directive” dated May 19—nearly a week earlier. It was signed by Kennedy but contradicted parts of his own video, deepening the confusion, according to multiple federal health officials who spoke to the Post anonymously.

In the video, Kennedy suggested he had unilaterally reversed CDC guidance recommending annual COVID shots for everyone six months and older, including healthy pregnant women. CDC officials told the Post that they learned about this “when it was tweeted.”

“People were scrambling to find out what it meant,” one federal health official said.

Kennedy also claimed the recommendations had already been pulled from the CDC website when they hadn’t. And how could they have been? Top CDC officials said they were blindsided, which is galling considering it’s the CDC’s job to issue that kind of advice in the first place.

As of Thursday, the CDC still recommended the COVID-19 vaccination for everyone six months and older, including people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to conceive, or planning to get pregnant.

The directive, meanwhile, shared internally only after the fact, ordered the CDC to remove the COVID-19 vaccines from both the child and adolescent immunization schedule and the list of recommended vaccines during pregnancy. But its vague wording raised even more questions: Did Kennedy’s directive apply to all children, or just “healthy” ones?

“It’s unclear,” one official told the Post.

Adding to the disconnect, top officials at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had just published a piece in the New England Journal of Medicine affirming that pregnancy is a high-risk condition for COVID-19 and a reason to get vaccinated, directly contradicting Kennedy’s claim.

The lying and misinformation go hand in hand with the chaos. And the bottom line is we’re all at greater risk because of RFK Jr.

The federal government announced Wednesday that it is canceling a contract to develop a vaccine to protect people against flu viruses that could cause pandemics, including the bird flu virus that’s been spreading among dairy cows in the U.S., citing concerns about the safety of the mRNA technology being used.

The Department of Health and Human Services said it is terminating a $766 million contract with the vaccine company Moderna to develop an mRNA vaccine to protect people against flu strains with pandemic potential, including the H5N1 bird flu virus that’s been raising fears.

[…]

Jennifer Nuzzo, the director of Brown University’s Pandemic Center, said the decision was “disappointing, but unsurprising given the politically-motivated, evidence-free rhetoric that tries to paint mRNA vaccines as being dangerous.”

“While there are other means of making flu vaccines in a pandemic, they are slower and some rely on eggs, which may be in short supply,” Nuzzo added in an email. “What we learned clearly during the last influenza pandemic is there are only a few companies in the world that make flu vaccines, which means in a pandemic there won’t be enough to go around. If the U.S. wants to make sure it can get enough vaccines for every American who wants them during a pandemic, it should invest in multiple types of vaccines instead of putting all of our eggs in one basket.”

The cancellation comes even though Moderna says a study involving 300 healthy adults had produced “positive interim” results and the company “had previously expected to advance the program to late-stage development.”

“While the termination of funding from HHS adds uncertainty, we are pleased by the robust immune response and safety profile observed in this interim analysis of the Phase 1/2 study of our H5 avian flu vaccine and we will explore alternative paths forward for the program,” Stéphane Bancel, Moderna’s chief executive officer, said in a statement. “These clinical data in pandemic influenza underscore the critical role mRNA technology has played as a countermeasure to emerging health threats.”

The administration’s move drew sharp criticism from outside experts.

“This decision puts the lives and health of the American people at risk,” said Dr. Ashish Jha, the dean of the Brown School of Public Health, who served as President Biden’s COVID-19 response coordinator.

“Bird Flu is a well known threat and the virus has continued to evolve. If the virus develops the ability to spread from person to person, we could see a large number of people get sick and die from this infection,” Jha said. “The program to develop the next generation of vaccines was essential to protecting Americans. The attack by the Administration on the mRNA vaccine platform is absurd.”

But totally on brand. And sooner or later there’s going to be a big mess to clean up. If it happens on RFK Jr’s watch, how much do you trust him to be able to handle it? Your Local Epidemiologist has some thoughts.

And finally, here’s your case count update.

The measles outbreak in Texas has grown by nine cases since the last update Tuesday, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services.

This brings the total new cases in the last week to 10 after one was reported Tuesday. The Texas health department estimates that less than 1% of the cases, or fewer than 10, are actively infectious. Measles is infectious four days prior to and four days after rash onset.

Since the outbreak began in January in Gaines County, located in West Texas along the state border with New Mexico, 738 cases of measles have been confirmed. Two school-age children, who were not vaccinated, have died during the outbreak. Ninety-four people have been hospitalized.

With 409 cases, Gaines County represents the vast majority of cases in the outbreak at 55.4%. Other counties with high case counts include Terry County, which neighbors Gaines, with 60 cases, and El Paso County with 57 cases. Lubbock County has 53 cases. Officials said the counties with ongoing measles transmission include Cochran, Dawson, Gaines, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

Another 32 cases have been reported that are not connected to the West Texas outbreak. This includes four cases in Tarrant County, two in Denton County, two in Collin County and one in Rockwall County.

Health officials earlier this week warned residents of measles exposure at four public venues in McKinney: a 24 Hour Fitness, the Cubana Grille, Market Street and the Moviehouse & Eatery.

Most of the confirmed cases have been children, according to DSHS. Children age 17 and under represented 495 cases, while children 4 and under represented 215 cases.

About 700 of the patients have been either unvaccinated or had an unknown vaccination status.

Ten cases a week continues to be the new normal. We also continue to get new reports of exposure in various public places, though so far none of them seem to have turned into super spreader events. I hope that luck keeps on holding up.

UPDATE: Slightly good news, but the chaos and uncertainty persists.

Days after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that Covid shots would be removed from the federal immunization schedule for children, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued updated advice that largely countered Mr. Kennedy’s new policy.

The agency kept Covid shots on the schedule for healthy children 6 months to 17 years old, but added a new condition. Children and their caregivers will be able to get the vaccines in consultation with a doctor or provider, which the agency calls “shared decision-making.”

The shots will also remain available under those terms to about 38 million low-income children who rely on the Vaccines for Children program, according to an emailed update from the C.D.C. on Friday.

Mr. Kennedy’s original pronouncement on Tuesday had caused an uproar among pediatricians and public health experts, who pointed out that very young children and pregnant women face high risks of severe illness from the virus. Many also worried that the new policy would prompt insurers and government programs to reduce or drop coverage of the cost of the shots.

The latest changes clarify coverage for healthy children older than 6 months. But they leave those highest-risk groups — pregnant woman and young infants who are covered by immunization during pregnancy — without a formal recommendation.

[…]

The policy changes on vaccines did not end uncertainty for pregnant women.

Last week, the Food and Drug Administration cited pregnancy as a high-risk condition that would qualify a woman for a Covid vaccine, which also contradicts the decision by Mr. Kennedy to drop pregnant women from the C.D.C.’s recommendations.

The dropped guidance for pregnant women is troubling to experts who point to research showing that the risk of stillbirth, preterm birth, hospitalization and death rises if pregnant women contract Covid.

Dr. Michelle Fiscus, a pediatrician and chief medical officer with the Association of Immunization Managers, said that she had expected a modified recommendation from the C.D.C. advising pregnant women to get the vaccine

“So that’s concerning,” she said.

On the C.D.C.’s website, the section on pregnancy and the Covid vaccine continues to urge pregnant and postpartum women to get the shot. If pregnant, women are “more likely to need hospitalization, intensive care or the use of a ventilator or special equipment to breathe if you do get sick from Covid-19.”

“Severe Covid-19 illness can lead to death,” the agency warns.

Who the hell knows with these malevolent idiots?

UPDATE: Of course the use of AI may be to blame for those citations of non-existent work. Of course.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Judge approves the Whitmire drainage settlement deal

Okay then.

Mayor John Whitmire

A Harris County District Court judge on Friday approved Mayor John Whitmire’s settlement agreement with plaintiffs to phase in payments to the city’s drainage fund, his office said.

The final confirmation comes after more than a month of tension among the mayor’s office, Houston Controller Chris Hollins and drainage advocates over the settlement agreement’s effect on the city’s $7 billion budget and residents who have been waiting years for flooding relief in their neighborhoods.

[…]

In a note to City Council members Friday, Whitmire appreciated the court’s attention to the matter. His office expects Hollins to certify the budget.

“Judge (Christine) Weems’ approval of the joint request from the City and Mr. Jones and Mr. Watson allows the City to meet its obligations to Houstonians without jeopardizing parks, health, and other neighborhood-centric programs,” he wrote. “We look forward to allocating an amount of funding to streets and drainage projects across Houston enabled by the settlement agreement as endorsed by the Court.”

Hollins on Friday said the court’s settlement approval removed a “major obstacle” to adopting this year’s budget.

“It’s a step forward, but Houston still faces serious financial challenges,” Hollins wrote in a statement. “Hard truths remain, and my office will continue providing the transparency and accountability needed to move the city toward long-term stability.”

A spokesperson for West Street Recovery wrote in a statement Friday that Houstonians deserved to have their votes respected, and that the settlement agreement didn’t reflect what the voters wanted or upheld the spirit of the court’s ruling.

“There are still legal paths we can take to make sure Houstonians get the flood protection we all count on,” the statement reads. “We’ve been righting for functional infrastructure for years. Today, Houstonians are more informed, organized and energized about the city’s financial decisions than ever. This work us still going strong, and we’re not backing down.”

See here and here for the background. This whole thing has been an interesting ride, but in the end that’s a win for the Mayor. Controller Hollins has some more questions, and Council hasn’t had its chance to propose amendments and vote on the budget, so we’re not done yet. I don’t know what other legal paths West Street Recovery may have in mind, but barring any further plot twists this at least moves the budget closer to approval and makes the path smoother. We’ll see what next week brings.

Posted in Legal matters, Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Judge approves the Whitmire drainage settlement deal

The death of bad bills is always worth celebrating

Good, good, good.

A handful of bills that would have stopped local governments from enacting their transportation priorities and hamstrung local transit efforts are likely dead. The measures failed to pass before key deadlines as the legislative session draws to a close.

One controversial measure, authored by state Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Houston Republican, would have required the Harris County Toll Road Authority to divert a significant portion of its excess revenue to the City of Houston to fund police and firefighters, and require that the rest be spent exclusively on county roads.

Several Harris County officials slammed the bill as a money grab for Houston, which faces a $330 million budget deficit next year. The legislation cleared the state Senate, but failed to come up for a vote in the House.

Another proposal by Bettencourt would have barred cities from narrowing roadways to create wider sidewalks or protected lanes for bicyclists and buses, which critics said could halt projects across the state meant to address traffic congestion and promote safety. Texas leads the nation in traffic fatalities. The bill was left pending in a Senate committee.

Lawmakers also took aim at transit systems in Dallas and Austin, filing legislation that would siphon sales tax revenue from Dallas Area Rapid Transit and challenging the funding mechanism that Austin voters approved to pay for Project Connect, a public transit and light rail expansion. Both of those bills failed to make it to the floor of either chamber for a vote.

See here and here for more on the Harris County toll road robbery bill, and here for more demises to celebrate. Hey, remember when Mayor Whitmire said that his connections in Austin would help him fix the city’s problems? Where do we think that stands now? I have no idea what positive things for the city may have been accomplished this term. To be fair, some of them might have passed more or less unnoticed via the Local and Consent calendar, and just not having any new aggressively anti-city measures pass is itself a positive. But where, if anywhere, did Whitmire and his team make a difference this session? What do they think their wins were? That’s what I want to know. Lone Star Left, which has a few more to celebrate, and the Observer, which reminds us that plenty of bad bills did make it to the finish line, have more.

UPDATE: Ooh, Reform Austin has some good ones, and the best part is it was Dan Patrick’s fault they died. Dude really could use some gummies and chill out.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The death of bad bills is always worth celebrating

Storm recovery group challenges Whitmire’s drainage deal

Plot twist coming, maybe. I’m skipping the first part of this story in which we rehash the 2010 ReNew Houston vote, the ways that Houston made use of the drainage fee revenue that were later challenged in court, the court rulings and settlement deal that Mayor Whitmire made with the two named plaintiffs that allowed the city to get into compliance over a couple of years by ramping up to the full amount that the city must dedicate to drainage repair and projects.

That deal will charge a percentage of that 11.8 cents to fund the city’s drainage fund incrementally over the next few years, eventually reaching the full 11.8 cents in 2028.

Officials said that using that formula, Houston will have $490 million in its drainage fund in 2026, $525 million in 2027, $540 million in 2028 and $585 million in 2029. The agreement has since been passed by the Houston City Council and Controller Chris Hollins.

But West Street Recovery, the nonprofit that filed the brief, argued the settlement violated the will of the voters.

Its members are asking the city to honor the 11.8 cent ruling in full without delay, according to a brief filed Tuesday. They argue the settlement was reached without public input or notice to affected parties and didn’t offer stakeholders to intervene.

“The injunctive settlement violates not only the Charter but also foundational principles of judicial finality, taxpayer equity, and procedural due process,” the court filing reads. “If allowed to stand, it would set a dangerous precedent whereby final court orders may be eroded through private agreement and budgetary compromise, effectively nullifying constitutional protections and voter-enacted governance structures.”

A judge in the case has yet to approve Whitmire’s settlement agreement.

But members of West Street argue it isn’t up to the two plaintiffs and the mayor to decide how the money is paid. They believe that the voters who approved the law change should have a say.

“Year after year, the City of Houston has kicked the can down the road on drainage investment — putting our homes, health, and peace of mind at risk,” reads a May 20 statement from West Street. “The Whitmire administration has had ample time to develop a thoughtful plan to comply with the court’s order, honor the will of Houston voters and keep us safe from storms. Instead, Mayor Whitmire relied on a closed-room deal with two men in a city of millions, to subvert the will of voters and kick the can down the road on life-saving infrastructure investments.”

Ben Hirsch, West Street’s co-director of organizing, research and development, said that any argument city officials made about how the denied appeal put Houston in a financial crunch was void.

He referenced the Houston Police Department’s budget, which was increased this year by $67.2 million. That amount would cover a sizable portion of the $100 million the city would have had to shell out for streets and drainage this year.

“Maybe this settlement proposal will be approved by a judge. Maybe it won’t,” Hirsch said. “But the fact of the matter is, it hasn’t been yet. So right now, the city is proposing a budget that would break the law.”

City Attorney Arturo Michel did not immediately return a request for comment.

Alice Liu, co-director of communications and organizing with West Street, said the group’s goal was to open up conversations about the rest of the budget, which she said was being pushed through without a true opportunity for feedback.

“This is something that every person who pays taxes in Houston, every person who’s impacted by flooding, has a stake in,” she said.

See here for the most recent entry in this saga; there are further links to follow if you want. I don’t know what the legal merits are here. It struck me as reasonable at the time of the deal made by Mayor Whitmire and the named plaintiffs in the lawsuit that they could do this, but that doesn’t mean that it passes legal muster. I hope it does, because we’re surely in a deeper level of doo-doo otherwise, but you pay your money and you take your chances.

The point about the raises given to HPD is a good one, one that I’s sure the Mayor won’t like. One can certainly argue that if you can defer these payments that you’re legally obligated to make, you could also defer these payments that you chose to make. Of course it’s more nuanced than that, but at a basic level there we are. I have no idea what the judge will make of it, but waiting until we know what that is looks more and more like a sound decision.

Posted in Legal matters, Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Storm recovery group challenges Whitmire’s drainage deal

Abbott’s decision and Patrick’s tantrum

A brief roundup of some THC stories…

What will Greg Abbott do?

Gov. Greg Abbott has been tight-lipped about whether he’ll sign the bill on his desk that would ban THC in Texas. I don’t envy him. There’s really no right decision.

“This is poisonous THC. No regulations whatsoever,” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick railed about the current situation in a recent video. “No one knows what’s in it. And it’s more powerful … than what you could buy from a drug dealer on the street.”

He’s not wrong. But when it comes to THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, the principal intoxicant in cannabis, one person’s poison is another person’s antidote.

“If you take away the one thing that’s working,” retired U.S. Marine, 1st Sgt. Arthur Davis, told me Tuesday, “we’re going to start using the thing that got us all in the situation we were in – and that’s alcohol.”

Davis, a 57-year-old decorated combat veteran whose post-traumatic stress disorder led him to drug addiction, credits Harris County veterans court with helping him get clean and daily use of marijuana for helping him stay that way. He’s able to smoke at home and pop a few gummies discretely in a crowd to keep the anxiety at bay.

He knows there’s some vapes and other high potency products out there that could knock him out: “Since the nerds took over, marijuana is a whole different ball game now,” he said, referring to chemists working for profit-minded companies that have dangerously increased THC content.

But Davis says friends and veterans he has mentored are calling scared, wondering how a new law would disrupt the fragile balance they’ve found without having to use debilitating meds.

For every life endangered – every headline about a 2-year-old hospitalized for a THC overdose or a teen’s mental breakdown linked to THC – there seems to be a life saved or vastly improved.

For every parent who worries about a smoke shop’s close proximity to a school – the Houston Chronicle found 76 Houston-area campuses within 1,000 feet – there’s a smoke shop owner who worries about her close proximity to bankruptcy should Abbott sign legislation essentially dismantling Texas’ $8 billion hemp industry and its estimated 50,000 jobs. Senate Bill 3 would outlaw THC for all but approved medicinal uses and allow only the sale and consumption of non-psychoactive, non-intoxicating CBD or CBG.

No one’s sure what Abbott will do. He could sign the bill, veto it or let it become law without his signature. In the past, Abbott has signaled support of marijuana decriminalization, saying “small possession of marijuana is not the type of violation that we want to stockpile jails with.”

On Tuesday, his spokesman sent me a boilerplate statement: “Governor Abbott will thoughtfully review any legislation sent to his desk.”

That’s by Lisa Falkenberg, who’s back to being a columnist again. She gives too much weight to the anti-THC side, though you should read on for the evidence she marshals. She’s also overthinking what Abbott will do. The answer to that is that Greg Abbott will do whatever Greg Abbott thinks is best for Greg Abbott. One can reasonably make a case for or against him signing or vetoing the THC ban bill, but the reasoning behind whatever he does is as simple as that.

To be sure, there is some pressure on Abbott to veto the bill.

On just one of Abbott’s posts Wednesday on the social media site X, which was unrelated to THC, dozens of accounts responded urging him to block the ban. Prominent conservatives have also voiced deep frustration with what they see as a policy straying from the Republican party’s traditional small-government principles.

Lubbock conservative radio host Chad Hasty said Abbott risks souring a relationship with grassroots conservatives, especially veterans, that is already “touch-and-go” if he signs the ban into law.

“Limited government conservatives are very upset,” said Hasty, who has talked publicly about his father’s use of hemp, instead of opioids, to alleviate back pain. “They’re going, ‘wait a minute, this isn’t what we voted for. This is not what we wanted.’”

And the industry that has cropped up over the last five years has gone into overdrive, arguing the ban will eliminate more than 50,000 jobs — an appeal to the governor’s pro-business mindset.

One store in Leander, just outside of Austin, offered discounts this week to customers who wrote to Abbott urging a veto. And an online petition by the Texas Hemp Business Council had drawn more than 81,600 signatures Wednesday afternoon.

The coalition now pushing Abbott for a veto is similar to the group of advocates that successfully convinced Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican who Abbott has followed more than once, to veto a similar ban in the state. DeSantis argued it would “introduce dramatic disruption and harm to many small retail and manufacturing businesses in Florida” — a business argument Abbott could easily adopt.

Patrick insisted he was not worried about that and instead said he’s trying to shift the public narrative.

“I know the governor. I know where his heart is, and I know where he wants to be,” Patrick said. “I’m worried about the pressure on the media and the general public to try to keep this going in some way and bring it back or stay alive.”

[…]

But Patrick is far from where public opinion stands, said Josh Blank, a political scientist at the University of Texas at Austin’s Texas Politics Project.

In April, polling by the organization found 50% of Texas voters opposed an outright ban, while just 34% expressed support. The share who said they strongly opposed the ban was also more than double those who said they strongly supported a ban, 35%-17%.

Meanwhile, 51% of Texas voters supported legalizing at least a small amount of legal marijuana. Only 15% said it should not be legal.

“Patrick is fighting something of an uphill battle against public opinion when it comes to significantly expanding prohibitions on the availability of THC and THC-adjacent products in the state,” Blank said. “Is its signature by the governor not a sure thing? It certainly raises that question. But it’s also a reflection of the fact that Dan Patrick is trying to change the conversation.”

But while vetoing the ban would make him a hero to some, Abbott would risk openly clashing with Patrick after a session largely marked by conservative wins.

“There’s been no open warfare between the two, but this might open up a wound that could be more complicated to heal,” said University of Houston politics professor Brandon Rottinghaus. “[Abbott] would definitely ruffle Dan Patrick’s feathers, but it has been a positive and productive session for both of them.”

Plus, while the THC ban has generated passionate pleas for a veto, it doesn’t register as a top priority for most voters, Blank said. It is unlikely to register in a significant way in an election.

“This isn’t an important issue,” he said. “And even for those who it is, is it more important than immigration and border security? Is it more important than business and the economy? Is it more important than property taxes?”

I mean, that’s what we have campaigns for. Dan Patrick isn’t the only one who is allowed to try to change the conversation. I agree, marijuana decriminalization has not been a salient issue in past elections, but it’s more visible now with the THC ban, if Abbott doesn’t veto it. There’s a direct and tangible effect on many people, both those who are about to be unemployed and those who are about to be cut off from remedies for various ailments and conditions. That has a way of resetting priorities. That may still fail to outweigh the other concerns mentioned, but it’s far too soon to dismiss the idea.

And as for Danno, well, he has feelings about all this.

Texas has found a way to prohibit minors from legally buying alcohol and cigarettes without banning the products entirely.

That’s why I asked Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick on Wednesday at a press conference if there is a way he could better protect children from the dangers he says THC products pose without prohibiting every grown adult in Texas from having access to the products — as he has been pushing all session.

“What are you, crazy?” Patrick responded before the question had even fully escaped my lips.

Patrick said while it is true he has been focused on protecting kids from the proliferation of the products, he’s also dead set against adults buying them.

“We don’t want anybody buying anything off the shelf that could kill them or ruin their mental state for the rest of their lives,” Patrick said while holding a bag of THC-infused cereal bites.

Many in the THC industry would obviously dispute his characterization of the dangers the products pose. Still, Patrick continued on and pointed his finger at me and blasted me for even asking the question.

“That’s the kind of talk, the reason why we’re here: the media that would say something as stupid as that,” Patrick said.

Check out his full response on social media here.

That’s from Chron reporter Jeremy Wallace. Sounds to me like Patrick could use a couple of gummies to help calm his nerves and soothe his emotions. Or maybe he’s just too emotional to hold office like that. I agree with The Barbed Wire that he didn’t expect to face such pushback. He’s used to being obeyed and feared. Maybe not so much anymore.

I’ll give the last word to these guys:

You know what I think. Dan Patrick is the villain that was promised. The rest is up to us.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The DOGE effect on feral hogs

The hogs approve this message.

Wild hogs are exceptionally hard to kill. They can leap over fences and run 30 miles per hour on open ground, making them difficult to shoot. And they’re smart, learning to avoid traps if other members of their group have been captured.

But after three decades of watching their population numbers explode across Texas and other parts of the United States, state and federal officials believe a solution might be in sight.

Six years ago, the U.S. Department of Agriculture launched a pilot program utilizing helicopters and specially designed traps to slow the spread of wild hogs. Now a bipartisan group of senators, including U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, are pushing to take the program nationwide.

Individual farmers and state agencies have employed similar techniques for years to try and control the pigs, but not with the level of coordination and spending the federal government has brought, said John Tomecek, a wildlife professor at Texas A&M University, who conducted an assessment of the program.

“You’re trying to establish a front and move the pigs back, and in the areas where the program has been employed we’ve seen the effectiveness,” he said. “The dream is one day we push them back far enough one day they’re not a problem anymore.”

While the impact of the program is still being studied, Tomecek said in those areas where the pilot program is operating, farmers are reporting a significant increase in crop revenue, a sign the government’s methods to control the local population are working.

At a time President Donald Trump and Republicans are looking to cut federal spending, getting agreement on $75 million in new funding could prove a tough sell in Congress. But Cornyn said he was confident the support was there given the billions of dollars a year in damages the hogs cause to farms and other businesses across the country.

“The last time I checked the federal government spends about $6.7 trillion a year so this is not a big issue from that standpoint,” he said. “Given the challenges our agriculture sector has faced, it seems to me like an important thing to do.”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, led by Secretary Brooke Rollins — another Texan — declined to comment on whether it supported extending the program.

[…]

After years of watching farmers struggle to control the pig populations themselves, Congress authorized the Feral Swine Eradication and Control Pilot Program in 2018. It initially launched in select counties across eight states, including 16 counties in Texas, where the program has quickly won over farmers.

The strategy is to kill as many hogs within a given group at once, so as to limit the population’s ability to learn and evade capture. In grasslands, sharpshooters ride in specially-designed helicopters than fly at the same speed as the hogs run. And in wooded areas like East Texas, 20-foot wide traps capable of capturing up to 50 hogs at a time are used.

“They do it day in and day out, and they’re very effective at it,” said Tracy Tomascik, associate director at the Texas Farm Bureau. “For a farmer to do this on his own would be very expensive, but when you spread the cost around it’s not so bad.”

However, it’s unclear whether, what to date has been a relatively small program, would work at a larger scale.

I have of course written about feral hogs many times. I don’t recall this particular program offhand – it usually seems like it’s the Lege, or occasionally a county government, trying things to slow them down – but every little bit is needed, and this seems to have some promise, though with limitations. The “shoot them from the sky” approach is well known, mostly from helicopters but also from hot air balloons. That has always had some limitations, for obvious reasons. More recently, a toxicant called warfarin has shown some promise.

So even without this federal effort, there will be ways to try to control the hog population. I don’t know how much difference this one thing would make, but it’s surely fair to say that anything reasonably viable needs to be on the table, and Senator Cornyn is correct that the amount of money being spent is barely even a rounding error in context. That doesn’t mean anything to the DOGEbags, and the fact that the Ag Secretary couldn’t be bothered to comment doesn’t bode well. And as to the fate of this funding in the so-called Big Beautiful Bill, who knows. The hogs themselves are probably not worried.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The DOGE effect on feral hogs

Controller Hollins has some questions about the budget

This hit my inbox on Tuesday evening, so I didn’t see it in time to queue something up for yesterday.

Chris Hollins

Ahead of Wednesday’s City Council vote on the proposed Fiscal Year 2026 Budget, City Controller Chris Hollins has released a plainspoken one-page document entitled “Ten Hard Truths about Houston’s Proposed Budget.” The report cuts through political spin and lays out key facts that every Houstonian—and every member of City Council—deserves to consider before casting a vote.

“Every household knows what happens when you build a budget on shaky numbers,” said Hollins. “The city budget should be no different. This document outlines ten facts that must be considered and evaluated before the vote is made.”

While the Controller’s Office does not draft the city budget, it is responsible for reviewing, certifying, and flagging financial risks. Hollins’s goal is clear: to provide transparency and protect Houston’s financial future.

The Ten Hard Truths report highlights a range of concerns, including:
• Built-in assumptions about a property tax increase
• A 6% hike in water rates
• Unspecified “savings” with no clear plan
• Risky reliance on deficit spending to close a $107 million gap
• Unrealistic overtime projections, which contributed to a $70 million overspend last year
• Potential impacts to the city’s credit rating

The document is part of the Controller’s broader effort to ensure that Houstonians have access to real financial information—not just headlines—when it comes to how their tax dollars are spent.

“Houston deserves the truth, not spin. Our job is to break down the budget, explain what it means for you and your family, and keep this process honest and fact-based every step of the way.”

The full one-pager is available at https://www.houstontx.gov/controller/news.html

See here and here for some background. The one pager is easy to read and contains links to various sources to back up the Controller’s claims. Some of the “hard truths” are more concerning than others – the assumed property tax hike is something I think needs to happen anyway and should have happened already – but the common theme running through them is the a lack of transparency on the Mayor’s part. I haven’t read the budget myself – it’s not in my wheelhouse anyway – and Hollins has plenty of reasons to take shots at the Mayor, so we’ll see what the reaction to this is. But I think it’s fair to say that Council should ask plenty of their own questions about the budget and its claims.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Controller Hollins has some questions about the budget

Film incentive bill passes

Probably won’t be that big a deal, but we’ll see.

The Texas House gave final approval to a bill increasing the amount of money the state spends to attract film and television productions.

Senate Bill 22, filed by Houston Republican Sen. Joan Huffman, would allow the comptroller to deposit $500 million into a new Texas Moving Image Industry Incentive Fund every two years until 2035.

Eligible expenses that could be paid for by incentives would include Texas workers’ wages, meals purchased from local restaurants, and airfare on Texas-based airlines.

The actual cost of the bill was still unclear Sunday night, when the House preliminarily approved the bill. Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, who was presenting the bill in the lower chamber, suggested the cost might drop to $300 million based on discussions in committee hearings.

“It could go up to $500 million as they haven’t finalized the budget, but the $300 million is what they’re discussing,” Hunter told lawmakers.

Hunter said SB 22 does not guarantee the film incentive fund to provide $500 million, which acts as a ceiling.

“You already voted for the budget. This money was placed in the budget. That’s not this bill,” Hunter told lawmakers. “This bill provides safeguards on how Texas spends money on film.”

Chase Musslewhite, co-founder of Media for Texas, a non-profit organization dedicated to boosting the state’s film and media industry, said on Tuesday she had heard discussions about decreasing the $500 million amount. Still, as long as the bill provides more than $200 million, she said her organization is content.

[…]

Others have raised concerns about how the governor’s office will determine which productions to fund. The bill gives the governor’s office complete discretion over which projects receive grant funding. However, supporters pointed out that many of these provisions have already been in place, and the bill doesn’t stop films from being made; it just provides extra incentives.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, Texas is one of 37 states to offer a film incentive program. However, due to the uncertainty surrounding their incentive program, Texas is far behind states like New York, Georgia, and New Mexico when it comes to Westerns and other film and TV productions.

“There are tons of Texans who live in California and New York, all over the globe, who are pursuing their careers, because those opportunities weren’t here in Texas,” said Grant Wood, co-founder of Media for Texas. “We have essentially been subsidizing the workforce of these other states. It’s all about bringing that workforce home and continuing to create a more robust and diverse economy.”

Since 2007, lawmakers have funded the film incentive program at varying levels, with $50 million during one legislative session followed by $45 million the next. A then-historic $200 million came during the most recent session in 2023.

The program has boosted economic activity in Texas, producing a 469% return on investment, according to the Texas Film Commission, though economists and some House lawmakers have criticized that metric and denounced film incentives as wasteful spending.

See here for some background. You can safely disregard the wild economic activity projection by the Texas Film Commission, which is right up there with projections about how much activity a sporting event will generate. It’ll do something, just not that much. But hey, we had Matthew McConaughey and some other Texas-born stars testify before legislative committees, so as far as that went we got our money’s worth. Lone Star Left and The Barbed Wire have more.

Posted in That's our Lege, TV and movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Waymo “road trip” coming

Company’s coming.

Houstonians have the opportunity to see driverless vehicles in action. Google’s autonomous-driver sister company, Waymo, announced Tuesday that it’s initiating road trips this summer for testing and exploration in Houston, Orlando and San Antonio.

The road trip consists of about 10 vehicles driving around some Houston neighborhoods, including Midtown, Norhill and Greenway, and the Interstate 45, Interstate 10 and Interstate 69 highways. The vehicles will first be driven manually and then autonomously with a driver present behind the wheel, according to a Waymo representative.

Waymo says its goal is to test its technology in new cities and understand how Houstonians travel on the city’s roadways. Company representatives plan to meet with residents and learn their transportation needs.

In other cities, Waymo teams have worked directly with local officials and first responders. The company also meets with local organizations that focus on accessibility considerations.

The road trip will be completed by the end of summer.

This was announced on Instagram:

Waymo is now in Austin, so I suppose this could be telegraphing future expansion plans, or it could just be places there engineers wanted to visit. I assume “Norhill” means my neighborhood, so I’ll get to see more weird vehicles toodling about. I note that there are no dates specified, though this Current story says they’re arriving “this week” in San Antonio, so maybe they’re already here. I’ll keep my eyes open, and we’ll see how they do on our streets. Spectrum News has more.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Waymo “road trip” coming

Texas blog roundup for the week of May 26

The weekly Texas Progressive Alliance roundup is always human generated.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of May 26

Bill targeting abortion pills appears to be dead

Three cheers for the end of session death-by-calendar watch.

A major Texas bill that was poised to offer a blueprint for abortion restrictions has likely died in the state legislature.

Senate Bill 2880, a top priority for the state’s abortion opponents, would have targeted people who manufacture, distribute, mail or otherwise provide abortion medication in Texas. It would have enabled private citizens to sue people who distributed or provided abortion pills in Texas for a minimum of $100,000. Backers said the bill was meant to hit organizations such as Aid Access, an abortion telehealth provider that helps people in states with abortion bans who want to terminate their pregnancies.

But despite clearing key legislative hurdles — the bill passed the state’s Republican-led Senate in April and received approval from a House committee Friday evening — SB 2880 was not scheduled for a floor vote in Texas’ House of Representatives. Tuesday is the deadline for Senate bills to receive a vote in the House; the bill’s omission means it will not make it to the governor’s desk before the legislative session ends this week.

“It’s very disappointing to see that it likely won’t pass this session,” said Ashley Leenerts, legislative director of Texas Right to Life, which helped craft the bill and lobbied heavily for its passage.

SB 2880 seemed poised to pass. The bill’s Senate sponsor, Republican Bryan Hughes, chairs his chamber’s influential state affairs committee, which oversees legislation affecting state policy and government. The bill had also been reviewed and approved by staff for Gov. Greg Abbott, Leenerts said.

“This has been Texas Right to Life’s top priority since the session began,” she said. “We’re going to keep working and do our best. But it did seem like there had been support from leadership in the House, Senate and governor.”

Components of the bill could move forward as amendments to other legislation or if Abbott, who opposes abortion, calls a special legislative session this summer. But multiple activists from Texas Right to Life said they are unaware of bills that could serve as an amendment vehicle for SB 2880’s abortion medication restrictions. Abbott has also not indicated that he will summon the legislature back for a special session.

See here for some background. Greg Abbott has been quick and relentless on the special session trigger in years past, so I’m not ready to rest easy just yet. And even if this is allowed to let slide for now, you can be sure it will be back with a vengeance in 2027, assuming a continued Republican trifecta and no changes at the federal level. It’s a win and it’s important to celebrate wins, just keep some perspective.

Along those lines, the Current identified another win.

Similarly, voter-suppression measure Senate Bill 16 ran out of time to be brought to the floor for a vote. That legislation, modeled after the nationally proposed SAVE act, would have required voters to show documents proving citizenship when registering to vote, which critics argue would disenfranchise legally eligible voters who don’t have a passport or birth certificate readily available.

It’s already illegal for noncitizens to vote, but SB 16 proponents argued the new proposal would verify citizenship. However, voting-rights advocates said the bill would create significant barriers for people otherwise entitled to cast ballots. One in 10 eligible voters nationally would find it difficult to prove citizenship, according to a national survey reported on by NPR. Further, married women who changed their name after marriage would also be disenfranchised, critics argue, because their birth certificate often doesn’t match their married name.

[…]

Progressive activists celebrated the wins over the weekend, saying Democratic lawmakers slowed down the process overall so the House was only able to pass five bills Saturday.

The 89th Texas Legislative Session ends June 2, leaving just a week left to fight over bills left in committee and the Senate chamber.

“These two bills, SB 2880 and SB 16, were our biggest priorities this week and we killed them both,” progressive Texas politics Instagram account @howdypolitics posted. “That’s no small thing and we should celebrate. Especially in a state like Texas where wins feel so rare.”

The SAVE Act, at both the federal and state levels, is deeply stupid and would likely be quite harmful to a swath of Republican voters, but neither of those has ever been an impediment. Celebrate the wins indeed.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bill targeting abortion pills appears to be dead

Fair for Houston makes good on its warning

They did warn us.

Lawyers for advocacy group Fair for Houston have filed an injunction against Mayor John Whitmire and the Houston City Council after urging the city to comply with a local law to give the city more representation on the region’s transportation board.

Houston City Council voted in October to renew its membership on the Houston-Galveston Area Council, a body that’s tasked with distributing federal funds for infrastructure, climate mitigation and workforce development.

That vote came with backlash from Fair for Houston, the group that championed the charter amendment greenlit by voters in 2023 that would give more representation on the board. If that greater representation didn’t happen, city charter dictates the city would have to leave the group.

H-GAC negotiations did not result in more representation for the city, and since then, advocates with Fair for Houston have argued the council’s move to renew Houston’s membership violated the voter’s wishes to have more representation.

[…]

Michael Mortiz, one of the group’s organizers, told the Houston Chronicle Tuesday that Fair for Houston and its lawyers had received only radio silence from the city since sending its letter. City leaders have also not responded to multiple correspondences from the group’s lawyers, Mortiz said.

“Now more than ever, citizens have a responsibility to hold all levels of government accountable to both the rule of law and the will of the voters,” Mortiz wrote in a Tuesday statement. “Although we tried everything in our power to enforce Proposition B through good faith negotiations, the inaction on the part of city officials has made it clear that we must resort to the courts to compel our elected officials to do their duty.”

See here and here for the background. I’ve said before and I’ll say again, I have no idea what happens next. This has all been one giant step into the unknown, and there are some definite downside possibilities out there. On the other hand, and I’ve said this before as well, we had an election with a clear result, and that needs to mean something. Kudos to Fair for Houston for standing up for that principle. Houston Public Media, which has a copy of the lawsuit, has more.

Posted in Legal matters, Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The case against rooting for Tesla to fail

From Inside Climate News.

While some people may be pleased to see Tesla and Musk struggle, and most of the damage was self-inflicted, Tesla’s swoon is probably bad for the U.S. EV market.

It helps to have a sense of just how big Tesla is relative to other EV makers that sell in the United States. Last year, 48 percent of the EVs sold here were Teslas and no competitor cracked 10 percent, according to Cox Automotive.

Tesla also is a key player in building and maintaining EV charging stations. If any of the companies behind charging infrastructure run into financial problems, that could be a big concern, said Samantha Houston, a senior manager for the Clean Transportation program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“Having those publicly accessible networks be reliable, and expanding them, is an essential piece,” she said.

If Tesla or other charging companies scale back their efforts, it would be an impediment to increasing EV ownership for all brands. This is especially true now that most automakers have adopted Tesla’s North American Charging Standard, which means Tesla charging stations can be used by people driving other brands, Houston said.

In addition to practical issues such as charging, Tesla’s struggles could fuel a perception problem for EVs.

“I don’t think it’s good for the EV market to have Tesla seen in a negative light—imploding,” said William Roberts, senior research analyst for Rho Motion, the United Kingdom-based research firm that covers batteries and EVs.

He explained that Tesla is synonymous with EVs, especially for consumers in the United States. For Tesla to be viewed as an object of derision is not helpful for easing the concerns of potential buyers, especially those who are deciding between an EV and a gasoline vehicle.

At the same time, sales figures show that other automakers were able to increase their EV sales to offset Tesla’s decline, and then some. Tesla’s U.S. sales were down 5.6 percent last year compared to 2023, while overall EV sales in the nation—which includes Tesla—were up by 7.3 percent, according to Cox.

Through the first two months of 2025, Tesla sales were down, especially in Europe and China, but global EV sales were way up, according to Rho Motion. Global sales were up 30 percent, including an increase of 35 percent in China and 20 percent in Europe and the United States/Canada. (Rho Motion includes plug-in hybrids in its totals, while Cox doesn’t.)

I just don’t see the EV sales surge as a reason to think that the market is shaking off Tesla’s problems. The reason is simple: We don’t know what sales would have been with a strong Tesla.

In sports terms, a star player is limping. That’s almost never good for the game.

That’s the back half of the article; the first half recounts all the ways in which Tesla has been battered and some dire predictions for its future. The news keeps getting worse since then. You’d likely enjoy reading that, so click over and check it out. I say buy electric, just not a Tesla. If at some point the Tesla board dumps Emlo, we can re-evaluate. But for now, to me the choice is clear.

Posted in National news, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

So about that Compassionate Use program…

Psyche!

A plan to expand Texas’ struggling medical marijuana program has been stripped down by a state Senate committee, just days after the House agreed to the upper chamber’s plan to ban all recreational THC.

New draft language for House Bill 46, which overhauls the Texas Compassionate Use Program, significantly reduces the bill’s expansion framework, limiting licenses and striking provisions that would create eligibility for chronic pain, traumatic brain injury and other conditions not currently covered by the program.

The move, which still needs approval by the full Senate, is likely to anger some House lawmakers, who agreed to pass the hemp THC ban with assurances from proponents that veterans and other people with serious medical needs would have better access under the medical cannabis program expansion.

Both the chronic pain and TBI conditions had been specifically championed by veterans’ groups who say they want greater access to the program to provide opioid alternatives. The rewrite also specifically removes provisions in the House version guaranteeing broad eligibility for veterans and the confidentiality of their prescriptions.

The exact draft language was not immediately made public, but was approved by members of the Senate State Affairs committee in an informal hearing Friday night. It will now face a floor vote in the GOP-led Senate.

State Rep. Tom Oliverson, a Cypress Republican, vowed to lobby for the medical marijuana expansion while pushing for the THC ban during floor debate this week. Both chambers will need to agree on a final version of the expansion before it can head to Gov. Greg Abbott to be signed into law.

“I know chronic pain is important. [We] fought for that in the TCUP as we passed that bill out of the House,” Oliverson said. “You better believe I’m going to fight for that on the other side, because I think it is of critical importance. I don’t ever want someone to be denied access to a medication that may be of benefit.”

The new draft language, however, strikes the chronic pain eligibility and also reduces the number of new business licenses for medical cannabis companies from nine to three.

See here and here for the background. The lessons here are clear: You can’t trust Dan Patrick, and if you ever want to make access easier to any kind of cannabis or marijuana products in Texas, you have to vote him out as a starting point. The question to me is whether the advocates for expanded cannabis and marijuana will continually ignore and deny these lessons as the advocate for expanded gambling have done, or if they will wise up and take appropriate action. The first opportunity to do that is next year. The Quorum Report has more.

UPDATE: After backlash from House Republicans, Patrick has backed off a little.

State lawmakers announced a deal on Sunday to make Texans with chronic pain eligible for medical marijuana prescriptions, reversing a previous decision that could have limited access to a large swath of veterans.

The agreement came after several Republican House members protested the Senate’s move to gut the planned expansion of the medicinal cannabis program, known as the Texas Compassionate Use Program. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who voiced objections to adding more qualifying conditions as recently as Saturday, announced the new agreement on social media.

[…]

Patrick has long resisted adding chronic pain to the list of eligible conditions since the program’s start in 2015. Veterans’ groups have championed the addition and estimate more than a quarter of all veterans could qualify.

According to a post from state Rep. Tom Oliverson, R-Cypress, Patrick also agreed to reverse a decision to drop the number of business licenses allowed under the program from twelve to three. The deal does not appear to add back other conditions that a key Senate committee stripped out of the bill on Saturday, including traumatic brain injury, glaucoma, spinal neuropathy, Crohn’s disease and degenerative disc disease. It is also not clear if the agreement would reinstate a stripped provision designed to help veterans keep their information within the program confidential.

Patrick did not explain what led to the change of course.

Because he recognized that he went too far and for once felt the need to do something about it. Dan Patrick is about what Dan Patrick wants. He’ll be back to look for another way to tighten this up next session if we leave him in power.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

We need a better class of wingnut billionaire overlords

I read this story about the latest dude in politics with more money than sense and I just shake my head.

In mid-September, Alex Fairly accepted an invitation to spend the day with one of the state’s richest and most powerful political megadonors.

He jumped in his private plane and flew down to meet Tim Dunn, a West Texas oil billionaire, at his political headquarters located outside of Fort Worth.

For five hours, Dunn and his advisers walked Fairly through the network of consulting, fundraising and campaign operations they have long used to boost Texas’ most conservative candidates, target those who they deem too centrist and incrementally push the Legislature toward their hardline views.

The two men talked about political philosophy and strategy. They discussed the Bible at length. Fairly was impressed, he said, if not surprised by the sheer magnitude of Dunn’s “political machine.”

“I think most people underestimate how substantial and how many pieces there are that fit together and how coordinated they are,” Fairly said in an interview with The Texas Tribune.

Dunn ended the tour with an ask: Would Fairly be willing to partner with him?

It was a stunning sign of how suddenly Fairly had emerged as a new power broker in Texas politics. Three years ago, few outside Amarillo had heard the name Alex Fairly. Now, the Panhandle businessman was being offered the chance to team up with one of the most feared and influential conservative figures at the Capitol.

Over the past year, Fairly had also poured millions into attempts to unseat GOP lawmakers deemed not conservative enough and install new hardliners. He sought to influence the race for House speaker and rolled out a $20 million political action committee that pledged to “expand a true Republican majority” in the House.

He had chosen a side in the raging civil war between establishment Republicans and far-right conservatives — and it was the same side as Dunn. Seemingly out of nowhere, he had become the state’s 10th largest single contributor for all 2024 legislative races, even when stacked against giving from PACs, according to an analysis by the Tribune.

But after mulling it over, Fairly turned down Dunn’s offer. It wasn’t the right time, he said.

And a few months later, Fairly began to question whether it would ever be the right time. Ahead of the 2025 legislative session — where his daughter Caroline would be serving her first term — Fairly dove deeper into the dramatic House leadership election, aiding efforts to push out old guard Republican leadership whom he believed were making deals with Democrats at the expense of conservative progress.

But the more he dug, the more he didn’t like what he saw: dishonest political ads, bigoted character assassinations and pressure campaigns threatening lawmakers over their votes. Fairly eventually realized much of what he thought he knew about Texas Republican politics was wrong.

He said he’d been misled by people in Dunn’s orbit to believe House Speaker Dustin Burrows was a secret liberal. Those misconceptions informed his efforts to try to block the Lubbock Republican from winning the gavel.

“I thought it was all true,” he said. “I didn’t know Burrows one bit. I just was kind of following along that he was the next bad guy. And it wasn’t until, frankly, other things happened after that that I started just asking my own questions, getting my own answers.”

As Fairly’s perspective shifted, he said he felt a moral obligation to correct course — and to try to get others, like Dunn, to change their behavior, too.

His political awakening could have seismic implications for Texas politics. Just last year, he seemed positioned as a second Dunn-like figure who could add pressure and funding to the effort to push the Legislature further right. Even now, he still supports many of those same candidates and concepts in principle. But he has come to condemn many of the methods used to achieve those goals by Dunn and his allies. Dunn did not respond to a request for an interview or written questions.

“When we spend time attacking each other and undermining each other in public and berating people’s character — particularly if it has a slant that isn’t completely honest and truthful — I think we are just eating each other,” Fairly said. “At some point you began to do more harm than you’re doing good.”

It’s a long story, so read the rest. And keep any hope you might have that he’ll Find The Light somehow and become an actual force for good – he’s still a rich conservative guy whose daughter is a new Republican State Rep, he’s just one with something a bit more akin to a conscience than the true nihilists – to a minimum. At best, maybe he’ll support conservative candidates who want to get stuff done instead of burning it all down, which is a double-edged sword to say the least. I don’t have any good ideas about what could be done in the short to medium term about the increasing number of billionaire overlords. If we can win enough power, there are things we can do. It’s that first step that’s the hard part.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

What’s next for Aurora’s driverless trucks

Expansion coming soon.

Autonomous vehicle technology company Aurora Innovation plans to expand on the success of its first driverless commercial launch and add night driving to its operations.

Aurora said Thursday that in the second half of 2025, it will start sending its self-driving trucks out at night and during adverse weather conditions like rain or heavy wind. The company, which provided the update in its first-quarter shareholder letter, also plans to expand its driverless trucking route beyond Dallas to Houston, and into El Paso and Phoenix.

“We’d like to have a high return on asset for every truck that we have, and so we’ll try to drive efficiency to get as many miles on as many trucks as fast as possible,” Aurora CFO Dave Maday said Thursday during the company’s first-quarter earnings call. “We should be able to double our drive time as soon as we unlock night. And that’s our next key milestone.”

Aurora already runs freight with self-driving trucks in those conditions, but with a human safety operator behind the wheel. The company said it has completed more than 4,000 miles in a single self-driving truck without a driver running freight for its launch customers Hirschbach Motor Lines and Uber Freight.

In the week since Aurora’s commercial launch, the company has already expanded to two driverless trucks operating on a daily basis and says it expects to operate “tens of trucks” by the end of 2025.

See here and here for some background. I have to say, I guess I had assumed that this was an actual fleet, not just one and now two trucks doing all the work. The promise that there will be “tens of trucks” by the end of the year just struck me as having big Tobias Funke energy, which gave me the kind of laugh we all need these days.

Anyway. I don’t mean to mock, this is quite an accomplishment, even if it’s at a smaller scale than I had been envisioning. The mentions of El Paso and Phoenix no doubt mean that I-10, and probably I-20 if they’re going to and from Dallas, will be added to the route list. More opportunities to see them for yourself, if you happen to be on the right patch of road at the right time.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What’s next for Aurora’s driverless trucks

THC retailers upset by THC ban

What are y’all going to do about it?

Sydney Torabi, co-founder of Austin-based Restart CBD, could only watch in disbelief late Wednesday night as the Texas House delivered a key vote to push through a ban on all products containing THC, essentially stripping her of a significant piece of her livelihood by this fall.

“My jaw dropped. I didn’t understand the outcome,” said Torabi, who started her business with her sister seven years ago.

Senate Bill 3 by Sen. Charles Perry, a Lubbock Republican who also carried the 2019 hemp legalization bill that created the THC proliferation, would penalize violators who knowingly possess hemp products with any amount of THC with a misdemeanor that can carry up to a year in jail. Those who manufacture or sell these products would face up to 10 years in prison. The measure is a few procedural steps away from going to Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk.

As of April 2024, Texas had over 7,000 registered hemp sellers. The state’s hemp industry is estimated to employ more than 50,000 people and generate $7 billion in tax revenue annually, according to a study done by Whitney Economics. However, with THC-containing hemp products, like gummies, drinks, lotions, clothing, coffee, and much more, slated to be criminalized by Sept. 1, retailers are telling The Texas Tribune they plan to close shop, ship their product out in mass, or stay open and be declared a drug dealer by the state while they fight the issue in the courts.

“It’s devastating,” Torabi said, adding that she was disheartened that other bills had been held hostage until Senate Bill 3 was passed. “That is the saddest part. [Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick] used people against people and surprised everyone.”

This session, Patrick, who oversees the Senate, has led the charge to ban THC, accusing retailers of preying on susceptible minors by setting up stores near schools and marketing products to children.

“We cannot in good conscience leave Austin without banning THC, which is harming our children, and destroying Texans’ lives and families,” Patrick said in a social media post before Senate Bill 3 passed.

The GOP-controlled Legislature authorized the sale of consumable hemp a year after it was legalized nationwide to boost Texas agriculture by allowing the commercialization of hemp containing trace amounts of delta-9 THC.

What ensued was a proliferation of hemp products sold at dispensaries and convenience stores across the state.

“We are deeply disappointed by the Texas House’s passage of SB 3, a bill that dismantles the legal hemp industry and ignores the voices of small businesses, farmers, veterans and consumers across the state who rely on hemp-derived products for their livelihoods and well-being,” according to a statement from the Texas Hemp Business Council on Thursday. “We urge Governor Abbott to reject SB 3 and protect the tens of thousands of hardworking Texans.”

Hemp manufacturers and retailers had championed to House lawmakers their willingness to adopt stricter oversight and licensing requirements. Lawmakers in the lower chamber initially seemed willing to adopt regulations despite an outright ban, which makes the sequence of events this week feel like a betrayal to many business owners.

“I know there are some people in the House who care. It’s just unfortunate,” Torabi said.

[…]

Some of the most vigorous opposition to the all-out ban on hemp products has come from those who use it for medical purposes. Veterans, parents of kids with mental health or physical disabilities, and the elderly spoke to lawmakers this year about the importance of having easy access to hemp products, not the medical marijuana program.

The Legislature is considering plans to expand the state’s medical marijuana program by April 2026. Even so, some users have said they would strongly prefer to continue buying products at smoke shops, because doing so is cheaper, more accessible, and does not require an expensive and sometimes far-away visit to a medical professional.

You know what I think. There’s no way Abbott vetoes SB3, and while maybe a district court judge might impose a temporary restraining order on the law, I cannot see it ultimately prevailing. Hell, I doubt it survives the 15th Court of Appeals, and it won’t surprise me at all if the Supreme Court lifts any TROs while the case gets litigated. The many people who will be affected by this, from the retailers and their employees to the many users of their products, have two choices: Cut and run, or stay and fight. You want to get access to THC restored in Texas, it starts by voting Dan Patrick out of office. If you don’t do that, it could be many, many years before another opportunity to move the needle comes along.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on THC retailers upset by THC ban

Yes, the penny is done for

So long, old friend.

The Trump administration says making cents doesn’t make sense anymore.

The U.S. Mint has made its final order of penny blanks and plans to stop producing the coin when those run out, a Treasury Department official confirmed Thursday. This move comes as the cost of making pennies has increased markedly, by upward of 20% in 2024, according to the Treasury.

By stopping the penny’s production, the Treasury expects an immediate annual savings of $56 million in reduced material costs, according to the official, who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity to preview the news.

In February, President Donald Trump announced that he had ordered his administration to cease production of the 1-cent coin.

[…]

There are about 114 billion pennies currently in circulation in the United States — that’s $1.14 billion — but they are greatly underutilized, the Treasury says. The penny was one of the first coins made by the U.S. Mint after its establishment in 1792.

The nation’s treasury secretary has the authority to mint and issue coins “in amounts the secretary decides are necessary to meet the needs of the United States.”

Advocates for ditching the penny cite its high production cost — almost 4 cents per penny now, according to the U.S. Mint — and limited utility. Fans of the penny cite its usefulness in charity drives and relative bargain in production costs compared with the nickel, which costs almost 14 cents to mint.

[…]

Jay Zagorsky, professor of markets, public policy, and law at Boston University, said that while he supports the move to end penny production, Congress must include language in any proposed legislation to require rounding up in pricing, which will eliminate the demand for pennies.

Zagorsky, who recently published a book called “The Power of Cash: Why Using Paper Money is Good for You and Society,” said otherwise simply ditching the penny will only increase demand for nickels, which are even more expensive, at 14 cents to produce.

“If we suddenly have to produce a lot of nickels — and we lose more money on producing every nickel — eliminating the penny doesn’t make any sense.”

See here for the background, and here for my entire obsession with these dumb coins. Somehow, in all that discussion, I had either not realized or forgotten how much more expensive nickels were to mint, which makes me wonder if there will be a push to eliminate them as well. One thing I do recall is that because of sales taxes, which will take your nice divisible-by-five price and make it something that requires pennies to transact, the fear was that all final sales prices would round up as needed and thus make everything a teeny bit more expensive, which naturally would be felt the most by the poorest folks. That still seems to be inevitable, it just seems less likely that there will be any public fretting about it. Post-COVID, I seldom transact in cash anymore, but I’ll be on the lookout now for those rare times that I do for any price changes to make the loss of the penny less evident. We’ll see how long that takes.

Posted in National news | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Weekend link dump for May 25

“A chatbot developed by Elon Musk’s multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence startup xAI appeared to be suffering from a glitch Wednesday when it repeatedly brought up white genocide in South Africa in response to user queries about unrelated topics on X.”

“How Pope Leo Will Approach Climate Change Is Unclear, but the Vibe Is Positive”.

“MLB commissioner Rob Manfred’s pace of play rules have been a nearly unqualified success, the World Baseball Classic has become must-see theater under his watch and he’s making real progress toward eliminating television blackouts. But when it comes down to it, he has one job. Nothing else matters if fans don’t believe what they’re seeing on the field is real. And with Tuesday’s decision to reinstate Pete Rose, the hit king who was banned from the sport for betting on baseball as manager of the Cincinnati Reds, Manfred has ensured that his legacy as commissioner will be one of failure.”

Sesame Street has a new streaming home. Netflix has picked up the children’s series, which will make its debut on the streamer later this year with an all-new, reimagined 56th season — plus 90 hours of previous episodes — available to audiences worldwide.”

“I had an abortion in the third trimester; I don’t expect every American to have the same understanding that I do. However, I do believe that I am in line with most Americans when we agree that we do not want the state to punish people for having them.”

“International criminal groups are stealing as much as a trillion dollars a year from U.S. government programs but the Department of Government Efficiency has done little to address the problem”.

Absolutely ridiculous. An utter travesty.

“House Republicans pushed President Trump’s “big, beautiful” tax-and-spending bill past a key hurdle late Sunday night, but the last-minute grappling has them colliding with a stark reality: The plan won’t reduce federal budget deficits and would make America’s fiscal hole deeper.”

“NASA celebrated this employee’s story of resilience, then tried to scrub it from the internet. Then fired her.”

“If we have policy adjustments that disqualify people from the SNAP program, or if we have a recession and unemployment goes up, or if we have a series of natural disasters, there are any number of things that can work to increase demand, and the food banks just aren’t ready.”

“Of course a president openly filling his pockets with direct (albeit thinly veiled) payoffs from people with business before the government is an attack on the republic. Of course the president pardoning political allies for crimes is an attack on the republic. Of course disappearing people off the streets and sending them to foreign prison camps is an attack on the republic. Of course violating basic constitutional rules about spending government money; defying court orders; denying habeas rights; intimidating media outlets and universities and law firms; and on and on are all attacks on the republic.”

“Notice the clear tilt. Trump is acknowledging that Putin, not Zelensky, is the one resisting a ceasefire—yet if Russia stays on that course, the U.S. won’t step up its support for Ukraine; instead, Trump will simply pull out. Trump has said (and some analysts agree, though others do not) that without firm U.S. support, Russia will win the war. That seems fine with the American president.”

This is why appeasement doesn’t work. Don’t be a chump.

RIP, George Wendt, actor and comedian who was a six-time Emmy nominee as Norm on Cheers.

Letting caregivers get sick seems like a bad idea.

What if Jesus was Chaotic Good?”

“We’re Focused on the Wrong A.I. Problem in Journalism”.

“A group of Quakers are marching more than 300 miles from New York City to Washington, D.C., to demonstrate against the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigrants.”

“NFL films scrapped plans for a season of the documentary show “Hard Knocks” focused on former New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick over escalating conflicts with Belichick’s girlfriend Jordon Hudson”.

RIP, Kathleen Hughes, 1950s starlet best known for her iconic scream in It Came From Outer Space.

RIP, Jim Irsay, longtime owner of the Indianapolis Colts.

“HGTV Is Quietly Ditching Renovation Shows — It’s Starting to Look a Lot Like MTV”.

“A civil RICO case against the racketeer in chief should be part of any effort to save this country from Trump’s dictatorial aspirations, which are coming closer to reality every day.”

“Once again, the Freedom Caucus blinked. They are too cowardly to live up to their ideals if it means standing up to Trump, who traveled to Capitol Hill to browbeat the Freedom Caucus holdouts and rally the entire Republican Conference.”

“The Largest Upward Transfer of Wealth in American History”.

Have these idiots ever even heard of Bruce Springsteen?

“In a sense the exception of the Federal Reserve is not only a small gift, a marginal limit on the destruction, but an additional gift of giving the lie to the whole enterprise. This remains a renegade and corrupt Supreme Court majority making up its own Constitution as it goes and most times, if not every time, enabling arbitrary and untrammeled presidential dictatorship.”

Wishing Billy Joel all the best.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 2 Comments

A start-of-hurricane-season roundup

Here’s your latest forecast.

The nation’s top weather agency, where federal job cuts and staffing shortages are stretching forecast resources thin, is predicting 13 to 19 named storms in its 2025 hurricane season outlook released Thursday.

This hurricane season, which begins in less than 10 days on June 1, has a 60% likelihood of being above normal, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Of the 13 to 19 named storms, six to 10 could become hurricanes, which have maximum sustained wind speeds of at least 74 mph. Forecasters also expect three to five major hurricanes, which are hurricanes with winds of at least 111 mph (Category 3 status or higher).

Unlike previous years, NOAA scientists will be monitoring an active hurricane season with a troubling number of vacancies in critical subagencies, such as the National Hurricane Center. Houston’s regional office of the National Weather Service, one of six agencies NOAA oversees, is among the hardest hit by staffing woes with 11 vacancies, including three leadership positions.

Among the reasons for an above-normal hurricane season are the unusually warm water temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, and the expectation of a neutral sea-surface temperature pattern in the equatorial eastern Pacific. Higher ocean temperatures means tropical cyclones have more heat energy to draw from, which then allows storms to rapidly intensify.

The average sea-surface temperature in the Gulf of Mexico is running about two degrees above the climate-normal established from 1991-2020 data. This departure is so far comparable to the above-normal warmth in the Gulf leading up to the start of the active 2023 and 2024 Atlantic hurricane seasons.

This is in line with earlier predictions, so that’s nice. It’s important to remember that these are for a range of possible and likely outcomes, not an exact measure. And it only takes one hurricane in the wrong place to make it a bad season, as we all can attest from last year.

Our local leaders say they are ready for whatever comes.

FEMA funding and aid may be uncertain ahead of hurricane season, but Houston-area emergency management officials say they are prepared for the disasters and will seek assistance from the state for recovery efforts if necessary.

In January, President Donald Trump issued an executive order establishing the FEMA Review Council to determine whether the Federal Emergency Management Agency is equipped to address disasters across the United States.

Since then, Trump has made cuts to the agency. Earlier this month, the Associated Press reported that David Richardson, a former Marine Corps officer, was named acting administrator of FEMA just after Cameron Hamilton, who’d been leading the agency, was fired.

“There is obviously a lot to be figured out,” said Brad Burness, emergency management coordinator for Galveston County.

[…]

Jason Millsaps, executive director of the Montgomery County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security, said his county is ready. Millsaps said Montgomery County is one of the few counties in the state with an emergency supply warehouse.

“As we approach hurricane season, our OEM logistics team begins to stockpile supplies and prepare supplies for rapid deployment,” Millsaps said. “We are uniquely positioned to respond to any disaster.”

Millsaps said his office will work with the state for any recovery needs.

“We are confident in our planning and coordination with the state, that any needs will be addressed timely,” Millsaps said.

We are of course worried about what the federal response to a hurricane will be. Unfortunately, the only way to know for sure is to find out. It’s uncharitable to say, but I hope it’s someone else who has to do that.

CenterPoint says they’re ready.

CenterPoint Energy announced Thursday that its infrastructure is now more resilient ahead of the 2025 hurricane season, which starts June 1.

CenterPoint’s improvements, which make up the second phase of the company’s Greater Houston Resiliency Initiative, include more than 26,000 stronger poles, 6,000 miles of cleared vegetation from power lines and more than 5,000 automated reliability and grid switching devices.

The initiative started last summer following Hurricane Beryl, when CenterPoint faced major criticism from citizens and politicians for a poor response to the hurricane.

“The pain and frustration our customers felt was clear,” said CenterPoint CEO Jason Wells. “Their anger for our performance was clear, and it is a catalyst for us to change the way we build our system, we operate our system, we interact with our customers. We’ve done more work over the course of this last year than we’ve ever done in our company’s history, and we’re going to continue that pace.”

CenterPoint completed the first phase of the Greater Houston Resiliency Initiative in August. The deadline to complete the second phase, which started in September, was June 1.

[…]

CenterPoint expects the improvements will reduce annual outages by 125 million minutes.

Details about the next phase of the resiliency plan, which lasts through the end of the year, will be announced in June.

“We know that we have a long way to go to improve what our customers experienced last storm season,” said Tony Gardner, CenterPoint’s chief customer officer. “But we will not stop. We’ll continue to work around the clock to make sure that we improve things here in the Greater Houston area.”

I’m sure Whataburger can take the competition. Look, CenterPoint has invested some real money in its disaster response planning, as they definitely needed and were told to do. If they don’t level up, the response this time around will make 2024 seem like a love letter.

And finally, just because you live farther inland, don’t get overconfident.

Inland flooding is the leading cause of hurricane-related fatalities, not just in Texas but throughout the United States. According to an analysis of National Hurricane Center data, 60% of tropical cyclone-related deaths in the United States over the past decade have been attributed to rainfall flooding.

Inland residents might let their guard down, believing hurricanes are a too-distant threat. Residents in coastal communities, on the other hand, are often well-prepared for a tropical cyclone, having either evacuated or made plans to protect their property from potential flooding.

However, as the effects of climate change, including rising global air and ocean temperatures, have become more evident in the past few decades, we’ve seen tropical cyclones become stronger and occur more often. Records have been broken in the number of named storms in a single season (30 in 2020), the strength of hurricanes early in a season (Beryl was a Category 5 hurricane on July 2, 2024) and the intensity of hurricanes (Wilma in 2005 was the Atlantic’s most intense hurricane).

Because hurricanes are not just a coastal issue, and damage from wind and water can happen hundreds of miles inland regardless of the storm’s landfall strength, the National Hurricane Center is continuing to refine its forecast cone map, which depicts the probable track of a hurricane. The latest version aims to better address all hazards within the probability cone.

While the previous version focused on the storm path and the risks along the coast, the updated version now highlights areas far from the coast that could face hurricane or tropical storm conditions. After the map was used on an experimental basis last year, the hurricane center plans to make this enhanced forecast cone map an official graphic this year.

Again, we won’t know until we find out. This season could range from total disaster to “that was bad but it could have been worse” to “we got lucky this year”. May the odds be ever in our favor.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Fort Worth’s view of the HISD takeover

As recently noted, Fort Worth ISD has been notified by the Texas Education Agency that they are required to intervene in that district. While it’s not been determined yet what that means, a takeover is on the list of possibilities. As FWISD is a large urban district, the comparison to HISD and our experience with being taken over is inevitable. The Star-Telegram did some reporting, and I was interested in how they saw things. I’m skipping the beginning of their story, which recounts where FWISD is and how HISD got to where we are, and we’ll pick it up from there.

What has happened since Miles took over has been something of a mixed bag. A year into the takeover, Houston ISD’s state test scores improved, even as they declined across Texas, a fact that district leaders held up as a sign their strategy was working.

But the district has also seen widespread principal turnover, a sharp uptick in teachers leaving and big declines in enrollment, especially at schools under Miles’ school reform model. [Duncan Klussmann, a professor of school leadership in the University of Houston’s College of Education] said he knows families who have transferred their kids from Houston ISD to private schools because of the instability the district has seen since Miles took over. Last year, voters in the district roundly rejected a $4.4 billion bond proposal, which both supporters and detractors saw as a referendum on Miles’ leadership.

In a virtual town hall last week organized by the Houston Chronicle, Miles said the lesson he took from the bond issue’s failure is that a state-appointed intervention team can’t bring a bond proposal to a community. The community needs to come to district leaders with what they want to see in a bond package.

But more broadly, Miles defended his slate of reforms. The large amount of turnover among Houston ISD’s principals was driven primarily by the district making leadership changes because former principals weren’t getting results, he said. While he acknowledged that a change in principals can bring disruption, he said it was necessary to improve school performance.

Klussmann, the University of Houston professor, said it’s too early to tell how effective Miles’ reforms will be in the long term. Much of his strategy for the district is centered around getting short-term wins, like improvement on STAAR scores, he said. But other metrics like high school graduation rates, student success after graduation and college-going rates can be better indicators of how a district is actually doing, he said. Any change in strategy could take five to seven years to show up in those metrics.

In a paper released in 2023, researchers at the University of Virginia and Brown University looked at the academic impact of state takeovers of school districts across the country. What they found was that, on average, takeovers had little impact on how students performed on state tests. But that average doesn’t tell the whole story — researchers found that takeovers had a widely varying impact from one district to another, leading to big gains in some districts, big losses in others and little impact in still others. Across the country, those effects tend to even out, said Beth Schueler, a professor of education and public policy at the University of Virginia and the lead author of the paper.

Researchers don’t completely understand the factors driving the results of state takeovers. The racial and ethnic makeup of the districts seems to make a difference, Schueler said — predominantly Hispanic districts seem to see the biggest gains, while predominantly Black districts tend to see smaller gains or even losses.

Schueler said it also isn’t clear what’s driving the difference in outcomes based on demographics. But she pointed to other research suggesting that takeovers seem to have different political implications for school districts, depending on who those districts serve. In majority-Black communities, state takeovers have tended to result in less Black representation on school boards, while in majority-Hispanic communities, takeovers seem to open the door for greater Hispanic representation. That trend can affect student performance, since separate research suggests students of color tend to do better in districts where elected officials reflect the communities they represent.

Another factor that seems to make a difference is how districts were doing academically before the takeover, Schueler said. Almost all the districts researchers looked at were struggling — that’s usually what prompted state education officials to step in — but within that group, there were some that had very low test scores and some that were closer to the middle of the pack, she said.

In general, districts that were struggling the most before state intervention tended to see better results, while those that were performing somewhat better beforehand were more likely to see their test scores decline. Schueler said state officials need to take a hard look at that factor when they’re considering taking over a school district.

It’s good to get an outside perspective once in awhile. Even better when that brings along some data you hadn’t known about before. I’m not sure where HISD would fit on the “how districts were doing academically before the takeover” scale – we’re a huge district, there were and are plenty of schools that perform well but also others that have struggled. Part of my beef with Mike Miles is that I believe he’s spent too much time and energy meddling in the affairs of the schools that didn’t need any intervention and should have been mostly left alone. Maybe sticking closer to the job he was brought here to do would have been the best course of action.

As for the representation item, I do think the appointed Board of Managers reasonably resembles both the elected Board and the district as a whole. I have my complaints about the Board but that’s not one of them. It is something for FWISD to be aware of if they go down this road. Which I hope they don’t.

One last item, about the endurance of the reforms and their long-term effect, I don’t think there’s any way that the NES model sticks around after Miles leaves. Even putting aside one’s feelings about the man, NES strikes me as a turnaround system, not a standard operating model. It’s also a financial burden at a time when the Lege is not giving districts the funding they need, and based on STAAR testing that’s on its way out. And HISD has had issues for some time with graduation rates and post-graduation accomplishments; if all we get out this takeover is some short-term gains on a to-be-obsolete testing regime, then what really was it all for? This is one of those times when I hope I am underestimating Mike Miles. Ask again in five to seven years.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fort Worth’s view of the HISD takeover

More on Austin’s MLB ambitions

Veteran Longhorn sports-knower Kirk Bohls, formerly of the Statesman and now of the Chron, has a long look at the team working to bring an MLB franchise to Austin.

Matt Mackowiak has a plan.

The long-time Austin political strategist and public relations guru seeks to bring a major-league baseball team to the biggest, untapped professional sports market in the country as he has launched a highly skilled, collaborative team looking to galvanize the community and make a bold bid for an expansion franchise.

That’s right.

He’d like to have butts in the seats of a plush, 40,000-seat, brand new stadium with a retractable roof somewhere in eastern Travis County watching Major League Baseball in the 2030s.

Just imagine it.

In the season opener in 2031, Austinites could go buy a hot dog and brewski, settle into their front-row seat behind home plate and watch the New York Yankees play the Austin Bats.

Talk about your real-life field of dreams.

But these are the dreams of chief executive officer Mackowiak and his co-founding partners, chief operating officer Derrik Fox and president Dustin Byington, just less fantasy and more factual.

Fox, who grew up near Albany, N.Y., has been to Cooperstown 40 minutes away from his grandparents’ home in upstate New York to check out the baseball Hall of Fame more times than he can count. He brings a wealth of experience in sales and marketing.

Byington is a 40-year-old who grew up in a family of San Diego Padres season ticket holders and saw about 50 home games a year since he was a sixth-grader. The one-time left tackle for Columbia’s football team moved to Austin with his wife in 2013. He is a serial entrepreneur who offers incredible finance and private equity know-how and charged with raising capital.

They can envision major league baseball in Austin maybe as soon as 2030, but more likely the following year.

There’s just a few little nagging details that need to be ironed out first between now and then:

  • Like a major investor worth billions who loves baseball.
  • Like a prime location for a brand new stadium easily accessible to many.
  • Like an announcement from major-league baseball to formalize the expansion process and timeline.
  • Like tremendous community outreach that fully impresses 30 MLB owners that Austin deserves a team.
  • Like millions of dollars to set up infrastructure, hire experts, trigger a groundswell of support and finance their pitch to MLB.

Yeah, that’s pretty much it.

Check all those boxes, and Austin is on its way to becoming the 31st or 32nd major-league baseball team. And, yes, that prospect is long overdue.

“It’s going to be a long journey,” Byington said. “I’m not saying we’re running downhill now, but we’ve sure got a heck of a lot of momentum and we’re picking up speed.”

See here for some background. This is a long story, which ran in the Sunday print edition of the Chron, and it’s worth your time to read. I think Austin is more likely to get a team when MLB goes to its next round of expansion, from 32 to 34 or (better) 36 teams, but it can’t hurt to make a strong effort now. Getting a prospective owner in place would surely help. And on the infrastructure front, anything these guys can do to magic up a commuter rail line along I-35 (because surely the future stadium will be close to I-35), both to combat the evil that is the traffic on that highway and also to make the future Bats games more easily accessible to fans from San Antonio to Georgetown, would be of great benefit to all. As I said, I don’t think they’re going to succeed. But I do think they’re going to put forth a fine effort, and it will serve them well in the possibly not-too-distant future. Good luck, y’all.

Posted in Baseball | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on More on Austin’s MLB ambitions

Measles update: El Paso the exception

Weird.

As soon as measles started spreading in West Texas, El Paso health officials began preparing schools and day care facilities for the day the virus would inevitably arrive.

But now that it’s here, it’s not kids who are making up the brunt of the cases — it’s adults. Two-thirds of El Paso’s cases so far are among people over the age of 18, and only 7% are among school-age children.

Anyone unvaccinated can contract measles, but it tends to hit children first and hardest. Most children are not fully vaccinated until they are five years old and they spend more time than adults in congregate settings where the virus can spread quickly. More families of young children are opting out of vaccines, leaving them exposed.

Gaines County, the epicenter of the outbreak, followed this traditional path, starting with school-age children before spreading to adults. Almost six months into what is now the country’s largest measles outbreak since 2000, Texas’ 722 cases are about evenly spread between the three age groups the state divides them into: under four, 5-17 and adults.

El Paso stands out for its high rate of adult infections. The county only has 56 cases so far, the third-highest among Texas counties but still too small of a sample size to conclude much, public health experts say. But if this trend holds, it may be a credit to El Paso’s high vaccination rates among kids — 96% of kindergartners and 98% of seventh graders are fully vaccinated for measles, higher than the percent required to maintain herd immunity. The state does not track adult vaccination rates.

“That is one of the protective factors that we feel is helping us,” said El Paso public health authority Hector Ocaranza. “But still we’re going to continue to see cases of measles that are going to be clustering in some of the schools or day cares that have low immunization rates.”

These surprising initial statistics have required public health officials to change their outbreak response on the fly. They’re aiming more of their vaccination events specifically at adults, especially as many health care providers who serve adults do not have the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine on hand the way pediatricians do.

“Most of the adults, they don’t remember whether they’ve had the MMR vaccine,” Ocaranza said. “They were kids, and nobody has a shot record.”

[…]

Healthy adults are generally able to fight off the worst of a measles infection, but anyone who gets infected runs the risk of it morphing into pneumonia or worse, said Ben Neuman, a virologist at Texas A&M University. Three of the five hospitalizations in El Paso so far are in adults.

And anyone with measles will spread it in the community, potentially to children too young to be vaccinated who are especially vulnerable to the worst outcomes, like encephalitis, deafness, blindness and permanent brain damage.

“Especially kids two years and under, their immune systems are just bad at everything,” Neuman said. “We’re all sort of helping them out with our herd immunity.”

Neuman said it’s possible that El Paso’s high rate of adult cases is “the first sign of something weird,” but he anticipates the data will start to look more normal as more people get tested.

As a reminder, if you’re not sure what your vax status is for the MMR, you can go get yourself a booster. It will only help, and if you’re the least bit anxious about it or at higher risk, there’s no good reason not to.

Good on El Paso for having an above-average child vaccination rate, which has likely helped slow the spread of the outbreak. I’ve been concerned about that since cases started popping up in the big urban centers, but so far so good. Lubbock is a slightly different story.

When Kelly Johnson Pirtle was counting down the days to her due date last year, she pictured her future as a new mom. She thought of family visits, friends becoming her village, and a healthy child.

She never considered that she might have to shield her newborn son John from a once-eradicated disease.

“You want your kids to grow up in a world that’s healthy and moving forward,” Johnson said. “That’s not true during the first few months of his life. It makes me sad.”

Pirtle is one of many new parents in Lubbock who are growing more anxious as the measles outbreak, and vaccine skepticism, spreads. And Lubbock parents aren’t the only ones terrified of their young children contracting the contagious virus. From January to April 30, 7,107 babies have received a dose of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine early, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services. It’s the state’s highest number in the last six years. It could be even higher since the data only includes children whose parents opted into submitting their information to the state.

The outbreak has ballooned to 722 cases in Texas since it began in January. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the measles outbreak is now the largest single outbreak since the U.S. declared the disease eliminated 25 years ago. Nine new cases were reported Friday, the lowest number since February. However, health officials can’t consider an outbreak over until there’s been a 42-day period without a new case.

As the outbreak spreads beyond West Texas, skepticism about the vaccine has intensified, including at a national level. U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a known vaccine skeptic, has spread misinformation about the vaccine. Earlier this month, Kennedy ordered federal health agencies to research new treatments for measles. Public health officials have said two doses of the MMR vaccine is the most effective way to prevent measles.

However, a lot of time stands between those two doses and a sense of security for new parents. Doctors recommend that children get their first dose of the MMR vaccine when they are 12 months old. The timeline is shorter — just six months — for children in areas with an outbreak.

That is the case in Lubbock, about 87 miles northeast of Gaines County where the outbreak started and more than 400 cases have been confirmed. There have been 53 confirmed cases in Lubbock County. Lubbock, with a population of 267,000, is the largest city in the South Plains and serves as a medical hub for the region. Due to a dearth of rural hospitals and physicians, people from all over the region flock to Lubbock for health care.

It has left the city and its residents to figure out how to protect themselves when so much of the outbreak is out of their control. Some new parents in Lubbock have reverted to COVID-era precautions — limited contact with people outside the home and avoiding crowded places. On social media groups, women ask other moms how young babies infected with measles fared, and share details on vaccine clinics. Others share locations where cases have been reported for other parents to avoid.

And at this point, they aren’t just battling the outbreak. They are also battling the consequences of a growing distrust about the vaccine, including school and child care centers closing as cases pop up.

A 2024 KFF study found that exemption rates have gone up nationwide. The amount of kindergartners in the U.S. who were exempted from at least one required vaccine increased to 3.3%. Since 2018, the requests to the Texas Department of State Health Services for an exemption form have doubled from 45,900 to more than 93,000 in 2024.

In Lubbock County, 92% of kindergarteners reported being vaccinated against measles in the 2023-2024 school year, about 2 percentage points lower than the state average, according to latest state data.

I wish all the people who are taking this seriously well. It’s a real shame that especially in a place like Lubbock where the sick people need to go to get care that new parents have to act like we’re back in the COVID days. Hopefully that won’t be for too much longer, but we know it’s not truly going to go away.

One small bright side of this outbreak is that there has been an increase in children getting vaccinated.

More Texas parents are opting to vaccinate their babies early against measles, nearly a 4.5-fold increase so far this year compared to 2019, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services.

From January through April, 7,107 children between the ages of 6 months and 11 months were vaccinated for measles, which is typically reserved for infants about to travel internationally or living in a measles outbreak area. Otherwise, doctors usually administer the first dose of the vaccine when they turn 1 year old.

For the same period in 2019, only 1,591 children between 6 months old and 11 months old were vaccinated for measles.

[…]

“It does show that parents really are scared, and that parents don’t want to wait,” said Nina Masters, a senior applied research scientist at Truveta, a Washington-based company that is studying Texas’ vaccination data. “They don’t want to wait 12 months to get their child vaccinated. They want to wait six months and one day, and they want to do it as soon as they can.”

And, since state data only reflects vaccine information parents voluntarily give to them, the number of babies receiving the vaccine early is probably higher. Masters’ company estimates an 11-fold increase in the number of early measles vaccine shots in Texas between 2019 and 2025, according to a study released this week.

The Truveta study found that in March and April of this year, 20% of all first measles vaccine doses given to 2-year-olds and younger were in babies who were 6 months old to 11 months old.

“This is a really big jump,” Masters said.

Increased vaccine uptake is among the reasons local health officials have seen the number of new measles cases drop in recent days. Last week, only nine new cases were reported, the lowest number over a 7-day period since February. Other factors contributing to the slowdown include natural immunity, quick identification of cases by providers and public health workers, and more infected people staying home because of better measles awareness, officials say.

[…]

Because children younger than one have less developed immune systems, the “zero” or earlier dose is weaker than a regular vaccine and offers just enough protection to cover the child, but not enough to offer lifelong protection, said Katherine Wells, Lubbock’s health director.

Wells said if she had a 6-month-old child, she would have them vaccinated with an earlier dose.

For the past few months, Texas health officials have asked parents to consider this earlier dose if they plan to travel or live in the outbreak area or plan to travel internationally.

West Texas public health officials have posted flyers throughout the region and held press conferences and vaccination clinics to encourage more people to vaccinate against measles, which is the most effective way to prevent infection. Pediatricians in West Texas have been emailing and texting patients to let them know they can vaccinate children earlier than 12 months old.

Lubbock, where 53 measles cases have been reported, is 75 miles from Gaines County, where the measles outbreak began in late January. Wells said Wednesday her department has distributed 500 more measles doses than they normally do this year, mostly to children. She said pediatricians in the area are responsible for about another 2,500 more than normal and private physicians have administered most of the early doses to babies.

As with the measles cases, the count of new vaccinations is likely too low, as the data is incomplete and not everyone reports getting the shots. And I’m glad to hear that there’s a nice increase in Lubbock as well. I really hope this is a multi-year trend now and not just a fear-induced bump. That would still be better than nothing, I would just like to think that there will be some lasting effect.

Also, after reading this NBC News story on the same topic, I wonder how much of this is people pushing up the schedule for their kids’ shots – in other words, people who would have gotten their kids vaxxed anyway but just got on it sooner because of the outbreak – and how much of it is people who for whatever the reason might have delayed or failed to get their kids vaxxed doing so. Clearly some, probably most, of it is the former, but surely some is the latter as well. That’s where the real difference will be made.

Because look, we can use all the help we can get.

A government report released on Thursday covering wide swaths of American health and wellness reflects some of the most contentious views on vaccines, the nation’s food supply, pesticides and prescription drugs held by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The much-anticipated “Make America Healthy Again” report calls for increased scrutiny of the childhood vaccine schedule, a review of the pesticides sprayed on American crops and a description of the nation’s children as overmedicated and undernourished.

[…]

Increased scrutiny of childhood vaccines — credited with saving millions of people from deadly diseases — figures prominently in the report. It poses questions over the necessity of school mandates that require children to get vaccinated for admittance and suggestions that vaccines should undergo more clinical trials, including with placebos.

Kennedy, a longtime vaccine critic, has raised doubts about the safety of shots even as a measles outbreak has sickened more than 1,000 Americans. This week, Kennedy’s health department moved to limit U.S. access to COVID-19 shots.

The report does not provide any evidence that the childhood vaccine schedule, which includes shots for measles, polio and the chickenpox, is to blame for rising obesity, diabetes or autism rates, said Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease physician at Johns Hopkins University.

“It’s not as if they’re positing any kind of causal link,” Adalja said, adding that Kennedy is “is trying to devalue vaccines in the minds of Americans.”

We are awash in bullshit, and people like RFK Jr are out there spraying it around. I don’t know what things are going to look like on the other side of this, but it’s not great right now.

Ahead of the Friday case count update but after the stories above came out, we learn that measles has arrived in Central Texas.

The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) confirmed a case of measles in Atascosa County, just south of San Antonio, on April 21, that was determined to be linked to the West Texas outbreak. The exposure was centered west of Poteet.

On Tuesday, another case in Kyle was confirmed.

With a population of about 63,000, Kyle is located in Hays County on the Interstate 35 corridor between San Marcos and Austin.

These cases are the closest San Antonio has come to a brush with the highly infectious disease since health authorities warned in late February that a West Texas resident diagnosed with measles spent a weekend visit in San Antonio.

Dr. Jason Bowling, an infectious disease specialist and chief epidemiologist at University Health, said that while he is glad there has not been a case in Bexar County, it wouldn’t take much given the outbreaks nationwide and how contagious the pathogen really is — many times more than the COVID-19 virus, for example.

[…]

The recent deadly measles outbreak in Texas appears to have driven an increase in the number of people who are vaccinated against measles, according to data from DSHS.

Though the data is incomplete because most people have not opted in to the Texas immunization registry, more than 320,000 people statewide have received the MMR vaccine since the start of the year versus over 277,000 in the first six months of 2024.

In West Texas where the outbreak is concentrated, that number doubled, from just over 7,500 to over 13,600.

Vaccination rates in Atascosa County are among the highest in the state with 98.5% of kindergartners and 99% of seventh graders having received the MMR vaccine.

The rates are slightly lower in Hays County, with 95% of kindergartners and 96% of seventh graders. Adult vaccination rates are not available.

Good for Atascosa and Hays Counties, hopefully their high vax rates will keep this from spreading too much. I will continue to monitor it, however often I post about it.

And that brings me to the latest update.

The total number of confirmed cases linked to the measles outbreak is now up to 728 in Texas, according to the latest update from the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS). That’s a total of six new cases since Tuesday’s update.

Ninety-four people have been hospitalized with measles since it first broke out in Gaines County in January.

The DSHS underscores that this is the total number of people hospitalized over the course of the outbreak. It is not, however, the current number of people in the hospital.

Based on the most recent data, DSHS has identified designated outbreak counties with ongoing measles transmission: Cochran, Dawson, Gaines, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

On Thursday, state and local officials confirmed a measles case in Brewster County. This is the first reported case to appear in the Big Bend region since a measles outbreak began earlier this year in West Texas near the New Mexico border.

The DSHS said that the case was directly linked to the ongoing Texas outbreak that began in Gaines County in January.

There were four new cases in that Tuesday update, so ten for the week. This story has a nice graph showing the total case numbers, and the curve definitely flattened as of the May 6 update. We’ll see if we maintain this new roughly-ten-cases-a-week pace going forward. Stay safe out there.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Measles update: El Paso the exception

Trojan “abortion exceptions” bill passes

For better or worse.

A bill clarifying when doctors can perform abortions under Texas’ near-total ban will now go to Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk after the House approved the bill with wide bipartisan support. Despite some concerns raised by conservative Republicans, the narrow bill does not expand abortion access, but rather aims to ensure pregnant patients can get life-saving medical care.

Bill sponsor Rep. Charlie Geren, a Republican from Fort Worth, stressed that this was not a “choice bill,” but rather an attempt to ensure the existing limits of the law are “clear, consistent, fair and understandable.”

“We do not want women to die from medical emergencies during their pregnancy,” Geren said before a preliminary vote Wednesday. “We don’t want women’s lives to be destroyed because their bodies have been seriously impaired.”

Texas banned all abortions three years ago, with a narrow exception that allows doctors to terminate a pregnancy only to save a pregnant patient’s life. Immediately, doctors and legal experts warned that this exception was too narrow and vaguely written, and the penalties too severe, to ensure that women could get life-saving care.

That has proven true in many cases. Dozens of women have come forward with stories of medically necessary abortions delayed or denied, and at least three women have died as a result of these laws. Faced with these stories, Republican lawmakers have conceded that the language of the law might need some clearing up.

Senate Bill 31, also called the Life of the Mother Act, aligns language among the state’s abortion laws, codifies court rulings and requires education for doctors and lawyers on the nuances of the law. It passed the House 134-4 on Thursday.

The bill was tightly negotiated among lobbyists for doctors and hospitals, anti-abortion groups and Republican lawmakers, including Sen. Bryan Hughes of Mineola, who authored the bill, and Geren.

“These groups don’t always see eye to eye,” Geren said. “But in this case, they worked together to ensure pregnant women with pregnancy complications get appropriate and timely care.”

In the Senate, Republicans threw their support behind the bill, while Democrats pushed back on its narrowness, noting that Texas law still does not allow abortions in cases of rape, incest or lethal fetal anomalies.

“The folks who are working on this fix are, from my perspective, the folks who have created the problem,” said Houston Sen. Molly Cook. “Over the past four years, we’ve watched women suffer and die, and this bill is the confirmation that we all agree that something is broken in Texas.”

In the House, however, the bill faced headwinds from the right, as conservative Republicans rallied to the idea that this bill would allow doctors to resume elective abortions. Rep. Brent Money, a Greenville Republican, said he believed the laws were clear as written but there had been “malicious interpretations” by pro-abortion doctors.

[…]

Some doctors groups, including the Texas chapter of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have criticized the bill for not going far enough to protect doctors and the patients they treat. Others say these changes will be sufficient to free doctors to perform medically necessary abortions without fear of lengthy prison sentences and massive fines.

Texas Hospital Association president John Hawkins said in a statement that the bill’s passage is “a great step forward for Texas women and health care.”

“We’re grateful we were able to move past the politics to find common ground,” Hawkins said. “Lawmakers followed through on input from patients, hospitals and physicians to strengthen and clarify laws to better protect moms. Once finalized, this will have an immediate and positive impact, helping us provide life-saving care to pregnant women in distress.”

See here for some background. Sen. Cook is correct, but this is what we got, and it comes with a lot of caveats. I’ll let Jessica Valenti explain where we ended up.

Abortion, Every Day first reported on SB 31 back in March, warning that it was a Trojan Horse—a bill designed to bring back a 1925 abortion ban that could be used to prosecute abortion funds, helpers, and even patients. AED’s reporting created a domino effect of coverage that put pressure on lawmakers to amend the bill and walk that plan back.

Their original plans foiled, Republicans have since shifted their attention to another bill—SB 2880—where they’re still trying to revive that century-old ban. And SB 31? Still a big problem!

The bill allows Texas Republicans to pretend that they’ve ‘softened’ their stance and offered legal clarity to doctors, even though it doesn’t actually expand exceptions. What’s more, the bill requires doctors to take a continuing education course about the state’s abortion ban—designed and taught by an organization hand-picked by Texas Republicans.

Translation: anti-abortion activists will be teaching doctors when and how they’re allowed to save a woman’s life.

How do I know? Because we’ve seen this before! When South Dakota Republicans passed a similar requirement, the state teamed up with the extremist American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) to create their ‘educational’ materials for doctors.

This is an organization that insists abortion is never medically necessary—and recommends c-sections for women with life-threatening pregnancies rather than safer, faster, less painful abortions. So maybe not the best folks to be giving medical advice!

Per usual, Texas is a testing ground for what anti-abortion groups want nationally. These so-called ‘Med Ed’ bills—which are becoming a trend—let lawmakers pretend they’re working with doctors to clarify care, when what they’re really doing is establishing a terrifying new norm: that the government gets to dictate when and how doctors treat their patients in medical emergencies.

So there you have it. And by the way, that other bill SB2880 got voted out of the House committee, meaning it is likely to get passed if it comes to a floor vote before Tuesday, when another deadline kicks in. What does this bill do?

If the bill becomes law, anyone who manufactures, distributes, mails, prescribes or provides abortion-inducing drugs can be sued for up to $100,000, even if the pills aren’t proven to be the cause of death for the fetus. It expands the wrongful death statute to encourage men whose partners willingly terminate their pregnancies to sue whoever provided the pills for up to six years after the event. It also empowers the Attorney General to bring lawsuits on behalf of “unborn children of residents of this state.”

The bill also contains a controversial provision that says it cannot be challenged in state court before it is enforced, and a state judge who holds the law to be unconstitutional can be personally sued for $100,000.

Isn’t that lovely? Look, SB31 passed with broad bipartisan support, as Democrats believed, with justification, that it was the best they were going to get this session. But that one bill allows for a lot of cover for the others, and there’s no way to look at this session and conclude that abortion access and women’s health are any better off now than they were going in. The narrative that Republicans did something to make things a little better is powerful and enticing, and even if that were objectively true it doesn’t change the fact that on net we’re 99% worse than we were in 2021. We can’t lose sight of that and we can’t let any counterfactual take hold.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Trojan “abortion exceptions” bill passes

Tesla robotaxis to arrive in Austin in June

Don’t use them, I say. Make Elon cry.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirmed that the company will have robotaxis on the streets of Austin, Texas, by the end of June.

In an interview with CNBC’s David Faber on Tuesday at the company’s headquarters in Austin, Musk said Tesla aims to bring its robotaxis to Los Angeles and San Francisco following the planned Austin debut.

Musk said a Tesla robotaxi service will start with about 10 vehicles in Austin, and rapidly expand to thousands of vehicles should the launch go well with no incidents.

Since 2016, Musk has been promising Tesla investors, customers and fans that the company is about a year away from delivering a self-driving car that’s capable of transporting passengers safely without human interventions, or a human at the steering wheel. However, Tesla does not yet offer a vehicle safe to use without human supervision.

“It’s prudent for us to start with a small number, confirm that things are going well and then scale it up,” Musk said.

To start, Tesla has said its robotaxis will be Model Y vehicles equipped with a forthcoming version of FSD, or full self-driving, known as FSD Unsupervised.

Alphabet’s Waymo is currently operating commercial, driverless ride-hailing services in various U.S. markets. On a recent earnings call, Alphabet said Waymo already conducts 250,000 paid trips per week.

Musk said Tesla “will geofence” its robotaxis in Austin to start, meaning the company will limit where those Model Y vehicles can drive. But there won’t be a human safety driver in the cars, Musk promised.

Tesla employees will be remotely monitoring the fleet, he said.

“We’ll be watching what the cars are doing very carefully and as confidence grows, less of that will be needed,” Musk said.

Musk has previously claimed Tesla’s “generalized” approach to robotaxis is more ambitious than Waymo’s. Tesla relies on camera-based systems and computer vision primarily instead of using sophisticated sensors including lidar and radar in its vehicles.

Musk has said those sensors were expensive and could impede high-volume robotaxi production and scaling of a global fleet.

“What will actually work best for the road system is artificial intelligence, digital neural nets and cameras,” Musk said Tuesday.

See here, here, and here for some background. As noted, Waymo is already an option and use can use the Uber app to ride them, if you must do rideshare without interacting with a human. While I can see good reasons to use the autonomous taxis, I cannot think of a single valid reason to put any money in Elon Musk’s pocket in doing so. This is a choice – again, there’s already a good option available to you in Austin and soon to be wherever else – so make the right choice. If you choose to use Musk’s rancid service, that’s entirely on you. Don’t be that person.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Tesla robotaxis to arrive in Austin in June

Lege goes for full THC ban

Welp.

The Texas House late Wednesday gave initial approval to a bill that would ban all products containing tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, likely spelling the end for the state’s short-lived hemp industry.

Under the legislation, which is nearing the governor’s desk for approval, adults would face up to a year in jail for possessing hemp products with any amount of THC — a stricter penalty than what is on the books for possessing up to 2 ounces of marijuana.

The bill’s expected passage portends a minor earthquake for the state’s economy, effectively shuttering a field that, by one estimate, accounts for roughly 50,000 jobs and generates $8 billion in tax revenue annually.

THC products, now a ubiquitous presence at gas stations, convenience stores and thousands of other retailers across Texas, are now poised to be taken off the shelves. The about-face comes six years after the Legislature inadvertently touched off a massive boom in hemp-based products when lawmakers, intending to boost Texas agriculture, authorized the sale of consumable hemp.

Though that 2019 law does not allow products to contain more than trace amounts of delta-9 THC, it did not establish that same threshold for other hemp derivatives. Critics say the hemp industry has exploited that loophole to the tune of more than 8,000 retailers now selling THC-laced edibles, drinks, vapes and flower buds.

The vote ended months of suspense over how the House would handle competing calls to ban or regulate THC, the psychoactive element in marijuana.

This session, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who oversees the Senate, has led the charge to eradicate the industry, which he accuses of preying on susceptible minors by setting up stores near schools and marketing products to children. The Senate passed legislation in March to ban all THC products, and the Republican leader threatened to force an overtime session of the Legislature if the House did not get on board.

“I’ve been here for 17 years at the Texas Capitol — 10 years as your lieutenant governor. I’ve never been more passionate about anything,” Patrick said in a video posted on social media Monday evening. “I’m not gonna leave Austin until we get this done.”

Hemp industry leaders and advocates say criticism of THC products and retailers is overblown. Shortly after Wednesday’s House vote, Lukas Gilkey, chief executive of Hometown Hero, a manufacturer of hemp-derived products, said industry leaders would immediately begin preparing a lawsuit to challenge the expected ban.

Gilkey said the legal fight would be waged by the Texas Hemp Business Council, a trade group that released a statement late Wednesday blasting the House for ignoring “the voices of small businesses, farmers, veterans and consumers across the state who rely on hemp-derived products for their livelihoods and well-being.”

In lieu of an outright ban, hemp manufacturers and retailers had urged House lawmakers to adopt stricter oversight and licensing requirements, including those found in the previous House draft of the legislation, which would have preserved some types of THC products.

A majority of House lawmakers did away with that approach on Wednesday, voting 86-53 to back a floor amendment from Rep. Tom Oliverson, R-Cypress, that overhauled the bill by essentially restoring the version approved by the Senate two months ago. It was a major blow for the hemp industry, which had leaned on the House as the bulwark against the Senate’s unwavering bid to outlaw THC. Several Democrats joined with the House’s Republican majority in support of the ban.

[…]

Rep. Gene Wu, D-Houston and chair of the House Democratic Caucus, framed the vote as a move “backwards in time” that defied a trend seen in other states to expand access to recreational marijuana or THC.

“We’re still rehashing parts of ‘Reefer Madness’ from the ‘50s and ‘60s,” Wu said. “We thought that we’ve gotten past this, that we’ve grown, that we’ve gotten smarter. … But here we are, back again.”

He added that the “overwhelming majority” of veterans’ groups are “aggressively supporting legalization” and want regulations rather than a ban — an attitude, Wu argued, that reflects the broader view of Texas residents.

“Texans as a whole do not want something that they’ve had access to for the last five years, something that they’ve enjoyed recreationally, that has helped them medically, that has made their lives better — they don’t want this ban either,” he said.

See here for the background. Good luck with the lawsuit – I’m not sure offhand on what grounds they would sue, but I’ll find out when they do. I will say this again, more slowly this time: The Texas Hemp Business Council and everyone else who liked and used these products and who would someday like to see Texas decriminalize marijuana need to go all in on un-electing Dan Patrick. I mean, what do you have to fear from him at this point? The Sisypheans who keep pushing for expanded gambling every other year can continue to delude themselves that if they throw enough money and lobbyists around they might somehow overcome Danno’s resistance. The hemp folks cannot possibly be laboring under that illusion now. I know that electing a Democratic Lite Guv seems impossible, but 1) you literally have nothing to lose; 2) this is an issue with broad support; and 3) what is the alternative? Take your best shot at throwing him out of office. It’s your only hope. The Chron, Reform Austin, Lone Star Left, and The Barbed Wire have more.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Winning Humble ISD candidate declared ineligible

This is rough.

A candidate who won her bid for the Humble ISD school board on May 3 has now been declared ineligible after her opponent challenged her candidacy, a district spokesperson confirmed Tuesday.

Brittnai Brown, a former educator, was sued by opponent Tracy Shannon after the election, and the lawsuit cited voter records that showed that Brown did was not registered to vote in the district for the required six months before the filing deadline to run for the board.

Brown and Shannon both cast bids to unseat the incumbent trustee Ken Kirchhofer for position four on the board. Vote totals from May 3 show that Brown took the lead, with 4,066 votes, Shannon came in second with 3,237 votes and Kirchhofer came in last place with 3,197 votes.

In the lawsuit, Shannon had asked for an injunction to canvassing the votes and for herself to be named victor instead, because she had the second highest number of votes. She also accused officials in the district of being unable to read at the last board meeting due to the discrepancy.

“The district has taken the right step in declaring Ms. Brown ineligible. The pleadings in the lawsuit speak for themselves,” Shannon said. “I ran against Ken Kirchhofer because I believe the district deserves better. There was a clear call for accountability in the district and I believe the election results reflect that appetite for accountability.”

But the district still canvassed the votes at a board meeting on May 13 because the district’s legal counsel, Jeremy Binkley said that the district was legally obligated to canvass the votes on the 11th day after the election. Binkley also said if the trustee-elect was declared ineligible, it would create a vacant seat on the board that would be filled either with a special election or by board appointment.

After reviewing voter records, the district found that Brown’s registration on Feb. 14 listed a Houston ISD address. Brown changed her address to a Humble ISD address where she now lives likely around the time of the filing deadline, but it did not become effective until March 16, because it takes 30 days for changes on voter registration to become effective, according to Texas Secretary of State guidelines.

Until a decision is made by the board about whether to call a special election or to fill the seat by appointment, Kirchhofer will continue to serve on the board, according to Humble ISD’s Chief Communications Officer Jamie Mount. She confirmed that the school board has not met to determine how to move forward, but that the rest of the candidates who won their seats will be confirmed at a board meeting on June 10.

Mount said that the district “has not experienced a problem with candidate voter registration in prior elections.”

Typically, when the district receives candidate filings, the school district checks that the address on the application for a place on the ballot is within Humble ISD, that the candidate is a registered voter, and candidates sign that they are eligible to hold office under the laws of the state, Mount said.

See here and here for some background. On the surface this seems straightforward enough. I would like to understand why Humble ISD didn’t catch this up front, but that’s for them to figure out. I don’t know if Brittnai Brown was confused or got bad advice or what, but given that her win was a victory for the forces of good sense – and it’s the loser Tracy Shannon who needed to be kept off the Board – her subsequent disqualification is a setback. If Humble ISD doesn’t appoint a replacement – and if they do, please find someone other than Tracy Shannon – I sure hope a good and eligible candidate can be found quickly. This is all very unfortunate.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Winning Humble ISD candidate declared ineligible

That Waymo is watching you

Huh.

The Los Angeles Police Department obtained video footage from a Waymo driverless car as part of its investigation into a hit-and-run in which a separate, human-driven car hit a pedestrian.

The LAPD published the footage, which has a note on it that reads “Waymo Confidential Commercial Information,” on its YouTube page to ask the public for help identifying the driver of the vehicle. The short clip shows what video footage that law enforcement requests from Waymo looks like.

The situation shows that police in Los Angeles are now looking at Waymo robotaxis as potential sources of surveillance footage to investigate crimes that the vehicles’ cameras and sensors may have witnessed. In 2023, Bloomberg reported that police in both San Francisco and Maricopa County, Arizona, had issued search warrants for Waymo footage. Police have also requested footage from Teslas, extremely pervasive Ring cameras, and Cruise autonomous vehicles.

[…]

A Waymo spokesperson told 404 Media that it does not proactively give footage to police.

“Waymo does not provide information or data to law enforcement without a valid legal request, usually in the form of a warrant, subpoena, or court order. These requests are often the result of eyewitnesses or other video footage that identifies a Waymo vehicle at the scene,” the spokesperson said. “We carefully review each request to make sure it satisfies applicable laws and is legally valid. We also analyze the requested data or information, to ensure it is tailored to the specific subject of the warrant. We will narrow the data provided if a request is overbroad, and in some cases, object to producing any information at all.”

Waymo’s website explains that it conducts training sessions for law enforcement and emergency responders, which is designed to teach them about Waymo and explains what they should do in case they are responding to a car crash or other emergency involving a Waymo. The page says it had “conducted in-person training for 18,000+ first responders at 75+ agencies.”

You can see the video of the crash at the story link. This shouldn’t be a surprise, but I admit I hadn’t thought of it before reading the story. There’s clearly value in that kind of footage being available. There’s also a clear potential threat to public safety when there are authoritarians and wannabes who can get access to it as well. The obvious remedy is laws that require transparency and put strict limits on the use of such footage. We’re going to have to do the best we can until such a law could plausibly be passed.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on That Waymo is watching you