Just make up your damn mind about West 11th already

I swear, I am so sick of this.

After Houston Mayor John Whitmire’s administration removed cyclist protections along Heights Boulevard and Austin Street in March, advocates for a contentious safety project on 11th Street in the Heights neighborhood are worried it could be next on the chopping block.

Construction finished in 2023 on a $2.3 million project to add bike lanes and other safety features on 11th Street while reducing the number of lanes for cars and trucks. It drew protests and praise, from a 3,000-signature petition against the changes to a Project of the Year award from the Texas chapter of the American Public Works Association.

The project has been under review by Whitmire’s administration for more than a year. On Wednesday, he again criticized the project, saying businesses and residents don’t like it and emergency personnel avoid the street. But, he said, the administration has not made a decision on its future.

“It’s not my controversy,” Whitmire said. “I’m just trying to solve it.”

[…]

Whitmire said the Houston Fire Department avoids 11th Street since it was revamped, although photos taken by proponents of the redesign show both fire trucks and ambulances have continued to travel on the street. The fire department deferred comment to the mayor’s office.

The perceptions of higher traffic run counter to a HPW study first published by Axios. It found overall traffic times “do not appear to have increased significantly” because of the changes, with drivers experiencing an additional seven seconds of travel time during the peak morning hours and eight seconds in the evening peak.

According to the HPW analysis, the project decreased collisions and increased the presence of cyclists and pedestrians. Injury-causing crashes along 11th Street during the study periods decreased from four in 2019 to zero in 2023. All crashes decreased from 25 in 2019 to 16 in 2023. The total daily east-west crossings of Heights Boulevard by pedestrians and cyclists increased from 87 in 2019 to 324 in 2024.

Gilbert Perez, owner of Bungalow Revival LLC and Bespoke by GJCD, has noticed the increase in pedestrian volume.

“I think the bike lanes have actually slowed traffic down quite a bit,” Perez said. “It makes it a much safer street for our clients to come in, for other pedestrians. My foot traffic has increased since the bike lanes were put in, and I think it brings people from the neighborhood to our businesses.”

According to the HPW analysis, vehicle speeds decreased from as much as 39 miles per hour to as low as 30.5 miles per hour. The speed limit on 11th is 30 miles per hour.

Sara Saber, owner of Three Dog Bakery, opened her shop just as construction began and felt “a little panicked.” Now, she said, “it feels safer as a pedestrian, for sure.”

Perez and Saber are part of a coalition of 18 businesses and organizations sending a letter to Whitmire’s administration, including A New Leaf elementary school, the parent-teacher association for Hogg Middle School, the Woodland Heights Civic Association and state Rep. Christina Morales. They call for the protection of the 11th Street redesign, which they say transformed a “high-speed, dangerous thoroughfare” into a “thriving and safe corridor.”

Ashley Wilson, assistant general manager at Loro Asian Smokehouse and Bar, said the project “doesn’t really negatively affect us, but it also doesn’t really positively affect us” — but additional construction to reverse the project would.

“More construction would be annoying for us because that’s the way to get into our business,” Wilson said.

[…]

Multiple Heights residents told Houston Public Media the 11th Street project has made recreational biking more accessible. A central feature of the 11th Street project was an improved crossing at Nicholson Street, which runs parallel to a north-south hike-and-bike trail.

Jeff Worne moved his family to the Heights in 2018 because of its proximity to the hike-and-bike trail.

Before the safety improvements, Worne said, he “wouldn’t let our younger kids go anywhere close to the street to cross” because of speeding cars, but now “it feels much safer to cross there.”

The HPW analysis found a nearly 200% increase in cyclists and pedestrian use of the crossing after the project was completed, from 211 per day in 2018 to 623 in 2024.

The 11th Street bike lanes are also used by commuters to work and school, such as Rice University political scientist Bob Stein and his grandchildren.

“(Bicycles) are not a car,” Stein said. “We actually do reduce congestion.”

Stein said Whitmire’s stance is “bewildering” because he’s catering to people outside the City of Houston.

“He seems to be more concerned about suburban drivers and speed on these roads, which is exactly what has hurt the city,” Stein said.

Whitmire lied about what HFD said about the Austin Street bike lane, so I am not at all inclined to believe his claim here. I still drive up and down 11th regularly, and it’s just not any more congested or bottlenecked than before. Even at 5 PM, it flows just fine. What is different from a driving perspective is if you’re approaching 11th from a side road that doesn’t have a traffic light, and you want to make a left turn, it no longer feels dangerous. Removing the extra lanes and getting the average speed down from 40 MPH to 30 MPH makes that experience a lot less hair-raising.

Whitmire’s gonna do what Whitmire’s gonna do, we all know that. We should still do what we can to keep 11th Street safe and usable. And as long as we’re even contemplating spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to rip out brand new perfectly functional infrastructure on whims, then spare me any talk about “finding efficiencies” and “cutting waste”.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Abbott finally calls CD18 election

It’s for November.

Rep. Sylvester Turner

Gov. Greg Abbott has set Nov. 4 as the special election date to fill the congressional seat left vacant by former Rep. Sylvester Turner’s death — a timeline that leaves the solidly Democratic seat vacant for at least seven months as Republicans look to drive President Donald Trump’s agenda through a narrowly divided Congress.

Turner, a former Houston mayor and Democratic state lawmaker, died March 5, two months into his first term representing Texas’ 18th Congressional District. State law does not specify a deadline for the governor to order a special election.

With Turner’s seat vacant, the House breaks down to 220 Republicans and 213 Democrats, allowing the GOP to win a majority on the floor even with three defections from their ranks. If Turner’s seat were filled, likely by a Democrat, the GOP could withstand only two defections.

Democrats, including U.S. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the Democratic minority leader, pressured Abbott to call a special election, threatening to sue if the Republican governor continued to hold off on scheduling the contest.

Christian Menefee, the acting Harris County attorney and a Democrat running for the seat, had also threatened legal action if Abbott did not order a special election. He recently called on the governor to set the election for June 7, the date of the runoffs for the May 3 uniform election — when voters will elect representation for many local governments across Texas.

According to state law and precedent, Abbott had until March 18 to set the contest for May 3. He also could have declared an “emergency” special election, which allows for an election to take place outside the May or November uniform election dates.

Turner was elected to Congress last year after his predecessor and political ally, former U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, died of pancreatic cancer while also serving out her term. She spent nearly three decades representing the deep-blue district, which encompasses downtown Houston and several of the city’s historic neighborhoods, including the Third Ward and parts of The Heights and Acres Homes.

Also running to succeed Turner is former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards, a Democrat who twice ran for the seat in 2024. She was defeated by Jackson Lee in the March primary; Jackson Lee died before the general election, opening the party’s nomination to a vote of local party officials, who narrowly picked Turner over Edwards.

Isaiah Martin, a former staffer for Jackson Lee, also jumped into the race last month.

In a statement, Menefee blasted Abbott for not setting the election for an earlier date.

“It is unconscionable to leave nearly 800,000 people in this district without representation in Congress for most of the year,” Menefee said. “We’ll go through hurricane season, budget battles, and attacks on Social Security and Medicaid with no one at the table fighting for us. Governor Abbott knows how to move quickly — he’s done it for other districts. He just chose not to for us.”

See here for the previous update. Abbott had some more insulting BS to say about Harris County, which is par for the course for him. Look, this election should have been called for May and it could have been called for June. Once it was too late for May, I assumed it would happen in November. It was never credible to me that Abbott would try to wait until next year, and if he had I would have expected those threatened lawsuits to have a decent chance at forcing him to do what he just did. I’ll be on the lookout for those April finance reports, and we’ll see if anyone else jumps into the race. I will definitely do interviews for this in the fall. Houston Landing and the Chron have more.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Paxton sues San Antonio over abortion funding

First, this happened.

In an election-year reversal, San Antonio city leaders voted 6-5 Thursday to fast-track distribution of $100,000 to organizations that provide reproductive services, including emergency contraception and transportation for out-of-state abortion care.

Just months ago, city staff shut down a similar plan, skipping over groups that provide such services after council members spoke against the idea while debating how to distribute a new $500,000 Reproductive Justice Fund.

Since that November decision, some council members had been clamoring to come back and take the issue to a vote, which landed just weeks out from a municipal election that’s become increasingly partisan.

Four sitting council members — Adriana Rocha Garcia (D4), Melissa Cabello Havrda (D6), Manny Pelaez (D8) and John Courage (D9) — are all running for mayor.

Of those, Havrda, who led the charge for Thursday’s vote, was the only one to support the distribution of funds for abortion services — while all three of the council’s other mayoral contenders voted against it.

“We’re watching the consequences of the state abortion bans unfold in real time, and what we’re seeing is a public health crisis,” said Cabello Havrda, an attorney. “Some might ask if this is really the city’s responsibility, and the answer is real simple: ‘Yeah, it sure is.’”

[…]

In the wake of Texas’ 2021 near-total abortion ban, San Antonio is among a handful of cities that have sought other ways to help residents continue accessing abortion services.

Austin, for example, included money in its 2024-2025 budget to help cover the cost of airfare, gas, hotel stays, child care, food and companion travel for people seeking out-of-state abortions.

But Thursday’s decision to add abortion travel to San Antonio’s reproductive health fund comes as the GOP-led Texas Legislature is already working on plans to outlaw such spending.

A bill crafted by state Sen. Donna Campbell (R-New Braunfels), who represents part of San Antonio, would ban local governments from giving money to “abortion assistance entities,” which includes paying for travel costs or helping find abortion-inducing medication.

On Thursday, some city leaders were adamant that pending legislation should not stop their efforts to protect their residents, while others were skeptical of a potentially expensive legal fight.

Pelaez, who is also an attorney, contended that the move equated to “lighting $100,000 on fire” given the current political landscape.

“The cost of that lawsuit will eclipse the $100,000 by many orders of magnitude, and we’re going to lose,” he said.

Segovia said that if Campbell’s bill becomes law, the city’s contracts will be written in a way that allows the city to “pivot” and stay in compliance.

San Antonio’s City Council has made more symbolic statements in support of abortion rights, including a “reproductive justice fund” that didn’t really provide abortion funding and faced private litigation; I don’t know where that case stands. I admit that this ordinance’s passage came as a surprise to me, especially after it had been previously brought up.

This, however, was not a surprise, not at all.

On Thursday night, a divided San Antonio City Council voted 6-5 to spend $100,000 on helping residents travel out of state to get abortions.

Less than 24 hours later, Attorney General Ken Paxton sued in state court, arguing San Antonio is “transparently attempting to undermine and subvert Texas law and public policy.” The lawsuit alleges that the fund violates the gift clause of the Texas Constitution, and requests a temporary injunction blocking the funding allocation.

The lawsuit is not unexpected: Paxton previously sued the City of Austin over a similar fund.

San Antonio originally allocated $500,000 for a Reproductive Justice Fund in 2023, in response to Texas’ near-total ban on abortion. After much debate, and a private lawsuit, the money was spent on non-abortion related reproductive health initiatives, like contraception, testing for sexually transmitted infections and health workshops.

I remember the Austin ordinance but didn’t write about it at the time; that lawsuit Paxton filed against them was from late September last year, and I’m sure there was too much other news happening at the time. Be that as it may, I can’t see a path to either of these ordinances ever getting officially adopted. If Sen. Campbell’s bill is somehow not passed, the courts will get in the way, either at the statewide 15th Court of Appeals or SCOTx. It’s fine to take a doomed stand on principle when the situation calls for it, but it’s best when there’s a strategic goal behind such a stand. With all due respect to CM Cabello Havrda, I think her colleague CM Pelaez has it right. The Current has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Another name emerges as a possible Houston hockey team owner

New player alert.

NHL commissioner Gary Bettman has said the league has received interest from multiple prospective owners about a Houston hockey franchise.

On Thursday, the identity of at least another interested party became public.

ESPN reported that Houston billionaire Dan Friedkin, who owns Gulf States Toyota and The Friedkin Group among his business holdings, “has emerged as a strong ownership option” to bring an NHL franchise to Houston.

NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly confirmed to ESPN that the league met with Friedkin’s group “on a number of occasions about potential interest in a Houston expansion franchise.”

Friedkin has experience in pro sports ownership through European soccer. His company purchased Italian Serie A franchise AS Roma in 2020 and in 2024, The Friedkin Group took majority ownership of Everton in the English Premier League.

Friedkin joins Houston Rockets owner Tilman Fertitta, who’s expressed interest in bringing the NHL to town on multiple occasions since he bought the NBA franchise in October 2017. Fertitta, however, has included caveats, including in September 2024, when he said it had to be at a favorable price.

[…]

The speculation in hockey circles is that the league wants $2 billion for its next expansion franchise (Fertitta paid a then-record $2.2 billion for the Rockets seven-plus years ago). In April 2024, Utah Jazz owners Ryan and Ashley Smith paid $1.3 billion for the Arizona Coyotes’ hockey assets and relocated the team to Salt Lake City, where it’s playing its inaugural season as the Utah Hockey Club.

Bettman has maintained over the past year that the league is not in expansion mode, saying at the October Board of Governors meeting that the topic “never came up in any form.” The league last expanded in 2021 to add Seattle and reach 32 teams.

Another complication involves an arena for a Houston NHL team. Fertitta, per the Rockets’ lease, controls access to Toyota Center, so anyone interested in playing hockey there (making the building “hockey ready” is part of future renovations) would have to work with him, or perhaps build another facility.

We’ve known about Tilman Fertitta, who is also pursuing a WNBA team, for awhile. Last May, we heard about the second potential owner, and now we have a name for the rumor.

I don’t know how seriously to take all of this. Thirty-two is a pretty good number of teams for a league, but that’s not an absolute barrier to expansion. It would be nice to hear Gary Bettman use that word in a non-negative context, however. Surely Houston would be an attractive market for the NHL, past history aside. I’m just waiting for a clearer signal before I buy into the idea.

Posted in Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Paxton whistleblowers get what they asked for

Good for them, and good in general.

Still a crook any way you look

A Travis County district court judge on Friday awarded $6.6 million to four former senior aides to Attorney General Ken Paxton who said they were improperly fired after reporting Paxton to the FBI.

Judge Catherine Mauzy stated in her judgment that the plaintiffs — Blake Brickman, Mark Penley, David Maxwell and Ryan Vassar — had proven by a “preponderance of the evidence” that Paxton’s office had violated the Texas Whistleblower Act. Each of the four were awarded between $1.1 and $2.1 million for wages lost, compensation for emotional pain, attorney’s fees and various other costs as a result of the trial.

The judgment also said Paxton’s office did not dispute any issue of fact in the case, which stopped the Attorney General’s office from further contesting their liability. Tom Nesbitt, the attorney for Brickman and Maxwell, said in a statement that Paxton “admitted” to breaking the law to avoid being questioned under oath.

“It should shock all Texans that their chief law enforcement officer, Ken Paxton, admitted to violating the law, but that is exactly what happened in this case,” Nesbitt said in the statement.

In a statement to the Tribune from his office, Paxton called the ruling “a ridiculous judgment that is not based on the facts or the law” and pointed blame at former Speaker Dade Phelan, R-Beaumont, who led the Texas House effort to impeach him in 2023. “We will appeal this bogus ruling as we continue to clean up Dade Phelan’s mess,” Paxton said in the statement.

The judgment also ordered that the plaintiffs are entitled to additional attorney’s fees if they successfully defend or prosecute appeals, including up to $20,000 per plaintiff for various stages of review at the Supreme Court of Texas.

Late Friday, Brickman criticized Paxton’s intent to appeal the judgment in a post on X, calling the attorney general “ lawless and shameless” and claiming the judgment came because Paxton was avoiding a deposition.

“Paxton now wants to appeal? He literally already admitted he broke the law to @SupremeCourt_TX and the Travis County District Court — all to stop his own deposition,” Brickman wrote.

See here for the previous update. It took longer for the judgment to be announced than we had been led to believe, but whatever. There’s obviously a ton of backstory to all this, but remember that the reason we were still fighting it out over this settlement was because the original one, for $3.3 million, wasn’t approved by the Lege to be paid for in a separate appropriation because Ken Paxton refused to answer any questions about what happened. His refusal led to the House committee doing their own investigation, which in turn led to the impeachment and all of that mishegoss. Part of that was Paxton declaring that he would no longer contest any of the allegations made against him, again to avoid having to answer questions about the whole affair (and yes, I use that word deliberately), this time in a deposition.

The bottom line is that Paxton on the one hand says “fine, I’ll cop to whatever you guys say” and on the other hand claims they’re lying, all because he does not want to answer any questions about what happened. He’s desperate to avoid answering questions. Whatever happens, from this point forward, this fact should be relentlessly brought up and thrown in his face. Whatever we Democrats can do to get these whistleblowers out there in public saying what a dirtbag sleazeball Ken Paxton is, we have to do it. This is the closest thing to any accountability for his behavior he has faced. We have to ride it all the way.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

US and Mexico get 2031 Women’s World Cup

Excellent.

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has confirmed that the United States-Mexico and the United Kingdom are the sole respective bidders for the 2031 and 2035 Women’s World Cups.

Infantino made the announcement on Thursday at the 49th UEFA Congress in Belgrade, Serbia. Should a compliant bid be submitted by the end of 2025, this will pave the way for the UK to host the Women’s World Cup for the first time. The U.S. last hosted in 2003, having previously done so four years earlier, while Mexico has never staged games.

The Football Associations of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland announced in March they would be submitting a collective expression of interest to host the 2035 tournament, seemingly leaving the U.S. and Mexico as the sole bidders for 2031.

U.S. Soccer and the Mexican Soccer Federation announced last April their intention to lodge a joint bid for the 2031 tournament. The two federations withdrew their bid for the 2027 World Cup — which will be staged in Brazil — to instead focus on 2031.

At March’s FIFA council meeting, football’s international governing body had invited federations affiliated to UEFA or the Confederation of African Football (CAF) to bid for the 2035 tournament. Reports in Spain had suggested Spain, Morocco and Portugal were planning to launch a rival bid for 2035 but the UK was described as the only “valid” bid by Infantino. Spain, Morocco and Portugal will jointly host the men’s competition in 2030.

The Athletic reported in March that the U.S.-Mexico bid was exploring staging matches in Costa Rica and Jamaica. Sources familiar with discussions, speaking on the condition of anonymity, indicated early-stage conversations about hosting a limited amount of fixtures in the two Concacaf countries had taken place.

See here and here for some background, and here for the US Soccer statement. It is of course my hope that Houston will be able to host some of these games, as they are hosting 2026 Men’s World Cup games. I’ll be looking for stories to that effect, and will plot to attend some games if and when that happens.

Posted in Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on US and Mexico get 2031 Women’s World Cup

Malik appointed to HCDE Board

Of interest.

Silky Malik

Silky Joshi Malik has been unanimously appointed to Harris County Department of Education’s (HCDE) Board of Trustees. Malik will fulfill the remainder of the term for Position 7, At-Large, which expires in December 2026. The seat was previously held by David Brown, who stepped down in January 2025.

HCDE Trustees voted on Malik’s appointment during a special board meeting on March 31. Malik will be sworn in to the board in the coming weeks.

“I am eager to bring my personal experiences and professional skills to the Harris County Department of Education and look forward to the opportunity to contribute to its continued success,” said Malik. “As a Houston native, I’ve spent my life seeing all the ways this city shows up for one another, and the work being done by HCDE is no exception.”

As a former educator and researcher, U.S. congressional candidate and current Ph. D. candidate with a focus on public policy, Malik has developed a nuanced understanding of educational systems and the dynamics of policy making and advocacy. She has also served as a board member for organizations such as Annie’s List Training Fund, which provided governance skills and experience in strategic oversight.

Find more information on the HCDE Board of Trustees here.

Brown was elected in 2020, doing us all the favor of ousting Don Sumners from the At Large seat. Malik was as noted a candidate for CD02 in 2018; here’s the interview I did with her in the primary. Congratulations on the appointment and best of luck on the Board.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Malik appointed to HCDE Board

Weekend link dump for April 6

“Two, even if there were no government guidance on Signal usage, it doesn’t change the fact that the error that led to Signalgate is not Signal’s fault. To imply otherwise, as Trump did, is not just to deny reality—it is to engage in a dangerous, long-running propaganda campaign that could undermine the very foundations of privacy in modern American society.”

“Here are the five key pillars of actual Trumpian repression so far”.

“It’s not just that they’re hypocrites — oh, but they are! — it’s that they’re also cheap hypocrites. These people will scream about THE FIRST AMENDMENT one day, then go full-on word police the next, all because someone offered them some bitcoin and handed them a script. There’s no principle, consistency, or actual belief system — it’s just a rotating menu of outrage for hire.”

“The Looney Tunes frog was based on a true story“.

“You do work for your community because it makes the world a better place.”

“Crypto is in ascendance—and to understand what it is, and how it works, is foundational to understanding the great American scam that’s currently playing out right in front of all of us in the White House and beyond. You can’t grasp the reality of the second Trump presidency if you don’t start here.”

Please stop freaking out about the “torpedo bats”. They’re completely legal, teams other than the Yankees are using them, and we don’t have nearly enough data to know if they even make a difference. Also, you still have to, you know, actually hit the ball.

“Here’s my take: Don’t damn the torpedoes. Just let the hitters have their bulbous bats. They need all the help they can get.”

“Every bat has a sweet spot, and every batter’s goal should be to just barely miss it.”

“This story explores a slew of recent actions by the Trump administration that threaten to undermine all five pillars of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees freedoms concerning speech, religion, the media, the right to assembly, and the right to petition the government and seek redress for wrongs.”

“And let’s not forget: In terms of the trade deficit, there’s a service surplus. What is the service surplus made of? Tourism, education, medical care. We export that stuff, and they’re directly attacking that. They’re directly attacking all of the sources of our service surplus.”

“But over the years it will have a profoundly negative impact. You’re creating an opportunity for other countries to happily start moving in, poaching our talent and riding the escalator of scientific progress.”

RIP, Richard Chamberlain, three-time Golden Globe-winning actor best known for Dr. Kildare, The Thorn Birds, and the original miniseries of Shōgun.

“Seriously, stop doing this! Not just the press but individual people who will make the decision about the future of this country.”

“The restructuring announced last week is part of Trump, Musk, and RFK’s sustained assault on HHS and public health generally–an assault that will ensure that people lead shorter lives, that their lives will be worse, and that they will be easier pray for fraudsters and charlatans selling products with bogus health claims. The restructuring is yet another gratuitous insult to the hard-working HHS career staff who have been serving the people in extremely difficult conditions. These are highly skilled people who have sacrificed enormously of time and money so they can serve the public in some of the most essential ways, in some of the most stressful conditions imaginable. They deserve our thanks and praise, not mass firings.”

RIP, John Thornton, co-founder of the Texas Tribune. He was a Trinity alum, in the class one year ahead of me, and was the mentor for my freshman group. Good guy, down to earth, did a fine job making us feel welcome at our new school. Got to talk to him again years later at some early Trib events, still the same friendly and affable guy. I rely a lot on Trib stories here, it’s a vital addition to the media landscape. It’s also a tremendous legacy that he leaves, and I wish he had more time to enjoy it. Rest in peace, John Thornton.

“DOGE Moves to Gut CDC Work on Gun Injuries, Sexual Assault, Opioid Overdose Data, and More”.

“For decades, Democrats were told that confronting entrenched corporate power too forcefully would provoke donor flight, destabilize markets, and invite political defeat. But now they watch Trump destabilize the economy, berate institutions, undermine global stability—and encounter, remarkably, little institutional resistance. The promised backlash if Democrats pushed too hard never materializes, even as Trump tramples through the executive suites.”

Man, fuck Pat McAfee to hell and back.

A scary encounter with a foul ball at a recent Yankees game.

RIP, Val Kilmer, actor and star of many excellent movies, of which my favorite is Real Genius.

RIP, Patty Maloney, actor who may have been best known for playing Chewbacca’s son Lumpy on The Star Wars Holiday Special. A little person who was a frequent performer on various Sid & Marty Krofft shows, she was often cast alongside Billy Barty. Mark Evanier has a nice remembrance of her.

“The Trump administration’s actions here have hurt American prosperity in ways that liberals would point out—by failing to invest in public services, you produce a worse educated and less healthy population, which is a drag on economic growth—but also in ways that conservatives would point out, like “stupidly breaking the parts of the government that allow our financial markets to function smoothly with no apparent plan.” This is not “populism” any more than a bite from an alligator is a kiss. This is just nihilism.”

“The [federal] government aims to cut funding for safer streets. Here’s who would be hurt most.”

“With tariffs, Trump can exercise a kind of corruption that the country hasn’t experienced in some 150 years—a kind of control that is ultimately incompatible with both democracy and prosperity.”

“Waltz’s team set up at least 20 Signal group chats for crises across the world”. No word yet on how many journalists were accidentally added to them.

A Canadian political view of the tariff psychodrama.

“No fun in Trumpland: Video games, toys, and more take hit by tariffs”.

“This is the most consistent pattern of the Trump era, the quest to divine some underlying plan or theory when all it really is is a degenerate huckster following his gut. It’s retcon, retcon, retcon all the way down.”

“Torpedo bats are the craze right now”.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekend link dump for April 6

Abbott finally says something about CD18

And of course it’s stupid and insulting.

Gov. Greg Abbott has blamed his delay in calling an election to replace U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner on election issues in Harris County, he recently told Austin’s KXAN.

Abbott has faced criticism for the past month for failing to call an election to fill Turner’s empty seat representing Texas’ 18th Congressional District. On Saturday, the solidly Democratic district in Houston will have gone a month without representation.

[…]

In an interview with KXAN, Abbott said “there’s going to be a time” to call the election.

“That election is in Harris County, and Harris County is a repeat failure as it concerns operating elections,” Abbott said. “Had I called that very quickly, it could’ve led to a failure in that election just like Harris County has failed in other elections.”

Harris County’s elections office in 2022 found itself in hot water after 20 of around 800 voting locations across the county ran out of paper. The paper shortage led to lawmakers in Austin eradicating the elections administrator position in Harris County, as well as more than 20 other lawsuits filed by local GOP candidates.

Abbott added that Harris County needed to have “adequate time” to operate a “fair and accurate” election instead of a “crazy” one.

Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth wrote on X Friday that her office had run eight successful elections since the duty of holding them was handed over to the clerk.

“We remain fully prepared to conduct the Congressional District 18 election as soon as the governor issues the order,” Hudpseth wrote.

Acting County Attorney Christian Menefee – the first to toss his name into the ring for the position – was quick to call out Abbott on X Friday afternoon, calling his excuse “nonsense” and saying that had the governor called an election earlier, Harris County’s elections office would have adequate time to prepare.

Menefee on Monday also threatened legal action against Abbott if he didn’t call a special election before November. Since then, the House Democrats and the Texas Democrats have also threatened lawsuits against the governor should the election continue to be delayed.

First, nobody runs elections better than Teneshia Hudspeth, so shame on you for that. Second, if you wanted to be less of a dick about it, you could say “and so I’ll be ordering it for November on Monday, look for my order then”, and we’d at least be able to put the question to rest. That would still be a ridiculous and obviously politically-motivated decision, but it would at least be consistent with the dumb claim about Harris County, which ran six elections last year in part to the new Republican law about Tax Assessment District boards, needing the time. At least give us the courtesy of a more plausible lie.

But whatever. Abbott’s an asshole who only cares about his benefactors, we all knew that. Christian Menefee, Hakeem Jeffries, Jolanda Jones et al (I missed that one before), file those lawsuits. Potential plaintiffs are standing by. File away!

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

More on Austin Street, Whitmire, and bike lanes

Gonna do this as a link roundup so I can get this out of my system. See here for the starting point.

Whitmire stresses maintaining public safety as fears grow over future of Houston’s bike lanes.

Emphasizing his priority toward public safety, Mayor John Whitmire addressed growing concerns over the city’s commitment to bike lanes at a news conference Wednesday, two days after workers began tearing up a bike lane on Austin Street without notice.

The discussion came amid a series of controversies surrounding Houston’s bike lanes.

The city removed protective barriers, known as “armadillos,” from bike lanes in the Heights, citing maintenance concerns.

Meanwhile, Monday’s removal of the Austin Street bike lane in Midtown has sparked debate over the balance between infrastructure improvements and bike accessibility. These actions have fueled tensions among cyclists, city officials, and residents over the future of Houston’s mobility network.

Whitmire also answered questions about the bike lane on 11th Street in the Heights, a popular street for cyclists that features bike lanes on both sides. Community members fear it may be the next to be removed.

Whitmire said businesses, residents, and a local doughnut shop have expressed concerns about the 11th Street bike lane, prompting a review of its impact. He cited past emails from fire department officials warning that emergency response times could improve if the bike lane were removed.

“I don’t go looking to create disagreement; I like to think I’m a consensus builder, trying to do the best job,” Whitmire said. “But when I have fire department officials tell me, ‘We won’t go down 11th, we go down 10th, a residential neighborhood,’ because of parked cars and narrow space, that’s not my controversy. I’m just trying to solve it.”

When a reporter suggested it sounded like he planned to remove the bike lane, Whitmire said that he is listening to the public and public safety officials.

“It’s all driven by public safety,” Whitmire said.

Such transparent bullshit, I can’t tell you how mad this makes me. I know, the world is on fire, Trump and Musk are actively destroying the federal government and the United States’ standing in the world as well as its economic engines, Greg Abbott and Dan Patrick and the Lege are doing the same for Texas, and so on and so forth. I guess I feel this the most directly right now, and I’m angry about the casual disrespect for anyone that doesn’t already agree with Whitmire. He’s been so much worse as Mayor than I thought he’d be when he was elected. For crying out loud, public safety includes the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists too!

Deep breath.

BikeHouston director critical of Mayor Whitmire’s removal of bike lanes.

BikeHouston Executive Director Joe Cutrufo said Wednesday he believes Houstonians support more cyclist infrastructure — not less.

Cutrufo’s comments came the day after Houston Mayor John Whitmire criticized the backlash from cyclist and pedestrian advocates over the Austin Street bike lane removal during a Tuesday appearance on Houston Public Media’s Hello Houston show, and said they did not represent the majority opinion of Houstonians.

“I think he has selective hearing as far as that goes, but you know who does a really good job of listening to Houstonians, the Rice Kinder Houston Area survey,” Cutrufo said, speaking Wednesday on Hello Houston. “What they found was that 50% of Harris County residents … would be willing to live in a smaller home if it meant they could walk places more easily. They found that 52% of Houstonians want to be able to ride a bike more often than they currently do.”

Cutrufo also argued that Whitmire had a “moral obligation” to ensure that residents were safe, regardless of their mode of transportation. He specifically mentioned the recent removal of physical protections, known as “armadillos,” along Heights Boulevard.

“What we’re hearing is that the mayor has no intention of putting back any protection for people on bikes and that’s really unfortunate, not just as someone who rides a bike, but as a Houstonian because everyone benefits when we make streets safer for people on bikes,” Cutrufo said. “The mayor may not agree with our perspective and our perspective is additive. We believe that Houstonians should have more options just as the Rice Kinder Houston Area survey shows people want more options.”

A spokesperson for Whitmire previously told Houston Public Media that the armadillos were being removed due to “safety issues and disrepair in several spots, including exposed bolts.” The spokesperson did not clarify if new protections would be installed.

Regarding the removal of the Austin Street bike lanes, Cutrufo said the decision did not make financial sense.

“The stuff that has been built, Frank, had been paid for already,” Cutrufo said to Hello Houston co-host Frank Billingsley. “He is tearing it out. That costs money, too. … Maintaining it costs a lot less than tearing it out and having to repave Austin Street, which was just paved only five years ago.”

Fiscal responsibility, baby. Which leads to this:

Pivoting, Whitmire says Austin Street will get a dedicated bike lane, but no physical barrier.

After a week of public backlash, Houston Mayor John Whitmire announced that the Austin Street rehabilitation project will now include a dedicated bike lane modeled after the one on Heights Boulevard—reversing earlier plans to replace the protected lane with sharrows, or shared lane markings.

The new plan includes an unprotected, one-way bike lane, a compromise that maintains some level of dedicated space for cyclists but without a physical barrier. Construction crews had already begun tearing up the old protected bike lane on Monday before the mayor’s office made the change public Thursday in an interview with the Houston Chronicle Editorial Board.

“I was briefed by all the parties,” Whitmire said during the interview. “It’s going to improve the mobility and the access of the homeowners and certainly the fire station and it will allow the bike lane to continue. It’s been modified to follow the Heights model.”

[…]

Joe Cutrufo, executive director of BikeHouston, said a dedicated bike lane is an improvement over sharrows but still lacks meaningful protection.

“When people on bikes are forced to share space with multi-ton motorized vehicles, then they are vulnerable and reliant on whoever is behind the wheel,” Cutrufo said. “When a driver isn’t paying attention and they’re sharing the road with people on bikes, it’s the people on bikes who lose every time.”

Asked whether the mayor’s reversal signals broader changes to future infrastructure decisions, Cutrufo said Whitmire is clearly hearing from the public.

“We know that the mayor has heard from hundreds of Houstonians since his unilateral decision to rip out the protected bike lane on Austin Street this past Monday,” he said.

Imagine if he had talked to, or more to the point listened to, someone outside of his bubble before Monday. We could have avoided this whole stupid, expensive mess.

In re: the Chron Editorial Board.

The Austin Street bike lane was just one piece of a much larger yearslong effort to transform the city’s outdoor spaces. It connected the Buffalo Bayou Park trails with paths through Hermann Park and along Brays Bayou. Some of Houston’s bike lanes suddenly evaporate just when you need them most. Not this one. The Austin bike lane was the spine of Houston’s growing network of safe and comfortable paths. It was central to a vision for a city where people can move around safely whether by car, foot, bicycle or wheelchair.

After news of the lane’s removal circulated, bicyclists showed up to Tuesday’s City Council public comment session to share their frustration. Fincham was one of them.

Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis was angry about the news too. Ellis’s office paid around $2 million to build the Austin Street lane. “Why are you eliminating things that are making streets safer?” he puzzled to the editorial board in reaction to Monday’s news.

After the City Council meeting Wednesday, Mayor John Whitmire insisted that removing the bike lanes was about public safety, that he had been asked by the area’s councilmember right after being sworn in as mayor to take a look at it. He also said that the city is working on a new bike plan. He said he couldn’t yet reveal the plan’s details, but that it will be “major.” His critics weren’t convinced.

Their pushback worked. Sort of. By Thursday afternoon, the mayor and public works department had a new plan. Rather than remove the protected lane entirely, the mayor told the editorial board, it would replace what was a two-way lane with a one-way bike lane, matching the flow of car traffic. And instead of concrete curbs, cyclists would be separated from cars with a stripe of paint.

Like the bike lane on Heights Boulevard.

“We’re convinced we’ve got a good model now,” Whitmire said.

We, however, are not convinced.

[…]

The mayor had said residents along Austin St. complained about lost parking, difficulty with their garbage bins out and confusion over a two-way bike lane on a one-way street.

We’ve got some more feedback for him.

Hundreds of people — drivers, bikers and pedestrians — die on Houston’s streets every year. In 2024, Whitmire’s first year in office, that number went up after two years of declines: Some 345 people died on Houston’s roads. Nearly 2,000 were injured. Roughly a third of fatalities were people killed outside of a vehicle. These aren’t just along feeder roads. In fact, 250 fatal crashes occurred on roadways with speed limits under 50 mph;, 140 of those were on streets with speed limits under 30 mph. While cyclist deaths were down to 8, the number of riders seriously injured went up. Houston bike advocates regularly point out that no bike riders have ever died in a crash on a road with protected bike lanes.

That’s because protected bike lanes consistently make roads safer for all users — including people in cars. The city’s own data from Austin Street and other stretches with added bike lanes show that injuries from crashes dropped 17% on Austin between Holman Street and Commerce Street after the lane was added in 2020, according to the city’s 2022 Vision Zero report. One of the more comprehensive and recent studies, done by researchers at the University of Colorado Denver and the University of New Mexico, looked at protected bike lanes across 12 major cities, including Houston, and found that overall road fatality rates dropped by as much as 75%.

Protected bike lanes can be part of what’s called a “road diet,” intentional designs that slow cars to a safer speed.

Though the mayor and public works head said Thursday they’re always open to hear “new” information, the city has already torn up infrastructure without much warning. The city didn’t have to wait until this week to hear these concerns: Before a street redesign, everyone could have been asked more transparently for comment. Yes, the people who complained have valid concerns. But public engagement is supposed to include the entire public. And acting in the public interest requires balancing everyone’s concerns, ideally before the acting part.

See also the letter from 106 moms urging the Mayor to take bike safety seriously, or at all.

And finally: City official says Austin Street bike lane hindered HFD — firefighters say they used it.

Houston officials say an Austin Street bike lane interfered with firefighter training at Station 7, justifying its removal as part of a controversial street rehabilitation project.

But the Houston Fire Department says firefighters regularly trained in that space — until construction forced them to move.

“Each fire station has different access to public space for training, depending on the neighborhood,” said HFD Communications Director Brent Taylor. “At Station 7, firefighters perform apparatus training, such as deploying the aerial ladder or practicing cab operations, in the space where road maintenance is now underway. Our firefighters will accommodate the work by moving this training to another nearby location.”

Taylor added that the fire department has maintained a positive relationship with residents who use the Austin Street bike lane, “along with anyone else who passes the station.”

The least you can do is get your story straight first. If you want more, listen to Evan Mintz go off on Friday’s CityCast Houston podcast. I’m going to go for a walk and calm down now.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Yeah, that’s too many candidates

There are how many people running for Mayor of San Antonio?!?

Mayor Ron Nirenberg

San Antonio is barreling toward the most bizarre mayoral election in recent memory.

A massive field of 27 candidates has no clear frontrunners. State and national PAC money is flowing into the race while local groups remain on the sidelines. Meanwhile, the rare opportunity to lead a blue city in a red state has both Republicans and Democrats salivating over the traditionally nonpartisan office.

Weeks from the start of early voting in the May 3 election, it’s the exact scenario some local political strategists say they’ve long worried about leading up to a pivotal race.

San Antonio hasn’t elected a new mayor since 2017 and whoever replaces term-limited Mayor Ron Nirenberg will immediately inherit a city at a crossroads. They’ll be responsible for the city’s approach to major economic development projects, as well as an increasingly precarious social safety net and fraying relationships with state and federal leaders.

Yet years of well-intentioned policy decisions aimed at making local elections more fair have backfired — creating a confusingly crowded race in which money is more critical than ever to break from the pack.

This year Rolando Pablos, who served as Texas Secretary of State under GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, became the face of the a multi-million dollar effort to build a bench of conservative allies in the state’s historically blue urban centers.

And Gina Ortiz Jones, who was Democrats’ nominee for two high-profile congressional races, has the backing of national Democrats who’ve become desperate to keep Texas from falling further from their party’s reach.

The long list of candidates also includes a number of local elected officials, business leaders and activists with pockets of supporters behind them — meaning it’s unlikely any of the candidates will take the 50% support required to avoid a June 7 runoff.

With few opportunities left to differentiate themselves through message alone, candidates are running out of time to make their cases.

“I think there’s seven candidates that have a shot,” said former mayor and Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolff, one of the few local officials who has offered up an endorsement in the race, in reference to four sitting councilmembers, Pablos and Ortiz Jones, plus political newcomer Beto Altamirano, his pick.

“But as you come down to the election, it depends on how much money they’ve got at the end.”

Twenty-seven candidates? My God. And for an election that’s happening in four weeks. All due respect, but they wouldn’t have the time to make their cases if the election were being held next November. Maybe the runoff will bring some clarity. Godspeed, my San Antonio friends.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Measles update: We’re already making this harder on ourselves

Here’s your weekend update.

The measles outbreak centered in the South Plains region soared past a combined 500 cases in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma on Friday, according to health officials.

Texas has seen 481 measles cases amid the outbreak that began in late January, according to the latest update from the state’s Department of State Health Services. Fifty-six people have been hospitalized and one unvaccinated child has died, the first measles death in the United States in a decade.

The outbreak continues to be concentrated in children who have not received the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, or whose vaccination status is unknown.

Health officials in New Mexico and Oklahoma have said cases in those states are also connected to the Texas outbreak.

New Mexico reported 54 cases on Friday, while Oklahoma reported 10. New Mexico has also reported one suspected measles death, an unvaccinated adult who tested positive for the virus after dying.

The latest DSHS update comes one day after Harris County health officials reported that a child with no recent travel history tested positive for measles. The testing was performed by a commercial laboratory and must be verified by DSHS. The case is not included in the DSHS update on Friday.

Texas has reported a total of six measles cases in 2025 that are not connected to the South Plains outbreak, including three in Houston and one in Fort Bend County. Most of those cases are associated with international travel, and they are not included in the Texas outbreak total of 481.

That’s an increase of 59 cases since the Tuesday update. It’s not slowing down.

Here’s more on that new Harris County case.

A child in northwest Harris County who had no recent travel history tested positive for measles, health officials said Thursday.

Harris County Public Health was notified Thursday that testing conducted by a commercial laboratory confirmed the child had measles, said Dr. Ericka Brown, the county’s local health authority. Investigators are still working to determine how the child was exposed to the virus, and whether the case is associated with the ongoing Texas outbreak that started in the South Plains region.

The Harris County child has since recovered from the illness and did not need to be hospitalized, Brown said during a media briefing.

The child received one dose of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine prior to the infection, Brown said. She declined to say whether the child is too young to have received a second dose, which the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends for children 4 to 6 years old.

Harris County Public Health launched a contact-tracing investigation to identify anyone who may have been exposed to the child, Brown said. She declined to say exactly how many individuals may have been exposed.

“We do know that obviously, because it is a child, there are family members who are involved, and we are investigating all contacts,” she said.

Brown said that, for the time being, she is not concerned the case will lead to substantial community spread in Harris County because about 94% of residents are protected by at least one dose of the MMR vaccine. That’s just under the threshold of 95% that public health experts say is necessary to achieve herd immunity, which prevents widespread outbreaks.

“Could we be better? Of course. We always strive for 100%,” Brown said. “But Harris County is doing pretty well in terms of their vaccinations.”

The story says that this is the first case of measles in unincorporated Harris County in over five years. The other two cases in the county were in Houston. None of them are related to the Gaines County outbreak, so they’re not in the official count of 481.

All this is happening as support for fighting measles and other infectious diseases is being cut.

Houston Health Department expects the Trump administration’s abrupt cancelation of a federal grant program started during COVID to punch a $42 million hole in its planned spending, including $12 million for personnel, as officials assess the potential impact on local public health.

In a statement, officials confirmed the loss of funding, but said they would have no further comment at this time, nor would they outline how the money was used.

“We are still assessing the full impact on our programs and services,” health department spokeswoman Tucker Wilson said.

In fiscal 2025, city health officials planned to spend $170.9 million on various programs and initiatives, of which $71 million was expected to come from state and federal grants.

Since 2020, Houston Health Department has received more than $400 million via various federal grant programs initiated during the pandemic to provide vaccines, address health disparities in low income areas and reopen schools following the global lockdown.

Federal officials informed Texas on March 24 that a number of COVID-era grant programs coordinated through the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration would end immediately. State officials were told, as of March 24, to halt all spending related to the programs funding immunizations, lab work and health disparities in low-income areas.

In Texas, more than $800 million in health department spending is affected, though the final totals remain uncertain. In a statement Tuesday, the Texas Health and Human Services Department said it was “working to a compile a list of affected programs and will have a list available soon.”

Other health departments in the Houston area also confirmed some funding losses, including Galveston County, which reported a loss of $2.7 million.

Here are a few headlines for you if you want some more of that:

Dozens of free measles vaccine clinics close in Texas as federal funding is cut. “Many clinics had been planned at schools in the Dallas area with low vaccination rates,” says the subhed.

As Texas Measles Outbreak Hits 422 Cases, Dallas County Cancels 50 Vaccine Events After DOGE Cuts. That sound you hear is Greg Abbott and Dan Patrick not saying a goddamn thing.

During a Past Measles Outbreak, RFK Jr. Dismissed Concern as “Hysteria”.

RFK Jr. fired veterinarians working on bird flu because he’s incompetent.

Oops! RFK Jr. scrambles to rehire essential employees fired by mistake. Do you feel healthy again yet, punk? Well, do you?

Meanwhile, in other states.

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment said in a statement late Monday a measles case was confirmed in an unvaccinated adult in Pueblo, Colorado, who recently traveled to an area of Mexico experiencing a measles outbreak—the state’s first confirmed measles case since 2023, according to The Denver Post.

In New Mexico, which has the second-highest number of measles cases in the country, Lea County is home to 52 of the state’s 54 confirmed measles cases, and is about 47 miles from Gaines County, Texas, where the majority of Texas’ measles cases have been detected.

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment reported 24 confirmed cases as of Wednesday and Jill Bronaugh, the department’s communications director, told Forbes genetic sequencing of one case is “consistent” with a link to outbreaks in Texas and New Mexico.

And here’s Ohio.

Two more people have contracted measles in Knox County, bringing the total number of infected individuals in that county to three, the county’s public health agency reported Monday.

A laboratory test conducted on March 29 found that the two infected people were international travelers in Knox County, Knox Public Health announced Monday in a news release. The two infected people have been quarantined, and their symptoms are being monitored.

Knox Public Health said they have been conducting contact tracing and found that no additional close contact was identified as a result of the positive cases.

[…]

The CDC considers three or more cases an outbreak. Ten reported cases in Ohio have been reported in Ashtabula County in the northeast corner of the state, and the three total now in Knox County represents a second outbreak. None of the people in the confirmed cases in Ohio were vaccinated against the disease.

They didn’t have a Friday update, so this is what we have for now. I’ll close with a profile of Katherine Wells, the oft-quoted health department director in Lubbock, where many of the patients that have been hospitalized are or have been.

Katherine Wells was tapping her phone.

It was the last week of January, and the director for the Lubbock Health Department had a jam-packed schedule. She was working with her team to put in place the new community health plan. Flu cases were on the rise. She had media interviews lined up to talk about stopping the spread.

She refreshed her email again. And there it was — confirmation that someone in nearby Gaines County had tested positive for measles. It was the first for the region in 20 years.

She took a deep breath.

Two months later, with more than 400 cases across Texas, Wells is the first to admit things feel eerily similar to the COVID-19 pandemic. And just like then — when police guarded her home after she received death threats — Wells’ work is facing questions from skeptics.

“People accuse me of creating the measles outbreak to make the health department look more important,” Wells said. She laughed as if she was used to it.

The reputations of public health institutions have taken a beating in the last five years as the pandemic became a political flashpoint. Some people saw public health leaders as heroes for urging people to wear masks, stay away from big crowds and get the vaccine. Others saw them as villains bent on robbing Americans of their freedoms.

Wells has served as the public health director for 10 years. Long before the measles outbreak and COVID, she navigated situations like Lubbock’s high sexually transmited infections and teen pregnancy rates. Lubbock is the largest city in Texas’ South Plains, with nearly 267,000 residents. It’s also largely conservative. More than 69% of Lubbock County voted for President Donald Trump last November.

Lubbock also stands as a critical medical hub for the South Plains, and Wells is the leader. With a dearth of rural hospitals, physicians, and limited care at clinics, people from all over the region flock to Lubbock for health care. This is how Lubbock became entangled in the measles outbreak. Most of the cases have been recorded in nearby rural Gaines County, where 280 cases have been identified. Patients have sought medical care in Lubbock.

Like many public health directors, most people didn’t know Wells until March 2020, when the city and the rest of the country was upended by the COVID pandemic. As she led the city through the crisis, she became a household name — for better or worse.

Probably mostly worse. And it won’t be any better this time around. I wish her and her colleagues all the best.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

TEA can release 2023 A-F accountability ratings

Of interest.

A judge ruled Thursday that the Texas Education Agency can release its 2023 A-F school accountability ratings for the state’s public school districts, overturning a previous injunction issued in response to a lawsuit from more than 120 districts.

The TEA typically assigns annual A-F ratings to each public school district and campus based on students’ standardized test performance, although it has not done so for all schools and districts in the state since 2019 due to COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing lawsuits.

The TEA updated the formula to calculate ratings starting in 2023, which included raising the bar that schools need to reach to qualify for higher letter grades. However, a judge initially blocked the TEA from officially assigning ratings after around 10% of the state’s roughly 1,200 districts argued that the agency did not provide enough advance notice about the changes.

Texas’ 15th Court of Appeals — a conservative-majority court created by lawmakers in 2023 to oversee appeals involving the state — reversed the lower court’s decision, arguing that the trial court could not block the ratings’ release and that TEA commissioner Mike Morath did not overstep his bounds in releasing accountability data past certain deadlines.

The TEA and a lawyer for the school districts did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the decision.

Because the formula was not released during the 2022-2023 school year, districts alleged that they were not able to adequately prepare their students.

The districts, which included Fort Worth and El Paso ISDs, also alleged that the 2022-2023 school ratings were not released by their Aug. 15 deadline and that the newly-redesigned STAAR tests factored into the ratings were not determined to be valid and reliable by an “independent” entity.

The Texas Education Code requires a commissioner to release A-F ratings for the prior school year by Aug. 15. The TEA did not release ratings by that deadline and had not done so when a judge issued a temporary injunction in October 2023.

However, no consequences were outlined for not making that deadline. The appeals court ruled that, since the TEA commissioner can eliminate A-F ratings in times of disaster, such as COVID-19, it is within his power to postpone them.

“Generally, a late decision on the merits is better than never,” the court wrote in an opinion by Chief Justice Scott Brister. “The clear legislative intent in Chapter 39 is to publish school ratings, not suppress them.”

School districts also argued that Morath acted beyond his power by releasing the standards used to measure schools after the 2022-2023 school year. According to Texas Education Code, the TEA should formally adopt and publish standards and explanatory materials “during the school year.”

The standards were not released until Oct. 31, 2023, although Morath asserted that schools were given preliminary standards during the prior school year. The court found that major indicators were known during the 2022-2023 year, while critical cutoff scores required to get an A, B, C, D or F rating were not.

“We agree that after a race is over not everyone can be declared the winner,” the court’s opinion read. “But it is not our role as judges to decide whether the Commissioner’s decisions were necessary or fair. The Districts’ burden … was to show the Commissioner acted ‘without legal authority,’ not that he should have exercised his discretion another way.”

[…]

The TEA still remains blocked from releasing the 2024 A-F accountability ratings due to a separate lawsuit from a smaller coalition of more than 30 school districts, including Pecos-Barstow-Toyah, Crandall, Forney, Fort Stockton and Kingsville ISDs.

The districts alleged that the STAAR tests underpinning the rankings were not properly designed and unfairly included the use of a new automated computer system to grade essay questions. Test results showed a sharp uptick in the number of zeroes scored on essay questions, prompting some critics to question whether the increase was due to the computer scoring.

However, the TEA has said the shift was unrelated to the new grading system and previously attributed the change to new scoring rubric and a higher test difficulty. A judge blocked the TEA from releasing the 2024 rankings in August, and the case remains pending with the 15th Court of Appeals.

Thursday’s ruling occurred two days after Houston ISD state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles testified in Austin in favor of Senate Bill 1962, which would amend the Texas Education Code to prevent school districts from challenging the state’s annual accountability ratings in court if passed.

I don’t think I wrote about the 2023 lawsuit, but I did note the ruling in the 2024 case, which as noted is still under review. HISD was not a party to either of these lawsuits and as you know released their own version of the accountability ratings each year. I don’t have anything to add to this, just passing it along. Texas 2036 and the Houston Landing have more.

Posted in Legal matters, School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Smaller number of federal buildings on the chopping block

Progress? I dunno.

Jill Karnicki/Houston Chronicle

Less than two weeks after posting – and abruptly pulling down – a list of federally owned office buildings to be sold, the U.S. General Services Administration has released a much shorter list that includes one property in Houston.

A fresh list of eight properties to be sold was posted on the GSA website, including two in Texas: the LaBranch Federal Building at 2320 LaBranch just south of downtown and the San Antonio Federal Building West on Cesar Chavez Boulevard in San Antonio.

“We are accelerating the disposition of the following assets,” the agency said on the site, and invited submissions of non-binding terms sheets for the properties.

Built in 1946 for the Veterans Administration, the LaBranch building now is home to local uniformed federal police.

The GSA, landlord for the federal government, on March 4 posted a list of properties it intended to sell on its website. The initial list contained more than 440 buildings across the U.S., including three in Houston and another 21 in Texas.

The roughly 75,000-square-foot LaBranch property was not among those in Houston targeted for sale in the initial list, which included the Mickey Leland Federal Building at 1919 Smith, the Alliance Tower at 8701 S. Gessner and the Houston Custom House, which fills an entire downtown block at 701 San Jacinto and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

See here for the background. It’s always hard to know how seriously to take these idiots, but if something is written down on an official website it does carry some weight. Under more normal circumstances, I’d allow for the possibility that this idea has merit regardless of my opinion of it, but we are way beyond the outer boundaries of the benefit of the doubt. Assume the worst, come to realize you didn’t assume worst enough, and go from there.

Posted in National news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Smaller number of federal buildings on the chopping block

Yeah, the Paxton federal prosecution was officially dropped

Please take several deep breaths before and as you read this.

Still a crook any way you look

The Justice Department quietly decided in the final weeks of the Biden administration not to prosecute Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, effectively ending the corruption investigation that cast a long shadow over the political career of a close ally of President Donald Trump, The Associated Press has learned.

The decision not to bring charges — which has never been publicly reported — resolved the high-stakes federal probe before Trump’s new Justice Department leadership could even take action on an investigation sparked by allegations from Paxton’s inner circle that the Texas Republican abused his office to aid a political donor.

The move came almost two years after the Justice Department’s public integrity section in Washington took over the investigation, removing the case from the hands of federal investigators in Texas who had believed there was sufficient evidence for an indictment.

Two people familiar with the matter, who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, confirmed the department’s decision to decline to prosecute. Though the date of the decision was not immediately clear, it was made in the final weeks of the President Joe Biden’s presidency, one of the people said.

Politically appointed Justice Department leadership was not involved in the decision, which was recommended by a senior career official who had concerns about prosecutors’ ability to secure a conviction, according to another person briefed on the matter. Political appointees are not typically involved in public integrity section matters to avoid the appearance of political interference.

[…]

The allegations against Paxton were stunning in part because of who made them.

Eight of his closest aides reported him to the FBI in 2020, accusing him of bribery and abusing his office to help one of his friends and campaign contributors, Nate Paul, who also employed a woman with whom Paxton acknowledged having had an extramarital affair. The same allegations led to Paxton’s impeachment on articles of bribery and abuse of public trust, but he was acquitted by the Republican-led Texas Senate, where his wife is a senator but did not cast a vote during the trial.

Paul pleaded guilty in January to a federal charge after he was accused of making false statements to banks to obtain more than $170 million in loans.

“After the November election, the DOJ accepted a guilty plea from Nate Paul and is apparently letting Ken Paxton escape justice,” TJ Turner and Tom Nesbitt, attorneys for two of the whistleblowers, said in a statement to the AP. “DOJ clearly let political cowardice impact its decision. The whistleblowers — all strong conservatives — did the right thing and continue to stand by their allegations of Paxton’s criminal conduct.”

The Justice Department’s public integrity section, which oversees public corruption cases, took over the Paxton investigation in 2023. The Justice Department has never publicly explained its decision to recuse the federal prosecutors in west Texas who had been leading the investigation. The move was pushed for by Paxton’s attorneys.

[…]

Grand jury records from 2021 obtained by The Texas Newsroom last year showed that federal authorities were investigating Paxton for several potential crimes, including bribery and witness retaliation. It’s unclear whether the scope or focus of the investigation changed when the public integrity section in Washington took it over.

During Paxton’s impeachment trial, former advisers testified that he pressured them to help the campaign donor, Paul, who was under FBI investigation. The testimony included arguments over who paid for home renovations, whether Paxton used burner phones and how his alleged extramarital affair became a strain on the office. Paxton decried the impeachment effort as a “politically motivated sham.”

I expected this outcome, but I figured it would be the Trump goons who did it. I can think of two valid reasons for it to have been done before they took over. One is that they gave the case one last final review and concluded that indeed they didn’t have sufficient evidence to get a conviction. I don’t really believe that, but it’s possible. Perhaps it would have been better to leave that decision up to the incoming administration, more as a matter of courtesy than anything else, but I’ve not been in that position before so I don’t know what the norms are. Not that norms matter much anymore anyway, but you get the point.

The other possibility I can think of is that by ending the case then, the files could be preserved so that the case could be revived in four years’ time, assuming no statute of limitations issues. I’m not sure I believe that either, and I’m not even sure it makes sense, but it’s what I came up with. Any other reason strikes me as complying in advance, and I’d rather not dwell on that.

The takeover of the case by the feds, when the local prosecutors seemed to be gearing up to move forward, is still the biggest and most frustrating puzzle of the whole situation. I’ll decline to speculate about that because it doesn’t serve a purpose, but boy would I love to hear from someone on the inside about what really went down. The email address is kuff at offthekuff.com if you’ve got some info to share, full anonymity granted.

Beyond that, I don’t know what ancient curse we’re all under that allows this asshole to keep on doing what he does, but here we are. I join with all decent people in hoping that someday that curse is broken. Reform Austin has more.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, Scandalized! | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Yeah, the Paxton federal prosecution was officially dropped

It looks like there’s no DaSean Jones do-over election on the May ballot

Here’s the May 3, 2025 Joint Election Fact Sheet that I got on Monday. You will notice that on page 2, where the participating entities are listed, that Harris County is not among them. There are MUDs and services districts, but no general Harris County election. Which is a little strange, since May 3, 2025 was the date set by the judge for the whiny sore loser re-do election, in which Republican Tami Pierce was to get a second shot at Criminal District Court Judge DaSean Jones, who won in 2022 by 449 votes.

Now I know there was an appeal, and there was an appellate court hearing in January. Here are all the case documents, with a timeline of their filings. I have to assume that at some point, the order to hold a new election was put on hold, but I can’t say when or by whom – there’s no such pause in the written opinion. So, given that the First Court did not issue an opinion of its own since that January hearing, the hold must still be in effect, and thus no May do-over election.

Now, we could get an appellate decision in time for a November 2025 election, but if we don’t, or if the hold remains in place, then it seems unlikely to me that it will ever happen. What would the point of having it in May 2026 even be? That doesn’t mean that the case will get dropped – there’s real value in winning for both sides, not to mention that a win by Tami Pierce would serve as at least part of a legal justification for the state taking over Harris County’s elections in the future. All I can say at this point is that there’s no election in May, and it seems unlikely to me that there will be one in the future. Given how this decision was based on an extremely faulty understanding of math and probability in the first place, that’s fine by me.

Posted in Election 2022, Election 2025, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Dispatches from Dallas, April 4 edition

This is a weekly feature produced by my friend Ginger. Let us know what you think.

This week, in news from Dallas-Fort Worth, the governor goes full Islamophobe; Dallas gets ready to pick a new police chief; Neiman Marcus in downtown Dallas gets a stay of execution; Tarrant County is about to do a mid-census redistricting; more fallout from the Keller ISD split and other school news; the effort to get Irving to pass the Sands casino plan that failed; the latest on Robert Roberson; is our local gas utility overcharging customers; the world’s richest woman lives in Fort Worth; the Sex Pistols are coming to Dallas (!); some Dallas chefs win big in competitions and awards; and more.

This week’s post was brought to you by the music of Sarah McLachlan, which I was reminded I hadn’t enjoyed in a while by the 1990s playlist of our anniversary dinner earlier this week.

The biggest local story in the Metroplex this week is the sudden but unsurprising attack on the EPIC City development near Josephine in Collin County. It’s a planned development to be built by the East Plano Islamic Center, and the DMN has a timeline of developments between the first announcement back in February and today. The only thing differentiating EPIC City from any number of other planned communities in the area is that it’s explicitly religious, specifically Muslim. EPIC and their for-profit developers have clarified that anyone is welcome to live in their community, in accordance with federal and state law, but that’s not good enough for Greg Abbott. He doesn’t want EPIC City, and to hell with the laws if they permit it.

Local media are pretty clear on what’s going on. The Dallas Observer headlines one story Abbott, Paxton Target Proposed Muslim Development in North Texas (though the URL reads “wage war”). KERA points out that “Abbott did not specify what laws may have been be violated” in his rants about EPIC City and threats against lawbreakers. And a public meeting on Monday to discuss this development, before any plans have been submitted, Collin County residents complained about the development, often on explicitly religious grounds. Lone Star Left has 10 minutes of video of these folks, which I admit I haven’t watched, because MAGA bigots are going to MAGA and life’s too short. Michelle Davis of Lone Star Left throws bombs occasionally, but she’s not wrong here: this is flat out bigotry and Governor Abbott is whistling for dogs to hear.

I wish the folks at EPIC all the luck in the world. They’re not even finished doing flood studies, and the entirety of Collin County’s officialdom and the Governor of Texas are trying to destroy their project. We all know if a church was building this project with a Christian school, the same folks would be praising it to the skies and easing its path. The official response to EPIC City is an embarrassment to the state of Texas.

Let’s look at the rest of the news:

  • The City of Dallas is about to pick a new top cop from a field of five candidates. The Dallas Observer and KERA have the details on the five. Two, including Interim Chief Michael Igo, are internal, and three are outsiders. Good luck to them all, and to those of us who live in Dallas.
  • We’re going to need that luck, because Dallas HERO is demanding that the city comply with Prop U immediately or they’re going to sue. One of the sections of Prop U, one of the charter amendments that passed last year, requires the city to maintain a level of staffing compared to the population that would currently require about 4,000 officers. Dallas needs to hire about 900 police to get there. To do so with minimal disruption, the city plans to hire 300 this year. My fellow citizens voted to hand the HERO clowns power over the city and they’re about to get what they voted for good and hard.
  • A story I’ve been watching is the demise of the downtown Neiman Marcus here in Dallas as part of their merger with Saks. It was supposed to close at the end of March, but the store, and its local favorite Zodiac restaurant, have received a reprieve through the 2025 holiday season. Get the story from KERA, local real estate site Candy’s Dirt, D Magazine, and the ever-optimistic DMN. And if you’re interested in the Zodiac Room, check out the Dallas Observer and some oral history from Eater Dallas.
  • Tarrant County County Judge Tim O’Hare gave the State of the County address this week. As one might expect, his big achievement has been cutting taxes. He also wants to steal the Stars and any other business he can get his hands on from Dallas. Things he did not talk about: his reactionary activism.
  • Tarrant County has had to hire a new lawyer for one of the jailers in the Anthony Johnson, Jr. case. Johnson died in the Tarrant County Jail last April and the county has to pay for outside counsel since the jailer may also face criminal charges. If the full $30,000 approved for the new lawyer is paid out, the county will have paid $615,000 to defend itself and the jailers.
  • Meanwhile, Tarrant County commissioners voted along party lines to look into redistricting and hire an “dedicated to election integrity” to start work on it. Redistricting isn’t required until the 2030 census, but two of the commissioners are up for re-election in 2026 and so is County Judge Tim O’Hare. More on this story from KERA.
  • In unrelated news, the Tarrant County Democratic Party laid off all its staff and is “strategically restructuring”. Something I didn’t know until this year is that county Democratic parties in Texas are all independent and the state party doesn’t have a say in their finances, though maybe that will change under the newly elected chair of the state party. So this is bad, but it doesn’t affect any other county party.
  • Because he’s not busy enough chasing the supposed crimes of EPIC City, Attorney General Ken Paxton is trying to get Dallas ISD over supposedly violating the state ban on transgender athletes. Technically it’s only a ban on kids playing as anything other than what’s on their birth certificate, but you know what they mean. Pick your source: the Dallas Observer, KERA, or the Texas Tribune.
  • In the aftermath of its failed attempt to break up, Keller ISD is considering cuts to deal with the $9.4 million budget shortfall it anticipates for the 2025-2026 school year. Meanwhile, the HOA that sued the district over about violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act to develop the split plan has asked a judge to remove the five board members who planned the split, including the board president.
  • Libs of Tik Tok found a trans teacher in Red Oak ISD, south of Dallas, and did their thing. She resigned to protect her students after receiving threats and demands for her firing. She’s not the first area teacher forced out by the bullies at Libs of Tik Tok; they also got a teacher who wore a dress for a spirit day in Lewisville.
  • The Star-Telegram has noticed that destroying DART will affect the Trinity Railway Express that connects Dallas and Fort Worth and might affect World Cup plans, and they do not like it.
  • Apparently a PAC created by the Sands casino juggernaut was behind a massive text spam to get Irving to approve a casino site near the old Texas Stadium site. Also pushing for the casino: Texans for Fiscal Responsibility, which is run by Michael Quinn Sullivan, formerly of Empower Texans. The DMN also has a list of entities against the casino, including The Texas Anti-Predatory Gambling Alliance, Texas Values, and the University of Dallas, which is a Catholic university near the casino site. The casino element was stripped from the plan in an Irving city council meeting last month.
  • A tragic story from Frisco this week: on Wednesday, a 17-year-old student was stabbed to death at a UIL track meet. The alleged killer, another 17 year old, was in custody. It’s too soon to know much right now, but of course, consider your mental health if you want to read the link.
  • The DMN has an explainer about how the town of Fairfield and the LDS (Mormon) church got into a fight about the size of the local temple’s steeple.
  • A Tesla owner whose car was keyed at DFW Airport has sued the alleged culprit for $1 million for property damage, emotional distress, etc. The alleged culprit was booked into the Tarrant County Jail for criminal mischief.
  • The DMN has an editorial about parking minimums favoring a new proposal that would eliminate them downtown, near rail stations, and at commercial and industrial sites that aren’t near residences and lowering them elsewhere. Reforming the Dallas parking ordinance has been on the agenda for a while now. I guess this means the Powers That Be have come to a conclusion unless Dallas HERO interferes.
  • This week Dallas County approved a $20,000 independent review of the autopsy findings in the Robert Roberson case. When Roberson’s daughter Nikki was found unresponsive, she was airlifted to Dallas and died in a hospital here. It was the Dallas County medical examiner who ruled her death a homicide. D Magazine also has the story.
  • The DMN’s watchdog is trying to figure out whether Atmos, our local gas utility, is overcharging its customers. The answer, unsurprisingly to me as a customer, is they’re so damn secretive nobody can tell.
  • Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson started the Republican Mayors Association back in 2023 after he switched parties. Now it turns out senior officials and members of the board of the association are also working for companies that receive contracts from it. No comment from Mayor Johnson, of course.
  • You may recall that the Texas Observer busted local ICE prosecutor Jim Rodden as the Xitter racist GlomarResponder. Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Forth Worth) demanded that ICE investigate him. He now has ICE’s response and the Observer has the details, which are mostly “we’ll get back to you in six months”. ICE has also stopped emailing the schedule of cases with prosecutors’ names to private attorneys. The DC bar, where Rodden is licensed, won’t confirm whether they’re doing anything about him either.
  • Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas has dropped Southwestern Health Resources, which is the umbrella organization for UT Southwestern and Texas Health, from its network. They do this every so often when they can’t agree on fees. Fortunately my doctor’s office confirmed that my BCBS insurance runs through another state so I’m still insured for my appointment. This time, anyway; last time we got the letter after the fact, when our BCBS and Southwestern Health had already kissed and made up.
  • Some of the world’s richest people live in the Metroplex, although they’re probably less rich today than they were when these articles were written. D Magazine and the Dallas Observer have the details from the Forbes list, and the Star-Telegram would like to remind you that the richest woman in the world, Alice Walton of Wal-Mart money, chose Fort Worth for her home.
  • You’ll probably have the same response to this that I did: the Sex Pistols are coming back to the Longhorn Ballroom. Apparently the three surviving members who aren’t Johnny Rotten are giving it another go with a new lead singer. Tickets are on sale on Friday morning, so probably about the time you’re reading this post.
  • Yayoi Kusama’s All the Eternal Love I Have for the Pumpkins mirror room is returning to the Dallas Museum of Art in May. It’ll be on view until next January, so you have time to come see it. This is not my favorite mirror room, but they’re all something special even if you don’t want to take a photo for the gram.
  • The Dallas wound that never closes: there is yet another congressional task force asking who killed John F. Kennedy after the recent release of documents. Because Congress had nothing better to do this week.
  • The tenth Texas State Veterans Home opened in Fort Worth last week. It’s named after the Tuskegee Airmen, the U.S. military’s WWII Black flying unit.
  • In Sherman, close to the Oklahoma border, the state has put up a historical marker for the 1930 lynching of George Hughes and the subsequent riot and destruction of the Black business district. The KERA story has an interview with a descendant of a survivor of the events.
  • Two food stories to wind things down: the James Beard finalists include some Dallas names. The one that most intrigues me from this list is Mabo, the yakitori omokase; I ate at Teppo, the chef’s previous restaurant, with friends, and it was fantastic. And a Dallas chef took second place at the World Food Championship, after signing up for the vegetarian challenge because it was the only spot left. Congratulations to our local winners!
Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Dispatches from Dallas, April 4 edition

Another lawsuit threatened for CD18

File away, I say.

Rep. Sylvester Turner

Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Wednesday that House Democrats will “very likely” sue if Texas Gov. Greg Abbott continues to hold off on calling a special election for the Houston-area seat of the late Congressman Sylvester Turner.

Texas law does not require Abbott to call a special election within a certain time period. He technically has the power to call an emergency special election at any time. Turner, the former Houston mayor and longtime state legislator, died in early March.

Abbott’s other options include calling a special election for the midterm election in November or declining to do anything and allowing the seat to remain vacant until 2026.

Jeffries made the comment during a weekly press conference Wednesday but did not elaborate on when a potential suit would be filed.

[…]

Acting Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee, who is running for the Congressional seat, on Monday also threatened to sue if Abbott did not call the election. He said he was asking for Abbott to set the election to coincide with the regularly scheduled June 7 runoff election, as the governor already missed the deadline to set it for May 3.

See here for the previous update, in which Menefee made his lawsuit threat. I say get those suits filed, especially if the goal is to get the election in June, because the clock is ticking – the latest date on which a June 7 election could be called is probably around May 1. Courts can only move so quickly, so no time to lose. I get that this is not so easy in practice, and one wants to have the best argument one can going in, but like it or not you’re on the clock.

And on the subject of Greg Abbott’s “options”, let me remind everyone again that the law in question says that the election “SHALL BE ORDERED as soon as practicable after the vacancy occurs”. “Shall” is an important word in the law, it means something is required, not optional. What “as soon as practicable” means is either something we let Greg Abbott decide or we get a judge to decide. You know what I think.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Tariffs are not good for beer

It’ll cost you more to drown your sorrows.

Just getting a beer in Texas could become more expensive under President Donald Trump’s plan to impose tariffs on essentially every country in the world.

While most industries are bracing for Trump’s tariff announcement from the White House on Wednesday, the brewpub industry is particularly worried because so many of their supplies come from outside the U.S.

Texas has more than 400 craft brewers. They are already facing higher costs for cans because of 25% tariffs Trump imposed on aluminum, half of which is imported and most of it from Canada.

Almost all steel kegs used in the U.S. are made in Germany. And Canada is a major supplier of both barley and malt — essential ingredients for brewers. If Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on Canada and Germany, all those products would get more expensive.

In short, what exactly Trump rolls out on Wednesday will have a big impact on an industry that was already starting to face a slowdown as seltzers and cocktails inch in on the alcohol industry.

“It’s hard enough to run a small business when your supply chain is intact,” Bill Butcher, a brew pub operator in Virginia, told the Associated Press. “The unpredictability just injects an element of chaos.”

The craft brewing phenomenon has crested in Texas, with less growth and numerous closures over the past couple of years. Some of that was COVID, some of it is that Gen Z doesn’t drink as much as its elders, some of it was overexposure. But small breweries, which are very neighborhood-based and in my experience are great locations for charity events and fundraisers, are still a big player in the local food and entertainment scene, and we’re better for it. This is another situation where you might think that our state leaders would be unhappy with a federal policy that directly threatened the viability of countless small and medium businesses in Texas. But, well, you know. Worshipping the idol comes first, always.

Posted in Bidness, The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

A win for protecting the right to travel

Good news, but the legal fight is far from over.

The state of Alabama cannot prosecute groups that help people leave the state for an abortion, a federal judge ruled late Monday.

The decision — one of the first to explicitly address abortion-related travel — marks a significant victory for abortion providers and supporters. If the case is appealed, which it almost certainly will be, it will go to the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, half of whose members were appointed by President Donald Trump.

If upheld, Alabama’s policy would have violated the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment and its protection of people’s right to travel, Judge Myron H. Thompson wrote.

The case concerns statements made by Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, who threatened to leverage the state’s criminal conspiracy laws to prosecute people or organizations if they help Alabama residents travel elsewhere for an abortion. Marshall has not filed any lawsuits, but the threat has deterred some reproductive health providers from telling patients about options outside of Alabama, which has a near-total abortion ban in place. It has also stopped abortion funds, nonprofits that help cover the travel and medical costs associated with abortion, from supporting them.

That should change, at least for now, said Meagan Burrows, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented two reproductive health clinics among the plaintiffs in the case.

“The court’s decision today should send a strong message to any and all anti-abortion politicians who are considering similar efforts to muzzle health care providers or penalize those who assist others in crossing state lines to obtain legal abortion: Such attacks on free speech and the fundamental right to travel fly in the face of the Constitution and cannot stand,” Burrows said.

[…]

Still, abortion opponents, troubled by the rise in travel, have sought new ways to deter people from seeking care out of state — generally by targeting the organizations and individuals who support them. So far, these legal efforts have not stopped people from traveling for abortions. In Texas, some counties have passed ordinances that would outlaw using a particular road to transport someone out of state for an abortion, but this kind of ordinance is difficult to enforce and has not directly resulted in any lawsuits.

Some opponents have also attempted to use legal filings as an intimidation tactic, using them to seek information about abortion funds and other individuals who help people travel. Funds have challenged these efforts in court and refused to comply.

The Texas legislature is also debating a bill that would criminalize giving people money they could use to travel out of state for abortions, a provision aimed at abortion funds.

Idaho and Tennessee have passed laws targeting abortion-related travel for minors by threatening prison time for those who help them leave the state if they don’t have a parent’s consent. In December a federal appeals court allowed Idaho’s law to take effect; Tennessee’s has been blocked by a separate judge.

This is one ruling, in a judicial circuit that doesn’t include Texas, but it’s still important. Obviously, there’s a long way to go, and with the Lege considering bills that could greatly widen the scope of abortion prosecutions and enable further attacks on abortion funds and abortion pills, you have to expect a case will eventually come to the Fifth Circuit. For now, it’s good to have the points on the board. Going forward, well, you know. Win more elections and all that. Mother Jones has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of March 31

The Texas Progressive Alliance will be texting this week’s roundup to the Houthi PC Small Group.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on Texas blog roundup for the week of March 31

Measles update: Moving around the state

And we have some new counties to add to the board, too.

The measles outbreak that began in the South Plains region of Texas rose to 422 cases and spread to two new counties on Tuesday, according to health officials.

The update from the Texas Department of State Health Services added 22 infections since the agency’s last update on Friday. The outbreak is mostly spreading in the South Plains region, but some cases have been reported in the Panhandle and northeast Texas.

The latest update also includes the first cases in Erath County, located southwest of Dallas, and Brown County, in west-central Texas.

The outbreak continues to be concentrated in children who have not received the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, or whose vaccination status is unknown. Forty-one people have been hospitalized in Texas and one unvaccinated child has died, the first measles death in the United States since 2015.

Health officials in New Mexico and Oklahoma have said cases in those states are also connected to the Texas outbreak.

New Mexico reported 48 cases on Tuesday, while Oklahoma reported 10. New Mexico has also reported one suspected measles death, an unvaccinated adult who tested positive for the virus after dying.

Health departments in the Houston area have reported a handful of measles cases in recent months, but none have been connected to the outbreak.

Fort Bend County officials confirmed Sunday that a woman tested positive for measles after traveling outside the U.S. The Houston Health Department has reported three measles cases in 2025, all in people who recently returned from international travel.

Texas has reported a total of six measles cases in 2025 that are not associated with the South Plains outbreak. They are not included in the total of 422.

I had been thinking about making a graph of the case numbers, to get a visual clue about the growth rate, but thanks to this Reuters story, now I don’t have to. It may look like a bit of deceleration from this period, but note that there was a similarly modest increase in last Tuesday’s report, and then you saw what happened for Friday. We’re going to need to see several slow periods before we can say that things have leveled out.

ABC13 has a little more on the Fort Bend case. As with the Houston ones, you hope that it doesn’t go beyond that. More worrisome is the cases popping up in Erath and Brown counties. Erath is an exurb of the Metroplex, home of Stephenville. Brown is farther southwest of Erath and not really close to any major metro; it’s closer to Abilene than to Fort Worth. But both are still many miles away from the epicenter in West Texas. How it got from there to those places, that’s the concern.

I didn’t see any news out of Kansas – they may just be reporting once a week, in which case we’ll know more on Friday. Not much else of interest this time so I’ll end here, with the reminder that the unvaccinated population also includes infants who are too young to get the shot and really need herd immunity to be protected, and that Vitamin A may be doing more harm than good, which shouldn’t be that big a surprise given the misinformation climate that has led to it being in the conversation at all. Stay safe out there, y’all. The DMN has more.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Measles update: Moving around the state

I got those “too much overtime cost” blues

More overtime, more problems.

Controller Chris Hollins

The city of Houston is expected to spend twice as much as it budgeted on overtime this year, contributing to next year’s projected $330 million deficit, the city controller’s office said Tuesday.

Overtime costs for Houston police, fire and solid waste departments alone will collectively reach a 10-year high, Deputy City Controller Will Jones told City Council’s budget committee.

The city budgeted $65 million in overtime across all departments this year. The controller’s office now projects the city will spend approximately $137 million on overtime by the end of the fiscal year on June 30.

“There’s nobody that can look at this presentation and not think we better change the way we’re doing things,” said At-Large Councilmember Sallie Alcorn, who chairs the budget committee.

In its report to the council committee, the controller’s office highlighted the police, fire and solid waste departments as the largest contributors to the overtime budget. They regularly have exceeded their overtime budgets for the past decade, and the gaps between budgeted and actual overtime expenses are widening as the departments retain more employees at higher costs, Jones said.

The controller’s overtime projections do not include costs incurred during last year’s derecho and Hurricane Beryl. Those costs will be added if the city is not reimbursed with federal disaster funding, Jones said.

City Council will receive Mayor John Whitmire’s budget proposal for fiscal 2026 in early May, and council members stressed Tuesday they no longer want to allocate millions to overtime pay without addressing why so much is needed.

City departments previously covered part of their overtime costs with money budgeted for jobs that remained unfilled. As the city tries to incentivize the retention of new hires through sign-on bonuses and base-pay increases, the goal is to need less overtime because departments will be adequately staffed, Jones said.

So far, the plan has not had the desired effect.

Among the controller office’s findings:

  • Solid Waste employees who have earned overtime this year have averaged an additional $13,000 in pay. The top 10 overtime earners are expected to see their pay increase 90 percent this year.
  • The top overtime earners at the Houston Police Department are projected to boost their pay by 120 percent through overtime. Those who have earned overtime this year have increased their pay by an average of $8,000.
  • Houston Fire Department employees who have earned overtime have seen their pay increase by an average of $17,000. The top overtime earners are projected to boost their salaries by 230 percent.

As salaries increase, so do hourly overtime rates. Firefighters, for example, received a 10 percent base pay increase this year following approval of a new contract with the firefighters union.

The Houston Police Officers Union currently is in negotiations with the administration over a new contract, which could increase salaries and subsequent overtime costs. Whitmire has said he hopes to make department salaries more competitive with others in the state.

The firefighters put out a sharply worded press release that disputed Controller Hollins’ findings, which neither of the stories that I read noted or quoted from. Make of that what you will. I mean, of course these departments have the highest overtime costs – they’re also by far the biggest part of the overall budget. There are ways to reduce overtime costs, but at least some of them involve either paying for more employees or cutting services. While the costs this year are higher than before, the basic issue that we spend a lot on overtime – and let’s be real, a lot of that has always been with the firefighters, as past reviews have concluded – is one that existed well before this year. It’s still on Mayor Whitmire to address.

Well, and Controller Hollins, too. From the inbox:

To address this, the Controller’s Office will initiate a targeted audit of overtime practices and budget execution within the Solid Waste, Police, and Fire departments. This work is part of the broader FY25 Audit Plan, which was released in early March.

The audit will:

  • Evaluate whether internal controls and payroll procedures ensure the appropriate use and accurate payment of overtime in accordance with City policies
  • Identify the root causes behind escalating overtime and assess how it is managed across departments
  • Deliver practical, actionable recommendations to reduce unnecessary spending while maintaining service quality and compliance

“Transparent, proactive leadership will continue to guide our actions and next steps,” Hollins said. “We flagged this trend only weeks ago, and we’re already taking action. As the City’s financial watchdog, my role requires more than calling out the problem—it’s to help fix it. That means bringing forward practical solutions that protect Houston’s financial future, strengthen services, and preserve access to the resources our communities depend on.”

If there’s one thing we have a lot of right now, it’s audits and efficiency studies. As with the others, I hope this is helpful but I do not expect there to be enough potential savings to offset the need for more revenue. The Chron has more.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Astrodome Conservancy keeps plugging away

I respect the hustle.

Ready and waiting

It’s time to move forward with Vision: Astrodome, the recently unveiled proposal from the Astrodome Conservancy. It activates the power of this historic monument to serve the public, now and long into the future.

Since its opening in 1965, the Astrodome has symbolized Houston’s ingenuity and spirit. As the world’s first multi-purpose indoor stadium, it was a groundbreaking achievement in engineering and design. It hosted legendary moments in sports, and unforgettable performances. Even as thousands of Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo attendees have walked around the building in recent weeks, it sits closed, an underutilized behemoth, its potential in question — a symbol of what was and what could be.

A recent poll by the Houston Business Journal shows that 95% of their readers believe the Astrodome should be reactivated, not demolished. The Astrodome Conservancy’s own community engagement has found a similar level of backing for repurposing the building. There is a clear belief in the value of the Astrodome’s history, its architectural and cultural significance and its potential to contribute to the city’s economic future.

The Astrodome is not a relic; it’s a living part of Houston’s story. The Astrodome Conservancy, in collaboration with Gensler architects, has developed an innovative concept that preserves the Dome’s distinctive features while creating a thriving new hub for commerce and culture. The proposal calls for the creation of a pedestrian boulevard connecting NRG Stadium and NRG Center, cutting through the Dome and transforming its vast interior. The plan would turn the Dome’s arena into a 10,000-seat event space, surrounded by retail shops, restaurants, office space and even a hotel. The vision promotes NRG Park and enhances it as an entertainment destination, addressing the primary tenants needs and enhancing the user experience for all who visit.

The best part? Vision: Astrodome will attract hundreds of millions of private dollars in investment, relieving the burden on Harris County and taxpayers. By tapping into historic tax credits and other non-traditional resources, private investment can fund the redevelopment, making it a sustainable and innovative move for local leadership.

This is the same plan we heard about in November; there’s a separate assessment in progress as well. As I noted, it’s the Texans and the Rodeo that need to be convinced for anything to happen. Now’s as good a time as any to give it a shot.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Astrodome Conservancy keeps plugging away

Recall Houston

Color me skeptical.

Mayor John Whitmire

Recall Houston, a group working to recall Houston Mayor John Whitmire, is gaining steam and reading for a push to get the effort on the ballot in 2025.

The organization has been working for almost a year, but organizers say the timing is now coming together to get the effort off the ground.

Recalling a mayor in Houston requires 25% of the votes in the last general election. For Houston, that’s about 63,000 signatures – all of which must be gathered and submitted within 30 days. That’s more than 2,000 signatures per day- all of whom must be registered voters in the city of Houston.

The group began accepting donations this week to assist with the effort and launched a new website at the beginning of the year.

“Whitmire’s administration is incompetent and dangerous for Houston. Throughout the past year, we’ve seen Whitmire damage our city and risk our future,” the group’s site reads.

A spokesperson for Whitmire told ABC13 that the efforts are not new and that many mayors have faced recall initiatives.

You know I’m not a big fan of Mayor Whitmire. I’ve heard talk from various folks about a recall effort for some time now, so the existence of this campaign, if it is in that stage yet, isn’t a surprise to me. Certainly, some of the items on their webpage resonate with me – I’m extremely unhappy about the large scale undoing of the 2019 Metro NEXT referendum, for one. But let’s review a few facts here.

– 63K signatures is a lot to collect, though it is doable. 63K signatures in a month, and the clock starts as soon as you get the first one, is a massive and expensive effort that would be an underdog under the best of circumstances. Right now, I don’t see any evidence that such an effort is close to being rolled out.

– Part of the reason for that is that there are no names associated with Recall Houston. Look at their About page, which begins with the sentence “Recall for Houston is a group of Houstonians who want to recall Mayor Whitmire.” Glad we cleared that up. Most people would like to know who’s associated with a group before they throw in with it, even if they align with its goals. If you come for the king, you best know that you’ve got a realistic shot at not missing.

– It’s my understanding that the recall process here is not one in which you decide whether or not to oust the Mayor, and then if the answer to that is Yes you run an election to replace him. It’s one in which voters are first asked if they want to oust the Mayor, and then right there on the same ballot, next question, who they’d like to replace him with. In other word, the recall campaign is also the Mayoral campaign for some number of wannabe Mayors, much like the 2003 California gubernatorial recall was also a vote for the next Governor. You may remember what a, um, colorful collection of candidates there were for that. I can only imagine what we’d get in this scenario. Would, say, Chris Hollins throw in his hat? I have my doubts. If there isn’t a serious opponent in this race, one who’d have a decent chance at beating Whitmire in 2027, then what’s the point?

– I may be wrong about that – it’s my understanding from talking with other people who are Also Not Fans of Mayor Whitmire. It seems to me that one of the core missions of a recall effort would be to explain to the voters, who have never experienced such an election at least in the 37 years that I’ve lived in Houston, how this works.

– Anyway, my point is that a serious effort would already have big names and some kind of fundraising structure associated with it. They started accepting donations on March 26. Which, good for them, but there’s a very long way to go from there. I’ll be very interested to see what they show in their July finance report.

– Finally, is there any evidence to suggest that Mayor Whitmire has lost some critical amount of support, enough to perhaps put him in danger of a recall effort? We don’t have that kind of polling operation for Houston, so it’s impossible to say for sure. No doubt, there will be some Whitmire voters from 2023 who don’t like some of the things he has done. Every elected official goes through that. That’s a long step away from “and so let’s fire him and replace him with someone else, TBD who”. Maybe commission a poll, and see what you get.

Anyway, you can follow Recall Houston on BlueSky, whose feed goes back four months, and Twitter, whose feed is much busier and I barely got to the beginning of March before I stopped trying to get to the bottom of it. My best guess from looking at the feeds is that this is coming from the pro-biking, anti-watered-down-Montrose-Blvd-project community. I stand with them on these things, but they largely were anti-Whitmire to begin with, and I don’t know how much that coalition has expanded. This would be one way to find out, if they can get it off the ground. The Chron, which notes a Reddit post by Recall Houston from last June, has more.

UPDATE: From Beth in the comments, there’s this:

If the person sought to be removed shall at said election be recalled, his tenure of office shall terminate upon the determination of the result of the election by the City Council, who shall examine, count and canvass the returns and declare the result as elsewhere provided in this Charter for other elections; and, if an appointed officer, his successor shall at once be appointed by the Mayor and City Council, as provided in this Charter, and if an elective officer, provision shall at once be made for the election of a successor to fill the vacancy, as elsewhere provided for in this Charter and State law.

So it’s oust first, elect successor if needed later. I suppose I prefer that to the alternative, but it would likely mean at least six months with no Mayor. Again, if this were to happen, which at this time I can’t imagine.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Menefee threatens to sue to get CD18 election called

Hope it doesn’t have to come to that, but there’s no reason to trust Greg Abbott.

Christian Menefee

Acting Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee on Monday demanded that Gov. Greg Abbott call a special election to fill the region’s open congressional seat, even going as far as threatening legal action as the governor continues to hold off.

Houston’s 18th Congressional District, which has traditionally been a Democratic stronghold, has been without representation since March 5 after U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner died following health complications.

Menefee was the first to file to replace Turner, doing so just hours after Turner’s west Houston funeral on March 15.

[…]

Abbott’s office on Monday did not respond to questions surrounding the possible litigation, nor did it provide a special election date.

“An announcement on a special election will be made at a later date,” Abbott’s press secretary Andrew Mahaleris wrote in an email.

Well, we know it won’t be in May. My expectation once that deadline passed was that we would have to wait until November, but there’s no reason it couldn’t be earlier. Menefee, who unlike me is an actual lawyer, has presumably read the statute that governs the timing of these special elections more or less as I did, with an eye on the phrase “the election shall be ordered as soon as practicable after the vacancy occurs”. The combination of “shall” and “as soon as practicable” says to me, and I presume to Menefee, who again is an actual lawyer unlike myself, that this means that while Abbott has some discretion – no specific deadline to call it, yadda yadda yadda – he can’t not call it, and he can’t wait forever to call it.

What “practicable” means in the real world is something that the courts would decide, if and when Menefee and likely a couple of CD18 voters as co-plaintiffs sue to force the matter. I have no idea how that may go because we’ve never really faced this before – these elections have been delayed sometimes – the HD143 election in 2005 is the most prominent example in my mind – but having to wait nearly eight months until November is unprecedented as far as I know. Who knows what logical knots will get tied as the state tries to defend that, if it comes to it.

The simple solution is to call the election sooner than that. We had the chance to do that in May, but here we are. Given the deadline situation, if Menefee is to make good on his threat, he’ll be suing in the next couple of weeks. Stay tuned. This Landing story from Friday is about the state of CD18 and the possible long wait to resolve it, so not about this new development but worth your time anyway.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Menefee threatens to sue to get CD18 election called

Why are we now tearing up bike lanes?

This is bullshit.

Without prior announcement, the city of Houston has begun removing the dedicated bike lane on a key street, raising concerns among residents about transparency and the city’s commitment to pedestrian and cycling infrastructure.

The potential loss of the Austin Street bike lane in Midtown first came to light through a Texas Public Information Act request by a community activist. The request revealed emails between city engineers discussing plans to replace the dedicated bike lane between Holman and Pierce streets with sharrows — shared lane markings that indicate cyclists and motorists must share the road.

The emails were shared publicly last Thursday. The Houston Chronicle contacted Houston Public Works on Friday to confirm whether the city was proceeding with the removal, but the department did not provide an answer.

By Monday, BikeHouston Executive Director Joe Cutrufo received a call informing him that crews were actively dismantling the bike lane. He rode down Austin Street to confirm it himself.

“It’s one thing if you’re going to redesign a street,” Cutrufo said. “It’s entirely another to do it first thing on a Monday morning without any announcement whatsoever.”

As of Monday morning, Houston Public Works still hadn’t responded to questions about the project.

Cutrufo called the bike lane the backbone of Houston’s cycling network between Hermann Park and Buffalo Bayou.

“This bikeway is widely used by commuters who rely on it to safely get to and from work every day,” he said. “And it’s not just cyclists — running clubs and individual runners use Austin Street to create longer routes connecting Rice University, Hermann Park, and Buffalo Bayou. This is a critical piece of the city’s active transportation network.”

The emails obtained via the Public Information Act request date back to June 10 and 11, 2024. A city engineer wrote to a senior project manager at KCI Technologies:

“Please prepare a proposal for Work Order #7 on the N-321040-0087-3 contract. The project is a rehab (mill & overlay) of Austin St., from Holman to Pierce. Additionally, it will require some design work on the lane configuration. We would like to take out the dedicated bike lane and use sharrows instead.”

The Houston Chronicle asked Houston Public Works to confirm whether the city planned to remove the bike lane, what the timeline for the work was, and whether there was any justification for the decision. A department spokesperson acknowledged receiving the questions but never provided a response.

Crews began dismantling the bike lane’s protective barriers Monday morning.

The removal of Austin Street’s dedicated bike lane is the latest city action raising alarm among transportation advocates, who blame Mayor John Whitmire’s administration for a broader push away from pedestrian and cyclist friendly infrastructure.

“It’s bad enough that there was no notice, but it’s even worse that it’s happening at all,” said transportation advocate Michael Moritz. “It’s bewildering that the mayor would not only remove popular protected bike infrastructure, but also promote street projects that widen car lanes in urban areas, reducing safety for all users.”

Add in the removal of barriers from the Heights Blvd lanes last week and you begin to see this as a planned attack. I’m a lot more worried about West 11th Street now than I was before. The fact that it happened without notice and without the Public Works Department bothering to respond to questions about it makes it even more infuriating.

And for all of the yammering on about efficiency and cutting waste and so on, how is it fiscally responsible to tear out intact functional infrastructure that’s not even five years old? Even if the cost of doing so is relatively small, why was this a priority over all of the other things Public Works does? Were there no potholes to fill? No long-requested speed bumps to install? What are we doing here?

I’ll leave you with this:

I hope a lot of people show up at the next Council meeting to yell at the Mayor about this. I know I’ve just been critical of the Recall Houston effort as it now stands, but nothing will make me root harder for them than crap like this. Houston Public Media has more.

UPDATE: You have got to be kidding me:

So the city went in and destroyed a bike lane that they didn’t build? Honestly, I hope Harris County sues to recover the initial cost and the cost of rebuilding. Total amateur hour over there.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Allred considering 2026 Senate run

Fine by me.

Colin Allred

On a night when he urged a group of erstwhile Republicans to stay in the fight, former U.S. Rep. Colin Allred said he’s “seriously considering” a 2026 Senate campaign against incumbent John Cornyn, or the winner of what’s expected to be a bruising GOP primary.

Allred appeared at an event sponsored by Principles First, a group of conservatives opposed to President Donald Trump. It was his first public appearance since his loss to Republican Ted Cruz.

In an interview with The Dallas Morning News before the event, Allred lamented his loss to Cruz, briefly discussed his political future and delighted in the time he’s spending with his young family. It was his first public interview since his Senate defeat.

The Dallas Democrat said he would make a decision on another Senate run this summer.

“I’m looking at it and seriously considering it,” Allred said. “This is a time for everybody to realize just what’s at stake and how important it is that we all stay involved.”

Cornyn released a video Wednesday launching his Senate campaign in what’s expected to be an explosive Republican primary. Texas Attorney General
Ken Paxton is in the exploratory stage of a potential Senate campaign against Cornyn. Other Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Beth Van Duyne of Irving and Wesley Hunt of Houston, have been mentioned as potential GOP Senate candidates.

[…]

Throughout the hour-long conversation, Allred criticized Trump administration policies.

“Folks elected Donald Trump so they could buy groceries, not Greenland,” Allred said.

Allred also criticized some of Trump’s cabinet picks, saying Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth “couldn’t manage a hot dog stand” and that there were concerns that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was a “Russian plant.”

The Republican-controlled Senate should have blocked many of Trump’s appointments, Allred said. And he predicted more controversies akin to the security breach in which top Trump officials inadvertently included a journalist in a group chat about the administration’s plans to bomb Houthi targets in Yemen.

“This is the first example of what will likely be many that we will see in which some kind of nonsense happens because we have people in place who are unqualified and shouldn’t be on the job in the first place.”

Allred also questioned Trump’s use of tariffs, saying Texas lawmakers should be against them. Earlier this month Trump postponed 25% tariffs on many imports from Canada and Mexico as fears of a trade war persisted among some economic experts. The White House says its tariff policy involves stopping the smuggling of fentanyl across the nation’s borders.

“If you’re an elected official in Texas, you better be against tariffs,” Allred said. “We’re the No. 1 trade state in the country … that’s what we do. That’s our economy.”

The case for an Allred rerun is simple: He’s now actually run a statewide campaign, he raised plenty of money for it, he was easily the top-performing Democrat on the 2024 ticket, and there’s no one else remotely ready who has expressed any interest. I love Reps. Jasmine Crockett and Greg Casar too, but maybe let them finish their second term in office before promoting them to a statewide run. If either of them wants to take on Ted Cruz in 2030, I’ll be all over that.

My advice to Allred for now is to keep talking like this. Attack Trump and his army of morons and miscreants at every step. (Work some more Elon into it, too.) Make it clear that you will act as a member of the opposition party. The bet is simply that Trump et al will continue to make things worse, and at some point enough people – which, let’s be clear, is going to need to include a non-trivial number of people who have voted for Trump and Cornyn in the past – will be receptive to that. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t – maybe things don’t get quite bad enough, maybe there just aren’t enough people willing to try something else – but it’s a clear path. We’ll see what he decides to do. Reform Austin has more.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

More efficiency studying

Sure, why not.

Mayor John Whitmire

Houston Public Works and the city controller’s office will receive deeper analyses of their operations and finances after the city council on Wednesday voted to expand the purview of Mayor John Whitmire’s efficiency study.

The study, completed by Houston-based accounting firm Ernst & Young, aims to rid the city of any potential wasteful spending and processes that are hindering providing city services.

Results of a sweep across the city’s 22 departments found potential misuse of city credit cards, as well as extensive problems with the process the city uses to secure goods and services.

The council’s vote on Wednesday allocated $388,000 more toward the study, bringing the city’s  investment in streamlining operations from $965,000 to more than $1.35 million, according to council agenda documents.

City leaders in September also voted to expand the study to take a deeper look into Houston’s 28 tax districts following a scandal with the city’s Midtown Redevelopment Authority where an official misspent $8.5 million that was supposed to go toward affordable housing.

Council on Wednesday also voted to approve a nearly $4 million for support services through Ernst & Young to monitor and help implement the recommendations laid out in the study over the next 18 months.

See here for the background. As I’ve said before, I’m fine with doing this – if one must make cuts, it’s far better to be pragmatic and calibrated about it, unlike the approach that the DOGEbags are taking – and it doesn’t take much to cover the cost of doing the studies. I am curious whether Controller Chris Hollins was involved in this part of it, since it’s his office that will be under the microscope, but there’s nothing in the story and I didn’t see anything on his Twitter feed. I remain unconvinced that all this will find more than modest savings, but as with many other things I’m happy to be proven wrong.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Kendall Scudder elected TDP Chair

Congratulations and good luck.

Kendall Scudder

The Texas Democratic Party’s governing board on Saturday elected Kendall Scudder to lead the party forward as its new chair after a devastating performance in November and years of electoral defeats.

“The challenge that we’re facing right now is terrifying for this country and for this state, and a lot of people are counting on us to come together and do the right thing and make sure that we are building a Texas Democratic Party that is worthy of the grassroots in this state,” Scudder said upon taking the gavel. “Let’s build a party that the working men and women of this state can be proud of.”

Scudder took 65 out of 121 votes, an outright majority in the seven-way race.

Scudder will take over as chair of the state party at a moment when Democrats are grasping for a way forward after blowout losses up and down the ballot last year, including President Donald Trump’s victory and a surge to the right by traditionally Democratic groups, such as Hispanic voters in South Texas.

After proclaiming Texas a competitive state where Democratic candidates had a fighting chance of winning statewide for the first time in three decades, party leaders instead watched as Trump and U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz trounced their Democratic challengers by roughly 14 and 9 percentage points, respectively. Democrats also ceded ground in the state Legislature and lost nearly every contested state appellate court race, in addition to 10 judicial races in Harris County — eating away at years of Democratic dominance in Texas’ largest county.

That left many Democrats concerned that, after appearing to come within striking distance of winning statewide in 2018, the party was back at a sobering low.

Longtime Texas Democratic Party Chair Gilberto Hinojosa announced his resignation shortly after the election, acknowledging the party’s poor performance and a need for a new direction.

That push for a fresh vision defined the race for party chair. Scudder will be the incumbent come 2026, when a broader group of delegates will elect the next full-term chair at the party convention in Corpus Christi. The 121-member State Democratic Executive Committee chose Hinojosa’s successor at the Saturday meeting, its first quarterly meeting of the year, because he resigned in the middle of his four-year term.

During his campaign, Scudder, an East Texas native, emphasized the importance of listening to the “grassroots.” Even before he launched his candidacy, he had accused party leadership under Hinojosa of ignoring those voters and activists. He wants to “recalibrate” the party toward a focus on working people.

“The reality is simply that Democrats on the ground don’t have a lot of confidence in party leadership anymore,” Scudder told The Texas Tribune in an interview on Thursday.

He wants the party to pay attention to areas he says it has previously written off, like rural communities, and put a priority on Spanish-language communications.

Scudder has worked in affordable housing and real estate. He came onto the state party stage through the SDEC, although he began his political activism with the Texas Young Democrats and the Texas College Democrats.

Scudder’s leading opponents, former Harris County Democratic Party Chair Lillie Schechter and former Annie’s List Executive Director Patsy Woods Martin, had offered similar but competing visions to re-establish Democratic credibility on kitchen table issues and reconnect with voters in their communities. During the campaign, Schechter and Woods Martin emphasized their experience getting Democratic candidates elected.

With no disrespect intended, I would have voted for Lillie Schechter if I’d had a vote, because of her experience as HCDP Chair. I thought she did an excellent job during her tenure. I’m fine with Scudder’s election, I have met and spoken with him and was impressed by what he had to say, and we could certainly do with some youth and new energy. I don’t have any advice to offer, mostly because I don’t know that I have any worthy insights after what happened last year. This is a tough job, we have a lot of ground to make up and a lot working against us, and the Republican Party is completely unhinged. I wish Kendall Scudder all the best.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Weekend link dump for March 30

“J.D. Vance Is the Most Disliked New Vice President in History”.

“The leading Chinese electric carmaker BYD has soared in value after it said its latest batteries charge fast enough to add 400km (249 miles) of range in only five minutes.”

“Why don’t we remember being a baby? New study provides clues”.

“Motorists have traded in a record number of Tesla electric vehicles this month, Edmunds data showed, amid a wave of protests against CEO Elon Musk’s work as an adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump.”

“The White House is offering a new corporate sponsorship opportunity-slash-potential-ethics-catastrophe: The annual Easter Egg Roll.”

“The real division now among Democrats is not principally ideological, it’s fight vs risk aversion and the old proceduralism. They think the left/center and fight/no fight spectra overlap more or less perfectly. They’re wrong.”

RIP, Bill Mercer, longtime Dallas journalist and sportscaster who was the voice of World Class Championship Wrestling from 1982 to 1987, called the 1967 “Ice Bowl”, and was the first person to inform Lee Harvey Oswald he had been charged with murdering President Kennedy.

RIP, Max Frankel, former executive editor of the New York Times who was with that paper for nearly 50 years.

“I’m 66 years old and I have never seen the Danes so upset before.”

“Long Before The White Lotus, Mike White and I Made a Really Good Show You’ll Never See”.

RIP, Mia Love, first Black Republican woman to serve in Congress.

We call upon all branches of government to support the rule of law and the essential role of lawyers in our democracy, and to reject any efforts to use the tremendous power of the government against members of the legal profession for performing their duty. We further call upon our fellow members of the legal profession as well as members of the public at large to reject any attempt to harass or intimidate our country’s lawyers and judges for simply doing their jobs.”

“The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans”.

“If it was anyone other than Hillary Clinton, they would be in jail right now. If you are using unclassified means, there is the potential for and likelihood that foreign governments are targeting those accounts.”

“But this is what happens when you hire for incompetence.”

“The National Security Agency sent out an operational security special bulletin to its employees in February 2025 warning them of vulnerabilities in using the encrypted messaging application Signal”.

DNA of 15 Million People for Sale in 23andMe Bankruptcy”.

“The court martial ultimately prevented Robinson from deploying with his original unit to Europe. While he was eventually acquitted, that little-known court martial represents one of the great Sliding Doors moments in 20th-century American history. A guilty verdict could very well have stopped his MLB career well before it started. A less-insanely-racist bus driver may have meant Lt. Robinson was deployed to Europe, and who knows what happens from there. That the whole affair began because whiteness is a concept we create, define, and uphold, and a given woman was seen to be just white enough to be “threatened,” is one of history’s dark jokes.”

“On average, streaming video subscribers in the U.S. pay for four services totaling $69 per month, a 13% year-over-year increase”.

“Florida’s attorney general has opened a criminal investigation into Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan, who traveled to the U.S. last week.”

RIP, Carole Keeton Strayhorn, former Austin mayor, Railroad Commissioner, and Comptroller.

“The best-known member of Elon Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service team of technologists once provided support to a cybercrime gang that bragged about trafficking in stolen data and cyberstalking an FBI agent, according to digital records reviewed by Reuters.”

“Smarter people than I have analyzed the legal and political fallout from the scandal. I was attracted to something far dumber. Reading through the full transcript released Wednesday, it became clear to me that beyond a secretive attack-planning committee, the dynamics of the discussion reminded me of the typical boys group chat. All of the archetypes and characters I’m familiar with in my own life were there. So I took it upon myself to annotate the thread like the frat house that has become our executive branch. You can trust me on this. I went to the University of Texas.”

“Universities and churches are struggling to respond as students, professors, neighbors, and other members of their communities are being detained and disappeared without any legal defense. So I think it is good and instructive and edifying to remember that this has happened before and to review how one community responded to exactly this same quasi-legal authoritarian threat from quasi-government officials and why their children to all generations honor them for doing it, and every good and honest person says they had done right.”

RIP, LJ Smith, author of The Vampire Diaries novels.

“Yolanda Saldivar was denied parole by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles on Thursday.”

“The truth is, Hayao Miyazaki would hate you fucking losers. Every last one of you using this abomination of technology, whether just for a lark or because you actually hold an ideological commitment to killing artistry, jobs, and the Earth in favor of enriching the most craven, grasping, ruinous people alive.”

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 1 Comment

Of course the Justice Department dropped the GLO screw job complaint

What did you expect? Or for that matter, what did I expect?

The findings were stark. In one investigation, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development concluded that a Texas state agency had steered $1 billion in disaster mitigation money away from Houston and nearby communities of color after Hurricane Harvey inundated the region in 2017. In another investigation, HUD found that a homeowners association outside of Dallas had created rules to kick poor Black people out of their neighborhood.

The episodes amounted to egregious violations of civil rights laws, officials at the housing agency believed — enough to warrant litigation against the alleged culprits. That, at least, was the view during the presidency of Joe Biden. After the Trump administration took over, HUD quietly took steps that will likely kill both cases, according to three officials familiar with the matter.

Those steps were extremely unusual. Current and former HUD officials said they could not recall the housing agency ever pulling back cases of this magnitude in which the agency had found evidence of discrimination. That leaves the yearslong, high-profile investigations in a state of limbo, with no likely path for the government to advance them, current and former officials said. As a result, the alleged perpetrators of the discrimination could face no government penalties, and the alleged victims could receive no compensation.

“I just think that’s a doggone shame,” said Doris Brown, a Houston resident and a co-founder of a community group that, together with a housing nonprofit, filed the Harvey complaint. Brown saw 3 feet of water flood her home in a predominantly Black neighborhood that still shows damage from the storm. “We might’ve been able to get some more money to help the people that are still suffering,” she said.

On Jan. 15, HUD referred the Houston case to the Department of Justice, a necessary step to a federal lawsuit after the housing agency finds evidence of discrimination. Less than a month later, on Feb. 13, the agency rescinded its referral without public explanation. HUD did the same with the Dallas case not long after.

The development has alarmed some about a rollback of civil rights enforcement at the agency under President Donald Trump and HUD Secretary Scott Turner, who is from Texas. “The new administration is systematically dismantling the fair housing enforcement and education system,” said Sara Pratt, a former HUD official and an attorney for complainants in both Texas cases. “The message is: The federal government no longer takes housing discrimination seriously.”

I hate to say it, but I saw this coming. Not that it took genius-level insight or anything. As some of the people who are on the business end of this said to the Chron, a bit part of the problem here is that it took so damn long for HUD to make the discrimination finding and then refer it to the DOJ. With a different President, that would be annoying but not fatal. Not so much now. I don’t have a good answer for this – maybe it can be picked up again under a different President, assuming there aren’t any statutes of limitations and that there’s still some semblance of a federal government to pick it up. Beyond that, I got nothing. This well and truly sucks.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Of course the Justice Department dropped the GLO screw job complaint

Some plaintiffs drop out of redistricting litigation

Unfortunate but not unexpected.

Two months before a scheduled trial, a coalition of voting rights groups is withdrawing from a long-running challenge to the political maps Texas drew after the 2020 U.S. census, which the groups said diluted the voting power of Black, Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander Texans.

The outcome of the case, which has been making its way through the courts for nearly four years, will have implications for how much power Texans will have to decide who represents them in the state Legislature and U.S. Congress.

The voting-rights coalition said it decided against continuing the litigation after its claims were dismissed by a trial-court panel of federal judges in February, following a ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that experts said upended longstanding precedents.

The withdrawal is the latest tangible effect of recent court rulings that experts say make it difficult for coalitions to bring claims on behalf of groups of historically marginalized voters.

The coalition that withdrew included Fair Maps Texas Action Committee, OCA-Greater Houston, the North Texas chapter of the Asian Pacific Islander Americans Public Affairs Association, Emgage Texas, and 13 individual voters. They are represented by the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, the ACLU of Texas, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and the Brennan Center for Justice.

Their case had been consolidated with that of other plaintiffs who were also challenging the maps. The remaining claims are still set to go to trial beginning May 21.

The remaining plaintiffs in the case are organizations representing Latino and Black Texans, such as the League of United Latin American Citizens, the Texas NAACP, and the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, as well as individual Texans.

The 5th Circuit had decided long ago that different groups of minority voters could be combined to support a claim in such a redistricting case, as long as they were groups that tended to vote the same way. Essentially, if there aren’t enough Black voters or Latino voters, or voters of another protected class, to make up a majority of the district by themselves, they can join forces as plaintiffs if they can show that their political interests align. That’s how the coalition of groups came together to challenge the Texas voting maps.

But in 2024, the same court overturned that precedent, prompting the trial court judges to dismiss the coalition’s claims. As a result, “It’ll be much harder for plaintiffs to bring those claims in the Fifth Circuit in Texas and in Mississippi and Louisiana, than it is elsewhere in the country,” said Justin Levitt, an election law professor at Loyola Marymount University and a former deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s civil rights division.

These lawsuits were filed in 2021. There were some state cases as well as federal, and I think some may have been moved to federal court while at least one was dropped, and I have no idea about the rest. The Justice Department filed their own lawsuit a couple of weeks later, but it was dropped by the Trumpists in March. Those lawsuits were broader and about multiple districts, but there were other, narrower actions as well. As was the case with the challenges to the omnibus voter suppression law, the hearings were delayed until after the 2022 election; it’s obviously taken much longer than that. SCOTUS has weighed in on racial gerrymandering, and other federal courts have raised the stakes, and all of that may be out of date by now.

Basically, I have no idea what to expect from the May 21 hearing. The script in the recent past has been a win at the district court level for the plaintiffs, and then the Fifth Circuit and SCOTUS get involved, with predictably awful results. It would not surprise me if we follow that basic path, with SCOTUS being given another chance to do violence to the Voting Rights Act in a couple of years. Buckle up.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Some plaintiffs drop out of redistricting litigation

Buc-ee’s versus Barc-ee’s

Oh, come on now.

First was Choke CanyonThen came Duckees. One month later, Super Fuels went under the microscope. This week, a canine-focused Missouri business became the latest target of legal action from a popular Texas-based super rest stop. Ladies and gentlemen: It’s Buc-ee’s vs. Barc-ee’s.

Buc-ee’s filed a lawsuit Wednesday in U.S. Western District Court of Missouri against EJL Acquisitions and Home Away From Home Dog Training, alleging their indoor-outdoor-dog-and-game-yard-cum-coffee-shop Barc-ee’s is infringing on its trademark since it’s a business offering similar services and products with a “confusingly similar” name and logo.

“Defendants’ unauthorized use of the Barc-ee’s Mark and the Barc-ee’s Logo, which are confusingly similar to the Buc-ee’s Trademarks, will allow Defendants to receive the benefit of the goodwill built up at the great labor and expense by Buc-ee’s in the Buc-ee’s Trademarks, and further will allow Defendants to gain acceptance for their services and products based on their own merits, but on an association with the reputation and goodwill of Buc-ee’s,” read a complaint submitted Wednesday in court.

In June 2024, Barc-ee’s announced its impending arrival in Marshfield, Missouri. According to a story then by the Springfield News-Leader in Springfield, Missouri, Barc-ee’s owner John Lopez hoped his business would be a popular stop in the Ozarks for dog owners.

“Most of the time when you’re traveling with your dog, you’re kind of just holding the leash while you’re pumping gas,” Lopez told the News-Leader.

Per the News-Leader’s 2024 article, the 7,500-square-foot Barc-ee’s would include a dog park, have food and coffee, sell antiques and Amish pies, have a Tesla charging station and “a Western-themed miniature city for kids.” Plus, Barc-ee’s hoped to advertise its business “up to 600 miles” away from its location via billboards along Interstate 44, a tactic employed by Buc-ee’s.

Citing Buc-ee’s, Lopez told the News-Leader in 2024 that his legal team “confirmed there are no issues with the similar names.”

Meanwhile, Barc-ee’s logo is of a smiling, hat-wearing dog driving a pink convertible while clutching a coffee cup. Buc-ee’s alleges in the complaint that the Barc-ee’s logo “copies and/or mimics important aspects” of Buc-ee’s well-known cartoon beaver logo.

Barc-ee’s soft-opened in October 2024 and celebrated a grand opening in January. According to the complaint filed Wednesday, Buc-ee’s claims Barc-ee’s had full knowledge of Buc-ee’s and its trademarks, using the quotes in the News-Leader report as evidence.

Choke Canyon was almost a decade ago, but it actually wasn’t the first logo lawsuit filed by Buc-ee’s. Duck-ee’s and Super Fuels are more recent, and there was a lawsuit against a “Buky’s” gas station/convenience store in between. The two most recent lawsuits were filed after Barc-ee’s soft opening, so perhaps their legal beagles could be forgiven for not knowing about them, but come on. You cannot be serious with this claim that there would be no legal issues with that name, given the history and Buc-ee’s willingness to sue anything that moves.

Barc-ee’s has temporarily closed to deal with some electrical issues, while acknowledging the lawsuit against them. My advice to them would be to come up with a new name when they reopen. I’ll charge you half of what your existing lawyers charged you for their advice, Barc-ee’s.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments