UnidosUS poll of Latino voters about current events

Posted on May 2, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

From the inbox:

UnidosUS, Voces Unidas, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and Climate Power en Acción released today findings from the 2025 “First 100 Days Bipartisan Poll of the Hispanic Electorate,” the largest national bipartisan poll of U.S. Latino voters. The survey of 1,002 registered Latino voters nationwide, with oversamples in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida and Texas, shows that pocketbook issues continue to dominate the concerns of Latino voters — cost of living, jobs, housing and health care affordability — with immigration rounding up the top five. On the economy, 54% of Latino respondents said it is worse when compared to last year; 60% believe things are going in the wrong direction, and 70% of them hold President Trump and his administration responsible.

  • Click HERE to watch a replay of today’s webinar.
  • Click HERE to see a slide presentation of the poll’s national toplines.
  • Click HERE to view Latino vote results by state.
  • For interactive Latino poll results, see Hispanic Electorate Data Hub.
“Latino voters are frustrated that their economic priorities are being ignored and that a key promise made by President Trump during the election is not being kept. Economic discontent was the most potent driver in the 2024 election, helping President Trump increase support among Latinos. But over half of Hispanic voters feel the economy is worse now than a year ago and nearly as many believe it will be worse a year from now,” said Janet Murguía, president and CEO of UnidoUS.
Key Findings Include:
On President Trump and his Administration
  • 63% have an unfavorable view of the President, and 59% disapprove of the job he is doing.
  • 61% and 52% respectively have an unfavorable view of Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
  • Two-thirds (66%) of Hispanic voters believe the Trump tariffs will hurt the economy and lead to higher prices.
On U.S. Congress
  • 60% have an unfavorable view of Republicans in Congress, and 59% disapprove of the way they are handling their congressional majority.
  • 63% have a favorable view of Democrats in Congress, and 58% approve of how they are handling their role in Congress, with 60% saying Democrats should fight hard against the Trump administration and his policies.
  • 59% are not confident that Congress attempts to act in the best interest of Latinos, with only 15% stating they are “very confident” in Congress today.
On Issues, Policies and Political Environment
  • Four of the top five priorities for Hispanic voters continue to be driven by pocketbook issues.
  • #1 Cost of living / inflation (52%) — main concerns are cost of food and basic living expenses, housing affordability.
  • #2 Jobs and economy (40%) — wages, job security, prices, job creation.
  • #3 Housing (28%) — rising cost of rent and cost of electricity, utilities, taxes, home insurance, home maintenance and repairs.
  • #4 Health care (23%) — cost of insurance and prescription medications.
  • #5 Immigration (21%) — legalization for long-residing undocumented immigrants and those brought here as children, cracking down on human traffickers and drug smugglers.
  • 58% disapprove of changing Medicaid policies related to eligibility and coverage to cut $600-$800 billion from the program over the next 10 years.
  • 64% disagree with cutting personnel and offices from programs like Medicaid and Social Security.
  • 62% oppose reducing funds for the federal government’s SNAP program.
  • Two-thirds (66%) of Hispanic voters believe the rule of law is failing and the constitution is being violated.
On the Economic Landscape
  • 60% believe President Trump and congressional Republicans are not focusing enough attention on lowering the cost of everyday necessities.
  • Compared to last year, 54% feel the economy is worse now, with only 19% thinking it’s doing better. 35% say their own financial situation is worse.
  • Looking to the year ahead, 50% believe current economic policies will make their economic situation worse off.
  • Nearly half (49%) blame President Trump for the rising cost of living; 16% blame former President Biden.
  • Two-thirds (66%) believe the tariffs President Trump is implementing will reduce their economic opportunity and security by raising the price for goods and services; 64% believe tariffs were a bad move and that trade will be terrible for the United States.
On Immigration & Border Security
  • 78% of Latino voters believe it is important to deport dangerous criminals, but that President Trump and congressional Republicans should not target long-residing undocumented immigrants without criminal records.
  • Top immigration policy priorities are a path to citizenship for long-residing undocumented immigrants and those brought to the country as children (66%), and cracking down on human smugglers and drug traffickers (46%).
  • Nearly half (49%) of Latino voters feel that the Trump administration’s deportation policies put them, their family and/or friends at risk.
  • As for recent immigration policies and actions, 43% think many people fear immigration authorities will arrest them even if they’re U.S. citizens or have legal status.
  • 60% disapprove the administration’s actions of deporting undocumented immigrants from the U.S. without court hearings.
  • 62% disagree with eliminating birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to an undocumented parent.
On Climate Progress & Cost of Energy
  • 60% disapprove of eliminating funds for programs that help Americans pay their electricity bills to help cut the federal budget.
  • 59% disapprove of cutting federal aid for programs designed to address the impact of climate change and extreme weather events on local communities.
  • 57% disapprove of cutting funds for programs designed to improve environmental conditions in minority communities to help cut the overall federal budget.
“The latest poll underscores a harsh reality: nearly two-thirds of Latino voters believe the country is heading in the wrong direction, with 70% of them holding President Trump responsible. Economic struggles dominate their concerns, from rising costs to job insecurity, and immigration remains a top issue. Latinos, once seen as a battleground demographic, have become disillusioned, with many shifting their support toward Trump only to face broken promises. The League of United Latin American Citizens has fought to protect civil rights and secure victories in federal lawsuits against this administration, but the growing frustration in this poll signals a community that’s fed up and demanding major change,” said Juan Proaño, CEO of the League of United Latin American Citizens.
“Economic concerns are still very top of mind for Latinos and climate change is viewed as an economic issue,” Antonieta Cadiz, Deputy Executive Director of Climate Power En Acción, said. “Latinos constantly support legislation that protects communities from climate disasters, lowers energy costs, and invests in clean energy because we’ve seen the benefits firsthand. Often on the frontlines of extreme weather and pollution, Latinos recognize when clean energy policies reduce harmful emissions, improve air and water quality, cut energy bills, and create good-paying jobs.”
“In survey after survey, in Colorado and across the country, Latinas and Latinos continue to identify cost-of-living issues as a top concern that have not been adequately addressed by policymakers,” said Alex Sánchez of Voces Unidas, which co-leads the Colorado Latino Agenda, a statewide public research initiative that publishes relevant and timely in-depth reports about Latinas and Latinos in Colorado. “Consistent with our past research, this recent national poll also shows the energy behind more common-sense immigration policy reforms over just border security. Latinos are telling us that they want humane immigration policies, and they continue to reject the approach of the current administration.”
Murguía also added: “Latino voters are also alarmed and angered by what they’re seeing play out on the threats to our democracy. There continues to be a large gap between Latino voter positions and current actions, including on immigration, where Latinos reaffirm their support for legalizing the long-residing undocumented people and oppose draconian immigration measures like deporting people without due process. And reflecting those concerns, two-thirds of Hispanic voters believe the rule of law is failing and the constitution is being violated. In an environment of razor thin margins, politicians should listen to and act on the call from this influential group: start focusing on efforts to improve economic conditions for working Americans.”
About the 2025 100-Day Hispanic Electorate Poll:
Bipartisan pollster team, BSP Research and Shaw & Co.
  • Total N=1,002 voters
  • N= 150 per: California, Florida, Texas.
  • N= 100 per: Arizona, Colorado.
  • Margin of error +/- 3.1%.
Field Dates: April 11– April 19, 2025
  • Survey available in English and Spanish, according to respondent preference
  • Mixed mode: live phones, text invites, online panels.

As noted, the poll data, which they conveniently broke out by state, is here. The sample for Texas is small, at 150 respondents, and the ones who voted last November went for Harris over Trump by a 57-41 margin, so reasonably Dem-friendly. That said, and without getting in too deep because the margin of error is large (8% MoE for a sample size of 150), the numbers are brutal for Trump, starting with the 31-66 approve/disapprove and going from there. I’ll leave it to you to peruse, with the usual caveat that this is just one result. It’s in line with Trump’s overall terrible numbers, but it’s a snapshot from today. Reality can change quickly, as we have too often seen.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Beto 3.0?

Posted on May 2, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Maybe.

Beto O’Rourke

Beto O’Rourke, a one-time Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and Texas Governor, is holding town halls across the state.

It’s the kind of thing someone running for office would do.

O’Rourke is not currently a candidate, but on Saturday in Denton, he indicated he could be again in the future.

During one of his town halls at Anderson’s Eatery and Distillery, a woman asked if he would announce his candidacy for U.S. Senate in 2026.

“If it comes to pass that this is what the people of Texas want, that it’s the highest and best use of what I can give to you, then yes, I will,” he said to cheers and applause.

In an interview after the rally with WFAA, he gave a similar answer.

“I’m going to do whatever is most helpful for the people of Texas,” he told WFAA. “Right now, it’s bringing people together at town hall meetings. It’s traveling the state. It’s registering voters. It’s leading Powered by People, our volunteer organization. So, we’ll see what the future holds, but I’m going to do whatever is the greatest good for the greatest number in this state,” he said.

“I’m going to listen to the people of this state, wherever they need me, whatever I can do, wherever I’m helpful, that’s where I’m going to be.”

If he wants to run and he can either defeat Terry Virts and Colin Allred and anyone else who might want to run in a primary, or convince them to drop out and support him instead, then he is indeed the choice of the Democratic primary-voting people. I’ll be happy to support him, and I’ll be happy to support someone else if it’s not him. The alternative is likely to be Ken Paxton, so let’s try not to be too precious about this. The Current has more.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Dispatches from Dallas, May 2 edition

Posted on May 2, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

This is a weekly feature produced by my friend Ginger. Let us know what you think.

This week, in news from Dallas-Fort Worth we have: early voting turnout news for the Saturday election; local issues raised in the Lege; PACs active in area elections and who funds them, when you can find out; various immigration stories, including a lawyer who got sacked for providing pro bono advice; news about new Dallas PD Chief Daniel Comeaux that explains why his interim predecessor is out; the latest from the Tarrant County Jail (nobody died this week); school district updates, including the possibility that Fort Worth ISD may get taken over by the state; the latest on Austin Metcalf’s death and the social media frenzy around it; mass shootings in the state in 2025 so far; and babies named after Luka Doncic. And more!

This week’s post was brought to you by the music of Missy Mazzoli, whom I was lucky enough to catch one year at SXSW in an ensemble at a classical music show. Her work in the last fifteen years is a lot broader and deeper than I imagined.

This week we have another grab bag, so let’s jump in:

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Spring Branch ISD ruled to have violated the Voting Rights Act

Posted on May 1, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

And they are ordered to adopt single-member districts.

A federal judge found Spring Branch ISD violated the Voting Rights Act and ordered the west Harris County district to overhaul its system so that the voices of Hispanic voters can be heard, but the ruling doesn’t come in time for Saturday’s pivotal board races.

Seven months after the conclusion of the federal trial against Spring Branch ISD, the judge ruled on Monday that the 33,500-student district uses a system of elections that dilutes the votes of Hispanic residents on the northside of the district, making it virtually impossible for their preferred candidate to win.

District officials pointed to a letter from the board president Monday afternoon which pledged that board counsel would “analyze all potential avenues for appeal.”

The plaintiff, parent Virginia Elizondo, sued the school district after running twice for the board and losing both times, claiming that the at-large system dilutes the Hispanic vote in a district that has almost twice as many Hispanic students as white students. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 stipulates that a violation would be in a circumstance where minorities had “less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice.”

Interstate 10 divides the district socioeconomically. The northside is economically disadvantaged and has a large population of Hispanic residents, while the southside, home to Memorial Villages, is a historically white, wealthy area. Currently, all board members are from the southside of the district.

While outgoing board member John Perez is Hispanic, the court found he was not the preferred candidate of the Hispanic community on the northside of the district. Before Perez was elected, a person of color had never served on the Spring Branch ISD board since the district’s inception in 1946.

“SBISD is a high-functioning school district. But the evidence shows that the District consists of two disparate parts: one located north of I-10, and one located mostly south of I-10,” U.S. District court judge Sim Lake wrote. “South of I-10 the students are more likely to be Anglo, affluent, go to college, and more likely to meet or exceed the State’s academic standards. North of I-10 the students are more likely to be Hispanic, economically disadvantaged, dropout, less likely to meet state academic standards, and more likely to be severely disciplined.”

The district argued that the past election results where northside Hispanic preferred candidates did not win had more to do with politics than race, as the southside is largely conservative and northside voters lean more democratic, but the judge struck down that notion, finding that the plaintiff had satisfied enough conditions, including the three Gingles conditions and senate factors two, five and seven, to show that, based on the totality of the circumstances, a system of geographic representation was fair and warranted.

The judge ordered that the district had 20 days to file a plan for single member districts, composed of either seven districts or five districts and two at-large seats. The plaintiff can file objections to the plan, but once they settle on a system, the district is prohibited from conducting at-large elections in the future and must have elected trustees represent single member districts.

See here for the previous update. Judge Lake, for what it’s worth, was appointed by President Reagan. The Houston Landing adds on.

The ruling caps a roughly four-year legal battle and adds to the growing number of school districts forced to change how voters elect trustees. U.S. District Court Judge Sim Lake ordered Spring Branch to switch after this May’s board election from a fully at-large system — in which all seven trustees are chosen by all voters in a district — to one where at least five trustees are elected only by residents of parts of the district.

Lake ruled that the west Harris County district’s at-large election system enables to white voters to dilute votes cast by Hispanic residents. Lake wrote that white voters in the affluent southern half of long-divided Spring Branch “vote sufficiently as a bloc” to quash Hispanic voters’ preferred candidates, a key element that must be proven to establish a violation of the Voting Rights Act.

Lake also concluded that it’s more likely than not that Hispanic voters would make up a majority of at least one potential single-member district, another requirement of a Voting Rights Act violation.

[…]

Spring Branch parent Virginia Elizondo filed the suit against the district in 2021 after she ran two unsuccessful campaigns for Spring Branch’s board. While 57 percent of students in the district are Hispanic or Latino, no person of color had ever been elected to the board until the May 2022 election. (Hispanics make up about 25 percent of potential voters, a demographics expert testified at trial.)

Elizondo argued the lack of Latino board members left families of color in diversifying areas of Spring Branch without a representative who understands their needs.

“Of course, I’m thrilled,” Elizondo said Tuesday of the court’s decision. “This is going to help all of our students and families feel like they have a representative that understands their situation. … I think it’s going to be a difference in, you can actually approach the board and they’ll actually listen to you.”

Spring Branch voters will still cast their ballots in the upcoming May 3 trustee election under the voting system now deemed illegal. After that, Lake gave the district until May 18 to appeal the court’s decision or draw up a plan for instituting a new election system. Lake allowed Spring Branch to elect trustees through all single-member districts or employ five single-member seats and two at-large seats.

[…]

While Lake found Spring Branch’s voting system unjust, he also wrote there’s no evidence that district leaders “failed to provide outstanding educational opportunities” for all students or “failed to act in the best interest of its Hispanic students.”

Critics across the state have taken aim at the at-large election system in recent years with a wave of lawsuits similar to that in Spring Branch. A Houston Landing report found last year the at-large system in several other nearby districts — Cy-Fair, Humble, Katy, Pasadena — often leaves the lowest-income neighborhoods without a local representative. A parent in Humble ISD brought a similar lawsuit against the district last year before recently withdrawing it.

See here for more on the now-defunct lawsuit in Humble, and here for more on the big-picture issue. The Trib recently had a big story about how conservative interest groups have taken advantage of the at large-only systems in several large suburban school districts to elect a slate of wingnut candidates and shift those districts’ policies well to the right. This stuff really matters.

As to what happens next here, let’s take a moment to enjoy the victory and congratulate the plaintiffs. This ruling will almost certainly be appealed, which means that the next stop is the Fifth Circuit, where justice goes to die. That said, past rulings in places like Farmers Branch and Pasadena have stood up, so there’s no point in being nihilistic. We move forward and work to build on what we now have.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The tariff effect on your homeowners’ insurance

Posted on May 1, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

What can’t tariffs do?

President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs could cause homeowners insurance premiums in Texas to rise even faster this year than they otherwise would have, a new study finds.

Even without tariffs, average premiums in Texas will rise by about $500 this year, according to projections from Insurify, an insurance comparison shopping website. But tariffs on imports such as Canadian lumber and Mexican lime — used in concrete — would push that to $713 a year, Insurify projects, bringing the average annual cost of homeowners insurance in Texas to $6,718 by the end of 2025 — an increase of 12% over last year.

Texas homeowners already pay some of the highest home insurance rates in the nation, especially in regions such as Houston and coastal Texas. Average homeowners and auto insurance rates have seen double-digit increases in recent years, according to data from the Texas Department of Insurance, due largely to costly natural disasters as well as overall inflation.

“In the last five years, 68 billion-dollar disasters have impacted Texas, the most of any state, causing about $108 billion in damages,” wrote Chase Gardner, data insights manager for Insurify, in an email. “Texas is one of the most at-risk states for hurricanes, coastal flooding, drought, hail, lightning, tornadoes, wildfires, ice storms, strong winds, heat waves, and cold waves.”

“All of these severe weather events increase risk for insurers,” he added. “The substantial climate related losses Texas home insurers face force them to pass more risk onto homeowners in the form of higher premiums.”

If Trump’s tariffs take effect and remain in effect, Gardner explained, claims will become even costlier, which will translate into higher premiums.

Here’s a related story about how tariffs will make building a new home more expensive, too. You can thank Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, all the Republicans in Congress, Greg Abbott and Dan Patrick and Ken Paxton and all of the bootlicking enablers here in Texas.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Barc-ee’s folds

Posted on May 1, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

This is all so weird.

Back in June 2024, a canine-focused Missouri business announced itself as Barc-ee’s. Owner John Lopez told the Springfield News-Leader in Springfield, Missouri that he was hoping his 7,500-square-foot coffee shop, game yard and outdoor dog park could be a community hang, also a place where folks could stop off the road, buy some things, spend time with their traveling pups.

“Most of the time when you’re traveling with your dog, you’re kind of just holding the leash while you’re pumping gas,” Lopez told the News-Leader.

Lopez also wanted to put billboards up along the highway tempting folks to stop at Barc-ees. But Buc-ee’s, the massive gas station and convenience store business that started in 1982 in Lake Jackson and has since become a nationwide phenomenon, thought all of this felt a little too close for comfort. In March, Buc-ee’s filed a lawsuit in U.S. Western District Court of Missouri against the entities overseeing Barc-ee’s, alleging the name and imagery all attempted to mimic the Buc-ee’s brand to benefit Barc-ee’s.

[…]

In the wake of the suit, Lopez decided to comment publicly on the Barc-ee’s Facebook page March 24. First, Barc-ee’s had to close temporarily over construction issues, but also, the lawsuit:

“Although I prefer my business challenges to come with a side of coffee rather than a court summons, this is just a part of the entrepreneur game,” Lopez wrote. “My legal team believes we are not legally infringing on any trademarks. The remarks from a legal team that specializes in trademarks also believe that I could win if it went to trial, but it may not be worth the fight. Beavers are cunning creatures.”

In the following days, Barc-ee’s notified its fans over Facebook that it was facing the potential shutdown of its page. Most of the folks who commented to these posts said, “Why not just re-brand?”

On March 31, Barc-ee’s provided another update, posting an image of an AI dog-human mulling over Photoshop, and telling fans it was “busy reimagining, rethinking and envisioning where all of this is taking us.”

“Many do not realize that what they see is not just an easy ‘quick fix’ solution at hand to resolve ALL that is taking place for us,” read the post. “That interesting herbivore is not the only thing in our arena pushing us to reassess. There have been many things that have forced us into this revising season we are in.”

On April 17, Barc-ees, using an AI image of a different dog-human turning keys over to three women, announced that Barc-ee’s was officially closed for good. But the image of the dog and the keys symbolized it was turning over the land to a business called The Bean & Bubble Babes, who serve coffee, lemonade and bubble tea.

Then came an image of a third dog-human thinking up ideas for a “business plan.” Finally, on April 18, Barc-ee’s posted yet another cartoon dog, this one not quite human but still wearing a baseball hat and seemingly moving on from something. Currently, the Barc-ee’s Facebook page, which still exists as of April 27, tells folks to “stay tuned for new and exciting transformations.”

See here for the background. The thing is, the Barc-ee’s concept is a sound one. Maybe it might work better in a larger city than as an interstate rest stop, but the idea has appeal. What boggles my mind is that anyone could have thought the name would pass muster, given Buc-ee’s extreme willingness to defend its brand name and logo. There had to have been any number of name and image combinations that would have worked for them. Instead, we got the lawsuit, the “temporary” closure, and whatever this descent into Enron 2.0-levels of madness and AI imagery is. In a world where the baseline level of derangement is much higher than I’d like, I greatly enjoy this particular farce. I just hope no would-be Barc-ee’s employees were harmed by all this foolishness.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of April 28

Posted on May 1, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

The Texas Progressive Alliance wishes Pete Hegseth would stop sending us those weird Signal messages as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Continue reading →

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Measles update: The liars keep gaining

Posted on April 30, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

It’s hard out there for the facts.

While the most serious measles epidemic in a decade has led to the deaths of two children and spread to 27 states with no signs of letting up, beliefs about the safety of the measles vaccine and the threat of the disease are sharply polarized, fed by the anti-vaccine views of the country’s seniormost health official.

About two-thirds of Republican-leaning parents are unaware of an uptick in measles cases this year while about two-thirds of Democratic ones knew about it, according to a KFF survey released Wednesday.

Republicans are far more skeptical of vaccines and twice as likely (1 in 5) as Democrats (1 in 10) to believe the measles shot is worse than the disease, according to the survey of 1,380 U.S. adults.

Some 35% of Republicans answering the survey, which was conducted April 8-15 online and by telephone, said the discredited theory linking the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine to autism was definitely or probably true — compared with just 10% of Democrats.

The trends are roughly the same as KFF reported in a June 2023 survey. But in the new poll, 3 in 10 parents erroneously believed that vitamin A can prevent measles infections, a theory Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has brought into play since taking office during the measles outbreak.

About 900 cases have been reported in 27 U.S. states, mostly in a West Texas-centered outbreak.

“The most alarming thing about the survey is that we’re seeing an uptick in the share of people who have heard these claims,” said co-author Ashley Kirzinger, associate director of KFF’s Public Opinion and Survey Research Program. KFF is a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News.

“It’s not that more people are believing the autism theory, but more and more people are hearing about it,” Kirzinger said. Since doubts about vaccine safety directly reduce parents’ vaccination of their children, “that shows how important it is for actual information to be part of the media landscape,” she said.

“This is what one would expect when people are confused by conflicting messages coming from people in positions of authority,” said Kelly Moore, president and CEO of Immunize.org, a vaccination advocacy group.

Numerous scientific studies have established no link between any vaccine and autism. But Kennedy has ordered HHS to undertake an investigation of possible environmental contributors to autism, promising to have “some of the answers” behind an increase in the incidence of the condition by September.

Putting liars into positions of authority surely doesn’t help with this. Maybe copious amounts of mockery such phony authorities can help, but I feel like it will take a lot more than that. I’m not smart enough to know what a fix might be.

I don’t have any other news items, so let’s just get right to the numbers.

The measles outbreak centered in the South Plains region of Texas grew to 663 cases on Tuesday, according to health officials.

The latest update from the Texas Department of State Health Services adds 17 new cases since the agency’s last update on Friday. More than 95% of cases seen during the outbreak have been in individuals who have not received the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, or whose vaccination status is unknown.

The latest update adds 23 hospitalizations that had not been reported earlier in the outbreak, increasing the total number of hospitalizations to 87, the DSHS said. More than 13% of cases have resulted in hospitalizations, and two children, an 8-year-old girl and a 6-year-old girl, died after contracting the virus.

The DSHS estimates that fewer than 10 of the Texans who have contracted measles — less than 1% of the total — are actively infectious. An individual may be infectious up to four days before a rash appears and up to four days after it’s gone.

Texas has also seen 30 measles cases in 2025 that are not connected to the outbreak, most of them associated with international travel, according to the DSHS. Four have been in Harris County, one was in Fort Bend County and one was in Brazoria County.

Ten of the 17 new cases reported on Tuesday are in El Paso County, which has now seen 32 cases associated with the outbreak.

Gaines County reported three new cases. The county has seen the lion’s share of infections with 396 in total, nearly 60% of all cases associated with the outbreak.

Lamar County also reported three new cases, increasing its total to 17. Lubbock County reported one new case, bringing its total to 48.

The DSHS said there is ongoing measles transmission in 10 counties: Cochran, Dallam, Dawson, Gaines, Garza, Lynn, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

Of the 663 cases in Texas, 200 have been in children younger than 5 years old and 245 have been in children and teens between 5 and 17, according to the DSHS.

Only 28 cases — about 4% of all cases associated with the outbreak — have been in people who received at least one dose of MMR vaccine prior to an infection.

The DMN has more.

Ten counties remain under “ongoing measles transmission” status: Cochran, Dallam, Dawson, Gaines, Garza, Lynn, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

The state’s update does not include a confirmed measles case in Collin County reported by health officials on April 23. That case, which involved a student who attends Willow Springs Middle School in Lucas — part of the Lovejoy Independent School District — is this year’s first instance of measles in a child in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. It was not immediately clear whether the child’s measles case was connected to the ongoing outbreak that began in Gaines County in West Texas.

Earlier this month, an adult in Rockwall County who had recently traveled to West Texas tested positive for measles. It was not immediately clear if this person’s illness is connected to the outbreak, according to a public health alert issued by the county’s health authority.

The first confirmed measles case in Rockwall County, which was reported in late February, is not believed to be connected to the West Texas outbreak either.

Measles cases in Oklahoma and Mexico are linked to the West Texas outbreak. Tuesday’s update does not include the rise of viral cases in these two states. New Mexico reported 66 cases as of April 25, and Oklahoma reported 12 cases as of Tuesday. Together with Texas, the measles outbreak has grown to 741 cases.

That’s all I’ve got for now. I continue to be worried about El Paso, and until further notice I’m now worried about Collin County. I hope my fears are overblown.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

School districts have those “our insurance is too expensive” blues

Posted on April 30, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Hopefully, the Lege will do something to help.

Hurricane Harvey ravaged the Port Aransas Independent School District when it hit in 2017, damaging every classroom and prompting weeks-long school closures. The district is still facing ripple effects today, but in a new form: its insurance costs have skyrocketed, forcing superintendent Sharon McKinney to choose between giving teachers raises and insuring school buildings.

School districts across Texas have struggled to keep up with rising property insurance costs as severe weather batters school buildings. Insurance costs for districts have increased by 44% statewide since 2020, according to financial data from the Texas Education Agency.

Now, state lawmakers are considering two proposals to help offset these costs – at least in coastal counties, where the crisis is particularly acute.

A provision in House Bill 2, the major school finance package that passed the House last week, would reimburse school districts in the 14 coastal counties covered by the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association, the safety net insurance plan, for property insurance increases above the state average.

And a bill filed by state Rep. Todd Hunter, a Corpus Christi Republican, would give districts in coastal counties a credit against recapture payments for wind and hail coverage. Hunter’s bill covers Tier 1 and 2 counties, which would include Harris County and Houston ISD. (Because it includes Tier 1 only, the provision in HB 2 excludes Harris County.)

“You don’t want education to suffer because you’re worried about getting money to cover buildings for the kids,” Hunter said in an interview.

At the hearing on Hunter’s bill, school superintendents from three districts near Corpus Christi told lawmakers that high insurance costs have restricted funds that could be used to pay teachers and provide services for students.

In Port Aransas, McKinney said, the school district now spends 10% of its $10 million annual budget paying for property insurance. In Rockport, the cost to insure school buildings has nearly tripled from $1 million in 2019 to $2.8 million in 2024, said Rockport-Fulton ISD superintendent Lesley Austin.

Austin said Hunter’s bill “would honor the original intent of recapture” by not imposing “hardship because of where we’re located.”

Many school districts are reducing coverage in order to keep costs down, which increases risk for taxpayers. “This is not a strategy, it’s desperation,” Austin said in the hearing.

[…]

State Sen. José Menéndez, a Democrat from San Antonio, filed a bill directing the State Office of Risk Management to study the costs of insuring public school property and to “develop a statewide strategy” to lower those costs. The bill hasn’t been heard in committee, but Hunter said the issue should be studied.

It’s unclear how much Hunter’s bill would cost the state due to “insufficient data” about how much school districts are currently paying for windstorm and hail insurance, according to the fiscal note by the nonpartisan Legislative Budget Board.

An analysis by the nonprofit Texas Association of School Business Officials estimated that the reimbursement provision in HB 2 would cost the state $170 million over the coming biennium.

These bills are a decent response and should make a difference, if they pass. You can’t take anything for granted in the Legislature, especially for things that aren’t wingnut-approved agenda items. Even widely popular things can get nuked by the nihilists if they’re feeling bored or cranky. It would be nice if the Lege spent some time working on the root causes of the insurance premium problem, but that would mean first acknowledging climate change, and we know how likely that is. At least they’re willing to deal with the consequences, for now.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

One more thing about microtransit in the Heights

Posted on April 30, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

This is from the latest edition of the Woodland Heights Civic Association newsletter, which I got in my inbox late on Friday.

METRO recently announced a new micro-transit service (in partnership with the City of Houston and Evolve Houston) to provide an all-electric METRO Community Connector to the Heights.

In a recent article in The Leader,  METRO Chair Elizabeth Gonzalez Brock notes,  “This new service is already transforming transit and people’s lives by providing direct access to buses and trains and ultimately meets essential needs like attending wellness appointments or getting to the grocery store.”

The service is supposed to bridge the gap between ‘the first and last mile’ of a rider’s trip, where transit access is challenging. With the addition of the North and South Heights Zones the service is now available in five neighborhoods. The other service areas included in this program include the  Downtown, Second Ward, and Third Ward Zones.

On its website, METRO touts climate-friendly, electric vehicles with seating up to five passengers that travel within a designated zone. To schedule the service, would-be riders must download the Ride Circuit app and request their ride. In the Heights area, two routes are available, which intersect with each other: Heights North and Heights South.

The Heights North route is loosely bound by 12th Street on the south, Alexandria on the west, 25th and Link on the North, and Cordell Street on the west side. On the east, it is bounded by Walton to Calvacade under 45 to Fulton and the METRO Red Line off to Link Road and Cavalcade, then back to Cordell Street.

The Heights South route is loosely bound on the South by White Oak, on the west by Yale, on the North by 12th Street, on the east by North Main to Beauchamp, and then back to White Oak to Quitman, which will take you to the Red Line that intersects with North Main.

The service is available to specific neighborhoods, and METRO states these routes are in response to the community’s need for convenient access to public transit. The service is supposed to bridge the gap between ‘the first and last mile’ of a riders trip where transit access is challenging.

Climate-friendly, electric vehicles that can seat up to 5 passengers operate within a defined zone. A rider wishing to use the service must download the Ride Circuit app to request a ride anywhere in your designated coverage area. In the general Heights area, there are two routes available for Heights residents, Heights North and Heights South.

Metro’s Community Connector service is available through a partnership with the City of Houston and Evolve Houston.

We asked Evolve Houston a few questions we’d heard from neighbors regarding their service, Evan Hargrove, Senior Program Manager for Evolve Houston responded.

1. When the Woodland Heights neighborhood was built as one of Houston’s first suburbs, the streetcar line ran along Houston Avenue, ending at Bayland. Is there a reason why the dividing line in the South Heights route is on Beauchamp Avenue instead of Houston Avenue?

“Yes, our top priority is safety for both passengers and drivers. We intentionally avoided streets in close proximity to highways or feeder roads, which is why Houston Avenue, bordering the freeway, was excluded from this first version of the zone.

That said, the zone is flexible and not permanent. We continuously evaluate pick-up and drop-off data and adjust the zone as needed. If we see consistent feedback or usage trends near Houston Avenue that improve access to METRO Rail and bus stops, we’ll absolutely consider updating the boundaries.

2. Your FAQs mention that users can request rides within the designated area. Can users request specific pick-up and drop-off points, like from their home to their office? Or does it have to be a METRO stop or transit point?

“Yes, you can request pick-up and drop-off at any location within the service zone. For example, if you live near Jeni’s Ice Cream on 19th Street and want to go to the public library on Heights Boulevard, you can use the shuttle to get there directly.

While the entire zone is available for travel, please note that trips going to or from METRO Rail and bus stops may have reduced wait times due to our routing priorities.”

3. Is there an option for people who don’t have access to the Ride Circuit app? Or is the service only available through the app?

“The service is currently app-based, but if someone doesn’t have the Ride Circuit app, another person (such as a family member or caregiver) can book the ride on their behalf.

4. What led to the expansion into the Heights area, and are additional expansions planned?

“The Community Connector is a pilot program designed to test and learn from various service zones. Each area serves a different community with unique needs—Heights is very different from Downtown, Third Ward, or Second Ward, and that’s intentional. Expanding to the Heights allows us to gather insights, understand usage patterns, and evaluate demand. As we collect data and receive community feedback (which is incredibly valuable), we can improve the service and explore additional zones. If you or others have suggestions or feedback, please feel free to reach us at communityconnector@evolvehouston.org – we truly welcome and appreciate it.”

See here and here for the background. At least we know Metro has made some attempt to communicate about this service to at least part of the area it’s now serving. I’ve been thinking about this a lot, and I have reacted as strongly as I have to this news is 1) I don’t think the Heights is the right place to be testing this out, whatever the vision of it is, because we’re a wealthy neighborhood that is mostly residential and is very well served by existing transit, and 2) I remain mad that such a small and limited new service is what this Metro board has decided to roll out to us rather than the much larger and more ambitious projects that we the voters approved in 2019 that would move a whole lot more people around and serve a much larger portion of Harris County. I can’t escape the feeling that this little shuttle, which is not allowed to drive on main roads because it’s not safe for it to do so, is intended as a low-end substitute for Uber and Lyft. That’s not what public transit is supposed to be for. We deserve so much better.

(Note: Since the publication of the previous post, I’ve seen the microtransit shuttle parked in the neighborhood, with the driver inside or leaning up against the vehicle outside, two more times. I have not seen it in motion since the first time I saw it.)

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Two action items

Posted on April 30, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Wanted to pass along a couple of notices of action items for those of you looking for something to do this week. Item #1, from the inbox:

On Thursday, May 1, 2025, attorneys, judges, law students, and others committed to the rule of law will gather to stand for the rule of law. Lawyers will reaffirm the oaths they took to support the Constitution.

In Houston, this will be a brief rally at 12pm at the Jury Assembly Plaza, 1200 block of Franklin Street between Fannin and San Jacinto.

Background
In response to serious threats to the justice system from the executive branch of the federal government, lawyers, judges, law students, and others will gather to demonstrate a commitment to the principles of judicial independence and the independence of the legal profession as critical elements of the democratic process.

Of particular concern to Houston lawyers are the administration’s defiance of multiple court orders and arrests of judges, and threats against law firms, including the Executive Order targeting a Houston-based litigation firm.

More details including day-of-event contacts for English and Spanish outlets as well as logistics in the attached document.

Here’s the attached file, which has a lot more information. This is an action by and for lawyers, but you don’t have to be a lawyer to participate. Just someone who respects the rule of law and wants to see that upheld. This is a national day of action, so you don’t have to be in Houston, either. Look for an event near you.

Item #2, also from the inbox:

Press Conference: Victims of Texas’ Cash Bail System Speak Out Ahead of Governor’s Planned Round Table and Press Conference

WHAT:
People who have been negatively impacted by the state’s cash bail system will join the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, Texas Organizing Project, Pure Justice, and the Texas Civil Rights Project at a press conference ahead of the governor’s round table and press conference on so-called “bail reform.”

Victims and family members will share their personal experiences when they or their loved ones were locked up in jail for long periods of time, simply because they were unable to pay bail.

Criminal justice organizations will discuss the unconstitutionality of Senate Joint Resolution 1/ House Joint Resolution 16, and their continued opposition to S.J.R. 5/ H.J.R. 15 and Senate Bill 9/ House Bill 75 as they are currently written. If passed, these bills would make it easier to eliminate due process for everyone accused of a crime at a time when the Trump administration is unfairly painting people as criminals without evidence. The group is calling on state lawmakers to block or amend these bills and pass meaningful bail reform.

WHO:

Nick Hudson (he/him), senior policy and advocacy strategist, ACLU of Texas
Nick designs, supports, and manages strategic campaigns to reduce arrests, combat police violence, decrease mass incarceration, end wealth-based detention, and reduce racial disparities throughout the justice system.

Synnachia Mcqueen (he/him), community leader with the Texas Organizing Project
Synnachia was arrested for a crime he did not commit. When he requested bail, the court denied it, issuing a “no bond” order because he was on probation. As a result of this blanket denial, he lost his job, his family, his friends, and the ability to be a present father to his three daughters.

Sarah Knight (she/her), mother of Jaleen Anderson
Sarah’s son died in a for-profit Louisiana prison where Harris County sent him after denying him bail.

Fawnya Doiron (she/her), mother of Zach
Fawnya’s son Zach died after a brutal assault in the Harris County Jail while he was being held due to unaffordable bail stemming from a drug charge.

WHEN:
Wednesday, April 30, 2025 at 11:30 a.m. CT.

WHERE:
Midtown Park
At the corner of Anita Street and Main Street
2811 Travis Street
Houston, TX 77006

That’s today, I only got the email yesterday afternoon. Greg Abbott is out there trashing judges because he doesn’t care about any of this. Let’s make voices other than his be heard.

If you can’t make it to that event, there are other ways to get involved and make your voice heard on this, as my blogging colleague Neil Aquino documents. Abbott is singing from the Trumpian songbook, and he’s got help. We have the numbers to counter him and the high ground to stake out. Please do what you can.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bird flu is all around us

Posted on April 29, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Still not human to human transmissible. But that may not be the case forever.

Texas health and wildlife officials have detected avian flu in mammals including skunks, raccoons, foxes and domestic cats across six counties in the state’s Panhandle region.

The discovery, which follows the revelation that dairy cows and humans have both tested positive for the virus, suggests it’s moving to a new stage of contagion. The development also comes as the Trump White House moves ahead on drastic cuts to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which oversees efforts to contain disease outbreaks.

The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), the Department of State Health Services and the Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Lab found the new infections among mammals in Deaf Smith, Hansford, Lubbock, Ochiltree, Parmer and Randall counties. Data shows that transmission among mammals primarily happens when they eat infected animal carcasses, state officials said, although “mammal-to-mammal transmission is possible.”

Avian flu has already decimated U.S. poultry flocks, sending egg prices through the roof. To date, more than 168 million chickens have died or been killed due to the outbreak.

Angela Rasmussen, a U.S. virologist working in Canada, told CBS News program 60 Minutes on Sunday that the virus’ jump from chickens to other mammals suggests there’s reason for concern that continuing evolution could enable it to jump between humans.

“The fact that this virus can infect so many different types of mammals is a huge concern in terms of its ability to infect people,” Rasmussen said.

While the Biden administration was slow to take action to contain the spread of avian flu, Rasmussen told 60 Minutes that the Trump White House appears to be on an even worse trajectory due to its ongoing cuts at the CDC.

“Many of the people who were working on this, at least at CDC, have — have been fired from the federal government,” Rasmussen said. “So the influenza division at CDC has been decimated, and in fact, there is a communications ban that has been put on these federal workers.”

TPWD officials urged Texans working in wildlife rehabilitation to be cautious when intaking wild animals and for people to take protective measures such as donning gloves and face masks if they handle wild animals. Those who think they have encountered wild animals with avian flu should contact a TPWD wildlife biologist, they added.

See here, here, and here for some background. The risk right now for most of us is pretty miniscule – basically, stay away from animals that aren’t pets, with some allowance for livestock and zoo animals, and you’re fine. But the flu evolves and so that could change, and right now the people that are best suited to track this are not able to do their jobs to the fullest extent. That’s a big risk, and it’s a risk that the federal government doesn’t even recognize. Hope for the best, there’s not a whole lot else we can do at this time.

Posted in Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Starbase Soon-To-Be-A-City

Posted on April 29, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

I guess we’re all assuming this will pass.

Angela Piazza/USA TODAY NETWORK via REUTERS

Nearly 10 years after SpaceX, Elon Musk’s effort to colonize Mars, began operating in a small community in Cameron County just a few miles inland of the Gulf Coast, employees who live there and other residents will vote next month to incorporate their Starbase community as Texas’ newest city.

If the majority of them vote yes on May 3, the leaders they elect at the same time will have the responsibility of creating a city from the ground up.

What does it take to have a fully functioning city?

A few of Starbase’s first steps as a newborn city can be anticipated because state law sets certain requirements for raising and spending public money and how governing bodies can operate.

Texas generally gives municipalities a lot of discretion on how to manage and govern themselves, according to Alan Bojorquez, an attorney who specializes in city governance.

“The reality is, Texas cities under the law are not required to do much,” Bojorquez said.

He emphasized that much of what the new city of Starbase will do will ultimately depend on what services and programs city officials and residents want the city to provide.

See here for the background, and read on to see the things that cities are required to do. I’m going to guess that 1) Starbase City will do the bare minimum of those things, at least at first, and 2) yes, this will indeed pass, likely be a wide margin. For those of you who live there, and especially those of you who live there and are skeptical about this whole thing, I wish you the best.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

I got those unwanted speed trap blues

Posted on April 29, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Fascinating.

Daragh John Carter hates a speed trap near his home so much he began posting about it on Facebook before eventually escalating to standing near it and warning passing motorists it was coming.

His actions frustrated a Houston police officer enough that Carter was cited for jaywalking, with the traffic police noting he was the resident who posted about the speed trap on Facebook. Rather than pay the fine, Carter has opted to contest the tickets in court, where a trial is tentatively set for April 29, he said.

“I have read the sections of the Texas Transportation Code … and I do not believe I violated either one of them,” he said. “No different than if I was cited for speeding, but knew I was driving at or below the speed limit.”

What might at first glance seem like a sympathetic quixotic quest to anyone who’s ever gotten a municipal ticket is actually part of larger, more sweeping conversations in public safety on how to balance desire for safer streets with the cost-intensive speed traps that can be ripe for abuse and how the city might find savings as it stares down a $330 million municipal deficit while overtime spending in the police department spikes each year.

Carter said the citations were the culmination of a growing dispute in his neighborhood over a speed trap along TC Jester Boulevard.

Carter said he’s always objected to the trap because even if you’re watching your speed, it’s easy to break the posted 35mph speed limit along that stretch of road. The area in question is near the bottom of a hill, where a driver might eclipse the speed limit even if carefully monitoring their surroundings, Carter said.

“The reason HPD runs radar there is that it’s like shooting fish in a barrel,” he said.

Jodi Silva, a spokeswoman for the Houston Police Department, said the department set up the traffic enforcement in response to growing concern from nearby residents about dangerous driving. The officer’s job is to issue citations in areas that are of particular concern.

Soon after Carter became frustrated with the speed trap, he said he began posting in the neighborhood Facebook group warning people about it. Then he stood down the hill from the traffic patrol and telling passing motorists, he said.

But Carter’s decision soon drew the ire of one of the officers orchestrating the speed trap, Carter said. That officer, Matthew Davis, tracked down Carter and wrote out a citation for jaywalking after telling him he was interfering with a police investigation, Carter said. On the citation, Davis also mentioned that Carter had been the one posting on Facebook.

There’s more, so read the rest. I can think of plenty of places in Houston where I’d love to see a cop busting speeders – hell, Studewood between White Oak and 11th is often a racetrack. We can all think of road stretches where the speeding is egregious and dangerous, and as such my initial reaction to this was “what the hell is this guy complaining about”. But now I get it, and as you can see from the pictures there’s nothing but the road where that speed trap is, so there’s much less of a threat to pedestrians, children playing in yards, and so on, thus lessening the safety impact. And that citation doesn’t sound like jaywalking to me either, it sounds more like spite. So go ahead and fight it. There’s an April 29 court date. I’ll be interested to see how that goes.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Terry Virts

Posted on April 28, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

We may have an astronaut candidate for Senate.

Terry Virts (Credit: REUTERS/Ivan Sekretarev/Pool)

In the latest sign that Democrats are turning a new leaf after their dismal 2024 defeat, astronaut and political neophyte Terry Virts is planning to launch a run for the US Senate in Texas, GZERO Media has learned. He plans to challenge incumbent Sen. John Cornyn, a Republican, according to a Democratic operative familiar with the race. Virts’ pending announcement comes as former Rep. Colin Allred, a fellow Democrat, is reportedly planning another Senate bid, just six months after his eight-point loss to Republican Sen. Ted Cruz.

The latest internal battle. Whether it’s young versus old, or pro-fight versus pro-fold, the Democratic Party is undergoing an identity crisis following US President Donald Trump’s resurgent victory in November. If Virts indeed runs, it will likely set up a primary with Allred, in what would be another battle between the old guard and the upstarts.

Virts didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment from GZERO Media.

Who is Virts? Born in Baltimore, the 57-year-old astronaut first learned how to fly at the Air Force Academy in Colorado, graduating in 1989. He served for another decade in the US military, where he flew F-16s, before joining NASA in 2000 – the Johnson Space Center is based in Houston, creating his Texas links. He retired 16 years later. Over the last decade, Virts has been more of a talking head, setting up a podcast that ran for two years and even appearing on the Joe Rogan Experience in 2020 – take that, Kamala Harris. He’s now built a solid social media following.

See here for some background. I go into this knowing nothing about Terry Virts. It’s important to remember that there’s a gap between “planning to launch” and actually running – not all campaigns get off the ground. But it’s encouraging that we’ve got interesting people at least taking a serious look. I look forward to welcoming him to the race. Link via The Downballot.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

San Marcos and Austin marijuana ordinances struck down

Posted on April 28, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Strike one.

A state appeals court has shot down a voter-approved ordinance that decriminalized marijuana in San Marcos.

The Fifteenth Court of Appeals last week overturned a ruling that denied a temporary injunction to block the law’s enforcement in the city, according to a report from the Texas Tribune.

In the ruling, Judge April Farris cited that state law makes marijuana possession a criminal offense.

Over 80% of San Marcos voters approved the ordinance, Proposition A, in 2022.

After Proposition A was passed, the San Marcos Police Department was no longer able to:

  • Issue citations for possession of drug residue or paraphernalia
  • Arrest or cite people for misdemeanor possession of marijuana up to four ounces, unless it’s part of a felony investigation
  • Use city funds or personnel to test a substance’s THC levels
  • Cite the odor of marijuana or hemp as probable cause to search

The ordinance only applied to the San Marcos Police Department; other law enforcement agencies in the area were exempt.

Attorney General Ken Paxton sued San Marcos in early 2024 over the marijuana decriminalization ordinance — along with four other Texas cities that had similar ordinances or policies, including Austin, Killeen, Denton and Elgin.

See here for the background. Here’s strike two.

A Texas appeals court ruled Thursday that the City of Austin cannot enforce its law that prohibits police from citing and arresting people for carrying a small amount of marijuana. This is the second time this month that the appeals court has ruled in favor of the state against ordinances that decriminalize marijuana.

The state’s 15th Court of Appeals overturned the decision by Travis County District Judge Jan Soifer, who had dismissed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit against Austin last year, ruling that there was no legal justification to try the case. The court determined the city law “abused its discretion” by putting up any barrier to the full enforcement of drug-related laws.

Last week, this same court overturned a lower court ruling that denied a temporary injunction to prevent the City of San Marcos from enforcing its voter-approved ordinance to decriminalize marijuana because it conflicts with current state law.

“Consistent with the City of San Marcos, we conclude that the ordinance in this case is also preempted by state law,” according to the ruling about Austin’s ordinance penned by Judge Scott Field.

This is another blow to the progressive drug movement that swept into various cities across the state. Austin Mayor Pro Tem Vanessa Fuentes called the ruling another example of the state stepping on local decisions.

“This court ruling is a huge letdown. Austin voters made their voices loud and clear in 2022, and instead of respecting that, the State has chosen to ignore their will,” Fuentes said.

[…]

Hays County District Judge Sherri Tibbe dismissed Paxton’s lawsuit, upholding the argument that the state was not injured when San Marcos reduced arrests for misdemeanor marijuana possession and that it allowed for resources to be used for higher-priority public safety needs.

The Office of the Attorney General appealed this decision. In February, the case was assigned to the 15th Court of Appeals, where the state’s attorneys argued that the San Marcos ordinance obstructed the enforcement of state drug laws. The city argued the policy was voter-driven, but the court disagreed, granting the temporary injunction while litigation continues.

Travis County District Judge Jan Soifer dismissed Paxton’s lawsuit against Austin last year, ruling there was no legal justification to try the case.

Both Tibbe and Soifer’s rulings have now been overturned by the 15th Court of Appeals.

This puts the fate of the ordinances in doubt and some cities have already given up on trying to fight the state.

Paxton’s lawsuit against Elgin was resolved last summer via consent decree, meaning neither side is claiming guilt or liability but has come to an agreement.

In the North Texas suburb of Denton, where voters approved decriminalization by more than 70%, the implementation of a marijuana decriminalization ordinance has stalled after City Manager Sara Hensley argued it couldn’t be enforced since it conflicted with state law.

The case against Killeen, which was filed in Bell County a year ago, is still pending.

See here for more on the original lawsuits, and here for more on the dismissal of the Austin case. We know that other cities, including Dallas, passed similar ordinances last year. I cannot see any way that they are ever enforced. That’s strike three.

I sympathize greatly with the organizers who pushed these initiatives and the people who voted for them. Texas’ stringent anti-marijuana laws are archaic and harmful, and they need to be greatly relaxed. Efforts like these, run by Ground Game Texas, have been a response to the intransigence of state legislators and Dan Patrick. There was a time when cities would freely go their own way on a wide variety of matters, citing “local control” as the guiding principle. But Republicans no longer care about local control, because they have control of the state government and they will brook no dissent from the decadent liberal cities. Passing these local decriminalization ordinances may feel like a victory, but it’s all chalk art on a sidewalk just before a thunderstorm. The only way to achieve this kind of needed progress is a complete change of state government. That’s an enormous challenge, to say the least. But it couldn’t be clearer that there aren’t any workarounds. This strategy is dead. We can complain all we want about it, but that won’t change anything. Change who runs the state, or we keep getting what we’ve been getting, and what that is will keep getting worse. Accept it and we can move forward.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How much does Houston want to piss off its neighbors?

Posted on April 28, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

This is me, shaking my head.

Mayor John Whitmire

A proposal to cut Houston in on revenue generated through the county’s toll roads is threatening the city’s relationship with county officials and neighboring jurisdictions.

The legislation making its way through both the Texas House as House Bill 5177 and Senate as Senate Bill 2722 would allocate millions of dollars generated through the Harris County Toll Road Authority to the City of Houston. The funds have traditionally gone to the county, which has used them for various mobility projects and improvements throughout the 34 cities and hundreds of miles of unincorporated land that make up its four precincts.

Harris County commissioners and local officials in cities such as Friendswood and Pearland see the legislation as a “cash bailout” for Houston’s projected budget deficit.

“Let’s be clear, this is a bailout bill, not a transportation bill,” Commissioner Lesley Briones said at a House Committee hearing Thursday evening. “It sets bad precedent. It’s based on bad policy, and it jeopardizes regional partnerships.”

But Mayor John Whitmire said 60% of the county’s toll roads are within city limits and its responsible for providing emergency services for those roads. He argued that, since Houston is responsible for providing emergency services for the toll roads that run through the city, it should be entitled to its slice of the pie.

“Houston spends millions of dollars a year supporting the toll road operation. Have for 50 years. This should have been a discussion when the toll road was created back in the early ’70s,” Whitmire said. “The toll road authority is running a $300 million surplus, and I’m sitting here with a lean budget. I need more police and fire.”

Critics, such as Harris County Fire Marshal Laurie Christensen, who testified during Thursday’s hearing, pointed to the many fire departments that serve cities other than Houston as well as the Emergency Service Districts, volunteer departments and constables that assist in responding to calls outside Houston.

Although Whitmire said he supports the legislation, he said he was not involved in drafting it. Republican state Sen. Paul Bettencourt authored the first version of the bill.

“I was asked if I could use a reasonable amount — to be determined by the legislature — for public safety inside Houston,” Whitmire said. “It would be irresponsible not to accept an offer to improve Houston public safety.”

[…]

It’s a bold step, [political analyst Nancy] Sims said, and one that could ultimately harm the city in the long term. County officials have previously worked with the city on various infrastructure projects, which they may not be as inclined to do should their funding be cut.

“I think in the long term, he’s putting additional funding at risk by taking on people he’s cooperated well with over the last year,” Sims said. “If they’re genuinely upset over this, then they may say, ‘Well, look, you got our road money. We don’t need to help you build any more roads.'”

Whitmire said he isn’t concerned by potential retaliation from county officials, who he insisted he was “the best of friends” with. He said that, since each of the four commissioners also represent a portion of Houston, it’s in their best interest to continue cooperating with him.

Commissioners, on the other hand, are unified in their opposition to the legislation. Although Briones said during Thursday’s hearing that she has enormous respect for Whitmire, she suggested the county would be unable to continue funding some of the projects it partnered with Houston to complete.

See here for some background. I do not understand this strategy. I do not understand why Whitmire feels the need to lie about how much Houston actually does spend on emergency response on the toll roads. I do not understand why he wouldn’t just take those concerns to his “best friends” on Commissioners Court rather than let an enemy like Paul Bettencourt shove this down their throats. Is that how he treated his “best friends” in the Senate back in the day? I do not understand why you would piss off people with whom you do want to do constructive work, or why you would hamper their financial ability to work with you in the future. I do not understand why we’re not talking about trying to get assistance from the state on fixing our massive and expensive water infrastructure issues, which would greatly benefit all of us and might even make selling our excess water to the state to help them with their water problems more feasible. If there’s some grand eleven-dimension chess strategy to this, I just do not see it.

I mean look, it’s not that long ago that I was loudly and frequently complaining about how Harris County directed a disproportionate amount of its resources towards lightly populated areas outside Houston, and never seemed to care all that much about the state of the city even as it was more than half the county’s population. It’s not that long ago that we had a Commissioner that was more obsessed with a soapbox derby track in Hockley than anything in Houston. That was then, this is now. Harris County has had a better relationship with Houston for several years, starting with Judge Ed Emmett and his willingness to work with Mayor Parker, and accelerating after Democrats became the majority on the Court. The city is in a much better place with the county, at least when we’re not wantonly tearing out infrastructure that had been built by the county. Why would we want to jeopardize that? Why would someone who claims his ability to work with other politicians is an unparalleled strength for the city because of his fifty-year stint in the Legislature act that way? Make it make sense.

Posted in That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Weekend link dump for April 27

Posted on April 27, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

“It’s become this thing that I wish it was not there. What’s going through this guy’s mind? He said I was lying. I’m not lying. He said I begged him to be in the movie, but there’s no world I would ever beg a non-actor to be in a movie. But we were desperate to get the Plaza Hotel.”

“Inside Canada’s Northern Super League: A new soccer competition created by players for players”.

“I’ve had a lot more success after leaving the incel community behind and just realizing that your life isn’t really all that hopeless. You realize, ‘I believed this for so long, how many years of my life did I lose?’”

“Maybe the thing that most endangers the tradition of throwing eggs at people to express disapproval is not the price of eggs. It’s actually the price of tech—the decreasing price of tech. So it’s not that we have an egg shortage, we have a privacy shortage.”

“Here’s what I envision – a small group of researchers and lawyers, let’s call them the DOJ in Exile. This small office I’ve created pulls together all these stories and all those to come. My team orders them into things that are awful but simply not part of the criminal law, those that could prosecuted with creative but serious-minded uses of available statutes and those which appear to involve straightforward criminal conduct. Then they break them down into specific statutes. They name names. They can produce what amount to indictments in waiting. I could go through many more permutations here. But the concept and question is what would a real Justice Department be doing right now? Since it’s not a real Justice Department with the ability to compel testimony, make arrests and bring criminal charges we don’t have the need for secrecy. You can discuss and publicize what you’re finding.”

RIP, Pope Francis, the first non-European head of the Roman Catholic Church in more than a millennium. He changed a lot about the Church. I hope the next Pope carries on his mission.

“We have a lot of questions about what was in Kristi Noem’s stolen purse“.

“Meghan Markle has been embroiled in a plagiarism dispute after a British author described “striking similarities” between her own books and a proposal by Markle for a children’s TV show.”

“At this point I think it’s safe to say that any lazy, absurd, ridiculous-seeming premise for how the evil conspirators wind up accidentally revealing their plot to the protagonist has to be acceptable as a real possibility. Go ahead and try to come up with some plot device that seems too incompetent or too recklessly dumb for the current administration. I don’t think you can.”

“Harvard sued the Trump administration in federal court on Monday over its multibillion dollar cuts to the University’s research funding, accusing the White House of undertaking an arbitrary and unconstitutional campaign to “punish Harvard for protecting its constitutional rights.””

“A lot of people will respond by saying ‘he didn’t mean autistic people like you.’ But that doesn’t make it any better.”

“Talking to the guy is sometimes like listening to really rusty nails on a chalkboard. He’s just the most irritating person I’ve ever had to deal with, and that is saying something.”

“To protect yourself, more so now than ever, I think it is a great idea to take a burner phone, to not take your technology, to not take anything on your technology that you would be afraid of any government entity knowing or having. The concept of privacy is completely different when you enter the United States.”

Womp womp. Too bad, so sad.

“And once it’s normal, why not go along with it? To resist would be such a hassle, a distraction even, from the cool good shit like winning a World Series. Evil seems incongruous with the pomp silliness of the ceremony; the president cracking dumb jokes in an ostentatious room with curtains that make the color gold seem complicit. Would the administration really make everything so loud and shiny if they were doing something worth being ashamed of? This is the problem with people who feel no shame.”

“Democrats Need to Make Republicans Fear the Consequences of Attempting a Dictatorship”. The DOJ In Exile project seems like a good way to accomplish at least some of that.

“9 ways Capitol rioters got a better deal than wrongfully deported dad”.

Look, I’m not saying that JD Vance killed the Pope, but I’m not not saying it, either.

Three Men and a Baby, also known as the Sean Astin story.

“Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently ordered modifications to a room next to the Pentagon press briefing room to retrofit it with a makeup studio that can be used to prepare for television appearances, multiple sources told CBS News.”

“All of this is, to put it mildly, a humiliating climb down for the President.”

RIP, Steve McMichael, Hall of Fame lineman mostly for the Chicago Bears, who was on the 1985 Super Bowl champion team.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 1 Comment

Harris County sues over public health funding cuts

Posted on April 27, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Keep fighting.

Harris County Attorney Christian D. Menefee and officials from three other states sued the Trump administration Thursday over its decision to rescind $11 billion in public health funding for state and local health departments.

The decision to pull back the funds affects about $20 million that had been allocated to Harris County through a series of grant programs set up in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the lawsuit. Harris County has used the grants to establish a wastewater surveillance program, train community health workers and offer vaccines to the community.

“Harris County was set to receive millions of dollars to support critical public health services—programs that help us detect and prevent disease outbreaks, run vaccination clinics, and keep our residents healthy,” Menefee said in a news release.

Officials from Nashville, Tenn.; Columbus, Ohio; Kansas City, Mo.; and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees joined Harris County in filing the lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C.

Attorneys general and other officials from 23 states filed a similar lawsuit over the cuts earlier this month in federal court in Rhode Island. That suit argues the Trump administration did not provide facts to support the cuts, and says they will result in “serious harm to public health.”

The Trump administration argued the funds are no longer necessary because the COVID-19 pandemic is over. But Menefee said the money is essential to combating other public health threats such as the ongoing measles outbreak, which has sickened more than 600 people in Texas.

See here and here for some background, and here for a copy of the press release. Harris County had signed on to an amicus brief in support of a previous lawsuit over NIH cuts. As the story mentions, these cuts have also cost the Houston Health Department up to $42 million in grant funding, which would be a significant blow. The stakes here are high.

I should note, for what it’s worth, that the Trumpsters have been retreating from some of the fights it had picked. They also quickly caved after the filing of a lawsuit over refugee health grants. No guarantee we’ll get that kind of outcome here, but it is increasingly the case that fighting back is a winning move. Always good to see that being practiced here.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What is this microtransit for, anyway?

Posted on April 27, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Since I first blogged about the arrival of those Evolve Houston microtransit shuttles in the Heights a week or so ago, I have seen one of those shuttles three times. The first time it was in motion and presumably in use, turning from Pecore onto Beauchamp. The other two times it was parked on the street near my house, with the driver inside. I was out for a walk the first time I saw the shuttle sitting there, and since the driver’s window was down, I went over and said hello to him, and asked him if he was waiting for a passenger. He said no, he had been told to park and talk up the shuttles to whoever came by; basically, he and the shuttle were serving as advertisements for the service. I asked if he had given any rides so far that day (it was around lunchtime) and he said no. I thanked him and wished him well and went on my way.

I was driving the second time I saw the parked shuttle, a couple of days later, so I didn’t have the chance to talk to the driver. I assume he was following the same instructions as before but can’t confirm that. The shuttle itself is of course its own advertisement for the service, whether it’s in motion or at rest, but I do wonder how much other publicity Metro has given it and its new expansion of that service. They did tweet and post to Facebook about it, a couple of days before I saw the Chron story and Facebook group post that alerted me, but I didn’t see either of those posts until I went looking for them. I didn’t see anyone share it on their own wall or Twitter feed. Maybe the next email from our civic association will mention it, we’ll see. Metro could have done more to make the people who might use this thing know that it exists, is what I’m saying.

(Update: After drafting this post, I saw another parked shuttle with the driver sitting inside, on Friday in the parking lot of the strip center on Yale between 19th and 20th.)

The social media posts did lead me to Metro’s “community connectors” page, and that led me in turn to more questions about this service. First, the actual area served is smaller than I originally thought, with the south zone being smaller than the north zone, only extending as far west as Yale. The North Zone approaches Shepherd but stops a block east of it, which suggests to me that these shuttles are not safe to drive on a busier and higher-speed road like that. It has a couple of other effects that I’ll get to in a minute.

One of the stated purposes of this microtransit initiative (that no one asked for) is to increase ridership. We don’t know (because Metro won’t tell us) how many people are using these shuttles, but I take that to mean that it will help people get from their homes to Metro’s main services and/or from the bus and light rail lines to other destinations. Solving the “last mile” problem for folks who may need it, in other words. I count seven bus lines that run through “the Heights”, all of which go through or border on those microtransit areas (26, 27, 30, 40, 44, 56, 66) – you’re never more than a half mile away from a bus stop, which sort of limits the usefulness of the shuttles. On the plus side, both the Quitman and Cavalcade light rail stops are included, so that’s good. I suspect those will be popular destinations for riders.

Beyond getting a ride to the light rail stations, where else might a shuttle rider want to go? This is where I struggle to understand Metro’s purpose in deploying this to the Heights. Where would one take this shuttle, given that it’s daytime only (and thus not an option for, say, going to a restaurant with limited parking or the Heights Theater)? You could go to the HEB on Shepherd, if there’s an accessible entrance from the side, but not to the Kroger on Shepherd and 11th or the one on Studemont just south of I-10. You can get to the two post offices and to the Heights hospital on 19th, so that’s something. I’m really not sure where else you’d need to go. What am I missing?

Anyway. I’m tempted to download the app for this thing and then take it to someplace in the North Zone from my house in the South Zone, and compare travel times to riding my bike there. I’ll report back if I do. Have you tried this, or are you tempted to? Where did you/would you take it?

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Another CD18 contender

Posted on April 27, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

From The Downballot

Zoe Cadore, who works as a lobbyist for an energy company, became the latest Democrat to enter the special election for Texas’ 18th District on Tuesday. Cadore, a former congressional staffer who was Miss Houston in 2013, is competing with several other candidates in the Nov. 4 all-party race to replace the late Rep. Sylvester Turner in this safely Democratic seat.

I don’t know that “lobbyist for an energy company” is going to be the kind of vibe that catches on with CD18 voters this year – unless maybe it’s a renewable energy company – but we’ll see. Politico teased this last month (spoiler alert: it’s not a renewable energy company she works for), I found that when I googled her name, as this was the first I’d heard of this. Hard to break through when Christian Menefee and Amanda Edwards and Isaiah Martin are out there raising money. Cadore’s name was among those of the non-money-raisers, and I didn’t give her any thought because I’d not heard of her. My bad, but we’ll see how she does from here. It’s going to be hard to break through. Here’s a brief profile about her if you want to know more.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Measles update: Now in Collin County

Posted on April 26, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Sure hope this is an isolated case.

A middle school student in Collin County has tested positive for measles, health officials confirmed Wednesday, the first reported case in a child in the Dallas-Fort Worth area this year amid an outbreak of cases in Texas.

The student attends Willow Springs Middle School in Lucas, part of the Lovejoy Independent School District, according to Collin County Health Care Services. It was not immediately clear whether the child’s measles case was connected to the ongoing outbreak that began in West Texas in January.

“We are working closely with the school and public health officials to notify potentially exposed individuals and implement appropriate precautions,” Derrick Jackson, a county spokesperson, wrote in an email to The Dallas Morning News. “Measles is a highly contagious disease, and we encourage families to ensure their vaccinations are up to date.”

[…]

Last week, Collin County health officials warned of a possible measles exposure in Plano. Officials said an individual who spent time in the county on April 10-11 and visited three retailers in Plano had tested positive for measles. The case reported in Lucas this week is not related to the possible exposure at three stores in Plano, Jackson said.

Also last week, a measles case was confirmed in Rockwall County, possibly connected to the West Texas outbreak.

The Texas Department of State Health Services’ most recent update on the outbreak, which was released Tuesday, did not include any cases in Collin County.

We’ve seen isolated cases in counties like Harris and Fort Bend, that were not related to Gaines County and didn’t spread beyond the initial patients. I sure hope that’s what’s happening here.

I’ve shared some stories of vaccination clinics having to close because of federal grant cutbacks. Here’s another.

Austin Public Health says new federal grant cuts will limit the number of people it can vaccinate through its clinics amid Texas’ ongoing measles outbreak.

The department’s Immunization Unit lost funding late last month after the U.S. Health and Human Services Department ended COVID-19 grants. A total of 27 Austin Public Health positions were removed as a result of the federal cuts, making it harder for the department to staff its clinics and administer vaccines.

“Our money is going away that we have used … to vaccinate people through some of our teams (and) our mobile teams, and so that capacity is going to decrease,” said Austin-Travis County Health Authority Dr. Desmar Walkes in an interview with Hey Austin.

Austin Public Health has been using its clinics to administer vaccines including those for MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella), to help prevent a measles outbreak in Travis County. As of Tuesday, a total of 624 measles cases and two child fatalities have been confirmed in West Texas.

In Travis County, only one case of measles has been confirmed, in an unvaccinated child who had been traveling, Walkes said. The department was preparing for measles as early as last year, and ramped up efforts after the Travis County case was confirmed in late February, holding regular meetings and increasing outreach.

That’s from the newsletter for the CityCast Austin podcast. Yes, there are two Texas cities with CityCast podcasts, and neither of them are Dallas.

You may be thinking hey, I’m vaccinated, or old enough to have gotten immunity the old-fashioned way. This isn’t my problem now. How bad could it be that some unvaxxed people get sick? Well, it could be very bad.

While it’s impossible to say for certain, experts say that we’re standing on a precipice. It’s not out of the question that measles could rip through the entire country like wildfire. If each case is a spark, “the brush is burning right now,” says epidemiologist Michael Mina, who studies how infections and vaccines affect human health. Whether the burning brush will ignite the whole forest just depends on how long our strained firewalls can hold.

Measles could continue breaking out in these bubbles (bad, but relatively confined to certain geographic areas). Or, if those bubbles grow large enough, they could converge and turn into a countrywide epidemic (very, very bad). To imagine how bad it could get, we can look to Europe, Mina recently argued in a New York Times op-ed. In 2018, the continent saw more than 80,000 cases, tens of thousands of hospitalizations, and over 70 deaths, Mina says, including in countries that had achieved—and subsequently lost—elimination status. That’s possible here, too.

[…]

While measles’ mortality rate is relatively low compared with other diseases—about 0.2 percent of people infected with measles in the U.S. will die—the hospitalization rate is incredibly high: 20 percent, for people who haven’t been vaccinated. “This is not a benign disease,” says Weber. “How many infectious diseases do we have that 10 to 20 percent of the people end up in the hospital?” (It’s certainly not that high for flu, COVID, or other respiratory illnesses.)

All that being said, here’s the very worst-case scenario for what could happen next with measles, according to Steier’s calculations. Given measles’ mortality rate of 0.2 percent, if the entire unvaccinated U.S. population (23.5 million people) were exposed to measles, nearly 50,000 people could die. (This would likely occur over several years.) Given that 90 percent of exposed unvaccinated people become infected, and then 20 percent of that number face hospitalization, millions could end up in the hospital, and some with potentially lifelong complications, including neurological damage, intellectual disabilities, and hearing loss. They also face the risk of something called immune amnesia, where the immune system “forgets” its immunity to other infectious diseases for a period of weeks to years. Even if they survive the measles, they could suffer or die from something else because they got the measles. None of these calculations include the 22 million immunocompromised Americans who face heightened risk even if they were vaccinated.

So yeah, that’s bad. Unlikely, to be sure, but not zero. And we’re making it much harder to do the one thing that would lower the odds and reduce the severity of this scenario.

And finally, here’s your Friday update.

Texas health officials reported that a measles outbreak centered in the South Plains region grew to 646 cases on Friday, with more than two-thirds of infections in children and teens.

The latest update from the Texas Department of State Health Services added 22 new cases since the agency’s last update on Tuesday. Nearly all of the cases have been in individuals who have not received the vaccine that protects against measles, mumps and rubella, or whose vaccination status is unknown.

There have been 64 people hospitalized for treatment since the outbreak began in late January. Two children, an 8-year-old girl and a 6-year-old girl, died after contracting the virus.

The DSHS estimated that fewer than 10 of the Texans who have contracted measles amid the outbreak — about 1% of the total — are actively infectious because they developed a rash less than a week ago. An individual may be infectious up to four days before a rash appears and up to four days after it’s gone.

The DSHS said there is ongoing measles transmission in 10 counties across the state: Cochran, Dallam, Dawson, Gaines, Garza, Lynn, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

The outbreak has also spread to New Mexico, which reported 66 cases of measles on Friday, and Oklahoma, which reported 13. New Mexico has reported one suspected measles death, an unvaccinated adult who tested positive for the virus after dying.

Texas has reported 49 new cases of measles over the past week, according to DSHS data. The state has been reporting about 50 new cases of measles per week since Valentine’s Day, aside from a two-week surge in late March and early April.

Seven of the 22 new cases reported on Friday are in Gaines County. The small county along the New Mexico border has now seen a total of 393 cases, nearly 61% of all infections associated with the outbreak.

Terry County reported five new cases, increasing its total to 59. Terry County has reported the second-most cases associated with the outbreak.

Three new cases were reported in Lamar County, raising its total to 14. Cochran, Dawson and El Paso counties each reported two new cases, while Andrews County reported one new case.

Of the 646 cases in Texas, 191 have been in children younger than 5 years old and 243 have been in children and teens between 5 and 17, according to the DSHS.

Only 28 cases — about 4% of all cases associated with the outbreak — have been in people who received at least one dose of MMR vaccine prior to an infection.

Texas has seen 28 measles cases in 2025 that are not connected to the outbreak, most of them associated with international travel, according to the DSHS. Four have been in Harris County, one was in Fort Bend County and one was in Brazoria County.

I appreciate that paragraph about the rate of new cases per week. It’s not that the case counts are declining, they’re steady at this level after there was a brief surge. That number could surely go up – I continue to be worried about new cases showing up in the bigger counties – but so far that has not happened. Here’s hoping.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Recapping the whiny sore loser election contest lawsuits

Posted on April 26, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

A useful guide from the Chron. I admit, I had lost track of a couple of these.

The 2022 midterm elections proved contentious for Harris County. Ballot paper shortages, long lines at polling locations and malfunctioning voting equipment fueled allegations from conservative candidates and officials that the county’s elections were rigged to favor Democrats.

A storm of legal action followed. The Texas Legislature abolished Harris County’s newly-formed elections administrator’s office, a criminal investigation was launched and Republicans filed a slew of lawsuits on the second anniversary of the Jan. 6 Insurrection.

Twenty-one candidates, all Republicans, brought their grievances before a visiting judge in a bid to overturn the election.

But Judge David Peeples, who was brought in from San Antonio to oversee the cases, upheld the results of all but one of the elections. Three cases were dropped, one was dismissed and an appeals court ruled Tuesday that there was no evidence to support Republican allegations of voter suppression in 14 of the cases — leaving just three outstanding.

The Harris County Republican Party did not respond to the Houston Chronicle’s request for comment.

Here’s what happened to each of the cases.

There’s the DaSean Jones/Tami Pierce case, the one victory for the Republicans. The story note that this ruling is still under appeal and as such the election that had been scheduled for this May has been postponed. There’s the Republican appeal that was denied earlier this week, which was a consolidation of 14 cases; the Chris Daniel/Marilyn Burgess case was just the one that got used for the name. I’d have to go back and check them all, but most if not all of them were Democratic victories in the range of the 25K vote margin that Burgess had, which would have been an extremely tall order to fill, if they had bothered to present evidence. Not presenting any sure made it easier for the judges, and more hilarious from an objective standpoint.

The remaining cases:

Peeples ruled in favor of elected officials in two judicial races that remain unresolved in appeals court: Erin Lunceford’s case against Judge Tamika Craft for judge of the 189th District Court, and Rory R. Olsen’s claim against Judge Jason Cox for Probate Court No. 3.

Lunceford lost to Craft by 2,743 votes. Peoples found that, while around 2,779 illegal votes were cast in the election, that was not enough to place the “true outcome” of the race in doubt.

“Even if the 2,779 affected votes had benefited Craft by 90% to 10%, an assumption no one would make, that would not be enough to affect the result,” Peoples wrote in the ruling.

The First Court of Appeals is hearing Lunceford’s case. Her attorneys argue that estimates used to determine Peeple’s findings were inaccurate and failed to address voters who were allegedly unable to cast ballots because of paper shortages.

Olsen lost to Cox by a much larger margin of more than 33,000 votes. Peeples once again found that any issues that impacted the election were not significant enough to have a material impact on the outcome of Cox and Olsen’s race.

Olsen’s case is being heard in the 14th Court of Appeals. He alleged that Peeples erred in granting Cox’s motion for a no-evidence summary judgement, among other concerns.

The four remaining cases were either dropped or dismissed the same year they were filed. The most high-profile of which was Alexandra del Moral Mealer’s election challenge against Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo.

[…]

Two other Republican candidates dropped their election challenges around the same time as Mealer. Sartaj Bal dropped his case against Judge Toria Finch on Sept. 28, 2023, and James Lombardino dropped his claim against Judge Audrie Lawton-Evans on Oct. 4, 2023.

Dan Spjut attempted to drop his case against Juanita Jackson in August 2023, but Peeples instead chose to dismiss the suit outright.

Ah, Alex Mealer, the whiniest and sore-loserest of the bunch, who has since failed upward to a completely undeserved spot on the Metro board. I’m sure she’s a peach to sit next to in long meetings. Anyway, I expect Lunceford and Olsen to lose their appeals, and I hope DaSean Jones wins his. Someday we will get those results.

Posted in Election 2022, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More on the Aurora rollout

Posted on April 26, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

From Axios.

Drivers along a 200-mile stretch of I-45 between Dallas and Houston should get ready for something new: The semi-truck in the next lane might not have anyone in the driver’s seat.

[…]

What they’re saying: “Everybody is looking at the same economics,” Jeff Farrah, CEO of the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, tells Axios.

  • “The federal government is saying we have to move 50% more freight by 2050, but there’s a shortage of drivers. How do I solve this puzzle with more freight to move and less drivers to do it?”

The other side: Members of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association are skeptical of AV trucking companies’ safety claims, especially since there are no federal regulations for AVs.

  • “It’s absurd that AVs, which are unproven and unmanned, are given more latitude on American highways than professional drivers with years of experience like me are given,” Lewie Pugh, the group’s executive vice president, said in an interview.
  • AV companies are self-regulated, while drivers are subject to many federal rules.
  • Drivers are required to take regular breaks for safety reasons, for example, while AV trucks can operate 24/7 — better efficiency, the industry argues.

Where it stands: At least 10 companies are known to be developing driverless technology for trucks.

  • Most expect to “pull the driver” — or go fully autonomous — on public roads later this year or in 2026.
  • They all plan to begin in Texas, known for its vital freight corridors, favorable regulatory policies and good weather.
  • Kodiak Robotics, which intends to go public soon, says it has already surpassed 750 hours on private roads across West Texas’s Permian Basin without a human driver on board.

See here for the previous post. Look at it this way, by the time you read this the no-backup-drivers trucks may already be out there, and you probably won’t notice them. They have been on the road with the backup drivers for several years now. The tariff-decimated economy may slow this down a bit, but that will be temporary. This is where we are.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fair for Houston sends a warning

Posted on April 25, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

They’ve been more than patient.

A Houston advocacy group warned Mayor John Whitmire and council members Thursday that the city is risking a lawsuit if it continues to ignore the will of voters by participating on a regional planning board without having a greater say in its decisions.

Council members in October voted to renew the city’s membership in the Houston-Galveston Area Council, which is in charge of distributing federal funds for infrastructure, climate mitigation and workforce development projects such as the contentious Interstate 45 expansion and flood relief.

Under Proposition B, which was championed by the grassroots organization Fair for Houston, the city and Harris County were supposed to receive “population proportional” representation on the council or they would have to leave it.

Negotiations with H-GAC ultimately failed to provide more representation for Houston on the board, and when Houston leaders voted to renew the city’s membership on the council, critics argued the decision violated the will of voters.

Whitmire, at the time, said the city was going to take up the issue with state lawmakers to get clarity on Houston’s representation issues.

In Fair for Houston’s Thursday letter, legal representatives gave the city three possible pathways to avoid legal consequences. Either the city could pass a resolution backing out of the council within 30 days of receiving the letter, or the city could re-open negotiations for a proportional voting structure and come to an agreement within 60 days. If that negotiation is not reached, lawyers are requesting Houston pull out of H-GAC.

“If the city fails to meet any of these deadlines, our clients will be forced to immediately pursue legal action,” the letter reads.

See here for the background, and here for a copy of Fair for Houston’s letter. Maybe Mayor Whitmire has made progress getting some legislation passed this session to bolster Houston’s representation in H-GAC. I mean, it’s been a great session for Houston’s ability to chart its own destiny so far. Go ahead and go back to the negotiating table if we can – if the other H-GAC members will be bothered to sit down with us – but call me a pessimist on that front. I don’t love the idea of abandoning H-GAC, warts and all, especially since we have no idea what would happen afterwards – among many other things, we don’t have a sympathetic federal government to deal with now – but elections are supposed to mean something. A reminder of that would be good.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

It’s the Hotze Show again

Posted on April 25, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Oh, my God.

For old time’s sake

For over a decade, Americans with private health insurance have enjoyed free access to dozens of types of preventive health care: cholesterol medication, prenatal care, and many types of cancer screenings, as well as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), the “miracle drug” that prevents HIV infection. But on Monday, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could gut the part of the Affordable Care Act that requires insurers to cover these services at zero cost to patients.

Kennedy v. Braidwood Management is at least the eighth time the Supreme Court has weighed in on a major element of the ACA since the health law was passed during the Obama administration in 2010. The lawsuit—filed by a group of Christian businesses and individuals who object to PrEP on religious grounds and Obamacare on ideological ones—takes aim at the US Preventive Services Task Force, a panel of independent, volunteer experts who rate the effectiveness of different types of preventive care. The ACA requires insurers to fully cover services rated “A” or “B” by the task force.

Currently, members of the task force are appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. But the case being heard by the Supreme Court argues that the Constitution requires officials who wield that level of power to be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

The legal argument is highly technical, and oral arguments on Monday barely touched on the case’s potentially vast consequences for public health. If the justices agree with the plaintiffs, the task force and its recommendations for the last 15 years could be thrown out, and insurers could start denying coverage or imposing out-of-pocket costs on dozens of currently free preventive screenings and services—meaning many fewer patients would choose to get them.

“The people who are going to be hurt most are the people who can’t just pull out a credit card and pay full cost for a service, or pay a $50 co-pay or an $80 co-pay,” says Wayne Turner, senior attorney at the National Health Law Program. “It is a literal lifesaver for people to be able to have some early detection.”

Among the threatened services are free HIV screenings for all, and PrEP for those at increased risk of contracting the virus. While HIV has become much less deadly since the mid-1990s, when more than 40,000 people in the United States were dying of related causes annually, there are still nearly 32,000 new infections and 8,000 HIV-linked deaths in the US every year, according to the health policy think tank KFF. PrEP—first approved by the FDA as a daily pill in 2012—lowers the risk of acquiring HIV through sex by 99 percent, and through injection drug use by 74 percent.

But the drug can cost up to $1,800 per month, so when the Preventive Services Task Force gave it an “A” rating in 2019, making it 100% covered by insurance, use of the drug appears to have soared. In 2015, 3 percent of people recommended for a PrEP prescription got one; in 2022, 31 percent did, according to the HIV and Hepatitis Policy Institute. Kennedy v. Braidwood threatens to reverse this progress.

At the center of the lawsuit are a trio of Texans who have become conservative heroes in the culture wars against LGBTQ and reproductive rights: A powerful anti-LGBTQ activist, a lawyer known for masterminding Texas’ abortion vigilante law, and the judge they like to bring their cases to.

The lead plaintiff, Braidwood Management, is owned by 74-year-old doctor Steven Hotze, a Houston-area alternative medicine guru, conservative powerbroker, far-right activist, and Republican megadonor. As my Mother Jones colleague Tim Murphy has written, Hotze—a former anti-abortion lobbyist—has a history of being very publicly anti-gay going back to at least the 1980s, when he campaigned to make it legal to discriminate against queer people in housing and employment.  In 1985, he endorsed a mayoral candidate who said that the best way to fight the AIDS epidemic was to “shoot the queers.” Years later, Hotze crusaded against same-sex marriage, backing Texas’ statewide ban in 2005 and filing a Supreme Court brief in 2015 arguing that gay marriage was “against the Bible.” (Hotze did not respond to a request for comment.)

In 2020, Hotze—who had reportedly become fond of Covid conspiracies and QAnon slogans—allegedly paid a former Houston police captain over $260,000 to conduct a private investigation into voter fraud in Harris County. The investigator pursued the outlandish theory that an air conditioner repairman was using his truck to transport more than 750,000 forged mail ballots signed by undocumented Hispanic children, per a lawsuit filed by the repairman. So the investigator ran the repairman’s truck off the road, then held him at gunpoint while an associate searched the truck, which contained only air conditioner parts. Hotze was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, among other crimes, for his alleged role in commissioning the private investigation and knowledge of the ex-cop’s plan to confront the repairman. He has pleaded not guilty and says the prosecution is part of a conspiracy against him.

Now, he’s at the center of a case that could dismantle a key part of the ACA.

Hotze has sued over Obamacare before, challenging the law in 2013 on the grounds that taxation bills must originate in the House, whereas parts of the ACA were first introduced in the Senate. (He also released two techno tracks around that time, with lyrics like: “What would Davey Crockett do? I know what I’m going to do. I’m going to fight Obamacare.”) But lower court judges threw out the case, and in 2016 the Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal.

In 2020, Braidwood Management and other plaintiffs sued over the ACA again, this time claiming their religious freedom was being violated by the law’s zero-cost preventive services requirement. Hotze specifically objected to mandatory insurance coverage for PrEP medications, which the lawsuit claimed “facilitate behaviors such as homosexual sodomy, prostitution, and intravenous drug use, which are contrary to Dr. Hotze’s sincere religious beliefs.”

Representing Hotze and the other plaintiffs was none other than Jonathan Mitchell, the legal strategist and former Texas solicitor general known for crafting Texas’s “bounty hunter” anti-abortion law, SB 8, which cut off most abortion access in his state even before the fall of Roe v. Wade. Last year, Mitchell served as President Donald Trump‘s lawyer in front of the Supreme Court, arguing (successfully) against Colorado’s attempt to exclude Trump from the 2024 ballot.

For as great a city as Houston is, it’s like every single one of us violated a crypt or something in a past life, and we’re cursed with the existence of Steven Hotze as a result. I can’t think of a better explanation for it than that. I remember the 2013 lawsuit, but I missed the more recent one other than a brief mention in passing in 2022. Sorry, there’s only so much room in my brain for this asshole.

LawDork did us the favor of paying attention to the arguments. Good news, SCOTUS seems unimpressed by Hotze’s case, though for the uncomfortable reason that ruling in his favor would weaken the executive branch, which as we know is not something they like to do, at least not while a Republican is in office. The bad news is thus that defeating Hotze would give a boost to RFK Jr; I’ll leave it to you to read the analysis for why. This is why we can’t have nice things.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Dispatches from Dallas, April 25 edition

Posted on April 25, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

This is a weekly feature produced by my friend Ginger. Let us know what you think.

This week, in news from Dallas-Fort Worth: protests; the Lemon on Stemmons; deaths at both the Dallas and Tarrant County jails; the firestorm surrounding a teen’s death in Frisco; a roundup of area election news; the latest on water plans and how locals can put their $0.02 in; more trouble in Irving around the Sands deal; a big step forward for Oak Cliff’s deck park; the Dallas connection of the Camerlengo, a major Catholic official who’s highly visible in the wake of the recent death of the Pope; movie and book news; and the ladies of Dallas get their bonnets on for the Arboretum. And more!

This week’s post was brought to you by the music of Kraftwerk, who I am going to see tonight and will have already seen by the time you read this post.

We have a grab bag, so let’s dive right in:

  • On April 19, we had a second mass day of protests in the Metroplex against the Trump administration’s policies. The DMN has the story of a number of the local protests after missing the last round completely; the Star-Telegram and the Fort Worth Report have the protests in Fort Worth. There was also a separate protest on April 15 against the detainment of Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia grad student whose jailing by ICE kicked off the current round of imprisonment of pro-Palestinian protestors and cancellations of student visas.
  • It looks like the city is going to sell “the Lemon on Stemmons”, the permitting building that was purchased without due diligence that turned out to be uninhabitable by employees. Per the DMN, the city didn’t have a proper process in place for acquiring the building and property investments of that size, so the City Manager is going to have to work on that. Meanwhile, the Stemmons building is for sale. More details from local real estate site Candy’s Dirt.
  • Speaking of building purchases, Dallas city council has also approved buying the old DMN building as part of the revitalization of the area around the Kay Bailey Hutchison convention center. The vote was 13-2, with Mayor Eric Johnson one of the holdouts. I hope they have a better plan for how to use this building in place.
  • And on the subject of Mayor Johnson and being on the downside of things, the DMN has an analysis of how partisanship will affect the May council elections. Council elections are officially nonpartisan but after the mayor’s change of parties, this year’s elections has seen both Republicans and Democrats express more interest in and put more effort toward the council elections with Republicans making sure as many seats as possible were contested. Republican gadfly Allen West is currently the chair of the Dallas County GOP; we’ll have to see if his strategies go anywhere. (If he thinks his candidate in D10, my council district, is a good candidate, he’s got a different idea of what good looks like than I do.) DMN political analyst Gromer Jeffers contributed to this report. It’s worth your time.
  • The DMN got five minutes to talk to new Dallas Police Chief Daniel Comeaux.
  • DMN editorial columnist Robert Wilonsky would like to ask Ken Paxton why, exactly, do you need to bring a gun to a concert? in response to his lawsuit to allow guns at Fair Park and the Majestic Theatre, where I am seeing that Kraftwerk concert tonight. I’m with Wilonsky, especially since the Majestic sells booze during these shows.
  • I mentioned the tragic death of Austin Metcalf at a UIL track meet in Frisco recently. That story continues across local front pages, not least because the suspect in the stabbing is a Black teen, Karmelo Anthony, and Metcalf was white. Both families have been harassed and Metcalf’s family members have been swatted twice. Meanwhile, an out-of-state organization called Protect White Americans rallied in the parking lot of the stadium where Metcalf died. The leader of the protest called Metcalf’s father, who, to his credit, told the protestors that he didn’t condone what they were doing. Local journalist Steven Monacelli covered the protest (Bluesky, also warning: photos of racist signs). The DMN’s editorial board thinks everybody is behaving badly (except maybe Austin Metcalf’s father, for telling off the white supremacists) and social media is to blame. I can’t say that but I have seen a lot of talk about it on the Dallas and Texas subreddits, with speculation about how the incident between the two youths started and why Anthony was in the wrong place and had a weapon in the first place. It’s an ugly and sad story; the DMN is right about that.
  • There was also a shooting last week at Wilmer-Hutchins High School in which four students were wounded after the shooter, another seventeen-year-old, was let in with his gun through an unsecured door. Students returned to school on Tuesday, a week after this shooting, which follows a previous shooting in which a student was wounded in 2024. The shooter is in the Dallas County jail, waiting for trial.
  • Back in March, an inmate named Andra Adkins died at the Dallas County Jail. The medical examiner’s office failed to perform an autopsy on the grounds that the inmate apparently died by suicide. The inmate also had a number of serious medical conditions. His death is being investigated by (sigh) the Tarrant County Sherriff’s Office, so at least someone is looking into it, as required by state law.
  • There has also been another death at the Tarrant County Jail: a 57-year-old woman with multiple health conditions. The Star-Telegram story is concise but not particularly informative; KERA has more and more context, including the reminder that this is the 71st death of an inmate in jail custody since Sherriff Bill Waybourn took office in 2017; the DMN story falls between the other two. This is the third death at the Tarrant County Jail this year. No cause of death has been released in any of the deaths.
  • On the subject of Chasity Bonner, who died last May in the Tarrant County Jail, we have some changing of stories about video evidence requested by the family and the press. The late release of the video is one of a long line of delays that Bonner’s family says is an attempt to wait out the deadline for a wrongful death suit.
  • It’s also been a year since Anthony Johnson Jr’s death in the Tarrant County jail and no trial date has been set for the two jailers accused of killing him. The civil trial is also in limbo.
  • Bolts Magazine also has a story about the Tarrant County Jail and all the deaths and investigations. Since 2021, more than two dozen people have died in the jail without the legally required investigations into their deaths following on. The whole article repeats a lot of things I’ve talked about here and draws it together very well. This one is also worth your time.
  • Moving on to election-related news: early voting has started and Dallas County is confident in its new pollbook software, the software that checks in voters. After the pollbook software failed in some precincts in the November election, the software was decertified and replaced by new pollbooks from KNOWiNK. KNOWiNK isn’t a new vendor; their pollbooks are used in 29 states and checked in about a quarter of the voters in last November’s election.
  • Frisco’s bond propositions for its new arts center are the hot topic in its election.
  • KERA asks who Families for Irving, the PAC behind city council candidates, is. The answer seems to be they’re an astroturf Republican group but KERA doesn’t tell us who’s funding them. That’s what I want to know.
  • The Mansfield mayoral race, which is nominally nonpartisan, features a nonpartisan incumbent and a challenger who’s rallying with Bo French, Allen West, and the True Texas Project. These nominally nonpartisan races in the Metroplex are all turning partisan over time.
  • Local blogger Mark Steger reports on the League of Women Voters candidate forum for Richardson City Council.
  • Meanwhile, Richardson first-day early voters had a ballot error that won’t affect the outcome of the vote: the four races that were omitted had only one incumbent candidate each.
  • 2026 watch: Rep. Jasmine Crockett raised $1.68 million in the first quarter of 2025. Not putting up with any crap pays off big.
  • The latest on the Marvin Nichols Reservoir planned to supply east Texas water to the Metroplex: East Texas has asked the Texas Water Development Board to declare the reservoir an interregional conflict and solve it.
  • Meanwhile, our north Texas 2026 water plan, covering the next 50 years, is open for public comment. Click through to find out about public meetings and how to comment online or by mail.
  • The Irving-Sands business dealings over the new resort the Sands folks want just got messier: an Irving resident has accused the Irving-Las Colinas Chamber of Commerce of making a backroom deal with the Las Vegas Sands Corp. to sell the Sands the old Texas Stadium site. The resident has filed a pre-suit discovery petition to gather evidence. The Sands deal is also a major factor in the Irving city council elections mentioned above; the DMN story at the link has context for the accusations.
  • Ken Paxton’s latest harassment of the EPIC City developers demands records of any contacts Plano ISD has had with the mosque. Nobody knows what he’s talking about.
  • Earlier this week a Denton County Commissioner and her husband were attacked by their 23-year-old grandson. She survived and was hospitalized; her husband was killed. The DMN has details of this tragedy and tributes to the commissioner, who is expected to survive, and her late husband.
  • Denton County put a faith-based nonprofit in charge of its homeless shelter and they’re not living up to their contract with the county. The county is also bad at dealing with homeless encampments.
  • On Earth Day, the city officially renamed the deck park over I-35 in Oak Cliff, near the Dallas Zoo. Halperin Park also got its first trees. This is an attempt to build the equivalent of Klyde Warren Park in Oak Cliff; the big question is whether the Zoo can anchor the park and provide regular parkgoers the way the Arts District does for Klyde Warren.
  • This week I learned that Amber alerts were originally suggested by a Fort Worth woman. Like most of us, Diana Simone now thinks Amber Alerts need reform to make them useful again.
  • North Texas had Weather over the weekend: nine possible tornadoes west of Fort Worth on Saturday night, five of which have been confirmed. In east Dallas, where I live, the thunder this week has been strong enough to rock my pier-and-beam 1960s home, which is a lot more impressive when the piers are made of brick than it is for piers made of wood.
  • The Camerlengo, a senior catholic official who acts as interim pope and prepares the papal conclave for the election of the new pope, is Cardinal Kevin Farrell, formerly the Bishop of Dallas. He was in Dallas from 2007 until he was called to the Vatican in 2016, where he served in a number of offices and advanced to the position of Camerlengo in 2019.
  • The Dallas International Film Festival starts this weekend and Texas Monthly has the scoop. It’s now an Oscar-qualifying festival, which has meant a lot more interest in exhibiting. In other local film news, our reputation as a movie town got us an advance screening of the new Marvel movie, Thunderbolts.
  • In other film-adjacent news, Texas Christian University plans to give Taylor Sheridan an honorary doctorate. Sheridan has been filming Landsman, based on a Texas Monthly podcast, in Fort Worth recently.
  • This week I learned that Melinda French Gates grew up in Dallas and graduated from Ursuline Academy. She was interviewed by D Magazine as part of the publicity for her new memoir.
  • Last, but not least, if you admire the crazy hats British women wear to Ascot, you’ll love the Dallas version: The Mad Hatter’s Luncheon at the Dallas Arboretum. The photos of the fundraiser are unsurprisingly over-the-top.
Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Just another reminder that abortion bans kill women

Posted on April 24, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

In case you needed it.

Pregnant people living in states with abortion bans are almost twice as likely to die during pregnancy or soon after giving birth, a report released Wednesday found. The risk is greatest for Black women in states with bans, who are 3.3 times more likely to die than White women in those same states.

The Gender Equity Policy Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization that put out the report, found that pregnancy-related death rates have increased in states with abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned; meanwhile, death rates have declined in states that protect abortion access. The report found that pregnant Black women, White women and Latinas are all at greater risk of death in states with abortion bans than they would be if they lived in states that protect abortion rights.

“There are two Americas for reproductive-aged women and people who can become pregnant in the United States,” said Nancy Cohen, founder of the Gender Equity Policy Institute. “One America, where you’re at serious risk of major health complications or death if you become pregnant, and one where you’re most likely to have a positive birth experience, a healthy pregnancy and a healthy child.”

Researchers compared pregnancy-related deaths in states where abortion is almost completely banned and where it is protected. (The World Health Organization defines pregnancy-related deaths as ones experienced while pregnant or within 42 days of the pregnancy ending, and only if the death was “from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management.”) The report relies on data from the federal government’s National Vital Statistics Section, analyzing pregnancy-related deaths from 2019 through 2023. The data focused on people who identified as “mother” and did not specifically study pregnancy-related deaths for transgender and nonbinary people.

[…]

In Texas, the largest state to ban abortion, the trend is most pronounced: In 2022, the first full year Texas had outlawed most abortions, pregnancy-related deaths went up by 56 percent, the report found — a much larger jump than the national increase of 11 percent. In states with abortion protections, the report found pregnancy-related deaths declined by 21 percent since the end of Roe.

The impact in Texas was most visible among White women, who typically have far lower rates of pregnancy-related deaths — but who, in 2022, saw a 95 percent increase in deaths. In 2023, the report found, White women and Latinas in Texas were 1.7 times more likely to die because of their pregnancy compared to their peers in states with laws protecting abortion rights. This is especially stark when compared to pregnant people in California, which has the lowest rate of pregnancy-related death: Latinas in Texas were three times more likely to die, and White women were twice as likely.

“The spike in White maternal mortality in Texas is a canary in the coal mine, because White women typically have far lower rates of maternal mortality,” Cohen said. “We know from some of the reporting of individual cases in Texas that these are women with insurance, they’re middle class. And what it suggests is the breadth of the potential impact of abortion bans.”

Still, giving birth in Texas remains most perilous for Black women — who in 2023 were 2.5 times more likely to die because of pregnancy compared to White women in the state. Nationally, Black women in states with abortion bans are at the greatest risk of pregnancy-related death; the analysis found that among Black women, 60.9 die for every 100,000 live births, compared to 18.2 White women and 18.2 Latinas.

See here for the report. We have discused this subject before. This data is likely to be harder to come by now because of DOGEbag antics and the Trump administration’s hostility to science, medicine, and of course women. You can make the truth harder to find, but you can’t erase it.

On a related note:

A bill seeking to clarify Texas’ abortion laws has passed out of a Senate committee, with amendments attached that aim to appease criticism from the left and the right.

Texas law bans abortion except to save the life of the pregnant patient, with penalties of up to life in prison, $100,000 fines and loss of licensure. But the law is confusing and vague, doctors and hospitals say, forcing them to delay or deny medically necessary abortions for fear of triggering the strict penalties.

Senate Bill 31 is intended to clarify when doctors can legally intervene. It aligns language between the state’s three abortion bans, removes any requirement that a medical crisis be imminent before a doctor can act, and requires doctors and lawyers to undergo training on the laws.

The original bill was closely negotiated between anti-abortion groups and medical associations, but in the weeks since it was introduced, abortion advocates and conservative groups have pushed for changes to the language of the legislation.

One set of amendments addresses concerns about whether the clarifying bill would change the legal status of the state’s pre-Roe abortion statutes. These laws, passed in the 1800s, allow for criminal charges to be brought against someone who has an abortion, as well as anyone who “furnishes the means” for an abortion.

Some conservative lawmakers have argued these statutes are in effect and have threatened to prosecute abortion funds, nonprofit groups that help pay for Texans to get abortions out-of-state, under this statute, although a federal judge has ruled the law is likely “repealed by implication,” and their work is likely protected.

Abortion funds and other advocates worried that amending the pre-Roe statutes in this clarifying bill would serve to revive them. The amended version of the bill says the legislation is neutral on the question of whether the pre-Roe statutes are in effect, while legal battles play out to resolve that question.

The bill is written “solely to clarify statutory text and to ensure medical care may be provided to a pregnant woman in a medical emergency … without prejudice to, or resolution of, any question concerning any provision within” the pre-Roe statutes, the committee substitute says.

See here for the background. I don’t know enough yet to say whether the original concerns were adequately addressed or not. For obvious reasons, I don’t trust the bill’s author, and while the doctors’ concerns are very real, they’re not the same as the abortion rights advocates’ concerns. The Current covers this angle.

During a Tuesday press conference, members of the group Free & Just, said the Republican lawmakers behind the proposal agreed to amend it so it couldn’t be used to target pregnant people for criminal prosecution. The organization is made up of plaintiffs in the Zurawski v. Texas case, in which women who experienced severe pregnancy complications sued Texas to seek clarification on when abortions are permissible under state law.

“We are cautiously optimistic that once we see the language, and that hopefully when it passes, that this is a step in the right direction,” Texas abortion advocate Kaitlyn Kash said during a Tuesday press conference in Austin. “We still have a long way to go to ensure that what happened to me and my family and my friends and their families does not continue to happen.”

Kash, who was forced to carry her dead fetus for weeks as a result of the Texas abortion ban, is one of dozens of women who argue they have been denied necessary medical care due to the law.

[…]

After lobbying lawmakers Tuesday, Kash and other plaintiffs told reporters their concerns didn’t fall upon deaf ears — at least, not this time. She credited media coverage of the effects of the Texas abortion ban on their lobbying success.

“To be quite honest, people don’t want to see women dying, and so unfortunately, it took stories like Amanda [Zurawski’s] and the women that passed away to have an impact,” she added.

Zurawski, who attended Tuesday’s press conference, went into septic shock twice and was left with a permanently closed fallopian tube after doctors refused to perform an abortion on her fetus. The fetus suffered a preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes, but because it had a detectable heartbeat, physicians feared being criminally prosecuted.

“I am encouraged today,” Zurawski said. “When I was fighting for my life in the hospital for three days, I was terrified. My family was terrified, and to think that a family going through what we went through would also have to fear going to jail on top of potentially losing their child, their wife, their daughter is absolutely terrifying.”

That helps, but I’d still like to hear from more activists, including the abortion funds. Sorry, I’m just way too cynical here. Reform Austin and the Chron have more.

Posted in National news, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Another Texas Lottery Commission director resigns

Posted on April 24, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Interesting.

Ryan Mindell, the embattled executive director of the Texas Lottery Commission, has resigned, according to a terse press release published on the agency’s website Monday afternoon.

Mindell’s departure comes almost exactly one year to the day after he took over the top job at the agency, in the wake of the abrupt resignation of longtime director Gary Grief. Prior to that, Mindell, an attorney, had served as deputy executive director, operations director and assistant general counsel.

Mindell could not be reached for comment. A spokesman for the lottery commission said the agency would have no further information because it does not comment on personnel matters.

State Sen. Bob Hall, an Edgewood Republican and a longtime lottery critic, hailed the move as a step forward. “I am in favor of doing anything that puts an end to lottery in Texas while we protect the money that was going to veterans,” Hall told the Austin American-Statesman. Most lottery proceeds — nearly $2 billion a year — fund public schools.

Despite his nearly decade-long tenure at the lottery commission, Mindell landed at the top spot at one of the most challenging eras the agency has experienced since the Texas Lottery began more than 30 years ago. Through bad timing, Mindell became the face of the commission’s growing problems.

The Houston Chronicle has spent the last year detailing a controversial Lotto Texas game in 2023, when a single buyer essentially purchased the $95 million jackpot by buying up virtually every possible number combination — 25.8 million in all. The big prize was worth a one-time payment of $58 million. Experts consulted by the newspaper calculated the winner — an anonymous corporation called RookTX — cleared more than $20 million after expenses.

As the Chronicle has reported, the big buy was arranged by a man from Malta and through a London betting company that was founded by a banker-turned professional gambler named Bernard Marantelli and a mysterious Tasmanian gambler named Zeljko Ranogajec, who had a history of buying, or trying to buy lottery draws.

Recently, the Wall Street Journal confirmed the two were behind the big Texas buy.

The bigger problem for the Texas Lottery Commission, however, was the agency’s role in abetting the operation. One of the organizers testified to legislators that when the gamblers first approached his company — a struggling online corporation called Lottery.com — for help carrying it out, he felt sure the state agency would say no.

“We fully expected that they would laugh at us and say, ‘Well, no, of course you can’t do this,’” said chief operating officer Greg Potts. Instead, the lottery commission gave its approval, Potts said.

[…]

As the new director, Mindell was left to face lawmakers’ growing wrath about the tilted lotto game, as well as the agency’s failure to corral couriers. In the first months of this year, it seemed as though Mindell was being hauled up in front of another legislative panel every week for yet another tongue-lashing.

In an effort to catch up and mollify lawmakers, Mindell changed lottery rules to prevent another bulk buy operation by professional gamblers. He also wrote new rules to prohibit courier companies from operating in Texas.

Legislators still have several pending bills to reform the lottery agency. One would ban players from acquiring “substantially all winning combinations.” Another would simply end the lottery.

Meanwhile, two civil lawsuits have been filed seeking to recover money from players who felt they were cheated out of money in the April 2023 game. Gov. Greg Abbott has ordered the Texas Rangers to investigate the 2023 game. Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced his office is also conducting its own inquiry.

See here, here, here, and here for some background. The Chron has done a lot of deep reporting on this story, not all of which I’ve blogged about, so read this article and follow its links to get the fullest picture. The thing to note is that outgoing director Mindell wasn’t the guy in charge when a lot of this was going down. He was trying to fix some of the problems that had been created, as the Trib story notes.

The lottery commission is also currently under review by the Sunset Commission. The commission, which reviews an agency before legislators choose to either pass a bill extending the agency or allow it to be abolished, criticized former director Grief in reports as comfortable operating in “gray areas” of the law to allow couriers to flourish in the state.

The report also stated, however, that evidence suggested Mindell had raised concerns about Grief’s decisions. In the wake of the “bulk purchase” of over 25 million tickets in April 2023, Mindell worked to implement policies restricting mass ticket printing, largely under the scrutiny of legislators. Mindell released a policy statement in February indicating the lottery commission now believed couriers violate current statutes, a switch from years of the agency’s claims it lacked the authority to do so.

“I think that when I became executive director, there were certainly things that I wanted to change about the tone, tenor and approach of the agency, and that’s what I’ve been focused on,” Mindell said during a House Licensing Committee hearing in March.

So I’m curious if Mindell was forced out for some reason, if he’d just had enough of this crap, or if there’s some other shoe about to drop. Maybe everyone was mad enough at the Lottery Commission that going full clean slate is the current consensus. Whatever the case, it’s interesting that it happened this way. Reform Austin has more.

Posted in Jackpot!, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Former principal sues Miles and HISD

Posted on April 24, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Interesting.

A former Houston ISD principal has filed a $3 million lawsuit alleging defamation, emotional distress, and intolerable work conditions, among other claims, against the district, state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles, the appointed Board of Managers and a Houston-based law firm representing the district.

Jessica Berry, the former principal at Herod Elementary School, filed the complaint in March for the district’s alleged violation of employment law and requested $3 million in damages. The lawsuit also asks for sanctions against the district, board and superintendent, as well as the termination of Miles and the termination of the board.

Berry alleged eight counts: intentional infliction of emotional distress; defamation; falsification of books and records; that the district’s actions created intolerable working conditions violated state labor laws; Family Medical Leave Act violations; Texas Labor Code violations; and Texas Whistleblower Act and Department of Education Whistleblower Protections violations.

The filing references Berry becoming aware that Miles put half of the district’s principal on notice for low performance after the Houston Chronicle published an article about the list in spring 2024. (Community pressure ultimately led the superintendent to backtrack.) Her school’s executive director, ranking above her, told her on April 23 of that year that the district was not in compliance with operating procedures required by the Texas Education Agency, according to this complaint filed by the 11-year educator.

The filing also covers memos Berry received on April 23 and 24 from the district alleging six violations of Employee Standards of Conduct occurring from March 22 through April 24. This appears to reference notice she received for expressing concern to supervisors about printing special education documents with confidential information.

Her filing indicates the district told Berry to resign or be terminated by the board on May 8 and offered her three months of salary despite her contract already outlining that she could be terminated without cause upon the payment of her unpaid base salary for the remainder of her contract term, with a minimum of three-months base salary. Berry did not sign the May document.

On June 6, she sent a certified letter to Miles and the district’s general counsel, Catosha Woods, asking the district to remedy violations of the Family Medical Leave Act, the Texas Labor Act and the Texas Whistleblower Act before she signs any agreement. That same day, Berry filed a Whistleblower Complaint with the Texas Education Agency. In August, the agency found that her whistleblower allegations submitted in June had merit, according to the complaint.

That sure is a big swing. I am by nature skeptical of large actions like this, especially when they seem to come out of nowhere, but I don’t know enough to judge it beyond that. We’ll see how far this gets.

Posted in Legal matters, School days | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of April 21

Posted on April 24, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

The Texas Progressive Alliance stands with Kilmar Abrego Garcia as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Continue reading →

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Measles update: Hello, Montana

Posted on April 23, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Put another state on the board, Johnny.

Montana is the ninth U.S. state to have an active measles outbreak.

The U.S. was up to 800 cases of measles nationwide on Friday. Texas is driving the high numbers, with an outbreak centered in West Texas that started nearly three months ago and is up to 597 cases. Two unvaccinated elementary school-aged children died from measles-related illnesses near the epicenter in Texas, and an adult in New Mexico who was not vaccinated died of a measles-related illness.

Other states with active outbreaks — defined as three or more cases — include Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Oklahoma, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Mexico. The U.S. has more than double the number of measles cases it saw in all of 2024.

[…]

Montana state health officials announced five cases Thursday in unvaccinated children and adults who had traveled out of state, and confirmed it was an outbreak on Monday. All five are isolating at home in Gallatin County in the southwest part of the state.

State health officials are working to trace exposures in Bozeman and Belgrade.

They are Montana’s first measles cases in 35 years. Health officials didn’t say whether the cases are linked to other outbreaks in North America.

That was from Friday, so the overall case numbers are now out of date. Here’s your Tuesday update.

The measles outbreak centered in the South Plains region of Texas surpassed 600 cases on and spread to one new county on Tuesday, health officials said.

The state has now seen 624 cases since the outbreak began in late January, according to latest update from the Texas Department of State Health Services. Most cases have been in children who have not received the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, or whose vaccination status is unknown.

The state added 27 new measles cases since the last DSHS update on Friday. The update includes the first two cases in Bailey County, located just south of the Panhandle.

Sixty-four people have been hospitalized for treatment amid the outbreak and two children, an 8-year-old girl and a 6-year-old girl, died after contracting the virus.

Fewer than 10 of the Texas who have contracted the virus — less than 2% of the total — are believed to be actively infectious, according to the DSHS. An individual may be infectious up to four days before a rash appears and up to four days after it’s gone.

The Texas outbreak has also been linked to cases in neighboring states. New Mexico reported 65 measles cases on Tuesday, while Oklahoma reported 13. New Mexico has reported one suspected measles death, an unvaccinated adult who tested positive for the virus after dying.

Fifteen of the 27 new cases reported on Tuesday are in Gaines County, the epicenter of the outbreak. The county has now seen 386 cases, nearly 62% of all cases associated with the outbreak

Five new cases are in Lubbock County, which has now seen 47 during the outbreak.

El Paso, Terry and Bailey counties each reported two new cases. Ector and Midland counties each reported one.

The update removed one case from Dawson County, which has now seen 23 cases during the outbreak. The DSHS has said its numbers are provisional, and cases may be removed if further investigation reveals the person did not have measles.

The DSHS said there is ongoing measles transmission in 10 counties across the state: Cochran, Dallam, Dawson, Gaines, Garza, Lynn, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum.

Of the 624 cases in Texas, 186 have been in children younger than 5 years old and 236 have been in children and teens between 5 and 17, according to the DSHS.

Only 22 cases have been in people who received at least one dose of MMR vaccine prior to an infection.

Texas has seen 25 measles cases in 2025 that are not connected to the South Plains outbreak, most of them associated with international travel, according to the DSHS. Four have been in Harris County and two were in Fort Bend County.

This Bloomberg News headline (paywalled story) says that the “spread is slowing”. I’d agree that the last two weeks or so have seen smaller numbers in the biweekly reports of new cases. I’m cautious about using terms like that because I think it gives people the idea that this means it’s coming to a halt, and that is definitely not the situation. It doesn’t appear to be accelerating, and that is very good. That’s as far as I’ll go for now.

The US is not the only country facing outbreaks.

Canada has documented over 730 cases of measles since the beginning of 2025 until the present. This is one of the most severe outbreaks since the country declared the virus eradicated in 1998.

The outbreak, which began in late 2024, has disproportionately affected Anabaptist communities, stated a New York Times report. The NYT report stated that as per Ontario Ministry of Health, Amish and Mennonite groups ..

The NYT report added that Mexico, in the meanwhile, has reported at least 360 cases. The majority of these occurrences have occurred in the northern state of Chihuahua, with one verified death.

Reportedly, the local health authorities said that the outbreak originated from a nine-year-old in a Mennonite community. The boy, the report stated, had recently travelled to Texas which is reeling under a massive measles outbreak.

I believe this is the NYT story in question; it too is paywalled. Contagious disease + unvaxxed community that travels = outbreaks all over the place.

And we can’t do one of these posts without reminding you again that RFK Jr and his various acolytes are truly terrible people.

A Texas doctor who has been treating children in a measles outbreak was shown on video with a measles rash on his face in a clinic a week before Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. met him and praised him as an “extraordinary” healer.

Dr. Ben Edwards appeared in the video posted March 31 by the anti-vaccine group Kennedy once led, Children’s Health Defense. In it, Edwards appears wearing scrubs and talking with parents and children in a makeshift clinic he set up in Seminole, Texas, ground zero of the outbreak that has sickened hundreds of people and killed three, including two children.

Edwards is asked whether he had measles, and he responded, “Yes,” then said his infection started the day before the video was recorded.

“Yesterday was pretty achy. Little mild fever. Spots came in the afternoon. Today, I woke up feeling good,” Edwards said in the video.

Measles is most contagious for about four days before and four days after the rash appears and is one of the world’s most contagious diseases, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Doctors and public health experts said Edwards’ decision to go into the clinic put children, their parents and their community at risk because he could have spread it to others. They said there was no scenario in which Edwards’ conduct would be reasonable.

Kennedy met with Edwards about a week after the video was posted by Children’s Health Defense, the group Kennedy led for years until December. In an April 6 post on X, Kennedy said he “visited with these two extraordinary healers,” including Edwards and another doctor, and praised their use of two unproven treatments for measles.

Even as measles has exploded in Texas and spread across the country, Kennedy, the nation’s top health official, has declined to consistently and forcefully encourage people to vaccinate their children and remind them that the vaccine is safe. Kennedy’s post drawing attention to Edwards is inappropriate but unsurprising given Kennedy’s record, said Dr. Craig Spencer, a medical doctor who is also a professor at the Brown University School of Public Health.

“I think is unfortunately perfectly on-brand for how he thinks that medicine should be practiced,” Spencer said. “And that is what makes me remarkably uncomfortable and extremely concerned and scared for the next three-and-a-half years.”

Same. But you know, the people that flock to this guy have agency. They have all of the facts available to them. They just choose not to believe them. It’s absolutely true that this guy sucks and that he’s working every day to make things worse for the rest of us. We still have to decide whether or not to follow him. Too many people get that wrong.

Anyway. The Trib has some charts for you. I’ll have another update on Saturday.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Whiny sore loser election contest appeal denied

Posted on April 23, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

I didn’t even know there was an appeal. And having read the story and the opinion, there kind of wasn’t, not in any real sense.

The 14th Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that “no evidence” was found to support a Republican-backed challenge of the 2022 district clerk election results.

Chris Daniels was one of 21 Republican candidates who filed election contest lawsuits after the results of the 2022 Harris County midterm elections. Daniels, who ran for Harris County District Clerk against Democratic incumbent Marilyn Burgess, alleged ballot paper shortages at several polling locations constituted “voter suppression,” and asked the court to overturn the results.

Following a November 2023 trial court ruling in favor of Burgess, Daniels’ legal team filed an appeal. Republican chief justice for the 14th Court of Appeals, Tracy Christopher, wrote in an opinion that while some residents may have been prevented from voting, Daniels’ attorneys did not provide sufficient evidence to prove he would have won the election had they been able to cast ballots.

“Daniels bore the burden to produce legally sufficient evidence from which a reasonable factfinder could infer that the mistakes or misconduct of Harris County election officials prevented at least 25,640 eligible Harris County voters from voting on November 8, 2022,” the 14th Court of Appeals’ opinion read. “Because he did not do so, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.”

This lawsuit was filed, along with many others, in January 2023. It was tossed, along with all but one of the others, that November. The margin of victory here was not particularly close; the amount of fraud or error to obviate the result would have to be so massive that basically every race on the ballot would need to be tossed as well. Nobody came close to providing such evidence.

The opinion, written by the Republican Chief Justice with concurrence from a Republican associate justice and a visiting judge whose name I don’t recognize, makes it clear that this whole exercise was a waste of time. District Clerk Burgess, the defendant in the original case, moved for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff Chris Daniel provided “no evidence that the number of eligible voters who were prevented from voting was at least as large as Burgess’s margin of victory.” Here’s the crux of the ruling:

Daniel has never attempted to quantify the number of eligible Harris County voters he contends were prevented from voting on November 8, 2022. To the contrary, he asserts that he is not required to “quantify an[] impossibility.” He cites no authorities that support his position, but instead states that his appeal requires this Court to answer a question of first impression that no Texas case has previously addressed: “in what way should a Contestant establish that behavior at issue under [Texas Election Code] § 221.003(a)(2) . . . makes the result of the election unknowable?”

But in fact, that question was answered over a hundred years ago.

[…]

Daniel asserts that section 221.003(a)(2) of the Texas Election Code “asks the trial [court] to focus on whether or not the official created an impediment to voting, and not the number of ballots that may be discounted.” But Daniel is mistaken. Section 221.003(a) instructs the tribunal to decide “whether the outcome of the contested election, as shown by the final canvass, is not the true outcome.” TEX. ELEC. CODE § 221.003(a). The actual outcome of the election was that Burgess defeated Daniel by 25,640 votes. To show that this was not the true outcome, Daniel had to offer legally sufficient evidence of one of two things. To have himself declared as the winner of the election, Daniel would have had to show that the election’s true outcome can be ascertained, and that the majority of votes were cast for him. Daniel made no such allegations. Alternatively, to have the election declared void and hold a new election, Daniel had to show that so many eligible voters were prevented from voting that it cannot be determined which candidate received the majority of votes. Thus, even if Daniel had presented legally sufficient evidence that misconduct by election officials prevented 20,000 eligible voters from voting, the outcome of the 2022 race for Harris County District Clerk would still be ascertainable, and Burgess still would have received the majority of votes. That the additional votes may have reduced Burgess’s margin of victory is immaterial.

In his brief, Daniel seems to suggest that he met his burden with other data, such as by showing that voters were prevented from voting at 20% of Harris County polling places on election day, or that “voters were openly turned away at 129 polling locations because of insufficient paper supplies,” or that 37 polling places did not open on time. We do not consider the effect those assertions might have had if they were supported by evidence, because no evidence supports them.

If that wasn’t enough, the opinion notes that Daniel misreads the trial judge’s opinion and cites it as evidence in his favor, when in fact it says the opposite. As the SportsCenter guys might say when showing a highlight of a batter striking out on three pitches: good morning, good afternoon, good night.

One more thing:

While Tuesday’s ruling does mark a favorable end for Harris County elected officials in 20 of the 21 suits filed by Republican challengers, one particularly narrow judicial race was overturned.

Republican Tami Pierce contested the results of the 2022 election for 180th District Court judge, which she lost to DaSean Jones by just 449 votes. Judge David Peeples, who also oversaw Daniels’ case, voided the election in 2024 and ordered a re-do election scheduled for May 5.

Yeah, no. First, the May election is set for May 3, the uniform election date for this May. May 5 is a Monday, and I for one have never heard of an election being held on a Monday, and neither has the Elections Code. I’m sure this is a typo, but this is also why God created copy editors. And as we have discussed, there is no Jones/Pierce election on the May ballot. Jones’ appeal of that ruling put a pause on the redo election, and since the matter is still being considered by the First Court of Appeals, it ain’t happening at this time. Maybe not ever, given where we are in the calendar. Can we get a cleanup on Aisle 3 here?

Posted in Election 2022, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

On immigration and the 2026 World Cup

Posted on April 23, 2025 by Charles Kuffner

Yeah, there are some big issues that we need to talk about.

Last month, Dallas officially announced the procurement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup International Broadcast Center. It will turn downtown’s Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center into a “nerve center” for thousands of international journalists broadcasting dispatches on the beautiful game back to their home countries.

While the tournament is slated to take place across 16 cities in the United States, Canada and Mexico starting next June, the swath of journalists reporting on the games will start arriving in Dallas in January 2026. However, officials within the U.S. Department of State have begun to worry about the effect federal policies on immigration could have on the international tournament, The Athletic reports.

Specifically, those officials are concerned that extended wait times for visa applications, President Donald Trump’s “America First” rhetoric and the administration’s hardline approach to deportation could threaten what FIFA President Gianni Infantino has claimed will be the “most inclusive World Cup ever.”

With Dallas’ head start on international arrivals only eight months away, the city could be the first to grapple with the complications a buckled-down immigration system during what could be the largest World Cup in history. The Observer was told by several individuals involved with North Texas’ World Cup planning that these are questions some have started asking, but concrete answers have yet to arrive.

“This is not FIFA’s first World Cup,” council member Omar Narvaez told the Observer. “Human rights are a huge tenet of FIFA. So I know that it’s been brought up, but not in a formal way. And as we learn more information, I know there are council members who will continue to ask those types of questions.”

The Observer contacted the North Texas FIFA World Cup Organizing Committee to ask if recent changes to immigration and deportation policy had been discussed. We were directed up the chain of command to FIFA.

The organization has previously stated to national outlets asking these questions: “It is worth noting that the current administration was in office during the successful bid process for 2026, and signed the government guarantees as part of that process. We continue to work with various departments and agencies of the U.S. Government to ensure the U.S. can capitalize on this once-in-a-generation opportunity to tap into billions of dollars in positive financial benefits and goodwill and bring millions of people from different nations and communities together to celebrate in the United States.”

Concerns range from the amount of time that it is taking now to get a visa, for journalists as well as for the teams, the steep dropoff in foreign visitors in recent months, the reports of foreign travelers with valid visas being harassed and detained at airports and border entry points, and so on and so forth. You can make the same list of concerns for the 2026 World Baseball Classic, but this article was all about the FIFA event in North Texas. I can imagine a world in which things are more or less the same as they are now, and I can imagine a world where it’s much worse for everyone involved, but it’s hard for me to imagine a world in which things are substantively better. The wild card is our idiot President and whatever the meth-addled weasels that inhabit his brain are fixated on at any time. As a fan, I am eagerly awaiting the 2026 Cup and thoroughly dreading it in equal measure. Good luck to the various committees trying to make it all work. May you have as much inner peace and bottles of Tums as you can stand.

Posted in La Migra, Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment